WIlliams v. Illinois Appendix

Public Court Documents
February 6, 1970

WIlliams v. Illinois Appendix preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Appendix Volume I, 1978. 7eb86f54-cdcd-ef11-b8e8-7c1e520b5bae. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9111b8c7-76d1-474f-bd66-1775152a06d2/appendix-volume-i. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    APPENDIX 

VOLUME I — Pages 1 - 305 

IN THE 

Supreme Court of the United States 
OCTOBER TERM, 1978 

No. 77-1844 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, et al, 

Appellants, 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, ef al, 

Appellees. 

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES 

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT 

  

JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT FILED JUNE 27, 1978 
PROBABLE JURISDICTION NOTED OCTOBER 2, 1978 

 



  

 
 

  

 
 

 
 

 
 

 



  

  
  

  

(i) 

INDEX 

Volume I 

Page 

Docket Entries 

BIDE a BLT RS INR Se de 

Court of Appeals... .. ic iui iivas oil oe 10 

BE SEER Sr Ee SE a ae RL Ra Ld 17 

Defendants’ Motion to DIStiss. .....c. ives dd iuiida 22 

Defendants’ Motion to Strike... oui vr uid viia ing, 24 

Order on Motion to Dismiss, dated November 18. 1975 25 

71h ra aR a CS RR Le 29 

Order on Class Action, filed January 19, 1976 ...........35 

Order of District Court, filed October 3, 1978, staying 

Ble CHONS mii sa A TS Sea se a 27 

Order of U.S. Supreme Court, entered October 16, 
1978, denying motion to vacate stay of elec- 

Transcript of Proceedings of Tuy 12-21, 1976, before 
District Court 

Testimony of Dr. Melton Mclaurin.................. 40 

Testimony of Dr. Cort B, Schlichting. ....... vouiv is 54 

Testimonyof Wiley L.- Bolden. ......... ooo. oii. 70 

Testimony of James E. Buskey............ yal, 92 

Testimony of Joseph Langan ........c.c.iviviviai aa 102 

Testimony of LonlaM. Gill ...............00 000i 125 

Testimony of Jerre Koffler .... ci. viii iii evia 131 

Testimony of RL. Hope............0 00 00 iii 139 

Testimony of James Seals.......... ccc hu caas, 145 

 



    

  

  

(ii) 

Testimony of James E. Voyles ...... Pe ET ..153 4 Nos 

Testimony of Charles Cotrell .................. sarenea 170 §. Wa 

Testimony of Sylvester Williams .............ccoevnnn.. 187 1 No. 6. 

Testimony of Leonard Wyatt. ..... RE DLT 196 : Wa 

Testimony of Sherman Smith ......... PPTL ERE ..204 i No. 7 - 

Testimony of Dan Alexander ....... EER Do Me | P No. 9 - 

Testimony of John Randolph. ........ SA SURE 211 | L of 1 

Testimony of Austin Pettaway ........ ay iit 3230 i No. 53 

Testimony of Mable P. Dotch........ FIOM bt a i No. 61 

Testimony of Janice McCamts ....... YOY ey Shes 234 : No. 6: 

Testimony of Clara Ester........... WOE Jet ian d80 : ~ Bu 

Testimony of Bill Roberts ....... SEDER WA ‘ No. 64 

Testimony of Robert B. Doyle .............. Swi inid ni 202 : gic 

Volume II : 2 No. 73 

: 5. No.75 
Testimony of Lambert Mims. ..... RE ER FLFR |) i No. 1. 

Testimony of Gary Greenough.........................396 2 Ut 

Testimony of Lambert Mims (Resumed)............. via 801 é 

Testimony of Gary Greenough (Resumed)............ S485 ' 

Testimony of James E. Voyles (Resumed) ........... 34500 

Testimony of George Winstanley. ..... Ce dean ps oh TELL 518 

Testimony of Earl Joyner.......... eavassre tare eney es 524 The 

Testimony of Tom Peavy.......... CS iia isa vns canes 12340 statute 

Testimony of Jack Summerall ....... CTD RR RE. | appear 

Testimony of Marion Barnett ..... i J v2 i+546 Storer 

Testimony of John A. Calametti...... ECR SOI 

Court Colloquy. ii icine sie see names sua ee +308 '& Opinic 

   



    

  
  

Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 

No. 5 — 1973 Mobile Voter Registration for Selected 

LTT) | OE SSE a SL BOR Cae SR AR 572 

No. 6 — 1976 Mobile Voter Registration for Selected 

Wards . o.oo i ae ava ne ve rey ve sie ard 573 

No. 7 — Summary Mobile County Voter Registration... .. 574 

No. 9 — Excerpts from Voyles Thesis: “An Analysis 

of Mobile Voting Patterns, 1948-70" ................ 575 

No. 53 — Summary of Statistical Analyses.............. 591 

No. 61 — Excerpts from File “Newspaper Ads” ....... 5.593 

No. 62 — Newspaper article “Numerous Cross 

Burnings’ cies ii sia nd re ries sre 600 

No. 64 — Summary of City Committees ................ 601 

No. 65 — File of Grand Jury Report and Newspaper 

clippings from 1976 re: Police Brutality .............. 605 

No. 73 — Summaries of City Employment Data (1975). ..611 

No. 75 — Summary — City Streets .................... 614 

No. 111 — Sub exhibit N to Documents regarding 

Utilization of Revenue Sharing Funds. ............... 615 

NOTE 

The following opinions, decisions, judgments, orders, and 

statutes have been omitted in printing the Appendix because they 

appear as follows in the Appendix to the printed Jurisdictional 

Statement: 

Appendix 

Opinion of the Court of Appeals, entered March 29, 

Lyi SERRE HE Ee IR LR Sa pad A



  

(iv) 

Opinion of the District Court, entered October 21, 

1976, as amended October 28, 1076 in) iaaivinene 

Judgment of the District Court..........cooverrereneee. 

Order of the District Court, establishing mayor- 

council government, entered March 9, 1077 ..viiiaee PD 

Order of the District Court, setting November 21, 

1978 as conditional date for elections, entered May 

31, 1078... ai vreau leit ed ae ae E 

Alabama Act No. 281 (Acts 1911, p. 330), as 

amended, Code of Alabama 1975 § §11-44-70 

through 11-44-105 (1977)............ BGs erate .'F 

Alabama Act No. 823 (Acts 1965, p. 1539) ........... Ww G 

Notice of Appeal....... 0 AT eR i IRR Ps ATU ik -H 

5# 

? 
§ 
5 EB 
3 ¥% 
3     

er free NA. 

t 528/21 | 75 
r~- 

OC 

  

    
  

lseT FOR | 

  

Jack 
an 

Suit 
' New 

Proposed int 
SECRETARY, 

) Henry Rembe 
710 Chin St 
Mobile, Al. 
  

CHLCK 
"MHE 

IF CARE WAS 740 
pete 

- 

filo N 

FrRATA 
PAUFES!S 

WIPD STATES DIST      



    

  

  

  

            

  

i ; . DOCKET =~ U.S. DISTRICT COURT 

: - Lr rice Pg OER Dogg oi 10 4 NZ 10 nm hy © REMAN Gren sho i TTS 

-_ B Re. = fi fs 5 | a gai : : a 

K3 1 ! C £ | 528/1 75% 297 6 109,75 3] 4m fa X 2804 : = 39 2-7) 

. 7. Tr PLAINTIFFS DETENDANTS JT, ,05e 
SET FOR TRIAL POI * lser FOR PRE TRIAL anki 

x b ON: __. 
D 1] owmd-Y22 

hy BOLDEN, WILEY L. CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAVA; 
4 HOPE, REV. R. L. GREENOUGH, GARY A. 
2 _ JOHNSSHy—~BHARERG Oman En 1114-7 DOYLE, ROBERT B., JR. 

; “LEFLORE, JANET O, MIMS, LAMBERT C., ind. 
5 LEFLORE, JOHN L. and in their official 

iE i, 5 MAXWELL, CHARLES capacities as Mobile 
a; # PURIFOY, OSSIE B. City Commissioners. 

i v SCOTT, RAYMOND ; ; 
2% SMITH, SHERMAN 
/ TAYLOR, CLLIE LEE 

) PHRNER —~RODNEY-0. MBMSEED 1-14-76 

F . WILLIAMS, ED 
.“ i. WILLIAMS, SYLVESTER 

WILSON, MRS. F. C. 

- G 
CAUSE 

i k2 ysc §§ 1973, 1983 & 1985(3). Acting seeking ,5ingle-member Qietrints 
-. H | for Mobile City Commission, attacking present "at-large" electi 

system, and for declaratory judgment and injunction against the oy 
holding any further elections under the present at-large election system. 
  

ATTORNEYS 

    

  

  
  

            
GREGORY B, STEIN : : i A A IB hM ‘ 
J. U. BLACKSHER C. B. ARENDALL, JR. 
1407 Davis Avenue : Post Office Box 123 
fobile, Alabama 36603 Mobile, Alabama 36601 

EDWARD STILT, S. R. SHEPPARD 
«321 Frank Nelson Bnilding ran City of Mobile Fags Dept. 
i ARC Post Office Box 1 ' 

Suite 601, Title Building Fonilos Aintoms * 0801 
2030 3rd Avenue, North s ZAROCOSTAS, JOE SIRvON 

A Birmingham, Alabama 35203 TEEN ot ¥ MIKE JACORS 
3 - 
ei ies Lionel L. Layden Fy A. Hologg, sa 
¥ ) Ras : 919 Deuphin St., Mobile, ats oka 
Yi DEPOSITIONS: 36 

DR. JAMES EVERETT Sorpes, 
: 02-03-76. 

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nebrit,III 
and Charles E. Williams, IIL TR. ELTON ALONZA NOLAURIY, 

Suite 2030, 10 Columbus Circle filed June 16, 1975. 76 
‘ New Yerk, New York 10019 DR. CORT B. SCHLICHTING, 7-8-7 

ROBERT S. EDINGTON, 7-8-76 
Proposed intervenor HENRY REMBERT, EXECUTIVE GARY COOPER, 7-9-76 
SECRETARY, GULF COAST PARENT ACTION LEAGUE: CAIN J. KENNEDY, 7-9-76 

) Henry Rembert, pro se DR. CHARLES L. COTRELL, 7-12-76 
710 Chin St. DR. CHARLES L. COTRELL, (Ccntinui 
Mobile, Al. 36610 ation) 9-15-76. ps 

cmeex FILING FEES PAID ETAVSTILILCAMLS 
] “MRE = oat a) —-— TT TLCEIPT NUTIRER C.0_NUMET i SS es BATE at] 

Canes 15-10-75 | # L6UT1 - Crawford, Blacksher & Kennedy | sss — 
FrRAA ELIE Tas a A ane 
VAUFE=!S : 

CNTTPDSTATES DISTRICT COUNT DOCKET esi LET 
            
 



    

  

8 

  

G- 
6 
5-17-75 

6~- 

Ba 

9- 

10-28-5 

10-29-5 

‘111-3-75 

11-7-75 

11- 
11-13-76 

11 

DAYER 

«amar he 

9-75 
10-75 

26-75 

26-75 

7-15-75 
7-22-75 

aQ. -19- -79 1s 

8. 

-28-75 

‘| 8-29-75 

25-75 

26-75 

10-5 

14-75 

Ie 
12 
1h 

26 
17 

18 

N 

2h 

2% 

28 
29 

PROCEEDINGS 

Complaint filed, mpc : : “ 
Summons issued with complaint for zervice on defendants, mpc 

Sumreons returned, executed as to LAMBERT C. NIMS as.Comm,, lps 
Summons returned, exscuted as to LAMBERT C. MINS, Ind., lps 
Summons returned, executed as to ROBERT B, DOYLE, as Comn., lps 
Summons returned, executed as to ROBERT R, DOYLE, ¥nd., lps 

‘{Surrrons returned, executed as to GARY A. an SIDUGH, 23 Crmn., 103 

Summons returned, executed as to GARY A. CREENOUGH, Ind., lps’ 
Motion for extension of time within which to Yagpons, to complaint 

filed by defendants; referrsd to Judge Hand, 1 
ORDER entered getting discovery cutoff date Sor’ Rrrrein ER 26, 1973 

with pretrial briefs due by OCTOBER 10, 1975; copies mailed to 
attorneys Blacksher, Still, Arendall and Sheppard, lps 

Motion for extension of time within which to respond to complaint 
filed by defendants on June 26, 1975 is GRANTED; notice mailed to 
attorneys, lpa 

Interrogatories to defendants filed by plaintiffs, om 

lotion to dismiss, with memorandum attached, filed by getendants, wet, 
[fotion to strike, with memorandum attached, "#11ea by defendants, wet, 

| Answers and otJectlons of defendants Lo plaintires’ "Discovery Notice 
Interrogatories;” .filed Ajr ° 

Defendants! Interrogatories to each plaintiff filed, Ajr 
Supplemental memorendum in support of motion to dismiss filed by 

defendants, o'b 
Motion to dismiss, filed by defendants July.22, 1975 a 
Motion to strike, filed ty defendants July 22, 1975 re ited after 

argusents AJr 
Status Report. AMENDMENT TO STANDARD PRE TRIAL ORDER entered and 

DISCOVERY extended to and including Nov, 10, 1975, and naming of 
witnesses on or before Nov, 25, 1975. Copy of this Amendment 
mailed to the Attorneys of Record on 30 Sep. 1975. (W.J.0.) 

Second interrogatories to defenddnts filed by plaintiffs, lps 
Motion to compel plaintiffs to answer interrogatories tifea by defen- 

dants; referred to Magistrate on October 30, 1975, lps 
Answers and objections to defendants’ interrogatories filed by plain- 

tiff ROBERT L. HOPE, lps 
Answers and objections to defendants’ intsrrogatoriea filed by plain- 

tir? WILEY L. BOLDEM, lps 
Answers and objections to defendants’ interrogatories filed by plains 

tiff SHERMAN SMITH, lps 
Interrogatories to the plaintiffs filed by defendants, jb 
Motion to compel answers of plaintiffs BOLDEN, HOPE and SMITH filed by 

defendants, Referred to Magistrate on 11-4-75, Jv (Fotices nailed 
to attorneys), 

ORDER entered, by Magistrate, that plaintiff are to answer interro- 
E856) of defendants within 10 days from this date (Min. Entry No. 
3 6),1ps : 

Copies of Min. Entry No. 39206 mailed to attomeys, lps 
Motion to extend dimcovery time an additional 30 days, filed by the 

plaintiffs AE 
Discovery extended to and including DECEMEER 10, 1975, notices mailed 

to attorneys Ajr 

Second request for production of documents flled by plaintiffs, h 
Motion to reconsider order on motion to compel answers to interrogator 

filed by plaintiffs, Referred to Magistrate on 11-17-75,     (SEE NEXT PAGE) 

AITO LATTE eT dea HADAAL SUOURRE 20 EST A Thy SE TIA S E IARd Er ———— 
J 

PF g
a
n
a
 

      

<i
 
R
D
 

iy
 

Ps 

  

  

VIL DOCKET 

TP AINTIFF 

  

CONTIN 

BOLDEN, WIL 

  

DATE 
  

    

) 12-4-75 

11-18-7 

11-18-5 

11-18-7 

11-21-79 

aii 

11-28-17 

11-29-7¢ 

12-3-75   

f1-17-7p 30 

31 

3 

6 33 

34 

b 35 

 



VIL DOCRET CONTINUATION SHEET 
  

. 

£2 
uh 
Po
s 

S
o
s
 
ow

 

        

  

~ > PC AINTIFF OLFENDANT 
. : : 4 pocxeT no, 15-207 -P 

. a \ ay BOLDEN, WILEY L., ET AL CITY OF MOBILE, ET AL A Te v.cis 

DATE NR. PROCEEDINGS 

( 7 hi-17-76 30 | Answers and objections of plaintiff SYLVESTER WILLIAMS, to defendants’ 
interrogatories, filed, wet, 

31 | Answers and objections of plaintiff CHARLES MAXWELL to defendants’ 
interrogatories, filed, wet, ' 4 

32 | Answers and objections of plaintiff EDWARD WILLIAMS to defendants’ 
interrogatories, filed, wet, : 

J 11-18-75 33 | Memorandum in support of motion to compel answers, filed by 

5 : defendants, wet, 2 
11-18-5! 34 | Motion to reconsider order on motion to compel answers to interro- 

gatories filed by plaintiffs on November 14, 1975 is GRANTED by 
Magistrate; plaintiff given to December 4, 1975 to answer defen~ 

to ( : dant's interrogatories; notice mailed to attomeys, lps 

11-18-75 35 | ORDER entered on defendants' motion to dismiss that insofar as the 
| ; action is based on 42 USC 1985(3), complaint fails to state a 

  
wet : : cause of action & the motion to dismiss this cause as to all 
ot; : defendants is GRANTED. Defendants' motion to dismiss the cause 
sie e of action under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, U2 USC 1973 is 

DENIED as to all defendants. Therefore, under 28 USC 130347, 
this court has jurisdiction of all defendants including the City 
of Mobile as to this cause of action; Since court has jurisdiction 
under 1343(4), it is unnecessary to discuss jurisdictional issue 

” under 25 USC 1331, Motion of defendants as to the cause of action 
+ Gh under 1973 & the attack of the jurisdiction as to 1343(%4) is not 

rn, : well taken & is DENIED, Defendants' motion to strike attorneys! 
RY fees & the injunctive relief prayed for in paragraph V-2 is 

r i'%5 . DENIED; M/E No. 3.7L Attorneys Blacksher & Bagwell advised of 
i ruling by phone on -20-75; and on 11-20-75; copy of order 

mailed attorneys Blacksher, Still, Bagwell and Sheppard, wet, 
: 11-21-79 36 |Motion to allow further discovery of facts and opinions held by 

Pen- Ets expert, Dr. James E. Voyles, filed by plaintiffs. mpc 
Fo d 37 [Notice of taking of deposition of DR. JAMES E. VOYLES filed by 

plaintiffs, moe 

    

in gtd 38 | Answers to Pla intiffs' second Interrogatories to Deferintas filed, 

- v (ae) : * WA 
in x 11-28-75 §tatus Report, ANSWER to be filed by next Friday. Set for Rre 
n= | ge, Trial in first week of Feb. 1976 (W.J.0.) 

rr N1-28-7% 39 | ORDER on plaintiffs’ motion to allow further discovery of expert, 
; DR, JAMES E, VOYLES that discovery mfrequested dy plaintiffs to 

d by a Dr. Voyles' dissertation is GRANTED provided the plaintiffs pay 
Led % expenses pursuant to FRCP, Rule 26 BY (8) (C) Motion as to further 

i : discovery is DENIED; M/E No. 39,470; copy mailed attorneys on 
hw 12-2-75, wet, : - : tin : 

Ro. 12-3-75| LO | ANSWER filed by defendants, wet: - or A 
: Jfr2-4-75 L1 | Answers and objections of plaintiff, RAYMOND SCOTT, to defendants’ 

PS interrogatories, filed, wet, . 
42 | Answers and objections of plaintiff JOHN L. LeFLORE, to defendants’ 

ded RN interrogatories, filed, wet, 
43 | Answers and objections of plaintiff, OSSIE BENJAMIN PURIFOY, to 

f defendants' interrogatories, filed, wet, 3 
ator] 44 | Answers end objections of plaintiff, JANET LeFLORE, to defendants’ 

interrogatories, jb 

DC-111A (Rev. 1/78)           
  

  
 



  

  

    

CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHERT 

  t ORFENDANT 

  

      

  

  

PLAINTIEP 

DOCKET NO. 
. be J 

PACE — OF ___ PAGES 

DATE NR, 
. PROCEEDINGS 

hr Ih A BLA I00 f-0h inet iene pl -nloinddfs  TTYTA ~ a — br'®L sve rs-end-eodiretions—of-plaintiisy FaA—Cr—BROWNy—to—-defendantel— 

LE. Ansuaras.and objections ofl plaintists, JEFF RANK. XIMBIE $a 
Ld 

  

  

12-11-76 

12-12-7h 

12-15-76 

12-15-74 

12-17-7% 

1--8-76| 5 

1--8-76| 5 

1--8-76] 5 

1--8-76| 5     

45 | Answers and objections of platntiee, FRANCIS GARY WILSON, to 
es 

12-31-79 53 [Motion to extend time in which to answer certain Jnierrogttories 

1-7-76| 54% [Motion to extend time for plaintiffs to answer interrogatories 

55 nswer to plaintiffs' third discovery notice filed by defendants, jb 

i I eferred to Judge Pittman 
01-13-76 60 rrefSisire pretrial order fo 

1-14-76|g0-A| Mo tion to dismiss plaintiffs RODNEY O. TURNER & CHARLES JOHNSON 
b 1-19-76] 61 |Order entered that plaint{rfs gay maintain this action of a class 

816; copies 1-20-74 62 Motion to compel compliance filed by defendants, Referred to 

dolondantal intorvoxatorios. Piled. wot : : 1 
a 

hd | aud   defendants' interrogator 
Answers to daf 

filed, 3b 
second interrogatories filed by plaintiffs 

us endants' b 12-8-75 47 Plaintiffs’ third fscove notice (interrogatories and requast far? production of documents) filed, grs. ..- hie a 48 Answers and objsctions to plaintiffs' second request for production of documents filed by defendants, jb- . . dA ; a ; a : iy i 12-38-75] 49 Answers and objections of plaintiff, OLLIE LEE TAYLOR, to defendants' interrogatories, filed, wet, 
50 DRDER entered on defendants' motion compelling plaintiffs, WILEY L. BOLDEN, REVEREND R. L. HOPE and SHERMAN SMITH, to answer certain interrogatories that said plaintiffs are ORDERED that they answer interrogatories as set out in order; plaintiffs are further ORDERED , to fila written answers within 20 days of this order; Defendants’ 

motion is DENIED as to those numbered interrogatories as more fully set out in order and plaintiffs! objections are sustained; M/E No. 
39,542; wet, 

Copy of M/E No. 39,542 mailed attorneys, wet, 

51 Motion for certification of class filed by plaintiffs; referred to 
Magistrate; notice mailed gliomeyt wet 

52{ Appearance of Counsel for plaintiffs riled by Jack Greenberg, James 
M. Nabrit, III end Charles E. Williams, III, Ajr 

filed by plaintiffs, Referred to Magistrate on 1-7-7 y JO 

GRANTED to January 8, 1976, Notices mailed to attorneys, jb 

6 [Supplemental Answers of plaintiff, Wiley L. Bolden, to defendants' interrogatories filed, o'b : 
7 Pupplemental Answers of plaintiff, Sherman Smith, to defendants! 

interrogatories filed, o'b : 
8 [Supplemental Answers of Plaintiff, John L. LeFlore, to defendants! . interrogatories filed, o'db 5 : : 
9 Motion to dismiss certain plaintiffs, RODNEY O. TURNER & CHARLES 

JOHNSON, without prejudice, filed by other plaintiffs, o'b 
LJ 

J retrial set 4th day of February, 197¢ entered by Judge Pittman filed, copies of order mailed to attor- neys on 01-07-76 by Mrs. Madge Andress, grs, 

filed 1-8-76 1a GRANTED, Notices mailed to attorneys, 
action, Minute Entry No. 39, mailed to attorneys Ajr 

Magistrate on 1-21-76, 4b 
: (SEE CONTINUATION SHEET)   

  

    

  

  

  [=
 

SiVIL DOCKET @ 

CPLAINTIFE 

WILEY L 

'! pare 
ston mers s—y 

1-20-76 

1-21-76 

1-26-76 

2-17-7164 7 

2-19-76( 

2-25-76 
3-8-76 
J3-10-7 

3-12-74 
3-12-76 

D4 - 02-74 

04-07-71     
 



  

  

  

      

  

    

  

  

  

VIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEET 
: ey friar DEFENDANT ; 75.2 H ee PAGES ’s 

- WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA Sa 
PAGE x. OF ____ PAGES 

ri ' pare NA, PROCEEDINGS 

1-20-76] 63 Supplemental answers to defendants’ interrogatories filed by ee = plaintire, ib 
4s 64 | Supplemental answers to defendants’ interrogatories filed by plaintife, jb y 1-21-76) 65 | Motion to compel defendants to answer interrogatories and produce 1815, Jv i documents filed by plaintiffs, Referred to Magistrate, ib 3 J 1-26-76] 66 | Motion to dismiss certain plaintiffs without prejudice filed by plaintiffs, jb uction | 67 | Supplemental answers to defendants’ interrogatories filed by i 3 defendant PURIPOY, 3b . - endantst 63 | Supplemental answers to defendants’ interrogatories filed by § *4 : defendant TAYLOR, jb ile LEY L. i 69 Supplemental answers to defendants! interrogatories filed by tain 

defendant LeFLORE, J . SWF ' 1-28-76] 70 | Supplemental answer to Plaintiffs' Third Discovery Notice filed ORDERED defendants, (Je) i ants! 1-29-76] 71 Supplemental answers of plaintiff to defendants! interrogatories » fully : | filed by plaintiff MAXWELL, Jb /E No. 72 Supplemental soswers, of jal tiff to defendants’ interrogatories 
j p2-03-76 Derbi E000" oR BORIA EEE VOYLES filed, grs. 2-3-76 | 73 | Joint Pretrial Document filed by parties, wet, 2--4- CASE PRE TRIED ON 4 FEB, 1976 BY JUDGE VIRGIL PITTMAN. (W.J.0.) ; ed to D2-05-74 74 |ORDER entered on pertrial hear s- copies mailed to attorneys by 

Mrs. Madge Andress, grs. : James 2-17-T§ 75 Rmended Motion to compel defendants to answer interrogatories and 
produce documents filed by Plaintiffs, Referred to Magistrate on fes ‘2-19-76, Jb : 2-19-76| 76 | Response to plaintiffs' "Amended Motion to compel defendants to * answer interrogatories and produce documents" filed by detenyanty, n 

its, Jb 2-25-T6| 77 | Specification of racially discriminatory acts filed by plaintiffs, <<. ants! 3-8-76 | 78 | Amendment to response to “Discovery Notice 1", filed by defendants ,wdt. it 3-10-76 79 | Motion filed by plaintiffs on 2-17-76 is MOOT, Notices mailed to -S } attorneys, jb : ? 
nts’ 3-12-76 Status Report, no problems. Judge Pittman to set date for trial, wet, 3-12-76 lotion to dismiss certain plaintiffs without prejudice, filed by ES i plaintiffs Jan. 26, 1976 subnitted without argument, Ajr { 2 DU-02-7§ B8O[Notice of taking the deposition of DR. JAMES E, VOYLES filed by ER the plaintiff, ars. xy, 197¢ ba 04-07-74 81| ORDER entered DISIISSING plaintiffs RAYMOND SCOTT and ED WILLIAMS D> attor; without prejudice. See lin. Entry No. 40,Ul41, copy railed to Z attorneys Stein, Blacksher, Still, Greenberg, Nebrit, ¥ilita-s, SON : Bagwell, Arendall and Sheppard on 04-08-76, grs. : CL-20-T] 82 [Subjects of defense evidence as tc responsivencss filed b: de ercant.} er ; i} 5-11-74 83 [Notice of taking deposition of TONY PARKER filed by defendants, ‘Tt ©-17-74 3% [Notice of taking derosition of DR. CHARLES COTRELL filed tv S defenderts, 4b 

2-02-71 25 |Motice of taking the “deposition of DR. CHARLES COTRELI, ~ile< bite 
defendants, rrs, 

AI (-16-T6 Deposition of DR. MELTON ALONZA McLAURIN filed, mpc 

DC 111A (Rev. 1/78)         
Oo 

   



  

CIVIL DOCKET CONS 
CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEET , 

PLANTIFP 
  

  

          

  

  

PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT = 

: ; DOCKET NO. q5-297- i 

BOLDEN, WILEY L., ET AL CITY OF MOBILE, ET AL sacels oF. MAGES 
DATE NA, : PROCEEDINGS Tf oars item 

. pa-ar-v pcs 
0-21-74 102 Opinion and order with Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law 

entered that there shall be elected in the August, 1977 municipal 
election, a mayor elected at-large and nine council members 
elected from nine single-member districts. Plaintiffs’ claims * 59 
for attorneys! fees & costs will be determined after a hearing 7-8-76 
on these issues, It is court's judgment that this decree this 
date is a final judgment & decree from whiwh an appeal may be 7-9-76 
taken. However, in event it is not a final decree, court ex mers 
motu pursuant to 28 USC 1292(V) ‘finds that a controlling Questicn 
of law is involved, Court retains Jurisdiction of this action to 
secure compliance with its decree issued contemporanecusly herewith 
& for such other & further relief as may be equitable & just; 
M/E No. 42,074; copy given this date to attorneys J. U, Blacksher 
and David fagie11. On 10-22-76 copy mailed attorneys Edward Still 
and 8S, R, Sheppard, wet, a ; com . . . 

10-22-7p 103| JUDGMENT entered as set out in above opinion of 10/21/76; M/E io. 
42,080; copy mailed attorneys, wet, 

7-13-74 9L 

» 

7-14-76 92   
» 

.0-28-76 104| Amendment to correct opinion & order dated 10/21/76 as more fully 
SeseTieg dn anendment; M/R No. 42,123; copy mailed attorneys 
on 11-1-76, wet, ae : 

1-3-76 | 105 [PLANTIFFS' PLAN H filad, being a plan for nine districts in the City 
. of Mobile and a ward breakdown showing the number of black citi- 

zens residing in each ward according to the 1970 census, (Map 
- attached as Exhibit A, placed in red folder.) mpc 

1-17-76 106{Mmtion to reconsider order of Octeber 21, 1976 filed by defendants 
{intsrvenors) Ar 

107 |Motion to intervene as defendants under Rule 24, filed by intervenor: 
Chris M. Zsrocostas, Joe Sirmon and Mikes Jacobs AjJr 

7-19-76 93 

7-20-74 Sl 

7-21-76] 9% 

11-18-78 108| Notice of Appeal filed by defendants, wet, 

  
P9-09-784 o& 

109] Security for costs on appeal filed by defendants, wet, 9-17-76] 9° 
Copy of Notice of Appeal and certified copy of docket entries whe =, 
to Clerk, Sth CCA, wet, - . 

Copy of Notice of Appezl mailed attorneys for appellees (plaintiffs), ‘ 
wet, y ‘ ; : 6 

-15- 
11-18-76 110| AMENDMENT to the.opinion and order of 10/21/76 entered as more fully a o 

; set ‘out in amendment; M/E No. 42,272-B; copy mailed attorneys 
on 11/19/78, wet, 0-13-78 95 

111{ ANENDAERT to the judgment entered 10/21/76 entered as more fully set : 4 3-7 9 
out in amendment; M/E No. 42,272-A; copy mailed attorneys on 10-6-75 [10G 
11/19/78, wet, SE / RC 

1-19-76 Motion to reconsider order f 10/21/76 filed by defendants-intervenqrs 
i is argued and TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION, wet, : ; 

Motion to intervene as defendants under Rule 24 filed by intervenors 10-14-7101   
CHRIS M. ZAROCOSTAS, JOE SIRMON and MIKE JACOBS is argued and 85 
TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION, wet, : Lio 

  

PC.IIA RIV. (1/79)           
  

   



    

  

  

  

Aa
 

A)
 

ffs), 

fully   ' set 

rvenqrs 

¥! 
pnors 

Hd 

14 1]   
  

  

0 . 

To
 

  

SN
 

[4]
 

55
 

5 
a 

a 

- [4
 

] 

~ 

= 

  

4
 
A
C
 

CE 
By
 

  

wh
 

CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUAY BEY 

  

        
  

  

PLANTIPP DEPENDANT 
» DOCKET NO. 

raced os PAGES 

DATE MA, . aie [PROCEEDINGS : 

. Po-21-7} 30 |Submission of qualifications of experts filed by defendant, with 
: = attachments, grs.: ; 

5-22-75] 87 |itness list filed by plaintiffs, Jb 
6-24-73 58 |Motice of taking deposition of CAIN J. KENNEDY filed by plaintiffs, i> 

* ] 59 |iotice of taking deposition of ROBERT EDINGTON filed by plaintiffs, id 

7-8-76 Deposition of DR. CORT B. SCHLICHTING filed, mpc 
Deposition of ROBERT 8. EDINGTON filed, mp : 

7-9-76 Deposition of GARY COOPER filed, mpc : 
Deposition of CAIN J, KENNEDY filed, i 13 . c by mip ihe 

HE - 95754 90 33rd SERIE TR IR 1 RE SEndt 2543 Bah PR Ra RE 
: completed at 5:10 P.M., Court recessed to 7-13-76 at 9:00 A.M., 

M/E No, 41,2 3 copy mailed attorneys on 7-15-76, wat, 
7-13-74 91 {Trial resumed, witnesses examined, exhibits offered & Court recessed 

at 4:50 P.M. to T-1h4-T76 at 9:00 A.M., M/E No, 41,2683A; copy mailed 
attorneys on 7-15-76, wet, 

7-15-76] 92 [Trial resumsd, witnesses examined, exhibited offered & Court recessed 
at 4:55 P.M, to Monday, July 19, 1976, at 9:00 A.M., M.E. No. 
41,289-A. Copy of M.E. 41,289-A mailed to Attorneys of Record on 

: July 21, 1976. (W.J.0.) wih 
7-19-76] 93 [Trial resumed, witnesses examined, exhibits offered & Court recessed 

at 5:00 P.M. to Tuesday, July 20, 1976, at 9:00 A.M., M.E, No. 
<A. bh) 303:A mailed to Attorneys of Record on 

Hn 197ERY (Bf Me®y 112303 y 
7-20-78 94 | Trial resumed, witnesses examined, exhibits offered & Court recessed 

at 4:45 p.m, to Wednesday, July 2, 1976, at 9:00 a.m., M. E. No. 
41,318-A. Copy of M. E. No. 41,318-A mailed to attorneys of 
record on July 23, 1976. Jrb. . 

7-21-76] 95 | Trial resumed, witnesses examined, exhibits offered & defendants 
rest at 5:02 p.m. The Court ordered that the triel bs recessed 
to be set down for arguments at a later date. M. E. No. 41,323-B. 
Copy of M. E. No. 41,323-B mailed to attorneys of record on 
July 23, 1976. Jb. 

P9-09-78 96 |Plaintiffs' submission of plans filed, grs. 
9-17-76| 97 | TRIAL RESUMED for post-trial arguments, arguments heard, and trial 

RECESSED to a later date for AZEEAENLS on the Plans submitted by 
; the parties, (Minute Entry No. 41737-B). mpc 

Copies of Mimite Entry No. 41737-B mailed to all attorneys of record 

9-15-76 Conauation of Deposition of DR. CHARLES L. COTRELL filed, mpc 

{10-48-76 98] Plaintiffs! interrogatories regarding attorneys' fees filed by 
plaintiff, Jrb. : 

40-13-76 99 [Answer and Objection filed by all defendants, (Je) 

J0-6-75 {100 |ORDER entered appointing JOSEPH N, LANGAN, ARTHUR R, OUTLAW and 
JAMES E, BUSKEY as committee to formulate plan for mayor-council 
form of government & committee is given target date to report to 
{0 Sours of 12-11-76; M/E No, U1,943-D; copy mailed attorneys on 

-15- wat : 

10-14-7101 Submi as on of population estimates for Plan F, filed by plaintiffs, x 
wet,      



    

ty 

CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEKT #9) ® =e) "4 PL LO RT 

  

  PLAINTIFF 

BOLDEN, WILEY L., ET AL CITY OF MOBILE, ET AL pocket no. T5=297-P 
DEFENDANT 

    PAGE __OF___ PAGES 

  

PROCEEDINGS 

  

2-2-77 126 

2-15-77] 127 

2-17-77 

2-28-77 

. 3--2-7% 

3-4-77 

3-9-77 p28 

3-18-7f 129 

130 

3-23-77|131 

3-23-77 

bo7-77 | 132   

-{Pepositions of GROVER CLEVELAND THORNTON, III, ROBERT S. VAKCE, 

ORDER entered that motion to intervene filed by HENRY REMWBERT, 
EXECUTIVE SECRETARY OF TEE GULF COAST PARENT ACTION LEAGUE on 
1-4-77 & amended on 1-17-77 is DENIED; M/E No. 42,840-D; on 2-4-77, 
copy mailed attorneys and Henry Rembert, wet, 

Stipulation for temporary retention of record filed by parties, wet] 

Certified copy of docket entries mailed to Clerk, Sth CCA and 
to attorneys, wet, : 

JAMES A. HARRIS, JR. & EDWARD MALCOLM FRIEND, III, grs. : 
On 2 Mar, 1977 received from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Cir- 

cult, an ORDER reading as follows: "ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that 
appellants’ moticn to enlarge the time for the filing of the 
record cn appeal including the court reporter's transcript to 
and including March 4, 1977, is GRANTED." (W.J.0.) 

Court Reporter's transcript of trial proceedings filed, 
1,503 pages, wet, 

ORDER entered adopting mayor-council plan (Appendix A) and plz’z- 
tiffs' plan for nips singles-member council districts(ippendix 2), 
and directing thatthe regularly scheduled city elections I= 
August, 1977, and each four years thereafter, the City cf Motille 
shall elect nine members to a city council and 2 meycr. One 
member of the City Council shall be elected by and fron each 
district. The mayor is to be elected at-large, The Court 
reserved a decision upon the plaintiffs' claim for attorneys’ 
fees and out-of-picket expenses, (Minute Entry No. 43081). coc 

Copies of Minute Entry No. 43081 mailed to all attorneys of record, 
on iy * c 

NOTICE OF PEER from the order of March 9, 1377, the cpinion and 
order entered on October 21, 1976 and the judgment entered on 
October 22, 1976 filed by defendants, lps . 

Application for stay pending eppeal, with brief attached, filed by 
defendants; referred to Judge Pittman, lps 

Plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ application for stay pending 
appeal filed, wet, 

Application for stry pending appeal filed by defendants on 2/18/77 
and plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants' application for stey 

ORDER entered STAYING the court's prior orders requiring 2 meyor- 
council election in August, 1977; directing that precareticns 
for elections under the city commission form of gcvernxent 
shall be held as regularly scheduled in August, 1977, el} pend- 
ing result of eppeal to Fifth Circuit, (Minute Entry Ko. L32£3), 
Copy of order delivered to J. U. Blecksher on 4-7<77; to CT. E. 
Arendal, Jr. on 4-8-77; copies mailed to attormeys Still, 
Greenberg, etc. and Sheppard on 4-11-77. mpc 

I 

pending appeal filed 3/23/77 are argued & TAKEN UNDER SUBMISSION, wet,   
OT YA mer gro '   ss ig : 

V
a
a
l
 

ee
 

SE
Y 

  

    

© CIVIL Dw 
frre or 

PLAINES 

T
R
I
E
R
    



* CIVIL DOCKET CONTINUATION SHEET 00) Mie} 14.90 S08 3800 
  

  

      

  

    

’e PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT 
—-— J DOCKET NO. 
97-P % 

PAGE __ OF. _____ PAGES 
AGES = DATE | nn. | PROCEEDINGS 

¥ r————shr = i. Or —. 3A TL mar 
H ' 

BR Pi 1~18-77,133 Notice of Appeal of order of 4-7-77 filed by plaintiffs, wet, 
134 | Security for costs on appeal filed by plaintiffs; wet, 

77 pee 4-26-77/ 135 | Stipulation for temporary retention of record filed by parties; wet, 

[ 4 

wet 

Iv 

 - 

X= = 
ot: A 

x EB); 

=3le   
=, wet, 

  

  
} . OC 111A REV (VTS)       
 



p
e
r
 

T
T
 

TT
R 
T
U
T
T
I
     

    

  

  

                    
  

                    
  

  

  

  

  

      
    

   
   

- _-_ ET-U.S. PPEALS . <a DOCKET-U.S. COURT OF A 6/0775 ek wi [5 

SUBJECT 2 CROSS APPEAL NO. CASE NUMBE us 
> 8 pe : 2 i nTLe:  BOLDEN, 

Ela |a3le [23a] 8 |uslal Of x] 2 |E5]33 36 : i — 
less |v [as(Qu] 2 [daa] 3X] & |o2|G= CL) - 4 2 1 ( “14. RECORD, EXHIBITS 

(pees 1__ partial R 

hs ecm - -! Record ¢ 

CIRCUIT 5 APPEAL FROM Southern oisTRicTor Alabama ~~~ ar___ Mobile Dy rman SUPP. 
t pi cies SECON 

DATE DOCKETED — 11/26/76 sso reepaio 11/26/76 JupGE Virgil Pittman 3 -n Exhibits 
Sey Append 

DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED 11/19/76 1 EE Former 

pits : —. Adminis 

D.C. DOCKET NUMBER CA-75-297-P ul gt Briefing 
4 hn > Brief for 

¢-Exp ap 
/ 31 hen Brief for 

iy B-37-77 over foe 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, Et Al., $7 La Brief for 
Brief fos 

Plaintiffs-Appellees, Reply B 
Supp. B 

versus Supp. B 

Brief fo 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA; Et Al., Interver 
Rule 13 

RULE 30]c) 
  
   

  Defendants-Appellants, 
  

  

Consolidated with No. 76-3619 & 77-11 f= 
& No. 77-2032 

  

  

  

  

APPEARANCE 

| FILED-DATE |CODE | ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT 
  

  

    

  

  
. |S.R. Shepp 

Nm, C. Tidwell:, P. 0. B 205) (432-551) 
ots bp Charles B, Arendall, Jr, -do- y AE 
2-&-7¢ | ALXCharles 5, Rhyne, 1000 Conn. Ave., N.W., Suite 800, Washingtann_c_l fle 7 

ty 

  

  

    

  

  

    

  

      

  

  

  

  

  

              

  

            
      
      

  

  

  

ee-2 Wig vu, Blacksher, =~d0- i 

A : Mobile, Als... 38601. ——— ere Order c 

6-1-77 V [William S, Rhyne, 1000 Conn. Ave. sil Hat Sult e800, Waghinegign® | Affida 
(202-466-5420) C. 20036 CJA 2C 

C~ 
A ~~ Notice 

’ 1} ZN tessa $i 4-13-71) Appens 
; f OJ re Y. ba) aS/le-2)  Appeis 

fey , : nl = ia al Design 

J » H — ny \ fond & Orde 

LY en xt: Ar = \ ML I —t- | OER rc Nr Nr | ' of CJA 2 

pi 
- ry = > Ack Eannnce [cooe ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE y Sade 

Gregory B, Stein, 14 —   

    

  

  

    

  

-do-_ (205) 432-1691 #83. AGENCY REVIEW 
  

  

/2-b-7% |Z |Larry Meneiee, 
2 
  

  

  

  

  

  

2-6-7¢ |  |Jack Greenberg, Suite 20 

AL. 

Charles E. Williams, III, -do- SY. 
Eric Schnapper, , -do-_ (212) 586-8397 i 12-6-76 

  

  

fo 7 ~'|Edward Still, Sujte 601, Title Bldg., 2030 3rd. Ave. N., Birminghes. g Petitic 
Ala. 35203 RET 0 

BR WE | Applic 

= ti J i Answe 

James M. Nabrit, TIX =dO= SN AISI 

  

  
  

  v 

  ArpANLCLS CURIAE (See Reverse for additional Amicus Attorneys) 

  

2d “United States Court of Ap 

  

- 

  

R
T
 
a
 
E
T
 
A
 

Fg
 
r
r
 

Tea
r 

ny
 

        
    =21-77 | : ey, Atty., Civil Rights Div., Appellate Sect., 1 

U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, B.C. 20530 Be 

(for U.S.A.) 8 

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circdit — Docket, Form 1 (Rev. 4/74) 1U Paor 1 nf 4 1 n 

 



E NUMBER 
., 
a —— 

“ f. 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

= 

ees, 

ants, 

76-3619 & 77-11 
=O, - 

205°) (432-5511 
Sp—— iy Eehiniont oi 

01. ‘ag 

6 

  PS 

  

  

    
  

  

  

  

  
  

  
  

  

  

   

      

      

   

al
 

ae
et
 

25,
 

TR
 
R
e
 

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    

    

  

  

  

  

    
  

  

  

      
  

  

  

  

  

  

oh 
¢ wr * 

Poy = -~ 
i frie 

TILE: BOLDEN, Et Al, -vs- CITY OF MOBILE, ALA., Et Al. m5 6- 4 2 1 { 

+ Rpm—— 

44. RECORD, EXHIBITS AND BRIEF INFORMATION | Filing: 4. EXTENSION Flg. Motion for: Order Fid. | Ext. to 

2% 1] Partial Record or Cert. List NEY LY I A Record, Trans Trango 2%) 713-11 J-4-%, 

go BML S00 Record on Appeal No. of Vols, 5 Appendix ies G. 

mimesis Supp. Record No. of Vols. Appellant's Brief 

SRR Et JN Second Supp. Record Ni Vols. Appellant's Brief 

=} Exhibits 0 env. hey oss [J Ron Appellant's Brief 

Appendix [J (P) wn Tel). I+ 7 \ 

irs Former Appeal Record 77- 36 ) Appelles’s Brief 

pil —. Administrative Transcript Appellee’s Brief 

y; : Briefing Notice Issd. Appaliee’s Brief 

Y =f 7- ) ) Brief for Appellante (9 ) 

T* _ Brief for Appellant ov Reply Brief 

bp Brief for Cr. Appellant =) 7 
' 

3-37-77 Brief for Avoeties Si or (7) 

= Brief for Appellee 

Brint for Or ADDER este 5 CALENDAR INFORMATION 
Reply Brief for Appellan 

Supp. Brief for Appellant Rule 18 Notice Issued TT 

Supp. Brief for A S/o Panel a 

or Amicus 
o- 27 Case Ass, for é -/3 77 hg 

Intervenor 
Ow Oe o 

Rule 13(a) Certificate 
Case Cont'd for Reassignment 

Case or for [lal 
  

®) Pa "a BT 

  
  Hearing Panel: —_mw 

43-777 Case Argued a HE a 
  

| Filing Case Sub. w/o Arg J by Appellant 0 by Appe!le= 
  

11/26/76 Dup. Notice of Appeal and Clerk's 

Statement of Docket Entries 

Papers Trans. from Misc. No. 

  

6. OPINION INFORMATION 
  

  

-3-212 Order of ki Ext. Time to File Record 

WL to 

  

  

  

2 i * Order of DC Granting Appeal |FP 

Order of DC Appointing Counsel 

  

Affidavit of Financial Status 

CJA 20dssd./Voucher Recd. 

  

  

Notice of Election Rule 30lc) 

) y - [ 3 - ] ) Appellant's Designation 

Appellees Designation 

Designation 

  

  

Order to Show Cause - 

Loca! Rule 9(b) Disrmissal Order 

CJA 21 for Transcript 

Qade. J HC. Ext vi nte IR L. facecife 
=2-9-7Y 

  

    

  

  

  

  

3-29-2% Opinion Rendered 

FE. — 3 Reversed 

| | Attd. in Pt, P.C. Conc, Spec. 

[1] Dismissed [ Rule 21 Lo 3 Dis. in on 

igh” Withdrawn 

GB I | Affirmed 

lr] = n | Vacated Signed Ds. 

76-3619, gar 42173043 | 
  

  

  {34vc. = aps dee (C tad 14 bs 

PY PES Dt, at gle 2A 2 NE ET 
  

  

7. REHEARING INFORMATION 
  

Mot. for Ext. — Ext. to:   

  

Mot. for Ext. — Ext. to:   

  

Petition for Rehearing   —————————— 

  

  

3. AGENCY REVIEW CASES | Fing 

0 Appellant 0 Appellee £) Reg. {J En Bane 

——o. Petition for Rehearing 

[J Appeiiant 0 Appellee 0 Reg. [J En Bane 

  

  

  

  

  

  

_orneys) 

Sect., 
  

  

  

Paor 1 nf 4 

  

   

    

kr United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit — Docket, Form 1A (Rev. 4/74) 

Petition for Review of Order ( ) of 

Owners Orpc 0 
Application for Enforcement — NLRB 

  

Aa 

  

fr 
; pa. J i Answer to Application for Enforcement 

LEN. Cross Application for Enforcement 

— Response of   

Order Denying Rehearing 

Dissenting 

[J opinion 59 

  

[1] Order on Petition for Rehearing $9 

  

  
  

Page 3 of 4 pages



  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    

  

  

  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

      

   
          

  

  

  

  

    
  

  

  

      

  
  

  

  

  

    

  
  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

    

  

  

      
    

  
  

  Se Record on Appeal Retd. tks) 

= 7=7L exhivits Ror; to Clerk 

  

  

  

  

Notice of Denial of Pet. for Rehearing . 

Opinion of S.C. dated 

Judgment of S.C. 

  

  

Mandate Stayed to a       
    1< 

  

  

    

'. MOTIONS 

ng Motion to or for: Response Filed By Date Granted | Denied ag, 

Mandamus 

Docket Appeal Out of Time 

Reinstate Appeal 

Stay Further Proceedings in CA 

— Stay Pending Appeal 

eee. I0junction Pending Appeal 

lel... Consolidate Appeals (4/17 -2042) vv GAT 

Leave to Appeal IFP 

Bail Pending Appeal 

Withdraw as Counsel 

Appointment of Counsel 

Leave to File Supp. Record 

—— Hearing on Original Record 

—. Hearing on Orig. Rec. & Typed Brief 

—. Leave to File Typed Brief 

~H- 7 7 Leave to File Brief in Excess Pgs. Sap foe 9 4 -/3- nz 

Dismiss by Appellant 

Disrmss by Appellee 

rr ————aap—re. Gob riae : 

18-37. 04% ¢ Syl Go rief {ageeiiot. vv AT o-22 il 

5 LR Stay of Mandate 47 A pase y. 171-28 Vv’ BT 

Recall of Mandate 

OTHER DOCKET ENTRIES CODE TO ENTRIES co 

2/20/76 Flg. suggestion of appellants requesting that ARG — Argued Flg. 
this cause be heard and decided in conjunction CE — Clerk's Endorsement '- 
with #76-3619 - Blacks United for Lasting E  - East Courtroom 
Leadership, Inc., et al. vs. City of Shreveportf® — En Banc Courtroom n 
et al. and suggestion for hearing en banc.j-}-)7f JF Pr 

'/22/76 | Flg, appellees' response to appellants’ suggestion —— Handwritten 
with respect to appellate review of this 4 laa Sent 10 Judges Fi 
cause in conjunction with #76-3619, /- (Te, Cy Lovee E. 

1/14/77, Flg. order DENYING petition for hearing en Mire Or Otfsst ch 
A banc. (TGG) (Also fld 76-3619) PT Print 

/14/7 Yr Say GRANTING appellants’ motions to consoliBT Preliminary Type Flg. 2 
date 76-3619 and 76-4210; further order GRANTIRG -—Sm ves Flg. € 
motions to expedite appeals; further order 59 =SesSactiong 
DENYING appellees' motion to dismiss caused Sub — Submitted #10/10/78 Flg. 
76-3619. (Also fld. in 76-3619) (RAA-LRM-TGG)| T ~Tveed \$10/12/78 | Fig. 

/7/77  |Flg. appellants' suggestion for joint hearing* RE mn 3 
with #76-2951 - Nevett, et al, v. Sides, et al. 

