News Release
Public Court Documents
December 19, 1990

4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. News Release, 1990. 52e92089-5d40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/00a26729-c09c-4867-8f40-b7dbb7978d5a/news-release. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
213-629-5329 PE EA NEDC—Los Brgeles TEL. 2 a Lm pe ; a Neos Release 1) Cc Natural Resources Defense Council FROM: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Joel Reynolds (213) 892-1500 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATTONAIL FUND Dan Fleshler (212) 219-1900 ADVISORY A LAWSUIT CHARGING THAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS IGNORING A SERIOUS HEALTH HAZARD TO TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN BY FAILING TO IMPLEMENT A FEDERALLY REQUIRED LEAD POISONING TESTING AND TREATMENT PROGRAM, WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF A NEWS CONFERENCE ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 10:00 A.M., AT THE OFFICES OF THE NAACP LEGAL, DEFENSE FUND, 315 WEST 9TH STREET, SUITE 208, LOS ANGELES. A COALITION OF HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAI, AND CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS BRINGING THE LAWSUIT WILL CITE THE STATE'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH FEDERAL LAW --~ THUS SENTENCING THOUSANDS OF POOR AND MINORITY CALIFORNIA CHILDREN TO SLOW, SILENT CONTAMINATION. A DATE: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1890 TIVE: . 10:00 A.YM, PLACE: NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND 31% WEST 9TH STREET, SUITE 208 LOS ANGELES BAA MEDC-Los Angeles 16. 213-639-5307 NRK. News Release 1- Natural Resources Defense Council EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL Thursday, December 20, 1990, 9:00 a.m. PST FROM: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL Joel Reynolds (213) 892-1500 NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM Jane Perkins (213) 204-6010 NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND Connie Rice (213) 624-2405 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Mark Rosenbaum (213) 487-1720 LEGAL AID SQCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY Susan Spelletich (415) 451-9261 LANDMARK LAWSUIT CHARGES CALIFORNIA LACKS REQUIRED PROGRAM TO SCREEN AND TREAT THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN AFFLICTED WITH LEAD POISONING Los Angeles, Thursday, December 20 -- A landmark lawsuit filed in federal court today charges that the State of California is violating federal law by failing to implement a program to screen and treat thousands of poor children who may be victims of lead poisoning. This lawsuit marks the first time that a state has been sued to compel it to comply with 1989 amendments to the federal Medicaid Act, which require states to provide lead blood screening as part of early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment for eligible children. This class action lawsuit against Dr. Kenneth Kizer, Director of the California Department of Health Services, was brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council {(HRDCY, the National Health law Program (NHeLP), the NAACP Legal Defense and ‘o@ 12:48 PARE MRDC—Loz Angeles TEL 213-629-5359 F. Educational Fund (LDF), the Legal Aid Soclety of Alameda County and the ACLU Foundations of Southern and Northern California, on behalf of People United for a Better Oakland, Erika and Jalisa Mathews and all others similarly situated. Joel R. Reynolds, Senior Attorney for the NRDC, said: "This is a case in which environmental, poverty, and civil rights interests lead inescapably to one conclusion: The State Department of Health Services cannot continue to ignore the slow poisoning of our children by lead contamination. Congress has clearly given states the duty to test and treat the thousands of children who may be victims of lead poisoning. That duty must now be enforced by the courts." In 1989, over 570,000 California children age five and under were eligible for mandatory lead screening. There is a total of more than a million eligible California youth under age 21. The California Department of Health Services itself has estimated that 50,000 children annually could be found to have toxic blood levels if all children at risk in California were tested. Jane Perkins, an attorney for NHelLP, said: "By failing to implement the mandatory federal lead testing program, the Department 1s ignoring a ticking time bomb. In most parts of California, lead testing is not only haphazard, it is non- existent. As a result, only a tiny fraction of the thousands of cases predicted by the State are ever detected. This is particularly tragic since, once detected, lead poiscning and reiated health defects can be treated and, in many cases, measures can be undertaken to detect and eliminate the source of exposure.” Nn aE 12:49 PEGE MRDC-Los Angeles TEL 213-625-5353 Pp, Experts estimate that over three million children nationwide -- approximately one in six -- suffer from lead poisoning and that more than two~thirds of black inner city children are affected. Connie Rice of the NAACP legal Defense Fund, said: "Minorities and the poor bear the brunt of this problem and they're being needlessly contaminated while the State twiddles its thumbs, This problem is not just limited to California, and we hope this suit will be a national model for others who seek to compel states to meet the desperate health care needs of their inner city children." The lawsuit charges that while the Medi-Cal program does provide early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment (EPSDT) through the Child Health and Disability Prevention Program, lead blood assessments are not a mandatory part of the screening provided. This is a clear violation of the Department's statutory mandate, and the plaintiffs are asking the court to require the State to provide such screening and treatment. Lead is contained in many commonly used products, such as paint, gasoline, water pipes, inks and pigments used in toys, fertilizers and some food cans. ILead's short and long-term effects may include decreased intelligence, loss of short-term memory, underachievement in reading and spelling, impairment of visual-motor functioning, impotence, sterility, spontaneous abortion, anemia, convulsions, hypertension, kidney disease and cancer. Children and fetuses are especially vulnerable to these effects because their neurologic systems are developing. IN