Papers Show Justice Officer OK'd 'Racist' Voter Plan News Clipping
Press
October 19, 1983
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Papers Show Justice Officer OK'd 'Racist' Voter Plan News Clipping, 1983. 9e410954-c803-ef11-a1fd-6045bddbf119. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1da76ab2-f930-4198-8d17-7b1379e5e742/papers-show-justice-officer-okd-racist-voter-plan-news-clipping. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
o p——
golse, |D
(Ads Co.)
\daho Stateman
(D. 56,330)
(Sun. 71,219)
OCT 19 1983
4 : :
. Papers sh
‘+ By JOHN HANCHETTE
Gannett News Service
WASHINGTON — The Justice
Department's top civil rights of-
ficer went to extraordinary
lengths to satisfy state wishes on
i a New Orleans voter-redistricting
* plan recently described by a fed-
eral court as ‘‘smacking of rac-
ism."
Justice Department documents
obtained by Gannell News Serv-
ice illustrate in unusual detail how
controversial civil rights chief
william Bradford Reynolds tried
to satisly Louisiana officials over
the objections of his own staff:
Reynolds conferred with Loul-
. siana Gov. David Treen 11 times
before approving the plan. He
also backdated a crucial mémo
that allowed the plan to move
ahead and ordered his staff to
water down requests for justifica-
tion of the plan.
After two meetings and nine
phone calls to Treen, Reynolds
overruled his staff in the summer
of 1082 and personally “pre
cleared’ the plan. :
The new congressional district
created by the New Orleans plan
— known as ‘“Gerryduck™ be-
cause It looked on a map like the
head of Donald Duck — neatly
split the black vote and left white
Jefferson parish whole for Rep.
Bob Livingston, a personal friend
of Treen's.
Two weeks ago, a three-judge
federal panel slapped down the
plan as racist, saying It was
merely “an electoral scheme
which splinters a geographically
concentrated black populace
within a racially polarized parish,
thus minimizing the black cit
lzenry’s electoral participation.”
The case was the first time In
American history a court In
validated a
under the Voting Rights Act that
redistricting plan |
had recelved prior approval from
the Justice Department.
Reynolds’ spokesman, John
Wilson, gave GNS a statement on
behalf of Reynolds that sald, “The
various allegations of political
deals, overruling the staff, tele
phone calls and backdated
memos are absolutely untrue. In-
ternal staff recommendations are
just that — recommendations —
which have no validity until ap-
proved by those responsible for
the decision.”
Justice Department records
show that Reynolds signed a
three-page memo addressed
merely “To: The File” and dated
June 18, 1962 In which he ex-
plained the rationale for his decl-
sion.
Fallure to file the decision by
i time would have violated a
deadline that could set back the
plan 60 days and require Treen (0
resubmit the entire proposal for
Justice approval.
More importantly, the June 18th
date would place the Reynolds de-
cision safely before the date on
which Congress, without backing
trom the Justice Department,
strengthened the Voting Rights
Act — June 23, 1982.
Indeed, In the statement pro-
vided GNS by the Justice spokes-
man, Reynolds says “the plan
was precleared by the depart-
ment on June 18, 1982, prior to the
expanded congressional version.
Thus, the plan was appraised by
the court under a new and ditfer-
ent legal standard.”
But Justice Department papers
obtained by GNS show Reynolds
officially did not write the June
“plan,
ow Justice officer OK'd ‘racist’ voter plan
18th memo until a month later.
The memo explaining his contro-
versial decision was not even
placed in the Justice Department
file until July 19, 1982. ;
A “routing and transmittal” slip
signed on that day by Gerald W.
Jones, chiel of the voting rights
section, contains a scribbled note
of puzzement ‘on the bottom:
“please make sure this gets into
the Sectlon 5 file. It's dated 6-18-62
but I recelved It today."
When Lani Guinier, attorney
for the NAACP Lepal Defense
Fund Which sued to block The
received the material she
asked for, it contained the sur-
prising admission from Reynolds,
in a letter over the signature of
his voting rights chief Jones, that
the crucial memo was indeed
backdated.
Lr