Columbus Board of Education v. Penick Brief Amici Curiae
Public Court Documents
March 1, 1979

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Lawsuit Against Mississippi Textbook Purchasing Board for Questioning Notions of "White Supremacy", 1975. 0c074426-bb92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/61b5df43-5f0c-482a-9b53-bbfa19840972/lawsuit-against-mississippi-textbook-purchasing-board-for-questioning-notions-of-white-supremacy. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
273 From: Norman Bloomfield NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. 10 Columbus Circle New York, New York 10019 Telephone: 212 586-8397 Contact: Melvyn Levanthal FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE NEW YORK, N. Y., Nov. 5 - The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund today filed a lawsuit against Mississippi authorities responsible for the selection of textbooks used throughout the State, charging that the authorities illegally rejected adoption of a textbook which questions notions of "white supremacy." The suit, filed in the federal district court in Green- ville, Miss., alleges that the officials last year rejected adoption of the textbook, Mississippi: Conflict and Change, because "the text deviates from perspectives of history tradi- tionally acceptable in Mississippi" and "records the role of all Mississippians, black and white, in the State's history." The book was edited by James W. Loewen and Charles Sallis, and published by Pantheon Books in 1974. The action seeks adoption and use of the book in Missis— sippi schools, and requests the court to enjoin the defendants from engaging in policies and practices which discriminate against textbooks containing such perspectives. It terms rejection of the text -- and the policy of selecting only history textbooks sympathetic to principles of racial segrega- tion -- a violation of the rights of school children to a (more) -2- fully non-discriminatory public education, as assured by the Constitution. The complaint alleges that the defendants -- the Missis- sippi Textbook Purchasing Board and its History Textbook Rating Committee -- have "adopted for use in all history courses taught in Mississippi only those texts which minimize, ignore or denigrate the role of blacks and other minorities in the history of the United States or Mississippi and which present historical events in a manner sympathetic to principles of racial segrega- tion and discrimination, black inferiority and 'white supremacy.'" The suit additionally asserts that historians and pub- lishers seeking approval from the Rating Committee have writ- ten and issued textbooks which accommodate such prejudices. Among the named plaintiffs are Dr. Loewen, formerly a professor of sociology at Tougaloo College, Tougaloo, Miss., and Dr. Sallis, a professor of history at Millsaps College, Jackson, Miss. Other-named plaintiffs include Monseigneur Paul V. Canonici, director of educational services, Diocese of Natchez-Jackson; the president and members of the Jefferson County Board of Education; the superintendent and teachers of the Jefferson County School District; Father Luke Mickschl, pastor and superintendent of the Holy Child Jesus Elementary and High School of Canton, Miss.; and black and white students enrolled in public and parochial schools. (more) -3- Mississippi history is a required course in most of the State's schools, and the Purchasing Board is obliged under State law to adopt, purchase and distribute free of charge up to five textbooks for use in all public and other eligible schools. In this instance, the Board adopted one history book, which the plaintiffs assert "espouses the required prejudice." All of the named plaintiffs say they want to use the rejected text, but are unable to do so because of limited financial resources and reluctance to be stigmatized as users of a text rejected by State authorities. The suit also challenges the textbook authorities' decision to refuse the plaintiffs a hearing through which they could present the merits of the text. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund is a completely separate organization, even though established by the NAACP in 1939. It has not been affiliated with the found- ing Association for more than 20 years. The correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. frequently shortened to Legal Defense Fund. The organization has a national staff and headquarters in New York City and works with 400 coope- rating attorneys throughout the country.