Bill Robinson Interview Transcript
Oral History

49 pages
This item is featured in:
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 2. Selma Background 3, 1965. 32b6eac1-b592-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/7cfeea33-26ba-4a9b-b17b-4c93a71e36e3/selma-background-3. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 NAACP ‘Legal Defense and Educational F und PRESS RELEASES ~~ President ay id Dr. Allan Knight oe Director-Counsel 3 Jack Creenberg ca € MEMORANDUM March 1965 FROM: Public Information Department NAACP Legal Defense Fund RE? BACKGROUND ON LITIGATION IN ALABAMA March ll, IAACP Legal Defense Fund Attorneys filed a 1965 "Plaintiffs! Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order Against Plaintiffs. In reference to the demonstrators continuing to exercise their rights as American citizens, without interference from the District Court, or Alabama law officials, the motion stated: ... "It is clear that the threat of violence or other public disturbance acainst persons seeking to exercise peacefully a constitutionally protected rights is not = a ground for interfering with them. If violence is threatened, the proper remedy is to restrain or Move against those threatening the violence"... March 10, U.S. Justice Department asked Federal District Court 965 in Montgomery to stop Governor George C, Wallace, Director of Public Safety Al Lingo and Sheriff Clark from interfering with demonstrations aimed at securing the vote. The Government accused the three officials of preventing and discouraging Negroes from exercising their full rights of citizenship." The Department asked for an order preventing the officials from summarily punishing, by striking, beating, tear-gassing or other means, any person seeking citizenship rights. March 8, NAACP Legal Defense lawyers moved, by asking federal 965 Judge Frank M. Johnson, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, to forbid state and local law enforcement officials from further interference with peaceful Negro attempts to march from Selma to Montgomery, Alabama. Also, the Legal Defense Fund sought a temporary restraining order against Governor George C. Wallace, State Public Safety Commissioner Al Lingo, and Dallas County Sheriff James Clark. Instead, Judge Johnson issued an injunction halting a planned march from Selma to Montgomery, February 26, Judge Thomas granted permission to file amended and 1965 supplemental compl aint adding Judge James Hare, Circuit Judge of Fourth Judicial Circuit, as a defendant. (more) Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 >a February 23, 1965 February 13, 1965 February 11, 1965 February 10, 1965 % “February 10, §1965 February 8, 1965 February 5, 1965 February 5, 1965 -2- Legal Defense Fund filed an amended and supplemental complaint seeking to add Judge Hare as a party defendant and to enjoin his ordering of arrests and prosecution of Negroes for peacefully assembling in vicinity of the Dallas County Courthouse, Civil rights attorneys also sought to enjoin his summary conviction of such persons for contempt of court. Legal Defense Fund supplemented a motion for Additional Relief and for Order to Show Cause, charginc that the District Court's order had been further violated by the arrests of February 1 through 8. Motion also detailed events of February 10 when Sheriff Clark led nearly 200 Negro children on a forced march. In addition, attorneys asked Judge Thomas to require the defendants to appear before him immediately and show cause why they should not be held in contempt of his orders. Acting on a motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund for the 26 Negroes arrested in Selma for "Contempt of Court," the District Court of Appeals in New Orleans handed down an order requiring the Federal District Court, in Mobile, Ala., to hear the Legal Defense Fund's argument for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the case cf the 26, In New Orleans, Legal Defense Fund attorney, Norman Amaker filed amotion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus with District Court of Appeals Judge John Minor Wisdom for the 26 Negroes arrested for contempt of Court in Selma, Ala. Also, attorney Amaker asked the District Court of Appeals to delay the execution of the 5-day sentence and $50 fine imposed by the Circuit Court on the 26 Negroes until the appeal proceedings had been decided. In Washington, D.C., NAACP Legal Defense Fund Director-Counsel, Jack Greenberg and Dr, Martin Luther King, Jr. met in a private session with President Lyndon Johnson to discuss the Selma situation. Later, Dr. King met with Vice-President Hubert Humphrey and U.S, Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach to discuss the need for additional federal legislation in order to guarantee all citizens the right to vote, Both meetings were confidential. Federal District Court Judge Daniel H, Thomas denied Legal Defense Fund motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the conviction of 26 Negroes for "Contempt of Court" in Selma. NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a motion for a Writ of Habeas Corpus on behalf of 26 Negroes who had been arrested for Contempt of Court when they paraded in the Courthouse area while Court was in session. They were convicted and given punish- ment of 5 days in jail and $50 fine. The motion was made before the Federal District Court. Dr. Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leader- ship Conference called a temporary halt to demonstrations to consider future action. (more) February 4, 1965 February 3, 1965 February 3, 1965 February 2, 1965 > 2 February 1, 1965 ae Judge Daniel H. Thomas, acting on a suit filed by the U.S. Department of Justice more than’a year ago, handed down an injunction streamlining procedures for processing Negro voter applications; barring the use of complicated literacy tests; and assuring Negroes of the right to apply directly to the court if rejected, Although this injunction covered generally the relief sought in the NAACP Legal Defense Fund suit (King v. Baker), it was not as all encompassing or as specific in detail. NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed a suit (King v. Baker) with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, which, in part, asked the Court to enjoin Wilson Baker, Director of Public Safety, from intefering with peaceful demonstrations; instruct Dallas County officials to hire a minimum of 10 additional registrars and require .they process at least 100 persons a day; require that Selma's voter- registration office stay open six days a week; and to enjoin the registrars from refusing to allow Negroes to take the old test by which registered whites qualified in the past. This entire motion was denied by Judge Daniel H, Thomas. However, the motion to enjoin Wilson Baker from interfering with Negro registration efforts, which was denied, was based on similar facts and of the same nature as the motion granted against Sheriff James Clark. Judge James A, Hare of the Circuit Court of Dallas County issued an order which, in the opinion of Legal Defense Fund attorneys, directly conflicted with the order issued by the U.S, District Court. It said in part: «.."That any person or persons assembling or attempting in, around or about the Dallas County Court House or grounds for the purpose of demon- strating or assembling for said purpose, be and are hereby ordered to separate and disassemble..." Demonstrators who did assemble at the Dallas County Court House were arrested and given as high as $50.00 fine and five days in jail. Sheriff James Clark arrested 26 Negroes conducting a peaceful demonstration outside the County Court- house for disturbing the Court while it was in session. They were convicted on a "Contempt of Court" charge and were required to serve 5 days in jail and $50 fines. ae we Director of Police, ‘lilson Baker arrested Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Rev. Ralph Abernathy and 267 other Negroes for "Parading Without a License." Dr. King stated that the purpose of the march was to urge the Board of Registrars to increase the number of days when Negroes in Selma can register to vote. Presently, (Feb, 1) the Registration Office is open only on the lst and 3rd Mondays of the month, Also, on the same day (Feb. 1) some 400 Negro youths were arrested near the Courthouse on charges of "Truancy" and "Juvenile Delinquency." They were holding a "peaceful" demonstration and singing : "freedom" songs. Arrested Negro youths were either released in their parents' custody; released after signing a statement that they would not participate sbn®future ‘demonstrations; “or, were made to appear before the Family, Court Judge. 2M < ¥ rs % oat i (more) January 30, 1965 i aks x eis Pes aes January 28, 1965 uary 23, 5 January 22, 1965 wishiouse in Selma, Ala. SA Judge Daniel H. Thomas issued an order "Amending the Temporary Restraining Order of January 23, 1965." In effect, it.stated only 100 persons would be “alYowed in the voter-registration line at the Court- However, as long as = demonstrations for the purpose of encouraging persons to register were peaceful, orderly ar not interfere with the proceedings at the Courth or traffic outside, such gatherings were permissible. After many more arrests, including that of John Lewis, SNCC Chairman, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed a "Motion for Additional Relief and Show Cause Order," in which they urged that Sheriff Clark proved himself not in contempt of the Court's order or be fined or imprisoned, or both. Also, that all inteference with