Notice of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; Affidavit of David R. Jones; Affirmation of Rachel D. Godsil
Public Court Documents
August 22, 1996 - August 23, 1996
18 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Campaign to Save our Public Hospitals v. Giuliani Hardbacks. Notice of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; Affidavit of David R. Jones; Affirmation of Rachel D. Godsil, 1996. ef38f6ba-6835-f011-8c4e-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/0e8e055f-f462-4df9-bd0c-20fe699da42b/notice-of-cross-motion-for-summary-judgment-affidavit-of-david-r-jones-affirmation-of-rachel-d-godsil. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF QUEENS
CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC HOSPITALS -
QUEENS COALITION, an unincorporated
association, by its member WILLIAM
MALLOY, CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC
HOSPITALS - CONEY ISLAND HOSPITAL
COALITION, an unincorporated association,
by its member PHILIP R. METLING, ANNE
YELLIN, and MARILYN MOSSOP, : NOTICE OF CROSS-
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs, INDEX NO. 10763/96
- against -
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, THE MAYOR OF THE
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY HEALTH
AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, and NEW
YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE, that upon the annexed
affidavit of DAVID R. JONES, dated August 22, 1996, and RACHEL D.
GODSIL, ESQ., dated August 23, 1996, and upon all of the
pleadings and proceedings heretofore had herein, the undersigned
will move this Court at IAS Part 5, at the Courthouse located at
88-11 Sutrphin Boulevard, in the Borough of Queens, City and State
of New York, on the 20th day of September, 1996, at 9:30 A.M. , OY
as soon thereafter as counsel may be heard, for an order (i)
pursuant to CPLR § 3212, granting summary judgment in plaintiffs’
yf B) - » *
v a “ -*
favor and (ii) granting such other and further relief as this
Court may deem just and proper.
Dated: New York, New York
August 23, 1996
Kenneth Kimerling
Puerto Rican Legal Defense &
Education Fund, Inc.
+98 Hudson St ., 14th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-3360
Elaine R. Jones
Director-Counsel
Norman Chachkin
Marianne L. Engelman Lado
Rachel D. Godsil
NAACP Legal Defense &
Educational Fund, Inc.
99 Hudson St., 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
(212) 219-1900
Barbara Olshansky
Center For Constitutional
Rights
666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, New York 10012
(212) 664-6464
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TO: Paul A. Crotty
Corporation Counsel of the
City of New York
Attorney for Defendants
100 Church Street
New York, New York 10007
(212) 788-0412
By: Daniel Turbow
Assistant Corporation Counsel
Edward Sadowsky, Esq.
Tenzer Greenblatt LLP
Attorneys for City Council
The Chrysler Building
405 Lexington Avenue
New York, New York 10174
(212) 855-5000
é ’ - 4 o
“
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF QUEENS
CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC HOSPITALS -
QUEENS COALITION, an unincorporated
association, by its member WILLIAM
MALLOY, CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC
HOSPITALS - CONEY ISLAND HOSPITAL
COALITION, an unincorporated association, INDEX NO. 10763/96
by its member PHILIP R. METLING, ANNE
YELLIN, and MARILYN MOSSOP,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, THE MAYOR OF THE AFFIDAVIT OF
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY HEALTH DAVID R. JONES
AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, and NEW
YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF NEW YORK Pe
David R. Jones, being duly sworn, deposes and says:
1. I am President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Community Service Society and serve on the Board of the New
York City Health and Hospitals Corporation ("HHC"). Pursuant
to the HHC Act,’ HHC is administered by the board of
directors on which I serve. I have served on the HHC Board
since 1993. 1 submit this affidavit in support of
plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ motion for an order
granting summary judgment in their favor. The facts set
forth below are within my personal knowledge or are based
' Unconsolidated Laws § 7384 (McKinneys 1996) .
1
N = # “
-
upon information obtained from officials and employees of the
City, HHC, and the New York City Economic Development
Corporation ("EDC"), books and records of these entities, or
other public documents.
INTRODUCTION
2. In this suit, plaintiffs seek to ensure that the
defendants undertake the legally mandated public comment and
review as they proceed with the disposition of the Elmhurst
Hospital Center, Queens Hospital Center, and Coney Island
Hospital Center (the "target hospitals").
i The Uniform Land Use Review Procedure ("ULURP") is
a procedure mandated by the New York City Charter for
ensuring community, borough, and City Council participation
in the sale, lease or other disposition of city property.