JUDGMENT OR MANDATE INFORMATION 11. SUPREME COURT INFORMATION ML Sd SR 

$d Bil of Costs Preparing Proceedings on Certiorari - Hey 3 

Fig. & Entg. Judgment Preparing Supp. Proceedings on Cart. 2 - 

Issg. Copy of Jdgt. to Bd & Cnsl. Transmitting Orig. Exhibits to S.C. Bd di 

$ dqt. as Mdt. Issd. to Clerk $ Order of S.C. — Ext. to 

Jdgt. as Mdt. Reissd. to Clerk 7-5-7%_ Notice of Fig. of Cert. Pet. on lr -A7-74_ 

Dismissal Issd. to Clerk Order of S.C. [J Denied [J Granted 
  

     



TLinga-Lroveedanygs 

  

Flg. appellees’ response to suggestion for joint hearing with 426-2051 
(Charles Nevett, et' al.) =- / - Wore) 
  

  

  

Flg. response of appellees, yiley. L. Bolden, et al. to suggestion for 
JoIrmt NSurIng. I-7- C o # rg Tv 

/ 

  

  

4376/77 Flg. Order GRANTING appellants' suggestion for joint hearing of this c: 
En with —#76~2951—~Nevett; vot al v, Sides, ote. ot 31 CIGG) + 
  

  

Flg. supplemental memorandum in support of motion of appellants for 
  

BL 

leave to file brief exceeding fifty pages. 

Flg. Order GRANTING appellants’ motion for leave to file their brief i: 
S agr-1imit tation GBT) 

lg. appellees' motion for order restoring injunction. H-27-27 

Flg. appellants’ memorandum in opposition to appellces’ motion for ord: 
TESTOTINE INJUNCTION. 22-57-77 (667) ~ 

FIg. appellees’ motion for leave to file brief ip gxeess of 79 typed PE. 

TT FIg. Order CARRYING WITH THE CASE appellees’ motion for order restorin: 
rede i RF URG HO Ron bore d—by—di gt re tr CIMWABS AG PTY 
$/31/77 |Flg. Order GRANTING appellees' motion for leave to file brief in exces 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

  

      
  

   

  

  

      

  

  

    
  

  

  

a 70 pgs. other than standard typographic printing but not to excee: 
roe a0 pgs. (GBT) 

h 8/80 Flg, motion of The United States to file a brief as Amicus ourise.... 
X37 Fld. 76-381 ur i 2 (Also F1 in V4 Vinyl car) 

| Minute Entry - Court granted pazties 20 dave to file supplemental... 

: briefs to be filed simultaneously by each side in typewxitten forr 
After a bench conference the Court will stay any election until 

—TRIES $5 .y, the questions in this case are decided. 

= enum Flg. order DENYING appellee's motion for an order restoring injunction 

=e jv | _wntered by the district court; further order GRANTING appeii-e o- 
m=room ol motion to stay holding of elections of any kind by governwent ~ 

i a of city of Mobile, Alabama, until further mdvice by the court, 
I. (JMW-BS-GBT) 

hs Flg. Order GRANTING motion of ¥.S. for leave to file brief as amicus 
ot EF : AT) 

=o £6/19/78 Flg. Appellants' notice of appeal to Supreme Ct. 
  

¥10/6/78 Flg. Order of Supreme Ct. noting probable jurisdiction. : 
2 (x 27 /O- - 

#10/10/78 Flg. Appellees' motion to vacate order staying elections {sued by fis: 

Ho/az/rs Flg. Order DENYING appellees' motion to vacate order staying elections 

Issued by Dist. Tt. (JMW/GBT). 

  

  

  

  
  

y ol f elcotions =. aL CC gaigae 
- - - ram. — He EE Ra 

  

PEE ~ cam —-—- ar > : Bh a PE 
we oT SFT IR TRARB RITA LEE ap igh EE PN 
  

. : . o cay YT w- - ia Zr ; - - 

    

  

  
      

    

  

  
  
       



  

6/9/75     

  

   
    

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

vi le SUBJECT CROSS APPEAL | NO. 
« > 33 jE wa r oy 
rl, fh - [-] 3} > 41 
3a [v3 |eSlgsl x]. of 21x] 61223 : gy == =n no > 21>0 

|E5|25 (85 (85]0u | 2 [Va ]¥] 3 |<] & |82|c= 5% 6 

ij i x it gCORD, EXHIBITS AN                                     

_ Partial Recor 

E Record on Am 

Supp. Recorc 

POCA Rr — [i CIRCUIT § APPEAL FROM Southern oisTRICT OF —Alabana a A 

    

  

DATE DOCKETED 5/19/77 $50 FEE PAID 5/1 9/17 Second Suph 

Exhibits 

DATE NOTICE OF APPEAL FILED 3/18/77 Appendix 
Former Appes 

D.C. DOCKET NUMBER CA-75-297-P 
  Administrative 

Briefing Noti= 
  

4 

   
   

   

{ fe RE Brief for Apps 
oy P Jey Yor ", Brief for Apps 

Brief for Cr, = WILEY L. 'BOLDEN, ET A AL. ve Brief for Apps 
" Tod Brief for Apps 

Fai 
Go Brief for Cr. = 

Go, Reply Brief f= 

Supp. Brief fc 

Supp. Brief fc 

Brief for Ami 

‘versus 

     

  

     

  

     
  

  

  

  

    
  

        

  

  
  

  
  

      
  

  

    
       

  
  

  

  

                              

  

  

    

  

  

  

  

  
    

  

      
    

  

    

SEL SE intervenor __ 
: Fu  Detongunta-sopettanta Be Rule 13(s) Ca 

~d i * fo preg > hie'2 EER HERR 43 Z 

APPEARANCE RET Ee RL 

FILED—DATE |CODE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT 
\ 2 7 77 Q08- . ’ ? Dup. Notice © 

well, III, ~do= —, Suvemant 
Travis H. Bedsole, At. =do- : : LT nan Papers Yram, 

: RT = 2 Order of DC © 

Fred G Collins City Atty Legal De t of the Cit £ M ] 11 sii to. 20 

- Hall, Mobile Ala 36602 ° Order of DC « 

Order of DC 

5-777 | F |Charjes 1000 Conn. Ave, RAE LTT Xa — Affidavit of F 
Bd 5 (202-466-5420) "7 Zsa Ao 50 ~ 20036 ww CIA 20 lsd. / 

: Donald A, Carr, -do- a x 113 Stet of Se 

atzen, : es =do= NC “Tih Poe's 
4 . { a a TE A F— 

A | 1 \ N\ Ley ~~ Ad J Le Designation _ 

v : S oad ry | ; — Order to Shos 

WA a TS 5 ~ | i Loca! Rule 98 
Fi ED-ATE | cone | atoms FoR ApELLEE fy SNORE ET cane 

Gregory B, S+«in vis Ave., Mobile, Ala. 36603 Fai fn 
5-27-77 I. hex, { YET LENT] ~d0- Shai MR 

arry Menelee, 2 ~do-  . - 
: 7% | RMGENCY REVIEW CASE: 

J-t2-72 |W |Edward Still, Suite 601, Title Bldg., 2030 3rd. Ave., N., Birmingha' [3 Eh 
__ R05).829 -%9Y Ala. 35203 ““*P" 4 Cine 

- - Application f | &-/-77 | 9% |Iack Greenberg, Suite 2030, 10 Columbus Circle, N.Y. N.Y. 10019  [& a 
2 James M. Nabrit, TIX, =do- IERIE Cron Appice 

Charles E._ Williams TIT, =d0= IE | 
  

¢-1-72 
  

  

  

pled States Court of Appests, F 
  

            

Vhalsnd Praca. Poviet al Armmaate fas sha Fila 7. de Maclas Chacon | INA, Ava) i 4 
-    



3/9/75 To] 

  

   

  

  

  

   

  

Bx Ae 

  

= Ee  BOLDEN, ET AL. -vs- CITY OF MOBILE, ET AL, NO. 77-204 
  

4. EXTENSION Flg. Motion for: Order Fid. Ext. to: 
  

‘ “R000 q ¥CORD, EXHIBITS AND BRIEF INFORMATION | Filing: 

fk Partial Record or Cart. List 

Record on Appeal No. of Vols. ol 

Record, Trans.   

Appendix     

  Appellant's Brief   

Appellant's Brief   
  

Supp. Record No. of Vols. 

Second Supp. Record No. of Vols. 

Exhibits Oenv. 0 Box Oleg. 0 Rol 

Appendix Oi Mim Volo. Wyler 

76-431 

5.25.7) 

Former Appes! Record 

Administrative Transcript 

Briefing Notice Issd, 

4 
Appellant's Brief _ -   

  
  

Appellee’s Brief   
  Appelles’s Brief 

Appelles’s Brief 
  

  

Brief for Appellant 

  

    

Brief for Appellant Reply Brief   

Brief for Cr, Appellant 

  
  

Brief for Appellee   
Brief for Appelles 

  
    

  

  Brief for Cr. Appellee 

Reply Brief for Appellant   
Supp. Brief for Appellant   
Supp. Brief for Appellees   
Brief for Amicus   
Intervenor   
Rule 13(a) Cartificate   

  

    

  

  

  

        

65. CALENDAR INFORMATION 
  

  

  

    

Rule 18 Notice Issued ; . 
  

  
Sul ry Panel: 

B-4-77 Case Assig for se in 

Ow Oe 0 i 

Case Cont'd for Reassignment t 

Case Reassigned for in   

Oe 
— 

(Jes 
             

   

Ow XT Hearing Panel: =   
    

Appellant$ ET Appellee S 

  

«2 Case Argued 

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

      
  

  

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

  

  

    

    

  

    
  

  

  

  

  
  
  

  
  

  

  

  

  

  
  

; ICELLANEOUS FILINGS | Filing: Case Sub. w/o Arg. 0 by Appetiant OJ by Appellees 

RoE 2 , Dup. Notice of Appes! and Clerk's 6. OPINION INFORMATION 

: - | Statement of Docket Entries 3-29-78 
ed ws Opinion Rendered AT 

Papers Trans. from Misc. No. 

Order of DC Ext. Time to File Record (CET Jattiomed  [ J we 
to__20-(F-I1 Reverted 

Order of DC Granting Appes! IFP co ang.inp. [J 7e [nee] Sone Spec 
| ] Vacated ( ») igned | is. i 

SS horas ou omni nett Jou inee 
Affidevit of Financial Status : | | * 3 % 

’e. :20 36 rang : CJA 20 is3d./Voucher Reed. y i > 

re Fp Notics of Election Rule 30(c) Opinion Withtrawn 
“Ey } Appellant's Designation 

EE 4 Re — Appeiiee’s Designation 

re dn | Desigr 

pry 1 | - Order to Show Cause — 7. REHEARING INFORMATION 

— } ar... a 3 2 Locs! Rule 8(b) Dismissal Order Mot. for Ewt. = Ext. to: 
4 A y Y . . . . 

ikisal {Meee CIA 21 for Transcript Mot. for Ext. — Ext. to: 
re man : Petition for Rehearing 

13 TOS | oy 0 Appellant 0 Appeliee a Reg. 0 en Banc 

— * Cophaper :: - Petition for Rehearing 

Ei LAGENCY REVIEW CASES | Filing: O Appetiant {OJ Acpeties [J Reg. [J En Banc 
$5 ; Response of Ry ES es Petition for Review of Order { ) of 

35203 PR dl : CY NLRE 0] Frc Oo, Order Denying Rh ing : 

— | Application for Enforcement — NLRB ferred Dissenting A 
N.Y. 10019 4 Tat i pr 

a : Answer to Application for Enforcement OJ opinion 59 e 

rege © Cross Application for Enforcement {J Order on Petition for Rehesring  §9 he 
Nt 

57 15 re 
  

  

  

    
  

  

      

    

  ro 
plas States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit — Docket, Form 1A (Rev. 4/74)   

 



  

  A a = 

MOTIONS 
  

  

By 

Court [Clerk 
  ng Motion to or for: Response Filed By Date Granted | Denied 

  IN 
FOR 

  
Mandamus 

Docket Appeal Out of Time 
  

  
ere R@INSate Appeal 

Stay Further Proceedings in CA 
  

Stay Pending apes 

nju Yen by n eal 

26=17 aA arn 1/24 - 4210 i QRT 

Leave to Appeal IFP 

Bail Pending Appeal 

Withdraw as Counsel 

Appointment of Counsel 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Leave to File Supp. Record 
  

Hearing on Original Record 

Hearing on Orig. Rec. & Typed Brief 

Leave to File Typed Brief 

Leave to File Brief in Excess Pgs. 

  

  

  

  

cee. Dismiss by Appellant 
  

Dismiss by Appellee 

imeem ies” ALCS Curize : : : ’ 

—£0-7] RLCRE: Fils WER Da ppl Vv (BT 

; -15 Stay of Mandate - 7 | A pallies Y-72-1% vv + 

Recall of Mandate 

  

  

22-7] 
  

  

  

  

                
  

OTHER DOCKET ENTRIES CODE TO ENTRIES 
  

  

  

    
  

  

  

  

  

    

  

  

  

      

/13/17 {Minute Entry = Court granted parties 20 days tp Ae ST ai ia WILL 
£3 1 1 t 3 | £% 1 a — orK's rse n 

ai 11 1 I Esa a 5 ide itd E — East Courtroom WILS 

form After a bench conference the Court wWillf® — En Banc Courtroom ° 
| stay any election until the questions in tHis F —F ’ 

as axe jecided. H - Handwritten 

/19/78 Fig. Appellants’ notice of appeal to Supreme Ct. 3° ree 0 duke 
10/6/78 Flg. Order of Supreme Ct. LE probable is EL  =tup 

Jurisdiction, WM: sim=Mimes be Ditin 
YT EEOC RL TR Vi Oi ii 1 ofuadantinpe’ fiom VS. 

Ll Aemiafiet Fn mer maBoTiGLA: senginFh PT = Praliminery Tyme 
oe oli {Tl 2 DREGE AN © SEF, 73 aswel " 

S9 — See Section TY 

Sub — Submitted CI 

~— Typed 

w — West Courtroom ALAE     
  '” JUDGMENT OR MANDATE INFORMATION 11. SUPREME COURT INFORMATION No. 7 77- JPY 
  

  

  

  

    
Bill of Costs Prepering Proceedings on Certiorari RN pS uy wid 

Flg. & Entg. Judgment Preparing Supp. Proceedings on Cert. ~~ IT od . C M_ 

Roo 1539. Copy of Jdgt. to Bd & Cnsl. Transmitting Orig. Exhibits to S.C. % ye ‘ ; 

Jdgt. as Mdt. Issd. to Clerk . Order of S.C. — Ext. to offici= 

Jdgt. as Mdt. Reissd. to Clerk 7-53-78 Notice of Fig. of Cert. Pet. on bo -A7-7F - 

Dismissal Issd. to Clerk Order of S.C. [J Denied [J Granted Comr 

/- VN 3 a Record on Appeal Retd. to Clerk €X vl 

Exhibits Retd. to Clerk 

  

    

  

Notice of Denial of Pet. for Rehearing . 

Opinion of S.C. dated 

Judgment of S.C. 

  

  

Mandate Stayed to 
      
  16  



  

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

R
E
M
A
N
 

  

  

| 

   e
. 

my
 

E
R
R
 

r
a
 

d
e
n
i
 

AE
 

TI
 

a
g
 

T
E
R
 

rT
 

ET
 

Ae
 

Ra
m 

SP 
TI
S 

Ne
at
 

E
I
S
 

  - WILEY L. BOLDEN, REV. RL. 
HOPE, CHARLES JOHNSON, 

- JANET O. LEFLORE, JOHN 
L. LEFLORE, CHARLES 
MAXWELL, OSSIE B. 

~ PURIFOY, RAYMOND SCOTT, 
. SHERMAN SMITH, OLLIE 
LEE TAYLOR, RODNEY O. 
TURNER, REV. ED WIL- 
LIAMS, SYLVESTER 
WILLIAMS AND MRS. F. C. 
WILSON, 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

      
  

  

CIVIL ACTION 
VS. 

NO. 75-297TH 

CITY OF MOBILE, 

ALABAMA; GARY A. 

GREENOUGH, ROBERT B. 

DOYLE, JR., AND LAMBERT 

C. MIMS, individually and in their 

official capacities as Mobile City 

Commissioners, 

  

) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

Plaintiffs; ) 

) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

Defendants. ) 

)     
 



  

    

COMPLAINT 

L 

Jurisdiction 

Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. | 

§ §1331 and 1343. The amount in controversy exceeds 
$10,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. This is a suit in 

equity arising out of the Constitution of the United States, the 

First, Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fiftteenth Amendments, 

and 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1973, 1983 and 1985 (3). 

IIL. 

Class Action 

Plaintiffs bring this action on their own behalf and on 

behalf of all other persons similarly situated pursuant to Rule 

23 (a) and 23 (b) (2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The 

class which plaintiffs represent is composed of black citizens 

of the City of Mobile, Alabama. All such persons have been, 

are being, and will be adversely affected by the defendants’ 

practices complained of herein. There are common ques- 

tions of law and fact affecting the rights of the members of this 

class, who are, and continue to be, deprived of the equal 

protection of the laws because of the election system detailed 

below. These persons are so numerous that joinder of all 

members is impracticable. There are questions of law and 

fact common to plaintiffs and the class they represent. The 

interests of said class are fairly and adequately represented 

18 

    

T
e
 

A
T
E
R
 

B
e
 

  
R
E
T
R
 
e
A
 

W
O
R
E
 

  
 



- 
9 

V
a
 

W
»
 

P
p
 

pa
d 

  

  

  

rt
 
n
n
 

g—
— 

Cr
 
a
 

I 
TE

TR
A 
C
n
 

. 
A
T
E
 

i
a
t
 

A
 

8 
on 

A
O
 

E 

  

by the named plaintiffs. The defendants have acted or 

refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, 

thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief and cor- 

responding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a 

whole. 

IIL 

Parties 

A. Plaintiffs Wiley L. Bolden, Rev. R. L. Hope, Charles 

Johnson, Janet O. LeFlore, John IL. LeFlore, Charles 

Maxwell, Ossie B. Purifoy, Raymond Scott, Sherman 

Smith, Ollie Lee Taylor, Rodney O. Turner, Rev. Ed. 

Williams, Sylvester Williams and Mrs. F. C. Wilson are 

black citizens of the City of Mobile, Alabama, over the age of 

21 years. 

B. Defendants, Gary A. Greenough, Robert B. Doyle, 

Jr., and Lambert C. Mims are each over the age of 21 years 

and are bona fide citizens of Mobile, Alabama. The de- 

fendants are the duly elected City Commissioners of Mobile. 

IV. 

Nature of Claim 

A. The Mobile City Commission is the governing body of 

the City of Mobile, holding the legislative power granted to 

cities. In addition, its members perform certain adminis- 

trative and executive functions. 

B. The Mobile City Commission is organized under Act 

19



  

—
—
X
 

163, Reg. Sess. 1911, as amended. 

  

    
C. The three (3) commissioners on the City Commission 4 - 

are elected at large to numbered places. wi ¢ 

D. The City of Mobile has a total population of 190,026, £ E 

of whom 35.4% or 67,356 are black. Certain areas of Mobile v t 

are almost totally devoid of blacks, while others are virtually 7 t 

all black. Segregated housing patterns have resulted in ¥ 

concentrations of black voting power. 2 : 

E. The present system of electing city commissioners 2 : 

discriminates against black residents of Mobile in that their # ! 

concentrated voting strength is diluted and canceled out by LY, : 

the white majority in the city as a whole. & 3 

Y. 

Plaintiffs and the class they represent have no plain, 

adequate or complete remedy at law to redress the wrongs 

alleged herein, and this suit for a permanent injunction is 

their only means of securing adequate relief, Plaintiffs and 

the class they represent are now suffering and will continue to 

suffer irreparable injury from the unconstitutional election 

system described herein. 

WHEREFORE, plaintiffs respectfully pray this Court to 

advance this case on the docket, order a speedy hearing at the 

earliest practicable date, cause this case to be in every way 

expedited and upon such hearing to: 

1. Grant plaintiffs and the class they represent a 

declaratory judgment that the election system com- 

plained of herein violates the First, Thirteenth, 

Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the Con- 

stitution of the United States and 42 U. S.C. Secs. 1973, 

  

He 
G 

¥ 

1 

3 

gt 

il 

ES 
{| 3b Eo 

a
 

Sh
 

ad 
20 { | 

By  



R 

= 

= y 
4 

o fi 
is 

1 Le 

hl 
as we 
> 4 

¥ y v 

n, 

£S 

is 

nd 

to 

pn 5 

to 

he ky 

ay i 
& 

hy 

&" 

3 

| 5 

    

- 
8
 

n
—
 

a 
C
A
R
E
 

S
R
E
 
o
s
 

Eh
 

y
s
 

% 
» 

RL
 
g
t
s
 

fy 
r
e
 

x 
A
R
Y
L
 

pops
 
E
S
 

  

1983 and 1985(3). 
2. Grant plaintiffs and the class they represent an order 

enjoining the defendants, their agents, successors, 

attorneys and those acting in concert with them and at 

their discretion from holding, supervising, or certifying 

the results of any election for the Mobile City 
Commission under the present at-large election system 

and from failing to adopt a plan of city government using 
‘single-member districts. 

3. Award plaintiffs and the class they represent their 

costs in this action, including an award of reasonable 
attorneys’ fees. : 

4. Grant such other and further equitable relief as the 
Court may deem just and proper. 

CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER & 
KENNEDY 

1407 DAVIS AVENUE 
MOBILE, ALABAMA 36603 

By: /s/ J. U. Blacksher 
J. U. BLACKSHER 

EDWARD STILL, ESQ. 
321 Frank Nelson Building 
Birmingham, Alabama 35203 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

<1



  

[caption omitted in printing] 

MOTION TO DISMISS 

~~ Comes now each defendant in the above-styled cause, 

jointly and severally, and moves the court to dismiss this 

cause upon the following grounds: | 

1. The complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted. 
2. Insofar as this action is against the City of Mobile and 

isbasedupon42 U.S.C. §1983, the complaint fails to state a 

claim upon which relief can be granted. 

3. Insofar as this action is based upon 42 U.S.C. §1985 

(3), the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can 

be granted. 
4. Insofar as this action is based upon 42 U.S.C. §1973, 

the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be 

granted since the complaint affirmatively shows that no 

plaintiff is among those empowered to bring enforcement 

actions under any provision of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 

other than Section 5 thereof. 
5. Insofar as this action is jurisdictionally based upon 28 

U.S.C. §1331, there is want of subject matter jurisdiction in 

this Court since it appears to a legal certainty that the claim 

of each class member is in reality for less than the requisite 

jurisdictional amount in controversy. 
6. Insofar as this action is against the City of Mobile and 

is based upon a remedy inferred from the Constitution, 

cognizable under 28 U.S.C. §1331, the complaint fails to 

state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 

7. Insofar as this action is brought under 42 U.S.C. 

§1973, the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief 

can be granted, since that statute creates no new right the 

violation of which is actionable, but instead only a new 

remedy to implement previously held rights. 

ys     
5 

: 
£ 
i 
2 3 

ai
a 
S
a
 

  

OF 

LE



ief 

    

a
A
 

E
E
A
 

/s/ Charles B. Arendall, Jr. 
Charles B. Arendall, Jr. 

30th Floor - First National Bank 

Building 

Mobile, Alabama 36602 

Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL: i 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, ~ ° 
GREAVES & JOHNSTON : 

/s/ S. R. Sheppard 
S. R. Sheppard 

Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL: 

LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE 

CITY OF MOBILE 

[Certificate omitted in printing] 

<3



  
    

: [caption omitted in printing] 

MOTION TO STRIKE 

Comes now each defendant in the above-styled cause, 
jointly and severally, and moves the Court to strike from 

Plaintiffs’ complaint the following prayers for relief: 

1. The injunctive relief prayed for in Paragraph V-2 of the 

  
b
g
p
 
da
is

! 
ic
t 

a 
io

 
2
0
 

S
P
R
 

ai
a.
 

BT 
e
r
 P
RI
 

Re 
et 
TE
 

1 
0 

1 
Ve

y 
Ba
 

i
 

ol
 

S
R
 

p
h
e
 

ba
. 

EL
 
L
a
a
t
)
 

fd
 

complaint, in which Plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendants g 

“from failing to adopt a plan of city government using single- § s 

member districts”. ¥ 

2. The demand for “an award of reasonable attorneys’ Zi 

fees”, contained in Paragraph V-3 of the complaint.     
/s/ Charles B. Arendall, Jr. 

Charles B. Arendall, Jr. 

30th Floor - First National Bank 

Building 

Mobile, Alabama 36602 

Attorney for Defendants 

ile 

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, 3 

GREAVES & JOHNSTON ® 

/s/ S. R. Sheppard & 

S. R. Sheppard : 

Attorney for Defendants 5 

OF COUNSEL: 

LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE 
CITY OF MOBILE 

[Certificate omitted in printing] 

<4   
"
™
 

"N
 

tT
 

™ 
MN

 
A
 
r
r
;
 

r
e
r
 

 



ase, 

  

  

wt
 

G
G
 fa
 

C
e
 

oT
 

Sa 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, et al., 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

Plaintiffs, 

) 
) 

) CIVILACTION 
) No. 75-297-P 
) 
) 
) 
) 
) 

CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA, 

et al., : 

Defendants. 

ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS 

The plaintiffs, black citizens of the City of Mobile, seek to 

bring this action as a class action on behalf of themselves and 

on behalf of all other black persons similarly situated, 

pursuant to Rule 23(a) and Rule 23(b)(2), Federal Rules of 

Civil Procedure. 
It is alleged that they, and all other such persons, have 

been, are being, and will be adversely affected by the 

defendants’ practices complained of, to wit, they are and 

continue to be deprived of equal protection of the laws 

because of the election at large system of the City 

Commissioners to numbered places. It is claimed this 

discriminates against black residents of Mobile in that their 

concentrated voting strength is “diluted and cancelled out by 

<O



  

the white majority.” 
The plaintiffs seek the following relief: (1) a declaratory 

judgment that the election system violates the First, 

Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the 

Constitution of the United States and 42 U.S.C. §§1973, 

1983, and 1985(3); (2) issue an order enjoining the de- 

fendants, their agents, etc. from holding, supervising, or 

certifying the results of any election for the Mobile City 

Commission under the present at-large election system, and 

from failing to adopt a plan of City government using single 

member districts: (3) award the plaintiffs costs and a 

‘reasonable attorney’s fee; (4) grant such other and further 

equitable relief as the court may deem just and proper. 

Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 

1343. 
The motion to dismiss the City of Mobile as a party 

defendant answerable under Section 1983 is well taken and 

should be granted. It is clear that a municipal corporation is 

not a “person” within the meaning of 42 U.S.C. §1983, City 

of Kenosha v. Bruno, 412 U.S. 507 (1973), 37 L.Ed.2d 

109, 93 S. Ct. 2222; Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), 

5 L.LEd.2d 492, 81 S. Ct. 473. 
The motion to dismiss the City of Mobile under § 1985(3) 

is due to be granted. The City of Mobile is not a “person” 

within the meaning of that section. Bosely v. City of Euclid, 

496 F.2d 193 (6th Cir. 1974); Mack v. Lewis, 298 F. Supp. 

1351 (D.C. Ga. 1969). 

Furthermore, a claim against any defendant is not stated 

pursuant to that section. 

In Westberry v. Gilman Paper Co., 507 F.2d 206, 214 

(1975), the Fifth Circuit summarized a 1985(3) cause of 

action as follows: 

26   
  

BS 
G
w
e



      

R
T
 

S
e
 

S
R
E
 
r
a
 

Se
 
S
E
 

B
E
 

a
 

aa
d 

oJ 
F
a
n
 
T
R
 

E
m
 

Be 
A
S
 
S
a
 

i 
p
a
 

4 
Be

, 
ae

 
Ta

 
S
H
S
 

S
R
 

Se
 

T
e
 

R
E
S
I
S
 

F
i
o
n
a
 

iy 
H
R
S
 

A
L
E
C
 

SE
 

a 
Set 

A
 

0 
e
r
 

A 
Bi
e 

3 
v
y
 
L
P
 

F
a
r
a
 

hat 
dal 

3 
C
o
 

S
R
 

t 
" 

4 
: 

ee
 

7
 
R
A
 

SE 
ERE 
Y
r
 

ox
 
a
3
 

A
 

A 
e
S
 

Ra 
» 

R
e
a
 

a
 
r
s
 

¥ 
i
n
 

" 
N
a
.
 

ol 

“This requires that the complaint show that there was a 
conspiracy; that such a conspiracy be for the purpose of 
depriving an individual of the equal protection of the 
laws; that the co-conspirators acted in furtherance of 
their conspiracy, and that the plaintiff was injured in his 
person or property or actually deprived of a citizen’s 
right or privilege. Second, as the Supreme Court noted 
in Griffin: [T]he language of [of 1985(3)] requiring 

intent to deprive of equal protection or equal privileges, 
and immunities means that there must be some racial or 
perhaps otherwise class based invidiously discrimina- 
tory animus behind the conspirators’ action.”! 

Plaintiffs have not set out sufficient allegations of a 

conspiracy to meet this test. They only alleged that the 

election system discriminates against them. [Complaint I'V- 

E] Therefore, insofar as the action is based on 42 U.S.C. 

§1985(3), the complaint fails to state a cause of action and 

the motion to dismiss this cause of action as to all defendants 

in the complaint is well taken and is GRANTED. 

The defendants’ motion to dismiss the cause of acti~n 

under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. §1973 is 
not well taken and the motion is DENIED as to all 

defendants.? 

Therefore, under 28 U.S.C. §1343(4), this court has 

jurisdiction of all defendants including the City of Mobile as 

to this cause of action. 
Since this court has jurisdiction under §1343(4), it is 

‘unnecessary to discuss the jurisdictional issue under 28 

See Griffin v. Breckenridge, 403 U.S. 88. 

See the amendment to the Act approved August 6, 1975: “Section 
401. Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amended by striking 
out ‘Attorney General’ the first three times it appears and inserting in lieu 

thereof the following ‘ Attorney General or an aggrieved person.” U. S. 
Code Congressional and Administrative News, P.L. 94-73, 89 Stat. 
404. 

27



  

  

U.S.C. §1331.2 Therefore, motion of defendants as to the 

cause of action under §1973 and the attack of the juris- 

diction as to §1343(4) is not well taken and is hereby 
DENIED. 

The defendants’ motion to strike attorneys’ fees and the 

injunctive relief prayed for in paragraph V-2 is DENIED. * 
Done, this the 18th day of November, 1975. 

/s/ Virgil Pittman 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

JUDGE 

¥The complaint alleges an amount in controversy of $10,000 or more, 
but briefs claim the jurisdictional amount is based on a $10,000 loss to 
defendants rather than to the plaintiffs. For a good discussion of the right 
to proceed under §1331 with less than the $10,000 jurisdictional 
amount, see Cortright v. Resor, 325 F. Supp. 797 (D.C. N.Y. 1971) atp. 

808. The case was reversed for other reasons. : 

‘See the amendment to the Act approved August 6, 1975. “Section 

402. Section 14 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is amended by adding at 
the end thereof the following new subsection: (e) In any .action or 
proceeding to enforce the guarantees of the fourteenth or fifteenth 
amendment, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, 
other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of these 

costs.” Supra, footnote 2. 

<8 
fo 

Fe
it
h 

% 
SE

 
g
y
   

SE
 
a
a
 

#
0
 

  

W 
W
H
E
T
 
B
S
 

S
e
 

i
e
 

F
E
T
T
 

4 

  

INT 
FOR’ 

WILE® 
‘et, al, 

vs. 

CITY 
et. al,



the 

mris- 

=by 

the 

D4 

ore, 

3 to 

ght 

nal 

tp. 

jon 

3 at 

or 

1th 

ty, 
>S¢ 

  

  

p
l
i
 

N 
2 

A
e
 

I
 

a
y
 

S
H
 

nr
 

- 
. 

a
 

1s 
AE
 
R
R
 

T
E
P
 

© 
Lg 

a
e
s
 

; 
i 

OP 
g
e
 

RG 
ie
 

0 
f
t
 

CE 
E
e
 
e
h
 

nt
 

- 
- 

 
—
—
—
—
—
—
 

Si 
S
i
s
 

o
i
 
i
s
 
d
r
 
a
 

Q 
i
g
i
 

yp
 
R
R
 
R
E
G
I
S
,
 

2 
{ 

an
 
E
n
 
0
d
 

S
g
 
S
P
 

le
 

To
n 

R
A
R
E
 

e
h
 

y 
os 

BEG 
ye 

a
 

OE 
B
e
r
 

ol 
F
R
I
C
K
E
 

SW
 

cpr
 

Sn
 

2 
a 

o
A
 

RY
 

he 
R
E
T
R
 

Ly
 
As

 
L
S
 

RA
 

e
r
e
 

1
G
 

W 
25
% 

s
i
n
 

a
c
 

Al
 o
R
 

S
E
 

Sr
 

F
R
E
T
 

SE
 

de 
WS

 
A
e
n
 

BE
 

ay
 

Ale
 

Ly 
"oh

 
y
a
.
 

Ph
 

Sr 
Rk
 

gh 
Lo
 

G
h
 

A
T
E
 
h
o
 
T
E
 

L
r
 

3 
: 
o
a
 

i
e
 

t
a
n
 

ih 
B
w
 

p
i
a
l
 

wo
 

Ya
d 

LT 
CELE 

ER 
2 

pn
 

Ca
it

 
R
T
 
a
 

I 
Cad 

E
d
 

ge
 
e
r
 

Hy:
 

- 
2 

Sa
 

o
F
 
R
A
 

A 
V
A
R
 

po
t 

Ar
 

Ne 
rg 

pe
 

R
U
E
 

N
t
 

G
R
P
 

i 
chs 

: 
wd

 
r
o
a
 

oo
 

PR 
HP

 
fait

: 
SB 

RSE
 

I 
0
,
 

og 
T
a
 

be A
I
N
E
 

E
e
 

SL
 
R
E
 
H
B
R
 

A
R
R
 

e
s
 

‘et. al. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 
SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, : CIVILACTION NO: 
715-297-P 

Plaintiffs, 

vs. 

. CITY OF MOBILE, 
et. al, 

Defendants. 

ANSWER 

~ Come now the defendants, the City of Mobile, Alabama, 

and Gary A. Greenough, Robert B. Doyle, Jr., and Lambert 

C. Mims, individually and in their official capacities as 

Mobile City Commissioners, and, in answer to the named 

plaintiffs’ complaint, say: . 

FIRST DEFENSE 

IL Jurisdiction 

Defendants admit that this Court has subject matter 

jurisdiction of this cause insofar as it is a claim against the 

<9 ;



3 

i 

  

T
R
 

F
T
E
 

i
 

% 
I 

ks
 

gi 
oy 

2 
Eg 

C
R
 

  

  

said commissioners under 42 U.S.C. §1983, juris- 
dictionally premised upon 28 U.S.C. §1343. In all other 

respects the allegations of Section I of the complaint are 

denied. 

II. Class Action 

1. Defendants admit that the named plaintiffs purport to 
represent a class composed of all black citizens of the City of 

Mobile, but deny that this action may properly be maintained 

as a class action on behalf of such persons. 

2. Defendants deny that blacks as such are adversely 

affected by any practices of defendants. 

3. Defendants deny that blacks are, or continue to be, 

deprived of the equal protection of the law in the City of 

Mobile. 
4. Defendants admit that the joinder of all members of the 

purported class would be impracticable. 

5. Defendants deny that the named plaintiffs may 

properly represent all black citizens of the City of Mobile. 

Defendants say, on the contrary, that the political ideas of 

the named plaintiffs with respect to the issue in this case are 
not shared by all blacks in the community; that there is 

disparity among black citizens, as there is among white 

citizens, with respect to the form of city government which is 

desired. 
6. Defendants deny that they have acted or refused to act 

on grounds generally applicable to the purported class. 

7. Defendants deny that injunctive or declaratory relief 

with respect to the purported class is proper. 

8. Except as herein expressly admitted, defendants deny 

all allegations of Section II of the complaint. 

30 

  

  

  
  

subst 

resids 

2 

all al 

Y



juris- 

| other 

int are 

port to 

City of 

itained 

rersely 

to be, 

_ity of 

5 of the 

5 may 

fobile. 

leas of 

ase are 

here is 

~ white 

hich is 

1to act 

SS. 

y relief 

s deny 

  

  

  

III. Parties 

Defendants admit the allegations of Section III of the 

complaint. 

2 IV. Nature of Claim 

~. 1. Defendants admit that the Mobile City Commission is 

the governing body of the City of Mobile by virtue of, but 

. only to the extent allowed by, statutes enacted from time to 

time by the Legislature of the State of Alabama. Pursuant to 

_ "such statutes, the commission performs certain executive 

and administrative functions and holds limited legislative 

powers. Plenary legislative authority over the affairs of the 

city is vested in the Legislature of the State of Alabama. The 

three city commissioners are elected at large to numbered 

places, each of which has different legally specified func- 

tions. Certain sections of the city are predominantly white 

. and others are predominantly black, but such sections are 

scattered over the city and there is no geographical area of 

substantial size in which both whites and blacks do not 

reside. 

2. Except as herein expressly admitted, defendants deny 

all allegations of Section IV of the complaint. 

'V. Relief 

Defendants deny the allegations of Section V of the 

complaint and deny that the relief sought by the named 

plaintiffs is necessary or proper.



  

SECOND DEFENSE 

All aspects of the government of the City of Mobile are 
subject to determination by the Legislature of the State of 

Alabama. In the exercise of its discretion, the Legislature has 

provided that the city have a City Commission form of 
government, as distinguished from a Mayor-Council or 

Mayor-Aldermen or City Manager form, and has specified 

the number of commissioners and the method to be used in 

electing them. Under our federal constitutional system, the 

~ determination of such matters is committed to state gov- 

ernment and its components for resolution. The system 

chosen by the Legislature does not unconstitutionally de- 

prive any of the many identifiable segments of the 

community from equal access to the electoral process, or 

discriminate for or against any such segment, and the 

continued existence of such system should be permitted by 

the judicial branch of the United States government. 

THIRD DEFENSE 

The choice of the form of city government is a political 

issue committed under our federal system to the states for 

resolution and, in the case of the City of Mobile, the issue has 

been resolved by the Legislature of the State of Alabama in 

favor of a City Commission form of government elected at 

large. If the named plaintiffs, or any other black citizens of 

the City, desire to change Mobile’s form of government, they 

should seek appropriate action by the Legislature, which has 

authority over such matters and in which blacks from Mobile 

are currently serving as elected members. 

3< 

  

  
   



obile are 

State of 

ature has 

form of 

uncil or 

specified 

= used in 

tem, the 

ate gov- 

system 

pally de- 

of the 

’Cess, or 

and the 

pitted by 

nt. 

political 

ates for 

ssue has 

bama in 

ected at 

izens of 

nt, they 

1ich has 

Mobile 

  

    
    

FOURTH DEFENSE 

The relief sought by plaintiffs in this cause ought not to be 

granted because it would effect a deprivation of due process 

“and equal protection of law, since if each commissioner were 

required to be elected from a single-member district, without 

‘a change in the statutory duties of the respective city 

commissioners, each commissioner, managing a particular 

i ' function of city government (e.g., finance), would be directly 

. responsible only to one of three geographical districts of the 

. city. The result would be that the remaining portions of the 

- city would have no vote at all either for or against such 

. commissioner, who would execute policies of government 

. without responsibility to two-thirds of those governed. 

FIFTH DEFENSE 

The relief sought by plaintiffs in this cause ought not to be 

‘granted because, in order for any court-ordered single- 

. member district plan to be imposed that would avoid the 

existence of a city government without electoral responsi- 

bility and consequent deprivation of due process and equal 

protection of law, it would be necessary to change the form of 

city government validly enacted by the Legislature of 

| Alabama from a city commission form to some other form of 

' government. The choice of a form of city government is a 

| function which our federal constitution entrusts to state 

government and its components, and the imposition of a 

. different form of city government by a United States Court 

‘would violate established constitutional principles of comity 

“and federalism. 

33



/s/ C.B. Arendall, Jr. 
C.B. Arendall, Jr. 

- 30th Floor, First National Bank 

Bldg. 

Mobile, Alabama 36602 

Attorney for Defendants 

OF COUNSEL: 

HAND, ARENDALL, BEDSOLE, 
GREAVES & JOHNSTON 

/s/ S.R. Sheppard 
S.R. Sheppard 

OF COUNSEL: 

"LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF 
THE CITY OF MOBILE 

  [Certificate omitted in printing] 

34 

         



      

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA 

SOUTHERN DIVISION 

WILEY L. BOLDEN, ET AL, : 

Plaintiffs, 

Vs. + CIVIL ACTION 

= NO. 75-297 P 

or +. CITY OF MOBILE, 

5. ~ ALABAMA,ET AL, 

Defendants. 

ORDER 

The plaintiffs have filed a motion for an order certifying 

that they may maintain this action as a class action under 

Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

The Court having considered the motion, oral argument 

and briefs of the parties certifies that the plaintiffs may 

maintain this action as a class action. 

~The plaintiff class for the purposes of injunctive relief 

~ under Rule 23(b)(2) F.R. Civ.P. is defined by the Court as 

. all black persons who are now citizens of the City of Mobile, 

- Alabama. : 

The Court finds that this class action complies with the 

requirements of Rule 23(a) and (b)(2) F.R.Civ.P. and that 

the named plaintiffs have the standing to raise the issues for 

35 

 



      

    
    

the purpose of injunctive relief. 
DONE at Mobil: i 1 pH e, Alabama, this 19th day of January, 

/s/ Virgil Pittman 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

36 

  

The Un 

of this law 

. | in this cc 

   

  
a 
—
—
—
—
—
—
 

: conclusio 

i Itis Ol 
pursuant 
.1978, wi 
| election 
granted re 

lis hereby 

. States St 

| Done, 

  

   



nuary, 

IDGE 

  

[caption omitted in printing] 

ORDER    2 The United States Supreme Court having granted review 

i | of this lawsuit on October 2, 1978, and for the reasons stated 

£ | in this court’s Order of April 7, 1977 (the findings and 

& conclusions of which are incorporated herein by reference), 

g | tis ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that 

© | pursuant to the last paragraph of this court’s order of May 31, 

2 .1978, which provided for a stay of the mayor-council 

5% election ordered therein in the event the Supreme Court 

+ granted review, the election ordered for November 21, 1 978, 

5 lis hereby STAYED pending further orders of the United 

. States Supreme Court. 

€ . Done, this the 3rd day of October, 1978. 

/s/ Virgil Pittman 

Virgil Pittman 

by W.B. Hand per instruction 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT 

JUDGE 

'U. S. DISTRICT COURT 

SOU. DIST. ALA. 

FILED AND ENTERED THIS THE 

3rd DAY OF OCTOBER 197 8 

MINUTE ENTRY NO. 

WILLIAM J. O'CONNOR, CLERK 

BY- 
Deputy Clerk 

37      



  
  

  

  

  

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 
OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20543 

October 16, 1978 

J. U. Blacksher, Esquire 

1407 Davis Avenue 

Mobile, Alabama 36603 

RE: City of Mobile, Alabama, et al v. 

Wiley L. Bolden, et al., No. 77-1844 

(A-315) 

Dear Sir: 

The Court today entered the following order in the above- 

entitled case: 

“The application of appellees to vacate the order 
issued by the United States District Court for the 
Southern District of Alabama on October 3, 1978, 
presented to Mr. Justice Powell and by him referred to 
the Court, is denied.” : 

Very truly yours, 

MICHAEL RODAK, JR., Clerk 

by 
Francis J. Lorson 
Deputy Clerk 

38 
[ce: list omitted] 

    

i 
R
e
 

i 
a
y
 

t
s
 

O
E
 

h
i
 

§ 
B
T
 

p
t
 

{ 
a
 

A 

= 
S
E
G
 
S
H
E
 

Bp
 

i 
¢ 
S
r
 
S
R
C
 

BE
 A
TR
 

EE 
LI
AR
 

R
E
 

i
e
 

So
 
=
 

a
]
 

o
R
 

a 
2%
 

      

4 
o
e
 he

 
i 
G
n
 

an
e 

EP 
a
 

  

¥ 

6   
 



r. 
2eds 

{2 
RR 

TOW 
Re 

Ly 
A
E
 
J
D
 

G
y
 

GE 
p
a
 

A
A
S
 
T
T
 

SC 
SIO 

lie 
7 

O
r
 
s
d
 

B
e
m
 
S
a
 

St 
E
e
 

i 
Se e
T
 

S
B
 

GER 
S
a
t
 

     
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

TES 

844 

above- 

rder 
the 

78, 

Clerk



—t 15   

  

  
  

  

blacks were disinfranchised before 1950. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

All right, sir. There is some question in this 

case whether there was any discriminatory racial motive 

behind the 1911 Act. 

THE COURT: 

All right. Go ahead, Mr. Blacksher. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

We call Dr. McLaurin. 

DR. MELTON McLAURIN 
  

the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and 

after having first been duly sworn to tell®the truth, the 

whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and 

testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q - May it please the Court, this is Dr. Melton A. 

McLaurin. Dr. McLaurin was born July 11, 1941. His place   
of birth was Fayetteville, North Carolina. His present | 

address is 808 Deerfield Court, Mobile. He is married. | 

His formal education includes a Bachelor's Degree 

        
  

  

  
  

  

  
  

and I 

Mobile 

witnes 

have m 

be qua 

Histor 

THE CO 

     



18 
  

and I have taught non-credit courses in the history of 

Mobile. Those are the basic courses that I teach.     
e
a
l
 

a
l
 

2 
: 
f
g
 
i
 

5
 

A 
: 

la
y 

| 
T
e
 

  

     

  

  

his ¢ Q Where did you teach these non-credit courses on 

ve the history of Mobile? 

& A At the University of South Alabama continuing 

3 ; education division. 

i | Q Have you ever testified in Court as an expert 

5 witness, Dr. McLaurin? 

3 A No, I haven't. 

of 
E Q Have you ever testified as a witness in any role 

8 in Court? 

ffs, and A No. I haven't. 

the MR. BLACKSHER: 

d and Your Honor, on the basis of the testimony of the 

! witness and the evidence in his curriculum vitae, which we   have not completely summarized, we move that Dr. McLaurin 

i be qualified as an expert witness in the field of Southern 

History, generally, and in the history of Mobile, Alabama? 

THE COURT: 

All right. Go ahead.   place   
MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q Dr. McLaurin, what was the beginning of black 

A political activity in Mobile, Alabama? 
pgree 

iI A Blacks became politically active in Mobile with 
-   
        Js Al :   de

 

fe
rm

en
 

ns 
s
e
n
 

B
L
A
 
S
O
N
 

 



  

  
  

  
      

    

the beginning of radical reconstruction in the spring of 1867 

and that was the beginning of their political activity. 

Q How did they become active? 

MR. ARENDALL : 

Objection, irrelevant. 

THE COURT: 

I will let him show it: Overruled. 

A They became politically active in almost all areas. 

They held a convention immediately after the passage of 

the Reconstruction Acts and gathered themselves together 

to decide what activities to engage in. From that point 

forward, which was in May of '67, and were active in almost 

all fields of political endeavor. 

Q ; What about black citizens in Mobile, particularly? 

Were they any more active? 

A Well, Mobile was the major urban center in the 

State and blacks congregated here at the end of the war and 

held sort of a black political convention here -- not at the 

end of the war, but at the beginning of radical recomstruc- 

tion, yes. In a way, Mobile was a center for black political 

activity. 

Q Were black Mobilians active in any way in forming 

policy? 

A Blacks were represented at the convention in 1867 

  

 
p
—
e
—
i
e
a
e
—
 

|       
fs 74 

  
to
a 

  

1-19 

A
T
 

5 
hl
 
a
r
y
 

Ia 
EA
 

    
    
   



  

      
    

  

  

19 > ad vr MEET E ’ 

¢ which wrote the constitution in 1868 and actively partici- 
of 1867 ¢ 

& pated in that convention. 
Vo 5 % 

% Q Do you recall the names of those black delegates? 

: THE COURT: 

& Is that detail necessary? You know, you are going 

i over something that is generally knowledgeable. It is all 

% right to build your pattern, but cut down on some of it unless 

¥ the name has some particular significance. 
areas. 5 

iF MR. BLACKSHER: 
o f % 

a We will move along, your Honor. 
her gr 

tne x Q I don't want to say it was generally knowledgeable. 
in is. 

pr Most of it was new to me. 
almost & 

= THE COURT: 

| Well, go ahead. 
larly? Be 

E MR. BLACKSHER: 

h 3 | Q What about from the period 1868 or 1867 forward, 
he 3 

¥ were blacks politically active in Mobile then? 
rar and | 3 

A Blacks were active in Mobile politics and in the 
at the) = 

| : State, in general, up until 1901 and they were active 
ystruc- id 

3 throughout that period. 
»olitical ; 2 P 

g Q What was the effect of the 1893 Sayer election law, 

; and what was that? 
yrming 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Objection, irrelevant. 
n 1867 3 

Seri pe = agery Sits       
 



  

  

  

    

THE COURT: 

I will let him testify. 

A The Sayer election law was introduced primarily 

conservative elements of the Democratic party in an by the 

intent to cut down on the populist vote. It was a direct 

result 

and it was an effort to disinfranchise voters in lower 

socio-economic groups, including blacks, to some extent. 

Q Did the Sayer law disinfranchise all black 

voters? 

A No. 

Q You say up until 1901. Would you describe what 

happened then? 

A Nineteen hundred and one, the new constitution 

was adopted and one of the major purposes was for -- for its 

adoption was disinfranchisement of black voters. That was 

primarily it. And with the adoption of that constitution, 

blacks were effectively moved from the political process 

from the State of Alabama and the City of Mobile. 

Q Was black disinfranchisement the principal purpose 

of the 1901 Alabama Constitution? 

A I would say black disinfranchisement was the 

in principal purpose for the constitutional convention and, 

it was the major way in which the 

LILY : 

addition to that, 

  
        44 

roe—————— 

of a challenge to the Democratic party by the populist 

2 

  

mr) 

i 

  
  

S
e
 
S
E
R
 

TR
 

oF,
 

  

    
% 
M
Z
 

3 

  

1 disinfr 

primar] 

suprema 

to the 

tution 

Q 

wanting 

A 

from tt 

causes 

to disi 

removir 

movemer 

movemer 

patterr 

sought 

black B



  

  

‘“disinfranchisement was sold. 

The idea that the convention was going to be held 

primarily to disinfranchise blacks and to guarantee white 

a
i
e
 
S
T
E
R
N
E
R
 

Y
e
e
 

supremacy was the way the calling of the convention was sold 

R
E
 

Ud
 

0 (2
3 HH
 to the public and it was the way the product of the consti- 

% 
% 

5 
“ 
Fh 

tution was sold to the public. 

Q What were the reasons for the politicians then 

  

=. £ wanting to disinfranchise black voters? 

A The movement probably gained its largest impact 

from the idea that black votes were corrupt and blacks 

causes corruption in the political activity and, therefore,         a t ' to disinfranchise blacks would be a political reform by   removing corruption from politics. 

Now, that is the reason that is generally stated. 

There are other motives involved. 

Q What was the so called reform movement that was 

  

going on, at that time? 

