Notice of Service of Response to Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents

Smith v Allwright Brief of Appellant preview

96 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Date is approximate.

Topic
- Political Participation
- Voting Rights Act
Notable Person
- Thurgood Marshall
Organization
- NAACP Legal and Educational Defense Fund, Inc.
Collection
- Brief Collection
Taxonomy
Identifier
- 682475bb-c49a-ee11-be37-00224827e97b

Cite this item

Case Files, Sheff v. O'Neill Hardbacks. Notice of Service of Response to Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents, 1990. 1bb7fd1b-a346-f011-877a-002248226c06. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/9557620c-0732-497e-b1b1-a5c85795d633/notice-of-service-of-response-to-plaintiffs-second-request-for-production-of-documents. Accessed August 19, 2025.

Copied!

    PN 
HP® 7 

¥   nN fe a oo 

CV 89-0360977S 
: Nl fT oF J 

MILO SHEFF, et al mT SUPERIOR COURT 
Toeecewwe J.D. HARTFORD/NEW 

Plaintiffs NEW BRITAIN AT HARTFORD     
Vv. 

WILLIAM A. O'NEILL, 

Defendants 

NOTICE OF SERVICE OF RESPONSE TO 

PLAINTIFFS' SECOND REQUEST FOR 
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS 

  

  

  

The defendants hereby give notice that they have responded 

to the Plaintiffs' Second Request for Production of Documents in 

the following way: 

1. Copies of the requested documents were produced in response 

to. requests 2, 3, 4, 5,6, 72, .8,.9, 10,13, 2, 13, 14, 15, 16, 

Y7,. 21, 22, 23, 24, 27. and 28. 

2. Documents were made available for inspection in response to 

request 10. 

3. Documents were previously provided to plaintiffs in response 

to requests 18, 19 and 20.      



  

  
4. No documents could be located in response to requests 1, 

and 26. 

  

25 

  
5. A partial objection was interposed in response to request 25. 

By: 

FOR THE DEFENDANTS 

CLARINE NARDI RIDDLE 

ATTORNEY GENERAL 
A 

/ ’ A / 
” / / / rd /, / p/ 

i/ ats / - / 
wy LLL / Fw { Li” 
  
John R. Whelan 
Assistant Attorney General 
110 Sherman Street 
Hartford, Connecticut 06105 
Telephone: 566-3696 

 



  

    

  
  

  

CERTIFICATION 
  

This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing was mailed, 

a 

postage prepaid on rl iL +1990 to the followiing 
by nad & 

counsel or record: / 

John Brittain 

University of Connecticut 
School of Law 

65 Elizabeth Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Wilfred Rodriguez 
Hispanic Advocacy Project 
Neighborhood Legal Services 
1229 Albany Avenue 
Hartford, Cr. 06112 

Philip Tegeler 
Martha Stone 

Connecticut Civil Liberties Union 

32 Grand Street 

Hartford, CT 06106 

Wesley W. Horton 
Mollier, Horton & Fineberg, P.C. 
90 Gillett Street 
Hartford, CT 06105 

Julius L. Chambers 
John Charles Boger 
NAACP Legal Defense Fund and 
Educational Fund, Inc. 
99 Hudson Street 
New York, NY 10013 

John A. Powell 

Helen Hershkoff 

American Civil Liberties Union 

  

 



  

    

} 

{ 

il 

ii 

LH | 

I) 

    

  

132 West 43rd Street 

New York, NY 10036 

tf a CE Sy Si 
Vlg / fff 
A 1 / A Z / hl 7 7 
11. el 

  

Joh# R. Whelan 
Assistant Attorney General

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Smith v Allwright Brief of Appellant

Topic

Notable Person

Organization

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in