Welfare Recipients Encouraged to Work in Maine Court Ruling
Press Release
April 1, 1969
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Welfare Recipients Encouraged to Work in Maine Court Ruling, 1969. 27f0ad64-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/17f7c04e-0f75-4cd4-9683-2f84436c47ba/welfare-recipients-encouraged-to-work-in-maine-court-ruling. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
BAA) FE PRESS RELE/ Director Counsel
egal efense und a ee
eVore, Jr. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 © JUdson 6-8397
FOR RELEASE: April 1, 1969
WELFARE RECIPIENTS ENCOURAGED
TO WORK IN MAINE COURT RULING
Legal Defense Fund Attacks Bias Requirements
PORTLAND, MAINE---Six thousand welfare recipients will be encouraged
tc seek employment and 52 families will receive additional state aid
because of a decision handed down this week by a panel of three
federal judges here.
The three-judge panel, ruling that Maine's welfare laws did not
ecually protect the rights of all recipients, said parts of the laws
were "void and unenforceable."
Their decision was prompted by the NAACP Legal Defense and Edu-
cational Fund, Inc. (LDF) and the Pine Tree Legal Assistance Corpora-
tion who attacked the state's maximum budget and maximum grant
requirements.
The two organizations charged that these sections of the state's
Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) discriminated against
large families.
LDF Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg said the decision means that
52 families currently affected by the maximum grant provision will
receive increased AFDC assistance. He also said that more than 6,000
recipients affected by maximum budget requirements will be encouraged
to seek jobs.
Families will now be permitted to earn monies to make up the
difference between their actual need and the aid they receive.
LDF based its attack on the plight of three recipients of AFDC
assistance, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Westberry and Mrs. June Martin.
According to an official state schedule for determining monetary
need, Mr. Westberry, who is totally disabled, his wife and their ten
children required $643.86 per month to live adequately.
But because of the maximum budget requirement, their needs were
set by the state at $300 minus $156.62, the latter being the family's
only outside income. They therefore ended up with $345 less than
what they actually needed.
Mrs. June Martin is the Negro mother of nine children. Official
tabulation shows her income requirement to be $514.36 per month. But
the maximum grant stipulation allows her only $250, even though she
has no other income.
Now that the maximum budget and maximum grant requirements have
been ruled void, the state must create budget allowances based on
actual need for these families rather than the artificial requirements
LDF officials say that as a result of this decision, similar
maximum grant cases pending in 10 other states across the nation are
also likely to receive similar rulings.
-30-
E25