NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment
Press Release
May 15, 1971

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment, 1971. 740b9582-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3b85a013-010c-445b-b2b0-39cb18e7f8a1/naacp-legal-defense-fund-holds-national-conference-on-capital-punishment. Accessed August 11, 2025.
Copied!
1g today a nati C rence on capital I river Law scare Court' th penalty purpose and aboli- demned eee cluda Fred NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397 stoman, Jr, - President onour life or death in capital cases. The Court also upheld the p by guilt and penalty at the same time. LDE t the Court tl cedures employed by the states allowed for hecked arbitrariness in to the concept of due proce o in the record of executions in the country. Of the 3,859 »ersons executed in the United States since 1930, 2,066 have be Of the 455 executed for rape, 405 have been black. The majority of the present death row inmates are black. Virtually all of the condemned are poor. The Court's recent decision reached only two of the issues by which LDF attorneys had been challenging the constitutionality of the death penalty throughout the country. Yet to be determined are: - Challenge to death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment. - Challenge to racial discrimination in the imposition of the death penalty in rape cases - Challenge to the manner in which the lower courts have limited the 1968 Supreme Court decision in Withe Vou EG -- which held that a person sent ed to death by a jury from which persons generally objecting to capital punishment had been excluded -- could not be executed - Challenge to the procedures by which most states fail to provide indigent condemned men with counsel at the post- appeal stage in capital cases These issues were outlined in detail before the Supreme Court in a brief just filed by LDF on behalf of 23 condemned men whose cases are now pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. In that brief. LDF attorneys argue that "substantial issues ... concerning the constitutionality of the death penalty and the states' procedures for imposing it should be heard by this Court before the United States -- which h not conducted a legal execution since June, 1967 -- resumes killing these men and women, and in (continued) of e wi con i Lf in part ¢ il i several consti n ac the death penalty and on the availability of clemency ation conden secure commutation the several extremely velopments Recently on -both of th -- Sen. Hart and Rep. Celler have indicated that next week they will introduce a bill in Congress Wor a twe year moratc um on tions while “facts underlying the states' ation of capita cons trtut } puntsment relevant k6nality and administ to the issues of due process “are the Bills are nov everal eller, prior Executive Action - Recently vy. Winthrop Roc to leaving office, commuted the death sentences Of ait 15% row in Arkansas and urged ott to take similar hroaghout the count2 Attorney General Fred Speaker of prior to leaving office, issued an executive order declaring the death penalty -cruel=and unusual punishment; ordering the dismantling of the electric chair, and ordering condémned prisone ceturned to the r popula dex a psyc office gene chamber has now Ik LDF o. inally became involved in capital punishment *throv representat of 1ern blacks sentenced to“@eathk for “the. x fe) whit nsive cudy, conducted during Dece 0£.1965, of 2,500 ra 20 year period, produced-over i evidence es Ge ip 1 b Z dad : on the S-of-Ti el In th c t } deat I prov itsel the*. re iN + yf rac 4, one already ta of more condemned is the highest fe The death penalty wit legitim of the right procedures of a just society. It this society is to move away from violence. §& will be eventually eliminated in this country tizes a method of coping with proble LDF h of the nation's to stop executions inflicted violence. at is the antithesis must be inated if ingalmost all civilized countries. How m I futile, tragic, senseless and indefensible it is tham: it has e been to kill the few poor, arbitrarily chosen few who must~die in the name of a theory that history has already repudiated. = Cpe {NOTE: " Ascopy o£-Mr. Greenberg's speech is attached.]