Suit Filed to Require Enforcement of Negro Voting Rights through Reapportionment
Press Release
May 28, 1963
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Suit Filed to Require Enforcement of Negro Voting Rights through Reapportionment, 1963. e46c6336-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/04b5844a-27db-4f50-ad4c-2f561e481396/suit-filed-to-require-enforcement-of-negro-voting-rights-through-reapportionment. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
PRESS RELEASE @ @
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND
TO COLUMBUS CIRCLE «+ NEW YORK19,N.Y. © JUdson6-8397
DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS JACK GREENBERG CONSTANCE BAKER MOTLEY
President Director-Counsel ; Associate Counsel
SUIT FILED TO REQUIRE ENFORCEMENT oa
OF NEGRO VOTING RIGHTS THROUGH REAPPORTIONMENT
May 28,1963
NEW YORK -- NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys sued two government
officials today on behalf of Negro and white plaintiffs to require the
government to enforce Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Secretary of Commerce Luther Hodges and Director of the Bureau of
the Census Richard M, Scammon are named as defendants. The suit was
filed in the federal district court for the District of Columbia this
morning.
The suit seeks to protect voting rights of Negro citizens in
southern states. Under Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment, any
state which denies the right to vote to a portion of its eligible
citizens loses representation in Congress in proportion to the percent-
age of voters denied. The Section has never been enforced.
Today's suit is the first legal attempt to have this provision
of the Fourteenth Amendment enforced.
Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the Legal Defense Fund said:
"Until recently the issue presented in this case may have been viewed
as a political question, but this objection has, we believe, been
overcome by Baker v. Carr, the reapportionment case." Mr. Greenberg
added that he hoped the courts would view the Fund suit in the same
way as Baker v. Carr.
The suit asks that the Secretary of Commerce and Director of the
Bureau of the Census:
(1) “take all necessary and proper steps to prepare to compile
figures as to the denial and abridgment of the right to vote at the
next decennial census," and
(2) "transmit an apportionment based on figures in accordance
with Section II of the Fourteenth Amendment."
On February 28, 1963 one of the plaintiffs, Mrs. Daisy E. Lampkin
of Pittsburgh, wrote Secretary of Commerce Hodges complaining of
the failure of the Department to take action to carry out Section II
in the face of wide-spread denial of the right to vote in many southern
states. The complaint states she received a reply from Mr. Scammon
on March 8th which said though the Constitution provides for certain
functions, this does aot necessarily insure their being carried
out unless Congress gives special legislative authoritys He added,
"even then, unless necessary funds are appropriated by Congress
for this special activity there is no way any government agency
can proceed to carry out the necessary Job." No further action
followed urs. Lampkin's letter.
The twentyefive plaintiffs are both Negro and white. They
are from six northern states: Peansylvania, Massachusetts, Missouri
Illinois, Ohio and California; and three southern states: Virginia,
Mississippi, and Louisiana.
The complaint alleges that the southern states would be
likely to lose at least one congressman each if Section II were
enforced while the six northern states would each be likely to
gain at least onc congressman.
The suit cites as an abridgement of the right to vote the
existence of a poll tax in Virginia, Mississippi, Alabama, arkan=
sas and Texas. Literacy and constitutional interpretation tests
in Louisiana and Mississippi are also attacked as violations of
the Fourteenth ameridment.
The Civil Rights Commission and Department of Justice are
said to have data which proves that "numerous non-whites are
consistently denied and abridged the right to vote by these
educational and other requirements."
The complaint further alleges that in 1960, in Louisiana,
465,556 Negroes over 21 were not registered to vote, 69% of the
total non-registered eligibles. In contrast, only 396, 108 whites
over 21 were not registered, or 27% of the total.
The complaint also mentions 2 1959 report of the Civil Rights
Commission citing 158 counties in 10 southern states with a
majority of Negroes. In 51 of these only 3% of the Negroes are
registered. In only 11 of these counties are 30% or more Negroes
registered to vote.
NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys representing the Negro
plaintiffs are dilliam B. Bryant of Jasnington, D. C., Jack
Greenberg, Constance Baker Motley, James M. Nabrit, III, and
Michacl Meltsner of New York City.
Paes