Negroes seeking to register to vote be halted. Mrs. Annie Lee Cooper, a 53 year old clerk at a Selma motel, was wrestled to the ground by Sheriff James Gy Clark and three of his deputies. Dr. Martin Luther King a¢cused the-police of brutality. Mrs. Cooper contends she was defending herself against the Sheriff when she struck him. She was arrested and released ; under $2,000 bail on two charges of assault. Legal Defense Fund attorneys moved for and obtained a temporary restraining order after oral argument. Judge Thomas said, in part, that "those interested in encouraging others to register to vote have the right peaceably to assemble outside the Courthouse, but shall not do so in such a way as to intefere with lawful business expected to be transacted in the Courthouse. Such persons have the right to peaceably assembly without molestation, and will be permitted to do so.” The Court also added that Negroes “are entitled to have lawful protection in such assemblage." The NAACP Legal Defense Fund filed with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Alabama, a complaint and motion for temporary restraining order requesting injunctive relief again against Sheriff James G. Clark restraining him and the other cefendants. It asked that the defendants be enjoined from intefering with Negroes attempting to register to vote or those peacefully gathered for the purpose of vouching for them or to encourage them. more January 2). ° ie Dr. King addressed mass meeting and launched “ woter registration drive. ecember 31, © NAACP Legal Defense Fund attorneys filed a re- Tees July 14-15, 1964 July 9 1964 Earl ul oO March 6 1964 “9newed motion to dissolve injunction (see Tuly 9, . 1964, herewith) in light of plans for “anuary 2, ter registration drive launching. ion cannot be enforced in local state court, «so long as Federal Court has jurisdictions , Pa Federal uidge, Daniel Thomas ordered the release of all those arrested, reducing bail to comply wi federal standards. ON G % Dallas County Circuit Judge ‘ames Hare issued an injunction @€njoining SNCC, other civil rights organizations, and individuals doing civil rights work, as well as the Ku Klux Klan and other racist grouos (from meeting in public, in groups larger than three, or in private where violations of law are suggested or advocated.) The Legal Defense Fund is fighting to have the injunction dissolved and is currently urging the Federal District © Court, to which the,case has been removed, to tain jurisdiction. = 6 About 75 participants in a SNCC-sponsored ee a registration drive were arrested for various e charges, including disturbing the peace, trespass — after warning, interfering with a court in ‘session, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Some of these arrests grew out of a test of the Civil Rights Act at a local movie theater,! others from peaceful picketing. Pail was effectively denied by the continual shifting of bond conditions In the next week, the Legal Defense Fund secured : the removal of all of these cases to the Federal District Court. é The Alabama Court of Appeals reversed the peace bond convictions. Subsequently, the Appeals Court denied a rehearing. In Tune, 1964, the. state asked the Alabama Supreme Court to hear the case. In August, that court refused to do $0 and in WN vember declined to reconsider its refusal. September thru During these months, peaceful demonstrations, part October, 1963 of a voter registration campaign (in Dallas County, only 300 Negroes are registered), resulted in about 200 arrests. The Legal Defense Fund he- gan its defense of these persons. Fifteen were convicted in City Court of parading without a permit; these convictions were upheld by the county court. Among other convictions were three for contributing to the delinquency of a minore== sentences for these three were one. yeatat hard labor, a $300 fine, and a.%1)000 “peace bond -- and of. My un Law i hg ee bi -- sentences for ra signee wedays.in jail, {100"fines, and A) ee peace bonds. 2 i = Si. Editor's Note: Since October 1963, trials of the other persons arrested have continued in the Recorder's Court of Selma, The County Court of Dallas County, and appeals of all convictions taken to the Circuit Court of Dallas County. Those upheld in the Circuit Court have been further appealed to the Alabama Court of Appeals. The Legal Defense Fund efforts to secure the release of the persons being held on peace bonds, including ‘ohn Lewis, Chairman, and other members of SNCC, failed in the Dallas County Circuit Court. The "peace bond" con= victions required posting of a $1,000 bond and keeping the peace fees not engaging in further demonstrations). Legal Defense Fund attorneys: Norman Amaker, Charles “ones and Peter Hall may be reached: Day: 205-872-3759 205- 324-7691 Night: 205-323-7211