Excerpt from the Alabama Criminal Code
Working File
January 1, 1983 - January 1, 1983

Cite this item
-
Case Files, Bozeman & Wilder Working Files. Excerpt from the Alabama Criminal Code, 1983. 891f0e1f-f092-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/275044e4-0c33-4b5f-9962-a3e0fd549104/excerpt-from-the-alabama-criminal-code. Accessed April 18, 2025.
Copied!
S 13A.1-8 ALABAMA CRIMINAL CoDE s 13A.1.9s r3A'1'g' procedurar matters; civir liabirities not affected by tire.(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the procedure governing the,l}i:iffi , flT i.f lf ,? ffi::,d ; "' a' p " i.i, *, ii ""i11la. rs a n d o rre n s es (b) This titre does not bar, suspend or otherwise restrict any right or riab,itvto damages' penarty,. ro"teit-rrJ or Jir,., remedy "rirr""ir.a by law ,o b!recovered or enforced. in " .iu, r.t[r, regardless oi'*iuti,u, the conductiil: r"r',]'l lH j -... a i n g . o n. ii i " ".,",i'; r.il ; ;;il #,,,,,i ti r e. (Ac rs 1 e ? ?, S lgA-l.g Commentary ::f;liilfiilji::::i1l1ffi.1T::T:;,::1'" Acts or omissions to which a pecuniary offenses. s r-1-6. vv o' iluLroD Dy a person for his own use are not public At present, m.st of the Alabama Iaw on .riTirSr procedure is contained in Tit. 15. subsection (a) is intendea.to .a-tJft ;# "rnu, ,n"-r.o"i.i.*."iirre criminar code generailv are concernea onrv witr,'i,-,. *[.Llrir. i;ffi;l]#.Jj ;. not affect orher rules and principles or pteajing,-;"driclHlt ana appettate practice. Cross References: S 1-1-6, Certain acts r Tit. 1s, Criminat ,rrillli.ions not public offenses. S IsA-r-g. Lesser included offenses. , ..ti, "l?flt tl':ftx,..I3'"ff .',",1#Tl.ii "' orrense incruded in an orrense I (1) It is established l, o;;;f;rt.l"ru or{ewerthan a, the facts requiredto establish the commisrion or-tt"'iir.n.. charged; or thefactsrequired .# iilTtrTr;! iI ,:r:T3; :l:*;;=# ff ::ffi I,he orrens e charged .r9i:l'":pecificallv ;;;;;;;;#iv'Jirtrt. as a resser degree of the offense it!1r'ilffi:li:i:li:1f:::ffl::gonrv in the respect that a ress serious I e s s er k i n d o r c u r oa u iii ty,-G;;' ;,'!fi lfi ,Xiii." :tJ,T [:[X: in teres ts,- o rl (b) The court shair.'"i4G"il"]fi.with .especf io'in'in.ruded offense ,:1',:t j'""i,:i:.l,?:';TJi,4tr"',,;;,i"i#:;Tff i,'*",,1'0.,.il;;;;iil; " rhis _section is adapted jlT *;:,::ffi;:! 1,07,_Ne1v Jersey penar code s 2C:1-?(d), MichiEan Revised a.ili;;i.i;e s r;o(a) U irl..lr 1s an affirmativeauthorization ro convict -_ ,r," ."ta-.r..i.J#rin* _;flei.;I.,u.olo offenses within.il:'E?H,'#'t:r"m:r'J:;:il':nrffi*xr';ggti;ogBand,slz, : flr" {. t , t T s, {\, * 6ib- f,\l -l N) l'- i^t 5 s 13A-1-9 by title. governing the 'rs and offenses right or liabilitvtbylawtobl rer the conduct title. (Acts 197?, lhich a pecuniary r!i€ Er€ not public ttined in Tit. 15. r Criminal Code not affect other in an offense facts required ittnss sh2p*.6 '1'the offense a less serious interests, or a l,rded offense ndant of the ,,1'Penal Code ,rr affirmative ffenses within '-:l and l&17-1. s 13A-1-10 GENERAL PROVISIONS s 13A-1-10 (1) Subdivision (axl) provides that a lesser offense is necessarily included in a charge of the grealer offense if the proof necessary to establish the greater offense will of necessity establish "uu.f "i.tn"nt of the lessei offense. This is the majority view' Model Ferat Coae (Tent. Draft