Welfare Recipients Encouraged to Work in Maine Court Ruling
Press Release
April 1, 1969

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Welfare Recipients Encouraged to Work in Maine Court Ruling, 1969. 27f0ad64-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/17f7c04e-0f75-4cd4-9683-2f84436c47ba/welfare-recipients-encouraged-to-work-in-maine-court-ruling. Accessed May 15, 2025.
Copied!
President Hon. Francis E. Rivers BAA) FE PRESS RELE/ Director Counsel egal efense und a ee eVore, Jr. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 © JUdson 6-8397 FOR RELEASE: April 1, 1969 WELFARE RECIPIENTS ENCOURAGED TO WORK IN MAINE COURT RULING Legal Defense Fund Attacks Bias Requirements PORTLAND, MAINE---Six thousand welfare recipients will be encouraged tc seek employment and 52 families will receive additional state aid because of a decision handed down this week by a panel of three federal judges here. The three-judge panel, ruling that Maine's welfare laws did not ecually protect the rights of all recipients, said parts of the laws were "void and unenforceable." Their decision was prompted by the NAACP Legal Defense and Edu- cational Fund, Inc. (LDF) and the Pine Tree Legal Assistance Corpora- tion who attacked the state's maximum budget and maximum grant requirements. The two organizations charged that these sections of the state's Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) discriminated against large families. LDF Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg said the decision means that 52 families currently affected by the maximum grant provision will receive increased AFDC assistance. He also said that more than 6,000 recipients affected by maximum budget requirements will be encouraged to seek jobs. Families will now be permitted to earn monies to make up the difference between their actual need and the aid they receive. LDF based its attack on the plight of three recipients of AFDC assistance, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Westberry and Mrs. June Martin. According to an official state schedule for determining monetary need, Mr. Westberry, who is totally disabled, his wife and their ten children required $643.86 per month to live adequately. But because of the maximum budget requirement, their needs were set by the state at $300 minus $156.62, the latter being the family's only outside income. They therefore ended up with $345 less than what they actually needed. Mrs. June Martin is the Negro mother of nine children. Official tabulation shows her income requirement to be $514.36 per month. But the maximum grant stipulation allows her only $250, even though she has no other income. Now that the maximum budget and maximum grant requirements have been ruled void, the state must create budget allowances based on actual need for these families rather than the artificial requirements LDF officials say that as a result of this decision, similar maximum grant cases pending in 10 other states across the nation are also likely to receive similar rulings. -30- E25