Jeffers v. Clinton Complaint
Working File
January 27, 1989

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman v. Pickens County Board of Education. Jeffers v. Clinton Complaint, 1989. 77e089ba-f192-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0b77827c-696f-45f3-b340-44dc7756182c/jeffers-v-clinton-complaint. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
I I THE N E W YORK TIMBS, SUNDAY, JULY 21, 1985 E21 · WASHINGTC)N lJB.mes Reston ·, Presidents, DoctOrs, Reporters ···· r. . -. WASHINGTON the popular. idea that the cpnfidential found a polyp in his eolon that was nqt The President is back at ·the ~lationship between doctor and pa- . malignant but a warning sign. ' White House, to everyone's re- tient also applies when the patient is . The' White House dOctor then was Th. e' 'pu' blt"c's' lief, buthisaidesar~stillsoreat •President of the United States. Daniel Ruge. We don't know what ·. · · . the press for asking all those ques- The health of a President is nor what Dr. Ruge's advice was ·at that~ . • ht tions about his .medical record. They merely a private but a public con- time; but ·Lahy S~kes·, the White rtg . say it's "distasteful" io intrude into cern, as Mr. Reagan ·recognized l)y House spokesman, whose manners t kn. the pri,vate relations between adoctor authorizing the disclosure of the most are no better than his 111emories of - 0 0 W and his patient.· intimate-details of his cancer opera- history, said -he-would not make Dr: Maybe so. The only trouble is that tion. ~ut there are two problems. Ruge "available for questioning/' this is precisely what the White House . · The first is that the people get almost again on the grotind of confidential · said when they were covering up the too many medical facts about a Presi- doctor-patient relations. . _ issue of his age, which was the . one illnesses of WOOdrow Wilson and dent's .illness in the White House, and In any event, nothing was done about thing he feared the mos~.. . . . Franklin Roosevelt. too few flbout the state of his health be- · thai first medical . warning, and there. So what? Was it a medical decision All would be well, they said. Besides, fore he gets there. And the second is are two theories here about that. or a political decision? Nobody but the questions were not only "distaste- that they seem indifferent to ~he health The firs( is that Mr. Reagan didn't the PreSident really knows. ( ful" but painful. Since then, the histo- of Presidential candidates during the take the news -all tha,t seriously, and What we do know is that the White rians, With good reason, have con- election campaign. · didn't really want to think about it. The · House is now saying- and you can't demned the press for · misleading the The facts in :president Reagan's second is th;:tt he thought vaguely abOut ' blame them at this late date - that people~ · · case. are not in dispute. Everybody it, but decided it was no big deat. Aild if there was never really any discussion The intention here is not to s\lggest knew he-was no spring chicken, His he went- into the hospital to have it re- in 1984 of the President's health in that. President Reagan's illnesS is as doctors told him in March of 1984, at moved, even if ·the doctors found noth- relatiQn to the re-election campaign, serious as Wilson's in 1919 or Roose- the beginning of the last Presidential i ing else, it would be front-Jiage news . which . is propably true. But I why , velt's)~ 1944, but merely to question ___ ~lection· campaigil, that tl_ley had_ . and raise in U,e election campaigri the wasn~t the ma~er discussed? This is ~:~ ' - l • one of many . unanswered questions. term, inCluding Mamie, who told him~ It's interesting to compare all this his health would be cared for better in' with how President Eisenhower dealt ·th-e White House than anyplace else; with the health-and~age issue after he all except his brother Milton, who in- had a heart attack and before he de- sisted to the end, and lost, that . Ike - cided to run for a second term. shoultl quit While he was ahead. On Jan. 13,- 1956, he invitCd several '. Again, ·. personal and historical members of his Cabinet to dinner at the analogies are reckless if not treacher-~ . White House. Among them were Secre- ous. But at least Ike tried to make a tary of State Dulles and, Secretary ·of · rational and orderly tranSition of , J;he Treasury Humphrey; his chief of ·Presidential-power and, wondered, _as staff, She:rm~ Adam$.; Henry Cabot he tolp me one night, that ma~be _ Lodge, Jim Hagerty, his press sec~e- - th-ere should be some outside panel of . tary, and his brother Milton. doctors that could consider or COJi,. The President placed before them ·. firm the health problems of Pre5iden the detail¢<~ medical repOrts ot his tial candidates before it was too late _. · dQCtors, and asked some hard ques- Anybody who's interested in ·ii.he;' tions·: What if _he died during the <:am- problem of Presidential illness, ~d paign, or shortly after. the election if how to deal with it while the Presi~ he won? Who would be left behind? dent is recovering, should read Ste lle mentioned· some possible succes- phen Ambrose's excellent biograpb.y- . ;sors. He went round the table asking . of "Eisenhower- The President.!'-It each one what he should do. makes you think, which is not n~: .~1 said he should go for a seCond sarily a bad idea. d :p - . ~ · ·-:..: .. Reag:an'sinflate~the-Deficit Game \ ' ... ' ·• . ~ . .. '\ ' . . ...... "' ..... . )<-~ _-2~: ------~.,....,...-,..