Columbus Board of Education v. Penick Brief Amici Curiae

Public Court Documents
March 1, 1979

Columbus Board of Education v. Penick Brief Amici Curiae preview

Date is approximate. Columbus Board of Education v. Penick Brief of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund and the International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America as Amici Curiae

Cite this item

  • Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Columbus Board of Education v. Penick Brief Amici Curiae, 1979. 38c441ff-ad9a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/32c08e0e-1409-491c-8bec-1368ff4c7544/columbus-board-of-education-v-penick-brief-amici-curiae. Accessed May 16, 2025.

    Copied!

    I n  th e

£>uprntt£ (Emtrt of tin' Inttefr Btatvz
October Term, 1978 

No. 78-610

Columbus B oard o f  E ducation, et al.,
Petitioners,

v.

Gary L. Penick, et al.

No. 78-627
Dayton B oard of E ducation, et al.,

Petitioners,
v .

Mark B rinkman, et al.

ON W R IT S  OE CERTIORARI TO T H E  U N IT E D  STATES 
COURT OE A PPEALS FOR T H E  S IX T H  C IR C U IT

BRIEF OF THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND 
EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., AND THE INTERNATIONAL 

UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND 
AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA 

AS AMICI CURIAE

J oseph L. R auh, Jr. Jack Greenberg
J ohn Silard J ames M. Nabrit, III
E lliott C. L ichtman B ill Lann Lee

Ranh, Silard and Lichtman Suite 2030 
1001 Connecticut Avenue, N.W. 10 Columbus Circle 
Washington, D. C. 20036 New York, N. Y . 10019

John P illion 
United Auto Workers 
8000 East Jefferson Avenue 
Detroit, Mich. 48214 

Attorneys for Amici Curiae

March, 1979



I N D E X

PAGE

In t e r e s t  o f  Amici 1

Ar gume n t :

In tro d u ct io n 3

I.  The Court Of Appea ls '  Findings
Of C o n s t i t u t i o n a l  V i o la t i o n s  Are 
Consistent  With This C ourt ' s  
Pr ior  Dec is ions  .................................. 7

A. The Dayton and Columbus
School  Boards Maintained 
I n t e n t i o n a l ly  Segregated 
Systems Pr ior  to the Brown 
D ec is ion  and Fa i led  to Take 
A f f i rm a t iv e  Steps to Desegre­
gate P r ior  to These Lawsuits . . .  7

B. In A dd it io n  to the F a i lure  t o ’
Take A f f i r m a t iv e  A ct ions  to 
Desegregate Dayton and Columbus 
Fo l lowing  Brown, the School  
Boards Maintained R a c ia l l y  
Segregated Systems by 
Aggravating Discr iminatory
Acts ...........................................................  17

I I .  The Sixth C i r c u i t  Has Properly 
Applied The Equitable  P r i n c i p l e  
That A Remedy Must Be Reasonably 
Related To The V i o la t i o n  .......................  24

A. The Dayton I Requirement o f  
Findings o f  Incremental  
Segregative E f f e c t  Should 
Either  Be Interpre ted  in 
Harmony with Keyes, as the Sixth 
C i r c u i t  Read I t ,  or  I t  Should
Be Overruled 24

l



B. These Cases W i l l  Determine the 
Future o f  School  Desegregation 
in the North .........................................  31

Conclus ion .............................................................................  35

Table o f  A u t h o r i t i e s

Cases:

Brown v. Board o f  Education,  347 U.S.
483 .........................................................................  2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ,

6 , 7 , 8 . 9 ,  
11 ,13 ,1 4 ,  
16 ,17 ,1 9 ,

Clemons v.  Board o f  Education o f  H i l l s b o r o ,
Ohio, 228 F .2d 853 ( 6th C ir .  1956) . . .  13

C i v i l  Rights Cases,  109 U.S. 3 .........................  34

Columbus Board o f  Education v. Penick,
58 L Ed 2d 55 ....................................... ............  27

Davis v.  School  Commissioners o f  Mobile
County, 402 U.S. 33 ..................................  31

Dayton Board o f  Education v. Brinkman,
433 U.S. 406 .............................................. 5 , 6 , 2 0 , 2 4 ,

25 ,26 ,2 7 ,
28,29

Green v. County School  Board, 391
U.S. 430 ..................................................... 2 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 1 5 ,

16,29,30

Keyes v.  School D i s t r i c t  No. 1, Denver,
Colorado,  413 U.S. 189................. 2 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 1 4 ,

1 5 ,1 7 ,2 4 ,2 7 ,2 8 ,
2 9 ,3 0 ,3 2 ,3 3 ,3 4

PAGE

-  i i  -



M il l ik e n  v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 755 ..............  33

Plessy  v .  Ferguson, 163 U.S 537 ..................... 34

Poindexter  v. Greenhow, 114 U.S.
270 .........................................................................  30

Swann v. Char lotte-Mecklenburg Board
o f  Education,  402 U.S. 1 .......................  2 , 4 , 5 , 7 ,

9 ,16 ,17 ,
30,31,32

United States  v .  Montgomery County 
Board o f  Education,
395 U.S. 225 ................................................  4

Other A u th o r i t i e s

S i l a r d ,  Toward Nationwide School
Desegregat ion :  A "Compell ing State
I n t e r e s t "  Test o f  Rac ial  Concentra­
t i o n  in Publ ic  Educat ion , 5l 
N. Car. L. Rev. 675 (1973) ..................  33

Wright,  Publ ic  School  D e seg reg at ion :
Legal Remedies f o r  De Facto 
S eg reg at ion , 40 N.Y.U. L. Rev.
285 (1965)  ..................................................  33

U.S Comm, on C i v i l  Rights,
DESEGREGATION OF THE NATION'S 
PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A STATUS REPORT
(Feb. 1979)

PAGE

-  i i i  -

31,32



IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER TERM, 1978 
No. 78-610

COLUMBUS BOARD OF EDUCATION, et  a l . ,

P e t i t i o n e r s ,

GARY L. PENICK, et  a l .

No. 78-627

DAYTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, et  a l . ,

P e t i t i o n e r s ,

-  v -

MARK BRINKMAN, e t  a l .

On Writs Of C e r t i o r a r i  To The United States 
Court Of Appeals For The Sixth C i r cu i t

BRIEF OF THE NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL 
FUND, INC., AND THE INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED 
AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT 

WORKERS OF AMERICA AS AMICI CURIAE

I n t e r e s t  o f  Amici*

The NAACP Legal  Defense and Educational  Fund, 
I n c . ,  i s  a n o n - p r o f i t  c o r p o r a t i o n  e s t a b l i s h e d

^Letters  o f  the p a r t i e s  consenting  to  the f i l i n g  
o f  th is  b r i e f  by amici have been f i l e d  with the 
Clerk.



2

under the laws o f  the State o f  New York. I t  was 

formed to  a s s i s t  black  persons to  secure  th e i r  

c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  r i g h t s  by the p r o s e c u t i o n  o f  
lawsuits .  I t s  charter  de c la r e s  that i t s  purposes 

inc lu de  rendering l e g a l  s e r v i ce s  g r a t u i t o u s ly  to 
black  persons s u f f e r i n g  i n j u s t i c e  by reason of  

r a c i a l  d i s c r im in a t io n .  (The Legal  Defense Fund 
i s  not par t  o f  the N a t i o n a l  A s s o c i a t i o n  f o r  

the Advancement o f  Colored People ( NAACP) although 
i t  was founded by i t  and shares i t s  commitment to 

equal  r i g h t s .  The Legal  Defense Fund has had f o r  
over 20 years a separate board,  program, s t a f f ,  

o f f i c e  and b u d g e t . )  For  many y e a r s  a t t o r n e y s  
a s s o c i a t e d  w i t h  the L e g a l  D e f e n s e  Fund have 

represente d  black  parents and s c h o o l  c h i ld r e n  in 
s c h o o l  desegregat ion  l i t i g a t i o n  b e f o r e  t h i s  Court 
and numerous lower c o u r t s ,  see,  e . g . ,  Brown v.  
Board o f  Educati on , 347 U.S. 483;  Green v.  County 

School  Board, 391 U.S. 430; Swann v.  C h a r l o t t e -  

Mecklenburg Board o f  Educat ion . 402 U.S. 1; Keyes 

v .  S c h o o l  D i s t r i c t  No. 1, Denver, C o lorado , 413 

U.S. 189. The Legal  Defense Fund b e l i e v e s  that  

i t s  e x p e r i e n c e  g a in e d  in  p r o s e c u t i n g  s c h o o l  
desegregat ion  ac t ion s  and a s s i s t i n g  in the deseg­

re g a t io n  process in schoo l  d i s t r i c t s  throughout 
the Nation may b e n e f i t  the Court in dec id ing  the 
instant cases .



