Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Appeal

Public Court Documents
June 9, 2000

Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Appeal preview

3 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Appeal, 2000. ed7c5dfb-e00e-f011-9989-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2110e8c6-ce68-4e9f-9bbb-f71a0429ff5f/defendants-motion-to-dismiss-appeal. Accessed July 01, 2025.

    Copied!

    # # 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA 

EASTERN DIVISION 

Civil Action No. 4-96-CV-104-BO(3) 

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al., 

Plaintiffs, 

V. 

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official 

capacity as Governor of the State of North 

Carolina, et al., 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 

DISMISS APPEAL 

Defendants. 

N
a
’
 

N
e
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
o
 

N
a
 

N
a
 

N
a
 

N
e
 

NOW COME the state defendants, pursuant to Rule 18.5 of the Rules of the Supreme Court 

of the United States, requesting the Court to dismiss plaintiffs’ appeal of this Court’s March 8, 2000 

Judgment and its March 7, 2000 Order. 

Plaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal was filed on April 6, 2000. Under Rule 18.3 of the Supreme 

Court, an appeal is to be docketed within 60 days of filing the notice of appeal. The last day for 

docketing plaintiffs’ appeal was June 5, 2000. As of this date, that appeal has not been perfected. 

Pursuant to Rule 18.5, if a notice of appeal has been filed, but the case has not been docketed within 

the prescribed time, “the district court may dismiss the appeal on the appellee’s motion.” 

WHEREFORE, since plaintiffs have failed to perfect their appeal as prescribed by the Rules 

of the Supreme Court of the United States, defendants respectfully move this Court to dismiss their 

appeal. 

 



  

# * 
This the 9th day of June, 2000. 

  

MICHAEL F. EASLEY 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 

a 41d 
  

Tiare B. Smiley 

Special Deputy Attorney Genera 

N. C. State Bar No. 7119 

Norma S. Harrell 

Special Deputy Attorney General 

N. C. State Bar No. 6654 

N.C. Department of Justice 

P.O. Box 629 

Raleigh, N.C. 27602 

(919) 716-6900 

Raleigh, N.C. 27602 

(919) 716-6900 

 



  

# a 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

   
This is to certify that I have this day served a copy of the foregoing Defendants’ Motion to 

Dismiss Appeal in the above captioned case upon all parties by depositing these documents in the 

United States mail, first class mail, postage prepaid addressed as follows: 

Robinson O. Everett 

Suite 300 First Union Natl. Bank Bldg. 

301 W. Main Street 

P.O. Box 586 

Durham, NC 27702 

ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFFS 

Adam Stein 

Ferguson, Stein, Wallas, Adkins, 

Gresham & Sumter, P.A. 

Suite 2 

312 W. Franklin Street 

Chapel Hill, NC 27516 

Todd Cox 

NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc. 

1444 1 Street NW 

Washington, DC 20005 

ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT-INTERVENORS 

This the 9th day of June, 2000. * 

Dh 1 rt 
  

iare B. Smiley 

Special Deputy Attorney General

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top