Primary Prevention Strategies Handbook: Conceptual Outline Comment (Draft)
Public Court Documents
October 1, 1991

38 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thompson v. Raiford Hardbacks. Order: Response to Motion to Intervene and to Join Additional Defendant, 1992. 257c3132-5e40-f011-b4cb-0022482c18b0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1380be0e-99e7-4384-ba12-d7e4d6189e29/order-response-to-motion-to-intervene-and-to-join-additional-defendant. Accessed June 17, 2025.
Copied!
[ U.S. DISTRICT COURT AN DISTRICT OF TEXAS o m IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRI( FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT O DALLAS DIVISION NANCY DOHERTY, CLERK By Deputy rl LOIS THOMPSON on behalf of and as next friend to TAYLOR KEONDRA DIXON, ZACHERY X. WILLIAMS, CALVIN A. THOMPSON and PRENTISS LAVELL MULLINS, Plaintiffs, Ve. Civ. A. No. CA3-92-1539-R BURTON F. RAIFORD, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Texas Department of Human Services, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. N s ? N a ? N t ? Na st ? N a ? C a t ? S a a t ? S w a t u a a i a t ? u s t ’ n i ? C a ? w a t S e ? i w t ’ S a ? “ w s ? “ i ? “ u s t ORDER On the 5 day of No , 1992, came on to be heard the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time by defendant United States of America. The Court, having considered said Motion and being otherwise fully apprised of the circumstances of this cause, is of the opinion that said Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time should be granted. It is therefore, ORDERED that defendant United States of America will file a response to Plaintiff-Intervenors' Motions to Intervene and to Join Additional Defendant on or before November 20, 1992. SIGNED this 5 day of Nov . 1002] Non ite UNITE Q Shope ata JUDGE \ ORDER -- Page 1