3

The In t e r n a t i o n a l  Union, United Automobile,  
Aerospace and A g r i c u l t u r a l  Implement Workers o f  
America (UAW) represents  some 1,500,000 a c t i v e  

workers,  and t h e i r  f a m i l i e s ,  in the automobile ,  

a e r o s p a c e ,  a g r i c u l t u r a l  implement and r e l a t e d  

i n d u s t r i e s .  Inc luding spouses and c h i ld r e n ,  UAW 

r e p r e s e n t s  more than 4 - 1 / 2  m i l l i o n  p e r s o n s  
throughout the United States and Canada. The UAW, 

s in ce  i t s  founding days back in the m id - 3 0 ' s ,  has 

worked d i l i g e n t l y  against  a l l  forms o f  d i s c r im in a ­

t i o n  and r a c i s m  and in  f a v o r  o f  an e v e r  more 
i n t e g r a t e d  s o c i e t y .  UAW b e l i e v e s  i n  s c h o o l  

i n t e g r a t i o n  i n  a l l  a r e a s  o f  the N a t i o n  and i s  
d e e p l y  c o n c e r n e d  l e s t  the  C o u r t ' s  d e c i s i o n  in 

these cases turn back the c l o c k  on school  desegre ­

g a t i o n  i n  the N orth .  UAW i s  d e d i c a t e d  t o  an 
i n d u s t r i a l  s o c i e t y  in  which  b l a c k  and w h i t e  

workers l i v e  in  harmony in the m i l l s  and f a c t o r i e s  

and b e l i e v e s  t h a t  a s o c i e t y  s e p a r a t e d  i n  the 
schoo ls  w i l l  never be a s o c i e t y  in tegrated  in the 
m i l l s  and f a c t o r i e s .

ARGUMENT

In tro d u ct io n

A q u a r t e r  c e n t u r y  a f t e r  Brown v.  Board o f  
Education , 347 U.S. 483, these cases bring the 
Court and Nation to an important c r o ss in g  in the



-  4

road to  the e l im in a t i o n  o f  r a c i a l  se g re g at io n  in 

p u b l i c  s c h o o l s .  We urge the Court to a f f i r m  the 

d e c i s i o n s  of  the Court o f  Appeals f o r  the Sixth 

C i r c u i t ,  which has f o l low ed  th is  C ou r t ' s  d e c i ­

s i o n s ,  and to r e s i s t  the demands o f  p e t i t i o n e r s  

f o r  r e s t r i c t i v e  r u le s  which w i l l  have the p r a c t i ­
c a l  e f f e c t  o f  preserv ing  r a c i a l  se g re g at io n  in the 

schoo ls  by e f f e c t i v e l y  pre c lu d in g  i t s  e l im in a t i o n .
One m a jo r  t h r u s t  o f  t h i s  C o u r t ' s  l e a d i n g  

d e c i s i o n s  implementing Brown has been an emphasis 

on p r a c t i c a l  r e m e d i a l  r u l e s  which a c t u a l l y  
r e s u l t  in the e l im in a t i o n  o f  se g re g at io n .  That i s  

the major c o n t r ib u t i o n  o f  such d e c i s i o n s  as Green 

v .  County S c h o o l  B o a r d , 391 U .S .  430 ,  U n ited  
S t a t e s  v .  Montgomery County Board o f  Educati on , 

395 U.S. 225, Swann v.  Char lotte-Mecklenburg Board 
o f  E d u c a t i o n , 402 U .S .  1, and Keyes v .  S c h o o l  
D i s t r i c t  No. 1, Denver, C o lorado , 413 U.S. 189. 

P r i o r  t o  Green and Swann the h o l d i n g  o f  Brown 

o f t e n  e x is t e d  as a r i g h t  without a remedy. A f te r  
Green and Swann many communities desegregated  f o r  

the f i r s t  time because o f  the new emphasis on the 

a f f i r m a t iv e  duty to  desegregate by means such as 
t h o s e  app roved  in  Swann. Keyes a p p l i e d  t h e s e  

p r i n c i p l e s  to a northern sch oo l  d i s t r i c t  which had 
pervasive se g re g at io n  caused by o f f i c i a l  p o l i c i e s



5

without the san c t ion  o f  s t a t e  s ta t u t e .  Although 

se g r e g a t io n  in the Denver s ch o o ls  in Keyes was not 

t o t a l  as i t  had been in Green and Swann, the Court 
h e l d  t h a t  s u b s t a n t i a l  s y s t e m i c  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  

would c a l l  f o r  a systemwide desegreg at ion  decree .  
Keyes thus guided lower fe d e r a l  courts  in d e t e r ­

mining when to  ho ld  a p a r t i a l l y  segregated  north ­
ern sch o o l  system to  be equ iva lent  t o ,  and sub jec t  

to the same remedies as,  a c l a s s i c  dual system. 
The Sixth C i r c u i t  has f a i t h f u l l y  app l ied the Keyes 

ru les  in these Ohio cases .
The Columbus and Dayton schoo l  boards ask the 

Court t o  make a fundamental turn away from the 
course i t  charted from Brown to  Keyes■ Indeed, 
they  se e k  t o  r e v e r s e  Keyes by b u i l d i n g  upon a 

passage in the C ou rt ' s  1977 Dayton I op in ion  which 
a c t u a l ly  c i t e d  Keyes:

"The duty o f  both the D i s t r i c t  Court and 
the Court o f  Appeals in a case  such as t h i s ,  
where mandatory  s e g r e g a t i o n  by law o f  the  
races in sch oo ls  has long s in c e  ceased,  i s  to  
f i r s t  determine whether there was any a c t i o n  
i n  t h e  c o n d u c t  o f  t h e  b u s i n e s s  o f  t h e  
s ch o o l  board which was intended t o ,  and did 
i n  f a c t ,  d i s c r i m i n a t e  a g a i n s t  m i n o r i t y  
p u p i l s ,  t e ach e rs ,  or  s t a f f .  Washington v. 
Davis,  supra. A l l  p a r t i e s  should be f r e e  to  
introduce  such a d d i t i o n a l  testimony and other 
e v i d e n c e  as the  D i s t r i c t  Court  may deem 
appropr ia te .  I f  such v i o l a t i o n s  are found,



-  6

the  D i s t r i c t  Court  i n  the  f i r s t  i n s t a n c e ,  
s u b j e c t  t o  review by the Court o f  Appeals,  
must determine how much incremental  s e g re g a ­
t i v e  e f f e c t  t h e s e  v i o l a t i o n s  had on the  
r a c i a l  d i s t r i b u t i o n  o f  t h e  Dayton s c h o o l  
p o p u l a t i o n  as p r e s e n t l y  c o n s t i t u t e d ,  when 
t h a t  d i s t r i b u t i o n  i s  compared t o  what i t  
would  have been  in  the a b s e n c e  o f  such 
c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n s .  The remedy must 
be designed to redress that  d i f f e r e n c e ,  and 
only i f  there has been a systemwide impact 
may there  be a systemwide remedy. Keyes, 413 
U .S . ,  at 213. (Dayton Board o f  Education v . 
Brinkman, 433 U.S. 406, 4 20 . )

The p e t i t i o n e r s  would turn the " incremental  
se g r e g a t iv e  e f f e c t "  language o f  Dayton I in t o  a 

ru le  that would measure the r igh ts  o f  m in o r i t i e s  
with a "micrometer"  -  t o  borrow Judge W ein s te in ' s  

apt word.—̂ I f  th is  Court i n t e r p r e t e d  the " i n c r e ­
m enta l  e f f e c t "  r e q u i r e m e n t  as a f u l l - f l e d g e d  

r e t r e a t  from Keyes i t  would turn i t s  back on the 
problem o f  se g re g at io n  by adm in is tra t ive  p r a c t i c e  

and p o l i c i e s  in those communities which never had 

s ta t u t o ry  s ch o o l  s e g r e g a t io n .  Such a r e t r e a t  from 

Keyes would cut o f f  any hope o f  i n t e g r a t i n g  the 

schoo ls  o f  many o f  our n a t i o n ' s  communities and 

represent a t r a g i c  turning  away from Brown. The 

Sixth C i r c u i t  read Dayton I in a way which harmon-

1/ Judge Jack B. W e in s te in ' s  as yet  unpublished 
speech at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School  o f  Law 
c r i t i c i z e d  ru l in gs  which "measure compassion f o r  
m i n o r i t i e s  and the  p oor  w i th  a m i c r o m e t e r . "



7

ized  i t s  language with Keyes, Swann and Green and

r e j e c t e d  the c a l l  f o r  a fundamental r e t r e a t  in the

e f f o r t  t o  v i n d i c a t e  the r ig h t  to  a nondiscr imina -

tory  p u b l i c  educati on .  We submit,  in the argument

which f o l l o w s ,  that  the Sixth C i r cu i t  was e n t i r e l y

c o r r e c t  in f in d in g  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n s  in

both case s ,  and in conc lu d in g  that  the v i o l a t i o n s

were s u f f i c i e n t l y  s u b s t a n t ia l  in t h e i r  e f f e c t s  as
to  demand system at ic ,  and not piecemeal ,  remedies.

The Court Of Appeal 's  Findings o f  C on st i tu ­
t i o n a l  V i o l a t i o n s  Are Co n s i s t e n t  With This 
C ou rt ' s  P r ior  D e c i s i o n s .

A. The Dayton and Columbus S c h o o l  Boards 
M a i n t a in e d  I n t e n t i o n a l l y  S e g r e g a t e d  
Systems P r i o r  To The Brown D e c i s i o n  
And F a i l e d  To Take A f f i r m a t i v e  S tep s  
To Desegregate Pr ior  To These Lawsuits.

Two unanimous p a n e l s  o f  the  S i x t h  C i r c u i t  
found that  the Columbus and Dayton school  boards 

had engaged  i n  i n t e n t i o n a l  r a c i a l  s e g r e g a t i o n  

in v i o l a t i o n  o f  the Equal P r o t e c t i o n  Clause o f  the 
Fourteenth Amendment. A common feature  o f  the two 

cases ,  found by both panels ,  i s  that the school  

systems were d i s c r im in ato ry  at the time o f  Brown 

and that  steps to  desegregate them had never been 
undertaken by the schoo l  a u t h o r i t i e s .  The 1954



8

s e g r e g a t i o n  was e x t e n s i v e ,  a f f e c t i n g  at  l e a s t  

54 percent o f  Dayton's  b lack  pupil s  and 46 percent  

o f  Columbus'  b l a c k  e l e m e n t a r y  and j u n i o r  h ig h  

p u p i l s ,  and th e  p r e s e n t  s e g r e g a t i o n  can  be 

d i r e c t l y  tr aced  to  that foundation .  See i n f r a .