New York City Charter § 197-c.
4. Defendants claim that ULURP is not applicable to
the disposition of the target hospitals because HHC, and not
the City, is subleasing the target hospitals. I submit this
affidavit to place into the record the facts to show that
defendants are wrong.
5. What is at issue in this case is the Mayor’s plan
to lease the target hospitals to a private entity. The Mayor
of the City of New York -- not HHC -- decided to privatize
the public hospitals. The Mayor chose ‘to: put the
privatization plan into the hands of the New York City
Economic Development Corporation. The Mayor decided that the
. » - o Fl
-
first three hospitals to be "sold" are the target hospitals.
The Board of HHC has never voted upon, reviewed or formally
discussed whether to privatize the public hospitals or
whether to dispose of the target hospitals specifically.
THE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
6. The New York State Constitution mandates the State
and its political subdivisions to provide aid, care, and
support for the needy and to provide for the protection of
the health of the inhabitants of the State and the City of
New York. New York State Constitution Article XVII, Section
3 54.
7. in order to fulfill this constitutional mandate to
provide health care for the poor, on May 26, 1969, the New
York State Legislature enacted the HHC Act, Unconsolidated
Laws §§ 7381 et seq., establishing the Health and Hospitals
Corporation.
8. HHC was created at the request of New York City to
provide comprehensive physical and mental health care to the
ill and infirm of the City, and was specifically charged with
ensuring the provision of "high quality, dignified" care to
"those who can least afford such services." U.L. § 7382.
9. In order to effect the purposes of the Act to
provide such care, HHC’s creation was intended to overcome
the "myriad of complex and often deleterious constraints"
which inhibited the provision of care by the City
government's operation of the municipal hospital system.
i J % § ‘
U.L. §:7382.
10. However, many of the powers granted to HHC were
constrained, and in some instances, subject to direct
oversight by the City. See U.L.: §8 7385(19); 7386{1){(a),
(2) (Db), (7); 7390(5)-(8). Among these were the power to
"dispose of by sale, lease or. sublease, real or personal
property including but not limited to a health facility, or
any ‘interest therein . . w. ..°" U.L. “8 “738546: This
authority was contingent upon approval by the then-existing
New York City Board of Estimate. U.L. § 7385(6).
11. On July 1, 1970, the City and HHC entered into an
agreement ("Operating Agreement") under which HHC agreed to
assume responsibility for maintaining and operating the
City’s public hospitals. Por ics part, the City agreed to
lease its hospital facilities to HHC for an annual rent of
$1, for a term coexistent with the life of HHC. A copy of
the Operating Agreement is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1.
12. Among the eleven hospitals operated by HHC, the
target hospitals are intended for immediate disposition by
the Mayor as part of his privatization plan.
13.% The public ® hospitals, including the target
hospitals, provide a disproportionate amount of care for
those who are indigent or uninsured. Private hospitals are
just that -- "private." Under state law, private hospitals
generally may turn away the uninsured and underinsured except
in cases of emergency. Public Health Law § 2805-b.
® . “ » ‘
14. Queens and Elmhurst Hospital Centers are the only
public acute care facilities in Queens. If they are
privatized, there will be no facility in Queens that is
required under state law to provide non-emergent care to the
indigent or uninsured. Similarly, Coney Island Hospital is
the largest facility in South Brooklyn, serving a population
of 750,000. The privatization of this targeted hospital may
result in the lack of care for many within its catchment area
unable to afford private care.
15. Queens Hospital Center has existing plans for
renovation and reconstruction. The "sale" of the hospital to
a private entity could affect the plans for and completion of
those much needed repairs and modernization.
THE MAYOR'S PRIVATIZATION PLAN
A. The Privatization Initiative
16. As set forth below, in 1994, Mayor decided to
privatize the public hospitals. The HHC Board was not
consulted as to this decision.
17. The Mayor has yet to forward evidence that
privatizing HHC facilities would save the City money. The
Mayor, not the HHC Board, requested from J.P. Morgan a
feazgibility study of privatization. Significantly, in ics
report to the City regarding the financial feasibility of
privatizing the target hospitals, J.P. Morgan specifically
did not consider the costs or benefits to the delivery of
services to the indigent. A copy of the Report to The City of New
6 Fa - f
York Concerning the Privatization of Coney Island Hospital, Elmhurst Hospital Center,
Queens Hospital Center [hereinafter J.P. Morgan Report] at 30,
annexed hereto as Exhibit 2 ("The financial benefits to the
City of New York, of course, also depend upon factors not
considered in this analysis, such as conditions of sale
relating to care of the indigent, provisions of services to
the City and the like.")
