United States v. Allegheny Ludlum Industries Inc. Brief of Defendant-Appellee Companies

Public Court Documents
October 10, 1974

Cite this item

United States v. Allegheny Ludlum Industries Inc. Brief of Defendant-Appellee Companies preview

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

William B Saxbe serving in his capacity as Attorney General on Behalf of Peter J Brennan serving in his capacity as Secretary of Labor and the EEOC acting as Plaintiffs-Appellees. Armco Steel Corporation; Bethlehem Steel Corporation; Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation; National Steel Corporation; Republic Steel Corporation: United States Steel Corporation, Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation; Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company; And United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC acting as defendants-appellees.

Topic
- Economic Justice
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 95412d33-c79a-ee11-be37-000d3a574715

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Letter to Markham from Smiley RE: Exhibits Issues, 1999. 4df50979-e50e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/700ba246-abc5-4152-9a7b-75463660b884/letter-to-markham-from-smiley-re-exhibits-issues. Accessed July 31, 2025.

Copied!

® ® Sy ®

\
State of North Carolina’

MICHAEL F. EASLEY Department of Justice
ATTORNEY GENERAL x P.O. BOX 629 REPLY TO: Tiare B. Smiley

RALEIGH Special Litigation

is (919) 716-6900 2 062
gUe020az9 FAX: (919) 716-6763

November 16, 1999

BY FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL

Mr. Doug Markham

c/o Everett & Everett

Post Office Box 586

Durham, NC 27702

Re: Cromartie - Exhibits Issues

Dear Doug:

We believe we have identified most of the issues from your Second Draft Exhibit List.
Attached are our comments on exhibits we do not have copies of or which we need to review and
compare to determine if we are referring to the same document. We also have tried to note which
exhibits we will not stipulate as joint exhibits. We did not repeat the comments on exhibits listed in
our November 12. 1999 letter so that those problems remain outstanding. Please note, that when we
refer to size D maps, we are referring to the General Assembly’ssize D or 2 x 3 feet. Although there
are some maps that we will stipulate as joint exhibits, where they are being designated by plaintiffs
we consider them to be plaintiffs’ responsibility. We need another draft of the exhibit list that is
closer to a final draft so that we can resolve who is responsible for what.

Finally, we would like to put exhibit numbers on our exhibits and finalize exhibit notebooks.
It would be useful if the parties could meet to review and compare one full set of all exhibits to assure ;
that we are referring to the same document and to designate a final exhibit number. It will then be
possible to work out the number of copies needed and to prepare notebooks. We would like to have

Mr. Doug Markham

November 16, 1999

Page 2

all our exhibits and notebooks completed before Thanksgiving, so we would like to meet with
documents in hand this week.

“

Sincerely,

/ PSY

iare B. Smiley

Special Deputy Attorney Ge
TBS/fa

cc: Adam Stein

Todd Cox

11/16/99 UPDATE ON EXHIBIT LIST ISSUES

Exhibits 101A-C

Exhibits 102, 103, 104

Exhibits 105A-D, 106A-D

Exhibit 107A-B

Exhibit 108

Exhibit 109

Exhibit 110

Exhibits 111-114

Exhibits 115, 117-125

Exhibits 127-129, 131

Exhibits 130, 132, 133

Exhibits 135-143

Exhibit 145

Exhibits 144, 146-149, 151

Exhibits 153, 154, 158

Exhibit 162

Exhibit 163

Exhibits 164-167

Exhibits 169-171

Exhibits 188-195

We have copies; we will not stipulate as a joint exhibit. (We need to
review-and compare.)

We need to review and compare; okay as joint exhibit.

We will provide copies; okay as joint exhibit. (Our maps are in color;
you may want to review and compare.)

Has not been provided; will not stipulate as a joint exhibit.