Jackson v. Marvell School District Petition for Rehearing

Public Court Documents
October 16, 1969

Cite this item

Jackson v. Marvell School District Petition for Rehearing preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Topic
- Education
Notable Person
- Jack Greenberg
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- af2e2df2-b89a-ee11-be36-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 5. National Highway Construction Law Ignored in Tennessee, LDF Advises U.S. Court of Appeals, 1967. f10cdc51-b892-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f08c96a1-32ac-4b36-b6b9-4ef021a7fdbc/national-highway-construction-law-ignored-in-tennessee-ldf-advises-us-court-of-appeals. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    President 
Hon. Francis E. Rivers 

PRESS RELEASE pecs 
egal efense lund Jack Greenberg 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Bien Fete Baars 
Jesse DeVore, Jr. 
NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 

FOR RELEASE 
FRIDAY 
DECEMBER 8, 1967 

NATIONAL HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION 
LAW IGNORED IN TENNESSEE, LDF 
ADVISES U.S. COURT OF APPEALS 

Fisk, Meharry, Vanderbilt and others in Jeopardy 

CINCINNATI---NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., (LDF) at- 
torneys will appear here today in the U.S. Court of Appeals in an at- 
tempt to permanently halt construction of an interstate highway 
through the Negro district of Nashville, Tenn. 

LDF Director-Counsel, Jack Greenberg, will argue that the proposed 
path of Interstate-40 would bring "destruction and irreparable damage 
to Negro-owned businesses, colleges, universities, schools, churches 
and residential areas." 

LDF attorneys won a temporary restraining order three weeks ago against 
construction of the highway. 

Their complaint names Governor Buford Ellington, Highways Commissioner 
Charles W. Spright, and Nashville Mayor Beverly Briley. 

LDF attorneys will today tell the Appeals Court that: 

* the Federal Highway Act requires that state highway departments 
consider adverse economic effects, on local communities, as a 
determining factor in plotting highway routes. Tennessee, they 
maintain, did not 

a no public hearing was held to discuss construction plans prior 
to their approval and implementation 

* the highway was arbitrarily routed through the Negro district 

* the routing was not coordinated with any comprehensive plan of 
land use 

* the Negro community was denied due process and equal protection 
of the law as required under the 14th Amendment. 

LDF attorneys are representing the Nashville I-40 Steering Committee, 
an unincorporated group of Negro and white citizens formed to protect 
the North Nashville section of the city. 

Among the institutions represented on the Committee are Fisk and Van- 
derbilt Universities, Scarritt, George Peabody, and Meharry Medical 
Colleges, and St. Vincent dePaul Parish and School. 

Others include the Metropolitan Human Relations Committee, Nashville 
Christian Leadership Conference, the Baptist Sunday School Publishing 
Board, and numerous local church groups. 

LDF attorney Avon Williams is the local counsel. He is joined by LDF 
Director-Counsel Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles H. Jones, Ties 
and Michael Davidson, all of New York City. 

=302 

NOTE: The NAACP Legal Defense and Educztional Fund, Inc. (LDF) is a 
separate and distinct organization from the NAACP. Its correct desig- 
nation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., which is 
shortened to L.D.F.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Jackson v. Marvell School District Petition for Rehearing

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in