Alabama Justice of Peace May Not "Pocket" Fines
Press Release
February 12, 1966

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. Alabama Justice of Peace May Not "Pocket" Fines, 1966. cfa90bba-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/078367f5-1714-4923-b689-998f5528ff60/alabama-justice-of-peace-may-not-pocket-fines. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President Hon. Francis E. Rivers FOR RELEASE Saturday, February 12, 1966 Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg ALA, JUSTICE OF PEACE MAY NOT "POCKET" FINES MONTGOMERY---Attorneys of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund today praised "a landmark ruling" by a three-judge federal court in Montgomery, which "takes the profit out of prosecuting civil rights workers", according to Jack Greenberg, director-counsel,. The court said Alabama Justices of the Peace may no longer personally collect fines levied against plaintiffs. "The decision is bound to have wide impact across the entire state, where civil rights workers in particular have been singled out for extreme penalties, under color of law, by Justices ‘of the Peace who usually are not trained in the law." Mr. Greenberg continued. "The court has ended this practice and in so doing ends a system of legal procedure which has denied state defendants a fair trial under Alabama law." Similar suits are now pending in Mississippi. Mr. Greenberg also announced that staff attorneys will follow up this victory with additional Justice of the Peace suits in Alabama, so as to entrench this important precedent. The same legal argument will be extended to other states where this practice is carried on. This case grew out of the arrest of John Hulett, civil rights activist, in October, 1965 on a charge of reckless driving. He was brought before Justice of the Peace J. B. Julian in Lowndes County and ordered to stand trial. Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a complaint and motions for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in Federal District Court, The deciding three-judge court quoted with goproves an earlier Supreme Court case, saying that the act of trying Mr, Hulett would "violate the 14th Amendment and deprive a defendant (Mr. Hulett) in a criminal case of due process of law to subject (him and) his liberty or property to the judgement of a court--the judge of which has direct, personal, substantial, and pecuniary interest in reaching a conclusion against him in his case." Legal Defense Fund attorneys were Solomon Seay, Jr., of Montgomery and Jack Greenberg, Charles H. Jones and Melvyn Zarr of New York City. =-30- Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Inf ion—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 ES