Exhibit E - Affidavit of Gerald Wilkerson
Public Court Documents
July 31, 1986
3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Exhibit E - Affidavit of Gerald Wilkerson, 1986. 9bd856d3-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0e4358af-6443-4c18-9e45-0c954beabd3a/exhibit-e-affidavit-of-gerald-wilkerson. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
Exhibit "E"
STATE OF ALABAMA **
AFFIDAVIT
CALHOUN COUNTY * *
Before me, the undersigned authority in and for the State
of Alabama, personally appeared GERALD WILKERSON who is known by me
and who is the Chairman of the Calhoun County Commission and who,
after being duly sworn according to law, deposed and stated as
follows:
My name is Gerald Wilkerson. I am a white citizen of
Calhoun County, Alabama. I am currently serving as Chairman of the
Calhoun County Commission.
Since the current Commission was created in 1939, there
have been two part-time Commissioners and a full-time Chairman.
All three members of the Commission have been elected county-wide.
By agreement of the parties, future elections will be by districts.
The parties have not agreed, however, on whether there will con-
tinue to be a full-time elected Chairman.
1 have served as Chairman for the past four years. I will
not be Chairman when my term expires next January. Thus, I feel
that I can describe the job without bias because the outcome will
not affect me personally.
The Commission meets as a body twice a month. At these
meetings, funds are appropriated and county policies are set.
Special meetings may be called as necessary, though this is fairly
infrequent. With this type of meeting schedule, it is impossible
for the Commission to collegially implement its policies, enforce
its budget decision or make timely judgments on whether a given
action meets the Commission's policy.
For example, Calhoun County recently constructed a new
jail. While the Commission itself made the decision to build the
facility, approved the plans, approved the contracts and
appropriated the funds, it could not, as a body, directly answer
the innumerable questions arising during construction. This
responsibility was delegated to me as Chairman. These daily
decisions ranged from approving or disapproving the purchase of
furniture to executing necessary change orders.
In addition to the daily problems arising during major
projects, there are countless questions concerning county admin-
istration that arise between Commission meetings. Just a partial
list of what the Chairman does on a daily basis would include
taking citizens' complaints about roads, drainage and water. He
meets constantly with other elected county officials about their
needs for space, personnel and equipment; and, then recommends to
the Commission a way to apportion the county's finite assets.
The Chairman is the one who usually serves as liason with
the legislative delegation on bills affecting county revenue or the
operation of county offices. He is the chief lobbyist for county
supported legislation.
The Chairman is on hand to meet with industrial prospects
and represents the county in making presentations to them. He
represents the county on metro-planning agencies in determining the
transportation needs of the county.
He does the nonclerical work on the county budget. He
presents it to the Commission for their consideration and makes any
adjustments required by the Commission. He then monitors the coun-
ty's revenues and expenditures on a constant basis. If the need to
borrow money arises and is authorized by the Commission, it is the
Chairman who negotiates the sale of county bonds or warrants.
In litigation, for or against the county, he is the county
representative. He is the county officer, for example, available
to testify at condemnation hearings.
The Chairman coordinates with the county engineer as to
the priorities of road and bridge work. This function is vital and
will be even more so under the district election plan. If county
road and bridge monies are simply divided and spent equally in the
districts the crucial work will not get done. An officer respon-
sible for the whole county is willing to allocate the bulk of
available funds in one district if that is where the need is
greatest. Officers answerable only in one district tend to want
their share of funds regardless of the needs of other districts.
Priority of equipment purchases are made in the same fashion.
The Chairman is available to meet with state and federal
highway officials on joint projects. He is liason with the two
large military complexes in the county, Ft. McClellan and Anniston
Army Depot. He is the liason with the county's municipalities in
joint projects.
Someone representing the Commission needs to be in the
courthouse on a daily basis simply to know what is going on and to
=3=
recommend action to the Commission. It is necessary that someone
from the Commission monitor the expenses of various county offices.
In Alabama, the County Commission has the responsibility for the
operation of county government, but in fact has only limited abi-
lity to control the operations of many of its offices. The Tax
Assessor, Tax Collector, Probate Judge, License Commissioner and
Sheriff are all separately elected constitutional officers. Their
expenses must be monitored on a constant basis. Too, their efforts
must be coordinated for the county to function. The Chairman ser-
ves as coordinator.
1 do not think the county can function with a part-time
County Commission unless there is a full-time Chairman, or some
executive officer regardless of his title. There are just too many
things to be done. I think that officer should be elected, not
appointed. The public perception is that professional managers try
only to please a majority of the commission or council; they feel
no particular need to please the general public.
As noted, many vital functions of county government are
the responsibility of separately elected officers. The Chairman,
with a county-wide election mandate of his own, has a difficult
enough time keeping their efforts coordinated. I doubt a civil
servant or manager could do it.
In sum, being the chief executive of the county is a full-
time job. Being a member of the County Commission is not, and does
not need to be, a full-time position. Policy and major decisions
can be made at regular or special meetings. They cannot, however,
be implemented at such meetings. The county government cannot be
administered at such meetings.
The position of Chairman has existed since at least 1939
when the present system was enacted. The need for a full-time exe-
cutive has only grown since then. It will continue when the new
election system is implemented.
fF SET
pH % A,
Gerald Wilkerson
Sworn to and subscribed before me
y of July, 1986.
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES CT, 4, 1983