Columbus.
In the Columbus c a s e  the pa n e l  (Ju dges  

Edwards, L ive ly  and M e r r i t t )  he ld  that  the f a i l u r e  
to desegregate  the pre-1954 dn jure  system would 

have been a s u f f i c i e n t  bas is  t o  a f f i r m  the d i s ­
t r i c t  c o u r t ' s  f in d in g  o f  present u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  

s e g r e g a t i o n  even i f  t h e r e  had been no o t h e r  

p r o o f .  (Of course there was ex tens ive  p r o o f  o f  
recent s e g r e g a t iv e  a c t i o n s  as w e l l ,  as we s h a l l  

d i s cu ss  b e l o w . )  D i s t r i c t  Judge Duncan's c a r e f u l  
an a lys i s  o f  p r e -Brown se g re g at io n  (429 F. Supp. at 
234-238) i s  b r i e f l y  summarized by the Court o f  

Appeals (583 F.2d at 796-799) ,  which observed that 
Judge Duncan's f in d in g  that the Columbus system 

was dual and unlawful  in  1954 were not s e r i o u s l y
c h a l l e n g e d  in  the  b r i e f s  or  o r a l  argument on

2 /appeal .  583 F.2d at 798.— Sim i lar ly  in th is

2 /  The "en c lave  o f  separate,  b lack  s c h o o l s , "  
i . e . ,  Champion Junior High School and four elemen- 
tary s c h o o l s ,  Mount Vernon, G a r f i e ld ,  Fel ton  and 
P i lg r im ,  was c r e a te d ,  maintained and expanded from 
1909 forward in e a s t - c e n t r a l  Columbus through the 
use o f  c l a s s i c  segregatory  d e v i c e s  such as the 
ass ig n m e n t  o f  f a c u l t y  and s t a f f  on r a c i a l l y  
i d e n t i f i a b l e  bases,  gerrymandering o f  zones,  and



9

Court the board devotes but two paragraphs o f  i t s  

over f o r t y - p a g e  f a c t  statement to  the pre-1954 

e r a ,  d i s m i s s i n g  t h e  s e g r e g a t o r y  p r a c t i c e s  as 
" r e p r e h e n s i b l e "  but  w i t h o u t  c u r r e n t  impact  
on the system. P e t i t i o n e r s '  B r i e f ,  No. 78-610,  p. 

39. However, the Courts below demonstrated that  

the " r e p r e h e n s i b l e "  d i s c r im in a t io n  was d i r e c t l y  
connected to  current c o n d i t i o n s .  By the time o f  

Brown the Board had created  "an enclave o f  f i v e  
a l l - b l a c k  schoo ls  which d e l i b e r a t e l y  i s o l a t e d  a 

s u b s ta n t ia l  po r t i o n  o f  the b lack  c h i ld r e n  in the 
system in  a l l - b l a c k  s c h o o l s  a l l  with black  p r i n c i ­

pals and a heavy c o n c e n t r a t io n  o f  black  teachers .  
Although se g re g at io n  in Columbus schoo ls  was not 

t o t a l  in 1954, the Court o f  Appeals found that 

i n t e n t i o n a l  seg reg at ion  did  a f f e c t  "a su bs tan t ia l  

p o r t i o n  o f  b lack  students ,  as shown by the D is ­
t r i c t  Judge 's  f ind ings  and as supported by the 

r e c o r d . "  583 F .2d  at  801.  A p p r o x i m a t e l y  46 
percent o f  b lack  elementary and ju n ior  high pupil s

2/  C o n t 'd .

the use o f  o p t i o n a l  zones.  See, Keyes v. School  
D i s t r i c t  No. 1 , supra , 413 U.S. at 201-202; Swann 
v .  Char 1 o 11  e - M e c k 1enburg  Board o f  E d u c a t i o n , 
s u p r a , 402 U .S .  at 2 0 - 2 1 .  The d i s t r i c t  c o u r t  
express ly  noted that  " [ d ] efendants do not appear 
to  asse r t  that these r e s u l t s  were an accommodation 
to the neighborhood sch oo l  c o n c e p t . "  429 F. Supp. 
at 236.



10

in the system attended these  f i v e  de jure  s e g r e -
3/  --------------gated s c h o o l s . — The co u r ts  below found that the

1975-76 p u p i l  assignment f i g u r e s  demonstrate that

the board had never c a r r i e d  out i t s  continuing

c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  duty t o  desegregate  the Columbus

schoo ls  in two and a h a l f  decades.  583 F.2d at
800.

Dayton.

The panel  in the Dayton case (Judges P h i l l i p s ,  
Peck and L i v e l y )  reached a s im i la r  c o n c lu s io n :

A l th o u gh  we b e l i e v e  t h i s  f i n d i n g  t o  
have been i m p l i c i t  in the prev ious  d e c i s i o n s  
o f  t h i s  c o u r t ,  we now e x p r e s s l y  h o l d  t h a t  
at  the t ime o f  Brown I , d e f e n d a n t s  were 
i n t e n t i o n a l l y  o p e r a t i n g  a d u a l  sy s te m  in 
v i o l a t i o n  of  the Equal P r o t e c t i o n  Clause o f  
the  f o u r t e e n t h  amendment. Our h o l d i n g  i s  
b a s e d  upon s u b s t a n t i a l  e v i d e n c e ,  much o f  
which  i s  u n d i s p u t e d .  The f i n d i n g  o f  the  
d i s t r i c t  c o u r t  to  the c o n t r a r y  [ f o o t n o t e  
omitted]  i s  c l e a r l y  erroneous,  Rule 52, Fed. 
R. Civ.  P . ,  and i s  based upon both a f a i l u r e  
to  a t t r i b u t e  the proper l e g a l  s i g n i f i c a n c e  to 
the ev idence  o f  p r e -Brown I v i o l a t i o n s  and 
upon v a r i o u s  e r r o r s  o f  law .  583 F .2 d  at  
247.

3/  In 1954-55, systemwide enrol lment was 55,354 
p u p i l s ,  i n c l u d i n g  3 2 , 6 4 2  e l e m e n t a r y  s t u d e n t s ,  
12,647 ju n i o r  high students and 8,348 high sch oo l  
student s .



11

The D i s t r i c t  Judge acknowledged in t e n t i o n a l  

s e g r e g a t io n  e x i s t e d  p r i o r  t o  Brown, but dismissed 

the case and granted no r e l i e f  on the ground that 

" [ a ] c t s  o f  i n t e n t io n a l  seg reg at ion  which ended in  

excess  o f  twenty years ago are not c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  

v i o l a t i o n s  in  the  a b s e n c e  o f  a showing  o f  an 

incremental  s e g r e g a t iv e  e f f e c t  t h e r e o f . "  Pet. 
f o r  C e r t i o r a r i ,  No. 7 6 - 6 2 7 ,  p .  188a.  In r e ­
v e rs in g  th is  c o n c lu s io n  the Sixth C i r c u i t  noted 

t h a t  t h e  Dayton  Board had an o v e r t  p o l i c y  o f  

f a c u l t y  se g r e g a t io n  which forbade black  teachers

3/  C o n t 'd .

PI .  L. Ex. 61 at p. 28 .  B lack  e n r o l l m e n t  was 
a p p r o x i m a t e l y  15 p e r c e n t  in  t h i s  p e r i o d .  429 
F.Supp. at 268; 583 F .2d at 799. The approximate 
number o f  b lack  students was 8,303 pupil s  system- 
wide, 4 ,896 elementary pupils  and 1,897 ju n io r  
high.

The 1 954 -55  e n r o l l m e n t  at  b l a c k  Champion 
ju n i o r  high was 739, and the enrol lment at black  
B e a t t y  Park (which  r e p l a c e d  the  Mount Vernon 
s c h o o l ) ,  Fe l ton ,  G a r f i e ld  and Pi lgr im elementary 
schoo ls  was 2,384 .  PI.  L. Ex. 61 at pp. 22-24.

Thus,  4 8 . 7  p e r c e n t  o f  b l a c k  e l e m e n t a r y  
students (2 ,384  o f  4 ,896 )  in  the Columbus schoo l  
system attended the four black s c h o o l s ,  and 39.0 
p e r c e n t  (739  o f  1 , 8 9 7 )  o f  b l a c k  j u n i o r  h igh 
students attended Champion. O vera l l ,  46 .0  percent 
o f  b l a c k  e l e m e n t a r y  and j u n i o r  h igh  s t u d e n t s  
(3 ,123 o f  6 ,793 )  attended the f i v e  s c h o o l s ,  and 
37.6 percent o f  black  pupil s  systemwide (3 ,123  o f  
8 ,303 )  attended the f ive  s c h o o l s .



