Memphis State College 'Gradual' Plan to Federal Court

Press Release
February 10, 1956

Cite this item
Memphis State College 'Gradual' Plan to Federal Court preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Loose Pages. Memphis State College 'Gradual' Plan to Federal Court, 1956. ab4b3051-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3596a7cb-2dfb-4fa2-8c59-48185c969d4d/memphis-state-college-gradual-plan-to-federal-court. Accessed October 08, 2025.

    Copied!

    PRESS RELEASE® e 

NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND 
107 WEST 43 STREET * NEW YORK 36, N. Y. + JUdson 6-8397 

THURGOOD MARSHALL 

sia ae pif Poss ba Cosa 
ROY WILKINS Assistant Counsel 
Secretary 

ALLAN KNIGHT CHALMERS poe MILLE 
Treasurer MEMPHIS STATE COLLEGE ; 

'GRADUAL' PLAN TO FEDERAL COURT February 10, 1956 

ROBERT L. CARTER 

CINCINNATI, 0., Feb. 9--The stalling tactics to delay the admission 

of Negro students to Memphis State College reached the federal appeals 

court here today. 

In a brief filed with the U. S, Court of Appeals seeking the imme- 

diate admission of 5 Negro students to the state-supported college, 

lawyers for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. attacked 

a decision of the district court judge approving a gradual desegregation 

plan for the college. 

The plan provides for the mixing of classes beginning in 1955-56 

at the graduate level and ending in 1959-60 with the opening of fresh- 

man classes, 

College officials had argued that a policy of "unbridled" admission 

of Negroes "would overtax" the facilities, Attorneys for the Negro stu- 

dents, however, drew an admission from the school officials tmt 143 

out-of-state white students and 1,079 non-residents of Memphis are now 

enrolled in the college. 

The district court judge held that the college was "proceeding with 

all deliberate speed" to comply with the U. S. Supreme Court decision in 

the school segregation cases. The time provided by the gradual plan is 

“absolutely necessary" to "orderly and peacefully" integrate the school, 

the court ruled. 

Legal Defense lawyers contend that the district court judge abused 

his discretion in approving the college's plan, 

The decision of the district court judge, in approving the gradual 

plan, means that a Negro'seeking equal educational opportunities at the 

higher educational level is now in a more adverse position since the 

decision in the school segregation cases than he was when the "separate 

but equal! doctrine was in effect," the lawyers conclude. 

NAACP Legal Defense attorneys for the students are Thurgood Marshall, 

director-counsel, Robert L. Carter, assistant counsel, both of New York, 

and H, T. Lockard of Memphis. Assisting are J. F. Estes, B, L. Hooks 

and A, W, Willis, Jr. of Memphis and Z. Alexander Looby of Nashville. 

-30-

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.