------,.... · we run out of voice and breath. ·Or we By Daniel Patrick Moynihan can cure their extravagance by sim; ply reducing their allowance." WASHINGTON' · This statement was noticed by Re- T heweek of July 8 began publican conser.va~ives : 'What was with the announcement this business of deliberately creating that David A. Stock- , ' a Republican deiicit? As it happened, man would be leaving a new economics was at hand to show as budget director and that this need not happen. Known as ended with the Senate "supply-side," it held that cutting Judiciary Committee approving two taxeS would increase revenues. A few constitutional amendments requiring weeks after the President's speech, a 'balanced budget. This marks the the· Office of ~anagement and transition froll;l policy to panic. It sug- Budget issued revised budget projec- gests we pause for a moment's reflec- tions sho~ taxes going down and tion. receipts going up; almost doubling First, some definitions. The policy from $520 billion in 1980 to $940 billion was -the Administration's deliberate in !986. · 'i'he driviJ?.g; motive· has, been . to dismantle 50 years' social legislation decision to create deficits for Strate- , Well) ' of course none of this hap- gic, political purposes. The panic ,' pened. The budget was not balanced change: "The basic .fact is that we arises among those who.think the in 1984 as promised. Rather, by that · are violating badly, even wantonJ.y, deficit was caused instead by 'a fail- time, Mr .. Stockman was talking the cardinal rule of sound public fi ure of our political sygtem. : 'about $200 billion deficits "as far as naitce: Governments must extract The Reagan Administration came to office with, at most, a marginal in- the eye can see." from the people in taxes· what they There are plenty of reasons the dispense in benefits, services and pro terest iii balancing the budget- con- strategy camr to grief, but the least tections . . . indeed, if, the [Securities trary to rhetoric, there was no great budget problem at the time _ but noticed is tha the budget committees and Exchange Commission] had with a very .real interest in disman- just: couldn:t deliver. Successive jurisdiction over the executive and tling a fair amount of the social legis- chairmen, especially in the Senate, legislative branches, many of us lation of the preceditig 50 years .. The tried to transform the process from a would be in jail." . strategy was to induce a deficit and straightforward allocation of funds · This is taking too much blame. It _ use that as· gro\m~ for the· disman- · for 19 "budget functionS" into an was ·an honest effort, simply too tling. item-by-item decision on everything. clever: A failing, they say, of intellec- It was a strategy devis~ by young Committee ·meetings became specta- tuals in Government. intellectuals of a capacity that Wash- · cles: dazed legislators, swarming The constitutional amendments ar,e irigton had not seen for years. They_ · staff, exhausted journalists. another matter. Theyreflectakindof were never understood, and as _they . Then it collapsed. Other commit- desperation : Don't let tis do it again. depart they leave behiiid an alarming tees stopPed paying any heed. The Which quite misses the point. The '• '7 ( . incomprehension of the coup they al- Senate Budget Committee itself deficit was· policy, a curious legacy of most pulled off. - · broke apart. In 1982, the chairman in the young radicals who came to t . " The key concept was that individ- effect gave up and settled for a party- power in but . ua1 Gpve~: p...mgrams ara.rel~eN.ote on.a-0ne-page-budget resolu~oo ~ ~ tiv:. ely iiiViilnerable_ to dir~t assa~t. tion with about a dozen ilumbe:-> on it The budget is now out of control for The Congress, the staff, the constitu- that nobody bothered to examme be- the moment. Debt service was $53 bil: ency can usually beat you and always cause by then nobody believed any of lion in 1980; it will ~ $234 billion by outwait you. . . it_any ,more. . 1991)._ The debt is compounding; we On the other hand, the Budget Act On June 5, 1985, Mr. Stockman told will indeed in time be borrowin8 of 1974 contained li~le understood the board of the New York Stock -Ex- abroad to pay interest owed powers of huge potential. 11b.e budget abroad. · . . · committees, assumiilg agreement by . We can do little about this in tlie the~ Congress, cpuld require other near-term. It is now, at miilimum, a committees to C\1~ back p,rograll?-~· . D. Y·. sfu_nction: 15-year problem." On the bright side, . ~ ~er-~cally a · reconcl11- the Social Security Trust Funds begir) atlon mstruction - ~ad never been . f th . . to grow rapidly after 1988, reaching .. used to the fullest: but .It was there. 0 e an estimated $1 trillion surplus by Thus, the pi~. Reduce revenues. polt"tt"cal 1999. The dark prospect is that some Create a defiCit. Use the budget pro- d · · t t" · the l990's willaive cess to eliminate programs. a mm1s ~a ton m . <>: . A hidden strategy? Not. really. On economy up and w1pe out the debt by mflatmg Feb. 5, 1981, 16 days in office, the the c~ency. . , President in his first television ad- • · t · - But 1f there 1sn t much we can do, dress to the nation said: ·~There were lS no a there are things we -~ learn._ Prin~- always thos'e who told u5 that taxes · t ·. f pally, that the dysfunctiOn of the poht;, couldn't be cut until spending was re- . s ym p om 0 ic~l. economy is n?~ a symptom of a duced. Well,youknow, wecanlecture a f~t}t" 4-.g - f~thtlg of the poht1cal system. The our children about extravagance until c;.u. 11 dtsaster was planned, although not as a di~ter. If we can get a truly con- Daniel Patrick Moynihan, New York Democrat, is a member of the Senate Budget Committee. _SyStem servative Administration into office by the 1990's, we can probably restore stabilitybytheyear2000. 0