Greenberg Statement on Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. Ohio Capital Rulings

Press Release
July 3, 1978

Cite this item

Greenberg Statement on Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. Ohio Capital Rulings preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- da52a975-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 6. Greenberg Statement on Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. Ohio Capital Rulings, 1978. da52a975-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1f2d4c0c-fb41-4fd9-89cc-1a9e64c2186c/greenberg-statement-on-lockett-v-ohio-and-bell-v-ohio-capital-rulings. Accessed June 13, 2025.

Copied!

    513 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC, egal efense land 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 « (212) 586-8397 

From: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Ten Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019 
(212) 586-8397 

Contact: Jack Greenberg 
James M. Nabrit, III 

To: City Desk and Legal Editors 

New York, New York, July 3 - The following is a statement by 
Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and 
Educational Fund, on today's Supreme Court ruling in the cases 
Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. Ohio. 

"Today's decision in Lockett v. Ohio ana Bell v. Ohio holds 
unconstitutional Ohio's death penalty statute. The Court also 
struck down the capital punishment statutes of Arizona and Pennsylvania. 
Ohio had the second largest death row population in the country, 99 men 
and women, 65 of whom were black. All together, this lifts the death 
penalty from more than 20% of Oye Golenedl death row population which 
now is almost 500, more than half of whom are black and other minorities. 
The Legal Defense Fund will continue in its effort to abolish the 
racially disparate and arbitrary punishment of death as eruel, unusual 
and unconstitutional." 

-more-— 

Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes 
The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it 
was founded by it and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 20 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget. 



The Legal Defense Fund capital punishment campaign began in 1967. 

Since then there has been only one execution, that of Gary Gilmore 

who wanted to die. LDF handled the leading Supreme Court cases of 

Furman v. Georgia which held capital punishment as unconstitutional, 

as arbitrary and freakish in 1972; Gregg v. Georgia and Woodson v. 

North Carolina which struck down mandatory capital punishment statutes 

and required that the death penalty be imposed according to standards 

in 1976; and Coker v. Georgia which struck down capital punishment 

for rape as cruel and unusual punishment in 1977. 

Note to Editors: The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., 
LDF) is not a part of the National Association for the Advancement 

of Colored People (N.A.A.C.P.) though it. was founded by that 
organization and shares its commitment to equal rights. For 20 
years, LDF has had its own Board of Directors, budget, staff, office 
and program.

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Greenberg Statement on Lockett v. Ohio and Bell v. Ohio Capital Rulings

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in