A U.S. federal court today ordered the Harford County of Board Education…

Clinton v. Jeffers Motion to Dismiss preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Topic
- Political Participation
Notable Person
- Julius Chambers
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Clinton v. Jeffers
Case
- Clinton v. Jeffers
U.S. state
- Arkansas
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 0137e9ce-ad9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Loose Pages. A U.S. federal court today ordered the Harford County of Board Education…, 1960. d4203a99-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/56351b76-55c1-41d5-b389-cd9aa558a4d0/a-us-federal-court-today-ordered-the-harford-county-of-board-education. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE ® @ 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
10 COLUMBUS CIRCLE «© NEW YORK 19,N.Y. © JUdson 6-8397 

DR. ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS oa THURGOOD MARSHALL 
President Director-Counsel 

BALTIMORE, MD., May 25.--A U. S. federal court today ordered the 

Harford County Board of Education to admit a Negro student, who was 

recently barred from the Aberdeen, Md. High School, to the 10th grade 

at the 1960-61 term. 

The student, Alvin Dwight Pettit, a 14 year old 9th grader who 

moved to Aberdeen last year, applied for admission to the 1959-60 

school term last summer. He was rejected because the Harford Board 

of Education's stair-step desegregation plan did not include the grade 

to which he sought admission. 

The Harford County Board of Education's stair-step plan is 

described as piecemeal and complicated. It provides for desegregation 

at some grade levels in certain schools but different grades at other 

schools, The plan did not include desegregation of the 9th grade at 

Aberdeen High School at the time Pettit applied. Integration of the 

9th grade is scheduled to begin with the 1960-61 school term. The 

10th grade will not be desegregated until 1961-62. 

The plan, however, does provide for the acceptance of students 

who, in the judgment of the school authorities, can make "satisfactory 

adjustment" in the classes to which they seek admission. According 

to the attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund who 

appeared in behalf of the Negro student, his past school performance 

was about that of the average student at Aberdeen High School. 

The court ruled today that the Negro student is entitled to a 

chance to make good at Aberdeen High School and should have been per- 

mitted to enroll at the time he applied, 

NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys for Pettit are Juanita 

Jackson Mitchell and Tucker Dearing, both of Baltimore, Md., Thurgood 

Marshall and Jack Greenberg of New York City. 

21 90-—

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Clinton v. Jeffers Motion to Dismiss

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in