A Well, this is generally called the progressive 

y=
 

[eo
] 

-
 

S
R
A
 

a
d
n
 

"2
 

st 
Ts

 
r
—
 

ge
n 

r.: 
sya 

(
E
R
C
 

R
I
E
S
 
P
T
I
 
R
A
Y
 

N 
NE

 
S
a
a
s
 

a
R
 
S
E
R
R
E
 

Te
ng

 
ae 

NE 
ET 

rT
 

I 
T
N
 

on 
Bn 
Co
e 

vn 
Cr

 
ek
 

AR
AB
 
L
I
A
R
 

[Sn 
w 

e
—
 movement by historians and in the south the progressive 

   
“pose | movement included disinfranchisement because the black voting 

patterns were shown as corrupting patterns. Various whites 

sought the black vote.   
y, in] As a matter of fact, it would be manipulated in the | 

, black belt counties to assure this passage. 

3 45 
J 

  

  
    
 



  
  

        

  

Q Was disinfranchisement, as carried out through the 

1901 constitution, resisted by black citizens? 

A Oh, yes. 

Q What about black Mobilians? 

A Oh, yes. Black Mobilians, as a matter of fact, 

took the lead, they and blacks in Birmingham, in resisting 

disinfranchisement. 

Q What were the devices employed by the 1901 consti- 

tution to disinfranchise blacks? 

A There were a number of them. The basic one was 

literacy and property qualifications, residential qualifi- 

cations, but the literacy requirement was the basic one. 

Q What involvement in the 1901 constitutional conven- 

tion was there by white Mobile politicians? 

A Well, I think one can say, by and large, the 

progressive community in Mobile was considered, at that 

time by historians, was to be in the progressive democratic 

camp, which was quite active. The register, for example, 

was one of the leading newspapers calling for a constitu- 

tional convention. Several prominent politicians who would 

be considered progressives either supported the convention 

or participated in it. 

jd 3 

  

Q Who were the delegates from Mobile to that convention? 

A Well, the delegates to the convention were Harry 

  

ari ft her ee 

Fe 

  
o.
oo
 

Lo
rd
e 

co
 

EE
 
S
E
A
 

Ee 
e
e
 

—
—
 
P
E
 

2 
Ch 

4A
 

28 
:§ 

o
t
 

RvR
 

Ss 
A
T
E
N
E
O
 

i 

    
  

  

  
  

Pilisns 8 

that come 

Q 

of the bl] 

A 

Q 

originate 

a member 

A 

attitude 

was a ref 

Q 

commissic 

A 

progress: 

governmes 

business 

advocate= 

considers 

reasons, 

governmem 

movement 

adopted - 

  

B
y
  



—q 2} 

  
=onsti- 

ne. 

conven- | 

| 
| 

at 

cratic 

ple, 

itu- 

would 

ntion 

onvention” 

larTy 

  

    

24 
  

{| movement in the United States. Many other cities had already 

adopted the commission form of government, both nationally   

Pilians and a gentleman namad Brooks, I belisve, are ths two 

that come to mind. 

Q Did these Mobilians support the disinfranchisement 

of the black voters? 

A Yes. 

Q Do you have with you correspondence that was 

originated by Mr. Harry Pillans concerning his intention as 

a member of the 1901 constitutional convention? 

A Yes. And I think generally they show a progressive 

attitude toward disinfranchisement; that is, disinfranchisement 

was a reform, a part of the general reform movement. 

Q What brought about the adoption of the current 

commission form of city government in 19117? 

A Well, I would say it was again considered a 

progressive reform. The idea of having a more efficient 

government, and particularly a government that was more 

business like and one that was less amenable to what the 

advocates of the commission form of government would have 

considered political corruption. These were the basic 

reasons, I think, for the support for the commission form of 

government. 

It was also a part of the general progressive 

  

f
i
f
i
 

a
 

i
 
C
E
A
 

E
e
   

w
s
 

2: 54 oi    



  

    

  

and in Alabama. 

Q Was racial discrimination, per se, a motivating 

factor in the passage of Act 281 of 1911 which created the 

Mobile City Commission? 

A I would say that racial considerations, per se, were 

not a part of the motivation, for two reasons; the basic one 

being that the blacks had already been disinfranchised by the 

1901 constitution and its effect upon the blacks of the State 

and of Mobile and -- but I think it is also true that the 

proponents of the commission form of government were very 

much aware of the impact of the changes in the electoral 

process and this is one of the things they wanted. They 

wanted to get away from what they considered ward politics and 

they would have been aware that such a movement would have 

diminished the impact of amy voting by blacks in Mobile if 

there had been such voting in the future, but I do not see 

race, per se, as a reason for the 1911 City Commission. I 

would have to say no to that question. 

Q What specific connection do you see between the 1901 

constitutional convention and Act 281 in 1911? 

A Well, the most obvious connection is that blacks in 

Mobile were totally unable to register any opinion, any voice 

in the development of the form of government, which was 

adopted in 1911, and continues to exist. That is the most 
\ 

          I x 
—   

  

  

obvious | 

Commissi 

reform p 

south in 

general 

a part o: 

connectit 

Q 

A 

supporte« 

supportec 

of pes1so: 

very gooc 

constitu 

A 

conventic 

supported 

Commissio     Q 

[riont aft 
  

R
T
 

S
U
 

CR 
T
H
,
 
&
 
R
E
   ji



d the 

se, were 

sic one 

d by the 

he State 

the 

very 

ral 

hey 

itics and 

have 

le if 

t see 

nN. <1 

the 1901 

acks in 

ny voice 

as 

mr————————   

E
R
R
 

B
R
 

  
aN
 

on
 

  

obvious connection. 

The other connection would be this idea of the 

Commission form of government being a part of the general 

reform package, so to speak, in that in Alabama and in the 

south in general, at that time, and the connection between 

general reform and the idea of eliminating the franchise as 

a part of that general reform, those are the two possible 

connections. 

Q What about in terms of black politicians? 

A Well, many of the progressive politicians who had 

supported the constitution of 1901 here in Mobile also 

supported the Commission form of government. 

of personal connection and Mr. Pillans would be, again, a 

very good example, since he was both a delegate; at ‘the 1901   
| constitution and was a member of the first City Commission. 

lo What about the last mayor? 
| 
| A Well, Mr. Lyons's position? 

| Q That was Pat Lyons? 

| A Yes. He was favorable to the 1901 constitutional 
| 

convention and he also would have, after some thoughts, 

| supported the 1911 movement and did serve on the first 

Commission as well. 

  Q What black political activity was there in Mobile 

| 
| right after 19117   

It was that kind 

  

    2% 3   
 



  

  

A None, approximately none. And, of course, that would 

be true, too, earlier, until you get way up until -- the modern 

| period, the second World War. 

Q When did black political activity again become 

significant in Mobile? 

A Political activity, per se, not until after the 

decision in Smith versus Alright, which allowed blacks to taka 

part in white primaries, what has been previously been all 

white primaries. 1944 would be the date. 

Q The Clerk is handing you 4 document which has been 

marked as Plaintiffs' Exhibit number 2. 

Would you identify that, please? 

A Yes. That is an article by myself. 

Q Would you read the title of the article? 

A Mobile Blacks and World War II: The Development   
of a Political Consciousness. 

Q Would you briefly tell the Court the subject of that 

larticle? 

A Well, I think it would be fair to say that the article 

simply recounts the beginning of political activity by blacks 

lin Mobile as a result of the second World War, the impact of 

returning veterans, black veterans, who had fought in the 

second World War and the ideas of equality and so forth and 

determined to obtain them in their home town when they came back   
          ~% mx     

  

  

    

c
a
r
s
 

yg
 

hk 
ps
 

tik
i 

Ph
i 

a
i
 

« 
wo
 

io
w SE
 

i 

   

  
  

in tryin, 

denied, : 

Departme: 

Democrat 

led by | 

Democrat 

legislat 

challeng 

case whi 

which wa 

unconsti 

Q 

A 

Historie= 

Q 

would 1i 

a regist 

A 

time, we= 

   



  

  
  

    
  
  

A Se Je I : ed ; es 28 

at would # in trying to get the right to vote in 1944, which they were 

he modern i denied, and their appeals to the Democratic party and the 

: Department of Justice and, finally, the opening up of the 

" : Democratic party to black participation and then white efforts 

3 led by Gessner McCorvey, who was chairman of the State 

he 1 Democratic Executive Committee and others to introduce 

to take 1 legislative methods of suppressing black votes and then black 

all i challenges to that, particularly the Davis versus Schnell 

§ case which led to the declaration that the Boswell amendment, 

been B. which was the disinfranchisement amendment was declared 

Snconstiturional. That is briefly what the article covers. 

1Q Does it mention Mr. Langan's arrival on the scene 

as a friend of black interests? 

A Yes, sir. It does. Mr. Joseph Langan. 

Bent i Q And the article ends off at what point in time? 

| It ends in 1950 with the legislative races of 1950. | 
; 

>f that | IQ Where was that article published, Dr. McLaurin? | 

A It was published in the proceedings of the Gulf Const 

re article Histories and Humanities Conference, 1973. | 

blacks Q There is one set of figures in that article that I | 

act of | would like for you to call to the Court's attention. There is 

the a registration figure, I believe, for the year of 1946? 

h and A That is correct. The registration figures, at that 

came back | time, were two hundred and seventy-five registered blacks and 

Tay 

= 9X         
 



  

    

  

  

  

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q How many people were on the aldermanic council 

unit that governed Mobile, at that time? 

I would have A I could not give you an exact figure. 

to try to total up the wards and multiply. 

Q A mere approximation? 

A Approximately sixteen to eighteen. 

i Q Now, I will ask you whether or not a study of the 

newspaper articles of that time and the quotations of the 

comments made by persons such as Mayor Pat J. Lyons demonstrat 

that the change to the City Commission form was sold on the 

basis of business and other considerations completely unrelate 

to race? 

CA I would agree that the basic approach in the campaigr 

to change the form of government of the City of Mobile would 

be an appeal to what would be called progressive economic 

motivation, the idea of moving to a more business like form 

"of government. 

0 And this movement, in Mobile, had its counter part 

all over the United States, at that time, did it not? 

| A And before that time. 

Q In areas where there were no blacks or substantially 

none? 

A \ Yes. That would be true. 

8S 

bd 

| 

        
S52   

36. 

    
ol

 
4 

  

f: 

motivatec 

A 

MR. ARENI   

AE
 
O
R
E
 
T
E
A
S
E
 ' purposes 

A 

purpose 

blacks a 

{eintre 

constitu 

lievery on 
} 

|year. 
      

i
 
t
e



  ERA A iy 37 

Q Desmoines, that is one? 

A A Yes. 

Q Dayton, that is another? 

i have A Yes. 

Q And it was not, in these other places, either, 

motivated by racial considerations, was it? 

A No. 

the MR. ARENDALL: 

“he No further questions. 

onstrates   
REDIRECT EXAMINATION 
      

    
  

      
x the | 

mrelatdd | BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

lq Dr. McLaurin, I believe you said that one of the 

-ampaign La | meaningful factors of the 1901 constitutional convention was | 

would EF vo disinfranchise poor whites. 

ic i Are you saying that that was one of the primary 

form 4 purposes of that constitution? 

| ! A No. I am not saying that. I am saying the primary 

part ¥ purpose of the constitutional convention was to disinfranchise 

§ blacks and that, as a secondary purpose, there was a move to 

Fo 'disinfranchise poor whites and there were members of the 

tially ¢ constitutional convention who would have disinfranchised 

3 jevery ons who didn't make at least fifty thousand dollars a 

ey 

ie ; 53     

p
o
n
 
i
   
 



  

  

  

  

  

      
                  

  

  

  

      

91 
| 

| 
| Whom will you have next? 

| MR. BLACKSHER: of the f 

Dr. Cort Schlichting. de-annes 

; % 

DR. CORT B. SCHLICHTING Q 

the witness, having first been duly sworn to tell method 1 

the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the dat: 

the stand and testified as follows: 3 

Q 

DIRECT EXAMINATION thas wes 
mean inc 

| BY MR. STILL: : each rac 

| 0 May it please the Court, this is Cort Burk of each 

Schlichting. He is thirty-four years of age. He now lives is your 

: at 301 Vanderbilt Drive in the City of Mobile. : on the = 

| He is married. Education includes a PHD from A 

| L.S.U. He has lived in Mobile County for the last five years$ § statist: 

| and he is now employed as a professor of economics; is that : an stat 

correct? 4 exter ir 

| A Associate. : data as 

Q Associate professor of economics at Springhill ; possible 

College. I would ask the Clerk to hand Dr. Schlichting t 2 

| Exhibit number 8. 3 regresss 

| Would you look at Exhibit 8, please, dottor, and A 

eb er of 

     



tell 

, took 

= lives 

m 

ve year 

8 that 

and 

  

  
  

R
R
 

S
e
 

Th 
vd 

ji
 

T
R
E
Y
 

E
A
C
 

i
g
 

L
k
 

  

    

SE
 

G
E
E
 

R
I
 
R
E
S
 

  

E
R
 

E
R
E
 

e
e
 

E
p
 

ee
 

% 
: 

y 
4 

F
i
g
 
t
i
n
 

oe 
a
 

Sl
 

C
L
 

    101 
  

pid you talk with Mr. Parker about the inclusion 

of the two small areas that were periodically annexed and 

de-annexed? 

A Very briefly, yes. We had to face that problem. 

Q All right. Now, did you talk with them about what 

method to use or what method he was going to use to handle 

the data regarding those two small areas? 

A Yes. 

Q Now, considering the annexation, the synthetic wards 

that were done the way in which Mr. Parker computed the 

mean income computation and the use of the percentage of 

each race over the age of eighteen, rather than the percentage   
of each race which were actually registered to vote, what 

45 your opinion as to the possible negative effect this had 

on the validity of the data? 

A I felt that we did the best possible job we could do 

statistically to obtain the most accurate data we could get.   
|All statisticians, all statistical data is going to have some 

lerror in it and given that caveat we attempted to gather the 
| 

|data as best we could and to have it as representative as 

possible. 

fo) All right. Now, doctor, what is the function of 

regression analysis? 

A Regression analysis is a statistical technique       oo    



  

  

  

  

  
    

    

      

| 

| [102 

frequently called regression correlation analysis, where you 4 

attempt to see if there is an association between a dependent 3 of the tv 
3 

variable and various independent variables. BE de-annexte 

| © We attempt to explain the variations in the dependent A 

variable, that is the movement in the dependent variables Q 

by movement in the independent variables. method tc 

q In this particular case we are talking about what the data 

Tom the independent variable? : A 

A The independent variables, there were two of them, Q 

where the income, per capita, mean income per capita, was one that were 

of the independent variables and the other one was the percent mean ince 

of race in a particular ward. each race 

9 And what was the dependent variable? of each 1 

A The dependent variable was a percent that a parti- is your ¢ 

cular issue or a particular candidate obtained in a particular on the v: 

race, percent of the total vote in that ward. A 

Q Are there any problems presented by using two 3 statistic 

independent variables rather than one in the same analysis? i Al] stat. 

A No. You want to include probably more than one error in 

variable, because what you are attempting to do is to find Jars as | 

which variable, which thing is effecting the dependent possiile 

lvarizbls. So, when you throw in two or more and then by using ? 

regression correlation analysis you can find out which one regressic 

is the most powerful variable. 

56 L368            



  

  

    

  

  

  

  

g | 
102 2 101 

% 

= you : Did you talk with Mr. Parker about the inclusion 

sndent E of the two small areas that were periodically annexed and 

2 de-annexed? 

Sandent g A Very briefly, yes. We had to face that problem. 

_ : a All right. Now, did you talk with them about what 

Eo method to use or what method he was going to use to handle 

hat 1 the data regarding those two small areas? 

gi A Yes. 

em, ! 0 Now, considering the annexation, the synthetic wards 

a8 ORE that were done the way in which Mr. Parker computed the 

~ercent mean income computation and the use of the percentage of 

each race over the age of eighteen, rather than the ind 

of each race which were actually registered to vote, what 

Ih '{s your opinion as to the possible negative effect this had 

wioular on the validity of the data? 

7 A I felt that we did the best possible job we could do 

4 statistically to obtain the most accurate data we could get. 

sis? § A11 statisticians, all statistical data is going to have some 

” 4 error in it and given that caveat we attempted to gather the 

ind : [data as best we could and to have it as representative as 

possible. 

y using : All right. Now, doctor, what is the function of 

| : 
She ; jregression analysis? 

Regression analysis is a statistical technique 

Sw By          



  

  

  

      

      
    

: 
| | 

wan i 1 4) | 

Q 
frequently called regression correlation analysis, where you 

|Exhibit 
attempt to see if there is an association between a dependent 

variable and various independent variables. 
; 4) me whett 

: - We attempt to explain the variations in the dependent | 

A 
variable, that is the movement in the dependent variables 

: 1Q 
by movement in the independent variables. | 

| ‘A 
Q In this particular case we are talking about what 
i > Q 
was the independent variable? 

1A 
A The independent variables, there were two of them, : 

i Patterns 
where the income, per capita, mean income per capita, was one 

| Q 
of the independent variables and the other one was the percent ; 

| A 
lof race in a particular ward. | 
| \ 

1Q 
i} And what was the dependent variable? | 

A 
A The dependent variable was a percent that a parti- 

Q 
‘cular issue or a particular candidate obtained in a particular : 

Fa 

‘race, percent of the total vote in that ward. 
‘where he 

in Are there any problems presented by using two 
iused in 

independent variables rather than one in the same analysis? 

iv. n 
A No. You want to include probably more than one 

| 3 |variable, because what you are attempting to do is to find 

I Q 
lwhich variable, which thing is effecting the dependent 

: A 
variable. So, when you throw in two or more and then by using 

Product 

regression correlation analysis you can find out which one |i 
he that we 

is the most powerful variable. ; 

= Bb :            



  

  
    

fe | 
po | 103 

nim ET 
Me ; 
i B All right. Mr. Clerk, would you hand the witness 

re you kia 

3. |[Exhibit number 9, please? 
endent 5% | 

$e | Dr. Schlichting, please look at Exhibit 9 and tell 
7 | 
¥ ‘me whether you have ever seen it before? 

apendent Be | 
# lA I have. 

les 4 | 

i IQ What is it? 

gL 
§ ‘A It is Dr. Voyles's desertation. 

what 3 i 

¥ 'Q What is the title? 
A i 

5 A The title of it is "An Analysis of Mobile Voting 
hem, BE: | 

i. |lPatterns, 1948 to 1970". 
7a8 one i : : 

‘0 Have you read the entire thing? 
percent ; 

A No, I have not. 

1Q Have you read parts of it? 
| 

£5 A Yes. 
rti- ba 0 | 

ge. 1Q What parts have you read? 
ticular 

A I have read the methodological parts, the portions 

‘where he deals with the statistics that he had gathered and 

iused in his desertation. 
sis? 

n Does Dr. Voyles use regression analysis? 

e 
A In a manner of speaking, yes. 

ind 
1Q What type of regression analysis does he use? 

A His statistical .analysis is called Pearson's 
y using 

E: ‘Product Moment Method. It is one of two main kinds of ways 
one A | 

3 ‘that we can look at variables and see which ones are A 

foe | Ne |      



  

  

  

  

  

  

    
           
  

    

| 
2d 110 

| the dependent variable. 

| 

'Q Did we use the same method in ours? 
: 1 gé0able 0 

‘A No. We did not. ; 
rime? 

Q What did we use? a 

A We used what is called least squares method. “ Ya 

: ' 3 
4 In terms of Dr. Voyles's methodology, would you ¢ 11d he do 

: : fr 
compare that with ours and tell us what the major differences pS \ 

§ 3 

$ 48 ‘ 
were, if any? i it to the 

tA There are no real major differences. The difference 3 
| 5 compared 

i statistically, the starting point of where you relate the k 
i : £ | MR. STILL 

various variable values to what base you relate the various g : 

; iab 1 ; but 1 i , th i th 5 var able values ut in point of fact, they give you ha tusber 9 

+ S878 answer. ! THE COURI 

0 Did Dr. Voyles trace income and race data as we 

did? 

Q Was the general format of that data, as far as you 
MR. STILL 

‘can tell from the desertation, pretty much the same as ours? : 
0 

A It seemed to be quite similar. In fact, his format 
10 throug 

‘is what we used or attempted to use. 

Q All right. Now, you have explained that the regression : 

the compu 

analysis, using the least squares method which we used can 
through FE 

‘handle two or more independent variables? 
A 

A Correct. 
; 9        



ou 

2rYences 

“erences 

“he 

ious 

1 

ve 

3 you 

ours? 

“ormat 

~egression 

can   
  

  
R
E
S
 

w
n
 

105 
  

# i i, 

Nn Is the Pearson's R regression analysis technique 

R
E
,
 

s
e
 

TR
 

a 

capable of handling more than one independent variable at the 

[a rime? 
£2 Tar 

A Yes, sir, basically. 
él ; 
i 8) As far as you can tell from Dr. Voyles's thesis, 

4 ; 
4 4id he do that, did he use more than one at a time? 

x No. I think not. I think he used race and compared 
A 

A 
# 
[3 

ot 

it to the percent of vote that a candidate got and then he 

| compared income, if I recall correctly. 

2. 

MR. STILL: 

Your Honor, we move the introduction of Exhibit   
    || number 9. 

| 
L £. {' THE COURT: 

All right. 

(Plaintiffs' Exhibit number 9 received   

  

and marked, in evidence) 

MR. STILL: 

0 Would the Clerk please hand the witness Exhibits 

' 10 through 53. 

Dr. Schlichting, have you had a chance to examine 

| the Couputer printouts which begin at Exhibit 10 and go 

| through Exhibit 52? 

i A Yes. 

0 Would you tell the Coyrt what they are as a group, 
  

= 
JJ 

  : :  



  

  

similar to that giving dates and names? 

  
A Yes, they are. 

0 What is the next thing on the computer print out? 

A The original data, the table of the original data. 

Q And how is that data arranged? 

A It is in three columns. The first column is the 

percent of the ward population that is black, over eighteen, 
1 

‘The second column is mean income per capita and ‘the third 

|column -- those are both independent variables -- and the 
| 

third column is the dependent variable. That is the percent 

of vote received in this particular case by Mr. Goode. 

Q All right. Once that data 

THE COURT:   
Let me ask you a question. Do you mean the dependent 

| 

lvariable is dependent on the independent variable? 
i 

A That is correct. That is what we are trying to 

postulate. 

HE COURT: 

| You are saying there is a causal conneeeion? 

No, sir, not a causal connection. There is an A 

influence, we think. We are going to test for an influence 

at work. 

We can't -- statistics say there is a cause and | 
| i 
effect. We don't have that background. 

  

      i tl)   
    

  

A 

causal? 

A Y 

we are tes 

MR. STILL: 

N 

is fed int 

A T 

tell the c 

0 A 

A Y 

Q A 

specifical 

A T 

IBM at Spr 

to print u 

is ict. 

Q Ww 

for? 

A I 

administra 

of differe 

probably a 

       



i308 
  

THE COURT : 

By All right. To use your terminology it is less than 

x? 3 

ka, A Yes. It is influential. At least, that is what 

we are testing. 

MR. STILL: 

2en, 4 | Now, is that all the data, that is raw data that 

. is fed into the computer? 

2 3 A That is correct, other than control cards that 

=ent 3 tell the computer what to do and this sort of thing. 

0 All right. Then is the program fed in? 

A Yes.       
Q All right. Now, is this a program that was written 

=ndent] specifically for this case or is it a standard program? 

A This is a standard program that was supplied by 

| IBM at Springhill, one of many programs. I adjusted it 

  

to print up more than what they supplied, but basically that 

is it, 

Q What other sort of things does Springhill use this 

7 
aE

 
a
 

R
E
E
 

wf 
v
d
 

oe
 

O
D
 

Sk
 

is 
S
a
c
 

Bo
 H
h
 

T
H
A
 w
g 

i 
E
N
 

P
R
 

CR
E 
R
a
s
 
L
E
S
 

H
E
T
 

RE 
NT

 
A
 

S
e
 

AT
 

S
S
 

me
 

ai
g 

T
E
S
 

HEL
 

e
l
 

R
L
 

TI
 

SOR
 

et
 T

O 
AFT 

oy
 al

 
ea
 

ot
 

2 
M
N
 

for? 

Jo
c = 

ice A I don't know that Springhill, per se, that is the 

administration has used it, but I have used it in a number 

ah
aa

 
e
a
 

of different things. I have used it in analysis of factors 

probably affecting bank credit and I have used it in several 

a ia R r— a 
            

  
  
 



    

  
  

    

  

  

Eo reported in his desertation and for various multiple correlat 

i | coefficients that we found when we ran all of these computer : said abou 

print-outs. : A 

1 0 All right. For the top portion of the top sheet first pas 

| you have '"Voyles Pearson's R''? : entered | 

A Yes. i star by ! 

i A And you have a set of dates and under each date you ge | variable 

[ ‘have income and race? ; Q 

A Correct. : MR. AREN 

: q Now, is that the Pearson's R for income and the 4 

pearsons R for race; is that what it is? A 

3 A Yes. : MR. AREN 

0 For each one of the elections that we are talking 

| about? THE COUR 

| A Correct. 

nN Now, under regression, you have only listed a E. | table th 

coefficient. Is that the coefficient of race or income or ¥ MR. STIL 

| of both? ; 3 | 

A That is the coefficient of race, unless otherwise ; A 

! specified. ‘ | MR. STII 

| THE COURT: : 

Hold up. The Reporter has to change his tape. | If you w 

(OFF THE RECORD) | some mor 

IWR. STILL: THE COUF   
  

6%:            



  
    
  

bows | 

Lan Eo | Si 132 

rrelatjon 3 Would you repeat the last sentence or So that you 

“Puter said about the stars? 

A All of our coefficients as shown in the middle of the 

=e t first page and on down refer to race as the factor that 

entered first in the regression analyses unless there is a 

star by it, in which case, income was the most significant 

= you | variable. 

Q All right. 

: MR. ARENDALL: | 

= y Where is a star? 

¢ A There are no stars on the first page. 

4 MR. ARENDALL: 

ing i I see. 
ao 

§ || ™E court: | 

i I think you should make a note at the top of that 

£ | table that it is race unless indicated with a star. 

or ¥ MR. STILL: | 

: | liould you so indicate, please, next to the fetresston 

se i A Yes. 

: MR. STILL: 

Your Honor, I am through looking at my copy of. it. 

If you would like to look at it, we will be referring to it 

some more. 

THE COURT:   
  

63         

TR
E 

Se
ti
 

| P
E
R
R
I
S
 

R
A
R
E
R
 

0   
 



  

  
  

  

All right. 

MR. STILL: 

Now, Dr. Schlichting, is there a point in which 

the multiple correlation coefficient is considered to be 

significant or not significant in regard to the type of 

analyses we have been running here? 

A Well, as Dr. Voyles shows in his desertation, there 

is a table in here that lists the ranges within which these 

are values the regression coefficients are significant or 

not significant. Basically, anything above say fifty -- 

point five, point six, will begin to give you significant 

relationships. J 

Q All right. Now, would that also include above 

if we want to call that a negative point six? 

A Yes. The sign is ignored. 

Q All right. Now, if there was a correlation between 

two variables and the multiple correlation coefficient came 

out to be one point zero with a plus sign in front of ir, 

what would that indicate as to the relationship between the 

two variables? 

HA It would indicate that there is a perfect relation- 

ship between the two variables, that the independent variable 

can perfectly explain the dependent variable. 

Q If the multiple correlation coefficient came out as 

      64   

133 r
e
 

i wr ax
 

   T
T
 

wr
 
ks
 
i
d
 
T
H
 

id 

    

  

  

  

  

along 

MR. ST 

THE CC 

  

with = 

MR. BI 

commor 

to the 

  | THE CC 
       



tion- 

riable 

ut as   
  

133 

  

  

  

  
  

  

  

| where blacks and whites are running against each other that 

MR. STILL: 

along racial lines, what is the cast of this? 

MR. STILL: 

This is to show votes do polarize. 

THE COURT: 

I think we recognize in most elections, particularly 

  that is the case? 

We would point out to your Honor we have only two 

or three instances in the twenty year period in which blacks | 

| have run for the City Commission and these elections we are | 

talking about are, in most cases, whites versus whites so | 

that we can show that there is a racial polarization. 

THE COURT: | 

Yes. Certainly we take common knowledge of that. When 

| 
| Mr. Langan ran he became identified with black voters and | 

  | THE COURT: 

there was a certain polarization there. 

What I am saying, is when race becomes identified 

with a certain candidate, there is a tendency for polarization. 

MR. BLACKSHER: : | 

Tudse, I think we have felt that we have that 

common knowledge, but what we are trying to do is verify that 

to the extent that we can.   
  

n
a
 
F
E
,
 

a
i
n
t
   65° !



  

  

  

THE COURT: 

All right. 

(Plaintiffs' Exhibits 10 through 54, 

inclusive, was received and marked, 

in evidence.) 

MR. STILL: 

0) Dr. Schlichting, that's all the questions I have for   you, at this time. Please answer Mr. Arendall's questions. 

THE COURT: 

You may proceed. 

CROSS EXAMINATION 
  

| BY MR. ARENDALL:   1 Q Dr. Schlichting, without ever putting one finger 
{ 

“on a computer I will ask you whether or not you would have 

figured that in the days of school dessegregation issues, 

| adoption of the Civil Rights Act, the voting rights act 

char there would have been some tendency on the part of 

blacks to vote one wav and the whites to vote another. 

MR. STILL: 

Objection, your Honor. The witness is a statistician 

and not a political scientist or a politician. 

THE COURT: 

Well, if he reads the newspapers and follows current 

—1 148 

  

      6b.     
    

  
  

  

    
Go ahead. 

proof to 

let's tal 

A 

Q 

tell us 

as deter 

anything 

whether 

A 

at -- as 

merely t 

have bee 

"R" squa 

“RY sque 

talk abc 

  

  

A
 

   



tician 

rrent 
  

148 

  
  

  
  
  

  
| proof to recognized facts. 

  

    

vents. I think he can give some opinion, not 2% an expert, 

but as a layman. 

I think it is almost a matter of GoThon knowledge. 

Go ahead. As Mr. Blacksher has said, you can give statistical 

Go ahead. 

A I would have to say yes, certainly. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

0 Now, as far as the statistical proof of this thing, 

let's take a look at it, if you will.   
First, would you tell us what "R" square is? 

A "R'" square is multiple coefficient of determination. 

Q As related to the regression analysis which you did, 

  
tell us how it operates and what it's perimeters are insofar 

| 

as determining whether or not your regressiona analysis shows | 

anything worth looking at, insofar as the matters concerning 

whether race or economics had a greater impact on the election 

In looking   A Regression analysis are also interesting. 

at -- as far as your particular question -- "R" square is 

merely the square of the coefficient of correlation that we 

have been talking about. The reason we used "R" rather than 

"R" square is because Dr. Voyles had used '"R'" rather than 

"R" square. 
1} 

"R" is on a base from zero to one and allows us to 

talk about a scale like -- the power of a variable in explaini   
3
 

  

FP 1 
————— 

  

  

  Fe   | = 

 



  

  
    

  

t+ wards? 

MR. BLACKSHER : 

I think that is what they showed. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

I am not going to stipulate to every one of them. 

It is our impression that they didn't carry many, if any. 

| MR. ARENDALL: 

Q So, Dr. Schlichting, isn't it fair to say that of 

the three black candidates in 1973, if they tended to get 

any votes, they tended to get them from blacks, but didn't 

get any appreciably? 

A My understanding was that these were minor candidate 

yes. 

Q Exhibit 50, 1973 City Commission runoff, Greenough, 

using Voyles's data. What is the "R" square? 

A Point three five one eight. : 

Q Exhibit 51, 1973 change of government referendum? 

A Point six four four nine. 

Q I believe that you told us that in the 1963 government 

change that you found no substantial relationship between 

vote and race, did you not? 

A I can go back and check that. I don't recall having 

      68   
  

         



  

  

  

  

  

ws 2.01 : tee lie 
a Me A L 

= except with respect to the Langan races in 1965 and 1969, 

3 your regression analysis doesn't attempt to show anything 

Ss statistically worth while except with respect to those races? 

x A No, sir. What about the Outlaw one for '65; that 

} was point seven seven, and the Luscher one, that was point 

E seven eight? 

ya. i Q That was a 1965 race between Mr. George McNally and 

7: : Mr. Outlaw, and Mr. McNally had been in office, hadn't he, | 

: for a good while? : 

«ot A I don't know. | 

vet Q Were yoii 1h Mobile, at that time? | 

inte A No, sir. 

0 I guess, then, we get down again you don't know uc 

didates, to quantify factors such as Mr. McNally's conduct in | 

office and any problems he and Mr. Trimmier and others had | 

2ough, been having in that position? | 

| A No, sir. 

0 All of that is omitted from these statistics? | 

ium? A Certainly. | 

Q Now, going back to what you said at the very | 

ernment beginning of your examination by Mr. Still, did I understand | 

ny you to say that the reason that you directed Mr. Parker to | 

use 1970 economic data in connection with certain races | 

having | 

i — 209 | :          



  

  

  

  

  

and did not give an absolute mean income. 

It would say from one thousand to twenty-six hundred 

or something. It did not say the mean income is two 

thousand dollars. Do you follow me? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

No further questions. 

MR. STILL: 

Thank you, Mr. Parker. That's all. 

THE COURT: 

All right. You may step down. 

Why don't we take a ten minute break right here. 
. 

( RECESS ) 

THE COURT: 

All right. You may examine the witness. 

WILEY L. BOLDEN 
  

A Plaintiff, taking the stand in his: own behalf, 

and after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, 

the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand 

and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION   

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

ten (10) 

    m
—
—
—
 

a 

70   

  

  

  

    
  

Bolder 

Dec em! 

Mobil 

His ec 

callec 

of the 

Mobile 

     



  

  

    

  

  

        

— 1200 sea al lms pn FES So 

Q May it please the Court, this is Mr. Wiley L. 

aundred Bolden. He is eighty-three years old. He was born 

December 30, 1892 in Hale County, Alabama. 

He presently resides at 556 Bellsaw Avenue, 

Mobile. He is married and has three great grand-children. 

His education, he finished Tuskegee Normal, I guess it was | 

called then, in those days, Mr. Bolden, in 1911. 

He is presently a member of the board of directors 

of the non-partisan voters league and he has lived in 

Mobile since 1923. 

-e. : Mr. Bolden, did you ever serve in the United | 

States Army? | 

A Yes, sir. 

0 When was that? | 

A Nineteen seventeen, September,1917 to March, 1919. 

Q Did you serve overseas during the first World War? 

A Yes, sir. I d4id. 

f n Where was that? 

58 A In France. | 
h, : | 

1 Q What was your rank when you were mustered out of the 
an Sot? 

A My rank was sargeant. I held the rank of sargeant. 

They didn't have it classified then as it is now, but I was 

| a line sargeant. : 

S—— 
1 - - —— Tt Rn       
 



      
  

        

  

      

  

3 — 1 20 

nN Were you décorated as a result of your service in the A 

Army? 
Q 

A Yes, sir. I was given -- I was sent something like and you w 

a plaque, 
is that c 

0 What did the plaque say? A 

A It said Columbia gives to another son a new accolade Q 

Sud the chivalry of the Army. Wounded in action, September 4, voters dt 

1918. Signed Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States. A 

° And you returned to the United States, you say, in Q 

119197 the perie 

A Yes, sir. 

Q And you moved to Mobile when? 1923? 

IA April, 1923. 

Q After you moved to Mobile, or shortly thereafter, 

: did you attempt -- your Honor, recalling your prior instructions   to me we intend to profer some evidence of how Mr. Bolden was 

jable to register and vote and the circumstances surrounding 

is
 

3 
h
u
 

re
s 

P
i
 
p
n
 

RS 

    

              

: | that. when you 

yr Cop Rights o 

b I Well, I don't see anything before 1950 -- anything A 

| 2 after 1950 -- all right. Go ahead. beanch = 

4 IR. BLACKSHER : a 

1 1 For the record, Mr. Bolden, you did register to vote Q 

; in Mobile County in 1925? : with? 
| | TTR 
| |  



  

  

      
  

    

  

  
        

203 

A Yes, sir. 1 did. 

Q And a white pharmacist, Dr. Ortman vouched for you 

and you were allowed to register because you were a veteran; 

is that correct? 

A Correct. 

Q But there were not very many other black registered 

voters during that period of time? 

estes, J: A No, sir. 

vin Bs Q Were the black voters who were registered during 

the period 1925 to say 1945 organized in any way? 

A No. 

Q Now, Mr. Bolden, did you know Mr. John LeFlore? 

A I did. 

so qQ . Who was a Plaintiff in this case and died just a 

PrucEions few months ago? 

en was A Yoo. 

Sing 0 Would you tell the Court how you and Mr. LeFlore, 

when you and Mr. LeFlore first joined together in a Civil 

Rights organization? 

wing A It was in April of 1925. Ve tovasd the Mobile 

branch -- we organized the Mobile branch for the national 

wo association of the advancement of colored people. 

) Yous 4 Q Approximately how many members did you start off 

Ia g with? | 

i wee Pk TR 

 



  

    
  

  

  
                                    

: I 

ne ; TS Aico, 204 3 . : eid. $04 | 

A Ten. 
going 

Q What kind of activities was the local branch of the time, 

NAACP. principally involved with during the period 1925 | you kn 

until after the second World War? amend 

| MR. ARENDALL: 
and th 

Objection, irrelevant. New Or 

| THE COURT: Q 

| I don't really see any need in going into great A 

detail. I don't want to circumscribe you too much. It is Q 

interesting, but I don't see how it will help us too much A 

unless you have some particular point you want to make. this m 

MR. BLACKSHER: : United 

The only point that we want to show is that the party 

local branch was not actively involved in the securement Q 

| for blacks....... A 

| A During that period, the N.A.A.C.P., the braches, were Q 

| not allowed to participate in politics. It was against the Mr. Mel 

| regulations of the body -- I mean, the national body. in 194: 

0 But the local branch did become active in voter Democr: 

| registration in the second World War, did it not? A 

| A Yes, we did. number 

| 0 Tell the Court what kind of activities the local older 

| branch engaged in? Sheriff 

| A We engaged in the direction of our group being -- Q 

i Ta :   
   



| 204 205   

- 

going down registering and those who could -- well, at that 

time, they had to be vouched for, you know about that, and 

| you know the restrictions. That was after the Boswell 

amendment was declared unconstitutional, and then in 1946 -- 

and then in 1948 the case that came up from --went up from 

New Orleans through a member of the N.A.A.C.P.   
Q Davis versus Schnell?   

| A No. That is a Mobile case. 

Q Oh, I am sorry. 

A Mr. Schnell was the register here in Mobile, but 

| 

| 

this man -- this man carried the Democratic party to the | 

United States Supreme Court. The suit involved the Democratic 
| 
| 

he party of the south who said it was then a private party. 

Q You are talking about Smith versus Allwright? 

A That is what I am talking about.   
2S, were Q Were you one of the black voters referred to in     

Mr. McLaurin's article which is already in evidence who went, | 

in 1944, and attempted to register and vote in the all white 

Democratic primary here in Mobile?   
3 A I am. John LeFlore, Napolean Rivers,me and any   

number of others, Alec Herman and -- oh, any number of the 

al gE older citizens, but we were debarred by it then, the then 

Sheriff Holcomb.   ig an Q All right. Do you recall then the Davis versus 

lo 
    
        

  eo 
Re
gi
er
 

W
E
 

 



   
  

A Oh, yes, we do. 

' | | 3 
er 

—
—
—
 

  

opposed it.   

    Yes.    A 

of the black community? 

A Mr. Langan asked the legislature 

     
   

salaries.     

Schnell case striking down the Boswell amendment? 

Q Thereafter, was there some other activity in the 

legislature, that you can recall, where the Boswell amendment 

or something like this was attempted to be re-established 

! in Mr. Joe Langan, as a state legislator, fought against it? 

| A Yes, sir. But my memory does not serve me well 

| enough to say who advocated that kind of legislation, but it 

was attempted and Mr. Langan, then a very fair minded and 

fine citizen, as well as one who represented the people, he 

Mr. Langan first came to the attention of the local branch 

as being one of the politicians who was acting in what was 

perceived to be in the interest of the black community? 

! I Q What else did Mr. Langan do that caught the attention 

he held up -- he was then a Senator from Mobile. He was 

State Senator and he held up all legislation there until the 

black teachers of Mobile County were given equalization in 

In other words, he equalized the salaries of the blas 

Q Well, do you remember that that was about the time that 

    
-- in other words, 

    

      

  

     
             
    
    
    
    
          
   
    

  

  
       
        

  

        

a
 

    

    

  

‘76   
          
    

  

   

   
      

    

      
    

        

       
  

  
  

teache: 

with ma 

Alabam: 

Q 

branch 

A 

fairne: 

they stu 

Q 

non-pas 

differe 

voters 

A 

of Alat 

into Cc 

Judge c 

against 

other w 

turn ow 

common E 

all thc 

N.A.A.C 

fine ors 

  

      
 



  

  

  

    

        
  

% 207 

ks | teachers of Mobile County and that, in my judgment, made him 

2 with me, especially, one of the most outstanding men in 

“he 3 Alabama. 

andment 2 0 Was he thereafter supported actively by the local 

1ed © branch in his various election campaigns? 

gt it? 3 A Yes, he was. All blacks who realize what he -- his 

11 4 fairness toward them and that had -- I won't say that any way 

ut it : | they supported to Mr. Langan because they should. 

and i Q Did the local branch -- well, I guess it was the 

2, he non-partisan voters league. Describe to the Court the 

difference between the local branch and the non-partisans 

time that voters league? 

anch A During 1963, when Mr. Patterson was the governoc. : 

was of Alabama, then, and the N.A.A.C.P. was sued and brought 

{ into Court in Montgomery, Judge Walter Jones was the presiding 

Judge or Circuit Judge there, then, and he gave a judgment 

tention . against the N.A.A.C.P. for a hundred thousand dollars. In | 

! other words, the chief counsel for the N.A.A.C.P. refused to | 

words, | turn over to him the list of its membership, because it was 

1s commonly conceited that reprisals would be taken against 

il the all those who held jobs like teachers and what-not. 

1 in So, Robert Carter was then the chief counsel for the 

N.A.A.C.P. and he refused and thay slapped a hundred dollar 

the black fine on him and he immediately appealled the case to the 

et el eam ” 55 -             
 



  

  
    

    
          

United States Supreme Court and, of course, we were held up 

for eight years. 

0 What did that have to do with the non-partisans 

voters league?     
A When they debarred the N.A.A.C.P., the injunction 

Judge Jones gave against us debarred us from activity,   
our case was pending in the United States Supreme Court.   So, we went, what you might call, underground and 

organized the non-partisans voters league and we kept the 

work of Civil Rights going just the same.   Q What year was that? 

A Nineteen sixty-three to nineteen seventy-one. 
| 

THE COURT: 

What years were those? 

Nineteen sixty-three to nineteen seventy-one.         tA 
| MR. BLACKSHER: 

What happened in 1971, Mr. Bolden? 

The United States Supreme Court gave, you know, the 

the N.A.A.C.P. didn't have to turn over the membership 

i 

| 
11st and the fine was set aside. 

0 But the nonpartisan voters league remained on and 
| 
is still, today, is a separate branch of the N.A.A.C.P.? 

‘A Yes, sir. Very much so. 

becaus 

  

    
  

208 

  

| 
| 
| 

| i 
— 

| | “nl 

  

  

  

  
p
a
i
n
 

iT
 

Ll 
er
 

ab
t 

5 
R
E
 

ide 
Tat 

sgl 
ve 

dd 
4 

L
T
R
 

    
A 

& 
pi 
ood 
Z 

h
i
 

& 

  

rememt 

{ 

1 

black 

lA 

0 

A 

becaus 

date 1 

overal 

  

t
v
 

a
 

vd 
: 

Pn
 

hd 
A
 

8    



  

  

      
  

  

  

  

  
  

          

1d up & 
¥: Q In the time you have been with the nonpartisans 

£ voters league and before then, with the -- well, let's say 

13 = 1965, and that is when you were in the nonpartisan voters 

league, have you and the other members ever discussed or 

ion : attempted to encourage a qualified black candidate for the 

because i Mobile City Commission? 

: A I think we did. I am sure we did. 

and 3 ' Q Do you recall who and when? | 

he 3  s Now, the cartwheel, by memory, doesn't click that well, 

but I do know we discussed it and some persons did run or did | 

attempt to run, | 

Q You are thinking about 1973 when Ollie Lee Taylor | 

and Lula Albert and Alphonso Smith ran? | 

A Oh, yes. I see I had forgotten them, but that -- 

a yes, I think you are right. I know you are, because I 

2 remember Ollie Smith, because he is now in Florida. 

Bb Before then, were you successful in getting any other 

the | bisek qualified citizens to run? 

% A Not that I recall. 

kp H 0 Wh ? : ) y not 

A Well, one thing, we felt that it would be futile, 

rd because -- I mean, that year, when we knew if we ran a candi- 

: date in Mobile -- in the City of Mobile, it would be an 

i overall thing and we didn't have enough votes to elect 

= 76° fer 
leg |     
 



  

P.O. BOX 1971 

MOBILE, ALABAMA 

  

| 

lanybody and, of course, we had to wait until;- in other words, 

our political strength was not -- we didn't feel was well 

iecnough up to advocate such a thing and I don't feel that same 

  way now, if you are going to take it from an overall standpoin 

‘I think it would be futile. 

n Mr. Clerk, would you hand the witness Plaintiffs’ 

‘Exhibit 67? I don't think we have marked it now, but it is   | 

down there. 

1 Mr. Bolden, I want you to look at these documents 

which are various affidavits signed by black persons. Ome of 

‘them is an affidavit by Henrietta Smith saying that she had 
{ 

‘been unable to register, because she had not passed the 

{State voting test on August 3rd, 1964. 

I Another one, James Brooks, dated August 5, 1964 8   ‘saying that he had been denied the right to register as a 

i voter, because he incorrectly answered two of several differen 

questions of government. 

| Similar affidavits by Joe O. Dickson...... 

|THE COURT: 
| 

| Are you referring to the State government? I 

iunderstand there were no Federal registrars in Mobile? 

‘MR. BLACXSHER: 

| Yes, 

| August 3, 1964. Another one by -- well, I am aorry. Here is 

sir. Another one by Joe 0. Dickson, dated 

  
— 

  
    c. 9Y   

a
 

r
e
 

P
A
 

YY
 

   

  
  

  

S
A
R
S
 

a
 

the bc 

separs 

compel 

admon£ 

regist 

MR. BL 

Exhibi 

MR. AR 

have n 

nation 

       



eY words, 

well 

nat same 

standpoint, 

ffs 

it is 

64 

Ss a 

different   
a d 

ere is   
  

  

i
 

P
R
E
 

EA
T 

  

i
 

I
R
 

    

211: 
  

a petition dated June 16, 1964 addressed to the Mobile County 

board of registrars signed by Mr. LeFlore and others; do you 

see that? 

A Yes, sir. I do. 

0 Concerning the tests that were being given to persons 

as they attempted to register?   A Yes. 

0 And finally, an affidavit by a Carrie Louise 

Marshall dated February 11, 1965, saying that she went to 

the board of registrars and was asked there to sit in a 

separate room whee negro would be registrants would be 

compelled to sit and take their tests, that she obeyed the 

admonitions of the white woman official of the board of 

registrars and went to the negro registration room. 

Can you verify that these are records that we have 

taken from the files of the non-partisan voters league? 

A I can. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

We move their admission, in evidence, as Plaintiffs’ 

Exhibit 67, your Honor. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

| If your Honor please, they are clearly hearsay. I 

I am satisfied there was some discrimi- have no objection. 

nation against them. 

           



  

  

  

  

    
  

    
  

  

      

| MR. BLACKSHER: * la 

| We offer them to show the latest date on which we THE CO 

could find overt .....s 

i THE COURT: secret. 

What is that date? A 

OR. BLACKSHER: MR. ARI 

February, 1965. Q 

OR. ARENDALL: would Et 

All except the last one relate to occurrences in A 

19647 3 

i. BLACKSHER: followe 

That is correct, except the 1965 was a segregated as set 
| 

| registration line. A 

H 1 Mr. Bolden. That's all I have. One of the other Q 

lawyers may ask questions, A 

| THE COURT: own fre 

Admitted in evidence, and you may cross examine him. Q 

; (Plaintiffs' Exhibit number 67 was received THE COUF 

and marked, in evidence) 

i Mr. Bold 

| substant 
l CROSS EXAMINATION i 

| - 
| BY MR. ARENDALL: | ® 
| | + {ITHE COUR 

E Mr. Bolden, have you held any place other than that | 3 

+] of a direstor of the non-partisan voters league? "1 Ta : 

       



or iy 20 

ch we 

pated 

other   
ine him. | 

rn that | 

AIR aa 
i 
| 
i 
| { i 
{ 

  

213   
    

  

A Well, we didn't have so many offices there. 

THE COURT: 

Have you ever been president, vice-president, 

secretary or treasurer? 

A No. Judge, I haven't; no, sir. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Have you been one of those who have determined who   would be endorsed on the pink sheet? 

A I have. 

9] Have you considered that the blacks of Mobile have 

followed the endorsements of the non-partisan voters league   as set out in the pink sheet? 

A No, sir. 

Q You say they have not followed them? | 

A If they followed them, they followed them of their | 

own free will and accord. 

b) Well, whether -- I understand that each..... 

THE COURT: 

The question is, though, the thrust of it is, 

dr. Bolden, is it your judgement that the black voters have 

vibstaneially followed the recommendations of the pink sheet? 

A Yes, sir. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

          
  

 



  

    

  

  
  
‘were elected to the various offices to which -- of which they 

sought, and the people believed in us, because we did not 

give them any misinformation. 

A I do. 

MR, ARENDALL: 

nN In your opinion, is it proper to characterize the 
AS 

black voters of the City of Mobile as now constituting a block 

  vote? 

{A No, sir. 

0 In your opinion, would such characterization have been 

proper and, if so, during what periods of time? | 

A I don't think that -- I don't think that it had 

ever been so. I think that the people -- the black people of 

Mobile, who voted -- who went to the poles to the various 

wards where they voted, they voted their:.convictions and the 

non-partisan voters league put out a ballot and simply said 

that these are the men that we have screened and have taken 

their positions as to what their platform would be if they 

  
MR. ARENDALL: 

nN Well, is it fair to say that voting their convictions 

the black individual voters did what the pink sheet requested | 

| 
them to do? 

A Most people who go to the poles now of all groups 

      83 pe 
         



> the 

> a block 

  
have bean 

1ad 

sople of 

Lous 

and the 

7 said 

taken 

they 

.ch they 

not   
wictions 

| 

quested | 

  

--—y-214 

  

215 
  

poles of all groups, they go there and vote, because somebody 

has given them some information about the attitude or the 

position of the candidates who is running for office and I 

think our people did the same thing. They didn't vote them, 

because we told them -- they didn't go by that sheet, pardon 

me. 

THE COURT: 

He is not suggesting coercion. What he wants to know, 

is do the black voters usually vote for the same candidate? 

A No, sir. 