12

from teaching  white or  mixed classrooms u n t i l  at 

l e a s t  1951-52 and e f f e c t i v e l y  continued the p o l i c y  

th rou gh  the 1970 -71  s c h o o l  y e a r .  583 F .2 d  at 

247-248. The co u r t  found the f a c u l t y  se g r e g a t io n  

p o l i c y  " i n e x t r i c a b l y  t i e d  to  r a c i a l l y  motivated 

student assignment p r a c t i c e s . "  I b i d . For example, 

by s t a f f i n g  s c h o o l s  such as Dunbar High w i t h  

a l l - b l a c k  f a c u l t i e s  who were fo rb idden  to  teach 

w h i t e  p u p i l s  the  board  e s t a b l i s h e d  a c i t y w i d e  

a l l - b l a c k  h ig h  s c h o o l  wh ich  o p e r a t e d  s o  much 
apart from Dayton 's  white  system that i t s  a t h l e t i c  

teams were fo rb idden  to compete with other  Dayton 
s c h o o l s .  This t o t a l  separat ion  was e x a c t ly  in  the 

c l a s s i c  pa t tern  o f  dual systems in  the Deep South. 
To be sure,  some b lack  pu p i l s  were permitted to  

a t t e n d  o t h e r  Dayton h igh  s c h o o l s  w h ich  were 
predominantly white ,  but they were segregate d  and 

d isc r im in ate d  against  wi th in  schoo ls  by p r a c t i c e s  

such as " separate  f a c i l i t i e s ,  in c lu d in g  separate 

swimming poo ls  and l o cker  room f a c i l i t i e s  

maintained at Roosevel t  [ s c h o o l ]  f o r  b lack  and 

w h i t e  s t u d e n t s "  u n t i l  abou t  1950 ( 583  F .2 d  at  

251) ,  the t o t a l  e x c lu s i o n  o f  b lack  c h i ld r e n  from 

the swimming pool  at S t e e l e  High School  (A. 423-



13

424) and the se g r e g a t io n  o f  black  c h i ld r e n  in the 

back rows o f  c l a s s e s  they did  attend with whites .  

(A. 9 0 ) .  The Court  o f  A p p e a l s  n o t e d  th at  the

" c h o i c e "  o f  a t te nd ing  Dunbar was fo r  many b lacks  

"merely a l e s s  d r a s t i c  a l t e r n a t i v e  than attending 

o th er  s ch o o ls  which p r a c t i c e d  i n t r a - s c h o o l  segre ­
g a t i o n  and d i s c r i m i n a t i o n . "  583 F .2d at 250.

The Court  o f  A p p e a l s  d e s c r i b e d  com parab le  

manipulations which c rea ted  a l l - b l a c k  elementary 

s c h o o l s ,  and concluded that  "a t  the time o f  Brown 

JL> approximately 54.3 percent o f  the black  pupils  

in the Dayton schoo l  system were assigned to  four 
s ch o o ls  that  had a l l  black f a c u l t i e s  and student

4/b o d i e s . " -  583 F.2d at 251. The Court o f  Appeals 
sa id  that " G a r f i e l d ,  W i l lard ,  Wogamon and Dunbar 

s ch o o ls  were d e l i b e r a t e l y  segregated  or r a c i a l l y  
imbalanced due t o  the a c t i o n s  o f  defendants"  (583 

F.2d at 251) ,  that  th is  d i s c r im in a t io n  was not 

" c o n f i n e d  in one d i s t i n c t  area"  (583 F.2d at 252) ,

4 /  The Court o f  Appeals found that beginning in 
1912, the Dayton schoo l  board continuous ly  main­
tained  f i r s t  a l l - b l a c k  c l a s s e s  and then a l l - b l a c k  
sch o o ls  on the West Side o f  Dayton through the use 
o f  " s u b t e r f u g e [ s ] to  segregate  c h i l d r e n , "  (Clemons 
v. Board o f  Education o f  H i l l s b o r o ,  Ohio, 228 F.2d 
853, 856 ( 6th Cir .  1956))  such as student t ran s fe r  
p o l i c i e s ,  assignment o f  f a c u l t y  and s t a f f  on a 
r a c i a l l y  i d e n t i f i a b l e  b a s is ,  and the use o f  dual 
over lapping  attendance zones.  583 F.2d at 249-  
251.



14 -

but rather  that the " s e g r e g a t iv e  p r a c t i c e s  at the 

time o f  Brown I i n f e c t e d  the e n t i r e  Dayton p u b l i c  

s ch o o l  system" ( I b i d . ) by working to  "maintain 
o th er  schoo ls  in the d i s t r i c t  as predominantly 

w h i t e . "  ( I b i d . ) The Court found that  the d i s t r i c t  

not only f a i l e d  to  adopt an e f f e c t i v e  desegrega­

t i o n  program a f t e r  Brown, but that  i t s  a c t ions  
" a c t u a l l y  have exacerbated the r a c i a l  separat ion  

e x i s t i n g  at the time o f  Brown I . "  (583 F.2d at 

253) .

Columbus and Dayton

In l i g h t  o f  the  f i n d i n g s  o f  the C ourt  o f  

Appeals that both systems were dual at the time o f  

Brown and that  there was no e f f o r t  to dismantle  

these  dual systems, the co n c lu s io n s  o f  c o n s t i t u ­
t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n  are f i rmly  based on Keyes. In 

K e y e s , a f t e r  f i r s t  n o t i n g  t h a t  s e g r e g a t i o n  in  
Denver had not been s t a t u t o r y ,  the C o u rt ' s  op in ion  

s ta ted  that  " n e v e r t h e le s s ,  where p l a i n t i f f s  prove 

that  the schoo l  a u t h o r i t i e s  have c a r r i e d  out a 
s y s t e m a t i c  program o f  s e g r e g a t i o n  a f f e c t i n g  a 
s u b s t a n t i a l  p o r t i o n  o f  th e  s t u d e n t s ,  s c h o o l s ,  

teachers and f a c i l i t i e s  wi th in  the s ch o o l  system, 
i t  i s  only common sense to conc lude that  there 

e x i s t s  a pre d ica te  f o r  a f in d in g  o f  the e x is t e n c e  
o f  a dual schoo l  sy stem."  413 U.S. at 201. The 

Keyes o p i n i o n  h e l d  t h a t  in the  a b s e n c e  o f  a

showing  t h a t  r a c i a l l y  i n s p i r e d  s c h o o l  board



15 -

a c t i o n s  were l im i te d  t o  "s ep ara te ,  i d e n t i f i a b l e  

and unre la ted  u n i t s , "  then " p r o o f  o f  state - imposed  
s e g r e g a t i o n  i n  a s u b s t a n t i a l  p o r t i o n  o f  the 
d i s t r i c t  w i l l  s u f f i c e  to support a f in d in g  by the 

t r i a l  c o u r t  o f  the e x i s t e n c e  o f  a dual system."  
There is no p l a u s i b l e  c la im in  e i t h e r  Dayton or 

Columbus t h a t  t h e  p r e - 1 9 5 4  d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  was 

l im i te d  t o  " se p ara te ,  i d e n t i f i a b l e  and unrelated 

u n i t s . "  Rather,  the Court o f  Appeals proper ly  
found that such d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  was s u f f i c i e n t l y  

i n t e g r a l  and s y s t e m a t i c  t o  r e n d e r  them dual  
r a c i a l  systems. And as the Court sa id  in Keyes, 

"where that f in d in g  i s  made, as in cases invo lv in g  
s t a t u t o ry  dual  systems, the school  a u t h o r i t i e s  

have an a f f i r m a t iv e  duty ' t o  e f f e c t u a t e  a t r a n s i ­
t i o n  t o  a r a c i a l l y  n o n d i s c r i m i n a t o r y  s c h o o l  

sys tem . '  Brown I I ,  supra at 301. "  413 U.S. at 

203.

The main s i g n i f i c a n c e  o f  1954 i s  th at  the 

b o a r d ' s  c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  duty to  desegregate stems 
from t h a t  t im e .  The f i n d i n g  th a t  the s e g r e ­
gated s i t u a t i o n  which e x is t e d  in 1954 s t i l l  e x i s t s  

in  the 1 9 7 0 ' s  d e m o n s t r a t e s  t h a t  no e f f e c t i v e  

d e s e g r e g a t i o n  p l a n ,  ( Green v .  County S c h o o l  

B o a r d , s u p r a , 391 U .S .  at 4 3 9 - 4 4 0 )  had been 

implemented in Dayton or  Columbus. Of course i f  
e i t h e r  system had become in tegrated  in  the years 

s in ce  1954, then an inquiry  about new c o n s t i t u ­
t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n s  would  be r e q u i r e d . But the



16

segregated  sch o o ls  o f  the 1970 's t r a c e  d i r e c t l y  

t o  the pre-1954 se g r e g a t io n  without any in t e r v e n ­
ing era o f  desegregat ion .  Indeed,  there is no 

c la im in e i t h e r  case that an e f f e c t i v e  desegrega­

t i o n  p l a n  has been im plem ented .  Both b o a r d s  

defended on the ground that  they were not o p e r a t ­

ing dual systems in 1954. Having l o s t  on t h i s  

d e f e n s e ,  and h a v in g  f a i l e d  t o  show t h a t  the  

systems were ever subsequently desegregate d ,  Green 

and Swann requ ire  a judgement against  the de fe n ­

dants.
As we s h a l l  d i s c u s s  b e l o w ,  the p o s t - 1 9 5 4  

ac t ion s  o f  the sch oo l  a u t h o r i t i e s  were not r a c i a l ­

ly  n e u t r a l .  But even  i f  d e f e n d a n t s  arguments 

o f  n e u t r a l i t y  were v a l i d ,  Swann teaches that "an 
assignment plan i s  not acce p tab le  simply because 

i t  app ears  t o  be n e u t r a l . "  402 U.S .  a t  28.  