18. Nor did the Mayor provide evidence that the
provision of care will be superior if the HHC hospitals are
privatized. Indeed, the medical care at HHC hospitals is
already provided by private medical centers or medical
corporations; the Queens Hospital Center and Elmhurst
Hospital have affiliation contracts with Mount Sinai Medical
School and Coney Island Hospital has worked in partnership
with University Group Medical Associates. P.C. ("UGMA"), a
medical group that employs more than 300 physicians.
19. From the inception of his extensive privatization
program, the Mayor has exercised total control over the
entire process. While on some occasions, the Mayor’s office,
often through Maria Mitchell, Special Advisor to the Mayor
for Health Policy and Chairperson of the HHC Board, has
briefed the HHC Board about City policies and plans, the
Mayor has never consulted the Board. Indeed, the HHC Board
has never voted to proceed with privatization. This affiant
asserts that it is the exclusive fiduciary responsibility of
the HHC Board to determine the fate of the HHC facilities.
6
*
’
The Mayor’s actions to date do not respect this legislatively
mandated authority.
20. In 1994, it is my recollection that the Mayor's
advisors circulated proposals to transfer control of Lincoln,
North Central Bronx, Elmhurst, and Queens to their respective
voluntary affiliates and Coney. Island into an independent
voluntary hospital. The HHC Board was not presented with
these proposals.
21. The Mayor chose EDC to manage the privatization
initiative and, in summer of 1994, EDC engaged J.P. Morgan to
consider the sale of one or more of the HHC hospitals and to
issue a report. The HHC Board was neither consulted, nor
were public discussions held, nor a vote ever taken on these
actions.
B. Disposition of the Target Hospitals
22. In February of 1995, prior to the issuance of the
J.P. Morgan Report, the Mayor publicly announced that the
City would proceed with his plan to privatize the target
hospitals; again the Board was not consulted regarding this
decision and did not give its approval. In this connection,
and without consultation with or approval from the Board, the
Mayor created and alone appointed an "Advisory Panel" to
study the sale of the Target Hospitals. Maria Mitchell, the
Special Advisor to the Mayor for Health Policy and HHC Chair,
Lo serve as Executive Director of the Mayoral Advisory Panel.
I question how an Advisory Panel could supplant the vote of
4 1 #
»
the HHC Board. Moreover, despite my protestations at HHC
Board meetings to have the Advisory Panel make a presentation
to the HHC Board, no such presentations have taken place.
23. The J.P. Morgan Report was issued in March of 1995.
While the Report concluded that the target hospitals have
desirable assets which will attract buyers, it did not
consider the cost of providing care to the indigent. J.P.
Morgan Report at 30, annexed hereto as Exhibit 2.
24. Once again, the HHC Board was not given an
opportunity to review or authorize the J.P. Morgan Report or
any recommendations in it prior to its dissemination. The
HHC Board only received a copy of the report after it was
made public.
25. Shortly after the issuance of the J.P. Morgan
Report, in April of 1995, six members of the HHC Board,
including myself, sent a letter to the Mayor protesting the
inadequacy of the J.P. Morgan report as well as the entire
privatization process. In the letter we also stated:
We are further disappointed that the Board of Directors
of HHC, as the designated governing body under state
law, was not sought in this decision making. As members
of the Board of Directors, we would be breaching our
fiduciary duty to the institution, as well as our
responsibility to the public, by allowing this decision
process to move forward without asking that our concerns
about this report be addressed and that the Board be
informed, full participants in this process.