THE COURT:   All right. Go ahead. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Mr. Bolden, do you reneiber talking to your lawyers 

and I don't know which ones you talked to, but about answering 

some interrogatories that we put to each of the named 

Plaintiffs in this case? 

A I guess I do. 

9) Do you remember telling them how you wanted to answer 

those questions for yourself, telling them what you thought 

the answers were? 

A I did. 

THE COURT: 

Mr. Arendall, I ,sually ask the lawyers to stay at 

              85



  

  

  

    

HA I don't know. 

  

their counsel table unless they have some document they want 

to show to the witness. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

I was going to let him look at it. 

Q I would like for you, Mr. Bolden, to look at 

interrogatory number 40-A and tell the Court whether I 

correctly read this. 

In your opinion, is it proper to characterize the 

black voters of the City of Mobile as now constituting a 

block vote. Now, I want to show you the answer that your 

attorneys filed on your behalf, and there is a paragraph 

here where you will see that they say they thought this was 

' an objectionable interrogatory, but look at the "A" and do 

they say and do you say to answer that question, "Yes". 

Is that what the answer says to your interrogatory? 

It doesn't have my name there. 

THE COURT: 

Does 40-A read No. That is not the question. 

The Court takes judicial knowledge that it reads 

yes. I just read it there, really. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

  

    
| 

Q Forty - B, "In your opinion, would such characterization 

ever have been proper and, if so, during what period(s) 

    86 

  

THE C 

answe: 

THE Ct 

THE CC 

       



  

  
  

    
    

    

4 LAE PURE REE SB ow 11 

of time,"? And was your answer to that, "B','yes, from the 

ley want 
time that blacks were disinfranchised to the present." 

Was that your answer, sir? 

THE COURT: 

He is asking you, Mr. Bolden, if that is the answer 

that appears here? 

I 
A I would like to make that a little more clear to 

me. 

e the | 

MR. ARENDALL: | 

1g a 
Q Excuse me. Tell me whether or not that is the 

your 
answer? 

-aph 
THE COURT: 

11s was . 
I can see it does. 

and do : 
A Yes. 

THE COURT: 

ygatory? 
Who are they propounded to and whom are they signed 

y | 
4 by? | 

MR. ARENDALL: | 
sad 

Judge, they were all signed by counsel, by agree- 

ment of the parties. 

reads 
THE COURT: 

They were addressed to Bolden and others? 

| MR. ARENDALL: 

racterization 
That is correct. 

(8) : 

it ———————————— -—— 87           
 



  

  

  

      
  

    
  

  

  

      

- | -- 
TT ——— v—- a— 

A 
THE COURT: 

2 THE +» 
All right. 

MR. STILL: 

| Just for the record, your Honor, I believe they 

MR. . 
, are signed individually. 

| THE COURT: 
THE ¢ 

: Well, let me see the answers. 

MR. ARENDALL: | 

| A 
I beg your pardon, on the back of what I have here 

= ; dual 
is your signature here, isn't it? 

: : THE 
| A That is my name. 

Q And that is in that same sheaf ‘of papers, the 

the . 
| answers that I just asked you about? 

i | 
A 

| A What does this say? 

THE 
bs | MR. ARENDALL: 

1 | That is what they call an affidavit. 
ti A 
bi vA I know it is an affidavit, but what does it pertain 
+H 

to a: 
i to? Did I sign that affidavit? : 
ah | Yes. i THE COURT: | 

! I 
THE 

f Is it your signature? 
| 
| 

} A That is my signature, yes. | 
} A | THE COURT: 
il i MR. 
| Do you recall signing it? 

| Q 

y 
| -. SB        



  

  
  

  

    

    

an 214 218 
epi P20 § 

A I do. 

THE COURT: 

All right. Just one minute. 

they Have they been introduced in evidence? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

No, sir. 

THE COURT: 

| They should be marked, for identification. 

Ve here | A I would like to see if I made that statement indivi- 

dually. 

THE COURT: 

he Mr. Bolden, that is what it Shove. These show 

the answers made by you and you signed it. 

A Yes, sir. : 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

pertain A All right. Then it is true that I signed it and 

| to anything else, because of my memory I will retract that. 

| Yes. 

THE COURT: 

You were born in what year? 

A Eighteen ninety-two, December 30. 

MR. ARENDAIL: 

Q Mr. Bolden, the non-partisan voters league endorsed 

— &8 grr pe         
 



  

Mr. Taylor and Mr. Smith in their campaigns for the City 

Commission in 1973, did they not?     
  | A I think so. 

| 

| Q Did they endorse Lula Albert? 

| A I am not sure. I can't answer that. I don't   remember, Mr. Arendall.   0 You knew Mr. Taylor, did you not? 

iA Yes, sir. 

i Q You did not know Mrs. Albert or Mr. Smith, did you? 

r Now, just a minute. 

| THE COURT: 

| Give him time. He is an old man. 

| MR. ARENDALL:   1 Q Let's take them -- did you know Mrs. Albert before 

i she became a candidate?       A Are these black candidates? 

Q Yes, sir. 

A What year was this? 

2? Nineteen seventy-three. 

A To the best of my memory, I cannot recall, to be 

truthful, and I couldn't say anything that I wouldn't stand   
jon. I wouldn't,   

So, I don't remember the non-partisan voters league 

endorsing these candidates and, so far as I am concerned, in         

r Tw i nee 
-~        



po
nd
 

0
 

~d
 

N
 

4
 

. 

(a
s 

oo 
i 

tb
e 

=
 

v 

=
 

rt
 

£ o 0 ] pt
 

[8
 

(5
 

~ ps
 

m be
 

[—
 

a
 

Bi
 = © os
 (9
) = Qe
 

oq
 ® o ® 0 fo]

 = [2]
 

® =
 £ (© po 

| 
(a
 

MR. ARENDALL: 

May 1 ask counsel if they are willing to stipulate 

to his answers?             A. No. I must say I think I had been operated on in 

: | 1972 and was in the Veteran's Hospital in Birmingham, Alabama 

at that time. 

All right. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

THF. COURT: 
| 

May I ask counsel. if they would stipulate that | 

|   

  
    

  

  

  
  

  

    

Mr. Bolden's answers to interrogatories, by saying he did 

before know Mr. Taylor but did not know Mrs. Albert and Mr. Smith 

and did not support Mr. Taylor? | 

| | Well, that is all right. No further questions. 

| | MR. BLACKSHER: 
| 

| Well, I would like to say, for the record, Mr. Bolded 

| has signed the interrogatories, but the Court will see that | 

to be | there were a number of interrogatories filed and each one is | 

t stand | made up of a set of interrogatories which were drafied by | 

| | the lawyers. We take responsibility for them, although they 

s league | | vere approved by the witnesses and an appendix, in each case, 

rned, in of individual information and I would like to say, for the 

rT S07 pO 
| :       
 



  

' record, that the way we interpreted the question and the There we) 

interrogatory itself pertained to, as we understood the 

| question, to whether or not blacks had voted in a polarized prior to 

! fashion. 
my Oppone 

Nn 
THE COURT: 

) 

All right. Go ahead. A 

"Leader", 
: MR. BLACKSHER:   i i ’ 

No further questions. picture 

MR. ARENDALL: 
some Word 

second tc 
No further questions. 

| THE COURT: 
opponent 

| You may come down, Mr. Bolden. . judgment, 

MR. MENEFEE: 
reasons a 

Your Honor, we would like to call Mr. James   
    i Buskey to the stand. some of t 

the wordi 

i JAMES E. BUSKEY effect, h 

i the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs that I re 

I 
and after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, thel the repre 

I whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and Q 

} 

| testified as follows: A 

| 
inside, 1 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
workers o   

| BY MR. MENEFEE: | 
| 

was the o 

  
               



WLR 1 3 

  
  

  

There were none of this nature. 

However, there was, during the runoff, the week 

prior to the runoff, literature that was distributed by 

my opponent that I considered to be racially oriented. 

n Could you describe that literature? 

A Yes. It was a full page tabloid called the 

"Leader", and on the front of it, the full page tabloid, my 

picture was there and covering about a third of the page and 

some wording to the effect that this is the man that ran 

second to me. The literature was, of course, printed by my 

opponent and that, to me, was an indication that, in my 

judgment, it was racially motivated and I can go into my   
reasons as to why I thought so. 

I had, at one time, the tabloid, but 1 lost it. But 

some of the wording, although nothing specific about race, 

the wording that was on the tabloid said something to the 

effect, help me to win the election, and the implication was 

that I read into it that if I did not win, this would be 

the representative of Senate district thirty-three. 

Q And your picture appeared there? 

A On the front -- there were other pictures, but on the 

inside, indicating pictures of campaign workers and campaign 

workers of my opponent, but on the front of it my picture 

was the only one there. 

          ; 93    



  

  

3 
———— Ob 

10) Do you know if this tabloid was distributed throughout 

| Senate district thirty-three, but only in some areas? 

A It was not widely distributed. There were two areas 

we were able to pinpoint the distribution of that literature.   
      

Q Where was this? 

A One was the Eight Mile -- Whistler area and the other 

one HES the Chickasaw area. 

Q Are those areas predominantly white? 

A Yes, sir. TI think Chickasaw may be virtually all 

white. 

| Q What can you tell me about the racial composition of     Senate district number thirty-three? . 

A The composition of Senate district thirty-three is 

generally fifty percent white and black. It might be as high 

as fifty-three or fifty-four percent black.   Q Is that population you refer to? 

A Population, yes. 

THE COURT: 

Fifty-fifty, black and white, or maybe a fifty-four 

- forty-eight black and white; is that right?   A Right. Let me -- because I think you are exactly           
right in terms of population. It might be a little high     something like fifty-six or fifty-seven in terms of popu- 

  

  
+94"     

  

lation in favor of the blacks. | 

f   
         



  

    
  

          
          

23 

— 1 228 

throughoit by addressing more forcefully those issues? 

» A Very definitely; yes, sir. 

WO areas Q Do you have an opinion as to why they didn't address 

yd rerature. those issues more forcefully if they wanted the votes? 

A On the part of white candidates who actively 

the other sought or who would actively seek the black votes, in my 

judgement, that if that person -- if those people are 

| interested in winning, they would not pursue that course 

y all | of action, because they would have what you call a white 

backlash in the white community, in my judgement, yes. 

{tion of Q One student of local politics, Dr. Voyles said that 

a substantial black vote for a white candidate would be a kiss 

vos is of death for that candidate if he was forced into a run:7f 

as high Would you agree with that assessment? 

A I agree. This is basically what I tried to pinpoint 

| in my statement. If white candidates sought to address 

| themselves to concerns of black residents, in my judgement, 

| 
they will receive a white backlash. 

= THE COURT: 
~y-four 

{ 
All right. Let's knock off until tomorrow. Be here 

at nine o'clock tomorrow. 
ctly 

gh | ( COURT ADJOURNED ) 

pu- 

| CL 95st 
|     



  

  

  

  

  

A Prior to 1974, in my estimation, it would have been 

a waste of time and money. One would have to run, at large, 

in either the City or County and, given that set of facts, 

the chances of winning the City election or County election 

on the part of a black would be nill. 

Q The Prichard election, City elections are at large, 

are they not? 

A Yes, sir. 

0 And many blacks have sought office for the City 

elections in Prichard? 

A Yes, sir. 

Q What is the difference between Prichard and Mobile 

or Mobile County? 

A In the City of Mobile in Mobile County, the voting 

strength of blacks is substantially lower than that of whites 

In the City of Prichard itself you have a black population 

that is in the majority. Whether that is about fifty-five 

or fifty-eight percent, I am not sure, but it is a majority 

and consequently the potential voting strength of blacks in 

the City of Prichard is in the majority. 

A black candidate running for an election in the 

City of Prichard has at least an equal chance of success at 

| being elected and I think they are good. 

n Do you know either Mr. Alphonso Smith, Mrs. 

  

canvas 

a gres 

the vc 

  

    
        96        



  

  

  
          

= 
242 

———— 

race this past election? ' 
mave been 

A We have five who actively participated. There were 
—t large, 

seven who qualified. 
facts, 

Q Yas there a heated campaign? 

=lection 
A It was a very vigorous campaign. There was no 

| issues that burned in terms of controversy, but it was very 
t large, 

vigorous in the sense that we had five people actively 

campaigning for votes and, to this extent, I guess you could | 

Bi say heated, but not heated in terms of controversial issues. 

ty 
Q Was there, to your knowledge, any door to door 

| 

canvassing or offers to take voters to the polls and sort of 

a great deal of direct contact between the candidates and 
Mobile 

the voters? 

A Yes, sir. At least one, perhaps two. I know for a 
voting 2 

fact that one candidate did offer to take voters to the polls 
of whites 

to vote and, as well to the Courthouse to register them. We 
dation 

it did extensive door to door campaigning and I am sure, to some 
w-five 

extent, some of the other candidates did some, but not 
ajority : 

extensively. The offers to take voters to the polls and, you 
acks in 

know, register voters to register. 

. 0 Within the black community what are some of the 
1 the 

major endorsing groups? 
“ess at 

| A I would imagine that the two major endorsing groups 

| would be -- one, the non-partisan voters league and, two, 

{p= WL     
 



  

  

only reason I interrupt, the projected trial time, which is 

rather lengthy and if these matters are between black candi- 

dates and majority black districts, I just think we are 

wasting time. If you had a hlack and white candidate, you 

might have some relative issue. It is extremely interesting. 

TI like politics, hut .....c.s 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Yes, sir. I was following this line of questioning 

{ 

to show a black perspective on the strength of the non-partisan 

voters league. 

THE COURT: 

Well, if it is between blacks, what help does it 

have to us? 

MR. MENEFFE: 

All right, sir. 

THE COURT: 

I think it would have some relevance if it was 

white and black votes or candidates. 

MR. MEREFEE: 

Yes, sir. 

0 Mr. Buskey, do you have any opinions as to why more 

blacks don't seek election to the City Commission and the 

County Commission and the County School Board? 

A Yes, I have. Punning at large, they wouldn't have 

{ 

  
  

vhat ye 

to that 

HR. ME} 

Fxhibit 

voter ft 

  
        98        



tioning 

H 

1-partisan 

3 

  
ly more 

the 

have   
  

  

a éhanae. The way it is presently constituted, running at 

large would be a waste of time and money and energy. 

" Do you think many more blacks would seek election to 

these offices if they thought the chances were better? 

A Yes, sir. 

é. We have discussed the interest that was created in 

louse district ninety-nine by the race this past May. 

247 

  There were many other races being run at the time 

for County Commission and other posts, were there not? 

A Yes, sir. 

0 In those races, County Commission, in particular, 

  can you name any candidates that made any appeals to the 

black community for their votes, any substantial appeals: 

A Yesterday I tried to indicate that white candidates 

in those races did campaign on the black communities. 

THE COURT: 

Let's don't go over the same thing. I remember 

vhat you said yesterday. If you have something additional 

to that, you may. 

IR. MENEFEE: 

Mr. O'Connor, would you hand Mr. Buskey Plaintiffs’ 

Fxhibit number 3, please? TI am sorry, I mean number 4. 

Mr. Buskey, Plaintiffs’ Pxhibit number 4 shows 

voter turn out in predominantly black wards and predominantly 

        93   i



  

  

white wards during elections this past May? 

THE COURT: 

What is the number of the Exhibit? 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Plaintiffs' Exhibit number 4, your Monor. 

  THE. COURT: 

All right. 

| '‘R, MENFFFER: 

| Nn There are five wards listed as predominantly black 

in the lefthand colum, four of them being within House 

ninety-nine? 

! A Yes. . 

| 7 The turn out figure, rate of turn out, for those 

four districts reflect twenty-eight point four percent for 

County Commission place number one and then, taking the one 

| other predominantly black district, district number 

thirty-five - one zero three - one, which, I believe, lics 

i in representative Garv Cooper's House district? 

| A Yes. 

n It shows a turn cut of twenty-two point seven 

percent ~- see it with the asterisk in the middle of the page?   
A ‘Yes. 

J And then for the runoff it falls off to sixteen 

| point five percent? 
          “100 |        



  

A 

Q 

Yes. 

It shows a difference in the runoff election from when 

black 

R08e 

for 

le one 

lies 

en 

i 3 Okay. That's all on that. 

  

your race was being run against Mr. Flannagan of eleven -- 

almost eleven percent between the black districts and 

‘louse ninety-nine and the one black district we have been 

able to sample outside of House ninety-nine. 

Do those figures agree with your general observa- 

tions on voter interests in the black community? 

A Yes, sir. 

I would like to ask you a few questions further 

about -- referring to Plaintiffs' Exhibit number three. 

Again, we have predominantly black wards and 

predominantly white wards. On the second sheet we have turn 

out figures on the second sheet of it we have turn out figures 

for 1973 City Commission race and we see, for example, place 

one runoff..... 

"IR. ARENDALL: 

I beg your pardon. What Exhibit are you looking at? 

IR. MENFFEE: 

This is number three. Place one runoff, which was 

the contest between Mr. Breenolsh and Mr. Bailey. 

You see a turn out differential between the black 

wards and the white wards of eighteen point seven percent for 

    
  

          101"



  

  ——1 28% 

time. 

Because of the quickness on which it was focused, 

I think that, to a large extent, many blacks felt that it 

would continue and consequently the polls were forgotten 

and a lot of other processes. 

THE COURT: 

| All right. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Your Honor, there will be other witnesses who 

can discuss more fully the Joe Langan race in 1969 and 

hb) Mr. Langan, later at the County Commission in 1972. We have 

some turn out figures In our Exhibit number 3 that reflect 

blacks turning to the polls in substantial numbers. 

TPF. COURT: 

All right. You may come down. 

Whom will you have next. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

Mr. Joe Langan. 

JOSEPH LANGAN   
  

the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and 

after having first heen duly sworn to tell the truth, the 

whole truth and nothing but the truth, took the stand and 

testified as follows: 

          102 
  

Langan. 

267 Houst 

whole 11if 

Mobile. 

held duri 

A 

Senate ar 

Commissic 

1 was on 

and other 

Q 

Represent 

A 

0 

A 

Q 

served or 

A 

in "47 ar 
       



— 288 

  

  
  

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

0 May it please the Court, this is Mr. Joseph’ N. 

Langan. We is sixty-four years old. Presently resides at 

267 Houston Street, Mobile, Alabama. 

He has been a resident of Mobile, Alabama, his 

whole 1ife. He is presently a practicing attorney in 

Mobile. 

Mr. Langan, tell the Court the offices you have 

held during your career as a public servant in Mobile? 

A Well, I served in the Alabama House and the Alabama 

Senate and Mobile County Commission and the Mobile City 

Commission, as far as elective jobs are concerned. Of cou: :« 

1 was on the board of education and numerous other positions 

and other appointive positions. 

nN You were elected to the Alabama House of 

Representatives in 19397 

A Right. 

0 And served one term? 

A Yes. : 

Q You were elected to the Alabama Senate in 1947 and 

served one term? 

A Well, the election was in '46 and the term began 

in '47 and I served one term; yes, sir. 
sn 

    

  

289 

        108°"   
 



  

  

      
    

    

n And you were an elected Commissioner of the City 

of Mobile from 1953 till 19697 

A Yea, sir. 

9) And you sald you served briefly as a County 

Commissioner. 

Would you explain that? 

\ " Well, I served a little over one year on appointment 

as a County Commissioner. 

That was in 1950 and '51? 

A Right. 

nN So, altogether you won, through the elective 

process, one term as a State representative, one term as 

a State Senator and four terms as a City Commissioner? 

  A Yes, sir. 

n And you were defeated three times at the polls? 

A Yes. 

0 In 1951 by Mr. Tom Johnston and that race was for 

the i... 4. 

A State Senate. 

Q In 1969, by Mr. Bailey for the City Commission? 

A Yes. 

n And in 1972 in a runoff with Mr. MCConnell for the 

County Commission in the Democratic primary? 

A Yes. 

  

    . 294 

290 

    
  

  

racial 

service 

bus sit 

Boswell 

they in 

Alabama 

stated 

Senator 

until w 

end of 

was oth 

the equ 

teacher 

THE COU 

aimed = 

A 

MR. BL! 
         



ELIS Wh 4 8   

0 : Mr. Langan, do you attribute your loss in 1951 to 

Mr. Johnston in any way to racial factors? 

A . Yes, sir. I feel that that was one of the main 

factors in that election. 

0 Specifically how did it come into the picture? 

A Well, I had been rather critical of some of the 

>intment racial practices in Mobile from the time I got out of the 

service and was elected to the State Senate regarding the 

bus situation in Mobile and also in the State Senate the 

Boswell amendment had been declared unconstitutional ‘and 

they introduced a new amendment to regulate voting in 

as Alabama and tried to cure some of the defects that the Court 

stated had =xisted in the Boswell amendment and four other 

Senators and myself filibustered for several days and worked 

-8? until we finally defeated it by filibustering it through the 

end of the session of the legislature and, of course, there 

for was other action that I had taken on helping to bring about   the equalization of pay for both black and white school   teachers in the Mobile County school system. 

n? | || mE cour: 

The Boswell amendment was really a literacy test 

T the Hd aimed at blacks, wasn't it? 

3 A Yes, sir.   MR. BLACKSHER: 
        ig            



  

  

    
  

  

  
            

ie lm 
* about 

Q And you are saying that those actions you took on 

A 
hehalf of equalizing black and whites hurt you in that electidn? 

n 
A I am sorry, I didn't get that. : 

. that s- 
0 Those actions hurt you in 19517? 

: could - 
A I think, at that time, it very definitely did. From 

A 
correspondence I received and from things in the legislature 

oa ” out th: 
and all it played an important part in that election and, of 

. and ot! 
course, at that time, very few blacks were voting. 

ideal 1 
2 That was still at the beginning of your political 

be cor 
career, so to speak. 

Fs were Ct 
What lessons did you learn from that campaign on 

more {ir 
racial overtone issues? 

that we 
Ad Well, I don't know. As I say, sometimes I began 

obtain 
to realize that no matter how high the ideals you might 

pure ic 
have, sometimes you have to be a pragmatist and realize there 

N 
are certain things more important to a person's economic 

he accc 
livelihood and things of that nature. So that there are 

advise 
areas that you should work in that can bring about good and 

; seek re 
still don't bring a lot of clash and a lot of animosity. 

A 
Nn You knew John LeFlore? 

legal rt 
A Yes. 

our gov 
¢ And during the time that you were on the City 

have 1s 
Commission of Mobile you had occasion, didn't you, on several 

denied 
occasions, to deal with Mr. LeFlore and hear his complaints 

106      



yok on 

at electiq 

ld. From 

_8lature 

and, of 

tical 

v 

several 

laints 

n? 

    

P
R
R
Y
T
 

s
e
 

B
a
i
l
 

S
g
 

e
e
k
 

293 
  

about chines that he was seeking on behalf of the N.A.A.C.P. 

A That 4s right, sir. 

Nn Were there some occasions when you told Mr. LeFlore 

that some of the things he was asking were just more than you 

could provide or secel: as a City Commissioner? 

A Well, in several conversations with him I pointed 

out that TI felt that there were things that the N.A.A.C.P, 

and other organizations were advocating that really from an 

ideal standpoint they were wrong and things that needed to 

be corrected, but as far as the black people in the community 

were concerned, I thought that there were other things much 

more important for them to attain and, therefore, the things 

that would really help them economically and help them to 

obtain johs and a Fuller life were more important than the 

pure ideals of what our government should be. 

n Concerning those things that you thought could not 

be accomplished through the political process, did you ever 

advise Mr. LeFlore that he should try to use the Courts to 

seek re-address of those grievances? 

A In discussing with him, he very much believed in 

legal process and in proper proceeding to obtain the ends that 

our government established on the principal that if we do 

have laws that are in conflict with the constitution and 

denied rights to persons that are guaranteed to them, the 

Par 

    
  

  

  
    107 

-—   
 



  

l
s
 

mi
d 

nH 

  

      
b
o
 

R
O
E
 
R
i
 

B
a
 

“w
t 

st
 

a
 
C
R
T
 

A
 

ER
 

a s
t
l
 

'rolitical campaign we got into in the '60's with the Civil             

places to find re-address is through the Courts and not 

through public violence and things of that nature. 

Ue did many times discuss if changes were needed 

that he should go to Court to bring about those changes. 

The things that we could do within government we 

tried to do, and the things that we felt were issues that 

should be decided by the Courts we advised he should go to 

Court. 

n In any event, you did run successfully for the 

City Commission in 1953? 

A Yes, oir, . 

nN And stayed in office until 1969: that is, four 

terns? 

A Yes, sir. 

n Nid the racial issues surface in any of the election 

until 19697 

A Vell, it came up some in the 1957 election. Of 

course, as the issues grew and time went on and, of course, 

they became much more the focal point of pretty near every 

“ipghts movement and other sctivities and it was brought to 

“he attention of more and more people and people began to 

make thelr decisions based a lot on their position on racial 

anestions. 

    
  

  

decisi. 

lines? 

the faq 

wards 

Mr. Ba! 

A 

here tt} 

Rights 

that ar 

was a 1 

a racis 

nhilosc 

no one 

and, tk 

people 

atandin 

went in 

that th 

     



10t 

he 

1r 

alections 

of   
urse, 

very | 

vil | 

it to 

} to 

racial 

  
  

Q Do you think that the electorate made their 

3 

decisions as between you and Mr. Balley in 1969 along racial 

lines? 

A I think it was a determining factor in the election: 

ves, sir. 

3, The Court has just inquired of the last witness abou 

the fact that there appeared to be a drop-off in the black 

wards in support of you in that 1969 election against 

Mr. Bailey. 

Would you explain vhat happened? 

A Hell, there was an element in the black commmity 

here that became very active about that time in the Civil 

Rights movement in the commmity and they took the attituue 

that anyone who didn't do everything that they wanted done 

was a racist and in their papers they condemmed me for being 

2 racist and they got out and worked to try to -- their 

philosophy became that there is no one in the City Hall or 

no one running for City Commission who is worth voting for, 

and, therefore, don't vote. 

They put on a very active campaign to keep the 

people from voting. As a matter of fact, many people were 

standing in front of the wards taking pictures of people that 

went in and I was told by many people that tried to go vote 

that they were threatened. 

295 ——— om— a ae rm m—————— 

  “ 
t 

| 
| 
| 
| 

  

          ~ 409  



    

    
  
        

  
  

  

  

  

0 Was thie the NOW organization that was associated 

with Nobel Beasley? 

A Yes. 

n Did "er. LeFlore and the non-partisan voters league 

endorse you in that election? 

A Yes. 

g Did they attempt to rally the support of the black 

community for you? 

A Yes. 

Nn Would the Clerk please show Mr. Langan Exhibit 61, 

the Exhibit that we ware looking at a moment ago. 

Plaintiffs' Exhibit 61 is in one exhibit, a large number of 

newspaper articles that we have copied in exchange with the 

Defendants and I would like to try to use them as one 

Txhibit, if there is no objection, just to simplify matters. 

THE. COURT: 

Fine. let's take a fifteen minute break here. 

(Plaintiffs' Exhibit number 61 was received 

and marked, in evidence) 

( RECESS ) 

THE COURT: 

  
  

110 

Your Honor) 

  
  

to this 

organiz 

compare 

thousar 

decreas 

THE COL 

wards ) 

votes, 

ninety- 

       



{ated 

league 

» black 

iit 61, 

our Honor 

ber of 

th the 

atters. 

Ire. 

  

y 

  

  

It was only about seventy-five percent of what voted in 

1265. 

9 And it is also true that the voter turn out in the 

black wards were substantially less than had been expected? 

A Yes. 

n And that was attributed, you said in large part, 

to this boycott that an organization in the black community 

organized? 

A I think that had definite effect on it. of course, 

as I say, the total vote was down from what it had been; it 

was down even more so in the black wards. 

In other words, the wards I just enumerated, 

compared from 19A5, they dropped from six thousand to thro 

thousand some odd votes, about twenty-eight hundred vote 

decrease. 

IE COURT: 

Almost half less? 

4 That's right. 

“IR. ARENDALL: 

Would you give me those figures? 

A In the wards that T enumerated in 1965, in those 

wards I received six thousand four hundred and seventy-nine 

votes. In 1969 I received three thousand six hundred and 

ninety-seven votes. 

  

          111}  



  

  

  
  

    
    

        

hid — 1% ; 
A 

HR. AREMND : 
= ALL MR. BLA 

Thank you. 
y Q 

*fR. BLACF.SHER: 
electios 

i What other factors were, in your opinion, accountablp A 

-- accounted for the total reduction in voter turn out? 
against 

A Well, we had just had the hurricane the day before. THE COU 

I think that accounted for some of the people not voting, 

| plus the fact that I think that there was a certain amount . 

of apathy. More people were satisfied with the operation of "R. BLA 

the City Commission than what they had been in the term A 
\ ‘~ 

Hh ’ ' - etween 61 and '65 Aamilie 

I think there has been a lot of criticism of the A 

operation of the government between the '61 and '65 term A 

and, therefore, more people were interested in bringing about Ta 
out, 

a change where in 1969 they were fairly well satisfied with 5 

| 
ii the governmental operation and, as a consequence, more people abil 
il ry e 

| 20 to the polls to vote against people than what they do 
i across 

i to go to the polls to vote for people. As a consequence, 
| water fs 
I there 1s not a lot of opposition to the people in office and 
| In othe 

| vou won't have as good a turn out as they do when you have that 
i | the cau 

| opposition. 
| 

of peos 
THE COURT: 

their 1 

The interest of change must have not been directed 
debris 

against you in '65. It must have been somebody else? 
le 

112 
f            



  
the 

  ce, 

ce and | 

have that 

| 

ected 

  

       
       
             

MR. BLACKSTER: 

n In fact, Mr. Bailey was your only opposition in the 

election; is that correct? 

A In '69. In '65 there were four or five that ran 

against me, at that time. 

THF. COURT: 

Were any of the incumbents defeated in 1965? 

A Both of them other than myself; yes, sir. 

MR. BLACKSHFR: 

iA The hurricane you are speaking about was Hurricane 
~ 

Camille, of course? 

A Yes. 

0 Explain specifically how that reduced voter turn 

out, in your opinion? 

A Well, it had caused some slight damage around the 

obile area and also a number of people that owned homes 

across the bay had damage from water, damage along the 

waterfront there, and many people had gone over to check. 

In other words, it was the first day they got to go across 

the causeway to check on their property and there were a lot 

of people cleaning up limbs and debris and things around 

their home where the wind and rain and everything caused 

debris. 

     

   
   
   

   
   

  

  

  

   
      

   
   

   

   
   

  

    
   

  

   

  

   

    
   
   

  

        _. 113: 

  

    



    

  
  

  
    

  

    

    
  

rd +o fr 
| I think they berin on page forty-eight and page A 

| forty-nine. 4 Nn 

| A Of courae, there are some write ups there that 1f you hs 

| concern it. The first ad here, it looks like is one of mine A R 

on page or part of one of mine on page forty-six. the numbe 

1 n This {8s your ad? have had 

| A Yes. And then forty-seven is part of my ad and THE COUR. 

forty-eight is an ad of my opponent, yes. 

nN And so is forty-nine? ¥ i 

| i Yas. “HF. COUR’ 

| 0 And fifty? 

A And page fifty. : A 

0 All right, sir. Page forty-nine is an ad that shows TE COUR] 

| vou, a picture next to that of Mr. LeFlore, and says, "Will 

you let this pair run your City for another four years?" the '65 e 

| referring to Mr. LeFlore as a person that was appointed by A 

| you to the Mobile Housing Board? THE COUR] 

{ A Yes. 

| 7 Did that kind of an ad cost you votes in this factor {ir 

i election? 

lA I don't thin! there was any question. It would have Actually : 

| cost me votes in white wards, yes. voter res 
t 

2) You were, for a certainty, during that election, were THT COUR- 

tncoed, as it were, with the black votes; is that correct? 

    se ————————— —— cae 

] = 114 
                       



  

——303 

age 

Rt 

of mine 

  
1d have.   
on, were 

ect? 
mre ich 

| 

      

—
—
—
 

  

  

i!
 

. 
d 

    

A Yes. 

Nn Nevertheless, you say you believe you could have won 

if you had had a solid black turn out? 

A Yes. If the black vote had turned out any where near 

the number that had turned out four years previously I would 

have had a plurality in that election. 

THE COURT: 

Let me ask you a question. 

Yes, sir. 

THF. COURT: 

Now, you started running for City Cormission in 19517 

A rifty-three. 

T-TE COURT: 

Fifty-three. You had two previous elections before 

the '65 election? 

A Yes, sir. 

™E COURT: 

When did the black vote first become a significant 

factor in elections. ; 

4 It was beginning to build up a little bit in S72. 

Actually it was 'fl when they were beginning to put on some 

voter reristration programs. 

THT COURT:   
Do you have any recollection of what the total 
  

MI
R       BE 

e
e
 
a
h
 

ce
d 

Loo
 

115;



      

        

  

    
  

  

“hat had surrounded those communities and, therefore, they 

MHdn't quite vork out. 

Nn Is it fair to sav, on balance, the major factor 

~ontributing to your defeat was the racial issue? 

A That and apathy, the people not voting. 

i Nineteen seventy-two you ran for the County Commissién 

and got into a runoff with Mr. McConnell in the Democratic 

FEimALY, which vou lost, correct? 

A : That's right. 

4 "ould you say that race and racial issues played an 

frnortant role in your defeat there? 

A T think it played an important role. Wowever, you 

had there an entirely different constituency and there were 

many other factors involved in that election. 

In other words, there were many communities in the 

rutlving communities, the City officials of those communities 

T had opposed in trying to work out fiscal matters that 

vould have been te the benefit of the City of Mobile and there 

‘rere areas that T had brought about the annexation to Mobile 

IT had taken the stand that the better and were fearful -- and 

most efficient kind of povernment was a metro form of govern- 

nent, and they were fearful of that and, as a consequence, 

T had a lot of opporition in these commmities that had 

nothin~ narticularly to do with race. 

310 

    116 

  

S
M
H
 

R
U
B
I
N
 

+1 
m
a
 

  

le
 {
 

J
 

A 
pa
r 

  

say, 1 

the na 

Cormmun: 

that hs 

situat- 

isBue ec 

again, 

twenty- 

six, ar 

can you 

A 

of eour 

cut of 

roward 

  

R
r
 
w
e
e
n
 

go
      



  

      

      
  

  
        

311 me |p 
J THE COURT: 

or What year was that election? 

3 illneteen seventy-two. But the racial issue, as I 

say, it was played up and my opponent did use it as one of 

>umission the main thrusts in the campaign and, particularly in these 

2 tic communities I am talking about, many of which were the people 

! that had fled from the Citv to pet away from the racial 

: || situation and it added fuel to the fire. I think the racial 

red an : | issue did play an important role in the campaign. 

; } For the record, if you will look at that Exhibit 61 

you again, pages fourteen, fifteen, sixteen, seventeen, nineteen, 

were i twenty-one, twenty-two, twenty-three, twenty-five and twenty- 

six, and that's all I see relating to Mr. McConnell's ads: 

the can you identify them as ads from that campaign? | 

nities A Yes, sir. As I say, you can see this many of them -t 

of course, a lot of them were just absolutely -- well, taken | 

! there ! cut of context, but, as I say, a lot of them were thrusted 

nhile toward the racial oauestion. 

“ey p low, there was no black boycott of the polls in 

er and 127272 | 

overn- : Ho | 

te. | MN COURT: 

black what? 

MR. BLACHSHER: 

| ek SSE Se 

i 

|   
 



      

    
  

          

  

Boycott, your Uonor. 

How do you distinguish the results in 1969 and 1972? 

A Yell, as ¥ say, T received, within the City, a good 

vote. It was just a question of, as Mr. McConnell here pointed 

out in one of his ads in the first race, in that election 

he enumerates two, four, six, eight of the group of wards that 

I enumerated avhile apo. 

2 As predominantly black? 

A Yes, and in this election against Mr. McConnell IY 

received thirty-seven hundred and twenty-six votes; whereas 

in the '6? race T only received thirty-six ninety-seven in 

all of the black wards, So, as I said, had T potten this 

ind of vote then In the '62 election, it would have made 

the difference. 

f My point is, it didn't seem to do you any good 

in 197227 

Yo. It did not. It was a different kind of 

constituency and it involved other issues and problems I 

had created for mvself In those outlying areas. 

In other words, when I had moved out of the limits 

  

    
of the City of 'obile and brought in that opposition, plus | 

the fear of the people of Chickasaw, Saraland, Satsuma, 

Yount Vernon, Pavou la Ratre, and so forth. In other words, | 

the neople in office down there had felt that I was trving 

      118 
      
  Arr 

i
e
n
   

    

that you 

T puess 

you were 

saying, 

A 

time to 

those ti 

issues s 

changes 

gotten 4 

a good ° 

speaks 

other t 

have be 

wide po 

been an 

as 1 8s



    
  

  
  

            
    

    

| 318 
pe 312 i oi 

that you think you could have won in the City wide race and 

xd 19727 T puess you are saying in this County wide race, even though 

a good you wore tagged with the black vote, is that what you are 

. Pointed saying, other circumstances being different? 

{on A Yes. I would say if we turned back the pages of 

ards that time to when I ran for State Senator, something back in 

those times, when I hadn't been involved in some of these 

issues with the smaller communities and had brought about 

11 I changes that were detrimental to them where I could have | 

ereas gotten any kind of break at all in the County and then with | 

.n in 2 pool vote in the City I could have been elected. | 

‘his n Could a black candidate in a City wide or County 

mde wide race get elected? | 

A Well, so far, they haven't and it is most difficult 

d to see -- I don't know whether circumstances will be chante, 

but so far none has been. | 

| nN You are not willing to express an opinion on it? 

. A Well, I don't think they could. I mean, the cvitents 
| 

speaks for itself. They haven't been. So, I can't conclude | 

imits other than the fact that they couldn't be, because there 

plus | 3 | have been several black candidates who have run for County 

; f | wide position who were iminently qualified and should have 

words, | L ’ | been and could have been elected, but who were not. So, 

ving : | as I say, I feel that the opportunity had been there. 

ee mss fai vq . ae SIGE ET 

—419 |     
 



  

  

    
    

  

There were men, as I say, that were well qualified 

running for school commissioner and things of that nature 

who were not elected and so, therefore, I just feel they 

could not, as yet, be elected in Mobile County. 

THE COURT: 

Mr. Langan, has there been somewhat of a polarizatio 

of votes and is it more or less true or not that with 

polarization that is difficult for black candidates to be 

elected and increasingly difficult for white people to be 

elected in black majorities? 

A Yes. TI think so. As I say, I think it, of course, 

depends a lot on the person. : 

THE. COURT: 

I guess the thrust of my question is has there been 

somewhat of a marked polarization? 

A Yes. I think there has been some break down, 

although, in some of your areas and the schools and younger 

people, there have been blacks that have been -- blacks that 

have been elected in commmities that were mainly white, 

like the University of South Alabama. 

many people out there and I was out ...... 

THE COURT: 

You mean in school volitiecs? 

A Yes, sir. 

  

120 

I mean, there have been   

119 

  

  

   Es Trp
 

” 

  

  

   
THE COR 

A 

think yg 

students 

for the 

year, w 

one res 

shows * 

irrespe 

1fR. BLA 

indicas 

coremm § 

you dic 

black t 

had spe 

when yc 

A 

or 1dec 

do vote 

get or 

  

” 
i
 

ro
R—
      



  

  

     

    

    

    
    

No 320 

14 fied | THE COURT: 

: All right. You expect that to translate into ..... 
ture i 

ey A A + Yes. I think there is a change taking place. I 

4 think possibly Murphy High School is a majority of white 
4 

: students there and yet their president of the student council 
J 

Ei rat ion for the coming year is a black parson £4 the president, last 

year, was a white person. I spoke at the change over from 
3 

, ba i one regime to the other and, as I say, there, I think, {it 
£ 

Ba : shows that the students are willing to elect a person 

J irrespective of their race. 

i MR. BLACKSWER: 
ourse, i : 

3 3) Mr. Langan, I don't want the record to seem to 
: : 
4 indicate that the non-partisan voters league in these black 

e bash | commmities in general supported you just because of what 

i you did in the 1949 legislature for equalizing the pay of the 

f black teachers. 

; Were there specific issues that you supported that 
nger | 

3 that had special uphill to the black commmities during the '60's | 

. when you were a City Commissioner? 

A Well, I think no matter whether it is a psychological 
ave been 

or ideological or economic benefit, I think most people 

‘10 vote for people because of something that either they 

! { get or something they do. 
i ; 

| I think, of course, that there were many people in 

| i |= — 
iris m—ce 18 5 121+       
 



  

  

  

  
  

  
  

  

            

ae: | BE — 321 =a 

the black commmity that voted for me, because while I was A 

in the City Commission wa paved many streets in black Q 

neluliborkioods vho never had a paved street before and put you wen 

water and sewer service in those areas that didn't have it A 

before and parks in those areas that didn't have parks my aski: 

hefore. I think there are many things that happened or p other g- 

that we had pledged ourselves to do that brought about a vote } the per 

in those commmities. ; : T was on 

0 Were you consistently endorsed by the non-partisan 9 

voters league and, of course, they didn't come on the scene league? 

until when, as an organization? 1 A 

A - Well, it was on up in the latter part of the expense: 

'50's before they really became real active. As I say, they : bution 1 

had participated before, of course, but they didn't have the i Q 

strength. i for the 

There hasn't been many black voters in the A 

commmity due to the restrictions on registration and other :o 1 

things and it was only after some of those things were voters 

‘broken down and they were free to get registered to vote, : san use 

nN What about the so called pink ballot? When did A 

that first appear? I would 

A I don't know exactly when. : the blac 

n Were you ever endorsed -- you were, weren't you, 0 

on the pink ballot? : influenc 

122 : | 
;    



‘tisan 

scene 

» they 

ve the 

other 

ta, 

id 

  

i
y
 

f
a
i
m
 

%- 

  

T
S
 

ET
 

AC
R 

PI
I 

322 
  

A : Yes. 

8] Can you describe to the Court the process that 

you went through to ask for and obtain that endorsement? 

A Well, I didn't ask for it. They endorsed me without 

my asking for it and they, just like the newspapers or 

other groups, they set up a ballot on which they marked 

the person that they felt should be elected to office and 

T was one of those that were on the ballot. 

0 Did you contribute to the non-partisan voters 

league? 

A I paid a contribution to them to help pay the 

expenses. In fact, they told me 1if I would make a contri- 

bution they would appreciate it and I did. 

Q And it was your understanding that it was made 

for the printing and the distribution of the ballots? 

A That's right. 

n How effective, in your opinion, was the non-partisan 

voters league and its pink ballot in delivering -- if we 

can use that word -- in delivering the black vote in Mobile? 

A Well, it is difficult to say how effective it was. 

I would say that generally whoever's name were on there withis 

the black commmity obtained an outstanding vote. 

0 Vas there a period of time when that -- when the 

influence of the pink ballot was greater than at others? 

1 

  
    
  

    

S
r
 
—
   1237 -—  



  

    

  

A I think in the early days of voter registration and 

all and before the Civil Rights movement really got into a 

big SHINE. UD in the middle sixties, I think that it had -- 

the older Mobilians and the people in the black community that 

iinew each other and lived here together and they worked real 

closely together and they were very effective. 

As I say, as time went on and you had some of the 

young people and other people from out of town that got into 

the black community and began thelr own agitating and their 

own small groups, I think they began to split up its 

effectiveness, berause you had a certain amount of split off 

among some of the younger black people in the community. 

0 I think you have referred earlier to the fact that 

incumbents were having problems generally, at one point, 

in the sixties? 

A As I said, usually people will po to the polls and 

vote against somebody. In other words, they will be against 

an incumbent and, therefore, they will gc to the polls and | 

vote, because they have antipathy towards somebody where, 

otherwise, if they are pretty well satisfied with the way 

government is going or if there is nobody particularly 

involved -- in fact, that sheet I had a moment ago with 

regard to the 1969 election. In that election there were 

  

  

li
e 
F
k
 

D
y
 

——
——

——
 

b
a
o
 ho
 d

as
e 
C
Y
 

2d
 

Y
d
 

Ee 
Fy 

ha
se
 

     

      121°   
  

after hs 

truth, & 

as follec 

and live 

two chil 

and Tusk 

County al 

is that c 

       



  

      

  
  

  

    
            

1 | Tra 360 ihn rh ei 
{ : THE COURT: 

intel You gentlemen might want to stipulate to that or 

: study it and come up with some other figures. 

nity that All right. Whom will you have next? 
od Yel MR. MENEFEE: 

; Mrs. Lonia Gill. 

F the i 

>t into LONIA M. GILL 

their the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and 

: after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, the whole 

it off 1 truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and testified 
v as follows: 

that ¢ 

t. 5 | ' DIRECT EXAMINATION 
I: RY MR. MENEFEE: 

s and : 0 This is Mrs. Lonia M. Gill, fifty-eight years old 

gainst and lives at 2854 Whitlar Street and married and mother of 
ind two children. She attended Mobile County Training School 

re; and Tuskegee Institute. She has been a resident of Mobile 

way County all of her life. fig 

She is executive secretary of the A.M.E. Zion Church; 

h i is that correct, Mrs. Gi11? 

ere | & That's right. 
8 
g 

rig 17s: 

¥   
 



  

A Some of the campaign literature? 

0 Yes, ma'am. 

A Yes. 

0 © And Mr. Alexander's carried his? 

A Yes. 

0 Do you think it is a fair statement to say that 

Mr. Alexander is known as an opponent of busing and an 

associate of Governor Wallace? 

A Yes. Sure. 

0 Mrs. Gill, is it fair to say that most of your 

support in that election came from the black community? 

A . I can't say that in the runoff. I don't know that 

rost of it did or not. I really don't know, because I feel 

that 1 was sibpareed by both, but naturally I am sure that 

most of them came from blacks, I believe. 

0 Mrs. Gill, about how much money did you spend in 

your school board race? 

A I don't have the figures with me. It couldn't have 

heen too much, because I didn't have too much. I just had 

enough to take care of all of my obligations. 

n You are talking about maybe a couple of thousand 

dollars? 

A Well, something like that. Perhaps two thousand 

dollars, if that much. 

      1<6         

       

   
   

    

    

H 
8 
4 

» 

5 
EH 

public 

A 

Q 

campaign 

whether 

communi: 

A 

when yon 

since tl 

tion org 

A 

Mobile E 

Q 
       



at 

| in 

t have 

. had 

and 

.and 

  

          

364 
      

lloublic service? 

Ye
 
A
 

R
R
R
 
R
E
 

nN : I see. Did you use any radio or television ads? 

A I did. I was on radio and television quite a bit. 

This was why I can say no oie really had to wonder who I was. 

n Did you have to pay for those spots or were they 

A No. They was donations from friends. 

0 I see. Do you have an opinion as to whether your 

campaign created much interest in the black community and 

whether you received substantial support within the black 

community? 

A I think it ereated quite a bit of interest. Now, 

when you say in the community, do you mean the County communit 

since this was a County race? 

0 Yes, within the County. 

A Within the County commumity. I think it did, but 

not as much as it should have, but it did create quite a bit 

of interest. 

p) Were you endorsed by the non-partisan voters league? 

A Yes, I was. 

4, Did you receive endorsement from the voters registra- 

tion organization? 

A Yes, I did. Would you allow me to say that even the 

Mobile Press Register endorsed me. 

Q From your experience, do you have an opinion as to 

Y » 

      i UL  



  

  

    
  

— 1363 

whether or not a black running, at large in the community in 

Mobile County, has a reasonable chance of winning an election 

against a qualified white opponent? How would you describe thp 

chance of a black citizen? 

A Personally, Mr. Menefee, I would think that the chancps 

would be very slim, really. 

Q Would you also have that opinion for running at large 

in the City of Mobile? > 

A Yes, sir. 

0 Do you see a great deal of difference in terms of the 

racial issue betwsen Mobile County and Mobile City? 

A It is almost equal. I have had a. chance to cover 

the County even before the race, and I have known the City, 

I don't see very much difference you know, all of my life. 

in the County and the City. 

N Do you know Dr. E. B. Goode? 

A Yes, sir. 

0) Dr. W. L. Russell? 

A Yes, I do. 

Q And Mrs. Jackie Jacobs? 

A Yes. 

Q These were three previous candidates for the school 

board and received substantial support from the black 

community. Were they well known in the black commmity? 

            128   
  
  
    

    

  

n Al 

against a w 

A Ye 

nN Dc 

or Mr. O1l1lf{ 

\ Nc 

4, Tt 

TY 
nE 

the previos 

A I 

don't know 

really don 

3 ME 

cwenty-fiv 

‘obile Cows 

a black cos 

ind of mc 

A B 

could rails 

twenty-fiw 

A E 

matter. 

    
R
E
 

   



  

y in 

ction 

ibe thp 

chances 

- large 

of the 

rer 

-ty, 

ance 

chool   

[363 

  

  

Job 
  

  

I would think so. 

Db} All three of those candidates also gained a runoff 

against a white ODDORERE, just as you did? 

A Yes, sir. 

n Do you know a Mr. Alphonso Smith, Mrs. Lula Albert 

or Mr. Ollie Lee Taylor? 

\ Not personally, but I know of them. 

0 They ran for the City Commission in 1973. 

were they as well known in the black community as 

the previous list of blacks, black school board candidates? 

A I can't say yes or no to that, simply because I 

don't know that. Because I don't know everybody, but I 

really don't believe that they are. 

:wenty-five thousand dollars to run a credible race for the 

‘tobile County Commission or the City Commission, do you think 

a black candidate, would be black candidate, could raise that 

ind of money and would enter the race? 

| A I don't know. 1 doubt seriously if a black candidat 

| could raise that kind of money, thirty thousand dollars or 

twenty-five thousand dollars. 

N Would you be willing to undertake a race? 

A Not County wide or City Commission either, for that 

matter. 

  
              

  
¥ Mrs. Gill, if it was necessary to raise approximate. 

  
| 

el 

  
 



a
h
 

i 
a 
s
s
 

1 
\ 

1 
t 

{ 
| 

| 

! 1 

i 
h 

| 

| 

Dr
ie
 

ke
 

TA
GE
 
n
T
 

RG
 

na
an

 
b
t
 

  

  

  

) All right. What else? 

A) After that, well, we dealt with Judge W. Brevard 

land, TI think. TI happen to have served as chairman of that 

bi-racial advisory board. I have served in Mobile City as   !fobile County wide president of the P.T.A. and then served 

is a Mobile County wide president of the P.T.A. and then was 

clected State president of the P.T.A. and I have served on   
i! 
| 
LH 

H 
i 
H 
{ 

l 
ol 

i 
" 

- 

» 

‘a 
i 

Ph 
it) 

it 

ne 
3 4 
iH 

{ 

He 

ih: 

i! 

! 

';o many committees. 

I have worked for the City of Prichard, having been 

appointed the first black department head as director of the 

lcommmity development program in the City of Prichard, and 

rhe member of the board of adjustment. I was also a member 

'f the board of advisory committee out there in Prichard and 

ne of the trustees of the formerly sixth district hospital 

hen it closed. It was the Keller Memorial Hospital and it 

‘as just any number of things associated with Mobile or with 

‘'obile County. 

I could go on and on. I am not a newcomer. I have 

een in Mobile and Mobile County all of my life and a lot of 

eople know me. 

And you have a substantial support of whites in your 

ace, did you not? 

