Memorandum in Brief of Respondents in Reply to Petitioner's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment

Working File
February 24, 1984

Cite this item

Memorandum in Brief of Respondents in Reply to Petitioner's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Bozeman v. Lambert

LDF Attorney
- Lani Guinier
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- Bozeman v. Lambert
Case
- Bozeman v. Lambert
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Case Files
Creator
- Lani Guinier & Others
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 8b2fa26b-ed92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873

Cite this item

Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Letter from Menefee to Judge Thompson RE: Status of Settlement and Estimate of Trial Time, 1986. 65562137-b9d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2b6a6f4d-d5dd-4302-ac9a-26d24ce0b201/letter-from-menefee-to-judge-thompson-re-status-of-settlement-and-estimate-of-trial-time. Accessed April 06, 2025.

Copied!

    BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A. 

ATTORNEYS AT LAw 

405 VAN ANTWERP BUILDING 

  

P. DO. BOX 1051 

MOBILE, ALABAMA 36633-1051 

JAMES LU. BLACKSHER TELEPHONE 

LARRY T. MENEFEE June 12, 1986 (205) 433-2000 
GREGORY B. STEIN 

WANDA J. COCHRAN 

Honorable Myron H. Thompson 
Judge, Middle District of Alabama 

P. O. Box 2385 
Montgomery, AL 36101 

RE: Dillard, et al. v. Crenshaw County, Alabama, et al. 

Civil Action No. 85-T-1332-N 
  

Dear Judge Thompson: 

As requested by the Court we are reporting to Your Honor on the 
status of settlement discussions and an estimate of trial time. 

We have spoken with all of the attorneys concerning settlement. 
At this point, I must regretably report that settlement is 
doubtful with any county though it is early in the discussions 
and they are continuing. 

Our best estimate is that plaintiffs will need two to three days 
to present their case. We intend to present both the intgent and 
results case. 

very respectfully, 

BLACKSHER, MENEFEE & STEIN, P.A. 

  

4 LL a 

—Zarry TL Lonel: 
LTM nw 

ce Terry G. Davis, Esq. 
Deborah Fins, Esq. 
Julius L. Chambers, Esq. 
Edward Still, Esq. 
Reo Kirkland, Jr., Esq. 
Alton L. Turner, Esq. 
HE. BR. Burnham, Esg. 
Warren Rowe, Esq. 
James W. Webb, Esq. 

 



  

Lee T. Otts, Esq. 
Jack Floyd, Esq. 
D. I. Martin, Esq. 

David R. Boyd, Esq. 
James G. Speake, Esq. 
¥. O. Rirk, dr., Esq. 

Barry D. Vaughn, Esq. 
Yetta G. Samford, Esq.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Memorandum in Brief of Respondents in Reply to Petitioner's Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment

LDF Attorney

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in