Correspondence from Pamela Karlan to Gilbert Ganucheau (Clerk) Re: Chisom v. Edwards
Public Court Documents
July 9, 1987

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 3. High Court to Decide Case of Rights Leader Convicted of Blocking Birmingham Sidewalk, 1965. 7d67183b-b692-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/8804d06b-e817-4661-8f13-e2467dc93c09/high-court-to-decide-case-of-rights-leader-convicted-of-blocking-birmingham-sidewalk. Accessed June 01, 2025.
Copied!
10 Columbus Circle New York, N.Y. 10019 JUdson 6-8397 NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund PRESS RELEASE President a Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers a bes oe og > Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg August 25, 1965 HIGH COURT TO DECIDE CASE OF RIGHTS LEADER CONVICTED OF BLOCKING BIRMINGHAM SIDEWALK Legal Defense Fund Acts in Behalf of the Rev. Fred L. Shuttlesworth WASHINGTON, D, C.--The U.S. Supreme Court this fall will consider the appeal of the Rev. Fred L, Shuttlesworth, Birmingham, Ala., civil rights leader, who was convicted in 1962 of obstructing a sidewalk and failure to obey the order of a policeman, Jack Green- berg, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund director-counsel, announced today. A team of Legal Defense Fund lawyers headed by James M, Nabrit III, is scheduled to argue the case Oct. 11, Mr, Greenberg said: Rev. Shuttlesworth, a well-known member of Dr. Martin Luther King's Southern Christian Leadership Conference, was convicted » under a Birmingham ordinance which makes it unlawful to "stand, loiter or walk upon any street or sidewalk in the City so as to® obstruct free passage over, on or along said street or sidewalk." Another Birmingham ordinance makes it illegal to "stand or loiter after having been requested by any police officer to move on." The minister Fund in severai S imprisonment at hea of fines and costs. o has been represented by the Legal Defense ne Court cases, was sentenced to 180 days labor plus 61 days imprisonment in default Rev, Shuttlesworth was arrested during a boycott of downtown Birmingham merchants, but testimony intended to show that the prosecution was racial harrassment was excluded in the court which convicted him. According to Birmingham police, Rev. Shuttlesworth and several other persons were standing on a street corner engaged in conversation when a policeman who had been observing them ordered them to move. The civil rights leader was arrested as he questioned the officer as to why they could not stand on the side- walk, Rey, Shuttlesworth contends that he and a group of friends were walking along the sidewalk, and paused for a traffic light at a corner, He said a policeman accusted him and told him to move on, but positioned himself directly in front of him so he could not go forward, The minister said that when he attempted to proceed by enterinu a nearby department store, the officer followed him and arrested hu, Rev. Shuttlesworth was convicted and sentenced in Birmingham Recorder's Court. Subsequent appeals to the Alabama appellate courts were unsuccessful. The Legal Defense Fund brief maintains that Birmingham's ordinance against “standing and loitering" is unconstitutional be- cause it is “vague and overbroad." The appeal also contends that the conviction for refusal to obey the lawful orders*of a policeman should be set aside because Alabama courts have construed the ordinance to apply only to orders of policemen relating to vehicular traffic, — EGOS Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Riverside 9-8487 Be