Alabama Justice of Peace May Not "Pocket" Fines
Press Release
February 12, 1966
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Alabama Justice of Peace May Not "Pocket" Fines, 1966. cfa90bba-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/078367f5-1714-4923-b689-998f5528ff60/alabama-justice-of-peace-may-not-pocket-fines. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle
New York, N.Y. 10019
JUdson 6-8397
Legal Defense and Educational Fund
PRESS RELEASE
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
FOR RELEASE
Saturday,
February 12, 1966
Director-Counsel
Jack Greenberg
ALA, JUSTICE OF PEACE
MAY NOT "POCKET" FINES
MONTGOMERY---Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund today
praised "a landmark ruling" by a three-judge federal court in
Montgomery, which "takes the profit out of prosecuting civil rights
workers", according to Jack Greenberg, director-counsel,.
The court said Alabama Justices of the Peace may no longer
personally collect fines levied against plaintiffs.
"The decision is bound to have wide impact across the entire
state, where civil rights workers in particular have been singled
out for extreme penalties, under color of law, by Justices ‘of the
Peace who usually are not trained in the law." Mr. Greenberg
continued.
"The court has ended this practice and in so doing ends a
system of legal procedure which has denied state defendants a fair
trial under Alabama law."
Similar suits are now pending in Mississippi. Mr. Greenberg
also announced that staff attorneys will follow up this victory
with additional Justice of the Peace suits in Alabama, so as to
entrench this important precedent.
The same legal argument will be extended to other states where
this practice is carried on.
This case grew out of the arrest of John Hulett, civil rights
activist, in October, 1965 on a charge of reckless driving.
He was brought before Justice of the Peace J. B. Julian in
Lowndes County and ordered to stand trial.
Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a complaint and motions
for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in
Federal District Court,
The deciding three-judge court quoted with goproves an earlier
Supreme Court case, saying that the act of trying Mr, Hulett would
"violate the 14th Amendment and deprive a defendant (Mr. Hulett) in
a criminal case of due process of law to subject (him and) his
liberty or property to the judgement of a court--the judge of which
has direct, personal, substantial, and pecuniary interest in reaching
a conclusion against him in his case."
Legal Defense Fund attorneys were Solomon Seay, Jr., of
Montgomery and Jack Greenberg, Charles H. Jones and Melvyn Zarr of
New York City.
=-30-
Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Inf ion—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 ES