I think I did. TI really believe I did, not being in 

+ position to actually know how many votes I got, but I believe D 

  

. 430   
RN
 

E
—
—
 

  

  
J E
h
 

4 

   

    

’ 4 pees 
B 

THE COURT = 

MR. MENEFY 

Koffler n= 

  
truth, th 

stand and 

BY MR. ME 

Q 

Rocheste: 

She atte: 

Universi 

gince 19 

         



    

    
  

  

  
  

    
  

  

          

  

Stina GE 
311. 

A ; No, Mr. Menefee. 

ard : MR. MENEFEE: 

that oy That's all. 

7 as © ||THE COURT: 

ved 
You may come down. 

n was | ~~ IMR. MENEFEE: 

| on Your Honor, we would like to call Mrs. Jerre 

Koffler next. 

been 

f the 
JERRE KOFFLER 

and the ltnies; having first been duly sworn to tell the 

mber truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the 

i and stand and testified as follows: 

[tal 

1c DIRECT EXAMINATION 

with BY MR. MENEFEE: 

Q This is Mrs. Jerre Koffler. She resides at 4208 

have Rochester Road and is married and the mother of two children. 

t of She attended the University of Alabama, Springhill College, 

University of South Alabama, and has lived in Mobile County 

your since 1954 and presently employed at public relations counsel. 

Mrs. Koffler, is that correct? 

ng in A That's right. 

believe Q Mrs. Koffler, did you run for the school board in 

    
            
 



  

  

  

    

              

lm 3 

A That's right. example, : 

Q Mrs. Koffler, down at the bottom, would you describe to achiev 

the layout of the ad at the bottom? A ' 

A At the bottom. That is May 2nd block vote, names Court. I 

the wards, and there are four candidates listed there. integrati 

Q What is the import of that? What is the ....... signed by 

A "I think it is trying to show that certain block areas to start 

that the candidates who have the most votes got ‘the black vote with anyb 

and the candidates that have the less amount of votes. 0 

0 You were one of the candidates that got some of the to ease t 

most votes in a black area? A 

A Yes, sir. : TR. AREND 

0 Can you tell me something of your relationship with 

the black community or education in the Mobile area? Why did awfully f 

you receive such support from the black community? THE COURT 

A Well, I guess it was because I was willing to see if 

there was some way we could make the April Supreme Court with blac 

decision work in Mobile County. I was anxious for the school I don't ¢t 

board to get on with the business of educating the children MR. MENEF 

and not fighting a losing battle against the Supreme Court of 

the United States. And I believe that was coincided with what 0 

these blacks wanted to dc’ and what a number of whites wanted receive 

to do. : A 

0 Do you have some comments to make on -- well, for 0 

7332      



ma8cribe 

Emme s 

>f the 

> with 

Jhy did 

see if 

-t 

school 

dren 

urt of 

th what 

ranted 

for 

  

  

i IR. ARENDALL: 

lawfully far afield here. 

  

376 
  

example, in this ad number one "Signed agreement with N.A.A.C.P. 

to achieve total integration and total busing’? 

A : That was one of the things that I tried to take to 

Court. I did not sign any agreement to achieve total 

integration or total busing, nor do I think any agreement 

signed by anyone would be any different, whether it meant 

to start busing or stop busing. I did not sign any agreement 

with anybody. 

0 Would you describe some of your activities in trying 

to ease this integration process, please, ma'am? 

A Can I take a few minutes to go through that? 

If your Honor please, it seems to me we are going 

THE COURT: 

Yes. The thing you are showing is some identificatioc 

with blacks, a racial factor. It would be interesting, but 

I don't think that would be a great deal of help. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Okay, sir. 

0 Mrs. Koffler, during the 1972 campaign, did you 

receive any threatening phone calls? 

A Yes, I did. 

0 Was this a common occurrence? 

Apt 
      
  

      133    



  

  

  

  

  

  

          

- —ti 
§ 
lla A I would get phone calls in the middle of the night 2 
E. A 

saying, "Where is your nigger loving wife?", and my husband ¥ 

penerally answered this, because I got a number of Shreatentng § 2 

3 opinion = 
calls of that same kind and he would say, "She is sound 

: in Mobile asleep”, and that would stop that, but that went on for 

A about three months. 

y in my pa: 
Q Mrs. Koffler, is it fair to say that race was a 

. cireumnsts 
najor issue in your campaign? 

May race 
A I would think so. 

n Do you think the term, "block vote has racial 

specific 
connotations as used in Mobile County politics? 

run into 
A As used in this particular ad, I would say it did. 

| Q Q Tagging you with a block vote and certain racial 

white cas 
identification? 

A 
A I would think so, ’ 

depends « 
n Mra. Koffler, have you been active in other political 

campaigns? 

It can b. 
A Through my work and prior to my work, yes, sir. 

. 5 that doe 
0 Would you describe the period of time in which you 

Q have been active in these political campaigns? 
“A 

A I think the first real political experience I had 

Q wae the Brewer - Wallace governor's race, and then, in my 

A 
school board, and then I went to work right soon after that 

Q and we have handled some political clients in our work. 

a vn 0%          



    

  

  
    

A A 4 EE ad ].378 

aight | Q " As recently as this past May? 

.sband : A Yes, 

catenin £ Q Mrs. Koffler, from your experience, do you have an 

d ¥ opinion as to the prevalence of race as a campaign issue 

" 4 in Mobile County, Mobile City politics; is it a major factor? 

A That is a hard question to answer. I would say that, 

a in my particular race, it was a big factor, because of the 

3 circumstances. I noticed a little bit of- it in this last 

| May race. ; 

I think that if a candidate addresses himself to a 

specific black issue that he is liable to or she is liable to 

did. run into a little bit of race politics. 

al Q Is it always a potential issue even between two 

white candidates, if the candidates want to play on that? 

A I can't say that it is always a potential issue. It 

11tical depends on what the issues are. 

If the issues are that such it causes a rift, yes. 

It can be kind of potent. There are many races, I guess, 

you that doesn't have any kind of racial discrimination in them. 

Q What is your religion, Mrs. Koffler? 

ad A I am Jewish. 

y Q Was that an issue in your campaign? 

hat A No, it was not. 

Q Do you know whether -- from your experience, has 

iE            



  

  

  

  

religion been an issus in cempaigns? 

A I have never come across it. 

Q What about campaigns exploiting possibly national 

origin, against ethnic groups, was that ever an issue in 

Mobile County politics as you have observed? 

A The only ethnic issue that I have come across is the 

black - white. There might be some, but I just don't know 

about it. . 

Q Is there any issue in Mobile County politics that 

you have observed in recent years that has the pervasive 

effect that race has? 

A Unless it would be crooked politics. 

Q Do you think race will also be an issue if a black 

candidate runs against a white in our present situation? 

A I would like to eay I wish it weren't, and I hope it 

isn't and that we have outgrown it, but from a few things 

that happened in the May primary, I don't believe we have 

yet gotten to the point where we can say race is never an 

issue. | 

Q What sort of thing did you see in the past primary? 

A There was another block vote against a candidate that 

was run in the paper. 

Q What race was that? 

A , It was one of the District Court Judge races. 

          

    

Q 

A 

Q 

with tt 

A 

0 

A 

I saw c 

where 1 

because 

have or 

papers 

Q 

past Me 

A 

Q 

white t 

the ble 

becomes 

concert 

A 

a liabi 

Q 

May an) 

         



onal 

hat 

380 
        

{lpapers they were run in. 

Q " Was that in the Loveless - Kearney race? 

A Yes, it was. 

Q Was there an attempt to tag one of the candidates 

with the block vote? 

A Yes, sure was. 

0 Where were those ads run? 

A I saw, and this is a rather funny place to see it, 

I saw one in the Mobile Beacon and I believe one was -- some- 

where right in the County newspaper. I am being evasive, 

because I was out of town for a week of the runoff and I 

have only seen them clipped and I am not really sure which 

Q Do you know of any other racial campaigning this 

past May? 

A No, I don't. 

Q Mrs. Koffler, to what extent or how directly can 

white politicians address issues of particular concern to 

the black community? Is there a certain point in which it 

becomes a political liability to speak of issues of particular 

concern to blacks? 

A Yes. I would think, at a certain point, it could be 

a liability. 

Q Can you give me any examples of perhaps this past 

May any of the candidates who might have addressed issues of 

            
  
    1373



i 
% 

¥ 

2 3 

  

A Never specifically. In fact, I don't recall ever 

meeting with a non-partisan voters league member, per se. 

Q Did you make any contribution eo the non-partisan 

voters league? 

A No, I did not. ; 

Q How would you describe the chances of a black 

candidate would have running, at large, in Mobile County and 

Mobile City against credible white opposition? 

A Well, in my opinion, it would be kind of a rough 

race for them. 

0 If you felt that your chances were similar, would 

yoo run? . 

0 I don't think so; no. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

That is irrelevant. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

4 What is your estimate of and experience of running 

for the Mobile City Commission under the present, at large, 

system? , 

A I can only tell you what it cost for me to run and 

I would imagine to run for the City Commission it cost me 

five thousand dollars. So, I would say to run a credible 

race for City Commission would cost anywhere between ten 

thousand and on up. I am sure there are some candidates that 

      
                    

; 138   

  

E
o
 

ci
s 

M
I
T
 

N
S
N
 

e
e
 

Q 

has the 

ment he: 

City bo. 

their r 

One min 

it is 6 

Exhibit 

that ha 

of disc: 

admissi 

Defenda 

THE COU 

THE COU 

members 

MR. BLA 

  

  
C
R
E
T
E
.
 
W
T
      



and 

1d 

Ing 

ze, 

  

  

  
  

- 392 
  

  

p
e
a
 

To
 

B
i
e
 

of 
i 

an
d 

Lf
 

Pr 
N 

: 
” 

ko
e 

’ 
pe 

" 
p 

w
i
 
ag

 
B
T
A
 

de
 
N
E
T
 

RA 
EL 

S
o
 

Cy
 

E
e
 

T
L
 

CR
 

B
I
T
 
S
w
 

F
R
R
 

Ld
 

5 
i 

£ix
 

; 
& 

’ 
g 

o
r
o
 

R
E
 
R
E
 

A
 

BS
 

T
R
 

Le
 

A 
Ff 

A 
SF 

S
e
,
 
Pi
 
S
e
 

5 
El
 

FA
SE
 
S
E
 L
i
 

ee
r,

 
I 

RL 
ARN

E 
ee

 
FH
 

7
 

Fag 
2
 

Q | During the time that you have familiar with it, 

has the non-partisan voters league complained to the govern- 

ment here in Mobile that blacks aren't appointed to various 

City boards and committees in fair numbers according to 

their representation in the population? 

A Yes, sir. 

dR. BLACKSHER: 

Would the Clerk show the witness Exhibit 677 

One minute, please. I have the wrong Exhibit. I am sorry, 

it is 64. 

Your Honor, what we have here in Plaintiff's 

Exhibit 64 is the summary of the City committee appointments 

that have been provided us by the defendants in the course 

of discovery proceedings. I would like to move its 

admission in its present form having been exchanged with the 

Defendants. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

(Plaintiff's Exhibit 64 was received and 

marked, in evidence) 

THE COURT: 

Let me ask you a question about this, you have total 

members and total prior members. Can you explain that? 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

  

E
e
   Cua AR.     139°  



  

Q I am talking about the league. 

A The league -- well, many of them...... 

Q Isn't it a fact, Reverand Hope, in the course of 

your connection with the league, its endorsement has been 

actively sought by candidates over the years that you have 

been connected with it?      
  

  
A "Yes, sir. Definitely so. 1 explained that to start 

with. 

Q And wasn't that true in the last City Commission 

race in 19737 

A Yes, sir. 

candida 
Q Every candidate in the race sought your endorsement, 

: A 
didn't they? 

Q 
A I believe all of them did. 

race th 
Q And were anxious to have as many black votes as they 

A 
could get, weren't they? 

0 
A Yes, sir. 

| A 
Q And over the years your success in getting black votes 

to go along with league endorsements has been proved by the 
¥ 

efforts of candidates to get your endorsement, isn't it? 

A Yes. To a certain extent. 

Q All right. Now, did I understand you to say that 

what the league did was to try to endorse only people whom, 

in their judgment, would represent all people, black or white? 

140 
  

  

-—                  



  

    

          

Lid 

A " Yes, sir. 

Q In your opinion, has the league endorsed only such 

people? 
of 

A In my opinion, they has; yes, sir. 
= en : 

9) So, in your opinion, every candidate the league 
“ave 

has endorsed would have been, if elected, a fair representative 

of both black and white? 
D> start 

A That was our motive. 

Q Is that your opinion of the facts? 
Hon 

A Yes, sir. 

Q Now, then, you have had notable success in electing 

candidates that the league has supported, have you not? 
Bement, 

A Yes, in some instances. 

£1Q Now, as a matter of fact, in the Greenough - Bailey 

‘||race the league originally supported Bailey, didn't they? 
mg they 

A No, sir. 

0 Who did they support? 

A Didn't they support Mr. Greenough? 
nck votes 

Q Well, let's put it this way -- I can't answer your 
y the 

question. 
Et? Sr 

Let me ask you this. Didn't the black vote in effect 

put Gary Greenough in office? 
that 

A I wouldn't say the black vote alone, sir. 
whom, 

THE COURT: 
r white? 

«14%   
 



  

Was it the differenca? 

A I beliave ro. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Wan it also the difference in the Mims race?! Could 

Mims have been elected without it? 

A Well, that vas the reason we endorsed them, in order 

that we would support those men who we felt would represent 

all of the people and then those who we endorsed we would 

ask the league to support them, but remember, the league 

didn't always support wholeheartedly who we endorsed. 

Q I think you had better explain what you just said 

to me. Did I understand you to say that the league didn't 

support wholeheartedly support or was it the blacks? 

A The blacks, 

Q In the last race Mr. Doyle didn't have opposition, 

did he? 

A No, sir. 

Q So, there wasn't any question there of solicitation? 

A No, sir. 

9) Now, you were talking about the inability of blacks 

over the last six or eight years getting elected in the 

County wide races. 

  

    

Q 

did you 

voters 

interes 

A 

Q 

A 

I think 

carryim 

all pec 
  

  

            _ 142      



tation? 

blacks 

  

  

417 
  

No further questions. 

THE COURT: 

Will you put witnesses on just what you have been 

over the composition in the appointing authorities? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Yes, sir. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

One question, your Honor, that I would like to clear 

up. 

THE COURT: 

Go ahead. 

REDIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q Reverand Hope, in answering Mr. Arendall's questions), 

did you mean to say that every candidate that the non-partisan 

voters league has endorsed has turned out to represent the 

interest of the black commmity fairly? 

A In reeent years they have. 

Q How recent do you mean when you say recent years? 

A In this last election and maybe the election prior. 

I think, in my opinion, they have done a very good job in 

carrying out their obligations toward tryin to be fair to 

all people. 
            1453  



  

  

    

  

            

—{ 41) 

Q Is that your opinion or the opinion of the entire 

THE CO! 
league? 

A Yes. That is the opinion -- that is what I am trying 

to speak for. They feel that the candidates that they have 

elected here in recent years has done a very good job along 

that line. 

Q Reverand Hope, has the non-partisan voters league 
; Plainti 

ever sought to encourage or to file a. candidate of their 
the tru 

own from the black commmity ...... i 2 
|| the sta 

MR. ARENDALL: . 

Objection, not in rebuttal. 4 
: 

THE COURT: ; 

I will let him ask him. Ey TM, 

A I beg your pardon, sir. oo Q 

THE COURT: (cl =n 

You may answer. : | has fou 

A It has been very far between. We haven't had too bod has liv 

many candidates who are black to run. I would think because tor of 

they felt that they didn't have a chance to win, but we the Mob: 

Mr. LeFlore, he ran, himself, I believe for the Senate. Not 9 hood, wl 

He 

that I believed that he believed that he was going to win g& that an 

the race, but to encourage blacks to prepare themselves or > A 

run for these different offices. : Q 

MR. BLACKSHER:  {.Joun the 

i: 7+ 3  



too 

=cause 

  

  
  

419 
  

That's all, your Honor. 

THE COURT: 

You may come down, Reverand. 

. Whom will you have next? 

JAMES SEALS 
  

the witness, having been called on behalf of the     Plaintiffs, and after having first been duly sworn to tell   
the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took 

the stand and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

Q This is Mr. James Seals. He is forty-eight years 

old. He lives at 404 Palmetto Street. He is married and 

has four sons and holds a masters in music education. He 

has lived in Mobile County all of his life. He is =n instruc 

tor of music at Bishop State Junior College and he works with 

the Mobile Jazz Festival and has been active in his neighbor- 

hood, which is often called "Down the Bay Neighborhood'; is 

that an accurate statement, Mr. Seals? 

A Yes, it is. 

Q Mr. Seals, have you spent most of your life in the 

down the bay neighborhood? 

T 

      145 i  



  

A Well, it has been a problem since this -- around 

'69 or '68. That is when the renewal started, I believe. 

Q Still no remedy to that problem? 

A I don't know if it is being resolved, at this time, 

or not. 

Q Mr. Seals, in the course of our conversation the 

other day you mentioned that you voted at all Saints 

> 

Episcopal Church? 

A Yes. 

Q Is this a predominantly white church? 

A Yes, ie is. 

Q As a black person, have you ever felt any reluctance 

in voting there or have members of your family or community? 

A Well, I don't feel reluctance now, because I guess 

I have gotten use to the idea because of all of my places 

of voting. First I voted on Pillans Street at the VFW and now 

on Ann Street and all of the places I have voted since 1 

have been voting have been predominantly white places and 

I guess I have gotten use to the idea. 

Q Do you think it deters some of the people in your 

neighborhood? 

A I would imagine it deters some in going to a 

predominantly white place like that. 

0 Has the increased presence of black poll workers 

          146 -—     

  

  

- and the: 

that th 

about g 

if they 

is a re 

Q 

neighbo 

organiz 

tion. 

in your 

candida 

circums 

A 

Q 

A 

Q 

A 

Q 

A 

don't t 

       



=md 

Ehe 

ictance 

amity? 

Juess 

~es8 

and now 

I 

and 

Four 

  

  
  

- and they did feel that since the poll watchers were mixed 

made voring in recent years ~-- made the voting facilities 

seem more available and attractive to black citizens? 

A Yes. I have spoken to some of the people in my area 

that they had more ease and they felt a little differently 

about going to the polls, because people generally feel that 

if they go places where they are not mamy of their kind ther: 

is a reluctance about going. 

n One last point. You have been active in your 

neighborhood for some time and a leader in your community 

organization and void expressed interest to me in this litiga- 

tion. : 

Do you think if single member districts were created 

in your neighborhood that you might offer yourself as a 

candidate for City council or City Commission under certain 

circumstances? 

A If it was changed? 

0 Yes, sir. 

A Yes, sir. I do feel that I would. 

Q You wouldn't under the present system? 

A No. 

Q Why? 

A Because it would be very difficult to win and I 

don't think that I would like to sit myself as a loser from 

431 

            1471



  

  

    

0] Not all of that being City money?! A great deal of 

it being Federal money, vasn't it? 

A Right. 

Q And by and large the Mobile Housing Board since it 

is ho recipient of the Federal funds, is subject to the 

overriding suthority of their Federal authorities, is it not? 

A Yes. 

Q Now, I believe you have told us that you had been 

to the City Commission cone or more times in connection with 

problems you have in your area; is that correct? 

A \ Several times. 

9) Which commissioners have you met with? | 

A With our present commissioners, I have met with all 

three. 

Q And the previous cormisaion, with whom did you meet? 

A Each tire that our dalegates went before the 

cormissioners, all three cormissioners were present. 

Q About how many times would you say that your delegat 

has been down to the City Hall and met with the commissioners 

since May of 19671? 

A At least four times since 1967. 

Q And they hava been readily available to you to meet 

with your delegation, haven't they? You had no difficulty in 

getting heard? 

          : _ 148. 

fon 

  
  

a 
ie
 

bad 
P
y
 

    

  

  

A 

Q 

have actu 

accomplis 

drainage? 

A 

Q 

A 

it was ma 

THE COURT 

mentionir 

we were € 

that #52 

and the C 

been done 

and divosxs 

Q 
  

3 R
e
 

   



1 of 

ep it 

> not? 

with 

1 all 

meet? 

=] egat 

loners 

Lon 

  

434 
  

  

  

A We had no difficulty at the meetings, no. 

Q With the exception of this matter with the park, you 

have actually accomplished everything that you had sought to 

accomplish except a part of the area has some problem with 

drainage? 

A The park and the schools, there were two. 

Q Well, the schools are subject to Judge Hand's order. 

A Well, you see, we were involved in that survey and 

it was made of the down the bay area. 

THE COURT: : 

I think you can forget the school. That is out of 

the City's hands on a petition from the black people. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

0 “As to the mrk, didn't I understand you to say that 

you now feel that you have encugh people down there to actual 

get built the park that is part of the major plan? 

A But it is very difficult to discuse the park without 

mentioning the school, because it comprises one big area and 

we were told that the vhole area was owned by the housing boa 

that the school board was suppose to purchase one part of it 

and the City the other and, to our knowledge, this has not 

been done. So, it is very difficult to talk about the park 

and divorce the school when it is one large acreage. 

Q Well, let's try to do that, because there isn't 

          T4149 
—- 

 



Lee 

i 18 

) 
| 
{3 

A 
en 

SA
RS
 

RA
S 

2 
0 

8 S
S
E
   

  

  

anything, Mr. Seals, that the City Commission can do about 

that, or even tha school board can do about that. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

If your Honor please, I object to counsel charac- 

terizing that point. We will be glad to submit to you briefs 

providing you what the legal situation is. I understand we 

don’t want to get into it in detail, but I object to that 

characterization. : ; 

THE COURT: 

Wall, it m~y be that the position that the City 

takes in that other h-aring, but I think we will have to 

take judicial knowledge that the City, by itself, cannot 

do anything. It is subject to this Court's order. 

Vhatever explanation you want and I am certainly 

not going to try that case. Thank goodness that is not mine. 

But the City Commissioners hands -- I think we have to 

recognize is tied to a large extent by the action of the 

Court in that law suit, 

Now, if you want to show somes discriminatory purpose 

or motive that the City had in that suit, I want you to feel 

free to do it, so far as it relates to the park. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

As a matter of fact, Mr. Seals, the City of Mobile 

doesn't run any schools any where, does it? 
      

  

  

‘owners 

that 1 

school 

it is 

bs
 

Q 

lot of 

draine 
        T1150  



about 

marac- 

pu briefs 

and we 

that 

=ity 

* purpose 

to feel 

Mobile 

  

          

    
     
  
         

       
        
     

      

      
    

‘ownership the land that was taken for the school site. See, 

VE Ld SEAR 

A No. The City does not. 

Q That is done by the Mobile County School Board? 

A That's right, but there is another problem, if I 

Q Sure. Go ahead. 

A The housing board now wants to sell to private   that is another problem, because the land was taken for a 
| 

school site and now if it is resold for private owners, 1 think 

it is unfair. 

| 

| 
Q That is the housing board and that isn't the City | 

Commission and that is subject to Federal supervision, ien't 
| 

A I guess so. | 

Q Have you made any representations to HUD or HEW? | 

A Just the housing board. 

n And what response did you get from the housing boned? 

A The action is still pending on it. | 

Q They have to take it up with Atlanta first, I chink, 

don't they, and then Washington? | 

{ 

| 
Q All right. Now, as to drainage, drainage in a whole 

A More than likely.    

  

lot of parts of Mobile, to your knowledge, have problems with 
   

drainage, don't they? 

  

          irr |   



A 
R
E
N
 

Ge
 

et
 

e
t
 

S
l
 
R
d
 

w
e
e
r
 

T 

  

RT
E 

et
 

TE
 

NE
 

Lr
 

SO
 J
 

  

  

  

A I would suppose so. 

a Are you aware of the on going efforts of the City 

of Mobile to effectuate a major drainage program? 

A Yes, I am. 

Q Is it fair to say, than, that you really not only 

have had access to tha City Commission and have been heard 

by them as to every matter that you have sought to bring to 

their attention, but that with the essentials .of the park 

to whatever extent tha City has control over that, that i» 

the only thing that you haven't gotten vhat you wanted; is 

that right? 

A Hell, in my case, yes. . 

Q Thera are, as you said to us, black and white poll 

watchers at all Saints Church, are there not? 

A There are. 

MR, ARENDALL : 

No further questions. 

THE COURT: 

Any further questions? 

MR. MENEFEE: 

No, sir. 

THE COURT: 

All right. You may come down. 

Whom will you have next? 

      
  

  

  

  
  

  

I am 

testif 

They h 

THE CO 

to and 

questi 

The Con 

tions - 

witness 

limit c 

tell tt 

took tl} 

BY MR. 

J. 

Everett 

of Mobi 

the Uni 

North T 

         



p City 

~e poll 

  

441 
  

I am going to put Dr. Voyles on as a witness and let him 

testify and he will be subject to full cross dxsuination. 

They have his chests and it speaks for itself. 

THE COURT: 

Well, he has the right to call anycody that he wants 

to and limit -- really, now, under the Federal rules, the 

question of wvouching for a witness is about out the window. 

The Court takes the testimony and weighs it. The old limita- 

tions -- we are particularly familiar with vouching as to a 

witness has certainly been severely reduced and we will 

limit cross examination and then you can put him on. 

JAMES F. VOYLES 
  

the witness, after having first been duly sworn to 

tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, 

took the stand and testified, as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR, STILL: 

n May {t please the Court, the witness is James 

Everett Voyles. He lives at 1102 Savannah Street in the City 

of Mobile. He has a B.S. Degree -- and a M.A. Degree from 

the University of Mississippi, and a PHD Dogree from 

North Texas State University in Denton, Texas, with the 

            153  



  

major in political science. 

He is presently employed in his own business, which 

is known as James Fverett Voyles and Associates. 

Dr. Voyles, what is your age? Sp 

A Thirty-two. 

Q You also hold a part-time teaching jobs at Springhil 

College and the University of South Alabama? | 

A That was true, Mr. Still, up until May, at which 

time, I resigned in total from Springhill. I will teach in 

the fall at the graduate program at the University of South 

Alabama, assuming it is funded. 

Q Would the clerk hand the witness Exhibit number 9, 

please? 

Here you are. Do you have one? 

A Is that my desertation, Mr. Still? 

Q Yes. 

A I have a copy here. 

Q Fine. They are all numbered the sama, Judge. Would 

you explain to us what Plaintiff's Exhibit number 9 is? 

A It is my doctoral desertation which is entitled 

a
r
 

"An Analysis of Voting Patterns in Mobile, Alabama, 1948 through 

1970". 

Q And this was in partial completion of your PHD? 

A Yes. That's right. 
        - 154       

  

  

the Pl. 

square 

ma jor 

variab 

of thes 

Q 

answer. 

A 

handle: 

     



443 
  

Q What was the general purpose of the study? 

A The general purpose of the study was really to be 

a methodological statistical study of the voting patterns in 

the City of Mobile during the years this indicates. 

Q What statistical devices or methods did you use to 

measure voting behavior? 

A Are you referring to the Pearson product moment? 

0 Yes. 

A Yes. I used that as a means of determining correlation 

between variables in voting. 

Q Is this a form of regression analysis? 

A Yes, it is. 

Q And is it substantially similar to the least sq:uar-~- 

method of analysis? 

A Yes. As Dr. Schlichting testified, the methods that 

the Plaintiffs used a multiple correlation is based on least 

squares. This is always a derivative of least squares. The 

ma jor difference, the Pearson product moment handles only one 

variable at a time whereas the multiple handles any number 

of them. | 

Q They come out with generally the same statistical 

answers given the same information? 

A Yes. Theoretically, at least, if the data was 

handled exactly the same the results would be exactly the 

              155: 

 



  

  

HR. STILL: 

In the bottom of the second paragraph, you make 

the statement, "The implications appeared to be that 

identification with the black vote was to be avoided if one 

was to be successful in local elections. 

influence was virtually deleted in Mobile, ". 

Now, was that a conclusion of your study? 

A Yes. That is basically a conclusion. ° 

Q All right. Wasn't the thesis 

you set out to prove in this desertation that black voting 

influences in the City of Mobile over the time period you 

were talking about hed decreased and thé Republican influence 

was increasing during the same time period? 

A Yes. 

Q All right. Did you prove that hypothesis? 

A I think I proved very well the question of the black. 

I am not for sure I did so well on the Republican, although 

statistically they both proved out. 
! 

You then again make the same type of 0 All right. 

statement about black influence in the elections, on page 

one hundred, I believe, in the bottom paragraph on that page, 

you make a statemant that while blacks seem to be supporting 

all three winners in 1953 that everybedy who won in 1969 did 

not carry the black wards; is that correct?       
    

ne oni 

Thus, black electorsdl 

or the hypothesis that 

460 

  | ~ 156; 

  
  

  

  

  

  

= 
D
-
D
D
 

B
D
 

and seve: 

that it 

identifi. 

A 

Q 

with the 

A 

race and 

in Mobil. 

strong {: 

particul: 

gROt tOO 

candidat: 

to find : 

was part: 

Q 

substant: 

  

     



ake 

if one 

. electoral 

esis that 

oting 

| you 

nfluence 

he black. 

though 

e of 

page 

at page, 

porting 

969 did   
  

  

h
s
 

S
E
A
L
 

  

  

  

  
ill in Mobile. 

Did not carry the black groups, yes. ER 

Q All right. Is that a conclusion of your study? 

A Yes. 

Q Is that in support of your hypothesis? 

A Yes, it is. 

2] And I believe that you stated on page one hundred 

and seven of the desertation, around the middle of the page 

that it is better to ignore the black vote than to risk 

identification with it? 

A Yes, 1 did. 

Q : All right. Now, what do you mean by identification 

with the black vote? : 

A: - - Well, by 1969, Mr. Still, the issue of Civil Righ:s, 

race and so on, had become very important, an important issue 

Perhaps it reached its peak, but certainly was a 

strong issue anyway and had been in the '65 race, as well,   particularly in '69. What I Beant by this was LE a candidate 

got too close to the black vote and was identified as a 

candidate of the black community he was very likely, in 1969, 

to find some white backlash to his particular candidacy. This 

was particularly critical, if you were in a runoff election. 

Q Your thesis is not that any person who receives 

substantial black votes is going to lose, but that that candi 

      NE  



  

    Ey — 462 

  

  

  

          

date will lose if white voters perceive that the candidate 3 Since 

is identified with black voters; is that Horvest? 5 at whi, 

A Yes. That is basically what it is. 9 opposi 

Q So, it is quite possible, under the thesis that you : black 

have developed here, for a candidate to receive a substantial 3 large 

number of black votes and still be successful; is that correct? h with ti 

A Yes. I would have assumed, in 1969, that a candi- J from ti 

date could have received a substantial amount Jf votes in the i expect 

black commmity and still have been successful. | came, 

Q Now, would it also be congruent with your thesis Q 

that a candidate -- if a candidate was identified with the in som 

black vote, that white voters might vote against that candi- data a 

date, notwithstanding how the candidate actually did in the A 

black wards on the same day? recall 

A I suppose that is possible, although we don't have Q 

any results of that that I know of. situat 

n All right. And most of the cases that you studied, A 

didn't the allegation of -- well, the identification with the type t 

black vote or with the block vote, as it is called in adver- in the 

tisements, sometimes doesn't that generally take place in a Q 

runoff election? Langan 

A Yes, The tendency was and this is in the perception A 

part of the tendency <0 that several candidates would run in data. 

the first race which two of them would end up in a runoff. 0 

ig 158 "          



——rbhd 

didate 

that you 

bstantial 

At correct? 

candi- 

ws in the 

hesis 

kh the 

E candi- 

in the 

't have 

studied, 

with the 

n adver- 

cre in a 

erception 

ld run in   
  

  

Since the election we are talking about requires a majority, 

at which time, in the case of Joe Langan, in particular, his 

opposition would publish in the newspapers results of various 

black wards showing that Mr. Langan got a disproportionately 

large percentage of the black votes and thus identifying him 

with the black vote and the strategy would be the reaction 

from the white commmity to offset the votes Mr. Langan was 

expected to get from the black area and the perception part 

came, of course, from the opposition that published this. 

0 In Mr. Langan's case, didn't you find in here that 

in some cases tiie’ opponent would use the previous election 

data against Mr. Langan the first time around? 

A No. I don't believe I did, Mr. Still. I don't 

recall that, if I did. 

Q It is just ‘generally restricted then to runoff 

situations? 

A To my knowledge, the only advertisements of that 

type that appeared within the period of this desertation was 

in the runoff with Mr. Bailey and Mr. Langan in 1969. 

Q All right. Was 1969 a runoff with Mr. Bailey and 

Langan, or was it just the first election? 

A Yes. It was not a runoff. 1 assume I used the 1965 

data. 

0 - All right. Now, about page seventy of the desertatign 
        = 1591    



  

  
you began talking about some black candidates who have run 

for election? 

A Yes, I do. 

Q Which black candidates did you study? 

A The 1966 race of Dr. Russell who, I helieve, was a 

candidate for the Mobile County School Board and then, I 

believe, the election of Mr. -- that Mr. Montgomery and 

Mr. Bell contested, which was a special legislative race in 

Pid I do the one on 
. 

1969. You might prompt my memory. 

the Jacobs race in the desertation? 

Q I don't see it mentioned. 

A I don't believe I did. Okay. 

Q All right. Now, what conclusions did you draw about 

the chance of a black person being elected at an at large 

election? 

A I don't know that I came to that conclusion. None 

of these three candidates were successful. 

n Did you run any sort of an analysis about the votes 

that they received in various wards? | 

A They received substantially more vote in the black 

area than they did in the white. 

8) Would you look at page seventy-two, please? 

You have a statement there, ''In fact, the percentage 

of vote for Russell in each ward corresponded closely to 

        . 160 

| 464 

  
  

  

the per 

Russell 

did in 
: : 

the per 

percent 

substan 

A 

not for 

statist 

Q 

Plainti 

page at 

Exhibit 

you were 

page inc 

correlat 

legislat 
       



Sul Co a SRT BY.   

the percentage of negro voters in that ward." 

Is that a conclusion of your thesis? 

A Yes, {it is. 

Q Would you think that that would indicate, at that 

wag a time, a racially polarized voting situation? 

A I think it indicates, in that particular race, that 

Russell did substantially better in the black area than he 

ce in Sid §5 ‘the white. 

Q All right. Does it indicate to you, considering 

the percentage of vote that he got in comparison to the 

percentage of black in each ward, that he was receiving 

substantially negro votes and no others? 

iy about A He was receiving substantially negro votes. I a= 

rge not for sure I can come up with a cause and effect on the 

statistics. I was not in Mobile at the time. 

None Q All right. Would the Clerk hand the witness 

Plaintiff's Exhibit number 53, please? 

Yotes Would you look at, please, the top of the first 

page at the results of the City Commission races and this 

Slack Exhibit has been previously explained to us and I believe 

you were here, at the time, that the top half of the first 

page includes the Pearsons R, that is the product moment 

e 
eentag correlation coefficients run by you for each one of these 
to 

—   legislative races -- excuse me, City Commission races for 

161} 
            
 



  

  
  

  

groups holding race constant, as we say? 

A Yes. I compared the low income white groups with the 

higher income white groups. 

THE COURT: 

There seems to be some of your notes in this Exhibit, 

Hand them to him, Mr. law clerk. 

MR. STILL: 

All right, excuse me. . 

0 Does this table show only the difference between low 

white and high white? : 

A Yes, I believe so. | 

n All right. Is it possible to compute, fiom the tants 

beginning at page one hundred and twenty, the difference 

between the low black and the low mid-black? 

A Yes. 

0 All it would be is a subtraction effort, wouldn't iti 

A Yes. 

MR. STILL: 

Your Honor, I would like to show the witness -- we 

are running out of space to tack it up on the board over thert 

This is Plaintiff's Exhibit number 56. Take a look at that 

for a moment. 

All right. Plaintiff's Exhibit 56 is a chart showing 

the differences between -- in the case of the dotted red line 

          162:   

473 

  

    

a
i
 

a 
hi
 

fe
 

R
e
 

  

  

showing 

low ine 

differe 

percent 

corresp- 

twenty - 

A 

Q 

from th 

are not 

the dif 

income 

respect 

the sol 

would t 

middle = 

that th 

The dif 
       



ith the 

xhibit 

en low 

1e table 

dn't 1t1 

-— We 

er there. 

that 

showing 

ad line 

I——     
  

  473 

  

showing the differences between the low income black and the 

low income white who voted for the winner. 

In other words, that would be the same as the first 

column labelled "Difference' on page one hundred and twenty, 

wouldn't {t be, Dr. Voyles? 

A Yes. 

Q All right. Now, the solid red line shows the 

difference between Yower middle income blacks and whites, the 

percentage voting for the winner, and I believe that would 

correspond with the last column on page one hundred and 

twenty marked difference, wouldn't it? 

A Yea, sir. 

Q All right. Now, the black lines are then compuod 

from the material that you have on this table and the differen 

are not specifically shown, but the dotted black line shows 

the difference between lower income blacks and lower middle 

income blacks that would be comparing the column -- those 

respective columms and taking the difference batween them and 

the solid black lines show the same thing for whites, which 

would then take the colurms labelled lower white and lower 

middle white and take a difference between them. 

Now, looking at this chart, don't we generally see 

that the difference between racial groups -- no, excuse me. 

The difference between income groups remains fairly low from 

ices 

          163-  



  

  

  

  

is LS BLT) E=. 

1961 on, whereas it was much higher in the fifties? Q 

; A Yes, it is. nor has 1 

: Q Doasn't tite chart also show that the difference A 

; betwean the racial groups was about the same as the difference at this p 

betwaen income groups in the fifties, but that it got much campaign ° 

higher into the thirty to forty percent range in the sixties; Q 

3 isn't that correct? "R" in th 

; A Yes. That is what it shows. z additiona 

4 Q All right. Now, would you econelude from looking at cost him 

L this Exhibit which, of course, is based on the table in your A 

| thesis that over the time from 1953 to '69, which is a period Q 

covered by your thesis, that the income of the voter has become A 

less important in explaining the difference in turn out than Mr. Langa 

the race of the voter has? perhaps t 

A Actually, we are not talking about turn out. We are factor, t 

talking about..... numbers - 

Q Excuse me, voting for the winners, I am sorry. ten, elev 

A Yes. Ve are limiting that up to and including 1969. sixteen In 

That is true. is fewer 

Q All right. Your Homor, this chart includes some 

data from 1973 that was aleo presented to us by the Defendants. received 

We will present this in evidence at a later time he did ir 

once we have gotten that material in. the black 

1965; thas   MR. ARENDALL: 
  

        Gs       ——



mrence 

=h 

Eies; 

2 at 

your 

=riod 

become 

than 

BR are 

1969. 

LL
 

1dants.   
  

     

   Su
 

ih
 

H
A
A
R
 

    

17 
4 

i 
, 

58 
" 

C5 
k 

5 
R
R
 

LA
 

S
E
E
R
 

Ey 
RI
NN
E 

Re 
E
I
 

BO
CA
 

Te
 

  

Q : In any event, that was not dos ta your desertation 

nor has it been done in Dr. Schlichting's regression theory? 

A No, and going further than that, it cannot be done 

at this point. It would have to be done at the time of the 

campaign while it was going on. 

Q While your desertation indicates a very high Pearson 

"R" in the Langan 1969 race, did you make a sufficient 

additional study to form a conclusion as to what actually 

cost him the election? 

A Yes. I made some comments on that in the desertatior 

Q Would Jor abrash those to us? 

A Well, I think the obvious thing that happened to 

Mr. Langan in 1969 was the boycott in the black area and 

perhaps the impact of the hurricane Camille, but for whatever 

factor, the fact that blacks did not turn out in large 

numbers -- to give you some figures about that, in wards 

ten, eleven, twenty-two and twenty-three, Mr. Langan received 

sixteen hundred and ninety-two fewer votes than in 1965. That 

is fewer in 1969 than he did in 1965. 

In wards three, twenty and thirty-two, Langan 

received three hundred and sixty-six votes fewer in 1969 than 

he did in 1965, yet his percentage of vote that he got from 

the black area was roughly the same as what he received in 

1965; that is, he received most of it. 

k. 

        165  



Q Now, cause and effect is not shown, as you said? 

A No, not by the statistical work. 

Q All right. Do you have your thesis there in front 

of you? 

A Yes, I do. 

  —1 Aly 

black for another type of ward, 

So, there is -- that would be forty percent black or 

a forty-five percent gap in there? 

A Yes. 

Q We are not talking about smaller increments of 

vote, escuing the diagram in some way showing a smaller 

relationship or near perfect relationship on the basis of 

that? 

A Yes. We had a pretty good gap in them. 

nN Forty-five percent is a pretty good gap when we are 

talking about a hundred percent universe, aren't we? 

A Yes. . 

Q Now, the thesis you were testing -- the hypothesis 

you were testing in this thesis was that black voting power 

in the City of Mobile had decreased during the period under 

study. 

Now, you found that to be true, didn't you? 

How are A Yes. If you are going to -- yes, okay. 

you going to define voting power in what you are saying?             
fo E 

  

Q 

A 

Q 
a sentenc 

THE COURT 

MR. STILL 

THE COURT 

MR. STILL 

mathemati 

between g: 

f
w
 

A 

Q 

A 

Q ] 

A 

Q 3 

between tw 

pr the obv 

we are rea 

pf associa 

     



black or 

of 

ler 

is of 

1 We are 

ythesis 

ry power 

1 under 

front   
  

484 

Q Look at page twenty-nine, please. 

A Okay. 

Q Now, toward the bottom third of the page there is 

a sentence........ 

4. THE COURT: 

| What page? 

MR. STILL: 

i lMr. STILL: 

3 mathematical models that determine the degree of association 

Foo
 
B
E
.
 

UI
D 

E
B
 

- 
SE
R 

  
i" [between two factors and we have ruled out the obvious anomalie! 

+' lor the obvious things like shoe size and reading ability, if 

489 
  

Twenty-nine, your Honor. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

That reads: ''Product moment correlations are 

between given variables." 

Yes. 

Now, you used the term there, "degree of association" 

Yes. 

Instead of cause and effect? 

Yes. 

Now, once you have shown a degree of association 

we are really trying to test something, doesn't that degree 

pf association shown by Pearson's R actually shows us that 

J - 

    4 167; 4;    



  

  

’; | SR 
the two factors are associated in some way; isn't that 

correct? 

A Yes. It shows association. What it does not show 

is the reason for this association. 

Q Right. And we can, once we have shown the associatid 

between childrens' shoe sizes and their reading ability, once 

we have shown there is that correlation, then we can look at 

it with our own intelligence and say, well, of course, there 

is cause, they are ‘both related to age; isn't that correct? 

A Surely. 

Q When we are dealing with elections, I believe you 

said you were replicating a study that had been made in 

Atlanta trying to determine the impact of race and income on 

voting within the City of Atlanta and, in this case, you did 

it for the City of Mobile and there are other studies for 

other areas, aren't there? 

A Yes, there are. 

Q After we have this statistical measure called 

Pearson's R we can then look at it with our~ own human 

intelligence to determine whether or not it means anything; 

isn't that correct? 

A Yes. 

Q And in writing your thesis you looked at the 

Pearson's R that you got and you determined that black voting   

n 

  
      —— a 7 ;     

a
y
 

ro
 

PETE
 

A 

  

MR. AREN 

THE COUR 

BY MR. A 

Q 

one hund 

referrin 

cause th 

(or grou 

or befor 

correctl 

was pred 

A 

catch th 

Q 
      
 



nt 

Ot show 

RSsociatign 

-ty, once 

look at 

=» there 

rrect? 

e you 

in 

zome on 

you did 

for 

hing;   voting 

  

  

ik) 
491 

  

power had decreased during the period under study, didn't 

you? 

A Yes, I did. 

MR. ‘STILL: 

All right. That's all the questions that I have. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Judge, I overlooked asking one brief question. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

RECROSS EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. ARENDALL: 

Q If you would, please, turn, Dr. Voyles, to page 

one hundred of your desertation right up at the top. You are 

referring there to the Langan election in 1969 and you have a 

cause that says; "He did not carry a majority in any ward 

(or group) that was predominantly white.". 

Now, should not the words "Any ward" and then the 

or before the group be deleted and should not the clause 

correctly say, "He did not carry a majority of any group that 

was predominantly white'? 

A Yes. That is correct. I am surprised they didn't 

catch that. 

Q In the election in which Mr. Langan was defeated, 
        _ 169!  



      

      
  

THE COURT: 

When we use voting power, we have to use in conte t 

with different things, don't we? 

A Yes. 

THE COURT: 

That is one of the problems we run into with statis- 

tics. Go ahead. 

MR. STILL: 

That's all the questions I have, your Honor. 

THE COURT: 

All right. Who is your next witness. 

MR. STILL: : 

We call Dr. Charles Cotrell. 

CHARLES COTRELL 
  

the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs and 

after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, the whol 

truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and testified 

as follows:   
DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. STILL: 

Q May it please the Court, this is Dr. Charles L.         Cotrell. He lives at 210 King William Street, San Antonio, et 
      170 

(} 
] 

  

  

  

  

the p 

get t 

    
  

     



DELBERT: 7, 

conte t 

» statis- 

iffs and 

the whole 
?   testified 

  

  

  

498 
  

the present case, but we will take them up at the time we 

get to them. 

Now, Dr. cotrell, what background work have you done 

here .in the City of Mobile to prepare yourself for the testi 

mony in this case? 

A I examined Dr. Voyles's thesis. I examined the 

work done by the two statisticians hired by the Plaintiffs. 

I undertook fairly extensive interviews with politically 

active persons in Mobile City politics and Mobile County and 

schoolboard politics. 

I read AeMIpabeE articles on Mobile politics and 

visited Mobile, for these purposes, personally three times 

for period roughly of ten or twelve days. 

Q Now, what does the term "voting dilution' mean to 

you as a political scientist? 

A Voting dilution means the cancelling or submergeance 

of a voting group, an identifiable group of voters. It is 

usually used in association with at large elections. That 

is the context within which I have used the term and have 

seen it used. It suggests that a number of factors have 

come to play, some historical and some current have converged 

to bring about an effect which basically, as it were, freezes 

permanently or makes it significantly difficult for a parti- 

cular group to express their preferences. 
        1717  



  

  
  

    

It is associated with a very important dynamic, 

that is of racial polarized voting, in a context where race 

has shown to be manifest in elections or in a -- in a context 

wherein vibe can become manifest in the elections. 

In the particular electoral structure of at large 

elections in the context of the dynamics of racially 

polarized voting, racial dilution occurs when, for example, 

one racial group of a minority numerically or possibly have 

a majority numerically, but still, in a voting minority 

faces, in the sense, we could say the hostility of a white 

majority or a black majority, but faces hostility of a 

voting majority which basically controls the entire electoral 

-- @lection and so on. 

So, the dilution occurs when the preference of the 

minority numerical or the minority occurs when the preferences 

are no longer registered in the system. In other words, 

the votes could be cast time and time again, but to no 

avail. 

Now, there are other factors which have been found 

in behavior in law, but that is the basic dilution notion. 

Q All right. Now, what data from Mobile did you 

examine to decide whether or not voting dilution of black 

voting strength exists in Mobile City? 

A I examined correlations that were presented to this 

        i 

Court. 

I heard 

I examin: 

I also e 

which ha 

Q 

your opi: 

voting p 

MR. AREN 

consider 

can be b 

what dil 

definiti 

or his p 

MR. STIL 

Mobile h 

thereby 

structur 

        
 



race 

ontext 

ite 

ctoral 

the 

und 

on . 

ck 

this 
    
  

| 499 _ 500 
  

Court. 1 interviewed some eighteen to twenty individuals. 

I heard testimony in this Court for the past two days. 

I examined what can be called racial campaign appeals and 

I also examined, as I suggested to you, Dr. Voyles's thesis 

which has been introduced as evidence into this Court. 

Q From this evidence, what is your opinion what is 

your opinion about whether or not voting dilution of black 

voting power exists in Mobile? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Just a minute. Objection to that. I do not 

consider that he has stated the facts on which an opinion 

can be based. 

Well, he is giving a political science view of 

what dilution is. That is not necessarily the Court's 

definition of what dilution is, but to develop his thesis 

or his point, I will let him testify. 

MR. STILL: 

Have you reached a conclusion? 

A Yes, I have. 

It is my opinion that black voting strength in 

Mobile has been diluted and the black voting strength is 

thereby basically cancelled or negated in the at large 

structure in the Mobile City elections. 
        173      



  

  

PL
B 
h
i
e
 N
n
 
P
I
N
E
S
 

SASSI 
h
t
t
 

ls
 

e
t
 
b
o
s
 

EI
RP
 

i
=
 
S
a
i
 

id
 P
G
s
 

v
o
i
t
 

R
I
E
S
 

    

Dr. Schlichting's testimony; is that correct? 

A Since approximately ohe-£ifteen on Monday. 

Q All right. James Buskey and some other witnesses 

that we have had have suggested that lower black voter 

turn out in elections is a residual effect on past 

discrimination. 

Do you feel that you have sufficient evidence to 

draw that same conclusion here for the City of Mobile? 

A I would like to look at more data before I would 

reach the conclusion that it is simply the residual effect 

that causes low black participation or low voter turn out. 

We do, hovaver, have some evidence and I would, among the 

explanations, lean toward a residual -- the residual impact 

of exclusionary laws in the past. 

We have evidence which shows up to 1965 that there 

was a fairly massive differential in voter registration and 

this doesn't necessarily mean turn out, but it is an 

indicatory. 

Secondly, I believe Plaintiffs have' introduced some 

contrast between predominantly white and predominantly black 

wards and turn out in the seventies. 

The interviewees all estimate that the turn out is 

lower. So, I think we have some basis to reach a tentative 

conclusion that there is a differential between black and 

      X73   

  

  

  
US
 

  

{ white tur 

: As 

. political 
' 

ill explanati 

: out would 

Sharshans 

Kenneth W 

book on yo 

 ebenoture 

: rates anc 

historic 
: 

li 

of exclus 

voters ii 

indigenos 

as a pol 

national 

and yet 

anals of 

would su 

     



     

  

  

  

    
  
  

lh 504 

i white turn out. 

As to the residual question, it Seems to me that 

esses 81. poritical science offers us, I should say, three possible 

mid &ll"t explanations. One of them would be that black voter turn 

a out would be the result of past electoral structures. Ira 

| Hi Sharshansky (sic) in his book on regionalism in America, 

= to gl Kenneth Vines -- I am sorry, Jacobs and Vines and their 

2? oF book on American State Politics, suggest that electoral 

ould i structures do, indeed, have a real impact upon participation 

af fect rates and if a group of citizens have been excluded 

a out. historically, : 4 ehirke we can reasonably expect that legacy 

z the “of exclusion to hang on, as it were, as a residual effect 

impact 1 in terms of their voter turn out. That is one explanation 

and that is the explanation to which I lean. 

there * lo What are the other explanations? 

on and ¥ A A second explanation would simply be that black 

3 voters in Mobile, as blacks are apathetic, something 

| indigenous in the group. I don't believe I would honor this 

d some 5 as a political science explanation. It gets into the 

y black ; national character studies that have been fairly discredited 

and yet a third explanation would suggest that it is in the 

ut is |. anals of voting behavior literature a third explanation 

tative | : would suggest that lower income people turn out less and that 

td 4 : 

| | 375       
 



  

  

  

  

there is an overlap between black voters and lower income 

people. 

of course, we had testimony yesterday which showed 

that in spite of the economic levels, as it were represented 

in Dr. Voyles's thesis, the differential between white and 

black voters and turn out in the sixties maintained. Thus 

I would return to my original point, the residual explana- 

tion seems to have credence. : 

Q All right. Let's go back over a couple of these 

points for a moment. As regards the second point, you said 

it might be something indigenous in the black character and 

then you said that deals with the national character studies 

which have been pretty well discredited? 

