High Court Upholds Negro's Defense in Misdemeanor

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 03f2fa8e-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 6. High Court Upholds Negro's Defense in Misdemeanor, 1969. 03f2fa8e-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/162df4ec-763e-4ffe-9130-05201d455919/high-court-upholds-negros-defense-in-misdemeanor. Accessed May 14, 2025.

Copied!

    President 
Hon. Francis E. Rivers 

PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel 
egal fefense lund Jack Greenberg 

Director, Public Relations 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. Nome Devernin 

10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 ¢ NIGHT NUMBER 212-749-8487 

FOR RELEASE 
SATURDAY 
June 21, 1969 

HIGH COURT UPHOLDS NEGRO'S 
DEFENSE IN MISDEMEANOR 

WASHINGTON, D.C.---The case of an Arkansas Negro who was convicted on 

a morals offense led the U.S. Supreme Court to affirm this week that 

persons charged with a misdemeanor must be provided legal counsel at 

state expense. 

Arkansas, Iowa, Nebraska, North and South Dakota, and Missouri 

are affected by the court's action. 

The High Court's response was the result of the NAACP Legal 

Defense and Educational Fund's (LDF) defense of Robert Winters of 

Little Rock. 

Winters, found guilty of a morals offense involving a white 

woman, was first sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined $254 court 

cost. But, being poor, he had no money to pay the fine. 

Thus, as is the practice in Arkansas and some other states, he 

was sentenced to 284 days on the county penal farm towork off the 

fine at the rate of $1.00 a day. 

He was strapped with this sentence without benefit of a lawyer. 

LDF learned later that no one had informed him of his constitutional 

right to legal counsel. 

After his imprisonment, Winters filed for a writ of habeas 

corpus in the Little Rock municipal and circuit courts asking relief 

against his unconstitutional restraint, conviction, sentence and fine. 

Nonetheless, both courts denied his request. 

The United States District Court in Arkansas ordered Winters' 

release and the U.S. Court of Appeals in St. Louis rejected the 

state's appeal. On Monday, the Supreme Court of the United States 

refused to review the case. 

LDF attorney Michael Meltsner, arguing Winters' case in the 

appeals court, said Winters' sentence to a penal farm "constituted 

imprisonment for no other reason than poverty." 

Mr. Meltsner contended that because neither the judge nor 

anybody else informed Winters of his right to legal counsel, the 

local court deprived him of his rights guaranteed under the 

Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. 

-30- 

25

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

High Court Upholds Negro's Defense in Misdemeanor

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in