Exhibit E - Affidavit of Gerald Wilkerson
Public Court Documents
July 31, 1986

3 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Dillard v. Crenshaw County Hardbacks. Exhibit E - Affidavit of Gerald Wilkerson, 1986. 9bd856d3-b7d8-ef11-a730-7c1e527e6da9. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0e4358af-6443-4c18-9e45-0c954beabd3a/exhibit-e-affidavit-of-gerald-wilkerson. Accessed April 08, 2025.
Exhibit "E" STATE OF ALABAMA ** AFFIDAVIT CALHOUN COUNTY * * Before me, the undersigned authority in and for the State of Alabama, personally appeared GERALD WILKERSON who is known by me and who is the Chairman of the Calhoun County Commission and who, after being duly sworn according to law, deposed and stated as follows: My name is Gerald Wilkerson. I am a white citizen of Calhoun County, Alabama. I am currently serving as Chairman of the Calhoun County Commission. Since the current Commission was created in 1939, there have been two part-time Commissioners and a full-time Chairman. All three members of the Commission have been elected county-wide. By agreement of the parties, future elections will be by districts. The parties have not agreed, however, on whether there will con- tinue to be a full-time elected Chairman. 1 have served as Chairman for the past four years. I will not be Chairman when my term expires next January. Thus, I feel that I can describe the job without bias because the outcome will not affect me personally. The Commission meets as a body twice a month. At these meetings, funds are appropriated and county policies are set. Special meetings may be called as necessary, though this is fairly infrequent. With this type of meeting schedule, it is impossible for the Commission to collegially implement its policies, enforce its budget decision or make timely judgments on whether a given action meets the Commission's policy. For example, Calhoun County recently constructed a new jail. While the Commission itself made the decision to build the facility, approved the plans, approved the contracts and appropriated the funds, it could not, as a body, directly answer the innumerable questions arising during construction. This responsibility was delegated to me as Chairman. These daily decisions ranged from approving or disapproving the purchase of furniture to executing necessary change orders. In addition to the daily problems arising during major projects, there are countless questions concerning county admin- istration that arise between Commission meetings. Just a partial list of what the Chairman does on a daily basis would include taking citizens' complaints about roads, drainage and water. He meets constantly with other elected county officials about their needs for space, personnel and equipment; and, then recommends to the Commission a way to apportion the county's finite assets. The Chairman is the one who usually serves as liason with the legislative delegation on bills affecting county revenue or the operation of county offices. He is the chief lobbyist for county supported legislation. The Chairman is on hand to meet with industrial prospects and represents the county in making presentations to them. He represents the county on metro-planning agencies in determining the transportation needs of the county. He does the nonclerical work on the county budget. He presents it to the Commission for their consideration and makes any adjustments required by the Commission. He then monitors the coun- ty's revenues and expenditures on a constant basis. If the need to borrow money arises and is authorized by the Commission, it is the Chairman who negotiates the sale of county bonds or warrants. In litigation, for or against the county, he is the county representative. He is the county officer, for example, available to testify at condemnation hearings. The Chairman coordinates with the county engineer as to the priorities of road and bridge work. This function is vital and will be even more so under the district election plan. If county road and bridge monies are simply divided and spent equally in the districts the crucial work will not get done. An officer respon- sible for the whole county is willing to allocate the bulk of available funds in one district if that is where the need is greatest. Officers answerable only in one district tend to want their share of funds regardless of the needs of other districts. Priority of equipment purchases are made in the same fashion. The Chairman is available to meet with state and federal highway officials on joint projects. He is liason with the two large military complexes in the county, Ft. McClellan and Anniston Army Depot. He is the liason with the county's municipalities in joint projects. Someone representing the Commission needs to be in the courthouse on a daily basis simply to know what is going on and to =3= recommend action to the Commission. It is necessary that someone from the Commission monitor the expenses of various county offices. In Alabama, the County Commission has the responsibility for the operation of county government, but in fact has only limited abi- lity to control the operations of many of its offices. The Tax Assessor, Tax Collector, Probate Judge, License Commissioner and Sheriff are all separately elected constitutional officers. Their expenses must be monitored on a constant basis. Too, their efforts must be coordinated for the county to function. The Chairman ser- ves as coordinator. 1 do not think the county can function with a part-time County Commission unless there is a full-time Chairman, or some executive officer regardless of his title. There are just too many things to be done. I think that officer should be elected, not appointed. The public perception is that professional managers try only to please a majority of the commission or council; they feel no particular need to please the general public. As noted, many vital functions of county government are the responsibility of separately elected officers. The Chairman, with a county-wide election mandate of his own, has a difficult enough time keeping their efforts coordinated. I doubt a civil servant or manager could do it. In sum, being the chief executive of the county is a full- time job. Being a member of the County Commission is not, and does not need to be, a full-time position. Policy and major decisions can be made at regular or special meetings. They cannot, however, be implemented at such meetings. The county government cannot be administered at such meetings. The position of Chairman has existed since at least 1939 when the present system was enacted. The need for a full-time exe- cutive has only grown since then. It will continue when the new election system is implemented. fF SET pH % A, Gerald Wilkerson Sworn to and subscribed before me y of July, 1986. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES CT, 4, 1983