A Well, let me elaborate on that. I don't want to 

make this a vowel, but it could be a possible explanation, 

as I see it. During the thirties and forties a number of 

studies were contrived concerning the authoritorian or 

regimenting might of the German. people, tracing it back to 

some pression regimentation in the ainpresish century. To 

impute to a group, a racial group to an ethnic group or to 

fiipute th a national group characteristics such as in the 

area of the country that I am from, Mexican-Americans are 

simply lazy, is dangerous stereo-typing and I don't see any 

evidence which suggests that there is anything indigenous 
          176   

  
    

in blac 

that the 

Q 

conduct 

turn ou 

and sin 

the lep 

A 

plece c 

of blac 

House c 

whereir 

office 

to that 

electir 

legisla: 

I have 

the Be: 

decisi 

MR. AR 

THE CO 

     



Encome 

showed 

oresented 

-te and 

Thus 

~plana- 

“hese 

“ou said 

ter and 

studies 

or to 

1 the 

8B are 

  

  see any 

2nous   
  

in black voters in Mobile as a group that they would suggest 

that they don't turn out. 

Q All right. Now, have you examined any evidence or 

conducted any interviews about the difference between voter 

turn out and multi-member elections or at large elections 

and single member district elections which we have here for 

the legislature? 

A Well, I have, in the context of San Antonio, one 

piece of evidence we have here appears to be the high degree 

of black voter turn out in the single member district, 

House district ninety-nine; that is John LeFlore's old seat, 

wherein, I believe, six candidates offered themselves for 

office and there seemed to be a response among black voters 

to that number of candidates and to the possibility of 

electing a black to -- or a person from that district to the 

legislature. | 

I have also compared, I would say this very briefly, 

I have also compared the effects of the same phenomenon in 

the Bear County, Texas, the original authority in the White 

decision. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Just a minute. 

THE COURT: 

We are not going into what you found out there. You 

  

506 

        7rd  



  

  

    

may use the basis of any studies you made in drawing 

conelusions and facts you have found in this one. I would 

suggest you do not interject those other cases into it. 

MR. STILL: 

You have heard testimony in this Courtroom from 

several persons saying that black people generally have not 

run for at large elections, because they felt that they did 

not have sufficient voting power to win them and I believe 

Mr. Buskey testified that he would not runin an at large 

election, because he could not win such an election. 

Have you bekn able to gather any sort or make any 

sort of conclusion on the basis of the ‘testimony that you 

have heard here, the interviews that you had on the other 

evidence that you looked at as to the participation as 

candidates by blacks in an at large election system versus 

a single member district system? 

A The political science language for this would be 

the recruitment of candidates and based on the testimony I 

have heard, and based on the interview sources, I would have 

to conclude that black voters -- black candidates would 

basically -- potential candidates would be discouraged from 

running in at large situations and the view expressed to 

me and in this Courtroom is that there is a high probability 

that we won't win or it is impossible or, as one person 

  

        
  

missin 

said, s-   
which t° 

discour 

through: 

hence r 

discour 

Q 

Honor a 

voting 

thirty 

they ar 

tical 

sugges 

thirty 

Mobile 

appare 

he cor 

    178"      



I would 

rom 

ave not 

hey did 

relieve 

large 

versus 

d be 

mony I 

uld have 

uld 

ed from 

d to 

bability 

307 

    
  

508 
  

said, suicide, in the at large structure and the way in 

which this would be talked about would be a certain 

discouragement in the incentive to offer one's self or 

through association gather about political followers and 

hence run for office. So, my opinion would be that a 

discouragement factor is at work. 

Q All right. You have heard the question that his 

Honor asked the previous witness this morning about the 

voting power of blacks between the time that they are 

thirty percent oy so of the electorate, and the time that 

they are fifty percent of the electorate. 

Do you agree with the conclusion that Dr. Voyles       
reached that as long as racial polarization occurs that 

blacks will not be able to win at large elections? 

A Yes, I do. I would like to comment on that, 1f I 

might. 

Q Go ahead. 

A Judge Pittman formulated the hypothesis, the hypothet 

tical in a way in which we can ill afford to ignore. He 

suggested that in the hypothesis that as black voters in this 

thirty-five percent population figure gained strength in 

Mobile there is a tendency or potential to react among == 

apparently to react to that, as it were, as a threat. So, 

he concluded the logical conclusion would be that until 
  

            179 
-_—  



  

          
  

      

soe] 

blacks were in the majority in the at large structure you A 

really couldn't expect their preferences to be registered that tl} 

equitably. fk voters, 

I think that goes to a very realistic view of this : works 

particular rank or percentage rank of black population in 9 a white 

Mobile and I would add one thing to it. It is quite @r black 

pogsibls that that could be expressed, that resistance, yester: 

as it were, to black, increased black voter registration, case a 

could be expressed in a manifest way or it could in public 

opinion terms remain latent, as it were. We wouldn't know voting 

about the existence or possibly existence of racial THE CO 

campaigning and appeals to it until a black candidate BE 

basically a qualified candidate offers himself for office trying 

and, in this context, I think we would be back to our A 

probability of failure of success in the at large context. power 

It is a very crucial way, it seems to me, to understand a whit 

dilution in the Mobile context. as it 

Q All right. Now, that deals with black candidates running o to evc 

for election. | ; identi 

What about the situation where it is not a black £ atl e 

candidate running for office, but it is a white candidate 4 it see 

supported by the blacks. Can the blacks occupy a pivotal 3 vote I 

position thereby enhancing their voting power in the present : regis 

system? 

T1800 1        



—e you 

mtered 

wf this 

on in 

dates running 

lack   1idate | 

votal | 

e present 

  

  

ses : ee SRR 4 
  

        

A Well, Dr. Voyles's thesis and this testimony suggests 

that the black identification -- identification with black 

voters, as he calls it, is a kiss of death. I think dilution 

works whether or not there would be a black candidate or 

a white candidate openly and closely associated with the 

black interests. We had a very esteemed citizen of Mobile 

yesterday in the Courtroom, Mr. Joe Langan, and I think his 

case and his election in 1969 speaks to that point. 

Indeed, in terms of the pivotal vote notion or   voting power, as Judge Pittman framed it..... 

THE COURT: 

I was using a term that the witness used. I was 

trying to clarify what he meant by voting power. 

A Well, let's stay with counsel's use of voting 

power or the witness's use, as a term. What this means is 

a white candidate would have to approach the black community 

as it were, looking over his or her shoulder and hoping not     
to evoke any kind of intents or close identity or racial 

identity that would, in turn, cause what we would loosely 

call a back lash among white voters. That formulation, 

it seems to me in both the terms of discrediting the pivotal 

vote notion and also in terms of this increasing voter 

registration related to racial polarization is a very 

      
  

181%  



  

  
power. 

THE COURT: 

I understand. 

A Because of the racial context within which they must   

inciteful way to look at this, the Mobile situation. 

THE COURT: 

Now, I am not exactly sure just what you said. Do 

I understand you to say that it is dangerous to look at the 

increase of black voting power as minimizing their effect, 

just because it increases backlash or are you saying somethin 

else? 

A No. We had two parts of it, your Honor, two parts 

of the analysis, and War I am suggesting is that sort of 

a vicious Catch-22, as you might hypothesize on, could occur 

if racial polarization would indeed increase as blacks 

become a voting threat. 

THE COURT: 

If I understood you correctly, you are saying that 

racial polarization may increase, but it does mot necessarily 

decrease their power, because they have some power on the 

necessity of other people to seek their votes? 

A No. That is the second point I was addressing. I 

suggest their power is debilitated in the sense we use 

  

      182   
    

be app- 

THE CO 

far as 

seen i: 

ads th. 

be sad- 

vote a: 

for a + 

should 

voters 

voting 

causes 

       



id. Do 

kK at the 

effect, 

2 something 

D> parts 

rt of 

11d occur 

ks 

g that 

cessarily 

n the 

ne, .Y 

Be 

ey must | 

    

31 512 
  

  

be approached as a voting group. 

THE COURT: 

What was the danger? I understood you to say that 

there was some danger in viewing that. 

A Here is the danger, your Honor. It seems to me, as 

far as equitable or equal black voting strength, we have 

seen introduced into evidence here the newspapers and other 

ads that show black wards with '"x's' through them and to 

be saddled with that black vote, to openly court the black 

vote and black interest, could indeed be very problematic 

for a candidate. He must approach them looking over his 

shoulder to see how that reaction is received by the white 

voters and that is the very mechanism of racially polari=od 

voting or the potential of racially polarized voting that 

causes the problem in dilution. 

Q In other words, you agree with Dr. Voyles's statemen 

that it is a kiss of death to be associated with the black 

vote? 

A Yes, I do. 

Q For a white politician? 

A Yes, I do. 

Q Now, all of this hypothesis has been based on the 

idea that there is and will continue to be racial polarizati 

Now, have you found, from the evidence presented in 

  
on . 

      
  

  
 



    

  

      

~ ———tl) yy 

this case, particularly the computer analyses, the regression i MB. "ARES 

analyses, that there is a racial polarization of voters 3 Q 

within the City of Mobile? 4 that yom 

A Yes. I have found that to be the case. : election 

Q Do you find that it is diminishing, at the present 4 A 

time, or increasing or staying about the same? 4 Greenoup 

A I wouldn't respond to the question in terms of I am not 

more or less or whatever. I would suggest to you that racially 4 not. 

polarized voting exists, that it may be difficult to determine 5 Q 

fully that that exists in the '73 elections, although you do : seen the 

have some correlations. The interviews suggested that ; fact the 

neither of the candidates in the Greenough -Bailey race || and that 

were particularly favored by a great numbers of black voters) ; A 

that is, identified with black voters. This was the intervipw E intervie 

source and I guese more importantly the notion of race : 8 pPersor 

still seems to be here and it seems that quite possibly it communi 

could be evoked as an open issue, unfortunately, in 1976 as ¢ Q 

it was in 1969 in terms of the racial campaign ads. Indeed, 3 some whi 

testimony suggest that it was evoked in 1974. So, racial A 

polarization still persists in the seventies, in my opinion. polarize 

MR. STILL: . || group 14 

Thank you. That's all the questions I have. and thei 

MR. ARENDALL: | i what Dr. 

Your Honor, give me about five minutes to look over , Q 

184. ;         
     



resent 

of 

at racially 

determine 

h you do 

at 

ace 

k voters) 

interyioe 

    
    

539 
  

  

e
a
 

S
F
E
 

TS 
che

 
Le 

So
da

dh
in

st
 
d
T
 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Dr. Cotrell, did I understand you to say awhile ago 

that you purported to find some racial polarization in 1973 

election for the City Commission? 

A I would have to see the correlations on the 

Greenough - Bailey race, but I believe the correlations -- 

I am not sure whether it was statistically significant or 

not. 

Q Well, I thought you based your opinion on having 

seen the correlations. I want to call your attention to the 

fact that it was shicty-Five -- the R square was thirty-five 

and that is well ander the trash range,isn't it? 

A Well, I also suggested to you to verify that the 

interview sources suggested that Greenough and Bailey, unlike 

a person like Langan, were not overly identified in the black 

community as representing black interests. 

Q Do I understand you to say that black candidates or 

some white candidates have shunned the black vote? 

A No. I said white candidates in the context of racial 

polarized voting would probably have to approach a voter 

group like a black voting group in Mobile very cautiously 

and their approach and their strategies would have to avoid 

what Dr. Voyles had described as the kiss of death. 

Q And can you give me any caikdidate for City Commission 

ly 

        185



  

    

  

  

  
  

  

154 BB 

MR. MENEI 
in recent years that have shunned the black vote? 

i } 
A I wouldn't be qualified to suggest that this candidate 

or that candidate in the closeness of a campaign headquarters 

developed the strategy or that. I am simply suggesting that 
f 

that is an explanation of the way campaigns are waged, 

after ha 
recognizing that the black voters might make as much as 

; | whole tri 
twenty-five or thirty percent of the electorate. 

testified 
MR. ARENDALL: 

No further questions. : 

THE COURT: 

BY MR. Ml 
You may examine him. 

: Q ; 

old and 
REDIRECT EXAMINATION 

| in Dalla 
BY MR. STILL: 

Finished 
Q Dr. Cotrell, I have a couple of questions, please. 

a civil 
Would the Clerk hand Plaintiff's Exhibit number 4 to 

ledgue. 
the witness, please. 

THE COURT: | 
! at Alaba 

Before you do that, let's take about a fifteen 

minute break. 
A 1 

(RECESS) 

THE COURT: 3 2 
A with the 

All right. Mr. Still, 3 

1 A 
MR. STILL: 3 

186            



andidate 

uarters 

g that 

  

a8e. 

r 4 to 

  
  

247 
  

al 

  

MR. MENEFEE: 

Mr. Sylvester Williams. 

SYLVESTER WILLIAMS 
  

the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and 

after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, the 

whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and 

testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

Q This is Mr. Sylvester Williams, forty-eight years 

old and lives at 350 Adams Street, Mobile. He was born 

in Dallas County and lived in Mobile County since 1940. 

Finished the third grade. He is on a labor committee and 

a civil rights committee for the non-partisan voters 

ledgue. 

He is treasurer of the shipbuilders union and works 

at Alabama Dry Dock and Shipbuilding Company. 

Is that correct, Mr. Williams? 

A That's right. 

Q Mr. Williams, how long have you been associated 

with the non-partisan voters league? 

A Since 1960, around 1960. 

      TART   
 



  

  

Q And when were you registered to vote in Mobile? 

A In the late sixties. 

Q Prior to that time, had you attempted to register 

to vote? 

A Yes, I did. 

Q About how many times? 

A About six or seven times. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

I object, if your Honor please. 

into past discrimination. 

THE COURT: 

Well, I have told them that since 1950 that there 

was a stipulation up until 1950, but I have told them that 

since that time -- that is as far as the stipulation went. 

Go ahead. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

I am sorry. About how many times did you try to 

register? 

A About six or seven times. 

Q Would you describe some of those efforts? Did you 

go down with other people? 

A Well, we went down with other peoples, Moss Johnson 

and several others, but we couldn't make it. 

Q Were you allowed to take the test? 

I think we have gon 

  

        168   V
S
I
 
N
A
 

E
E
 

ge
 

  

E
R
 

  

  

regist: 

and I 

asked 1 

         



-=e IT 

mat 

RL.   
  

son   

  

  

549 
  

  

A Well, we tried to take the test, but we never could 

pass, 

Q What sort of questions were they asking you; do 

you remember? 

A Well, it has been a pretty good while ago and it 

is hard to remember. 

THE COURT: 

Was this prior to the voting rights act of 1964 or 

'65? 

A Yes, sir. 

THE COURT: 

I will take judicial knowledge that the board of 

registrars presented me with a list of questions preparea 

and I couldn't answer some of them. They called me and 

asked me what were they to do with them -- not what they 

could do with them, but did I know the answers and to some 

of them I didn't. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

This Mr. Moss Johnson you mentioned, was he active 

in the area in trying to encourage blacks to register to 

vote? 

A Yes, he was. 

Q How did he go about his operation? 

A - Well, he Wuld he was working at the yard there 

          h J 

_ 189 
—  



  
    

  

and he would ask them, you know, to take them down to get 
Hl 

them registered or to vote, 

Q Would he take a bunch of his co-workers? 

A You, sir. 

Q Was he very successful in this effort? 

A Well, he was taken down there, but he wasn't 

successful. 

Q He kept trying? 

A Yes, sir. 

Q What was ....... 

MR. ARENDALL: 

What time frame? 

THE COURT: 

Yes, give us the time. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Could you give me some estimate on this time? 

THE COURT: 

Within a period of time -- did the six times 

occur between what years? 

A I believe this was in the fifties, I believe. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Did they extend into the sixties? Did you attempt 

to register in the early sixties? 

A We tried it in 1960, but we wasn't successful until 
  

      . Po 
nm—   
  

  

Wa
 

i
 
a
 

er
 

  

T
I
M
I
 

A
 

AI
K 

R
T
H
 

R
N
 

| a
d
 

E
a
 th

o 

  

  

e
e
 

   

last 

in th 

MR. WM 

         



> get 

1ittempt   
  

  

  
FEE

 
POR

E 
a 

W
A
 

i
 

NB
 

ea
 

  

A
P
R
 

A 
SO

P 
RR

 
A
D
R
 

T
p
 

b
h
 

S551. 
    

S
A
E
 
S
E
 

HA
 

ac
a 

To
a 

at 
bb
 

ibis 
E
b
e
n
 

dt 
Be
ll
a 

fa
 

as 

after the voting rights act passed. 

Q Okay. 

THE COURT: 

When was the first time ‘and when was the last time? 

A I believe it was the early sixties, I believe, the 

last time. 

THE COURT: 

And the first time? 

A As close as I can get to it, I believe somewhere 

in the late fifties. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Since you have been registered to vote, have you 

regularly voted? : 

A Yes, sir. Since I have become a qualified voter 

I have missed one time voting. 

Q When was that? 

A This past ....... 

THE COURT 

I don't think that is necessary. 

A This past May. 

THE COURT: 

Let's get on to more meaningful things. 

  
  

  
    ~ 1917  



      

  

  

Do you remember demonstrations in front of City Hall 

one time in which Mr. Langan, I believe, came out? 

A Yes. Mr. Langan. 

Q What action did Mr. Langan take, at that time? 

A Mr. Langan come out there and asked them what did 

they want and broke it up and told them whatever they wanted 

or Whatever problems they had to come down to City Hall and 

see them and he would get together with them and work their 

problem out. 

THE COURT: 

Again, I express reluctance about cutting off a line 

of questioning, but I think this area is fairly well 

established and nobody really disputes what happened. If it 

comes up, I will let you offer it later. 

Just in the interest of moving this case along in   the areas where there seems to be no great dispute, let's don 

whip it to death. 

| MR. MENEFEE: 

i Over the years, the non-partisan voters league has 

endorsed a fair number of candidates; is that correct? 

A That is correct. 

Q How do you go about this process candidates come in 

and are interviewed? Do you endorse a candidate in every race 

A Well, most of it.           193 

  

  

  

Q 

candida 

A 

and the 

committ 

and wha 

the les 

non-par 

blacks 

A 

g
a
l
e
 
R
E
 
l
e
 

LeFlore 

A 

Q 
     



- Hall 

id 

-anted 

and 

heir 

line 

If ir 

has   
      

AB
 

T
R
G
 

SI
ON
 

WR
 

Se
 E

T 
e
m
i
 

556 
  

A
T
 

S
R
 

R
a
 

E
A
S
 

: 
a
 

Q | How do you make a decision? Suppose you have two 

candidates of which are very attractive, very good? 

A Well, we have what they call a screening committee, 

and the screening committee talks to them and the screening 

committee will make a recommendation back to the membership 

and what candidate they choose they are what they call picking 

the lesser evil. 

Q Are you often faced with this situation of picking the 

lesser of the evils? 

A That's right, pick the lesser evil. 

Q Do you think all of the candidates endorsed by the 

non-partisan voters league that have been elected have treated 

blacks fairly? 

A No. 

Q Why do you think they may not have treated you fairly? 

A Well, in one way, seeing that the County hasn't. 

Q Why do you think they don't treat you fairly? 

A While the County come in the black community and 

promise they are going to do this for them and they give the 

blacks red dirt and oyster shells on the roads. 

Q Let's see, you were a close associate of Mr. John 

| 
LeFlore, I believe? 

A Yes, sir. 

Q Do you know if Mr. LeFlore had, over the years in behalf 

      - 

193:  



357 
  

of the non-partisan voters league, written police commissoner 

Doyle about problems many times? 

A Well, he had written to Mr. Doyle numerous of times. 

Q What was the feeling of you and John LeFlore and 

members of the non-partisan voters league about the response? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

If your Honor please, he is being asked to testify 

to mental attitudes of a dead man and others and I object to 

the question. 

THE COURT: 

No. What the black community, what their feeling 

about it is, and he is familiar with it and his own and I 

will let him testify to it. 

A Well, Mr. LeFlore, he wrote to Mr. Doyle several times 

and...» 

THE COURT: 

They didn't ask for details. The question was, what 

was the feeling? 

A We felt like Mr. Doyle didn't give, not only to 

Mr. LeFlore, but to the black community, what this -- he 

didn't give the black community good representation. 

Q Do you remember reading or hearing of statements of 

Mr. Doyle being tired of John LeFlore? 

A Yes, sir. I believe he said that on T.V. and also 

      er Er FE TPR 5 

194     
| 

  

  

LeFlore 

on thi 

get in 

Cecil 1 

Q 

in touc 

A 

Q 

garbage 

A 

Q 

in this 

A 

Q 

touch « 

A 

say he 

Q 

A 

electic 

Q 

A 

Q 

blacks 

         



Bsoner 

ify 

cL £0 

ng 

what 

s of 

558 
  

| 

LeFlore was -- I don't know whether he talked to Mr. Doyle 

on this particular incident, but I believe he was trying to 

get in touch with Mr. Doyle on this killing incident, this 

Cecil McMillan case. 

Q Mr. LeFlore had a good bit of difficulty in getting 

in touch with Mr. Doyle? ? 

A I would say he did. 

Q Mr. Mims is in charge of public works and oversees the 

garbage workers, I believe? 

A Right. 

Q Was the non-partisan voters league or you involved     in this garbage strike? Did you follow that fairly closely? 

A Well, some, we aid. 

Q And did you think that Mr. Mims was easy to get in 

touch with and deal with on this matter? 

A Well, some of the people that worked for the City 

say he wasn't. 

Q Mr. Mims come into the black community very much? 

A Well, he come in there, like most politicians, when 

election time comes. 

Q Do you see much of him otherwise? 

A No. 

Q Do you think the City Commission generally treats 

blacks fairly? 
    
  

        i495    



  

  

    

              
  

    

          

—— ses [B- 

A No. £ a membe 

MR. ARENDALL: | 4 of the 

No further questions. i 

MR. MENEFEE: A 

That's all, your Honor. Q 

THE COURT: experie 

| You may come down. House n 

Whom will you have next? A 

MR. MENEFEE: Q 

Leonard Wyatt. A 

Q 

LEONARD WYATT : A 

the witness, called on behalf of the Plaintiffs, and people - 

| after having first been duly sworn to tell the truth, the of thei: 

whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the stand and Q 

| testified as follows: | in any « 

| A 
i DIRECT EXAMINATION 4 | 

; 4 House nf 

BY MR. MENEFEE: ] ’ 

Q This is Mr. Leonard Wyatt, forty-three years old, h 
& of servi 

lives at 473 West Creek Circle in Mobile. He is married and 8 
4 hold the 

has three children. Attended Springhill College for three 4 Q 

years. He was born in Mobile County and has lived here 4 
4 campaigr 

for the past twenty a TT in the real estate business; 3    



  

  
      

    
      

i LS0L 565 

a sienber of the Chamber of Commerce and board of directors 

of the Salvation Army. 

Is that a correct statement, Mr. Wyatt? 

A That is correct. 

Q Mr. Wyatt, would you tell the Court what your political 

experience amounts to? Were you a candidate this passed 

House ninety-nine election? 

A Yes, sir. 

Q Have you been active in other political campaigns? 

A Not as a candidate, but in support of candidates. 

Q In recent years, who were they? 

A I have not solicited. I have actively supported | 

3, and people that ran for public office in terms of being in fa.or 

-he of their candidacy. | 

and Q " I see. You have not worked, actively worked, then, | 

in any other campaigns? ; | 

A No, sir. 

Q Mr. Wyatt, why did you decide to run for vacant 

House ninety-nine seat? | 

A I felt, first of all, the need to render some type 

£2, of service to the community. I felt iminently qualified to 

24 and hold that position and that is basically it. 

mree 
Q Give me a ballpark figure of how much money your 

= campaign cost you. 

=siness; 
eo Agr |     
 



366 
  

  

Approximately four thousand five hundred dollars. >
 

Q Were you able to go around the community and shake 

a lot of hands and pass out literature? 

A Yes, sir. 

Q Did you make the runoff? 

A No, sir. 

Q Why had you not sought political office prior to 

this, Mr. Wyatt? 

A I never envisioned the possibility of winning before. 

Q Did House ninety-nine present an attractive possibili 

for winning? 

A It prompted the possibility for winning, based on 

the fact it was confined to a district in which I lived and 

in which I could move freely and meet most of the people who 

would be voting. 

Q Mr. Wyatt, would you consider running for the Mobile 

City Commission in the present at large elections? 

A I doubt it. 

Q Why is that? 

A First of all, I would have to be realistic in terms 

of the cost factor, the probability of raising enough money 

to support that kind of campaign. 3 

The money would not probably be forthcoming and the 

other thing would be that generally these elections seem to 

          195°   
  

  

  

  

‘ 

i 
id 

percen 

effect 

electi 

effect 

Q 

ations 

very e: 

what sc 

up witl 

probler 

     



CS. 

ake 

yefore. 

sibili 

obile 

366 

Ly 

  
  

S67. 
  

get wound up, some how, along racial lines and I would have 

to look at the numbers and kind of be overwhelmed by that. 

Q Okay, sir. Mr. Wyatt, do you have within the black 

community -- there are a number of organizations that endorse 

candidates such as the non-partisan voters league and the 

voters registration organization that are two of them. Can 

you give us your opinion on the influenceof the non-partisan 

voters league endorsement within the black community? 

A Of the non-partisan voters league? 

Q Yes. 

A I think they probably affect approximately twenty 

percent of the black community. I don't think they are as 

effective as they have been. I think their impact on 

elections is diminishing somewhat, but they do have some 

effect. 

Q And how about -- how are the other endorsing organiz- 

ations such as voters registration organization, are they 

very effective? 

A I have no idea. I only heard of the VRO when I 

was a candidate and happened to be interviewed by them. 

Q Mr. Wyatt, what sort of -- during your campaign, 

what sort of complaints and problems did the voters bring 

up with you? Did you hear many {ssues raised, community 

problems? 

          199.  



  

  

    
  

      

he 873 Ee 

toward ten in terms of going out in the community or they Q 

were at the other extreme on being down, being very vocal bearin 

against the people in that community, so that generally other 

speaking people would have voted whether they had endorse- 

ments or not and those votes would have been lopsided. \ you? 

Q All right. You are telling us then that you think A 

the lopsided vote in ward ten was the product of the indivi- MR. AR 

dual choice of voters? 

A I am saying that the attitude of candidates when you 

talk about ward ten and that point in time I am saying the 

attitude of candidates toward candidates in the black BY MR. 

community dictated, for the most part, how those people Q 

| voted. of the 

Q Now, Mr. Wyatt, you have spent many hours in City Spent 

Hall, haven't you? Did he 

| A Spent a few. | A 

| Q You are in the real estate business, aren't you? on wha 

| A Yes, sir. That is correct. spre. 

| Q You have been down there on many dohtad matters, Q 

| haven't you? indica 

| A A fou. voters 

| Q You have spent many hours with Mr. Mims and you have A 

| met with the other -- all three Commissioners, haven't you? within 

A All three Commissioners. would 

| ~ 200 Lae          



  

  

    
      

a $ 573 

hey Q : Never had any difficulty getting access to them, 

pal bearing in mind,of course, the fact that they have a few 

y other things to do. 

re You have ready access to the City officials, don't 

you? 

rink A Yes. 

ydivi~ MR. ARENDALL: 

No further questions. 

n you 

the REDIRECT EXAMINATION 

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

; Q Mr. Wyatt, Mr. Flannagan received the endorsement 

of the non-partisan voters league. Did it appear that he 
| 

ty spent a good bit of money and waged an active campaign? 

Did he run a hard race? 

| A He ran a race and spent a good deal of money, based 

2 | on what he produced. I have no way of knowing that for 

| sure. 

Q Does the fact that he ran so poorly against Mr. Buskey 

indicate anything about the strength of the non-partisan 

voters league endorsement? 

have A I would think that there are more independent thinkerp 

you? within the black community today than say in the past, which 

would have diminished their effectiveness. 

TT R01      



  

Q Mr. Wyatt, being in the real estate business, I 

suppose you have been around the City a good bit. 

Do you have an opinion as to whether or not black 

Belghborinods that you have worked in receive less equal 

treatment in regard to municipal services than white 

neighborhoods? 

A I would think that black neighborhoods have received 

less equal treatment than whites in terms of parks, playgroun 

recreational buildings and so forth. 

Q Mr. Wyatt, the access that you have had at City 

Hall, was that in regard to real estate matters or in regard 

to political matters? : 

A Basically, in regard to real estate matters. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

No further questions. 

RECROSS EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Have you ever sought access to the City Commissioners 

on political matters? 

A I may have. I don't recall a specific thing. 

Q In any event, you can talk to them and nobody says 

that we can only talk about real estate matters; is that 

right? 
        <02". 

  
  

B
e
 

is 
T
R
Y
 

  

a
 

S
p
 
p
e
g
s
 

E
e
 

  

F
R
 

     
M
E
 

AE
 

A 
Lr
 

    

       



574 
  

ack 

al 

ceived 

aygroun 

regard 

sioners 

says 

  

is, 

  

£ 

£ 
EA 

5 
& 

% 

4 
EY 

¥ 

2 
% 

  

{ 

& 
4 

  

A That is correct. 

Q If you want to go down there and discuss the 

presidential election or the local elections or a political 

problem you are satisfied you can speak to Mr. Mims and 

Mr. Doyle or Mr. Greenough, aren't you? 

A Sure. 

Q Now, you haven't really made any study to determine 

whether or not there is a reasonable basis for the location 

of the various parks, playgrounds and recreational buildings 

in Mobile? 

A No. IX don’e have to. Making a study would not be 

a thing I would normally do. Observation tells me a lot of 

things. Observation tells me, for example, that the para 

at Sage and Dauphin, for example, is an excellent place. 

Observation tells me that the park where Hank Aaron 

grew up and played as a boy at Hamilton and is willfully 

neglected. It tells me the park in Plateau, which was, 

in fact, given to the City by a member of the community is 

just now in the process of having something done. I don't 

have to make a study to determine what is being done for 

one community as to another. 

Q You mentioned Sage, Dauphin and the park at -- the 

Kidd Park in Plateau? 

          

  
! 

  

  
. Sb Ta 

575



  

  

  

    

  
  

  
  

  

—+1 3583 

Q Mr. Smith, have you ever been to any meeting at the took 

City Hall? ; 

A No, sir. J 

Q Have you ever talked to any of the current City { BY MR 

Commissioners? ; Q 

A Yes, I have. 1 A 

Q Which one? i Q 

A I talked with Mr. Mims and I talked with Mr. Doyle. A 

Q Is that down in their offices or where? ; Q 

A In their office. i OF 86 

Q As a matter of fact, you saw Mr. Mims about some A 

repairs to Bellsaw Avenue and it was patched afer that, Q 

although it wasn't re-paved, at that time; isn't that right? we. A 

A He directed me to the working committee or whatever A 

they call it. Q 

Q " So, you were able to see him when you wanted to fnvol 

see him? : A 

A Yes, I was. : Y ran 

Q And the street got patched, didn't 1t? | : event 

A That's right. | i 

Q And you have talked with Mr. Doyle about police | : in 19 

matters on occasion, haven't you? 

A Well, involved with myself. | in 19 

THE COURT: coil 

20% —                



aon 01 

= the 

yle. 

  

  
  

  

ER
ER

RR
 

Ri
 L
a
t
s
 
UG
 

  

E
R
Y
 

ST
 

588 
  

took the stand and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q State your name and address, please. 

A Dan Alexander, 3667 Claridge Road, North. 

Q And your present employment? 

A I am an attorney. 

Q And you are also presently a member of the board 

of school commissioners of Mobile County? 

A That's right. 

Q How long have you lived in Mobile County, 

Mr. Alexander? 

A All of my life. 

Q Would you describe briefly to the Court your 

involvement in politics in Mobile County? 

A I have been involved in politics for some time. 

I ran for office the first time in 1966 for the Democratic 

executive committee of Mobile County. 

I ran for delegate to the Democratic convention 

in 1968. 

I ran for the state legislature in 1970. 1I also 

in 1970 ran for re-election to the county executive 

committee in the State Democratic executive committee. 

  

  

  TARR T
y
       205



  

  

A In my particular campaigning? 

Q Yes. 

A Only in '74. 

Q ‘And that was when you ran against Mrs. Gill? 

A That's right. Along with four others. 

Q And in your opinion does the presence of a black 

candidate in the race in and of itself inject the racial 

issue into the campaign? 

A Well, you know, to the point that a black in the 

race would normally be expected to get the majority of the 

black vote. 

Q To the extent of what, sir? : 

A That you would normally expect the black candidate 

to get the majority of the black votes. 

Q And the white candidate would not normally expect 

to get much of the black vote, is that it? 

A That's correct. 

Q What about what opposition to the black candidate? 

Would the converse be true in terms of the majority of the 

white vote going to the white candidate? 

A I think that you can say that a white would be 

expected to get a majority of the white vote, yes. 

Q Would the Clerk show Mr. Alexander Exhibit 92. 

The Clerk is going to show you, Mr. Alexander, a 

  

592 

      

  

p
o
 

  

T
E
E
 

—
—
—
    

    commer 

of hav 

with t 

same [ 

  

        <06        



  

    

  

  

          

592 | | 503 

i copy of the school board minutes which contain a statement 

4 by you concerning this most recent election where you were 

¥ opposed by Mrs. Gill. 

BY THE COURT: 

1 Do you want this on the record? 
8 

ok | MR. BLACKSHER: 

al No, sir. 

) THE COURT: 

he : Let's go off the record. 

the ¢ (OFF RECORD DISCUSSION) | 

{ THE COURT: | 

é | Back on the record. 

an 1 MR. BLACKSHER: 

{ Q On page twenty-three of the minutes you say these 

sot 1 aren't the verbatim minutes of the meeting? 

v A That's right. 

t Q Regular meeting of the board of school dorm isioners 

ate? i Mobile County. Held in the board room of the Barton Acamdenmy 

the | ; Building on Wednesday, October 8th, 1975 at ten, A.M. 

| ; On page twenty-three, Mr. Alexander made the following 

; comments. He thought it was hard to argue with the logic | 

of having single member districts. That it was hard to HI 

: with the logic of all the board members representing the 

a : same people County wide as opposed to each of the board 

gpa pi ~ 207 

{     
 



  

  
  

  

    
  
  

              

: 1 

members representing a smaller area. That obviously : conse 

4 
Kane Kennedy offered the bill because of the desire to have 5 Q 

black representation on the board. The political realism E A 

was that a black presently would not win a county wide ¥ THE ct 
¥ 

race in this county, : 

EB repre: 
You were on public record as taking that position? 4 

A If I might explain, Mr. Blacksher, the minutes of : fepre: 

; 4 THE WI 
the school board, the verbatim minutes, or the verbatim i 

tape of the school board is our official record. : 

ffi THE COURT: Cit 

Is that essentially what you said, Mr. Alexander? Q 

: Ed d | 
A Yes, that is not a verbatim statement. nes 

Mobil 
| qQ But that is substantially it? 

A 
A That is substantially it. 

id ; THE COURT: ge 

That is the views you expressed? Q 

is! 
HA Yes. legis 

| : : 
ii Q You still agree with those views? gone. 

A Yes. Clry 

A 
Q Would you express a similar view with respect to 

dates 
black persons running in the City wide elections? 

A That they can't be elected City wide? 2 

A 
Q Yes. 

E race. 
A Of course, the proportion of blacks and whites was § 

. R08 i 1    



  

  

        

    
  

Ei 595 
—1—384 i 

4 considerably different in the City than it is in the County. 

have ¥ Q How different is it? 

t sm ; A I am not real sure. 

8 THE COURT: 

} Assuming there is a thirty percent black voter 

: 
fon? ¥ representation as opposed to a seventy percent white 

# 
of £ representation in the City, what would be your opinion? 

2 
r THE WITNESS: | 

u | 3 

i It would be my opinion that the blacks would have 

 § difficulty winning in the City wide elections. 

ar? § Q And you have expressed the view that there is a 

A need for a single member districts in the context of 

3 Mobile school board, is that correct? 

F A I don't know whether I said there is a need, but I | 

: said I was not opposed to that view point. 

¥ Q All right. Mr. Alexander, are you aware of the : 
i 

7 legislation that was passed in 1964 that set up a mayor | 
“ ; 

2 council form of government that could be adopted by the 

§ City of Mobile and was put to the voters in 19737 
B 

o 3 A I am vaguely aware of it. I am not sure of those 

% 

i dates. 

i Q Were you active in Mobile politics in 19647 

| A To a very limited extent. I had one congressional 
y ] 

: race. | 
was : -u | 

i R09 |            



  

  

  

    

              

—a 602 

A To the best of my ability, yes. 2 

Q What percentage of the school children in public 4 BY MR. 

schools of Mobile County are black? i Q 

A I suspect forty-five percent at this time. 3 oXd. 

Q Do you consider that there are in the normal : area. 

voter's mind different considerations applicable to the ¢ high s 

dus eston of for whom they shall vote in school board elections refrig 

from those involved in that determination as to the } fifty- 

person for whom they will vote in the City Commission : He is 

elections? is a t 

A I would think so. There is a lot more interest in A 

a City Commission race than in a school board race. THE CC 

Q Normally, aren't the school board races fought out 

on claims of who is and who isn't very interested in A 

school children and desirable of giving them good education MR. ME 

and things of that sort? Q 

| A Yes. neighkt 

Q And in City Commission races hasn't it been the ; A 

practice over the years for various candidates to try to ; Q 

tout: themselves as good, experienced businessmen, successful ; A 

in the management of enterprises and things of that sort? Q 

A Along with considerable other claims. 1 A 

MR. ARENDALL: | Q 

No further questions. i in the 

. <10 

{      



  

  

  
  

  

  
        

Ln la et a ah ne 
¢ DIRECT EXAMINATION 

le 1 BY MR. MENEFEE: 

£ Q This is Mr. John Randolph. He is sixty-one years 

4 old. He lives at 377 Bay Bridge Road in Magazine, Plateau 

: area. He is married and has three children. He attended 

€ i high school and received a diploma in air conditioning and 

lections refrigeration. Mr. Randolph has lived in Mobile County for 

: fifty-seven years. He is the owner of Randolph Variety Store. 

; He is a trustee for the First Hopefield Baptist Church. He | 

$ is a third degree mason. 

t in i A That's right. 

THE COURT: 

out Is your residence in Mobile? 

A Yes, sir. | 

ation MR. MENEFEE: | 

Q Mr. Randolph, at the present time do you have a | 

neighborhood civic club or organization? | 

.e | A Yes, we do. | 

to : Q What is the name of your organization? | 

essful f A It's the Plateau Progressive Civic League. | 

rt? Q How long has that been in operation? 

1 A Approximately two years. 

Q I see. Prior to that, wate there other organizations 

H in the neighborhood that worked with civic problems? | 
ORR | 

3 231 Fs ru 

3 

g     
 



618     

  

of seven hundred feet or are there some instances where it 

is greater distances? 

THE WITNESS: 

Some instances is greater distances. 

THE COURT: 

Seven hundred feet is the smallest distance? I am 

Crying to get a range of distances on the street that do not 

have fire hydrants available to them. 

THE WITNESS: 

I would say it averages around seven hundred feet. 

THE COURT: 

All right. Proceed. . 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Mr. Randolph, I believe one time you mentioned some 

instances to me of drainage problems being so bad that 

it was washing bodies out of a neighborhood cemetary there, 

do you remember that? 

A Yes, it has gotten that bad. 

qQ Before you go on, would you tell me when this was 

occurring; if this was in the last couple of years that you 

had this type of problem? 

THE COURT: 

How long ago did that occur? 

THE WITNESS: 

          12.   
i
 

T
R
A
 

S
L
 

a
 
S
R
G
 
T
o
n
e
 

SR
 

BR
 
b
n
 

f
r
 

  

  

  

  

  

  

       



  

a it 

do not 

eet. 

some 

here, 

was 

t you   

  

PA
TI
L 

Sa
 

ap
 

H
t
 

i 
gE 

: 
P
E
R
S
 A
 

a
e
 

  

  

  

Oh, I would say within the last three years, I would 

say that. Between the last three years. The water that 

comes from the Plateau area crosses Bay Bridge and it crosses 

the Bay Bridge cutoff. It passes along the line of the 

Plateau Cemetary and that is the area that we have been able 

-- we have tried to get cleared up when it crosses Tenth 

Street. That is where it is cut off and it backs up there 

and causes quite a bit of damage to people who live along 

that area in that particular spot. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Mr. Randolph, I believe you also told me that one   
of the major concerns of the neighborhood has been the park | 

and recreation facilities. Would you describe the his or 

behind that problem? 

A Well, we were interested in a park, and of course, 

there was a portion of land donated to the City of Mobile 

  for parks. And it has approximately two acres, I imagine, 

two and-a-half acres. We felt that that was inadequate to 

serve the community. And we consulted the City Commission 

on this and we was told to try to find a more suitable site. 

Of course, we proceeded to try to do the same. So, 

at that particular time we were told that there was approxi- 

  mately a hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars available 

to purchase a suitable site. And of course while we | 
    Re TT
 

on
     Z13'% 

 



  

  

  

was looking for a suitable site, then we was told that the 

hundred and twenty-five thousand dollars had gotten lost in 

bureaucracy or something. I don't recall whether they used 

that term or not, but it got lost. So we had to stop there. 

We had hoped to have some type of recreation that 

would give us a year around recreational facility out there 

instead of just summer activities and everything is closed 

down. 

In this particular ward out there, ninety-nine 

four, there is approximately ten thousand or more residents 

in that area. And certainly a space of one or two or three 

acres in our judgement cannot accomadate that many childre 

or older people, too, for that matter. That won't give them 

the recreational facilities that we require. 

Q How long has the neighborhood been seeking these 

recreational facilities from the time that you are talking 

about? 

A We are talking about a period of seven years. 

Q Has the neighborhood been active in making requests 

to City government to help them with all of these problems 

that you have talked about, the drainage, the streets, the 

hydrants, has this been a contimuing matter over the years? 

A Yes. I am sure the records will show that they have 

been consulted. As it relates to these previous -- 

        14   
  

  

R
N
A
 

Sa
t 

Win
s 

  
  

  

Q 

gover 

THE C( 

  

       



ing 

ests 

ems 

the 

ars? 

have 

    

  
0
 

[§
) 

{
a
a
 

  

    

  
    

Q Has there been previous meetings with the City 

government and the Commissioners during this period of time? 

A Well, I would say there has been a number of meetings 

down there trying to get some of these things corrected. 

Q Now, do you think that they have treated you fairly 

over the years, Mr. Randolph? 

A No, I don't think so.   
Q What did you get out of these meetings with the : 

City government? 

AC; Well, as the saying goes a lot of promises at 

election time and that is just about it. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

That is all your Honor. 

THE COURT: 

You may cross him. 

CROSS EXAMINATION   

BY MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Mr. Randolph, did you live in the Plateau area in 

19687 | 

A Yes, sir, 1 did. | 

Q Did I understand you to say that in the course of 

your interrogation by Mr. Menefee that the streets were all 

paved out in that area? : | 
  

        215° pL



  

  

You told that gentleman that, didn't you? 

A That's right. 

Q Do you happen to know whether the following streets 

were not paved as of August 13th 1968; Greens Alley, Woods 

Lane, Adams Lane, Jones Lane, Edwards Avenue, Brian Street, 

Semmerland Lane, Josie Lane, Wallie Lane, the east end of 

Btveids Street, the east end of Summer Street, the east end 

of Bay Bridge Road and east part of Front Street? 

Were they all unpaved as of 19687? 

A I would say so, yes. 

Q So, there has been some improvement in street 

pavement in that area since 1968 has it not? 

A It has. 

Q You mentioned improvement in the lighting, too, 

haven't you? The lighting? 

A Oh, yes, it has been some improved. 

Q Now, as a matter of fact you have known Commissioner 

Mims for years, haven't you? 

A Quite a few years. 

Q You have known Mr. Doyle, also? 

A Quite a few years. 

Q Do you happen to know Mr. Greenough? 

A Not as well as I know Mr. Doyle and Mr. Mims. 

Q But you have met with Mr. Doyle for example about 

    
E
S
R
I
 

ow
 

L
a
,
 

a
   

  
        <16   

  

  

H
L
 

o
S
 
A
L
R
 nl

p    

traffic 

or we a: 

police | 

of patr« 

when nee 

THE COUI   
THE COUR 

there? 

A 

    
A
R
R
 

Pi
 

FD
OT
 

y
—
    



  

  

  
  

  

    

  
            

biz. 623. 

5 traffic and other problems in the Plateau area, haven't you? 

| A I have. 

pets 1 Q You have no difficulty getting him to meet with you 

yods : and consider those problems, did you? 

set, : A No, I didn't. 

f k Q You didn't get everything you asked for necessarily, 

end : but you were able to get a meeting and consideration, weren't 

i 
: you? | 

| A I was able to get the meeting. | 

Q Now, what was it that you asked Mr. Doyle to do that 

wasn't done? 

A Well, there was one thing in specific that we haven't | 

or we are but we haven't -- we have been having trouble with 

police protection in that area. We feel like that coverage | 

of patrol is too large in order to give adequate protection | 

when needed. 

oner THE COURT: | 

: | In other words, you mean that they cover too large ne 

; area? | 

A Yes. 

’ THE COURT: 

You don't mean that there are too many of them out 

: there? 

t A That's right. | 

Py    



  

  

They cover too large an area. For instance, sometimes 

when we call a policeman for that area he could be in what 

they call blackjack in Saraland avenue -- in fact I have 

called a number of times when my -- especially when my alarm 

would go off in my store and I have timed it and sometimes it 

takes approximately thirty minutes or more for a policeman 

to arrive on the scene. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Now, Mr. Randolph, I don't want to interrupt your 

account of this, but let me ask you this. Do you happen to 

know how the city determines the number of patrolmen to be 

assigned to a given area of the city? . 

A I don't know that. 

Q Then you do not know whether or not they keep 

statistics on the incidents of crime and determine the number 

of people that patrol that area on that basis? You don't   know anything about that? 

A No. 

Q You just know that you are not satisfied with how long 

it has taken and what you consider to be an adequate soverase) 

isn't that right? 

A Right. 

Q Now, as to Mr. Mims. Have you ever met with Mr. Mims | 

about any of these area problems that you have talked about? 

      
      

218 

RE.     

A
 

I 
S
E
G
 

  

  

  

Plates 

Brin
 

AD
 
A
E
 

2 T
E
 

    a 
P
T
E
    



624 + sa ee 2 cm o - 

me time 

that 

re 

alarm 

mes it 

man 

nto 

be 

B 

  
ow long 

verage | 
| 

: Mims | 

out? 

    

  

3 
1 
rug i 

£ 

+ 
£ 
L 

  

  

625 
  

o
m
e
r
 

e
a
n
 

| 

  

A We have. 

Q When you say we, you are talking about this organiz- 

ation that you had? 

A Well, yes, I can say we or they -- 

Q You have had meetings with Mr. Mims before for your   Plateau Progressive League was formed, didn't you? 

A Oh, sure. 
} 

Q And you had access to him and consideration by him of 

things such as paving and street lighting and so on, haven't 

you? 

A Yes. 

Q And do you happen to know whether the fire underwriters, 
| 
f 

or whatever they are called, were the people that established 

the standards for location of fire hydrants? 

A No, I don't know that it is required in that area. 

Q Now, who is this large land owner that you refer to 

out there? 

A Meaher. 

Q Who? 

A Meaher. 

Q That's Mr. Gus Meaher's family, isn't it? 

A Yes. | 

| How many acres do they own out there? 

2” 
I
E
 

Well, I would say in the corporate area of Mobile 

  

|
 

a
a
n
,
 

5
4
8
 

SR
 

gE
   AEA       

~13-



  

      

county region and this was the survey of Mobile. 

THE COURT: 

General planning agency authorized by whom? 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

State law, your Honor. These regional planning 

agencies took the place of what used to be councils of local 

Sov p Eres They are authorized for planning regions which 

are set up here in Governor Brewer's administration and they 

generally have representation and get money -- 

THE COURT: 

I just wanted to know from what source it comes. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

The next witness is Mr. Austin Pettaway. 

AUSTIN PETTAWAY 
  

the witness, having first been duly sworn to tell the 

truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took the 

stand and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

Would the clerk hand Mr. Pettaway a copy of 

Plaintiff's Exhibit 91. 

Mr. Pettaway, take a look at those papers there. 

  

  

i
 

Va
g 
B
e
 

Ty
 

R
R
 

T
S
,
 

  

      <0   
  

EB
 
A
 

AE
 

i
 

a? 
e
s
?
 

#0
 

  

Q 

Lincol 

servic 

A 

Q 

  

  

  = 
a
k
 

w
i
 

;    



  

          
            

si jer 638 

MR. ARENDALL : 

Let me look at this Exhibit 91, also. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

This is Mr. Austin Pettaway. He is fifty-seven 

years old. He lives at 1528 Lincoln Street in Mobile. He 

local is married and has six children. He has lived in Mobile 

hich County all of this life. He works for the postal service. 

they Is that a correct statement, Mr. Pettaway? 

A That's right. 

THE COURT: 

3 Do you Live in Mobile County? 

A That's right. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Mr. Pettaway, have you and other residents of | 

Lincoln Street been active in trying to change municipal 

11 the | services to other streets for drainage and such? | 

the : | A Yes, I have. For more than fifteen years. 

k, | Q Have you worked actively with Reverand W. T. Smith? | 

: | A That's right. 

: Q I believe you mentioned to me a problem of drainage 

i | in your area? 

4 A Drainage and we also asked for a traffic light. We 

1 haven't got a traffic light out there. The drainage is being 

i worked on now. 

3 og 

| 
 



  

  

P
i
 

a
 

a
 

REN 
MR
 S
G
C
 

A
S
 

53
 

i
i
 

  

  

0 When did they start working on this drainage? 

A I would say about three weeks ago or four weeks ago. 

Q Pre iis these more than fifteen years have you and 

Reverand Smith and others in the neighborhood that with the 

City Commissioners and representatives of the City 

government? 

A That's right. 

Q Now, what was the outcome of most of those meetin gs? 

A Well, most of them was at this time we didn't have 

money for this venture. And then some time it was promised. 

Mr. Mims has been out and looked at our street and he promise 

and that was it. 

Q Do you remember when Mr. Mims came out? 

A No. It was three or four years ago, I think. 

Q © Would you describe the drainage problem to us, please 

A Well, whenever we got a heavy rain the sewer and 

all would back up in our yard. It would wash all of the soil 

out of our yard and everything. The water in the street 

would run up in our yard and wash our yard away. 

