Defense Fund Triumphs in Memphis School Case
Press Release
June 16, 1964

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. Defense Fund Triumphs in Memphis School Case, 1964. 71ae2792-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/20c58b02-78af-4dd5-b3fa-138764bd427a/defense-fund-triumphs-in-memphis-school-case. Accessed May 13, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE ’"Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers June 16, 1964 Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg Associate Counsel Constance Baker Motley DEFENSE FUND TRIUMPHS IN MEMPHIS SCHOOL CASE MEMPHIS, TENN.-- The board of education was instructed to speed school desgregation, to redraw zoning lines and to consider a plan for integrating teaching staffs by a Sixth Circuit court here last week. The court acted on an appeal by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Struck down was the board's previous desegregation plan, under which integration would not have reached all grades until after 1970. The new ruling requires that all elementary schools be integrated this September, junior high schools in 1965, and senior high schools in 1966. Defense Fund attorneys had pointed out that as of this year, only 294 of the 50,953 Negro youngsters in Memphis attended school with the 54,684 white students, Desegregation began with 12 students in 1961, after a year and a half of litigation by the Legal Defense Fund. The court further ordered that new school zones be set up. Fund lawyers had argued that when the board had done away with dual zone lines (separate maps applied to the two races), it had formed new zones by irregular lines or by gerrymandering, thus maintaining a high degree of segregation. Two other arguments made by the Defense Fund were heeded by the court. In outlawing the board's minority transfer plan, the judges ruled that the plan was designed to perpetuate segregation by allowing pupils to switch from bi-racial schools. (mare) Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Defense Fund Triumphs -2- June 16, 1964 in Memphis School Case In addition, the court cited its own decision in a case brought by the Legal Defense Fund against the Chattanooga Board of Education, in which it ruled that "assignment of teachers by race may impair the students’ rights to an education free from any consideration of race." The judges asked the federal district judge to determine whether the Memphis Board should submit a plan for teacher desegregation. Arguing the case for the Legal Defense Fund was Assistant Counsel Derrick A. Bell. He was joined in the action by Fund Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg and Associate Counsel Constance Baker Motley of New York, and Fund cooperating attorneys R.B. Sugarmon Jr. and A.W. Willis Jr. of Memphis. Also participating in the suit were cooperating attorneys B.L. Hooks, H.J. Lockard, and B.F. Jones, all of Memphis. = 30s