Company to Pay for Discrimination

Press Release
February 3, 1971

Company to Pay for Discrimination preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Volume 6. Company to Pay for Discrimination, 1971. 47369a64-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1f41d055-8d76-4e47-8081-247d91438ff1/company-to-pay-for-discrimination. Accessed October 12, 2025.

    Copied!

    February 3, 1971 
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 

COMPANY TO PAY FOR DISCRIMINATION 

New York, New York ---- In a decision handed down on Monday (2/1), a 

U.S. court of appeals for the fourth circuit ruled that companies found guilty 

of discriminatory hiring practices must pay legal fees incurred by plaintiffs. 

The decision came as a result of an otherwise typical Title VII case, 

where the court found the Cone Mills Corporation of Greensboro, N.C. guilty of 

discriminating against four black female plaintiffs, who were denied employment 

or even an opportunity to complete job application forms. 

Undisputed by the court was the company's claim that no jobs were available 

when the women applied. However, according to other testimony given, Cone Mills 

employed no black women at the time of the incident, and the court found that 

the company's broad policy of discrimination against blacks, in lieu of specific 

proof of discrimination against the four plaintiffs, was sufficient to establish 

a civil rights violation. 

Robert Belton, a lawyer for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 

Inc. (LDF), who argued the case and raised the question of legal fees, said 

"the decision will be a major breakthrough for Title VII litigation, especially 

if it is challenged and upheld in the Supreme Court." 

The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, the non-profit legal arm of 

the civil rights movement, whose case load is determined by the amount of 

S public support it receives, could conceivably increase its activity in the area 

of Title VII litigation because of the ruling on legal fees. 

Title VIL is part of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and forbids job discrimina- 

tion on grounds of race, color, religion, national origin or sex. 

The decision is expected to govern numerous Title VII cases currently 

pending in fourth circuit courts, and will be cited in courts around the 

country where hundreds of Title VII battles are being waged. 

-30- ; 

For further information: Attorney William Robinson 
Sandy O'Gorman, Public Info. } (212) 586-8397 

NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397: 

William T. Coleman, Jr. - President Jack Greenberg - Director-Counsel

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.