26. At the HHC Board Meeting I attended held April 27,
1995, Ms. Mitchell announced that "The J.P. Morgan report was
a logical first step in a multi-tiered process which the City
6 - . 8 ‘ >
required in order to determine whether privatization was in
its financial interest, and if it was, then to determine how
to proceed. The report analyzes the financial implications
of the City’s ownership of Coney Island, Elmhurst, and Queens
Hospitals, the anticipated interest by other organizations in
taking over these facilities, and the financial ramifications
of transferring those assets. From a strictly financial
perspective, the ‘report. finds that privatization is
overwhelmingly in the City’s interest." A copy of the April
27 Meeting Minutes is annexed hereto as Exhibit 3.
27. At the July 27, 1995 meeting, Ms. Mitchell reported
that " [tlhe City’s Economic Development Corporation last
Friday announced the selection of J.P. Morgan as the
financial advisor for the sale of Coney Island, Elmhurst and
Queens Hospitals. . . . The EDC Board approved J.P. Morgan
and selected them over a group of four other firms that had
responded to the Request for Proposals. The firms were
identified from a pool of thirty-six Firms that responded to
EDC regarding the City’s privatization and financing
initiatives." A copy of the July 27, 1995 Meeting Minutes is
annexed hereto as Exhibit 4.
28. At this meeting, Ms. Mitchell also notified us of
the schedule of the sale/lease process for the target
hospitals. She stated that the City would receive
indications of interest from potential purchasers and select
finalists by January 1996, complete due diligence and receive
& « # PF
>
binding offers by March 1996, and complete negotiations and
finalize the sale by June 1996. Id. at 12.
29. Responding to the objection of a Board Member that
the Board had never discussed the issue of whether to sell
any HHC facilities or the criteria to be employed in deciding
which facilities, if any, to sell, Ms. Mitchell stated that
the Administration had already made the decision to proceed
with the sale, and had already selected the three facilities
to be sold as well. Id. at ‘16-21. Ar no point in this
meeting, did Ms. Mitchell request approval by the HHC Board
of this Mayoral decision.
30. When Board members raised objections to the fact
that the Board had never had an opportunity to decide whether
to dispose of the target hospitals, Ms. Mitchell stated that
the "intent of the Administration to go forward with the sale of those three facilities
has been clear for sometime and has been discussed previously
before the Board." (emphasis added) Id. at 28.
31... On August 1, 1995, EDC on behalf of the City
entered into a Supplemental Agreement with J.P. Morgan to act
as the financial advisor "with respect to the sale, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition of, in one or a series of
transactions (which may include or take the form of the
execution of management contracts or leases in respect
of) (each, a "Transaction" and, collectively, the
"Transactions"), Coney Island Hospital, Elmhurst Hospital
Center and Queens Hospital Center (each, a "Hospital" and,
10
collectively, the "Hospitals"). The Supplemental Agreement
provides no role for the HHC Board, reserving, instead, for
EDC the right to accept or reject, in its sole discretion,
any proposed transaction. A copy of the Supplemental
Agreement 1s annexed hereto as Exhibit 5.
C Offering Memoranda and Letter of Intent
32..0n October: 26, 1995, EDC issued two Offering
Memoranda prepared by J.P. Morgan for the privatization of
the target hospitals. According to the Memoranda, the
privatization will be accomplished through long-term leases
of the facilities to the health care providers. Neither the
Offering Memoranda, nor any of the terms incorporated in them
were submitted to the HHC Board for its advice, comment or
approval.
33.. They were distributed to a confidential list of
potential purchasers to allow them to submit bids on the
hospitals. As an HHC Board member, I never received nor
approved the bidders list.
34. BDC hag retained counsel: to handle the legal
aspects of the disposition of the target hospitals. The HHC
Board was never consulted, neither did we approve this
decision.
35. On June 26, 1996,:a letter of intent setting forth
the framework for the sublease of Coney Island Hospital to
Primary Health Systems, Inc. and PHS New York, Inc. was
signed by Peter Powers, First Deputy Mayor of the City of New
11
6 od » »
)
York, Luls Marcos, for HHC, and Steven Volla for both PHS New
York and Primary Health Systems, Inc. ("Letter of Intent").
A copy of the letter of intent is annexed hereto as Exhibit
6
36. The HHC Board has not been consulted, neither have
we approved or delegated the .authority to Mr. Marcos to
approve the Letter of Intent with PHS New York.
37. The fact that a Letter of Intent was signed with
PHS-New York, a for-profit entity, represents a significant
departure from the current method of providing medical care
in New York City. A for-profit entity has never operated a
hospital in New York City. The HHC Board was not consulted,
neither were public discussions held or a vote taken to allow
a for-profit entity to operate a hospital in New York City.
