Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Leslie Winner Re Alternative Voting

Correspondence
November 30, 1987

Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Leslie Winner Re Alternative Voting preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Volume 6. Greenberg Statement on Mississippi School Board and HEW Integration Plans, 1969. 6e39d1d8-b992-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3319e2fd-d890-4a4b-a1e4-d66f2065b5d2/greenberg-statement-on-mississippi-school-board-and-hew-integration-plans. Accessed August 19, 2025.

    Copied!

    Statement by Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel, 
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 

November 6, 1969 

Our lawyers are meeting today with counsel for the Mississippi 

school boards, the U.S. Department of Justice and experts of the 

Department of Health, Education and Welfare in conference with 

Judges of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. 

Our proposed order to the Court states that (1) the Court should 

order immediate desegregation; (2) the plans previously prepared 

by the Department of Health, Education and Welfare for each of 

these districts should go into effect within 8 days or less; and 

(3) in the case of three school districts for which HEW plans 

proposed desegregation in 1970-71, we ask that HEW revise those 

plans within 5 days to provide for immediate implementation, 

and in no event implementation taking longer than 8 days from 

submission of the plans. 

The period 6f 8 days was selected because these plans originally 

were designed for implementation within 8 days following the issuance 

of a court order. The period of time is, therefore, not selected 

arbitrarily but is based on the intrinsic nature of the plans 

themselves. 

Most of the Mississippi school boards involved have already 

submitted their own proposed plans to the Court of Appeals as 

proposed substitutes for the HEW plans. The school boards' proposals 

have no uniformity and are all peculiarto the counties involved. 

But the point is that they have been submitted and generally contain 

mid-school year deadlines. 

The Department of Justice proposed order is slower by far than 

what the Mississippi school boards themselves have done. The 

Department of Justice has proposed no time limit on when the school 

boards should present plans; even though those boards have, for 

the most part, acted rapidly. The Department of Justice has proposed 

no time limitations on the issuance of an order or for the completion 

of desegregation, whereas the Mississippi school boards, generally, 

have done that. 

We continue to maintain the position which we advanced before 

Supreme Court of the United States and which it ordered on October 

The time for litigation has passed and the time for integration is

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top