Q That Exhibit before you, number 91, are those part 

of the petitions and letters that you and Reverand Smith 

and other residents on behalf of Lincoln Street have 

presented? 

A That's correct. 

  

  

  

  

  
E
E
L
 

RE
 

Q 

Linco] 

A 

Plain 

THE Cf 

  

    RR            



8 ago. 

and 

h the 

tin gs? 

have 

mised. 

oromised 

  

  

  

RT
L 

T
N
 

vp
 

v 
S
H
 

LE
R 

EN
T 

gh
 

Bi 
A 

Fo
 

A
m
y
 

LX
 

X 
3 

a
l
 

G
l
i
e
c
 

ica
 tt

 
ca

y 
EL

I 
Ny

e 
B
r
e
e
d
 
A
 

ou 
p
y
 

  

  

Q You forwarded those on to the city government? 

A That's right. 

Q Do you think that the city government has treated 

Lincoln Street fairly over these fifteen years or more? 

  A No, I don't. 

Q Why do you say that? 

A Because when they say that there is no money available 

and other ventures were being done. Our street was still 

there. 

Q Do you know how big a paving venture this is, how 

much money is jriolved? 

A No, I don't. But they say it will cost twice as | 

much as it would if they had gone ahead and done it when we 

first asked for it. 

Q How long have you heen making this request of the 

city? | 

A ‘Over fifteen years. 

Q If I suggested a figure of about thirty-five thousand 

dollars for this venture, would that sound reasonable? 

A I couldn't say offhand. 

MR. MENEFEE: | 

| Your Honor, we move the admission into evidence of | 

Plaintiff's Exhibit 91, the petitions of Lincoln Street group, 

THE COURT: 

  
    
  

      Zed.



  

  

    
cost of assessment for it? 

A No, sir, that's not fair, that's not right. 

Q You say it's not a fact that quite recently has your 

group been willing to stand any assessment for this work? 

A I told you what we all realize that we had to pay 

an assessment. We realize that, 

THE COURT: 

Were you willing to? 

THE WITNESS: 

We were willing to. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Now, was Mr. Langan sympathetic to your- problems 

out there? 

A He came out after one of the rains and saw what 

kind of condition it was in. 

Q But he didn't get the work done for you? 

A No, he did not. 

Q Are you telling us that Mr. Langan did not get that 

work done for you even though you were willing to stand the 

A No, he did not. 

Q Did you tell us that at that time, you were willing 

to pay the assessments to get the work done that Mr. Langan 

wouldn't do it? 

A No, sir, he did not do it. 

    

  

            ed 

   

B
P
 

WY
 

SO
A 

SO
 

A
A
S
 

e
f
 

ne
 

ST
N 

  

the fac 

1974, +t 

Public 

that le 

A 

Q 

1974, £ 

he refe 

street 

         



  

  

  

    
    

  

    
        

a 4 645 

vr THE COURT: 

s your + What he really wants to know if you are willing to 

rk? : pay the assessment? 

Say ¢ THE WITNESS: 

: That's right. We were willing to pay the assessment. 

(3 MR. ARENDALL: 

; Q Mr. Pettaway, I hand you an Exhibit which has been 

1 marked as Defendant's Exhibit 81. I call your attention to i 

the fact that the top letter on this is dated September 22, | 

: 1974, that is the juris to the Honorable Earl Joiner of the 

ems : Public Works Department., City Hall. 

i Were you a party to that petition referred to in | 
4 

§ that letter? | 

3 A I am not sure. 

He Q Can I call your attention to what appears to be your 

4 signature on the second page. Is that your signature? | 

that 3 A That's my signature. | 

the § 0 And that seeks improvement in your streets out thers. | 

| doesn't it? | 

| jn A That's right. 

ling { Q Now, I call your attention to a letter of November 1, 

ngan 1974, from Mr. Nickel senior engineer to Mr. Joiner, in which 

: he refers to a cost estimate of lowering the existing 

| street and providing new jointed system, curves and gutter and 
. - 

or bre | 
3 

l 
 



646 
  

  

  

pavement estimated to cost forty-two dollars per lineal foot. 

Were you advised of that? 

A Yes, I was. 

Q That is a breakdown of how the cost is computed, is 

it not? 

A That's right. 

Q Now, I call your attention to a letter addressed to 

Mr. Joiner by Richard Smith, City Clerk, in which Mr. Joiner 

is advised that the board € commissioners have asked 

Mr. Joiner to tell the interested parties that the matter has 

been considered by the commissioners and that he, Mr. Joiner, 

is authorized to obtain additional information about the 

matter. Did Mr. Joiner tell you that? 

A No. 

Q Nobody from the City Hall ever told you that the 

commissioners had asked any one to go get additional infor- 

mation? 

A No. 

Q Then on November 7th, a letter from Mr. Richard Smith 

to Mr. T. K. Peevey, Public Works director. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

November 7th of what year? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

Nineteen seventy-four. 

  

        26     
CA
TE
 

I
R
 

S
H
 
S
R
R
 

L
e
 

Rp
 

ti
e 

  

  

  

  

commis 

estims 

five | 

Linco] 

privat 

correc 

are nc 

Strees 

A 

       



  

  
  

  

  

          

ir BU... i mend Sr i ie A ib Ph 1 647 

foot. § Advising, Mr. Peevey quotes, ''The board of 

| commissioners in conference, November 5, 1974, reviewed the 

] estimate you submitted in the amount of thirty-six thousand 

is : five hundred and sixty-six dollars to rework and lower 

Lincoln Street from Stone Street to Dunbar Street." 

: "The Commissioner requests that you advise the interedted 

l to private property owners. The city will not be able to 

viner i correct the situation at this time inasmuch as the monies 

: are not available in the city budget." 

r has Did Mr. Peevey so advise you? | 

viner, A No, I didn't get that. | 

Q Did you understand that the question was money and | 

all you had to do was say that we would stand in assesc<ment 

and they would do it? 

A No, I didn't get that understanding. | 

or- 3 0 All right. Here is a letter dated November 13, 1974) 

] | from Mr. Joiner, of the Public Works Department addressed | 

} to Reverand Smith, he is the one you were working with? | 

Smith| A That's right. | 

| ¥ Q Re: Lowering and repaving Lincoln Street. 

, You observe a reference there to repaving Lincoln | 

h Streen? 

| A Yes. 

) Q Do you know of any reason why Mr. Joiner would have 

oi I ZT |   
 



  

  

  

  

  

      

  

  

  
  

            

; 

648 |E— 

| 
talked about repaving if it had never been paved? Street 

A I don't know why he stated it but it has never been 1/13/7¢ 

paved. 

Q And Mr. Joiner then did as he had been {hstrusted to 1 fact ti 

do. Referred the cost of thirty-seven thousand dollars and ! indeed 

the unavailability of funds? ] agree 

A ; That's right. 1 A 

Q I want to call your attention to a letter dated remembe 

October 27, 1975, from Richard Smith to James T. Chaplin, : THE COl 

assistant engineer. Saying, 'The board of commissioners 

this day and meeting with the delegation of Lincoln Street THE WIT 

instructed you to proceed to initiate a paving improvement | 

venture for Lincoln Street as soon as possible." MR. AR) 

Were you informed that that action was taken? 

A Yes, I was. | A 

THE COURT: | q 

What was that date? || back at 

MR. ARENDALL: i A 

October 27, 1975. | { MR. ARF 

THE COURT: i 

That was in authorization to proceed with work? Q 

MR. ARENDALL: other 

Yes. back ir 

Q Now, there is a notation up in the top, Judge. Lincoln 1 A 

_ R28 i 
i    



een 

-d to 

and 

.Ancoln 

  

    
  

649 
  

Tho
n. 

BIR
 
I
T
S
 

A
R
I
A
 

  

  

P
T
 

    

E
t
 

Ay
 

SE
 
T
R
 

  

  

Street paving improvement venture number one eighty initiated 

1/13/76. 

Now, Mr. Pettaway, I ask you again if it isn't a 

fact that between November of 1974 and October of 1975 and 

indeed only shortly before October of '75 did you people 

agree to send assessments for having this work done? 

A I don't remember no one kicking on it. I don't 

remember no one kicking on the assessment. 

THE COURT: 

Do you remember an affirmative agreement? 

THE WITNESS:   No, I don't. 

MR. ARENDAIL: 

And you do expect to be assessed, now? 

A That's right. 
| 
i 

q And you didn't expect to be assessed in the negotiations 

back at any time before that, did you? 

A I did, and I think the group did. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

I offer this Exhibit. 

Q Mr. Pettaway, you have referred to the facts that 

other areas in the City were paved since you started talking 

back in 1961 to the city commission? 

  A That's right. 

    FARES Mae ye i :     —29



  

  

    

      
  

      
    

  
          

—t650— 

Q And the time that you actually got it? E 

Do you know the circumstances under which that other i THE WIT 

paving was done? Whether it was on an assessment basis or it 
: 3 

by some dividers who were paying for it themselves or MR. ARE 

otherwise? : 
g 

A No, I do not. All I saw was that the paving venture 4 MR. ME! 
§ 

: hy | 

wag going on. 1} 

MR. ARENDALL: : : THE COL 

| No further questions. : y 
| 5 

MR. MENEFEE: i 

No further questions. MR. MEI 

MR. ARENDALL: 

| -Judge, I overlooked the traffic lights. 

Do you know what the procedure followed by people 

where people want traffic lights? 

A No, I don t. But I was sent to Mr. Bradford. 
the tn 

Q It is checked into by the traffic engineer at 
|| the st. 

City Hall, isn't it? 

A I was sent to Mr. Bradford and Mr. Bradford is an | 

engineer, wasn't he? p BY MR. 
x Q 

Q Right. He makes certain tests such as volume of ) 
i | She 11 
traffic and number of wrecks and that kind of stuff to determine | 

% Mobile 

whether or not a traffic light should be put in . il 

THE COURT: 1 
- Ya | high s 

_ R30 E13 
#    



  

      
      

  

  

  

    
      

ween lS 0 eee 1©O1 

3 ‘Did he advise you of those things? 

“her : THE WITNESS: 

=T 4 Yeah, he did. 

| MR. ARENDALL: 

: No further questions. 

ure { MR. MENEFEE: 

5 ‘No further questions. 

; THE COURT: 

: You may step down. 

Who will you have next? 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Mrs. Mable Dotch . 

| 

MABLE P. DOTCH 

. the witness, after having first been duly sworn to cell 

the truth, the whele truth, and nothing but the truth, took 

| the stand and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 

\ BY MR. MENEFEE: 
{ Q This is Mrs. Mable P. Dotch . She is sixty years old. 

: \ She lives at 2529 First Avenue in the Trinity Gardens area of 

“ermine 
A Mobile. 

She is a widow and has fourteen children. She atténded 

Cal 2 | high school. She has lived in Mobile County all of her life. | 

ina ~ 23 Spe    



  

    
  

  

    
  

  

  

  

  

el a pt fe a 2 

4 
your community? Q 

A Well, we have poor drainage. At one time they did H A 

put in some drainage. . they 

THE COURT: | sis MR. b 

What he wants you to do is tell how it affects where Q 

you live. ; 3 A 

THE WITNESS: : : Q 

Oh, its bad. ; ; Trini 

THE COURT: : A 

Tell us what you mean by bad. -~ WE 

THE WITNESS: open 

When it rains, it gets up and floods the street. You Q 

| have to wade down the street if you want to cross it. Cars reque 

| get stuck. First Avenue and Jessie Street flood too, and the prob] 

| water stands there so that if a car on Jessie Street will A 

| drown out. Q 

I THE COURT: it gc 

Mobile has a general flooding problem. How long does iA 

the water stand after these tremendous downpours that we have} t | were 

| A They stand for hours hecause I have a business on : THE C 

| the corner and water comes in there and we have to close. | 

| THE COURT: A 

Water comes inside the building? Q 

I A Yes. Bi A 

fis oF         
     



did 

where 

» havef   
  

656 
  

—
 
i
 

. 

  

  

  
  

Q 

Q 

A 

they don't come inside of mine. 

What about the homes? 

Some of the people's homes, the water comes in but 

  
MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Is this always a problem in the Trinity Gardens area? 

A Yes. 

Q How i8 water carried away? Is there big ditches in 

Trinity Gardens? 

A Yes, we have large ditches. And some of the ditches 

-- we have some pipe in some of the ditches. Some are still | 

open with no drainage pipes in them. 

Have you and other people in Trinity Gardens been 

requesting che City Commission to help you with this drain-2-= 

problem? 

A 

Q 

L] 

Yes. | 

How many years are we talking about, Mrs. Dotch? Is 

it going back to the fifties or the early sixties? 

A Yes, its' going back a long time. Ever since we 

were incorporated in the City. 

THE COURT: 

How long has that been? 

I can't say. 

MOre than ten years? 

I can't say exactly when. 

      233 

r
r
 

f
m
 

—



684 
  

  

  

  
  

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

Q This is Mrs. Janice M. McCamts. She is twenty- 

two years old. She lives at 959 Ghent Street in Maysville 

area of Mobile. She is single and she has attended three 

years of college. She has lived in Mobile all of her life. 

| Is that correct, Mrs. McCamts? 

A Yes, it is. 

Q Miss McCamts, have you been active in the neighborho 

organizations dealing with, I believe, traffic and some 

drainage problems? 

A . Yes, not only that, but it's other things that 

are happening in the community that shouldn't be. 

THE COURT: 

What community is that? 

A Maysville. 

THE COURT: 

Ma'am? 

A Maysville. 

THE COURT: 

Now, gentlemen, can you tell me where that part of 

Mobile, Maysville, is? 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

That is behind the Ladd Stadium, roughly. 

  
      34.   

    

>
 

  

i
h
 

  
F
R
E
 Se
 
T
t
 

1 
R
a
a
   

  

 



fe. 

sorho 

of 

pd 

  
  

T
R
 

A
 

A 

  

  

    

  

  
(+
) 

{ L 

  

THE COURT: 

That would be more or less in the southern part. 

  
All right. 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Q Miss McCamts would you describe the traffic problems 

that you have been dealing with? 

A We have been having trouble with the company that 

has been of the area for some years. I believe it's over 

twenty something years. They are a hazard to the neighbor- 

hood because we have children all around there. There is a 

school zone right there in the neighborhood. That extends for 
| 

a couple of blocks that the schools are in. This truck 
‘ ; | 

company is right there at the corner of my street. Thereioure 

they use my street and other streets in the area for traffic 
{ 
{ 

going to their business. For loading zone and carrying out | 
| 
i 

and bringing in, you know, that type of business. 

Q Have you or other members of the organization | 

attempted to contact the city government to see if they would 

help you alleviate this problem? | 

A Yes, we have. We have gotten up petitions asking | 

for help to prevent this hazard to the community. As far as| 

disturbance or parking area and of course speed of the   
trucks and the loading. The loading is so heavy that we have 

had this particular thing that happened. A truck that had | 
eee ian rm eee ee 

  

35 | 

 



b 

i 

  

686 
  

  

  

  

this accident on the street that was turning over. The child 

had just gotten out of school, so therefore any child could 

have gotten hurt and any matter. Because of this lumber that 

was falling over on the side in people's yards and everything 

The trucks are falling over -- I mean the lumber 

falling into the drainage which did happen, too. Because 

the drainage -- we have a problem as far as streets are 

overflooding because the drainage isn't properly -- whatever. 

But, anyway, we have no sidewalks. When you are 

going to and from school or your place of business or home 

or to the store, you don't have anywhere to walk, 

As far as the cars coming by when the streets are 

flooded and spill water all over every one by speeding throug 

the streets, you know. 

Q How many schools are there in your neighborhood? 

A How many? 

Q Are there several, would you name some? 

A Yes. There are Williamson High School that is right 

next to a track which is a big ditch there. 'The railroad 

track is right there and it doesn't have sufficient lighting 

or warning of the train that is coming. 

Also cars have fallen in that ditch. 

It is so deep that it can hold a whole car. 

Around Williamson High School, there is George 

ren 

  

236   
  

  

  

  

+ 
18
4 

  

} 
| 

a
 

N
A
R
 R
A
 

  

      
  

  

    

  

n  



  
  

  

  
        

  
            

686 | 687 

» children ! Hall Tlementary High School. We have another one a couple 

ould : of blocks or so the other way, west, I believe. 

r that Q The second one you mentioned was George -- 

“ything | A George Hall Elementary. 

a : Q There are quite a few children in the neighborhood 

18e ; in these schools? 

> | A Yes, there are many children in the neighborhood. 

atever. g ; There are still children in the neighborhood that haven't 

re | reached the age of one year of age. 

nome i Q And in your attempts to contact the city government | 

i have you been able to suggest an alternate route? | 

RYe ; A Yes, we have. We suggested a route. We drew to | 

through 5 their attention what would be better for them and building. J 

‘ They are expanding so much. The ground that they are holding 

d? i is pathetic. The houses in that area -- you can't sit on vib 

? porch. There wasn't -- there is a hazard of dust all over | 

; the furniture. You can't open doors or anything. This kind 

right | | of thing is hazardous to your health as far as children as 

oad | | [welt | 
ghting i | Q Is that a result of large trucks stirring up the 

| dust? ! 

: A Right. Also, at one part of the intersection in the 

street they put a sign there for no parking for the cars. 

Wherefore, their trucks can get through there and go to 

        
 



  

  

  

  

    
  

    

  

  
  

  
    

| 

fom mie 688 

their grounds. t -= br 

1 Q I see. So, the city put up no parking signs? : clea 

A Yes, at a corner so that no cars could park where b there 

their trucks -- and those trucks make that big turn there j This 

so they can go into their ground. . § Q 

The schools are right there in that ares. There : situs 

are children right there in that street where they are making i A 

| that big turn. : "done 

! They are coming all times of the night, every day, they 

all night long. No matter whether it is the weekend or week s 

not. ‘Sac. these people ~-- these people don't have to stay 4 Q 

| in this area. : iE A 

Q You mean the company? i has a 

| A Yes. 4 " th 

| Q Is this Government Street Lumber Company that you are k | hole 

I spraking of? 1 ‘the s 

i A Yes, Government Street Lumber Company and that -- Lr work 

there is this ail company next to it. That whole area -- So, t 

| it was ~-- it was packed off with trucks and trailers and | | you h. 

| whatever. It's a hazard because you can't see around the | busin 

corners. 

: There is dust and there is grass growing up so high. i Q 

I They haven't even taken care of it. As far as -- I don't ' i sidew: 

know about the city -- grounding the area -- what they call : | along 

i By : 

| os | 4     a  



sre 

"OU ary   
    

    

  

re 
se

r 
—
c
—
.
 

o£ 
Ae

 
S
B
 

  

  

  

-=- but just the same. The company hasn't made any move to 

~ clear this stuff themselves. Anything that comes out of 

there as far as animals and snakes and this kind of thing. 

This is the weather that they will come out. 

Q Has the city government done anything to help the 

situation? 

A No, they haven't. The only thing that they have 

dotie =~ they ignore what the traffic. Even though -- well, 

they have one truck that comes through apprdximately two 

weeks in a month they clean the sidewalks. Therefore, -- 

Q The sidewalks? 

A Yes, the sidewalk. The streets are torn apart. It 

has a child going out playing in the streets or going out 

in the street they could easily get their foot caught in a 

hole in the street. Whereas these trucks has breaking in 

‘the streets and the City might go in and do some kind of 

work along in the streets and just- patch the streets up. 

So, the cars would have no way of running so long because 

you have problems with the cars having to carry them to a 

business to get them fixed. All of this kind of thing. 

With the drainage and this kind of thing. 

Q I am a little confused, Miss McCamts. Is there 

sidewalks in this neighborhood, or. int? You said they come 

along and clean the sidewalks? 

  
  

  

689 

    239



  

  

  

  

  

MORNING SESSION 
  

July 19, 1976 

THE COURT: 

All right. Whom will the Plaintiff have? 

MR. MENEFEE: 

Clara Ester. : 

CLARA ESTER 
  

the witness, having first been duly sworn to tell 

the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, took 
. 

the stand and testified as follows: 

DIRECT EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. MENEFEE: 

0 This is Mrs. Clara Ester, twenty-eight years old 

and lives at 705 She is single. Fisher Street in Crichton. 

She has a B.A. Degree in elementary education and has lived 

in Mobile County for six and-a-half years. She is presently 

employed with the Dumas - Westley Center, a neighborhood 

service organization funded by the United Fund and the 

Methodist Church that operates in the Crichton neighborhood; 

is that a correct statement, Mrs. Ester? 

A Yes, it is. 
      wa0   

    

  

     

1h
 

fia
 

+ 
x 

A
R
E
 

x p
o
m
p
 ar
e 

ce
n 

2% 
W
E
 

TE
 

h o 
R
S
E
 

IES 
EA
E 

S
E
I
 

  

      
  

descrf 

the Cr 

you te 

Cricht 

A 

arrivi 

area, 

each r 

where 

the bo 

that a 

are ev 

drowni 

the cr 

report 

that 1 

the bo 

creek . 

always 

playin: 

ago we 

 



706 
  

  

Q Mrs. Ester, in our previous conversations you have 

p'clock, described some of the drainage problems that are common in 

the Crichton neighborhood, property erosion and such. Would     
you tell us the types of problems the neighborhoods in the 

Crichton neighborhood experience? 

A Well, even before I came to Mobile I heard, after 

  

  arriving in the City of Mobile and working in the Crichton   area, that several homes were on the edge of the creek and 

each rain flow the erosion is like falling into the creek 

ell where homes, at this point, are getting closer and closer to. 

took the boundary point. | 

A lot of home owners are fearful and even people 

r 

Li 

k 

fig 
k 
hd 
i 
3 5 

{ 
| 

that are renting are becoming very fearful that their homes 

e
r
s
 

rae 
M
e
 
a
f
 

are eventually going to fall into the creek. There have been| 
|   F

h
 

E
E
S
 

Rar 
A
n
 

I 
se
 

drowning situations where people in the area have rowed gem | 

W
Y
 

a | the creek trying to find kids. | 

Other problems have been one case we worked on and | 

| reported to the Board of Health was menigitis where a family | 

that lives above the creek, all the children were ill and 

the board of health indicated that it was probably from that 

creek area that this disease was being carried. Rats are   hood | always in the creek and mosquitoes and kids are in and out 
ood; 

playing in it and slip and fall into it. About four years     ago we talked to Mayor Mims about fencing in the creek or | 

25 
    

| 

 



  

  

putting some type of piping in to close the creek up to 

prevent any more drownings or diseases that the creek is 

creating in that community. He indicated to about twelve 

people, I guess, in his office that they could not baby sit 

by putting fences up. They couldn't send people out to watch 

the kids and prevent them from getting into the creek. We 

felt it was a minor thing to fence the area up. 

Q Have there been any major improvements in the 

situation? 

A No major improvements. They have been out to -- 

maybe twice to clean it in six and-a-half years. 

Q You also described once to me a request, I believe, 

for an alternate route or rearranged route with the bus 

service to assist some elderly citizens in the neighborhood. 

What was the problem that they faced? 

A Well, the Toulminville bus comes up Mobile Street 

and, in the past, it used to turn on Nall Street and go to 

Bay Shore Avenue, coming back north and then circling back 

around to the Toulminville area. Senior citizens in the 

area would have to walk from Nall Street up at least four 

blocks and then up an incline to get to Springhill Avenue 

to catch any type of bus to take them to town. There are so 

many old people in the Crichton community that it became a 

very serious problem for them with heart conditions and other 

  
        . <A4R   

S
e
 

R
R
P
 

R
A
T
 

wy
 

i 
De 

We
 

. 

   

s
o
 

i 
i" 

  

n
s
 
S
E
X
 
p
a
 

5 

  

  

- 
a
i
m
 

TY 
Si
ge
 

L
i
 

  

    

  

build 

   



Leve, 

wood. 

    
  

™ 
or

 
r
n
 

w
n
 

A
 

ora
 

Sp
er
 

Xe
 

r
e
 
w
e
 

E
A
C
 

a
d
 

~ 
r
e
y
 

711 
  

    

  

A It is in the area of Liberty Park which is also 

-in Crichton. 

Q Does the Crichton Optimist Club have use of that 

park or that area? 

A To my understanding they do, right. 

Q In the recent past, has the Crichton Optimist 

Boy's Club been segregated? 

A Up to about two years ago. We have had kids to go 

up to join because it was where we considered closer, as 

far as recreational facilities. They were denied the 

opportunity to join there, but was told if they went to 

Davis Avenue, they could become members of the Boy's Club 

there. 

Q Has the Boy's Club operated a lunch program during 

the summer in the past? 

A For at least four summers that I was aware of, 

yes. 

Q You described to me previously the situation of 

black children not being able to obtain lunches on an equal 

basis with white children. 

Would you tell me about that, please? 

A Well, number one, they wouldn't be allowed in the 

building any way, and the lunches that were left over that 

  

243 

  
| 

| 
| 

  
betta spre — ar ———— 

 



711 
  

  

  

  
  

the white kids could not consume during the day, that had 

to be eaten or was spoiled, they would be set out on the 

curb. I don't know if they were set out there for the black 

kids to eat or set out there for garbage, but yet the black 

kids would easily go to that area and get them a lunch and 

go home. 

Q This Boy's Club on Rice Street is now used as a 

voting center? 

A Right. 

Q And it serves the Trinity Gardens area, also, I 

believe? 

A Right. 

Q Would you describe some of the difficulties for 

citizens getting from Trinity Gardens over to the voting 

place at the Boy's Club on Rice Street? 

A They would have to come down St. Stephens Road 

and possibly pick up the Toulminville, Allison bus and get 

off at Cotton Street and, at that point, have to walk twelve 

blocks or so to get there. When I have been at the polls at 

six- o'clock taking people from Crichton, people to vote, 

several people from Trinity Gardens have walked up to there 

at six-fifteen and they would not get the freedom to vote, 

because of the hour situation. 

Q Prior to the Trinity Gardens citizens voting at the 

    a4   
  

  

    

3 
‘we 

§ 
x 

    

    

Boy's 

A 

Q 

A 

Q 

diffi 

have 

A 

Q 

A 

is no 

Q 

A 

in th. 

They + 

to oti 

you ki 

a gre: 

the si 

Unive 

no pl: 

the t: 

 



711 

  
    

712 
  

a 
| 

w
r
 

e 
§ 

os
 
G
e
s
 

VEN
 

W
t
 

T
e
 

A
 

2
 

a
 

P
I
 

F
P
,
 

a 
> 

L
E
 

ev
 

a 
E
R
E
 
M
a
 

SE
 

3 
LN
 

B
o
e
r
 
A
 

d
y
 
e
T
 

  

    

  
  

Boy's Club, did they vote in their own neighborhood? 

A Yes. 

Q At the Trinity Gardens School? 

A Right. 

Q So, thereafter, would you say that it was very 

difficult for a citizen of Trinity Gardens, if they don't 

have private transportation to vote at the Boy's Club? 

A I would say that it is very difficult. 

Q Are there many sidewalks in the Crichton neighborhoc 

A Probably you could count them on one hand. There 

is not a whole lot of sidewalks in the area, no. 

  
  Q Why are sidewalks important in yout net ghborhoad? 

A Number one is because kids that are growing up 

in that community are basically from low ineome families. | 

They don't have adequate transportation to transport kids 

to other parks like Municipal or other parks that are, 

you know, surrounding them. So, the kids play in the street] 

a great deal, which is not to any degree a safe situation. | 

Even Mobile Street is a very busy street. That is 

the street the amublance goes down, as far as going to the 

University Medical Center. So, the kids had to play with 

no place to ride bikes and they end up in the streets all 

the time. 

1 feel that it is a dangerous situation. If the 

d? 

  

1 1a      



  

  

  

  
  

  

sidewalks were available, the kids would be in a little 

safer area. There is no basic recreation for them where they 

can walk comfortably to a program. 

Q In a neighborhood such as Crichton is there also 

a good bit ~-- neighborhood interchange and foot traffic 

by the citizens? 

A "Yes. People walk all the time. People sit on the 

porch and communicate with each other. This is their 

livelihood. This is basically all they can afford to do. 

Q Have most or all of these problems been called to 

the attention of the city government? 

A The majority of them, yes. : 

Q Over a period of time, several years or more? 

A I would say for the six and-a-half years I have 

been here. 

Q What sort of response have you got? 

A Well, they send someone out to clean the creek 

during election time. You have a lot of city trucks in the 

area looking around. The basic problems that have been 

indicated to the city have not been solved. 

Recreation is still not in the Crichton community. 

The creek problems are basically there. They may have come 

out and cleaned the creek, yet the same type of situations 

are going on, menigitis, kids falling into the creek and 

713 

    _ 46   
W
P
 

Re
s 

  

owed 

  

  

  

  

    
   



the 

to 

the 

    
  

    

—
—
 

al
 

Pi
g 
P
A
N
G
 

OR 
a 

ne r
a
i
 

p
—
 

714 
  

I
 

R
E
 

w
n
 

T
e
 

I
R
 

T
P
R
 

i
 

Ad
 

YO
RE
 

| 
nit

e 
S
E
C
 S
R
 

  

  

    

houses in danger of their homes being washed away and so the 

problems are still there. 

Q Have you ever met with members of the City 

Commission? 

A I have met with Mr. Mims as well as Mr. Greenough. 

Q Did you have a great deal of difficulty speaking 

with these commissioners? 

A The one occasion that I met with Mr. Mims, the 

difficulty was the fact that we had brought several people 

from the community to speak with them, and they found it 

a big problem to seat every body. We felt like if people 

could come in the room and stand that was important that 

they hear what he had to say about the issues that they 

brought to them. He did meet with us, yes. 

Q You have certainly been in other parts of the City. 

Do you think your neighborhood has received equal treatment 

with white neighborhoods? 

A No, 1 do not. 

Q Would you describe the racial make-up of the 

Crichton neighborhood? 

A I world say Crichton, at this point, is probably 

sixty - forty with the majority being black. 

Q And are those doncentratad in certain areas or 

particular areas of the Crichton neighborhood, the blacks? 

  

  
    R47 - 

 



  

  

  

       
    

  

      
  

  
  

        

26K 

BILL ROBERTS § House 

the witness, after having first been duly swern 4 presen 

to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, i Q 

took the stand and testified as follows: i A 

2 
DIRECT EXAMINATION ii is pre 

BY MR. BLACKSHER: i Alaban 

1 qQ State your name and address, .please. 4 that t 

i A Bill Roberts, 148 Tuscaloosa Street, Mobile. ; A 

Q How old are you, Mr. Roberts? kd number 

A Thirty-five. ig really 

Q What is your present employment? i 

A Vice-president of Cogburn Nursing Home. hasn't 

Q How long have you resided in Mobile? I will 

A Thirty-five years. number 

| q That is your whole life? Q 

A That's right. ¥ propos 

| Q What elective office do you presently hold? A 

A State Senate district thirty-five. ; a peti 

Q That is the State of Alabama? ? City c 

A That is correct. : the cc 

Q Would you briefly describe your history of involve- i on the 

ment in politics in Mobile County? . the Ci 

1 A In 1970 I was elected county wide to the Alabama i ment . 

| _ 248 oe 
- '  



726 
  

lve-   
  

727 
  

H
R
 

Yp
——

——
— 

re
 

op
ty
 

L
i
a
 

ue 
SA

P A
R
R
E
 

w
y
 

Aa
h 

ty 
a 

T
E
 

RE 
E
E
 

Ae
 

£
8
 

tp
 

Ho 
nd
 
ve
er
 

I
E
 

    

House of Representatives and in 1974 I was elected to my 

present position in the Alabama Senate. 

Q You ran in the Democratic primary? 

A That is correct. 

Q Senator Roberts, you are the sponsor of a bill that 

is presently pending in the Senate of the legislature of 

Alabama that concerns city government in Mobile. Waat is 

that bill number? 

A The bill number is -- you know, I forgot the bill 

number. We have something like thousands of bills. 1 

really don't know, right off the top of my head, what it is. 

The reason that I don't know what it is, there 

hasn't been a great deal of action on the bill recently. 

I will have to check. I really don't know what the bill 

number is. 

Q Would you describe, please, what this bill 

proposes to do with the city government in Mobile? 

A Well, essentially, it would provide, based upon 

a petition and a public referendum, it would provide the 

City of Mobile with a mayor-council form of government and 

the council would be made up of nine members. It is based 

on the -- essentially, the same legislation that provides 

the City of Birmingham with a mayor-council form of govern- 

ment. 

  

      <49



728 
  

  

Q This would be a form different from the mayor 

alderman form presently contained in the general laws of 

Alabama? 

A That is correct. 

Q You would have a mayor running at large, correct? 

A That is correct. 

Q | How would the council members, the nine council 

members, be elected under your bill? 

A Seven of the council members would be elected from 

districts and two of the council members would be elected 

at large, city wide. 

Q Mr. Clerk, would you hand the witness exhibit 

62, and Plaintiff's Exhibit 63, please. 

May it please the Court, Plaintiff's Exhibit 63 

is a summary prepared by Mobile United of a debate that 

occurred there on May 28, 1976, I believe; isn't that 

correct, Mr. Roberts? 

A That is correct. 

Q In which Mr. Roberts participated with Mr. Ed 

Thornton and Professor William J. Harkins. 

Mr. Roberts...... 

THE COURT: 

What number is that? 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

        _ R30   

  

  

  

  

that 3 

A 

is the 

govert 

having 

local 

have 1 

ment 

disads 

counc 

that 

govert 

towarc 

exist: 

form 

indiv: 

opport 

Unite 

wider 

of the 

had. 

   



ct? 

from 

    
    

x i 
} 

  

P
R
R
 

B
A
 

129 
  

    

Sixty-three. Would you tell the Court two reasons 

that you have introduced this bill? 

A Well, basically, the two reasons -- the major reason 

is that, in my own opinion, the mayor council form of 

government is a better form of government. I say that after 

having served almost two years now as the chairman of the 

local government committee in the Alabama Senate. So, I 

have become somewhat familiar with forms of muncipal govern=   
ment and I think that, of course, there are advantages and 

disadvantages to the various forms. 
| 

| 
In my opinion, the strongest form is the mayor- | 

council and I think this is probably indicated by the fact | 

that a majority of the cities in Alabama have this foru o- 

government and over the last ten years they have been Poving) 

toward this form of government and this situation also 

exists on a national level. 

The second reason is I feel, under the present 

form of government, the commission form of government, the 

individuals or all segments of the city do not have an 

opportunity to be represented. So, I said at the Mobile 

United meeting and I repeat again that this bill will give 

wider representation, in my opinion, to the various segments 

of the city than the present form of government that we have 

had. 

  

251    



      

    
  

  

  

Q How would it accomplish better representation? 

A Well, under the present system you have three 

commissioners that run city wide, that run at large, and 

under the mayor council you would have a mayor that would 

run at large and you would have at least seven councilmen 

that would be running from districts. I think it is 

quire obvious that you would have more individuals involved 

in mmicipal government than you presently have, although 

they would be involved at a different level than you have 

now. 

It would be an executive - legislative situation, 

whereas, at the present time, you have, whichever way you 

want to look at it, either an executive or legislative 

situation. You do not have the checks and balances provided 

by a legislative - executive arrangement. 

Q Why have you proposed that two of the council 

members run at large in seven districts? 

A Well, hasically, two reasons; one, is that I would 

hope that this was something that I hoped that with certain 

established members of the community would be -- find more 

acceptable, and the second reason, would be that having 

experienced the districts...... 

THE COURT: 

When you say more acceptable, you mean make it 

  

    

      PAs Yes   

  

E
M
R
 

sn
 

ST
 

g 

    

  

A 

have 1 

that 

to be 

interes 

two cc 

place 

that ¢ 

concer 

that e 

member 

at ‘it 

 



uld 

men 

plved 

ugh 

Rve 

ion, 

you 

yvided 

730 

  

  

  

  

Et nt 

73 
  

easier to pass? 

A That is correct. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

A The situation that we have in the legislature, we 

have had some difficulty in that in running from districts 

that the legislators have had a tendency, in some instances, 

to be concerned just with their particular district and the 

interests of their district and so I felt that by providing 

two councilmen, at large, that any discussion that took 

place on the counell regarding various municipal issues 

that these individuals could provide some balance. 

An individual, for example, with a district, 

concerned with a project just in his district or a situation 

that exists in his district, there would be at least two 

members on the council to provide the prospective of looking 

at it from a city wide point of view. 

Q Was there any other city's modeled like the 

mayor council form that suggested this seven - two council 

to you, or is that your own idea? 

      
  

y A That is my own idea. To my knowledge, I do not 

# i know of any cities that have that arrangement. 

5 Q ~ Now, on the question...., 

i THE COURT:  



  

  
  

  
  

  
  

              

# 

732 

To that extent, it is different from the Birmingham 4 
. 

plan? 
; of citi: 

A: That is correct, your Honor. HE coy 

MR. BLACKSHER : 

Q The question of why the representation was debated ME. BM 

on this occasion at the public forum of Mobile United; is 

that correct? Q 

A That is correct. : Te oon 

Q I believe that the person, Mr. Thornton, who was 

opposing your bill made the point that the present mayor, MR, BLM 

city commission form of government, protects majority control; Q 

is that correct? this de 

A He made that statement. That is correct. bill. wa 

Q And in fact, I believe Mr. Thornton said that among A 

: the bill 
those who favor minority rule we have only Federal judges 

and the present delegation from Mobile County; is that introduc 

earlier, 
correct? 

| A He made that statement. That is correct. the bil} 

MR. ARENDALL: the sfas 
St 1 

If your Honor please, aren't we getting into the BLE je 

t 
rankest kind of hearsay? gental 

THE COURT: its ves 
moved ir 

Well, if this is a debate before the legislature. 

; ] 
MR. ARENDALL: I jot the 

-~ : TE 

Z5Y : 
‘  



ed 

aitrolg 

ong 

  

  

732 

  

    

r
r
 

t
y
 
—
 
E
r
 

——
 
e
e
 

~N
 

Ww
 

  

| No, sir. Before the Mobile United, a local group 

of citizens, 

THE COURT: 

Well, I think it is totally irrelevant any way. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

All right. 

Q Mr. Roberts, haven't you.... 

THE COURT: 

It is argumentative. Go ahead. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q Mr. Roberts, haven't you also said publicly, includij 

this debate, that one of the reasons you introduced this 

bill was the pendency of this law suit? 

A Yes. I do feel that -- I did originally introduce 

the bill for that reason. I intended for sometime to 

introduce the bill, because of the two reasons I stated 

earlier, but it was after that I had decided to introduce 

the bill that I became aware of the law suit. I did make: 

the statement that I felt that too often in Alabama, on the 

State level, particularly, for example, the prisons and the 

mental health situation, that the legislature has not met 

its responsibility and in those situations the courts have 

moved into that area because of the lack of responsibility 

of the legislature. 

2:4 

  

$ 
[3     PAT  



  

  

I have stated on a number of occasions we obviously 

do have a problem here, in my opinion, and we do not have 

representation in all areas of the city and, for that 

reason, I introduce the bill and then I became aware of the 

law suit. 

Q Now, Mr. Roberts, it is a fact, isn't it, that the 

1964 or '65 bill or act that set up the optional form of 

government concerning which there was a referendum in 1973 

differs from your present plan in that the former system had 

a weak mayor council system and also provided for the council 

to run at large and those are two major differences in your 

bill; isn't that correct? : 

A Those are just two, but there is no comparison 

except in name. There is absolutely no comparison between 

the bill that the legislature passed in 1965 and was voted 

on in '73 and the bill that I am proposing. There is 

absolutely no comparison. 

Q Is it a fact that you have proposed that some of 

the council members run out of single member districts in 

order to provide minority groups in the city a better 

opportunity to be represented in the city government? 

A That is correct. 

Q Is it fair to say that since you have been 

associated with the Mobile county legislators that they have 

      296   

734 

    
  

unders 

and to 

be nec 

we ran 

six of 

vicini 

‘situat 

but ne 

We hav 

ment. 

work a 

a youn 

indivi 

wouldn 

respec 

opinio 

Q 

that, 

enac tm 

the bi: 

  

     



  

  

  

  
    
  

      

1 785 
AR 734 = 

vasiy ] understood that in order for blacks actively to be represented 

io 3 and to be able to elect candidates of their choice it would 

1 be necessary for there to be single member districts? 

rhe 1 A Are you referring to my experience with the legisla- 

i ture? 

the : Q Yes. 

. ¥ A Yes. When I served in the House of Representatives 

373 1 we ran county wide and there were ten members of the House, 

% had 1 six of them were attorneys that lived within the immediate 

Suneil § vicinity or the Base neighborhood. Now, under the district | 

iy : ‘situation, which I didn't particularly care for the plan, 

¥ but nevertheless, we had districts and we have a wide range. 

3 We have an individual who is an owner of a cleaning estaniisn- 

oa & ment. We have a man that has been involved in service statioh 

cad 4 work and auto repairs. We have, I think, a black attorney, 

£4 a young white attorney, and so we have a wide range of 

§ individuals that are involved in the legislature now that 

So 5 wouldn't have been involved in years past. So, in that 

'n & respect, legislative re-apportionment has been good, in my | 

Eo opinion. | 

A Q At the end of the Mobile United debate you said 

that, in answer to the question were the prospects for the 

: enactment of your bill not too good, from slim to none, but 

Hate ¢ the bitl right now is being held up in committee by one 

Embers: + IE a |   
 



  

  

  

  

  

senator and is that still the case, Senator Roberts? 

A That is the case, to my knowledge. As you know, we 

have been in recess for one week and unless...... 

Q That one senator is Senator Perloff? 

A That is correct. 

Q Has he told the delegation why he is holding the 

bill up? 

A No. He has not, not to my knowledge. 

Q Do you have any idea? 

A Yes. I have some idea, but I cannot prove that. 

Q It would be hearsay? 

A It would be hearsay; that is coriect but I know why 

it is being held up. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

No further questions. 

THE COURT: 

You may cross him. 

CROSS EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. ARENDALL: 

Q Senator, there has been some testimony here that 

Mr. Buskey would have beat Senator Perloff for the position 

in the State Senate three hundred votes that had been cast 

y In other words, if 

736 

        
©o8 | 

  
  

  

  

R
R
L
 

AA 
A
A
 

  

goverrs 

of Mok: 

did yo 

A 

situat 

the on 

Q 

you fo 

interf 

affair 

A 

did, be 

all far 

mayor. 

and inv 

city. 

be elec 

those b 

Q 
       



  736 - | 738 

governments throughout the state and perhaps the history 

’. we § of Mobile home government under a mayor aldermanic form, 

1 did you not? 

1 A Yes. I centered most of my studies on the Birmingha BH
 

situation and the Montgomery situation, because they were 

” the ones most comparable with Mobile.   Q Is it fair to say that one of the big problems that 

you found with the mayor council form to have was that of !   interference by members of the council in the day to day 

affairs of the municipality? 

A That is why I wrote the bill in the way that I 

w why did, because -- let's take, for example, the one we are 

all familiar with, the city of Prichard. It has a weak 

mayor. There are areas where councilmen can and do interfere! 

and involve themselves in the day to day operations of the 

city. 

Under the bill that I have proposed, even if they 

go or approach a department head, without first going through 

the mayor's office, they can be removed from office.   Q What are other differences? 

¢ 

A The other major difference, the council people would 

be elected from districts and I understand from '63 or '73,   those bills, that that was at large.   
Q I understood you to say, senator, that you patterned 

<59 
          

   



  

  

  
  
    

your bi11 on the Birmingham bill. Does not Birmingham have 

a council where all the members are elected at large? 

A That is correct. And I have a letter from Mayor 

Vann recently where he stated that this was going to be a 

problem for the City of Birmingham. He felt that this was 

definitely a strengthening of the bill to place them in 

districts rather than having them running at large. 

Q And in either event, there is that major change 

from your bill and your bill in Birmingham? 

A That is correct. But in Birmingham they have nine 

councilmen from districts. 

THE COURT: ; 

They are designated. They have residences, but 

have to be elected, at large? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

What was that? I am not clear on that. 

A In Montgomery they must run from designated district 

and they must live in those districts. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

In Birmingham they have residential requirements, 

all elected at large?   A That's right. 

Q Two blacks in Birmingham currently serving, are 

they not? 

      ~60 |   
p
a
d
 

  

  

  

  

attend 

way unl 

of a fe 

Martin 

few prc 

Q 

of frag 

distric 

groups | 

       



740 
  

have J Yes. A 

Q Do you know the racial composition? 

A It is five -- four to five whites and four blacks. 

Q Has Montgomery found that this kind of districting 

plan has produced a five four racial block on various issues 

¥ brought before the council? 

A I discussed this with Mayor Robinson, who is a close 

; friend of mine. He has the opportunity or privilege to   
{ attend the council meetings, but he cannot interfere in any     nine way unless he called on. He has told me, with the exception 

of a few issues, one of which was to rename a street 

Martin Luther King Memorial Drive, that there has been very 

+ 4 few problems. 

1 Q You have recognized, senator, that there is a risk 

of fragmentation of a community through single member     
districting, do you not? 

stricts A I think that is debatable. You can make an 

argument for that. You can also make an argument for running 

at large. For me, it is very difficult to say. 

  ts Q Is it fair to say that recognizing that reasonable   
3 men may reasonably differ about whether the City Commission 

form is a better form than the form we would have ..... 

A I acknowledged that before Mobile United and other 

groups that that is debateable. 

——— [§ 261 
  
           



  

  
  

member of the County Commission and Ron Webster, a local 

business man, were they not? | 

A That is correct. 

Q Who were the leaders in the first election? 

A Gosh, it has been seven years, almost. 

Q Wasn't it Mr. Webster? 

A Mr. Webster, as I recall, Mr. Webster led the ticket 

and, in the runoff, I think I won by twelve hundred votes. 

Q Did you seek black votes? 

A Yes. 

Q Had you, on previous occasions, been to the non- 

partisan voters league and sought votes for others you 

supported? 

A Yes. 

Q Since your election, have you been available to 

blacks and whites who have sought to speak to you about 

matters of concern to them? 

A Yes. I have tried at all times to make myself 

available to anybody, black or white. 

Q Have you ,in fact, have any contacts with blacks 

tnalding black leaders? 

A Yes, many times. 

Q Could you name any particular black leader which who 

you have had numerous contacts?         262 

132 

  

  

about 

come t 

before 

gets t 

invest 

of wha 

is. 

Q 

substa 

A 

that t 

Police 

         



134 
  

| 752 

about how to handle things like this and I urged him to pleats 

ig come to me first and at least let us discuss the situation 

before it more or less went public. 

Q Did he agree to that? 

A Yes. I felt good about the meeting. I thought 

it was worth while and when I left I felt we had really had 

a meeting of the minds. However, after a period of quiet 

ticket 
it continued as it was before. 

pes. Q You mentioned Mr. LeFlore sending copies or addressing 

copies to many persons, including the FBI. Has the FBI 

investigated that type of complaint? 

a A Yes. Any time a letter or request of this type 

gets to the FBI, the Department of Justice. it has been 

investigated and the FBI always conducts a full investigation 

of whatever the incident that they are asked to investigate 
to 

is. 

Q Has the FBI ever Feperied to you that they found 

substance in any of these complaints? 

A There has never been a report to me by the FBI   
that they found evidence of police brutality in the Mobile 

cks 
Police Department.   
Q There has been a lot of talk in this case, 

Mr. Doyle, and I am sure you have heard the testimony about 
ich whom 

this Diamond -- the so called alleged lynching incident. 

<63 
                 



      

  

  e
S
 
A
 

GR 
et

 
ver

. 
sai 

inh 

  

p
r
_
/
m
 

Will you tell us when you learned about it and 

what happened? Give us a chronology of this. 

A All right. TI believe my dates are accurate, at 

least the time lapse, I know, is accurate. It was reported 

to me on Wednesday afternoon by Mr. Clint Brown, who was 

the attorney -- I don't know who he was representing at the 

time, but he called me as an attorney to report this to 

me. 

Q Is Mr. Brown a partner in Mr. Blacksher's law 

firm? 

THE COURT: 

I will take judicial knowledge of that. 

A He called me and related..... 

THE COURT: 

I don't know whether he is a partner or not. He is 

in the firm. 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

Let the record show he is a partner. 

THE COURT: | 

Okay. 

A He related an incident to me concerning a hanging 

or lynching or he described it in several different ways. It 

was certainly unusual and it shocked me to even hear it. 

As a matter of fact, it was hard, at that time, for 

        264   

755 
  

  
me to 

at tha 

was a 

we set 

in the 

Dr. Ga: 

N.A.A.¢ 

it and 

meetin; 

we had 

Q 

A 

of the 

Attorne 

I recal 

of poli 

Commiss 

was, an 

that we 

and I t¢ 

in its 

it and 

         



  

~4
 

755 
  

me to believe that something like -that could kavben. Well, 

at that time, I said this is, of Coutie, = we agreed it 

was a matter of urgency and needed {mmediate’ attention. So, 

Srted we set a meeting as early as possible the next day. This wad 

in the afternoon of Wednesday. 

So, we had a meeting on Thursday. In the meantime, 

Dr. Gailliard who is, as you know, connected with the   N.A.A.C.P. called and expressed his concern. He had heard 

it and told me, at that time, that he would not be at the 

meeting, but nevertheless wanted to express his concern. So, 

we had the meeting. 

Q Who was present at the meeting? 

A Well, there was a number of people present, me=zper: 

of the non-partisan voters league was present. The District 

fists Attorney's office, the FBI, they had been notified, but, as 
e       I recall, were not present at this meeting and the chief 

of police and myself. I might point out that I was the only 

Commissioner present at this meeting. The reason for that 

was, and I realized at the beginning that the information 

that we had received was sketchy, at best, and had no specifics. 

It was a police matter and was my responsibility 

A
R
 

T
E
 

S
T
 

ol
 

N
o
g
 

BIP
M 

0 S
HA 

AE
A,

 
Sr 
SR
 

p
S
 

T
A
Y
 

BA
 

2 
R
L
 

eg, 
eT
 

ta
te

 
2 
de

lg
s 

Ai)
 

AR
 

el 
Ls 

S
E
A
 

ty
 

¥ 

ing 

and I thought, therefore, that I should hear the complaint 

in its entirety and make a determination as to how to handle 

bn
 

d
h
 

oF c
e
t
 

it and then report it to the other Commissioners.     

ar
 

hd
 

i Rae 705               
   



  

  

  

  

  

    

  

  
  

  
    
  

  

        

\ 

plus = 
Q All right, What happened at the meeting? : 

natura 
A We went through the details of the incident in : 

get aC 
which they described to me that a young black male was 

. : met ag 
ii arrested and that a mock lynching or hanging took place in 
I of mar 
| the downtown area, generally in the vicinity of Wintzells 

Mondas 
: on Conti Street. > 
| ; from c 

They said that the man had been lynched and I made 3 
| ; 3 

i the remark then, "If he had been lynched, most certainly he | 
l L} we haw 
i! vould be dead.", and that they then -- we referred to that, 3 i 

3 was tl 
after that, as an alleged happening. : 

matior 
Needless to say, every one present was shocked, the 

| . in foc 
i chief of police and myself, the District Attorney's offiee, 

} the City Attorney, who was also present, and considered 
i and, w 
! this a matter of utmost urgency and we immediately instructed 
i : we met 
' our police people to start an investigation. This was on 5 

est C 
i. Thursday. | 

! Now, on Friday, about Friday afternoon, the City 
5 neithe 
| Attorney, Mr. Fred Collins, called and informed me that the 5 
! Mr. Gr 
| first information that he had gotten, the first statements 

that he had read that were taken from some of the officers : 
rate, 

|| who were named, indicated that, in fact, this had happened . 
or qu 

| and that we were to get into it further. 
| 

| When we have an internal investigation in the 

I immedi 

i police department, we take statements from every one involved, . 
4 BAP Geol. I EE 

| RBH | 

     



ice in 

ells 

I made 

nly he 

+ that, 

ed, the 

ffiee, 

ed 

  
  

  

  

758 
  

naturally -- it was going to be a little time consuming to 

  

BP
 
S
O
 
T
V
 

0 
AE 

O
T
 

a 

  

plus thelr supervisors and on down the line, and it was 

get all of this information together. So, we did and we 

met again on Monday -- as a matter of fact, we met by way 

of many phone conversations all during the weekend, but on 

Monday we met again and, with the exception of one statement 

from one party we had assembled all of the information. 

