United States v. Roemer Brief of Respondents in Opposition

Public Court Documents
January 8, 1991

United States v. Roemer Brief of Respondents in Opposition preview

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Milliken Hardbacks. Letter to Court and Counsel of Record from Solicitor General Derengoski Re: Supplemental Order, 1972. b4579d87-53e9-ef11-a730-7c1e5247dfc0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/825f7c99-378b-4b1d-83ec-8f96a1ce542f/letter-to-court-and-counsel-of-record-from-solicitor-general-derengoski-re-supplemental-order. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    L e o n  S. C o h a n  
Deputy Attorney General

&
STATE Ut  MICHIGAN

DEPARTMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL♦

F R A N K  J. KELLEY
A T T O R N E Y  G E N E R A L

LANSING 
4 8 9 1 3 .

Ju ly  26, 1972

AIR MAIL

Mr. James A. H ig g in s ,  C lerk  
U n ited  S ta te s  C ourt o f  A ppeals  
601 U.S. P o s t  O f f i c e  & Court House 
C in c in n a t i ,  Ohio 45202

Dear Mr. H ig g in s :

. Re: Case #72-8002
B radley  v M i l l ik e n

The supplem enta l o r d e r  o f  the Court d a ted  Ju ly  24, 1972, 
r e q u e s t in g  the p a r t i e s  t o  b r i e f  fo u r  a d d i t i o n a l  q u e s t io n s  
i s  acknow ledged . • —

T h e -s t a t e  d e fe n d a n ts '  p e t i t i o n  f o r  p e rm iss io n  t o  appeal 
g ra n ted  by the Court on J u ly  20, 1972, l i s t e d  some 13 
q u e s t io n s  f o r  b r i e f i n g .  T his  o f f i c e  con tem p la ted  r e q u e s t ­
in g  p e r m is s io n  to  f i l e  a b r i e f  in  e x c e s s  o f  50 p r in te d  
pages o r  70 pages by any d u p l i c a t i n g  p r o c e s s  as r e q u ir e d  
by Fed. R. App. P. 2 8 (g )  bu t  we had d e c id e d  th a t  we would 
make e v e ry  e f f o r t  t o  s ta y  w ith in  the r u l e .  However the 
su pplem enta l o r d e r  r a i s e s  fo u r  a d d i t i o n a l  q u e s t io n s  and 
i t  now appears im p o s s ib le  f o r  us t o  comply w ith  the r u l e .  
In the  meantime s i x  ca le n d a r  days have e la p s e d  and we 
must f i l e  our b r i e f  by August 14, 1972.

In  l i g h t  o f  the supplem ental o r d e r  would you p le a s e  a d v ise  
us a f t e r  c o n s u l t a t i o n  w ith  the  C ourt whether we w i l l  be 
p e r m it te d  t o  f i l e  a b r i e f  in  e x c e s s  o f  50 p r in t e d  pages 
o r  70 pages by d u p l i c a t i n g  p r o c e s s  in  l i g h t  o f  the  numerous 
and com plex is s u e s  in  t h i s  c a s e .  Your prompt a t t e n t io n  t o  
ou r  r e q u e s t  w i l l  be g r e a t ly  a p p r e c ia t e d .

RAD:ss
c c  C oun sel o f  Record

S in c e r e ly  y o u r s ,  \

“ /•-- /  ^  • /  w /  •>
R obert  A. D erengosk i 
S o l i c i t o r  G eneral

fe»1-L

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top