NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment
Press Release
May 15, 1971
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment, 1971. 740b9582-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3b85a013-010c-445b-b2b0-39cb18e7f8a1/naacp-legal-defense-fund-holds-national-conference-on-capital-punishment. Accessed December 04, 2025.
Copied!
1g today a nati C rence on capital
I river Law
scare Court'
th penalty
purpose
and aboli-
demned
eee cluda Fred
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397
stoman, Jr, - President
onour life or death in capital cases. The Court also upheld
the p by guilt and penalty at the
same time. LDE t the Court tl
cedures employed by the states allowed for hecked arbitrariness in
to the concept of due proce
o in the record of executions in
the country. Of the 3,859 »ersons executed in the United States since
1930, 2,066 have be Of the 455 executed for rape, 405 have
been black. The majority of the present death row inmates are black.
Virtually all of the condemned are poor.
The Court's recent decision reached only two of the issues by
which LDF attorneys had been challenging the constitutionality of the
death penalty throughout the country. Yet to be determined are:
- Challenge to death penalty as cruel and unusual punishment.
- Challenge to racial discrimination in the imposition of the
death penalty in rape cases
- Challenge to the manner in which the lower courts have
limited the 1968 Supreme Court decision in Withe
Vou EG -- which held that a person sent ed to
death by a jury from which persons generally objecting
to capital punishment had been excluded -- could not be
executed
- Challenge to the procedures by which most states fail to
provide indigent condemned men with counsel at the post-
appeal stage in capital cases
These issues were outlined in detail before the Supreme Court in
a brief just filed by LDF on behalf of 23 condemned men whose cases
are now pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. In that
brief. LDF attorneys argue that "substantial issues ... concerning
the constitutionality of the death penalty and the states' procedures
for imposing it should be heard by this Court before the United States
-- which h not conducted a legal execution since June, 1967 --
resumes killing these men and women, and in
(continued)
of
e wi con i Lf in part ¢ il i
several consti n ac
the death penalty and on the availability of clemency
ation conden secure commutation
the several extremely velopments Recently
on -both of th
-- Sen. Hart and Rep. Celler have indicated that
next week they will introduce a bill in
Congress Wor a twe year moratc um on
tions while “facts underlying the states'
ation of capita
cons trtut
} puntsment relevant
k6nality and
administ
to the issues of
due process “are
the Bills are nov
everal
eller, prior Executive Action - Recently vy. Winthrop Roc
to leaving office, commuted the death sentences
Of ait 15% row in Arkansas and
urged ott
to take similar
hroaghout the count2
Attorney General Fred Speaker of
prior to leaving office, issued an executive
order declaring the death penalty -cruel=and
unusual punishment; ordering the dismantling
of the electric chair, and ordering condémned
prisone ceturned to the r
popula dex
a psyc office
gene
chamber has now Ik
LDF o. inally became involved in capital punishment *throv
representat of 1ern blacks sentenced to“@eathk for “the. x fe)
whit nsive cudy, conducted during Dece 0£.1965,
of 2,500 ra 20 year period, produced-over i
evidence es Ge ip 1 b Z dad :
on the S-of-Ti el In th c t } deat I
prov itsel the*. re iN + yf rac 4, one
already ta of more
condemned
is the highest fe The death penalty
wit legitim
of the right procedures of a just society. It
this society is to move away from violence. §&
will be eventually eliminated in this country
tizes a method of coping with proble
LDF h
of the nation's
to stop executions
inflicted violence.
at is the antithesis
must be inated if
ingalmost all civilized countries. How m I futile, tragic,
senseless and indefensible it is tham: it has e been to kill the
few poor, arbitrarily chosen few who must~die in the name of a theory
that history has already repudiated.
= Cpe
{NOTE: " Ascopy o£-Mr. Greenberg's speech is attached.]