Rogers v Loether Writ of Certiorari

Public Court Documents
October 1, 1972

Cite this item
Rogers v Loether Writ of Certiorari preview

68 pages

Cite this item

  • Brief Collection, LDF Court Filings. Rogers v Lodge Motion for Leave to File Brief Amicus Curiae, 1981. b59aea30-c39a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/f76d3687-83a8-4e82-a52a-8f6e62b4ea7a/rogers-v-lodge-motion-for-leave-to-file-brief-amicus-curiae. Accessed April 22, 2025.

    Copied!

    No. 80-2100

I n  th e

(Emtrt of tty Mnit^
O ctober T erm , 1981 

Q u en tin  R ogers, et al.,
Appellants,

versus

H erman  L odge, et al.

ON A P PE A R  FROM  T H E  U N IT E D  STATES 

COURT OF A PPEALS FOR T H E  F IF T H  C IR C U IT

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF 
AMICI CURIAE OF 

THE N.A.A.C.P. LEGAL DEFENSE 
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC.

AND THE CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS 
IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES

J ack  G reenberg 
J ames M. N abrit, III  
L ow ell  J ohnston  
N apoleon B. W illiam s  
L an i G u in ie r  

Suite 2030 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019

Counsel for Amici

December 1981



No. 80-2100

IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER TERM, 1981

QUENTIN ROGERS, et al.,
Appellants ,

versus
HERMAN LODGE, et al.

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES 
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AMICI CURIAE OF THE N.A.A.C.P. LEGAL DEFENSE 
AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC., AND THE 
CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS IN SUPPORT 
OF APPELLEES.

Pursuant 
Legal Defense

to Rule 36, the N.A.A.C.P. 
and Educational Fund, Inc.,

and the Congressional Black Caucus request



2

leave to file a Brief Amici Curiae in the 
instant appeal. Amici are organizations 
dedicated to protection of the right to 
vote of minorities, especially Black Ameri­
cans, in this country.

Appellees have consented to the re­
quest. Appellants have not.

Amici assert in their brief that this 
Court should decide in this appeal no more 
than that Appellees have submitted suffi­
cient evidence to sustain their burden of 
proof and persuasion. Amici also argue 
that the decision herein should be based 
on evidentiary principles universally ap­
plied in the federal courts. These argu­
ments, as developed in the Brief Amici 
Curiae, have not been presented by the 
parties. Yet, they are critical for
proper disposition of this appeal. For



3

these reasons, Amici Curiae request leave 
to file the brief.

Respectfully submitted,

JACK GREENBERG 
JAMES M. NABRIT, III 
LOWELL JOHNSTON 
NAPOLEON B. WILLIAMS, JR. 
LANI GUINIER 

Suite 2030 
10 Columbus Circle 
New York, New York 10019 
(212) 586-8397

Counsel for Amici In Support 
of Appellants



MESLEN PRESS INC. —  N. V. C. .<23>- 2)9

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top