Shaw v Hunt Appendix to Jurisdictional Statement

Public Court Documents
August 1, 1994

Cite this item

Shaw v Hunt Appendix to Jurisdictional Statement preview

244 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Political Participation
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- fa60ede6-c39a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Correspondence from Still to Cox, Stein, and Jones Re: Amicus Brief, 1998. 1e920c96-db0e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/d8aea4db-7549-49f0-b879-3b2a068523a1/correspondence-from-still-to-cox-stein-and-jones-re-amicus-brief. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    OCT-07-98 WED 15:10 NAACP LDF DC OFC FAX NO. 2026821312 P. 02/04 

. Lawyers’ Committee for 

IN/\ Civil Rights Under Law 

| hd 1450 (3 Street, NW Tel: 202/662 8600 gf: Direct Dial: 

Suite 400 Fax: 202/783-0857 

Washington. DC 20005 Bullen Board: 202/782-0854 
202.682.8320 

Direct Fax: 

202-782-5130 

Email: EStill@LawyersComm
. org 

Co-Chairs 
Jack W. Londen 

Bade Lik 
  

Robert A. Murphy 
Treasurer 

i Te 6 October 1998 
Nicholas Christakos 

at Todd A. Cox, Esq. a 

NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 

1444 I Street, N.W., 10th Floor 

Washington, D.C. 20005 

    
    
  

  

Adam Stein, Esq. 

Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, Gresham & Sumter, P.A. 

312 West Franklin Street 

hapel Hill, North Carolina 27516 

Elaine R. Jones, Esa. 

Norman J. Chachkin, Esq. 

Jacqueline A. Berrien, Esa. 

NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 

99 Hudson Street, Suite 1600 

New York, New York 10013 

re: Hunt v. Cromartie, No. 98-85 (US Sup Ct), [LCCR VR 98-14] 

Dear friends: 

The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law 1s considering 

filing an amicus brief in this case. We would argue for a reversal of the 

decision below. 

Under Supreme Court Rule 37.3, I request that you send me your 

written consent to file the brief (which I will not use if your motion to 

intervene is denied). I note that you were kind enough to agree to our filing 

an amicus brief in Shaw v. Hunt, No. 04-923. T trust that you will not have 

an objection to our doing so this time. 
\o/Blay 

Nor ma . 

= 

— Jokes 

The Committee was formed in 1863 a1 the request of President John F. Kennedy 

OCT @7 '93 15:17 2826821312 PAGE. G2  



   

  

OCT-07-98 WED 15:10 NAACP LDF DC OFC FAX NO. 2026821312 P. 03/04 

Sincerely, 
ek 

Edward Still 

es/+ 

cc: 
Robinson O. Everett , Esq. 

P.O. Box 586 

Durham, NC 27702 

Martin B. McGee ; Esq. 

Williams, Boger, Grady, Davis & Tuttle 

P.O. Box 810 
Concord, NC 28026-0810 

Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Esq. 

Tiare Bowe Smiley, Esq. 

North Carolina Dept. of Justice 

PO Box 629 
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629 

OCT @7 ’S3 15:17 2826821312 PAGE. B3 

 



    0CF-07-98 WED 15:10 NAACP LDF DC OFC FAX NO. 2026821312 P. 04/04 

bec: 

David Stein, Esq. 

Steptoe & Johnson 

1330 Connecticut Ave NW 

Washington, DC 20036-1795 

OCT @7.798 15:17 2026821312 PAGE. B4

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Shaw v Hunt Appendix to Jurisdictional Statement

Impact area

Topic

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in