Dividing the Fifth Circuit

Press Release
December 1, 1978

Dividing the Fifth Circuit preview

Undated, date is approximate.

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Volume 6. Dividing the Fifth Circuit, 1978. 23987d8e-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/302f91be-4cd4-438a-a3b1-b8512ecbbfe2/dividing-the-fifth-circuit. Accessed October 09, 2025.

    Copied!

    th Circuit ag the Fifth Circuit 

as a rider on the 
de the Fifth cir- 
stern Circuit 
issippi. The 

This provision 

o
o
 

ng 
decided not 
matter will 

3 
g
a
 

a,
 

e 

7843. The 
t several weeks. 

Problems 

o
w
 

o
o
 

$f
 

be
y 

327 



federal courts were 
in order to assure that 
pendent of local pressures 
he courts of appeals have 

YY of economic, social 
sion of the Fifth Cir- 

of that diversity. This is well 
ns of judges from the same state; 

es since 1974, the judges from 
Toy es from Missis- 

iberal, moderate 

ct 

a 
ilh 

fey
) 

p fey
 

ct a 
0)
 LS)

 

(ot
s ge 

P
O
W
 

1Q
 

p differences between 
rn Circuits will inevi- 

ons of the new circuits. 
1974, covering a wide 

i from the east and 
@ Court usually 

between the cir- 
tain to substantially 

e Supreme Court. 

the Circuit 

1 

ntolerable ‘ex a} 

te Ju predicted 
ge pellate case 
ud double the 

11 
a5) its would probably 
s every circuit 

both the 
ifth Circuit would have 

1l have to be divided 
reuits. Clearly 
must be found for 

ng circuits. 

the Circuits: Alterna- 
circuit include: 

y circuits. In 1976 
of all cases, 

th Circuits. 
ppellate judges 

icular circuit, 
ice Clark did 

ives to possibly 
a group of 9 

o
O
 

ct
 

OU
 

ck
 

Fh
 

O 

0
0
 

2 

O
o
 

H
O
T
 

r
o
 

O
Q
 

~ 
a
r
 

eli 
udges 

is 
JBag 
Comm. 



th and Ninth Circuits: 3 Pr 

Under the House s nth Circuit would have 23 
judges, almost a n lange of docu- 
ments is harder in tt h includes judges from 
Arizona to Alaska A Ninth Circuit would have a 

ction, since there is 
NEY among the 

ate of California, 
makes no sense to have 

al situations. 

less adverse ee on 

th sa Commission 
m ral Court Appel- 
k 92d Congress, 
x principles be fol- 

pos eireuits.. (a) The 
th <I st 3 states. 
bi only Texas 

) no circuit be 
active judges. 
Circuits would 

circuits contain 
and socio- 

eastern dis- 
Bas histories 

while the western 
or producers, and 

to
mo
ro
w 

trict 
and izing, 

are 

eals were filed 

this problem 
peals per 

he judges will 
ddition the 
evel, and the 
ntially higher 
» had 224 per 

fth Circuit opinions in 1977 
ions of the other judges 

ing cases 



can usually be 
ions in the Fifth 
ing decisions in 
to improve his or 

more likely to read 

A large circuit will 
anels which must be 

laid down by earlier 
occurred because a 

ee or a more 
lation between 
inth Circuits, 

rcies: Even if 
Carter will be 

tern Circuit, and 
he circuit. 

an 

it is tried. 
than the Ninth. 
appellate 

the structure 



hen (225-4853) 
now, Shanon Matts 

Straight 
Alcock (225-7078) 

ob Piedler 
¢ Holtman 
not contact 

by calling 
ressman

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.