Dallas, Texas. -- The U.S. Court of Appeals

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 8a193257-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Dallas, Texas. -- The U.S. Court of Appeals, 1957. 8a193257-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/02ab34e3-99d5-42ef-a4ff-4a645f6f948e/dallas-texas-the-us-court-of-appeals. Accessed October 09, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE ® * 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
107 WEST 43 STREET © NEW YORK 36, N. Y. © JUdson 6-8397 

ARTHUR B. SPINGARN oa THURGOOD MARSHALL 
President Director and Counsel 

ROY WILKINS ROBERT L. CARTER 
Secretory Assistant Counsel 

ALFRED BAKER LEWIS ARNOLD de MILLE 
Treasurer Press Relations 

FOR IMME DIATE RELEASE November 15,1957 

DALLAS, TEXAS. --The U.S. Court of Appeals was asked last Saturday to 

affirm a district court ruling which ordered the Dallas public schools to admit 

Negro students beginning with the 1957-58 mid-winter term. 

The district court on September 9, ordered the Dallas School Board to admit 

the Negro students as of the mid-winter 1957-58 term "on the same terms and 

conditions as though they were members of the white race." The order was 

issued after the Court of Appeals had on two previous occasions overruled the 

district court's findings and sent the case back for further consideration. 

The Dallas School Board objected to the order setting forth the date for the 

end of segregation in its public schools and on October 25, appealed to the U.S. 

Court of Appeals on the grounds that the lower court abused its discretion, 

Attorneys for the Negro students, in a brief filed here Saturday, November 9, 

with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, maintained that the district 

court did not abuse its discretion in setting a date for the beginning of 

desegregation in the city public schools. 

The case was originally filed with the district court on September 12, 1955, but 

was dismissed without a hearing on the basis that the Negro school facilities 

were "equal," 

On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal and sent the case back 

to the district court, directing that court to afford the parties full hearing on the 

issues, 

The district court, after a full hearing, dismissed the case for the second time 

on the grouud that the separate facilities were equal and crowded conditions 

required continued segregation. 

On the second appeal by attorneys for the Negro students, the Court of Appeals 

reversed the ruling and ordered the district court to enjoin the school board 

from requiring segregation of the races in any school under they supervision with 

all deliberate speed. The district court, in compliance, ordered the end of 

segregation by the 1957-58 mid-winter term. 

Attorneys for the Negro students are Louis Bedford, C.B. Bunkley,Jr., W.J. 

Durham and U.S. Tate of Dallas, and Robert L. Carter and Thurgood Marshall of 

New York. 
=a Ora

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Dallas, Texas. -- The U.S. Court of Appeals

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in