Even i f  the  Dayton and Columbus a u t h o r i t i e s '  
a c t io n s  s ince  Brown are assumed arguendo t o  have 

be e n  n e u t r a l ,  the  r e s u l t s  o b t a i n e d  from t h e i r  

p o l i c i e s  which concededly eschewed any a f f i r m a t iv e  
d e s e g r a t i v e  a c t i o n  f a i l e d  t o  " c o u n t e r a c t  the 

continuing  e f f e c t s  o f  past  schoo l  s e g r e g a t i o n . "  
Swann, supra , 402 U.S. at 28. A c co rd in g ly ,  the 

Sixth C i r c u i t  was c o r r e c t  in f in d in g  systemwide 

c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n s ,  and systemwide e f f o r t s



17

to desegregate  the systems are required  by Swann 
and Keyes.

B. In A d d i t i o n  To The F a i l u r e  To Take 
A f f i r m a t i v e  A c t i o n s  To D e s e g r e g a t e  
Dayton and Columbus Fol lowing Brown, 
The School  Boards Maintained R a c ia l l y  
S e g r e g a t e d  Systems By A g g r a v a t i n g  
Discr im inatory  Acts .

Both Sixth C i r c u i t  panels r e j e c t e d  the school  
b o a r d s ' arguments that th e i r  conduct s ince  the 

Brown d e c i s i o n  had be e n  r a c i a l l y  n e u t r a l ,  and 
instead found the e x is t e n c e  o f  i l l i c i t  i n t e n t i o n ­

a l l y  s e g r e g a t o r y  a c t i o n s  and p o l i c i e s ,  w i th  
systemwide impacts.

Columbus.
In the Columbus case the Sixth C i r c u i t  panel 

endorsed the t r i a l  ju d g e ' s  ex ten s ive  f ind ings  that 

the s c h o o l  a u t h o r i t i e s  used t h e i r  s i t e  s e l e c t i o n  
and new sch oo l  c o n s t r u c t i o n  p o l i c i e s  i n t e n t i o n a l l y  
to  segregate black  c h i ld r e n  in the many schools  

constructed  between 1950 and 1975. The panel  he ld  
that "the D i s t r i c t  Judge was j u s t i f i e d  in r e ly in g  

in part  on the h i s t o r y  o f  the Columbus Board's  

s i t e  ch o i ce s  and c o n s t r u c t i o n  program in f in d in g

d e l i b e r a t e  and u n c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  systemwide se g r e g -
5 /a t i o n . " 583 F .2d  8 0 4 . — The s e g r e g a t i o n  o f

5/  The d i s t r i c t  court  descr ibed  in d e t a i l  the 
s i t e  l o c a t i o n  and e s t a b l i s h m e n t  o f  a t t e n d a n c e  
boundaries f o r  Gladstone (1965)  and Sixth Avenue 
(1961)  elementary schoo ls  in the area southwest



18

f a c u l t y  members in r a c i a l l y  i d e n t i f i a b l e  b lack  and 

white s c h o o l s  was a l s o  maintained i n t o  the 1970 s. 

583 F .2d 8 0 4 - 8 0 5 A s e r i e s  o f  s p e c i f i c  i n ­

stances  o f  gerrymandering, pup i l  attendance op­
t i o n s ,  and d iscon t igu ou s  pupil  assignment areas 
which operated to  segregate  b lack  students were 

a l s o  set  fo r th  in both op in ions below (583 F.2d

5/  contd .
o f  t h e  e a s t - c e n t r a l  b l a c k  community,  and f o r  
Cassady  and Innes  Road e l e m e n t a r y  s c h o o l s  in  
1975 in the north M i f f l i n  annexation area.  429 F. 
Supp. at 248-251. Other se g r e g a t iv e  c o n s t r u c t i o n  
occurred  at a l l  l e v e l s  in  and around the expanding 
b lack  community between 1950 and 1975, v i z . ,  the 
A r l in g to n  Park area to the nor th east ,  the mixed 
c e n t r a l  c i t y  area,  the Marion-Franklin Township 
area, another annexed area east  o f  Marion-Franklin  
T ow n sh ip ,  the  a r e a  n o r t h  o f  the c e n t r a l  b l a c k  
community and in the e a s t - c e n t r a l  area i t s e l f .  
See, Respondents'  B r i e f ,  No. 68-610, pp. 50-76.

6/  The teacher assignment p o l i c y  ended in  1974 
only a f t e r  independent adm in is tra t ive  proceedings 
b e f o r e  the Ohio C i v i l  Rights Commission resu l ted  
in r e a s s ig n m e n t  o f  f a c u l t y  t o  a p p r o x i m a t e  the 
systemwide r a c i a l  com pos it ion .  429 F.Supp. 238, 
259-260. The adm in is tra t ive  proceed in gs ,  however,  
d i d  n o t  c o n c e r n  d i s c r i m i n a t o r y  a d m i n i s t r a t i v e  
s t a f f  a s s ig n m e n t ,  which  c o n t i n u e d  u n abate d .  
Thus, in 1975-76, 73.3 percent o f  b lack  adminis­
t r a t o r s  were  a s s i g n e d  t o  s c h o o l s  w ith  7 0 -100  
p e r c e n t  b l a c k  s t u d e n t  b o d i e s .  429 F. Supp. at  
240.



19

at 8 05 -813 ) .—̂  The Court o f  Appeals found these 
a c t ion s  are " s i g n i f i c a n t  . . .  in  in d i c a t in g  that 

the Columbus Board 's  'neighborhood school  co n ce pt '  

was not app l ied  when a p p l i c a t i o n  o f  the neighbor ­

hood concept  would tend to  promote in t e g r a t i o n  
rather  than s e g r e g a t i o n . "  583 F.2d at 805. The 

f i n d i n g s  o f  m a n i p u l a t i o n  o f  t h e  n e i g h b o r h o o d  

sch o o l  concept  f o r  s egregat ive  purposes e f f e c ­
t i v e l y  des troys  the bo a r d ' s  c la im t o  n e u t r a l i t y  in 

i t s  conduct  s in c e  Brown.

7/  The c o u r t  b e l o w  d e s c r i b e d  in  d e t a i l  the 
se gregatory  use o f  gerrymandering and o p t io n a l  
attendance zones in vo lv in g  the Near-Bexley Option 
in  a sm a l l  w h i t e  e n c l a v e  e a s t  o f  Columbus'  
b lack  e a s t - c e n t r a l  core  area, and the Highland, 
West Mount and West Board Elementary Options. 429 
F. Supp. at 243-247, 271-274. Other such opt ions 
invo lved  the Downtown area,  Pi lgr im elementary, 
Frank lin -R ooseve l t  ju n i o r  h ighs ,  Central-North 
h igh  s c h o o l s  and E a s t - L i n d e n - M c K i n le y  h igh  
s c h o o l s .  See, Respondents'  B r i e f ,  No. 78-610,  pp. 
45-58 .

The cou r ts  below a l s o  d e t a i l e d  the segregatory  
use  o f  d i s c o n t i g u o u s  p u p i l  a ss ig n m e n t  zones 
in v o lv in g  Moler-Alum Crest elementary s c h o o l s ,  and 
H e i m a n d a l e - F o r n o f  e l e m e n t a r y  s c h o o l s .  429 F. 
Supp. at 247-248, 275. Other d iscont iguous  zoning 
i n v o l v e d  the  N e a r - B e x l e y  o p t i o n s ,  A r l i n g t o n  
Park-Eleventh Avenue-Leonard elementary s ch oo ls ,  
A r l in g to n  Park-Linmoor ju n io r  h ighs ,  Ar l in gton  
Park-M edina  j u n i o r  h i g h s  and, P i n e c r e s t - J o n e s  
Road-Barnett elementary s c h o o l s .  See, Respondents'  
B r i e f ,  No. 78-610,  pp. 50-68.



20

Judge Edwards' o p in ion  d u t i f u l l y  analyzed the 
f in d in g  o f  v i o l a t i o n  in Columbus in accordance 

w i th  the  Dayton I r e q u i r e m e n t  t h a t  the  i n c r e ­

mental s e g r e g a t iv e  e f f e c t  o f  such v i o l a t i o n s  be 

c o n s i d e r e d .  583 F .2d  at  814.  Judge Edwards 
d e s cr ibe d  f i v e  aspects  o f  the v i o l a t i o n  ( i n c l u d ­

in g  t h e  p r e - 1 9 5 4  c o n d u c t  d i s c u s s e d  a b o v e )  as 

n e c e s s a r i l y  systemwide in  t h e i r  impact:
( 1 )  The p r e - 1 9 5 4  e s t a b l i s h m e n t  o f  " f i v e  

sch oo ls  i n t e n t i o n a l l y  designed f o r  b lack  students 
and known as ' b l a c k '  s c h o o l s "  had a s y s t e m -  

wide e f f e c t ;
(2)  The pos t-1954  f a i l u r e  to desegregate  the 

system had systemwide impact;
( 3 )  The s c h o o l  c o n s t r u c t i o n  and s i t i n g  

p o l i c y  was systemwide in i t s  impact;
( 4 )  The s t u d e n t  ass ig n m en t  p o l i c y  which  

produced the large  m ajor i ty  o f  o n e - race  sch oo ls  

was he ld  to  be systemwide;
(5)  The segregated f a c u l t y  assignment p o l i c y  

a f f e c t e d  both b lack  and white  students systemwide 

and r a c i a l l y  i d e n t i f i e d  the s c h o o l s .
The panel  concluded with i t s  own ho ld ing  that 

6 , 6 0 0  pages  o f  the r e c o r d  s u p p o r t e d  a f i n d i n g  

t r a c k i n g  the  language  o f  Dayton I t h a t  the 
p o l i c i e s  and p r a c t i c e s  o f  seg reg at ion  had system 
wide a p p l i c a t i o n  and im p a c t .  583 F .2 d  at  814.



