Greenberg Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Hutto v. Finney Arkansas Prison Case

Press Release
June 23, 1979

Cite this item

Greenberg Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Hutto v. Finney Arkansas Prison Case preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Collection
- Press Releases
Creator
- LDF
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 5b84a76f-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Press Releases, Volume 6. Greenberg Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Hutto v. Finney Arkansas Prison Case, 1979. 5b84a76f-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/27104f44-3a0c-4534-add2-374b420f53d4/greenberg-statement-on-supreme-court-ruling-in-hutto-v-finney-arkansas-prison-case. Accessed April 19, 2025.

Copied!

    310 

3\0 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC 

egal efense and — 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 « (212) 586-8397 

From: NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 

Ten Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019 

(212) 586-8397 

Contact: Jack Greenberg 
James M. Nabrit, III 

To: City Desk and Legal Editors 

New York, New York, June 23 - The following is a statement by 

Jack Greenberg, Director-Counsel of the NAACP Legal Defense and 

Educational Fund on today's Supreme Court ruling in the case 

Hutto v. Finney which affects the Arkansas prison system. 

"The Supreme Court's ruling will insure that prisoners are 

accorded humane living conditions and that they will be free from 

arbitrary, prolonged solitary confinement. This is a signal victory 

for humane treatment in correctional institutions." 

In an opinion delivered by Justice John P. Stevens the Supreme 

Court upheld the District Court's ruling that prisoners cannot be held 

in solitary confinement for an indefinite period of time. In addition, 

the state was ordered to pay attorneys' fees to the prisoners' counsel. 

This case was filed in 1969 in an effort to correct the barbarous 

conditions that existed in the Arkansas prison system. Over the years, 

those prisons were the subject of numerous articles exposing practices 

- more - 

Contributions are deductible for U.S. income tax purposes 

The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUCATIONAL FUND is not part of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People although it 

nak founded by it and shares its commitment to equal rights. LDF has had for over 20 years a separate Board, program, staff, office and budget. 

en eS 
ae 



Page 2. 

that were virtually medieval in nature. Men were confined to solitary 

for indefinite periods in unsanitary, overcrowded and inadequately 

guarded cells. Brutality by guards and other prisoners was commonplace. 

Prisoners' court-appointed counsel were unpaid, often resulting in 

inadequate representation. 

The local Arkansas lawyers were Jack Holt, Jr., Philip E. McMath 

and Philip Kaplan who argued the case before the Supreme Court. The 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) assisted them in 

preparing the appeal. The lawyers worked on the case without compensation 

since 1969 when it was filed, but were awarded $20,000 in attorneys' fees 

under the Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act of 1976 which provides 

that fees may be awarded when the civil rights of a plaintiff have 

been violated. 

NOTE TO EDITORS: The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. (LDF) 
is not a part of the National Association for the Advancement of 
Colored People (NAACP) though it was founded by that organization and 
shares its commitment to equal rights. For 20 years LDF has had its 
own Board of Directors, budget, staff, office and program. 

HHAHHHR EERE EERE

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Greenberg Statement on Supreme Court Ruling in Hutto v. Finney Arkansas Prison Case

Collection

Creator

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in