12
AUG 22 ’S6 ‘@ NAACP LEGAL DEF FUND 212 226 7592 TO 92682849 P.83/83
-
CONCLUSION
38. In sum, the Board of HHC has never been consulted, nor
had public discussions about, nor voted upon the issue of the
privatization of the hospitals in general, the disposition of the
target hospitals, or any steps in between. Therefore, it is
evident that it is the Mayor, and not HHC, who is undertaking the
disposition of the target hospitals.
Dated: New York, New York
August 22, 1996
TLE
TTR ose T—
Sworn to before me this
22nd day of August, 1996.
Na ic Se
NOTARY HUBLIC
JONATHAN FELDMAN
Notary Public, State of New York
No. 02FE5035948
Qualified in New York Count
Commission Expires __L| L [dt] Me
13
xk TOTAL PAGE.BG3 ok
» . 1 ~ - » -
“ » .
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF QUEENS
CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC HOSPITALS -
QUEENS COALITION, an unincorporated
association, by its member WILLIAM
MALLOY, CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC
HOSPITALS - CONEY ISLAND HOSPITAL
COALITION, an unincorporated association, INDEX NO. 10763/96
by its member PHILIP R. METLING, ANNE
YELLIN, and MARILYN MOSSOP,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
AFFIRMATION OF
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, THE MAYOR OF THE RACHEL D. GODSIL
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY HEALTH
AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, and NEW
YORK CITY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF NEW YORK i
Rachel D. Godsil, Esq. hereby affirms that the following is
true under the penalty of perjury:
1. 1 am an attorney duly authorized to practice in the State
of New York. I am Assistant Counsel to the NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc. 1 make this affirmation din support of
plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and in opposition to
defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The facts set forth below
are within my personal knowledge or are based upon information
obtained from books and records of New York City, the New York City
Health and Hospitals Corporation ("HHC"), and the New York City
Economic Development Corporation ("EDC"), or other public documents.
1
boi » % ) . A -
25 In April of 1994, EDC issued on behalf of New York City
a Request for Qualifications ("RFQ") from Firms qualified to
perform financial advisory services in connection with "the
privatization of certain City-owned assets" including "hospitals
and related medical facilities." A copy of the Request for
Qualifications is annexed hereto as Exhibit 1. Upon information
and belief, the HHC Board was not consulted nor did it approve the
issuance of an RFQ relating to the privatization of HHC facilities.
3. In May of 1994, EDC issued on behalf of New York City a
Request for Proposals from Firms ("RFP") qualified to assist and
advice EDC with respect to the privatization of "certain City-owned
assets" including "hospitals and related medical facilities." A
copy of the Request for Proposals is annexed hereto as Exhibit 2.
Upon information and belief, the HHC Board was not consulted nor
did it approve the issuance of an RFP relating to the privatization
of HHC facilities.
4. In August of 1994, EDC retained J.P. Morgan to "provide
General Services to the Corporation generally in respect of the
City’s asset disposition initiative." Financial Advisory Agreement
between New York City Economic Development Corporation and J.P.
Morgan Securities, Inc. at 21. A copy of the Financial Advisory
Agreement is annexed hereto as Exhibit 3.
Dated: . New York, New York
August 23, 1996
RACHEL D. GODSIL, ESQ.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF QUEENS
CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC HOSPITALS -
QUEENS COALITION, an unincorporated
association, by its member WILLIAM
MALLOY, CAMPAIGN TO SAVE OUR PUBLIC
HOSPITALS - CONEY ISLAND HOSPITAL
COALITION, an unincorporated association,
by its member PHILIP R. METLING, ANNE
YELLIN, and MARILYN MOSSOP,
Plaintiffs,
- against -
RUDOLPH W. GIULIANI, THE MAYOR OF THE
City OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK City HEALTH
AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION, and NEW
YORK City ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION,
Defendants.
INDEX NO. 10763/96
NOTICE OF MOTION;
AFFIDAVIT OF DAVID R. JONES;
AFFIRMATION OF RACHEL D.
GODSIL
KENNETH KIMERLING
PUERTO RICAN LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATION FUND,
99 Hudson St., 14th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10013
212-219-3360
ELAINE R. JONES
Director-Counsel
NORMAN CHACHKIN
MARIANNE L. ENGELMAN LADO
RACHEL D. GODSIL
NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
99 Hudson St., 16th Floor
New York, New York 10013
212-219-1900
BARBARA OLSHANSKY
CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
666 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, N.Y. 10012
212-664-6464
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS
INC.
4