21

The d i s t r i c t  c o u r t  e x p r e s s l y  h e l d  t h a t  " [ t ] h e  

ev idence  in t h i s  case and the fa c t u a l  determina­
t i o n s  made e a r l i e r  in th is  op in ion  support the 

f in d in g  that  those elementary,  j u n i o r ,  and sen ior  
h i g h  s c h o o l s  in the  Columbus s c h o o l  d i s t r i c t  

which pre s e n t ly  have a predominantly b lack  student 

enrol lment have been s u b s t a n t i a l l y  and d i r e c t l y  
a f f e c t e d  by the i n t e n t i o n a l  a c t s  and omissions o f  

the  d e f e n d a n t  l o c a l  and s t a t e  b o a r d s . "  429 F. 

Supp. at 266. This f in d in g  applied to  1975-76 

s t a t i s t i c s ,  means that  65.5 percent o f  the black 

pu p i l s  in the Columbus p u b l i c  s ch o o l  d i s t r i c t  were
" s u b s t a n t i a l l y  and d i r e c t l y  a f f e c t e d "  by de jure

8/s e g r e g a t i o n . —

Dayton.
S i m i la r l y ,  Judge P h i l l i p s ,  w r i t in g  f o r  the 

panel  in the Dayton case s ,  thoroughly reviewed the 

record  o f  s ch o o l  a u t h o r i t i e s '  conduct s in ce  Brown 

and concluded that  there were su bs tan t ia l  p o s t -  

Brown v i o l a t i o n s .  583 F.2d at 253-257. The court  

found d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  in  f a c u l t y  a s s ig n m e n t s .  

Pre-Brown r a c i a l  f a c u l t y  assignment p o l i c i e s  were

8 /  6 5 . 6  p e r c e n t  o f  b l a c k  s t u d e n t s  a t t e n d e d  
sch oo ls  with 50 percent or  g reater  pup i l  e n r o l l ­
ment. See PI. Ex. 392. At the elementary l e v e l  
7 4 . 5  p e r c e n t  o f  b l a c k  s t u d e n t s  were a t t e n d i n g  
predominantly b la ck  s c h o o l s ,  56.8 percent at the 
ju n io r  high l e v e l  and 53.6 percent  at the high 
sch oo l  l e v e l .



22

maintained through 1969 and e f f e c t i v e l y  continued 

in p r a c t i c e  through 1970-1971. 583 F.2d at 253,

503 F .2d at 697-700. The board was s t i l l  opening 

new a l l - b l a c k  sch oo ls  with a l l - b l a c k  f a c u l t i e s  in 

the 1960 's ,  e . g . , McFarlane and the new Dunbar. 

583 F .2d at  2 5 3 - 2 5 4 .  The c o u r t  r e j e c t e d  the  

co n te n t io n  that the r a c i a l  imbalance was adven­

t i t i o u s ,  po in t in g  out that o p t i o n a l  attendance

zones were used in  the 1970 's f o r  r a c i a l l y  s e g r e -
9/

g a t i v e  p u r p o s e s .  583 F .2 d  at  255 .  The c o u r t  
a l s o  made f in d in gs  that schoo l  c o n s t r u c t i o n  and 

s i t e  s e l e c t i o n  d e c i s i o n s  as w e l l  as grade s t r u c ­
ture  and re o r g a n iz a t i o n  d e c i s i o n s  had c o n t r ib u t e d  

a f f i r m a t i v e l y  t o  the co n t in u a t io n  o f  the se g r e g a t ­

ed sys tem  s e t  up p r i o r  t o  1954.  583 F .2 d  at
2 5 6 - 2 5 7 .  The p o l i c y  o f  r e p l a c i n g  i n n e r  c i t y  

schoo ls  with sometimes i r r e g u l a r l y  s i z e d  sch o o ls  

in  the  same a t t e n d a n c e  zones  and b u i l d i n g  new 

sch oo ls  at the p e r ip h e r i e s  o f  the expanding Dayton 

community fa r  from inner c i t y  areas r e su l t e d  in 22

9/ See, e . g . , o p t i o n a l  attendance zones i n v o l v ­
ing Dunbar, Pat terson  Coop, Colone l  White-Riser ,  
R ooseve l t -Fa irv iew  and White, Residence Park-Adams, 
W e s t w o o d -G a r d e n d a le ,  J e f f e r s o n - B r o w n  and J e f -  
f e r s o n - C o r n e l 1 H e i g h t s .  503 F .2d  at 6 9 5 - 6 9 6 ,  
Respondents'  B r i e f  No. 78-627,  pp. 44-51 .



-  23

o f  24 new s c h o o l s  and 78 o f  86 a dd i t io n s  that were 

90 percent o r  more black or  whi te .  583 F.2d at 

255.  The s c h o o l  b o a r d ' s  r e o r g a n i z a t i o n  o f  20 
elementary sch oo ls  in t o  a middle sch oo l  system in 

1971-72, as the Ohio State Department o f  Education 

put i t ,  added "one more a c t i o n  to a long  l i s t  o f  

s t a t e  imposed a c t i v i t i e s  which are o f f e n s i v e  to  

the C o n s t i t u t i o n  and which are degrading to  school  

c h i l d r e n . "  583 F.2d at 256, 503 F.2d at 702 . — ''  

F i n a l l y ,  the panel  cons idered  the incremental  

se g r e g a t iv e  e f f e c t  o f  what i t  c a l l e d  the "d e fe n ­
d a n t s 1 most e g r e g i o u s  p r a c t i c e s . "  583 F .2d 

at 258. Like the panel in the Columbus case ,  i t  
found that  pre -Brown segregat ion  M,a f f e c t [ e d ]  a 

su b s t a n t ia l  p o r t i o n  o f  the s c h o o l s ,  teachers and 

f a c i l i t i e s '  o f  the  Dayton s c h o o l s  and,  thus 

c l e a r l y  had systemwide im pact . "  583 F.2d at 258. 
The court  a l s o  said that  p o s t -Brown acts  " p e r p e t ­
uated and increased  p u b l i c  sch oo l  se g re g at io n  in

10/  Although the Court o f  Appeals did  not f in d  i t  
n e c e s s a r y  to  r e l y  on such p r o o f  in  i t s  l a s t  
o p i n i o n ,  the  Dayton s c h o o l  bo a r d  a l s o  pursued  
se g r e g a t iv e  t r a n s f e r  and t ra n sp o r t a t io n  p o l i c i e s .  
503 F.2d at 703; Respondents'  B r i e f ,  No. 78-627, 
pp. 53-59.



-  24

Dayton."  583 F.2d at 258.
These s o l i d  f ind ings  o f  p o s t -Brown d i s c r i m i ­

nat ion  r e i n f o r c e  the c o n c lu s io n  that the Dayton 

and Columbus b o a r d s  have  not  o n l y  f a i l e d  t o  

f u l f i l l  th e i r  o b l i g a t i o n s  to  dismantle the dual 

systems they create d  p r i o r  to  Brown, but a f f i r m a ­

t i v e l y  c o n t r i b u t e d  t o  the s e g r e g a t i o n  e x t a n t  

today.  The depth and d e t a i l  o f  the f in d in gs  is 

impress ive .  The co n c lu s io n s  o f  se g r e g a t iv e  in tent  

are based upon o b j e c t i v e  f a c t s  in the records  and 

should be a f f i rm ed.

I I .  The Sixth C i r c u i t  Has Properly Applied the
E q u i t a b l e  P r i n c i p l e  That A Remedy Must Be 
Reasonably Related To The V i o l a t i o n

A. The Dayton I Requirement Of Findings Of 
Incremental  Segregat ive E f f e c t  Should 
E i t h e r  Be I n t e r p r e t e d  In  Harmony 
With Keyes, As The Sixth C i r c u i t  Read 
I t ,  Or I t  Should Be Overruled.

11/ In 1971-72, the year the a c t i o n  was f i l e d ,  
the Dayton schoo l  d i s t r i c t  had 54,000 students ,  
42.7 percent o f  whom were b lack .  There were 69 
s c h o o l s ;  49 had student enrol lments 90 percent or 
more o f  one r a c e  (21 b l a c k ,  28 w h i t e ) ,  7 5 .9  
p e r c e n t  o f  b l a c k  s t u d e n t s  b e i n g  a s s i g n e d  t o  
the 21 black  sc h o o l s .  503 F.2d at 694-695, 583 
F . 2d at 254.



25

Both panels o f  the Sixth C i r c u i t  read t h i s  

C o u r t ' s  Dayton I o p in ion  as re a f f i rm in g  the Keyes 

h o l d i n g  t h a t  where s e g r e g a t i o n  p o l i c i e s  had a 
systemwide impact systemwide r e l i e f  i s  required .  

