The American Tobacco Company v. Patterson and American Brands v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Entries of Appearance; Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Public Court Documents
January 15, 1981

Cite this item

The American Tobacco Company v. Patterson and American Brands v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Entries of Appearance; Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

The American Tobacco Company, Tobacco Workers' International Union, and Local 182 of Tobacco Workers' International Union v. Patterson and American Brands v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Entries of Appearance; Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 6559ddb6-b79a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. Legal Defense Fund Scores Major School Integration Breakthrough, 1964. 469aec8b-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5732e4ab-2066-4868-969a-7326e209defb/legal-defense-fund-scores-major-school-integration-breakthrough. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    10 Columbus Circle 

New York, N.Y. 10019 
JUdson 6-8397 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 

De Allan Knight Chalmers 

Director-Counsel 

Jack Greenberg 
June 19, 1964 Associate Counsel 

Constance Baker Motley 

LEGAL DEFENSE FUND SCORES MAJOR 
SCHOOL INTEGRATION BREAKTHROUGH 

NEW YORK, N.Y.--A major breakthrough in school integration took 
place yesterday when a federal district court put an end to 
"private" schools and tuition grants often utilized by southern 
communities seeking to avoid integration, 

Jack Greenberg, director-counsel, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 
which won the ruling, today applauded that order, which "closes 
the door on attempts at ending the '54 school segregation de- 
cision via the school closings and tuition grant tactics. 

"We will move quickly to apply it whenever such efforts at 
school integration evasion occur anywhere in the south, where 
we are currently pressing 82 separate school integration actions 
in 14 states. 

_ "This decision will alter the southern school integration 
picture in hard core ares," he said. 

The ruling referred to came down yesterday in the U.S. 
District Court for the eastern district of Va. Judge John D. 
Butzner Jr. said that the Surry County school board may no 
longer process or approve "any applications from persons re- 
siding in Surry County for state or county scholarships for 
use in any school that discriminates in admission and educa- 
tion of pupils on the basis of race." 

In addition, Judge Butzner decreed that the school board may 
no longer use race as a criteria in "assignment, placement, 
transfer, admission, enrollment or education of any child in 
and to any public school or any child's use of any facility 
owned or controlled by the School Board." 

White students in Surry County have been attending "pri- 
vate" schools on scholarship, while Negroes attended their 
all-colored "public" schools. 

The case was argued by Henry L. Marsh III and Samuel W. 
Tucker, NAACP Legal Defense Fund cooperating attorneys of 
Richmond, Va. 

Pee oe 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

The American Tobacco Company v. Patterson and American Brands v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Entries of Appearance; Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the United States of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in