League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC), Council #4434 v. Mattox Memorandum Opinion and Order
Public Court Documents
November 8, 1969

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Motion for Extension of Time to Take Depositions, 1992. b97b3a86-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/6aa20cab-f541-4579-900f-abd59c1dbfa3/motion-for-extension-of-time-to-take-depositions. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
CV 89-0360977S SUPERIOR COURT LX ] MILO SHEFF, et al., Plaintiffs, : JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF : HARTFORD/NEW BRITAIN Vv. : AT HARTFORD WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, et al., : Defendants. : SEPTEMBER 28, 1992 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS Pursuant to the final pretrial order entered in this matter, the defendants are required to take the depositions of the plaintiffs' "outside" expert witnesses on or before October 15, 1992. The defendants have undertaken this task but have been advised by the plaintiffs’ attorneys that three of the plaintiffs' "outside" expert witnesses cannot appear on dates which are available before October 15, 1992. The plaintiffs have offered alternative dates after October 15, 1992 for these three witnesses. The defendants have agreed to schedule these witnesses on the dates suggested by the plaintiffs' attorneys. Under the above noted circumstances, the defendants cannot take the depositions of all of the plaintiffs' outside expert NO ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED NO TESTIMONY REQUIRED witnesses on or before October 15, 1992 as they are required to do by the pretrial order. To accommodate the schedules of the plaintiffs' "outside" experts, the defendants need an extension of time until October 20, 1992 to complete those depositions. The defendants reserve the right to request a postponement of the date for trial for reasons which will probably become more apparent after the conclusion of the depositions which have been delayed at the plaintiffs' request. The plaintiffs have been contacted in regard to this motion and have no objection to the extension of time to complete depositions, but note that they would object to any request for postponement of the trial date. WHEREFORE, for the foregoing reasons, the defendants request an extension of time to take the depositions of the plaintiffs’ "outside" expert witnesses giving the defendants until October 20, 1992, FOR THE DEFENDANTS RICHARD BLUMENTHAL ATTO Y GENERAL Zia § : \ NL’ Jo R. Whelan - Juris 085112 ASsAstant Attorney General A110 Sherman Street ‘Hartford, Connecticut 06105 fZ31: Bass A 7 7 By: < Juri Assistant Attorpey General ¥10 Sherman Street Hartford, Connecticut 06105 Tel, 566-7173 ORDER For a good cause shown, the foregoing motion is hereby | GRANTED/DENIED. By the Court Honorable Harry Hammer CERTIFICATION This is to certify that on this 28th day of September, 1992 a copy of the foregoing was mailed to the following counsel of record: John Brittain, Esq. Wilfred Rodriguez, Esq. University of Connecticut Hispanic Advocacy Project School of Law Neighborhood Legal Services 65 Elizabeth Street 1229 Albany Avenue Hartford, CT 06105 Hartford, CT..06112 Philip Tegeler, Esq. Wesley W. Horton, Esq. Martha Stone, Esq. Moller, Horton & Connecticut Civil Fineberg, P.C. Liberties Union 90 Gillett Street 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06105 Hartford, CT 06105 Ruben Franco, Esq. Julius L. Chambers, Esq. Jenny Rivera, Esq. Marianne Lado, Esq. Puerto Rican Legal Defense Ronald Ellis, Esq. and Education Fund NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 99 Hudson Street Education Fund, Inc. l4th Floor 99 Hudson Street New York, NY 10013 New York, NY 10013 John A. Powell, Esq. Helen Hershkoff, Esq. | Adam S. Cohen, Esq. || American Civil Liberties Union 132 West 43rd Street New York, NY 10036 / 74 7 pe 4% / / / / ; / A V4 A y 4 / ;-. if | | Zo 7 vi / 2 4 John R. Whelan ‘Assistant Attorney General