Both co u r ts  deemed that i t  was compliance with 

Dayton I to  determine that the i d e n t i f i e d  segrega­

t i v e  p o l i c i e s  o f  the two sc h o o l  board were not 
i s o l a t e d  or  l im i ted  to  i n s u b s t a n t ia l  fragments o f  

the systems, but were inste ad  systemwide in  t h e i r  

a p p l i c a t i o n .  Both panels acknowledge the Dayton I 

lan gu ag e  which  c a l l e d  f o r  f i n d i n g s  abou t the  
" increm ental  s e g r e g a t iv e  e f f e c t "  o f  the v i o l a t i o n s  
and a comparison o f  the present r a c i a l  d i s t r i b u ­

t i o n  o f  the pu p i l s  with "what i t  would have been 

in the absence o f  such c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  v i o l a t i o n s . "  
(583  F .2d  at  2 5 7 ;  583 F .2 d  at  8 1 3 ) .  However,  
n e i th e r  o p in ion  deemed i t  necessary t o  embark on a 

h igh ly  s u p p o s i t i t i o u s  and h y p o t h e t i c a l  r e c o n s t r u c ­

t i o n  o f  where the pup il s  might be i f  the pervas ive  
se g re g at io n  p o l i c i e s  had never been implemented. 
Where se g r e g a t io n  i s  i s o l a t e d ,  as f o r  example by a 

recent  gerrymander that  a f f e c t s  a few s c h o o l s  and 

p u p i l s ,  one might r e a s o n a b l y  a t tem p t  such a 

r e c o n s t r u c t i o n ,  and reach a c o n c lu s io n  to l im i t  

the remedy to  a few s c h o o l s .  But where, as in 
these cases ,  so many asp ects  o f  the segregat ion



26

p o l i c y  were o f  long standing and were systemwide 

in  t h e i r  e f f e c t s  t h e r e  can  be no m e a n i n g f u l  

r e c o n s t r u c t i o n  o f  what m ight h a v e  o c c u r r e d .  

This Court cou ld  not have intended to  so burden 
the process  o f  desegregat ion .

Dunbar High School  in Dayton i l l u s t r a t e s  the 
d i f f i c u l t y  with such a reading o f  Dayton I . As we 

have d e s cr ibe d  above, Dunbar was e s t a b l i s h e d  as a 

c i tyw ide  high schoo l  f o r  b la cks ,  with an a l l - b l a c k  

f a c u l t y ,  and a p o l i c y  f o r b i d i n g  b lacks  to  teach 

whites .  I t  was named f o r  a well-known black  poet .  

B la c k s  were e i t h e r  a u t o m a t i c a l l y  a s s i g n e d  t o  

Dunbar or  induced to  attend by o ther  means i n c lu d ­

ing the d iscourag ing  e f f e c t s  o f  se g r e g a t iv e  and 
d is c r im in a to r y  treatment in the white  s c h o o l s .  
W hites  were e x c l u d e d  from Dunbar by the  o v e r t  

f a c u l t y  p o l i c y .  It  is  d i f f i c u l t  to  imagine how 
the attendance pat tern  o f  a l l  o f  Dayton's  high 

schoo ls  might have deve loped  i f  Dunbar had never 

been e s t a b l i sh e d  and maintained as the c i tywide  

sch oo l  f o r  b lacks  o n ly ,  or  i f  i t  had ever been 
desegregated a f t e r  be ing  e s t a b l i s h e d  as a one -race  

s c h o o l .  No witness cou ld  t e s t i f y  with any c e r ­

t a in t y  whether black  c i t i z e n s  would have l o c a t e d  
t h e i r  homes near  o t h e r  h igh  s c h o o l s  i f  t h e i r



-  27

c h i ld r e n  had been welcomed there or  that whites  

would have l i v e d  near Dunbar i f  i t  had been an 

i n te g r a te d  school  from the beginning .  Segregated 

sch o o ls  were an i n t e g r a l  part o f  the g h e t t o i z a t i o n  

o f  b l a c k s .  Who can know t o  what e x t e n t  the 
ghet tos  o f  Dayton and Columbus would be d i f f e r e n t ,  

i f  the schoo ls  had been operated on a n o n - d i s -  

c r i m i n a t o r y  b a s i s ,  and had tau g h t  a l e s s o n  o f  

n o n - d i s c r i m i n a t i o n  and e q u a l i t y  i n s t e a d  o f  a 

l e sson  o f  white  supremacy.

I f  the Dayton I h o ld in g  does l im i t  the r igh t  

to a d e s e g r e g a t e d  e d u c a t i o n  to  s c h o o l s  which 

p l a i n t i f f s  can prove would have been in tegrated  

absent s p e c i f i c  d i s c r im in a t o r y  conduct ,  i t  would 

r e s u r r e c t  the s c h o o l - b y - s c h o o l  f r a c t i o n a t i n g  o f  
these cases which the m a jo r i ty  r e j e c t e d  in Keyes, 

o v e r  d i s s e n t s  by Mr. J u s t i c e  P o w e l l  and Mr. 
J u s t i c e  Rehnquist.  In grant ing  a stay  in  Colum­

bus , Mr. J u s t i c e  Rhenquist in d ica te d  a view that  
the Sixth C i r c u i t  was m is in t e r p r e t in g  the C ourt ' s  

Dayton I mandate. Columbus, Board o f  Education v . 

P e n i c k , 58 L Ed 2d 55 ( J u s t i c e  R e h n q u is t  i n  

chambers) . I f  that view i s  c o r r e c t  (and we urge 
above that  i t  is n o t )  then we b e l i e v e  that the 

Dayton I r e q u i r e m e n t  s h o u l d  be o v e r r u l e d .  I f
p l a i n t i f f s  have the burden o f  prov ing a bas is  f o r



28

desegregat ion  s c h o o l —by—s c h o o l ,  o r  o f  c a l c u l a t i n g  

the p r e c i s e  numbers o f  pu p i l s  a f f e c t e d  by each 

s e g r e g a t i o n i s t  a c t ,  the Dayton I r u le  w i l l  impose 

a p r a c t i c a l  b a r r i e r  t o  any meaningful  r e l i e f  even 

i f  the c a s e  o f  e g r e g i o u s  o v e r t  s e g r e g a t i o n  

such as at Dunbar High.
We ask the  C ourt  t o  ad h e r e  t o  the  e x p r e s s  

h o l d i n g  o f  Keyes t h a t  p l a i n t i f f s  i n  a s c h o o l  

desegregat ion  case should not "bear the burden o f  

proving the elements o f  de_ jure se g re g at io n  as to 
each and every sch oo l  or  each and every student 

with in  the schoo l  system,"  and that a system­

a t i c  program o f  s e g r e g a t io n  a f f e c t i n g  a substan­

t i a l  p o r t i o n  o f  the studen ts ,  s c h o o l s ,  teachers 

and f a c i l i t i e s "  was a proper p r e d ic a t e  f o r  f i n d ­

ing that  a system was a dual system. 413 U.S. at 

2 0 0 - 2 0 1 .  Th is  was the C o u r t ' s  "common s e n s e "  

c o n c l u s i o n  c o n s i d e r i n g  the  r e c i p r o c a l  e f f e c t  

that  a p o l i c y  o f  keeping some sch o o ls  b lack  has in 
keeping o th er  s c h o o l s  white ,  and the e f f e c t  that 

earmarking c e r t a i n  schoo ls  as b la ck  would have on 

the r a c i a l  compos it ion  o f  the neighborhoods in  the 

m etropo l i tan  area.  413 U.S. 202-203. This h o ld in g  

o f  Keyes seemed to  have been c l e a r  at the time to  
the  members o f  the Court  who d i s s e n t e d .  The 
d i s s e n t in g  o p in ion  o f  M r .Justi ce  Powell o b je c t e d  

to a systemwide remedy in  part  because although



-  29

the s ch o o l  board was " l e g a l l y  r e sp o n s ib le  f o r  some 

o f  the se g re g at io n  that e x i s t s , "  he b e l i e v e d  that  
i f  they had proper ly  d ischarged  t h e i r  " c o n s t i ­
t u t i o n a l  du ty  . . .  o v e r  the pas t  d e c a d e s ,  the  

fundamental problem o f  r e s i d e n t i a l  segregat ion  

would  p e r s i s t . "  413 U.S .  at  249 .  Mr. J u s t i c e  

Rehnquist d i s s e n t e d ,  o b j e c t i n g  t o  the a p p l i c a t i o n  

o f  the Green d e c i s i o n ' s  a f f i r m a t iv e  desegregative  

d u t i e s  to  Denver, and r e l i e f  that might requ ire  

t h a t  " p u p i l s  be t r a n s p o r t e d  g r e a t  d i s t a n c e s  
throughout the d i s t r i c t  to and from sch oo ls  whose 

attendance zones have not been gerrymandered." 423 

U.S. at 257. The m a jo r i ty  r e j e c t e d  th is  argument 

with a r e a f f i r m a t io n  o f  Green. Keyes, supra, 413 
U.S. at 200-201, note  11.

I t  i s  t h i s  c e n t r a l  h o l d i n g  o f  Keyes th at  
p e t i t i o n e r s  seek t o  reverse  through t h e i r  reading 

o f  Dayton I . We b e l i e v e ,  however, that  the Keyes 
h o l d i n g  abou t  the i n t e r r e l a t i o n s h i p  be tw een  

s e g r e g a t i v e  p r a c t i c e s  among s c h o o l s  w i t h i n  a 
system i s  as v a l i d  today as when Keyes was decided 

s i x  years ago. The contrary  ru le  that  p l a i n t i f f s  
in a sch oo l  desegregat ion  case should have the 

burden  o f  s c h o o 1- b y - s c h o o 1 j u s t i f i c a t i o n  o f  a 
d e s e g r e g a t i o n  remedy i s  as i n v a l i d  t o d a y  as 
when r e j e c t e d  in Keyes.



