Correspondence from Quigley to Jones, Guinier, and Karlan; Treen Judgeship May Spark Battle News Clipping
Correspondence
March 18, 1988
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Correspondence from Quigley to Jones, Guinier, and Karlan; Treen Judgeship May Spark Battle News Clipping, 1988. ce3e0fd0-c803-ef11-a1fd-6045bddc4804. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/26eb66a0-e3b1-4680-8aac-16d3523301e6/correspondence-from-quigley-to-jones-guinier-and-karlan-treen-judgeship-may-spark-battle-news-clipping. Accessed November 05, 2025.
Copied!
WILLIAM PATRICK QUIGLEY
ATTORNEY AT LAW
631 ST. CHARLES AVENUE
NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA 70130
IN ASSOCIATION WITH:
CATER & WILLIS TELEPHONE: (504) 524-0016
A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION
R. GLENN CATER
JENNIFER N. WILLIS
WAYNE P. TATE
(504) 524-2267
March 18, 1988
Elaine Jones
Legal Defense Fund
Suite 940
806 15th St. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20005
bani Quinjer
Legal Defense Fund
99 Hudson St.
16th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Pam Karlan
Legal Defense Fund
99 Hudson St.
16th Floor
New York, NY 10013
Re: Dave Treen
Dear Friends:
Enclosed please find the latest newspaper article about
Governor Treen.
It is noteworthy because this is the first time, that I know
of, that Governor Treen denies that he and his administration had
any hand in drawing up the donald duck congressional districts.
As I recall, I thought that the testimony of Chehardy and
others was that while Treen and his minions may not have been in
the meeting, those in the basement meeting constantly communica-
ted with Treen upstairs in the Governor's office.
If we have some testimony to that affect, I believe that we
can get another article out of this columnist who is very
interested in that issue.
March 18, 1988
Page 2
Please let me know what you think.
)
LAAN y ’ \s <
X
J | Az x
William P. Quigley
A-
3%
:
TH
E
T
I
M
E
S
-
P
I
C
A
Y
U
N
E
5
®
©
~—
8
<
=
>
§
JAITICS ii
Treen judgeship may spark battle
hen Dave Treen comes up for
confirmation to a federal
appeals court judgeship, the
Senate Judiciary Committee is
expected to stage its bloodiest session ‘since
the Robert Bork hearings. a
Treen’s detractors, led locally by ACLU
attorney Bill Quigley, say Treen should be
kept off the federal bench because he hag con-
sistently espoused racist policies since his
days as chairman of the States Rights Party
almost 30 years ago.
Treen naturally denies any animus against
blacks, but he has been involved in enough
controversy. over the years to make the’liber-
als on the Senate committee slaver. : 1
A 1960 flyer lists Treen, along with such lu-
minaries as Judge Leander Perez and Willie
Rainach, as a speaker at a “rally to save seg-
regation.”
His attitudes had not changed much by the
time he became governor of Louisiana, oppo-
nents of his nomination say, citing his deter-
mined efforts to block creation of a black-
majority congressional district in’ New
Orleans.
When the state Legislature came to redraw
congressional districts after the 1980 census,
both House and Senate voted for a black-ma-
jority district consisting of New Orleans and a
handful of Jefferson Parish precincts. Treen
promised a veto, whereupon legislators and
other public officials met in the Capitol base-
ment and came up with a plan more accepta-
ble to the governor. ;
This time the black vote was split between
two white-majority districts by means of
some remarkable cartography that produced a
district shaped just like the head and bill of a
duck. It was, indeed, generally known ‘as the
Donald Duck plan. 3
Treen’s foes have often alleged that mem-
bers of his staff participated in the basement
reapportionment session, to which black leg-
islators were not invited. But Treen denies
that his administration had any hand in
drawing up the Donald Duck map, although
he certainly pushed hard to get it approved by
the Justice Department and defended it
stoutly in the federal court that finally threw
it out.
Dave Treen
Another Bork?
When Donald Duck was submitted to the
Justice Department, the staff recommended it
be rejected. An attorney who analyzed the
plan wrote, “It is clear in our view that the
governor was acutely aware of the racial con-
sequences of his actions, and those racial con-
siderations formed the basis of his actions.”
But William Bradford Reynolds, head of
the Civil Rights Division, after several con-
versations with Treen, overruled staff objec-
tions and gave Donald Duck the nod.
Reynolds would later have occasion to rue
that decision, which was a principal factor in
the Senate Judiciary Committee’s refusal to
approve his elevation to associate attorney
general in 1985.
In court testimony Jerris Leonard, head of
the Civil Rights Division under Richard
Nixon, ranked Donald Duck as one of the
three most “egregious and blatant racial ger-
rymanders” in American history. It never had
a chance of passing muster in court.
Treen now says that his principal aim in
congressional reapportionment was to achieve
a numerical balance while saving his fellow
Republican Bob Livingston’s district from
“mutilation.” However, he remains opposed
to creating districts with black majorities,
which he says “are arguably not in the best |
interests of the black race.”
He argues that whites are more inclined to
vote for blacks than vice versa. Therefore, he
says, “a black is an odds-on favorite where |
the black population is 45 percent. If we took
all the blacks and put them in black-majority |
districts, that would be the best way to reduce |
their clout in the Legislature.”
Quigley and the rest of Treen’s opponents
claim he was an enemy of civil rights in vot-
ing, housing and education when he thrice
ran unsuccessfully against Hale Boggs for
Congress in the 1960s. As a congressman in |
the 1970s, according to the Louisiana Legis- |
lative Black Caucus, Treen “almost always |
voted against positions supported by the |
black community.”
Treen concedes that he voted against ex- |
tension of the Voting Rights Act in 1975 and |
was the only Southern governor to oppose its |
extension and amendment in 1982. He says |
he did so because he believes the act is no |
longer needed because Louisiana has elimi- |
nated discrimination in voter registration. |
Treen claims that his public career has |
been marked, not by a hostility toward blacks, |
but by a belief that “the federal govern |
has unconstitutionally overstepped its bounds |
in many areas.” He points out that, as a gov-
ernor elected mostly by whites, he appointed |
more blacks to senior positions in state gov- |
ernment than any of his predecessors. |
Whether he ever spoke at a segregationist |
rally years ago he claims he cannot recall.
However, the Times-Picayune covered the |
rally and reported that he spoke, although the
newspaper gave no details of whast he said.
“Dave Treen never had any racial motiva- |
tion in his life.” he says, “I’m not ashamed of |
anything I did.
“But in all candor people have changed. I
was born and raised in Louisiana. I would re- |
write history if I could. Joining the States |
Rights Party, for instance, was certainly a po- |
litical mistake.”
James Gill is a staff writer.
Ae hs A Ss A eC —————._ >