No. 5), pp' 40-41 (1956)' (2) subdivision (a)(2) provides that an attempt or solicitation to commit the offense charged or to commit ",ivl".i"aua offense is an included offense' Thus, on a charge of theft the evidence may ratt short of proving an unauthorized exercise of control over the ;'il;;1r:e., a.po.t lion, ot takini and carrying away under comm:n law) but it does prove defendant atte.npied to do sJ, or soliciied another to do so, and, thus, he may be found guilty ot att"mpied theft or criminal solicitation to commit theft' See Chapter 4' Inchoate crimes. Alabama follows the view that if the evidence shows the alleged offense was actually committed, ir,"r" i, no authority to convict of an attempt to commit such offense. Edwards ". St"t", iS Ala. App. 386;34 So.2d 1?3 (19a8); DeGraff v' State' 34 er". epplsz, 3? So.2d rg0 i1948); C".t run u. 34t., 42 Ala. App. 144, t55 So.2d 530 (1963)' But by statute in many slates, there can be a conviction of an attempt though the evidence shows that the completed crime has been committed. LaFave and Scott, criminal Law' 452 (t972). (B) Subdivision (aX3) covers a degree relationship in the statutes themselves' €'9'' second-degree theft o, u .f,urg" of flrst-degree thefi. This is important as the Criminal Code typically defines ;; ;;. crime andlhen divides it into degrees' Cf' Thomas v' State, 26? Ala. 44,100 So.2d 329 (1958). (4) subdivision (ax4) covers two situations. The first is where the offense proved differs from the offense-charged only in that it requires a lesser degree of culpability, e.g., manslaughter under s ise-o-s- (reckless killing) on a charge of murder under S 1gA-6-2 (intentionat tlffLgl-fh" second is the case where the offense proved ai!!9r1 from the offense .t urg"J ont in tf,rt less serious injury or risk is^necessary to establish its commissio n, €.g.,assault in the first or second degree, s 13A-6-20 or s 13A-6-21, under an indictment chargingmurder. cf. Keel v. state, 29 Ala' 191, 194 So' 416 (1940); weldon v. State, 50 Ala. Lpp.477,280 So'2d 183 (1973)' Subsection (b) states that the court shall not charge the jury on an included offense unless there is a rational basis for doing so, Accord: Weldon, supra. For example, on the state,s theory of ,nrrra", U".ause the tromiciae occurred during robbery (felony-murder)' the only important i..ul Inrv be the idelti-tv of the robber and the evidence is such as if,. iri, should "itf,"r "o*ici or acquit defendant, and it would be improper to instruct that manslaughter is " po..iur" u.rdi.t. Again, the evidence may show no robbery but ;fin p;;;; an inlawful hi*i.ia" of a lesser d"gr"", e.g., manslaughter by reckless killing, in which case an inrtru.ii* on the lesser offense would be proper. And see Powers v' state, 49 Ala. 690, 275 so.2d 369 (19?3) (prosecution possession of marijuana' a-felony, includes lesser offens" of por."..ion ior personal use, a misdemeanor, and failure to charge on lesser offense error)' Cross References: AttemPts, ChaPter 4. Criminal Solicitation, ChaPter 4' slsA.l.lo.Pendingproceedings,rightsandliabilitiesnotaffected. All proceedings pending and all rights and liabilities existing, acquired. or incurrcd on May l?, 19?8 are hcreby saved and mily be con.cummated according to the law in force when they were commenced. This title shall not be construed