30

Where the sch oo l  d i s t r i c t  has been shown to  

have engaged in a se g r e g a t io n  p o l i c y  which has had 

su bs tan t ia l  impact, the same " [ c ] o n s i d e r a t i o n s  o f  

' f a i r n e s s '  and ' p o l i c y ' "  ( Keyes, supra , 413 U.S. 

at 214) which led to the Keyes h o ld in g  as to  the 

a l l o c a t i o n  o f  the burden o f  p r o o f  s t i l l  apply.  

Nothing has changed s in c e  1973 which r e qu ire s  th is  

Court  t o  adopt new p r o c e d u r e s  and r e m ed ies  

f o r  the d isestab l ishment o f  northern p u b l i c  schoo l  

s e g r e g a t io n .  The l e s s o n  o f  over two decades o f  

s c h o o l  d e s e g e g a t i o n  j u r i s p r u d e n c e  i s  t h a t  the  

substant ive  r i g h t  to  equal  educat ional  opportu nity  

is  governed by the law o f  procedure and remedy. 
We t h e r e f o r e  r e s p e c t f u l l y  submit that these cases 

present the Court with no l e s s  an i ssue  than the 
f u t u r e  o f  s c h o o l  d e s e g r e g a t i o n  in  the N o r t h :  

" [ t ] o  take away a l l  remedy f o r  the enforcement of  

a r i g h t  i s  to  take away the r ig h t  i t s e l f . "  Poindex­

ter  v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270, 303.
We urge the Court to  a f f i r m  the ru le  o f  Green 

and Swann t h a t  any s c h o o l  d i s t r i c t  which  has 

v i o l a t e d  the c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  r i g h t s  o f  i t s  black 

s t u d e n t s  must u n d e r t a k e  the  maximum f e a s i b l e  

amount of  desegregat ion .  Their duty i s  to "make 
e v e r y  e f f o r t  to  a c h i e v e  the  g r e a t e s t  p o s s i b l e



31

d e g r e e  o f  a c t u a l  d e s e g r e g a t i o n ,  t a k i n g  i n t o  

account the p r a c t i c a l i t i e s  o f  the s i t u a t i o n "  and 

co n s id e r in g  the use o f  " a l l  a v a i la b l e  techniques 
in c lu d in g  the r e s t r u c t u r in g  o f  attendance zones 
and both contiguous and noncontiguous attendance 

z o n e s . "  Davis v.  School  Commissioners o f  Mobile 
County, 402 U.S. 33, 37; see Swann, supra, 402

U.S .  at  2 2 - 3 1 .  That r u l e  would be e n t i r e l y  
crushed and thwarted in  most o f  the Nation by a 

d o c t r i n e  which co n s id e rs  the process  o f  desegrega­
t i o n  as a necessary e v i l  to be app l ied grudgingly  

and s p a r i n g l y  as i f  w i th  a " m i c r o m e t e r "  —  t o  

r e p e a t  Judge W e i n s t e i n ' s  c h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n .

B. These  Cases W i l l  Determine The Fu tu re  Of 
School  Desegregation In The North.

In a February 1979 survey the United States 
Commission on C i v i l  Rights found "that  the a d j u s t ­

ment o f  p a r e n t s  and s t u d e n t s  t o  d e s e g r e g a t i o n  
continues  and the p r e d i c t i o n s  o f  se r ious  r a c i a l

c o n f l i c t  and a d e t e r i o r a t i n g  q u a l i t y  o f  educat ion
12/have proved g r o u n d l e s s . " —  The Commission found 

that  sch oo l  dese gre g at io n "  not only continues to

12/ U. S. Comm, on C i v i l  Rights ,  DESEGREGATION OF 
THE NATION'S PUBLIC SCHOOLS: A STATUS REPORT, i i  
(Feb. 1979).



32

be a c o n s t i t u t i o n a l  r e q u i r e m e n t  but  a v i t a l  

n a t ion a l  goal  that  we b e l i e v e  i s  broad ly  supported 

by the American p e o p l e . "  I d . at i i i .  The Commis­
s ion  found that  i n t e g r a t i o n  was a su ccess  in many 

communities,  in c lu d in g  notab ly  Char lo tte-Mecklen 

burg, North C aro l in a ,  and Denver, Colorado ,  the 

communities invo lved  in  Swann and Keyes. Ld. at 

34-35, 40-41 ,  72. This C o u rt ' s  l ea d e r sh ip  has had 

a sa lu tary  e f f e c t  in many communities.  Without 

such continued le ade rsh ip ,  however, the future 

o f  in t e g r a t i o n  in the North would be bl eak .  The 
Commission a l s o  found that  in some d i s t r i c t s  and 

r e g io n s — notably the Northeast  and North Central  
r e g io n s — se g re g at io n  remains at d i s c o u r a g in g ly  

high l e v e l s .  I d . at i i ,  20.
The s p e c t e r  o f  e n d l e s s  s e g r e g a t i o n  o f  t h e  

races  in  the p u b l i c  schoo ls  o f  the North haunts 
t h e s e  c a s e s .  The a d o p t i o n  o f  p e t i t i o n e r s '  

p o s i t i o n  would remove the l i g h t  o f  hope f o r  an 

in tegra ted  s o c i e t y  at the end o f  the tunnel ,  and 

w i th  i t  the  e s s e n t i a l  t r u s t  and c o n f i d e n c e  
between the races on which our n a t i o n a l  s t a b i l i t y  

and progress depend.
T h is  Court  m ight have c h o s e n  one o r  more 

d i r e c t  r o u t e s  t o  d e s e g r e g a t i o n  o f  the  p u b l i c  

sch oo ls  o f  the North rather  than the l a b y r i n t h i c  

"de ju r e "  in qu iry .  The Court might have found



33 -

s t a t e - i n d u c e d  and supported housing  se g re g at io n
patterns s u f f i c i e n t  ground f o r  i n v a l i d a t i n g  and

13/remedying the concomitant sch oo l  s e g r e g a t i o n . —  Or
the Court might have he ld  that  schoo l  a u t h o r i t i e s

must advance a t ru ly  com pel l ing  i n t e r e s t  be fore

p e r p e t u a t i n g  by s t u d e n t  ass ig n m en t  th e  r a c i a l
14/i s o l a t i o n  o f  our urban r e s i d e n t i a l  p a t t e r n s . —  

F i n a l l y ,  t h i s  Court under the broad p r o t e c t i v e  

p r o v i s i o n s  o f  the  T h i r t e e n t h  and F o u r t e e n t h  
Amendments might have i n v a l id a t e d  and provided 

r e m e d ie s  f o r  d_e f a c t o  s c h o o l  s e g r e g a t i o n . - ^ - ^  
These are routes  which would promise n a t io n ­

wide s ch o o l  desegregat ion  rather than a continuing  
double standard between North and South pred icate d  

on p a s t  de_ j u r e  c o n d u c t .  But t h i s  Court  has 
instead r e l i e d  in Keyes upon the narrower route 

f o r  Northern sch o o l  desegreg at ion  through f ind ings  
o f  schoo l  board d i s c r im in ato ry  inte nt and presump­

ti on s  based thereon.  Now p e t i t i o n e r s  would render

13/ C f . ,  M i l l ik e n  v.  B rad ley , 418 U.S. 717, 755 
(1974)  (Stewart ,  J. c o n c u r r in g ) .

14/ Si lard ,  Toward Nationwide School  Desegrega-  
t i o n :  A "Compell ing State I n t e r e s t "  Test o f  Rac ia l  
Concentrat ion  in  Pu bl ic  Education, 51 N. Car. L. 
Rev. 675 (1973)  (passim).

15/  Wright,  Publ ic  School Desegregation :  Legal 
Remedies f o r  De Facto Segregat ion ,  40 N.Y.U.L. 
Rev. 285 (1965 ) .



34 -

Keyes meaningless and unworkable and thus make 

permanent the  p a t t e r n  o f  s e g r e g a t e d  p u b l i c  

s c h o o l s  i n  the North .  Those  who have  d e v o t e d  

t h e i r  l i v e s  t o  l a bo r in g  in  the vineyards f o r  an 

in tegra ted  s o c i e t y  b e l i e v e  they have earned the 

r i g h t  to  speak p l a i n l y :  I f  th is  Court were to 

accept  p e t i t i o n e r s  1 p o s i t i o n ,  segregated  sch oo ls  

(and as a consequence a more segregated  s o c i e t y )  

w i l l  be the legacy  o f  the Court,  ju s t  as sure ly  as 

a segregated s o c i e t y  was the legacy  o f  the Court 

that dec ided the C i v i l  Rights Cases,  109 U.S. 3

and Plessy  v.  Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537.



35 -

CONCLUSION

I t  i s  r e s p e c t f u l l y  submitted that the judg­

ments o f  the  U nited  S t a t e s  Court  o f  A ppea ls  
f o r  the Sixth C i r c u i t  in these cases should be 

a f  f  i  rme d .

R e s p e c t f u l l y  submitted,

JACK GREENBERG 
JAMES M. NABRIT, I I I  
BILL LANN LEE

Suite  2030
10 Columbus C i r c l e
New York, New York 10019

JOSEPH L. RAUH, JR.
JOHN SILARD
ELLIOT C. LICHTMAN

Rauh, Si lard and Lichtman 
1001 Connect icut  Avenue, N.W. 
8000 East J e f f e r s o n  Avenue 
D e t r o i t ,  Michigan 48214

JOHN FILLION
United Auto Workers
8000 East J e f f e r s o n  Avenue
D e t r o i t ,  Michigan 48214

Attorneys f o r  Amici Curiae



MEILEN PRESS INC — N. Y, C. «®s<> 219

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top