Letter to Wadsworth from Blacksher RE: Proposed Rearrangement of Order of Cases for Oral Argument

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Political Participation
Notable Person
- Jack Greenberg
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Matter
- John Davis and Fronzie Hazzard v. State of Alabama
Case
- John Davis and Fronzie Hazzard v. State of Alabama
U.S. state
- Alabama
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 22d7b052-af9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Bolden v. Mobile Hardbacks and Appendices. Letter to Wadsworth from Blacksher RE: Proposed Rearrangement of Order of Cases for Oral Argument, 1977. 6da658c0-cdcd-ef11-8ee9-6045bddb7cb0. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/5b28cffa-8efd-4f3a-a8dd-debbe4dafab6/letter-to-wadsworth-from-blacksher-re-proposed-rearrangement-of-order-of-cases-for-oral-argument. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES & BROWN 

ATTORNEYS AT LAW 

1407 DAVIS AVENUE 

MOBILE, ALABAMA 36603 

VERNON Z. CRAWFORD TELEPHONE 432-1621 

JAMES U. BLACKSHER AREA CODE (203) 

MICHAZL A. FIGURES 

W. CLINTON BROWN, JR. 

GREGORY B. STEIN 

LARRY T. MENEFEE 

June 6, 1977 

Mr. Edward W. Wadsworth, Clerk 
U. S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit 
Room 102 - 600 Camp Street 
U. S. Court of Appeals Courthouse 
New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

Re: Bolden, ‘et Bl. Vv, City Of Mobile, eval. 
Appeals Nos. 76-4210 and 7 7-J0LD : 

  

Dear Mr. Wadsworth: 

We represent the plaintiffs-appellees in the subject appeals, 
which have been set for oral argument on June 13, 1977. Also 
to be argued on the same docket are two other voting rights 
cases, Nevett v. Sides, 76-2951, and B U.L.L. v, Cicy of 
Shreveport, /6-3619. Presently, Nevett is scheduled to be argued 
first, B.U.L.L. v. Shreveport second, and Bolden third. 

    

  

  

I have consulted Mr. Ed Still, counsel for plaintiffs-appellants 
Nevett, et al., and Mr. Charles Williams, counsel for plaintiffs- 
appellees Blacks United for Lasting Leadership, and they join me 
in requesting that the order of oral argument be changed so that 
Bolden v. City of Mobile is argued first, B.U.L.L. v. Shreveport 
second, and Nevett v. Sides third. We believe this rearrangement 
of the order of the cases for oral argument will assist both the 
parties and the Court in focusing on the issues common to all 
three cases. 

    

  

informed by Mr. Charles Arendall, counsel for the defendant- 
ants City of Mobile, et al., that he and Mr. Neil Dixon, 

u 1 for defendants- appellants City of Shreveport, et 2% 
jections to this rearrangement of the order of oral argumen 

ndall attempted to contact Mr. Reid Ba: : “counsel for 

; ees Sides, et al., but was that Mr. Ba 
A kh) —— 

country untill June 7th. 
1 

th 
“i  



Wadsworth, Clerk 

request that you submit our request to the panel 
possible opportunity so that we may have their 

Best regards. 

CRAWFORD, BLACKSHER, FIGURES & BROWN 
— \ 

Vi : / ZL if 
4 /. Y LS 
§ br 

i NA fLARALGALALAR 
.- 

(3. U. Blacksher 

JUB:bsm 

cc: All Counsel

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Davis v. Alabama Printed Record

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in