Discovery Schedule Order
Public Court Documents
July 9, 1998

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction, 1998. 4b6b106d-ee0e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/30bd2dfe-ebc1-47cb-9460-25d1a41c6950/defendants-motion-to-strike-plaintiffs-motion-for-a-preliminary-injunction. Accessed May 14, 2025.
Copied!
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION FILED FE3 1 0 1558 DAVID Ww. DANIEL CLERK Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3) MARTIN CROMARTIE., THOMAS ) CHANDLER MUSE. and GLENNES ) U.S. DISTRICT COURT DODGE WEEKS. ) E DIST. NO. CAR. ) Plaintiffs. ) ) DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE Vv. ) PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A ) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION JAMES B. HUNT. JR., in his official ) capacity as Governor of the State of North ) Carolina, et al.. ) ) Defendants. ) Defendants respectfully move the Court to strike plainuffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction for failure to comply with this Courts Local Rules. In support of this motion. the defendants show the Court: 1. The first complaint in this motion was filed on July 3, 1996. From then until October 17, 1997, all proceedings were stayed pursuant to orders entered by the Court with the consent of the parties. 2. On October 17, 1997, plaintiffs filed their first amended complaint. In that amended complaint, plaintiffs challenge the States congressional districting plan enacted by the General Assembly on March 31, 1997. 3 On January 30, 1998, three and one half months after they filed their amended complaint and two days before the close of the filing period for the 1998 congressional elections, plaintiffs filed a short motion asking the Court to issue a preliminary injunction “prohibiting congressional elections from taking place under the congressional redistricting plan enacted by the General Assembly in March 1997.” 4. In direct violation of Local Rule 4.04. plaintiffs’ motion to enjoin the upcoming elections to Congress was not accompanied by any brief. affidavit or other supporting document. 5 Defendants cannot reasonably respond to a motion for a preliminary injunction motion which is not accompanied by a brief or affidavits explaining the basis upon which plaintiffs seek such extraordinary relief. Wherefore. defendants respectfully request the Court to strike plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. a This the } 0%, of February, 1998. MICHAEL F. EASLEY ATTORNEY GENERAL Edwin M. Speas, Jr. Senior Deputy Attorney General ML he Yet £ K iare B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney ay N. C. State Bar No. 7119 Nees 2 Lonill Norma S. Harrell Special Deputy Attorney General N.C. State Bar No. 6634 N.C. Department of Justice P.O. Box 629 Raleigh, N.C. 27602 (919) 716-6900 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Preliminary Injunction in the above captioned case upon all parties bv depositing these documents in the United States mail. first class mail. postage prepaid addressed as follows: Robinson O. Everett Suite 300 First Union Natl. Bank Bldg. 301 W. Main Street P.O. Box 386 Durham. NC 27702 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS Adam Stein Anita S. Hodgkiss Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A. 312 West Franklin Street Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 ATTORNEYS FOR APPLICANTS FOR INTERVENTION iare B. Smiley Special Deputy Attorney General This the /® day of February, 1998.