Construction Worker Discrimination Suit Against New Jersey Unions and Contractors
Press Release
December 12, 1969
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Construction Worker Discrimination Suit Against New Jersey Unions and Contractors, 1969. a222e3e4-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0791ea5e-9109-4596-af4e-67874106ba13/construction-worker-discrimination-suit-against-new-jersey-unions-and-contractors. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
$5 h
4
President F
Hon.. y FE PRESS RELEASE Director-Cou egal efense und Jack G. ~
Director, Pub. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 « JUdson 6-8397
ioe
LDF SUES LABOR UNIONS December 12, 1969 AND BLDG. CONTRACTORS § FOR IMMEDIATE RELE
NEWARK, NEW JERSEY~---Attorneys for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund have filed suits in Federal Court in Newark on behalf of four Negro construction workers, against three construction unions and
three building contractors.
The suits arise out of the refusal of the unions and the con- tractors to hire experienced Negroes for jobs on the construction of the New Jersey College of Medicine in Newark. This large medical complex will be financed completely by Federal funds and will be located in the heart of the Negro Ghetto of Newark. It was the issue of Negro employment on this project that caused the devastating riots of July 1967.
The suits seek the following remedies:
1) a declaratory judgment that the action
of the defendant officers of the State
and Federal Government, violated the
rights of the plaintiffs and the class
they represent;
2) A permanent injunction against the
awarding of any further contracts to
the contractors involved until the
employment practices complained of
in the complaint are so revised as
to entirely eliminate the aforesaid
policy and practice of racial discri-
mination;
3) Enjoin the unions mentioned in the
complaint from continuing or main-
taining the policy practice, custom
and usage referred to in the com-
plaint, of discriminating against
the plaintiffs and the class they
represent;
4) Enjoin the above unions to open their
membership to and refer for employ-
ment all qualified black journeymen
and apprentices seeking work;
5) Grant plaintiffs an award of money
representing the difference between
what they actually made in other
employment and what they would have
mace if they had been properly re-
ferred by defendant unions for
employment from May 12, 1969 to the
time relief is granted in this case;
6) Allow plaintiffs their court costs,
reasonable attorneys' fees and grant
such further additional or alternative
relief as may appear to this court as
fair and just.
LDF attorney Lowell Johnston will handle the details of the
@ase and conduct the argument.
25 -30-
renin |