Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Roy Rodney, Jr. Re Chisom v. Edwards; Affidavit of Silas Lee, III
Correspondence
June 9, 1988

Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Roy Rodney, Jr. Re Chisom v. Edwards; Affidavit of Silas Lee, III, 1988. 88e2006f-ec92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/29846020-bd5e-4030-811a-cac80240a6fa/correspondence-from-pamela-karlan-to-roy-rodney-jr-re-chisom-v-edwards-affidavit-of-silas-lee-iii. Accessed May 15, 2025.
Copied!
LesE,ED**H. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. 99 Hudson Street, NewYork, N.Y. 10013 o (2121219-1900 June 9, 1988 Roy RodD€y, Jr. 643 Magazine Street New Orleans, LA 70130 Re: Chisom v. Edwards Dear Roy: I am enclosing a new draft of the affidavit for Silas Leerrr that incorlrorates r,ani Guinierrs suggested changes. couldyou please aee that Mr. Lee signs it? r need for you to send back r€e's affidavit, a signed copyof Valteau's affid3vit (r mispraced mine), and the affidavit ylir and Bill are getting for Reynaud Rochon, by Federar Express sothat- r get it on Tuesdav. That wdy, r cin prepare the finalversLon of the papers and Fed Ex it to Birr t-o be f ired on Wednesday, as well as serve the defendants and the numerous hangers-on on Wednesday from up here. rf there are any probrems, prease carl De. r sharl be inthe New York office untir around 1:00 p.n. on lr[onday and then rhave a meeting in D.c. rf r haven't heard from yol, rrlr callyou li[onday afternoon. I look fonrrard to seeing you on S 29th. eIY, S. Karlan PK/ s enclosure C@bihtdiorrs on dadwt:ibb lor U.S iruome ta., pur7orr-& Th! il^ACP tilel thlcnsc t Edrrational Fund, lnc. (LDR ir not parl ol lhc il.0onsl &socladon tor lhc Mvlrcrmnt ol Colond Pcoplc ([{MCP) atilrouoh 1,.0f wesloundcdbyttr ilAACPand stuns lbcommitmcnttocqualrhhb. LOFhashrdlorowrXlycarca rparab Eoard,proeram,sbfi, ofiictand budqat. June IN THE T'NITED STATES COI'RT OF APPEAI,S FOR THE FIFTH CIRCT'IT ------:::-31:113:-------* : RONALD CHrSOIrt, et-al,-, : : Plaintlffs-Appe1lants, z v.: : EDI{IN EDWARDS, ef=_-g}-, z : Defendants-Appellees. : --------x AFFfDAVIT OF SILAS LEE, IfI STATE OF IOUISIN{A ) ) ss: PARTSH OF ORI,E,ANS ) SILAS LEE, fII, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. f make this affidavit in support of Plaintiffs' llotion for a Preliminary InJunction. 2. I am president of Silas Lee and Associates, a public opinion, research and consulting fitm in New orleans, Louisiana, and Richnond Virginia. Silas Lee and Associates engages in consulting for numerous businesses, retail and fast food corporations, government agencies, boardcasting stations, nevrspapers, politiclans, and banks. It also publishes numerous studies, polls, and comnentaries, nhich have appeared in the New Orleans Times-Picayune, USA Today, the Louisiana Weekly, the Nevada Journal, U.S. Neyrs and Wor1d Report, Ebony, and CBS Evening News, amongt others. 3. I am a sociology LnetttuctLon tn the Loyola University Upward Board Program and a nember of the National Association of Political Consultants. I have been aenred as an exlrert on the social and economic status of blacks Ln Anerica and on public opinion research ln connection sith Judlctal proceedings. 4. The demographic character of the New Orleans netropolitan area means that a district that includes both the city and suburban parishes submerges the city's predominantly black electorate within a larger group of white voters. The racial breakdown of voters within the four-parish area as of March 31, L98?, according to the Louisiana Elections Commissioner, is as follows: TOTAL 506,L77 342 rg5g 159 r 953 31.6 Thus, although the black conmunity in New orleans has an opportunity to elect the candidate it prefers in an Orleans Parish-only contest, the black cornrnunity foms only one-third of the electorate in a four-parish race. The present configruration of the First Supreme Court Dietrict makes it virtually impossible for a black candidate to win. 5. JudlcLal conteete have tradltlonally Lnvolved e>qrensive campaigns. A Euccessful caupalgn withln Orleans ParLsh alone may cost more than $rooro00. In additlon, Judlclal races traditionally have been low visibility races wLthout tremendous voter interest. 6. In contrast to white candldates, noet black candidates Iack the personal financial reeiources to underwrite a significant portion of their campaign. 7. In my opinion as a political coneultant, I would not advise a black candidate to file for a seat on the Louisiana Supreme Court from the First Judicial District in its present form. 8. It would be possible, however, for a black candidate to win election from a district containLng only Orleans Parish. Black candidates have achieved election to Parish-wide office within Orleans Parish. The perception that black candidates have a reasonable chance of success would make fundraising and attracting nedia exposure and support substantially easier. 9. The logistics of a Judicial race require that a candidate begin the planning process long before the actual election. fn my opinion, a black candidate would not be able to compete effectively for a Supreme Court seat unless he or she made the decision to run at least six months prior to the election date. 10. Even if the First Supreme Court District were to be redrawn later this year to contain a district conEisting of orleane Parlsh only, lt rould be dttflcult, 1l not, lqrortble, for a black candldate to uobl.llze flnanclal and polLtlcal tupport ln the ehort tLme renalnl.ng before the OctobeE 1, 1988, clection. sworn to and SubecrLbed Before ue this - day of June 1988. 4