On Tuesday, which is our day to meet, the day that 

we have our conference meeting, City Commission meeting, it 

was then, that afternoon, and we got the last bit of infor- 

mation we sigeded to bring all of the story as we knew it 

in focus. 

At that time, I called the other two Commissicnor- 

and, with the chief of police and the City Attorney and other 

we met in my office and I detailed the incident, to the 

best of my knowledge, to them. 

They were very shocked and upset and, to my knowledge, 

neither one of them had heard of the incident. I believe 

Mr. Greenough had said he had heard some conversation or 

rumours, but he had probably discounted it, but, at any 

rate, this was the first knowledge they had. We met then 

for quite a long time to determine what should be done. 

At that point, we took what I considered to be 

immediate pesitive and stern action. 

  

        267    



  

  

  

This was an administrative action of the police 

department. One man admitted that he was the person involved, : 

Seven others were suspended for fifteen days and then the 3 

who was most responsible. He was immediately terminated. 

matter went into the hands of the grand jury who conducted & 

  

  

an investigation. 

The grand jury then indicted five men, including 

the one we had terminated and exonerated three. 

Q Exonerated three of the people that you had 

suspended? 

A Three of the people we had suspended were 

exonerated. I might add the suspensions -- we based the 

suspensions on the fact that these men had failed to report 

it and this is an administrative action. They were suspended 

for failing to report an incident of this type. 

The five men were indicted by the grand jury and   they are awaiting trial, at this time. The other three 

served out their suspensions and were put back on duty and 

that is -- let's see, I don't know exactly the status of 

those three other men, at this point, but they are back on   duty at the Mobile Police Department. Eb 

But what all of this led to was what we got into | | 

after this and that was a very, very intensive investigation 

had be 

thirty 

person 

City A 

two ade 

degrees 

or thos 

Q 

Or MOTE 

subsequ 

personr 

A 

out the 

  

into not only this incident but into a number of others that | 

        peggy 265° 

| 
- = 

| 

  

   



involved, 

ated. | 

n the 

ducted 

  
ading 

the 

report 

uspended 

  

  

~~
 

  

  

had been reported in the last, I would say, within the 

thirty days prior to this and our investigation was conducted 

personally by the chief of police in co-operation with the 

City Attorney and several other police officers. 

It, as you know, resulted in the termination of 

two additional officers, plus six suspensions of varying 

degrees handed down to other officers. Those did not connect 

or those were not related to the Diamond incident. 

Q Now, just to try to complete the picture, did one 

or more of the persons suspended, as a result of this 

subsequent investigation, take their cases to the County 

personnel board? 

A Yes, a number of them have appealled. 

Q Has there been any action as to any of those appeals 

A I believe one of them had a suspension reduced. 

Q Didn't the papers indicate, I thought two..... 

A Possibly two. I Haven't kept track as closely as 

perhaps I should. 

Q There has been some suggestion here, Mr. Doyle, 

that the only people in Mobile that had any concern about 

this Diamond occurrence were members of the black community; 

is that right? 

A Absolutely not. There was concern expressed through 

out the community from all sides. There was concern voiced 

LJ 

      
  

ims SOD  



by such organizations as the League of Women Voters, to 

mention some -- they are not necessarily white, but they are 

a mixed group, the Optimist's Clubs, Mobile United, a Aunber 

of organizations. 

Q The Chamber of Commerce? 

A The Chamber of Commerce.. They made a report or   
The N.A.A.C.P. ministerial groups, both | 

1 

| 
had a report on it. 

black and white, expressed concern. 

I had letters of concern expressed by individuals, 

some black and some white, and it was a general feeling of 

upsetment and concern throughout the community and it was 

not necessarily related only to blacks. 

Q Did you have any correspondence with Mr. Gary 

Cooper about this matter? 

A Yes. I corresponded, from time to time, with   Representative Cooper on a number of matters. He has easy -- 

we get along together and we talked about problems about 

his commmity and Mobile as a whole and he had ...... 

THE COURT: 

Is he a black legislator? 

A Yes, sir. He had expressed, in a letter expressing 

concern that he wrote me and outlined a few things that he | 

thought would be of benefit to the police department and to | 

the city as a whole. It was along the same lines of various 

          270 oy 

  

  

request. 

requests 

thing, w 

involvec 

other tw 

was a re 

to assur 

and that 

washed. 

it was g 

Mobile Pq 

to assur 

again. 

MR. ARENI 

morning I 

connectia 

exhibited 

A 

across it 

Q 

as a stati 

     



  

  

  
easy -- 

essing 

t he | 

  

  

  

B
o
i
e
s
 

L
E
   

    

E
E
 

M
l
 

  

  
762 

  

requests that I got from other groups. 

After having received many of these inquiries, 

requests, you know, statements of concern and that type of 

thing, with some help from the -- well, from everyboily 

involved, the chief of police, the City Attorney and the 

other two Commissioners, I developed a response to this which 

was a response designed to answer some questions and designed   
to assure the people that the matter was to be dealt with 

and that it was not going to be as some people put it, white 

washed. It was not going to be put under the table and that 

it was going to be dealt with and the City of Mobile and the   
Mobile Police Department was going to do everything they could 

to assure them that something like this would not occur | 

again. 
| 

MR. ARENDALL: 

If your Honor please, for the first time this 

morning I saw this statement that Mr. Doyle prepared in 

connection with this recent incident. It has not been 

exhibited to counsel for the other .side. | 

When was this prepared? ge 

A I had a lot of papers I was going through and I came 

across it. 

Q It has not been exchanged. I would like to offer it 

as a statement. 

              <1        



  

  

  

  
  

  
    

  

  

  
  

    
        

763 I 

the one 
I take it ycu prepared this to give out to people? 

: A 
A Yes, sir. This statement was prepared to give to 

in my o 
people who, for instance, the N.A.A.C.P. met, the ministarial 

: 1 there w 
| groups met, Gary Cooper, Representative Cooper, received i 

I belie 
a copy of this and I had a number of copies made and it was 4 

|  § black m 
| given to the media and it was just given out generally 3 

| : : § Church. 
around to the people who had an interest. § 

| ; : during 
| MR. ARENDALL: i 

public. 
| I will offer it as Exhibit 85. 

(Defendant's Exhibit 85 received and 
attend 

marked, in evidence.) : 

: Mount O. 
| MR. ARENDALL: 

read an: 
| Q Mr. Doyle, when you sent the information that you 

: : our pos: 
| supplied to Mr. Cooper, did he indicate any desire to further 

| : status : 
{ pursue the matter? 

3 hands, : 
[ A He indicated in the letter to me -- his letter J 

| : ] went anc 
| said, in essence, that it appeared that we had the mechanism : 

| | i 
underway or proposed to address ourselves tq this problem. 

} ] Monday 1 
i! He called then attention to the need for increased 

3 by the ! 
training for police personnel in the area of human relations, 4 

I : Q 
| but generally seemed satisfied with this statement that [4 

do you c 
was given to him. 

: police c 
Q When all of that was developing, did you and any 1 

connect 
other member of the Commission attend any meetings other than ‘ 

gy | 
I ;        



763   

ple? 

2 to 

starial 

ved 

Et was 

1anism 

fem. 

sased   
    

    

  

  

164 
  

the ones you have mentioned? 

A Yes, sir. I might add that I had numerous meetings 

in my office with various groups, even -- well, at any rate, 

there was a meeting called by the Mobile Ministerial Alliance 

I believe is the name of the group, which is made up of 

black ministers. They had a meeting at Mount Olive Baptist 

Church. I can't remember exactly the day, but it was right 

during the first week of the -- when the incident became 

public. 

They asked me to attend and asked Mr. Mims to 

attend -- asked all of us to attend. Mr. Mims and I went to 

Mount Olive Church one morning. I had a statement which I 

read and which explained to these people assembled what 

our position was, at the time. It was more like sort of a 

status report. We had just gotten this information in our 

hands, really, and it was sort of a status report and we | 

went and the media were there. It was covered pretty well. | 

Then subsequent -- no, this must have been on a 

Monday because subsequent to that there was a meeting held 

by the N.A.A.C.P. that night. | 

Q Mr. Doyle, as you reflect back on that occurrence, 

do you consider that the city and your department and the 

police department reacted vigorously and effectively in 

connection with trying to do something about it? 

    

  

          .. &73



  

  

  

  

  

  

        
  

  

  
  

  

765 

A I think we did. I feel that we did everything that 
personn 

we could possibly do. We did it with no prodding from any give us 

particular group. We did it because we were vitally concerned. these v 

We, ourdelves, were really concerned about the incident. We 

acted quickly, almost immediately, I would say, considering : 
k way in 

: ¥. 

the fact that I would say we had to gather information. 5 
| 1 the peo; 

We acted on Tuesday afternoon. We decided what to | : 7 respond 

do. It was made public that same afternoon and the man who 4 
I 3 1 resolvi 

| was terminated was terminated that day. The men who were | 
came to 

suspended, their suspensions began that day. We acted, I 
we woulc 

think, decisively. I feel that what we did was proper and Q - 

I believe that the men involved who now are awaiting trial 
hire son 

in the Court should be given due process as everyone else 
get cert 

and that anything further we have to say or do concerning b A 

those men would probably tend to jeopardize the litigation. : 
| - personne 

iQ Now, do I understand you to say that you have formed 1 like thi 

| an internal investigation unit and it is to ride herd on 3 
§ 

; and make 

| reports of such incidents? | 3 the back 

A Yes. Let me say that -- oh, since Captain ! 

Wimberly left the Mobile Police Department and went with 2 Former 

p 

the Sheriff's Department and since- Captain Walter Levine ] head of 

died, we have suffered from a shortage of men in that ih comin 

L] 1 § Captain's rank. It has been our intention to establish such: to hin a 

a unit as long as ten months ago when we requested that the | in charg 

: - . - FS Lh reed 

~ R74       
     



  

  

  

  

    

      

7654 766 

Ing that personnel board fill these existing vacancies, at least to 

Hany give us a certification from which to choose people for 

Sa these vacancies. 

ent. We At any rate, we recognized the need to have an orderly 

ldering | i way in which complaints of this nature were handled and that 

Ss | ; the people who made the complaints would be properly 

what to : responded to and they would provide to all due haste in 

Ben Whe resolving it. We determined shortly after -- well, all of this 

Were came to a head that rather than wait on the personnel board 

2d, I we would go ahead and form this unit. 

=r and Q- Let me interrupt you a minute. You can't just go 

trial hire somebody because you have a need for them, you have to 

else get certification from the Mobile County personnel board? 

rning A That is correct. In other words, if we want 

zation. personnel, we have to go to them and, obviously in a position 

ve formed | like this, as extensive as it is, you can't just pick etnies 

1 on | 1 and make them an investigative officer. They have to have 

| it the background and the knowledge. 

| : The opportunity presented itself when we discovered 

with : a former Mobile police officer retired and serving as the 

2vine head of Faulkner State law enforcement school was interested 

- | 3 in coming back to the Mobile Police Department. We talked 

ish such to him and he agreed that he would and he would be the man 

Rat the | | in charge of the investigative unit. That is Major Bill 

5; a5       
 



  

  

  

    

    
    

  

  

      

j—167 I 

5 them 
Lamy, who served some thirty odd years with the Mobile Police 9 

some 
Department. As a matter of fact, he had the job of ) 

Q 
investigating internal matters and also citizens' complaints 

: 3 A 
before he left the City of Mobile Police Department. ! 

which 
Major Lamy came and, as a matter of fact, he came i 

£ relat 
on board after having notified his people of his intentions, 1 

: | 3 type 
he came on board on the first of July. We have not yet 3 

: tell 
finished forming the unit. : | 1 

i kids - 
We believe, at this time, that we will probably have i 

3 about 
Major Lamy and two other police officers, sworn officers, y 

¥ regula: 
plus some secretarial help, and already he is presently 

. people 
involved in conducting investigations whenever they come up. : 

: at lee 
Q Do you, on occasion, Mr. Doyle, get complaints from 4 

Eg that c 
whites as well as from blacks about alleged abuse of power E 

: Q 
by individual policemen? E 

: 5 distir 
A Yes. We get complaints from all citizens. The 

; A 
police department, as you can imagine, we have a number of £ 

| 
1 Q 

| complaints. 
| i 8 activi 
1 Q There has been some testimony here about the cross | i 

are su 
| burnings. I believe someone has commented that you did not | J 

s E Allen 
make any statement about that. | 4 

de A 

What was your attitude about that matter? 4 

| 4 Q 
A Well, let me say that I deplore cross burnings. I | : 

| 3 connec- 
|| deplore murder, rape, robbery. I deplore all of these things 3 

! — ps | 
| 276 f  



  

  

  
  

    
  

  

    

  

      

| 77 
iim foie 87 

them establish it, give them rules to go by, and give them 

le Police 
some training and tell them what we thought would best help. 

Q What is the community relations division? 

nplaints 

A That is a division of the Mobile Police Department 

] which -- well, community relations, we call it public 
> came 

| y relations, it does things such as visit schools and that 
antions, | 

| ] type of thing, show movies and we show movies to ladies to 

yet j 
3 tell them how to protect themselves and we show movies to | 

| 4 { 

1 kids to tell them about the evils of drugs and residents 
ably have, 

about how to take care of their houses and we also have a 
~ers, Sy 

regular program of visiting high schools and interest young 
=ly 

people in becoming =-- not necessarily police officers, but 
~ome up. : . 

at least getting into the criminal justice system. We Io 
ts from ] 

that on a regular basis at all of the high schools. 
power : : : 

Q All of this done among blacks and whites and no 

distinction based on race? 
The 

A That's right. It makes no difference. 

Her of 
Q Mr. Doyle, the police department or certain of its 

activities insofar as employment and promotion practices 

=> Cross 
are subject to the supervision of this Federal Court in the 

Hid not | 
| Allen case, are they not? 

| A That's right. 

Q And you have an affirmative action planned in 
anys. 1 

| connection with that matter? 

se things we 
LEA moe Ga | 

3 

    
 



| 772 
  

  

  

  

  

A That is correct. 

Q And in your opinion, how is that working? 

A We were directed by the court to develop a plan by 

  | which we could recruit minority people into the police 

department. As you know, and I will have to relate this to 
t 
| 
ll 

| 

i 
the activities of the Mobile County Personnel Board, because   they are really the ones who are responsible with furnishing 

! us with personnel. 
| 

We were directed, along with the personnel board, 

to develop a plan by which we could attract minorities into 

the Mobile Police Department. We certainly needed that and 

we needed the minority groups in the police department. 

| So, we developed a plan that was subsequently 

presented to the court and it was examined and found to be   acceptable and we were told to continue or go forward with 
| 
| 

i 
|| this plan, to implement this plan. I really would like to 

i 

| 
| I 
t 

' 

| 
| t 
| 

say, though, that we have not recruited blacks like we would     
like to recruit them to the Mobile Police Department. We 

| haven't had as many applicants as we should and we certainly 

| i 
} 

would like to have more. 
| 

Q Do you have any plans to try to improve that? | 

One, in   
A During the incident, during the time of the incident) 

I was given some references of people to contact. 
|   I indirectly contacted to see if he would be | 

particular, 
|   

  

    | R278 | 
| 

1 - 

  

  
  

  

amenabl 

track r 

the pro 

not nec 

better 

Q 

A 

a letter 

departme 

A 

Mobile f 

was back 

call bla 

there we 

that of 

Melton, 

         



772 
  

an by 

is to   
ecause | 

ishing 

  
in 

incident] 

e, | 
| 

  

  

c
a
 

  

  
  

amenable to giving us some help and he has had a very good 

track record in recruiting blacks and it is my intention, at 

the proper time, to contact him to see if he can help us, 

not necessarily to change what we are doing, but to do it 

better or to add some inovated ideas. 

Q Is the fire department integrated? 

A Yes. 

Q How long has that been? 

A I really don't remember. It has been probably -- 

I think Mobile was the first fire department to have blacks 

on it in the State of Alabama. 

Q No Court suit ever brought on that? 

A No, never any court action. 

Q As a matter of fact, has the Mobile Beacon published] 

a letter of commendation in connection with the fire 

department? 

A Well, that was in regard -- we were integrated, the 

Mobile fire department had blacks, but they were -- and this 

was back some six or seven years ago, they were in what we 

call black companies. There was one company all black and 

there were no blacks in the white companies or vice versa. 

At some point in time it was my decision, along with 

that of the fire chief who, at the time, was Chief Douglas 

Melton, retired now, to as we put it, to break up the black 

[   
| 
| 
| 

i 
| 

| 
| 
| 

| 

  
| 

          <9 — 
|



  

  
    

    

departments, black companies, at least, and we did that and 

we put the black firemen out, all around in the different 

companies at different places, and the Mobile Beacon wrote 

a nice article in the paper about how much they appreciated 

it. 

Q The black community hadn't filed a law suit or 

saything of that nature? 

A No, no there wasn't a law suit. 

Q There had been some testimony here about the locatio 

of fire hydrants. I believe particularly about Mr. Randolph 

in the Plateau community. 

Just briefly can you tell us whether there is any 

discrimination by City Hall as to where fire hydrants are 

located, where there are more in black communities than white 

or anything of that sort? 

That is determined by the underwriters. A No, sir. 

What we do, the city of Mobile's water and sewer department,   installs the fire hydrants and the City of Mobile pays for 

it. We go according to -- if the insurance people say one 

is needed here we put one there. In a new subdivision they 

will lay out exactly where fire hydrants will go. 

Q Some indication by Mr. Randolph of lack of response 

at City Hall to any matter that he brought to their 

attention. 

      260°   

  

  

f 

| 

  

  

C
a
t
 
Si
e 

it
er
 

| 

light 

factor: 

A 

Q 

the Cou 

Captair 

would 1 

departm 

various 

number 

protect 

A 

the cit: 

it relat 

squad, c 

The ares 

that we 

-= the t 

twelve b 

we have 

  

       



114   

at and 

rent 

wrote 

ciated 

locatio 

andolph 

8 any 

are 

Aan white 

ers. 

x tment,   5 for 

% one 

1 they 

=sponse   

b
b
s
 

oc.
 

XE
 

e
e
 

a
e
]
   

E
A
T
 

I
 
Y
E
 

  

  

is located. 

Q In your opinion, is the question of where a traffic 

light should be and should not be determined by racial 

factors? 

A It is absolutely not. 

Q Briefly, outline to us, Commissioner Doyle =-- and if 

the Court please, I expect to go into this further with 

Captain Winstanly who is directly in charge of it, but I 

would like just a brief outline as to how the police 

department determines the number of policemen to be patrollin 

various areas and so on. 

There has been some complaint by, I believe, a 

number of these witnesses that they don't get enough police 

protection in that particular area. 

A sir. Yes, Well, the city is divided, at present, 

the city is divided into three major areas. This is as 

it relates to the police department. 

One area is covered by what is known as the ten 

squad, one by the twenty squad and one by the thirty squad. 

The areas are divided into beats. It was about ten years ago 

that we had twelve beats. The city was divided into twelve 

-- the three areas were divided into twelve beats -- not 

twelve beats each, twelve beats overall. Through the years 

we have changed that. 

Jind dd 

          <81. -—      



778 
  

    

We have changed from twelve to eighteen in order 

to give better concentration of coverage and then we went 

from eighteen to twenty-four and, at present, there are 

twenty-eight areas. 

When you say how do we determine and area, it is 

determined by -- naturally geography has something to do with 

it or maybe an interstate highway or something of that type 

might determine one boundary but we tried to divide it where 

the maximum per capita coverage will be available to all of 

the citizens. 

Every beat, as we call it, all of the twenty-eight 

beats, has a car, blue and white, assigned to it. 

We now have weekly crime stats which are given to 

us as to burglaries and robberies telling us what beats are 

most heavily hit, whether it is the afternoon, whether it is 

the morning, whether it is nighttime and based on these 

statistics we shift people, always leaving one blue and white 

in each area, but we shift personnel to more or less beef up 

an area if there has been a particular outbreak of s5y house 

burglaries or automobile burglaries or what have you. 

Q I take it then that you try to determine, as best 

you can, what particular areas need additional protection at 

any given time? 

A That's right, and that is based on crime statistics. 

    282     
  

A
R
T
I
 

FOTW 
et
 

Fe
d 

RE
O 
R
p
 

gi 

  

  

  

Q 

of the 

the va 

by rac 

A 

Q 

as Cit 

you ha 

A 

Q 

A 

MR. AR 

BY MR. 

Q 

represe 

commun i 

A 

Q 

A 

Q 

the bla 

         



778 
  

do with 

type 

where 

11 of 

eight 

lt 

1 white   
=ef up 

house 

  

| 

  

a 
ee

 
f
a
   

a
,
 

ci
el
 

Sa
 

ER 
NE
 
e
l
l
 

Bh
 

  

f
o
r
 

A 
H
I
R
E
 

A 
A
I
 

Ne
 

Br
 

H
E
R
 

R
O
N
 

Cm emmy amt. ATL ast AL 

  

Q I will ask you whether, in your opinion, the efforts 

of the police department to provide police protection for 

the various areas of the city are determined in any respect 

by racial considerations? 

A No. 

Q Mr. Doyle, do youconsider that since your election 

as City Commissioner and your re-election as such, that 

you have fairly represented all citizens of this area? 

A I do. 

Q Has that been your purpose and intent? 

A Yes. 

MR. ARENDALL: 

No further questions. 

CROSS EXAMINATION 
  

BY MR. BLACKSHER: 

Q Mr. Doyle, you feel like you have always fairly 

represented the particular rised interest of the black 

commmity? 

A 1 do. 

Q What are some of those particular rised interests? 

A Beg your pardon? 

Q What are some of the particular rised interests of 

the black community that you have fairly represented? 

  
  

779 

  

          _. R83      



  

  

  
  

    

      
        

| | 
I will let you make your record. Go ahead. BI gure 

MR. BLACKSHER: ; | MR. BLA 

| Mr. LeFlore made these recommendations about a j 

citizen's review board as a way to deal with police brutality | | 

. complaints? 
i 

i A I think so. ; MR. BLA 

i, You disagreed with that? | 

5 A Yes. I think I disagreed with the review board | you to 

~ because it is demoralizing to any police force. ; that is 

Q Was there any other groups besides Mr. LeFlore and A 

| the NAACP who also asked for a review board? Il in rega: 

A I presume they did. They haven't recently asked ; | mgs, 

i for one. They haven't asked for a review board as related law enfo 
i 3 : 

| 0 the Diamond incident. 3 289 enfe 

| Q What other groups have asked for a review board? | funds ws 

i A Well, they don't necessarily call them review boards; to have 

| They call them by a number of names, citizen's committees, Q 

| concerned citizen's groups or what have you. But they all Mr. Doy- 

probably have the connotation of being a review board. . : by the : 

! There was a request by -- let's see, I think chief of 

i representative Cooper requested to have a committee, although 

| he said not a review board, but a committee. One of the | A 

| ministerial groups wanted a committee which, in my {udzanent. only cor 

| could have become a police review board. | | Sen 

H Ah re : 

| © 28a" a 
: 
]        



  

  

      
    

            
    

{v0 fii - gdp 
Be | 
] am sure the press wouldn't misquote me. 

| MR. BLACKSHER: 

i | We offer this in evidence. 

Salty 2 (Plaintiff's Exhibit 102 received and 

| marked, in evidence.) 

| | MR. BLACKSHER: 

| We have marked in pencil that statement and I want 

-d : : you to see if it refreshes your memory and whether you think 

: } that is accurate. | 

y. 2nd H A I am sure that is accurate. He was, at that time, | 

Il in regard to the City's attempt to get some law enforcement | 

ed i funds, some funds from the Federal government to promote good} 

ted law enforcement, and Mr. LeFlore was apparently calling on the 

| law enforcement assistance administration to withhold the 

47 f funds until we did whatever it was he was seeking for us 

bisards : to have done and that is when I said I was sick and tired. 

8s, 1Q Let's talk a minute about the Diamond incident, | 

all | | Mr. Doyle. You said that the meeting attended by Mr. Diamond 

| i | by the non-partisan voters league, the D.A. was there, the 

| chief of police and you were the only commissioner. 

a Are you sure that Mr. Mims was not also there? 

& A I don't believe he was there. I believe I was the 

SHEnt. only commissioner there. It was 2 rion full of people, you 

| ii understand, and there were a number of members of the non- | 

i esd BON ~ *65 = T 
| i       
 



  

  

  
  

  
            

    
    

  
        

| 

Sie rehomed LY Cs x 793 

; 
] firse partisan voters league there, I know, and a number of attorneys 

| the r there, too. | 

! || for mn Q You recall me being there, for instance? | 
| I end A I don't recall your being there or not. 

" and t Q Mr. Brown was there? : I 

: i Q A Yes. 
: 

asked Q Reverand Hope from the non-partisan voters league? 

: witho A Yes. I believe so. H 

! ; ! duty, Q Do you recall what Mr. Brown and that delegation | 

| i A asked you to do on that Thursday that the meeting was held i 

| THE ce the day after Mr. Brown had telephoned you on the phone and | | 
| 

reported this incident? : : | 

A | i | made ¢ A Well, specifically, I don't know that I recall any : 

! : man's demand that they made or any requests that they made. The J 

: A meeting, as I recall, was -- of course, it was an emotionally t 

: | ; had do charged meeting, as you can imagine, and we, as a city | : 

| § THE CO commission and me and the police and other people, the : } | 

| : | District Attorney and others involved with the police | i | 
: | i 4A department, were very upset about it. It was obviously, i | 

was wh to us, the thing to do was , number one, to determine what 4 | 

| : Il shocki: happened and that is what we endeavored to do. : 

i | MR. BL. Now, it would not be proper for me, as police i | 
4 

commissioner, to take any precipitous action based on what f 
: ! at that I had heard at that meeting. You understand this was the i 

286      



    793 | | ve  . STN IR O  L   

  
| first time that I had heard it except the conversation on f attorneys 

| the phone with Mr. Brown. So, it wouldn't have been proper | 
| || for me to take any precipitous action, at that time, until 

      
| I endeavored to find out what the facts in the case were, | l 
and that is what we did. 

i 

| |   
  

  
  

    
      x ~ 

i Q In fact, the precipitous action that that group 

asked you to take was to suspend officer Patrick with or eague? 
| 

: y without pay. In any event, to get him out of the line of 

g I duty, because they thought he was dangerous; is that right? | tion : 

| A That's right. | held l : | | | THE COURT: | ne and | | 

| | Officer who? Is he the one that claimed to have | 

1 | made some later statement about he put the rope around :-he L1 any 

3 man's neck? 
The : 

; A Patrick was the officer who had admitted that he -ionally; I 

i had done what was alleged to have been done. 

| THE COURT: | 
; | | fo All right. 
Te | : A Here again, we didn't know anything for a fact. This y, 8 

| i was what people were saying, their telling us. It was what § | 

: Il shocking to us to hear it. 
Fi {| 

; | MR. BLACKSHER: 

; : | You didn't have Officer Patrick under investigation, | what 3 | 

| at that time? | the - 
| x ¢     
 



  

  

      
  

    
        

  
      

    
  

      

i a Il cies 
i 

A Not in regard to this instant, no. A 

Q Didn't you have him under investigation for some | | 

: other incident? jpaets tl 

JA 'I don't know. I am not familiar with that. Officer J 2boue o 

{ Patrick, they say, you suspend Officer Patrick immediately. A 

| Well, as a matter of fact, we did take Officer Patrick out je 

! of the area in which he was in, out of the division he was His this 

; in, to get him away from what might have been a situation to jouitat X 

| jeopardize him or someone else, but it certainly wouldn't : a 

| have been proper for me to say, "Well, I believe what Q 

everybody is telling me. Therefore, I am going to suspend ve or A 

i Officer Patrick immediately." That wouldn't have been fair Sob his 
! 3 | 

| to him or anyone. The results were that he was, in fact, te 

|| terminated. Iwas the 

THE COURT: | ahead o3 

| When? 
Q 

| A On the following Tuesday afternoon. 4 

| MR. BLACKSHER: : Q 

Would the clerk show the witness Plaintiff's Exhibit : that sh 

| 657 A 

I am showing you, in a group of newspaper clippings, | | is unde: 

| Mr. Doyle, marked as Plaintiff's Exhibit 65, the front page | | Q 

of the Mobile Register, Sunday morning, March 28, 1976. Resring 

| The headline is 'CB Theft Suspect Shot By Patrolman'? | I 284 ao 

   



  

  

      
      

        
      

ented 795 I cs i rg SEAR TS ct - a T95 
| 

a Right. 

in i ig Would you look that article over, especially the 

| |parts that are underlined, and see if it refreshes your memory 

\Eticer | about Officer Patrick? 

ely. JA Yes. He is the one that shot the CB thief.. 

out lo This is the man who had two bullet wounds in each of | 

Was | nts thighs, a single wound in his right ankle and superficial 

oh a : relia: wounds in each of his wrists? 

rg A That is what is reported here in this paper. | 

Q And that was approximately -- well, just a matter of | 
: 

| 

dnd | eo or three days before this alleged lynching incident | 

I | 
fair ‘occurred, right? | 

ce ‘a Let's see, this was Sunday morning. I guess that 

vas the Saturday night. It apparently was about a week 

| ahead or a week before. 

| Q A week before? 

| A Something like that. It was pretty close, right. 

: Q And officer Patrick was not under investigation for 

«hibit : | chat shooting? 

| A Any time a police officer discharges his weapon he 

pings, ; is under an automatic investigation. 

page | Q Isn't it a fact that the delegation that attended the 

; meeting on Thursday pointed out this incident as being related 

| I and another reason for suspending Officer Patrick immediately, 

dd ~ 289 
|   
 



  

  

  

      

      
  

  

| td 
| a Fa ipa 1. i 1 797 I 

| | THE coi 
! even if suspending him with pay was necessary? i 

A I don't recall that, but I am sure they brought } 

: | Well, 1 
, that up. : ; 

: J was the 
:Q You said that on Friday, the day after the meeting ‘ 

h : ‘ mentior 
| that we were talking about...... 

f ! MR. BL! 
THE COURT: : 

; | 

Let me get some times straight. With reference f 

a CA 
to when attorney Brown called you on Thursday, when is the i i 

g ! on Thur 
+ alleged mock lynching to have said to have occurred? : 

I : i | THE COL 
| A As I recall it was to have occurred ten days prior 

I : i 
1 to that, I believe. I am not positive of that time. i ; 

l : | MR. BLA 
iy THE COURT: ] 
| : | 

Isn't there something that we can agree on? Aren't | 

: : THE COU 
there enough facts that we can establish that time by : i 

| 

agreement? | 

| : hy the all 
MR. BLACKSHER: : } 

| ! | in the 
| Yes, sir. : I 

| J | MR. BLA 
MR. ARENDALL: | ! 

3 } 
I If you have a copy of the indictment, wouldn't it i } 
I : : | that th 
| state what date it was? | 
| go i THE COU 
| MR. BLACKSHER: : ; 
I i ! 
| The grand jury report, which is the front part of H 

i : | MR. ARE 
| the Exhibit 65, says that the event erupted on the night ; of 

I | I 
Il of Mareh 28, 1976, which would be the same Saturday night. F il 

item ; : HE l 
I : R80 | l 

{ i ! 

|    



  

      
  

  
  

  
  

  

; I 798 
797 Ss. 

| THE COURT: 

| L With reference to the shooting incident. All right. 
1t . 

| Well, now, let's get dates we are talking about here. What 

i | ' was the date of the Thursday that attorney Brown called or 
sting: i 

mentioned it? 

| MR. BLACKSHER: 

! | I believe it was Wednesday, your Honor: 
e i i I - 

3 ts . 

; | i TA That's right. Wednesday afternoon, because we met 
the | i i E 

: ! on Thursday. : 
| § I 

: | THE COURT: : 
rior b ! : 

t J All right. What was that day? 
i 
i 
| MR. BLACKSHER: 

! The 31st of March, is that a real date? 
ren't | 

. THE COURT: ; 
| 

| | All right. That would have been three days after 

: '| the alleged incident. What is the date of the story there 
% { 

! lin the newspaper? 

| MR. BLACKSHER: 

: } March 28th, is the date of the paper, which means 
it y 

: | that the event occurred on March 27th. 
A i 

| THE COURT: 

! All right. Go ahead. 
of. ; | 

| MR. ARENDALL: 
x 

| 
she | \ i Judge, I must say I don't think you are wrong, but 

toad : | | h— Cent ou Gg et fb AE] TRI 
i | f 

} 

i 1   
 



  

    

  
  

      

  

    
  

      

| 

A ng vig 
I am looking at something here that is headed news release 

. dated April 15, '76 and it says here that Mayor Doyle Patricie 

received a formal detailed complaint from Mr. Diamond's Lhe cou 

attorney on Friday morning April 9th. I don't know whether i 

| that is another ....... "he was 

SA That probably is right, except that it wasn't get at 

Friday morning. Well, we might have received something in A 

‘detail from him, then, but the meeting we had was on details 

. Thursday. : THE COU 

MR. BLACKSHER: i 
I 

| It says this, if I may read and just for the some of 

purpose of trying to get this straight. Las ARE: 

"Police department and City attorney immediately 

started an investigation at 5:00 P.M, That same day the Some ‘new 

District Attorney's office and the FBI were informed and THE Coul 

requested to conduct an investigation. On the following 

Tuesday, April 13, 1976, nine matters were called to the : and repc 

lattention of the board of commissioners of the City of Mobile'l, : | BLAC 

and at that time, we thought we had sufficient facts and j | 

iso forth and the talk goes on. This is part of our Exhibit the reve 

75. Whether it 1s accurate, I don't say, but it is dated ordered 

April 15th and it would hardly appear to me that there would A matters 

{be a news release on A pril 15th that we would be very off | A 

fon these dates. | : Q    



SACD 4 + 1 

her 

  

bile", 

it 

ald   

a1}
 

  

E
W
R
 

    

J
 

e
p
 

800 
  

It would appear to me that the Tuesday on which 

Patrick was fired must have been April 13th and then....... 

THE COURT:     
lh 

| 

"he was terminated, don't we? Can we establish that date 

Well, certainly we would have some record of when   
| 
get at it backwards from that date? 

| A The complaint was made by phone Wednesday and the | 

details of it was Thursday and ...... 

THE COURT: 

All right. Let's go back at it from that date. Do 

some of your records indicate when he was terminated? 

MR. ARENDALL: 

I am looking, Judge, to see. There ought to be 

some newspaper articles somewhere around here that would show, 

THE COURT: 

Why don't you examine the City records at Noon time |   and report back to us. Let's go on to something else. 

MR. BLACKSHER: | 

Mr. Doyle, you testified, didn't you, that following | 

the revelation of the Diamond incident, you initiated or 

ordered a very intensive investigation of this and other 

matters that were before you, at that time, other complaints? 

  A Right. | 

Q Now, when you say a very intensive investigation, how 

    . R93 |     
 



aan 294:   

| much more intensive was it than investigations you have 
| 

i previously conducted in response to these complaints? 
| 
A Well, for one thing, it involved the administration 

| of polygraph examinations which the others hadn't. It also i 

| involved more interrogation of people in the community and | 
if I guess you would say when we asked an officer for a state- i : 
| ment and he writes a statement, that is one thing, but when 

| we actually question him at length then we went into it a [3] 1%] 

i little deeper trying to get at the root of all of the problem 

I to the number of complaints that we had. 

I 
| trying to get at the root of all of the problems as regards 
| 

| 
Q You mentioned earlier that you had three major 

areas for patrols, the tenth squad, twenty squad, thirty 

| 

| 
| squad 

i ' whenever we found or whenever the statistics indicated that 

we had a particular problem in a particular area we more or 

less beefed that area up. The six hundred squad was formed 

in order to address itself to the increasing problem of 

burglaries, primarily auto burglaries, which involved primari] 

CB radios. 

-- what 1s the six hundred squad that Mr. Patrick was i 
in? 

| A The six hundred squad, you know, I mentioned to that 

801 

  
  

m
—
—
 
e
r
 

e
t
 
e
—
 

—
 

- 

  

  
    

        
Ly   The squad was formed and they were not put on 

I can't get too technical about how they were deployed, but 

they were not assigned during a regular tour of duty. 
      

2 
' 

  

  

  

  

  

  

If we de 

. burglari 

morning 

that is 

formed p: 

in Mobil 

don't knc 

within si 

Q 

A 

data that 

area neec 

where the 

where it 

showed tt 

Q 

concernin 

  

7 
P
e
 
a
 

e
i
 
E
R
E
 

S
E
 
S
r
 

pr
 

  
   



ration 

also 

and 

  
  

a
 

    

      
  

  

801 

  

  

2
0
.
 

r
e
 

FE
T 

ae 
ca
 

  

  

, morning until approximately four o'clock in the afternoon, then 

802 
  

We would take from statistics a framework of time. 

If we determined that the critical hours, as far as automobile 

burglaries were concerned, were from ten o'clock in the 

that is the time that the squad would be on duty. It was   formed particularly to address itself to the burglary problem 

in Mobile. It was in addition to the others. 

IQ When was it formed, Mr. Doyle? 

A I don't know exactly. It has been back some time 

ago | 

Q Nineteen sixty-nine? 

A No, no. More recently than that. Like I said, I 

don't know exactly when it was formed, but I would say probably 
{ 
1 

within six months, maybe, something like that, prior to this. 

Q What geographical area of the city did it work in? | 

A It moved around, depending on these statistical | 

data that we got every week. If the statistics show that the 

area needed attention and was, say, the Loop area, that is 

where they would be. If it-shifted to Toulminville that is 

where it would be, or downtown, or whatever. 

The deployment was dictated as to what statistics 

showed the need was. 

  Q Did the six hundred squad have any special orders 

concerning what kind of tactics or measures they could take? 

  

i
h
 

re
al

 
EA
 
A
A
 

Sa
 

A
N
 
ST
R 
t
i
a
 

+ 
Um 
h
y
 

  = 
B
P
E
 

    ... *95



  

  

A No. The six hundred squad was given the mission 

| of reducing burglaries. 

iQ They weren't given any particular license, for 

nage. with the use of weapons? 

LA Absolutely not. 

3 Do you know whether, after you investigation, 
{2 

whether, in fact, some of the police supervisors had given   > this license to these officers? 

A Our investigation revealed many times about instruc- 

| tions that had been given these men. I don't know that it 
| 

i 

| would be proper for me to go into detail about that since [N HE 
' 

' all of these men have appealled this to’ the personnel board 

) 

|| their terminations, and at the risk of jeopardizing either 

| pro or con, I don't think it would be proper for me to 

| 
| | comment on that.   'Q Well, your testimony is that you feel like you have 

| acted immediately and decisively in this matter? 

TA Absolutely as quickly as we possibly could. 

"Q You did say the City Attorney, Mr. Collins, confirmed, 

based on his interview of police officers, this alleged 

lynching had, in fact, taken place some four or five days   
before you acted to suspend Mr. Patrick? [ i 

| 
A Mr. Collins came to me and we were all involved in | 
    236 

803} 

  

  

  

  

hed b- 

| said to   
that ti 

be stat 

informa 

it had, 

that we 

we had 

| their s 

Q 

black c 

can't y 

it firs 

A 

0 o
 

[e]
 

= rt
 

rt
 

Q 

cross b 

communi 

A 

were in 

  leh 
|      



  

    

      

  

    
  

  
  

Le SL nay i : on 28 . 804 

| ssion | this, by this time, as you can imagine. Mr. Collins came and 

| sald to me on Friday that the information that he had, at 

for | that time, which now the information I am talking about would! 

I be statements taken from various officers, but he said the 

| information that he had gotten so far indicated to him that 

1, | re had, in fact, occurred and then our reaction to that was 

given | | that well we have to get all of the information, which meant 

| | we had to take statements from every officer involved and 

instruc- | thetr supervisors, too. 

at it Q Wasn't it true that the various delegations from the 

ince black community -- that the point they were making was why 

board can't you suspend people without even penalties attached to 

pealled J it first and then conduct the investigation later? 

ther A I think that we acted properly in the way we handled. 

ic. | 

| Q You also said, although you deplored cross burnings, | 

yu have | you did not feel any obligation to make a public statement | 

| | about them any more than you feel about burglaries or rape? | 

| A That is correct. 

ontirmed, Q Were you aware or weren't you aware that thess | 

d | cross burnings were creating particular anxiety in, a large | 

ays | community here in Mobile? 

| | A I might add that the majority of the cross burnings | 

»d in | | were in Mississippi or Baldwin County, but aertiinly an 

Pa | _ R97 > She     



  

  

    

  
        

  
            

  

    

| | 
TR TE RE Ge Bog 

| | 
| outbreak of violence of any kind creates concern. | Q 

| This kidnapping of the 26 children and burying them | | Exhibit 

under ground creates concern. I was equally concerned about | ] 

' the cross burnings as I was about everything else. | 4 

q For the record, now, the twenty-six children kidnapped : Q 

bate in California, right? y i a xerox 

ba Well, sure. of the E 

q Would the clerk show the witness Plaintiff's Exhibit | is, "Cre 

| 622 | Black Ce 

Now, this is a newspaper article from the Mobile | third ce 

Press Register dated Friday morning, June 25, 1976. It says | and Sta“ 

| that, and I am reading from the third paragraph, Mr. Doyle, Were Bu: 

| "State Troopers reported at least twenty-five crosses set | 

afire in the two southern most Alabama counties" meaning ! of the « 

Baldwin and Mobile, correct? i were bu: 

A I presume that is Sotbede. Southern most, yes. | ; weren't 

| Q "Meanwhile at least seven crosses were reported | creatin: 

| in Escambia County, Florida in front of black churches’, and A 

| then the top of the next column, "Mobile Police said one | matters 

| cross was burned off of Avenue A on Cottage Hill Road in tind Q 

| of a black man's house"; were you aware of that? | the par 

| A I was given a report on where they were burned. I | | im offi 

| don't recall whether it was in front of a black man's house | politic 

| or not. 3 

| 298. TENT AE ee & or i      



  

  

      

  
      

  

  

| | 
Ly OTE Ne CTRIERT. RL AS Sie DT KL 

| 
| Q Mr. O'Connor, would you show the witness Plaintiff's 

1g them | | Exhibit 1017? 

I about | | Do you ever read the Mobile Beacon, Mr. Doyle? 

| I A Not very often. 

kidRarped Q Well, what we have here is Plaintiff's Exhibit 101, 

| a xerox copy of the front, and it looks like the second page 

| | of the Mobile Beacon, dated July 3, 1976. The headline | 

Exhibit | is, '"Cross Burnings Threatening Letters Raise Concern in 

| | Black Community", and on page two of this article, in the 

ile | third column, it says, "Mobile Police Report Three Burnings 

E says and State Troopers Estimated As Many As Twenty=Five Crosses | 

>yle, Were Burned in Mobile and Baldwin Counties". | 

set So, even if all -- well, the balance or twenty--woc | 

ag | of the crosses were burned in Baldwin County, at least three | 

| | were burned in Mobile and perhaps more, but you said you | 

| : weren't aware or were you aware that these cross burnings were 

d | creating some anxieties in the black community? | 

, and | A I am aware that they created anxiety as other | 

e | : matters create anxiety. | 

n trom Q Well, isn't it a fact, Mr. Doyle, that because of 

| the particular constituency that elected you and keeps you 

3 | i! im office that that would have been difficult for you to 

>use politically come out strongly about statements about cross 

| 

“N
E # | .. R99 | 

  
 



    

I 

I 
| 
| 

. My constituency, they abhor cross burnings as much as I do. 

|     
i 
i 

+ incident with a Klu Klux Klan, correct? 

are black? 

| 
BEI SO {| 7 J 

  

    

| burnings in Mobile? 
| 

A I don't think it would make a bit of difference. 

  I don't think that if I said I abhorred it publicly on the 

front page, it wouldn't make any difference. They abhor ir, # 
% 9 ond didn't think it ‘was important enough to do | 
that? 

| 

A That is correct, 

Q You did meet, however, in the wake of the Diamond 

  
A They requested a meeting in my office, which was 

held. 

Q And that was reported in the paper? | 
A I didn't report it. It was reported because the 

media were there. 

Q Concerning the Mobile fire department, Mr. Doyle, 

what percentage of the employees of the Mobile fire department   
A The fire department has twenty-seven black people 

and four hundred and nine white.   1Q Have you done any recruiting for black firemen like | 

sou have for black police officers? 
: 

|A We don't have a specific program as we do for the H 

| 

| 
Haas 

i 
| 
| 
  

  

  0s : only 

  

  

  
  

  number 
departm 

Q 

Mr. Doy 

A 

Q 

that yo 

communi 

differe: 

A 

what yo 

Q 

you in 

ordinanc 

A 

equal of 

Q 

discrimi 

Mobile? 

A 

need of 

     



TEMPERA RUE | 

10 

mond 

Was 

=he 

~le, 

=artment 

ple 

  

  

  

  

3 

py 

W
I
 

np 

| 
i 

| 

812 
  

  

i department itself. 

  

number two and it will establish a rating for the fire 

  Q Do you know when the last final report was written, 

Mr. Doyle? 

A I am not sure. I think it was 1964. I am not sure.: 

Q I was going to ask you again, is it your testimony 

that you don't see that the black citizens or the black 

community in Mobile have any particular rised interests 

different from those of other groups? 

A If you would, Mr. Blacksher, tell me just exactly 

what you mean by particular rised interests. 

Q Well, let me ask you the question this way, are 

you in favor of the City of Mobile enacting a fair employment 

ordinance? 

A We are always ROE mean, through the personnel board, 

equal opportunity employors. | 

Q I am talking about a city ordinance prohibiting 

discrimination by private or public employors in the city of 

Mobile? 

A If we were actually doing it already, what is the 

need of an ordinance? 

Q So you see no need for such an ordinance? 

A Not as long as we attend to treating an employee 

fairly. i 

        30%



    

    

Q Are you in favor of the City of Mobile enacting a   city ordinance making it unlawful for persons to buy residences 

on the basis of race? 
3 

i 

kA As long as the end is being accomplished, whether i j 
not you have an ordinance would seem to be superfluous. If | 

! we are, in fact, allowing people to do these things. I don't! I | : 
| | see any point in having..... 

| 
5 

i Q You say we are allowing? 

J A I did not say that. I say as long as people are 

allowed wherever they want to buy? .   
| Q Are you aware of whether or not people are being | 

| I have heard absolutely no complaints. 
A 

| 
| Q Do you know whether or not there have been complaints 

f 
| 

1led in Federal Court under the federal laws? | 

I don't know. A 

MR. BLACKSHER: 

The Court can take Judicial knowledge of its own 
; records, but I know of and have handled at least eight cases. 

i 
! Federal Fair Employment law contains a provision through   | 

' I think the Court can also take Judicial notice that the | 

| 
| 

Federal Court must defer, if there are same. 

  

    
the bus 

A 

right-c 

li“it is ; 

decide 

“on the: 

rules « 

deny hi 

please:     
  law, st 

the cor 

by law 

  

    

T3085 l 34 
t
t
 

  
 



  

  

    
  

      

    

      
  
    

814 

A Let me say this, I am certainly in favor of people 

residences | | being hired in an equal opportunity way and being allowed 

to live where they please. 

ether or MR. BLACKSHER: 

a If | Are you in favor of enacting an ordinance pronibising 

I don't ! the burning of crosses in the City limits of Mobile? 
| Hi 

| A I think it is probably illegal to do that on public 

| | right-of-way all ready. Now, as to whether or not -- to say 

are | | it is illegal to burn a cross on private property, if someone 

decided this, that they wanted to burn a cross or anything | 

ing on their front yard and it didn't violate the environmental 

rules or anything, then I don't know that we should properly | 

deny him the constitutional rights to burn whatever he 

plaints pleases in his front yard. | 

| Q What about this cross that was burned on Cottage | 

Hill Road in front of ...... | 

| THE COURT: | 

wn | ! I think what he is asking you is with reference to 

cases. | an ordinance of someone burning a cross on someone's property 

] who is not there, is that what you are getting at? | 

1 | : A Yes. I am certainly in favor of prohibiting, by 

rn - | law, such as a cross burning that would be apt to upset 

he | the commun i ty in any way. I think if we could prohibit it | 

| : by law properly without violating someone's constitution | 

ii | —003 5 £9    



  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  

    
      
  

        

| 

: | So . i : 2 is meg i BLS 

rights, I think it should be done, yes. 

MR. BLACKSHER: THE COU 

When you were campaigning in 1969 -- I realize i 

you were ihopposed in '73. Therefore, I presume you didn't A 

do much campaigning in '69 when you were campaigning for this THE COU 

office. 

In your campaign, did you advocate fair employment | MR. BLA 

} opportunitites? 

A I think probably I made the same general remarks that people 

I was in favor of evervone being able to work and earn equal little . 

| with others. ; the Cit: 

Q Mr. Doyle, do you disagree with all of the white A 

li and black politicians who have testified in this trial so the pos. 

| far that a black candidate running at large in the City of believe 

| Mobile..... 

THE COURT: enough 1 

Are you going to be with him much longer? the peo] 

| MR. BLACKSHER: office. 

i No, sir. women h: 

| ug COURT : Q 

| The reason I say, it is twelve and we might as well persona 

| ret him come back after lunch. If we can finish up in five which ti 

| minates or so, go ahead. Mr. Arendall, do you have rebuttal? A would be 

| MR. ARENDALL: | ‘ | A



ze 

didn't   
for this 

  

Dyment | 

arks that 

1 equal 

ite 

80 

y of 

    

  

  

  

; Just for a couple of questions. 

THE COURT: 

Are you planning on being here this afternoon? 

A I would just as soon go and come back to finish up. 

THE COURT: 

All right. 

MR. BLACKSHER:   
I was going to ask you if you agreed with the other | 

people that have testified that a black candidate would have | 

little or no chance winning an election running at large in 

the City of Mobile? 

A Well, I have always said the politics is the art of   
the possible and if you are given certain ingredients, 1 

believe anyone can win an election. 

If you have a willing candidate and if you have 

enough money and if you have a program that you can sell to 

the people in a proper way I believe anyone can be elected to 

office. I will add, however, that I think both blacks and 

women have less chance. 

Q All other things being equal, Mr. Doyle, would you 

personally be in favor of single member districts out of 

which the Commissioners or councilmen of the City of Mobile     would be elected? 

A I believe that the present form of government has 

      JUO 

(0 
+]

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top