Dillard v. Town of Notasulga Motion to Dismiss; Correspondence from Dunne to Schmitt
Public Court Documents
March 8, 1994

6 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Dillard v. Town of Notasulga Motion to Dismiss; Correspondence from Dunne to Schmitt, 1994. 78d8b043-b8d8-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0dcfe822-3194-400a-8568-889b1adcd1ee/dillard-v-town-of-notasulga-motion-to-dismiss-correspondence-from-dunne-to-schmitt. Accessed April 06, 2025.
Copied!
Day ALA Str Schmitt & Harper A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION STEVEN F. SCHMITT ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. 0. BOX 606 MICHAEL S. HARPER 213 BARNETT BOULEVARD TELEPHONE (205) 283-6855 JOHN G. SMITH TALLASSEE, ALABAMA 36078 FAX (205) 283-6858 March 8, 1994 Honorable Thomas C. Caver Clerk, District Court Post Office Box 711 Montgomery, AL 36101 RE: John Dillard, et a. vs. Town of Notasulga C.A. No. 87-T-1268-N Dear Mr. Caver: Enclosed, please find the original of the "Town of Notasulga’s Motion to Dismiss" to be filed in your office with regards to the above matter. I have enclosed an extra copy to be marked "filed" and returned to my attention. If you have any questions or if you need any further documentation, please let me know. Ve truly yours, STEVEN F. SCHMITT SFS/ac Enclosures cc/Mayor Cecil Langford Edward Still games U. Blacksher Julius Chambers Mort P. Ames U.S. Department of Justice tA yw: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION JOHN DILLARD, ET AL PLAINTIFFS VS. C.A. NO. 87-T-1268-N TOWN OF NOTASULGA, DEFENDANT TOWN OF NOTASULGA’S MOTION TO DISMISS Comes now the Town of Notasulga and moves this Court for an order dismissing it as a party defendant in the above action. As grounds for this motion, Town of Notasulga would show the following: 1. On May 19, 1992, Town of Notasulga submitted its proposed redistricting plan based upon the 1990 census. The plan was attached as Exhibit "A" to the filing made that date. 2. On July 20, 1992, counsel for the Town of Notasulga received a letter dated July 13, 1992 from the U.S. Justice Department, Civil Rights Division. This letter stated in part that: "The Attorney General does not interpose any objection to the specified change." The change referred to in said letter is the Exhibit "A" earlier filed with this Court. A copy of the letter from the U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division dated July 13, 1992 is attached to this motion as Exhibit "B". 3. The proposed redistricting plan, Exhibit "A" was followed by the Town of Notasulga during its municipal elections 1 held August 25, 1992. Those individuals elected as a result of the municipal elections were scheduled to take office and in fact did take office on the first Monday of October, 1992, i.e. October 5, 1992. | Wherefore, the above premises considered, the Town of Notasulga moves this Court to: 3. Approve the redistricting plan, Exhibit "A", which has been precleared by the Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division on July 13, 1992. 2. Order that those individuals elected pursuant to the August 25, 1992 municipal elections or any "run-off" resulting therefrom be declared the duly elected officials of the Town of Notasulga to take office effective October 5, 1992. 33 Dismiss the Town of Notasulga as a party defendant in this case. 4. Order any further or additional relief to which the Town of Notasulga is entitled in this matter. SCHMITT & HARPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION P.O. Box 606 ey 213 Barnett Boulevard ) Tallassee, AL 36078 STEVEN F. SCHMITT Telephone: 205/283-6855 Attorney for Town of Notasulga CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this 8th day of March, 1994, mailed a copy of the foregoing document to Edward Still, Esquire, 714 South 29th Street, Birmingham, AL 35233-2845; James U. Blacksher, Esquire, Fifth Floor, Title Building, 300 21st Street North, Birmingham, AL 35203; Julius Chambers, NAACP Legal Defense Fund, 99 Hudson Street, New York, NY 10013; Mort P. Ames, Esquire, Deputy Attorney General, Alabama State House, 11 South Union Street, Montgomery, AL 36130 and U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Voting Section, P.O. Box 66128, Washington, D.C. 20035-6128, by United States Mail, postage prepaid. Fong OF COUNSEL * U.S. Department of 0. EXHIBIT 'B Civil Rights Division JRD:LLT:CMS:1r 3 Voting Section DJ 166-012-3 PO. Box 66128 92-2340 Washington, D.C. 20035-6128 Steven F. Schmitt, Esq. Schmitt & Harper P. O. Box 606 Tallassee, Alabama 36078 Dear Mr. Schmitt: This refers to the 1992 redistricting plan for the Town of Notasulga in Lee and Macon Counties, Alabama, submitted to the Attorney General pursuant to Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973c. We received your submission on May 14, 1992. The Attorney General does not interpose any objection to the specified change. However, we note that Section 5 expressly provides that the failure of the Attorney General to object does not bar subsequent litigation to enjoin the enforcement of the change. See the Procedures for the Administration of Section 5 (28 C.F.R. 81.41). We note that a proper submission of a voting change for Section 5 review should be addressed to the Chief, Voting Section, Civil Rights Division, P. O. Box 66128, Washington, D.C. 20035-6128. The envelope and first page should be marked: Submission under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. Transmittal of your correspondence to any other office may delay the processing of your request. Sincerely, John R. Dunne Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Divisio ov: lin ¥. Steven H. Rosenbaum Chief, Voting Section SCHMITT & HARPER A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ATTORNEYS AT LAW P. 0. BOX 606 TALLASSEE, ALABAMA 36078 Julius Chambers NAACP Legal Defense Fund 89 Hudson Street New York, New York 10013