News Release
Public Court Documents
December 19, 1990
4 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Matthews v. Kizer Hardbacks. News Release, 1990. 52e92089-5d40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/00a26729-c09c-4867-8f40-b7dbb7978d5a/news-release. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
213-629-5329 PE EA NEDC—Los Brgeles TEL. 2 a Lm pe ; a
Neos Release
1) Cc Natural Resources
Defense Council
FROM: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Joel Reynolds (213) 892-1500
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATTONAIL FUND Dan Fleshler (212) 219-1900
ADVISORY
A LAWSUIT CHARGING THAT THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IS IGNORING
A SERIOUS HEALTH HAZARD TO TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN BY
FAILING TO IMPLEMENT A FEDERALLY REQUIRED LEAD POISONING TESTING
AND TREATMENT PROGRAM, WILL BE THE SUBJECT OF A NEWS CONFERENCE
ON THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 10:00 A.M., AT THE OFFICES OF THE NAACP
LEGAL, DEFENSE FUND, 315 WEST 9TH STREET, SUITE 208, LOS ANGELES.
A COALITION OF HEALTH, ENVIRONMENTAI, AND CIVIL RIGHTS GROUPS
BRINGING THE LAWSUIT WILL CITE THE STATE'S FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
FEDERAL LAW --~ THUS SENTENCING THOUSANDS OF POOR AND MINORITY
CALIFORNIA CHILDREN TO SLOW, SILENT CONTAMINATION.
A
DATE: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 20, 1890
TIVE: . 10:00 A.YM,
PLACE: NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
31% WEST 9TH STREET, SUITE 208
LOS ANGELES
BAA MEDC-Los Angeles 16. 213-639-5307
NRK. News Release
1- Natural Resources
Defense Council
EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE UNTIL
Thursday, December 20, 1990, 9:00 a.m. PST
FROM: NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Joel Reynolds (213) 892-1500
NATIONAL HEALTH LAW PROGRAM
Jane Perkins (213) 204-6010
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
Connie Rice (213) 624-2405
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION
Mark Rosenbaum (213) 487-1720
LEGAL AID SQCIETY OF ALAMEDA COUNTY
Susan Spelletich (415) 451-9261
LANDMARK LAWSUIT CHARGES CALIFORNIA LACKS REQUIRED PROGRAM
TO SCREEN AND TREAT THOUSANDS OF CHILDREN AFFLICTED
WITH LEAD POISONING
Los Angeles, Thursday, December 20 -- A landmark lawsuit
filed in federal court today charges that the State of California
is violating federal law by failing to implement a program to
screen and treat thousands of poor children who may be victims of
lead poisoning.
This lawsuit marks the first time that a state has been sued
to compel it to comply with 1989 amendments to the federal
Medicaid Act, which require states to provide lead blood
screening as part of early and periodic screening, diagnosis and
treatment for eligible children.
This class action lawsuit against Dr. Kenneth Kizer,
Director of the California Department of Health Services, was
brought by the Natural Resources Defense Council {(HRDCY, the
National Health law Program (NHeLP), the NAACP Legal Defense and
‘o@ 12:48 PARE MRDC—Loz Angeles TEL 213-629-5359 F.
Educational Fund (LDF), the Legal Aid Soclety of Alameda County
and the ACLU Foundations of Southern and Northern California, on
behalf of People United for a Better Oakland, Erika and Jalisa
Mathews and all others similarly situated.
Joel R. Reynolds, Senior Attorney for the NRDC, said: "This
is a case in which environmental, poverty, and civil rights
interests lead inescapably to one conclusion: The State
Department of Health Services cannot continue to ignore the slow
poisoning of our children by lead contamination. Congress has
clearly given states the duty to test and treat the thousands of
children who may be victims of lead poisoning. That duty must
now be enforced by the courts."
In 1989, over 570,000 California children age five and under
were eligible for mandatory lead screening. There is a total of
more than a million eligible California youth under age 21. The
California Department of Health Services itself has estimated
that 50,000 children annually could be found to have toxic blood
levels if all children at risk in California were tested.
Jane Perkins, an attorney for NHelLP, said: "By failing to
implement the mandatory federal lead testing program, the
Department 1s ignoring a ticking time bomb. In most parts of
California, lead testing is not only haphazard, it is non-
existent. As a result, only a tiny fraction of the thousands of
cases predicted by the State are ever detected. This is
particularly tragic since, once detected, lead poiscning and
reiated health defects can be treated and, in many cases,
measures can be undertaken to detect and eliminate the source of
exposure.”
Nn
aE 12:49 PEGE MRDC-Los Angeles TEL 213-625-5353 Pp,
Experts estimate that over three million children nationwide
-- approximately one in six -- suffer from lead poisoning and
that more than two~thirds of black inner city children are
affected.
Connie Rice of the NAACP legal Defense Fund, said:
"Minorities and the poor bear the brunt of this problem and
they're being needlessly contaminated while the State twiddles
its thumbs, This problem is not just limited to California, and
we hope this suit will be a national model for others who seek to
compel states to meet the desperate health care needs of their
inner city children."
The lawsuit charges that while the Medi-Cal program does
provide early and periodic screening, diagnosis and treatment
(EPSDT) through the Child Health and Disability Prevention
Program, lead blood assessments are not a mandatory part of the
screening provided. This is a clear violation of the Department's
statutory mandate, and the plaintiffs are asking the court to
require the State to provide such screening and treatment.
Lead is contained in many commonly used products, such as
paint, gasoline, water pipes, inks and pigments used in toys,
fertilizers and some food cans. ILead's short and long-term
effects may include decreased intelligence, loss of short-term
memory, underachievement in reading and spelling, impairment of
visual-motor functioning, impotence, sterility, spontaneous
abortion, anemia, convulsions, hypertension, kidney disease and
cancer. Children and fetuses are especially vulnerable to these
effects because their neurologic systems are developing.
IN