Defense Fund Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Reverse Freedom Rider Convictions

Press Release
June 16, 1964

Defense Fund Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Reverse Freedom Rider Convictions preview

Cite this item

  • Press Releases, Loose Pages. Defense Fund Asks U.S. Supreme Court to Reverse Freedom Rider Convictions, 1964. 589aec8b-bd92-ee11-be37-6045bddb811f. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3c5fc84b-6e92-403c-a60f-c98f8b717130/defense-fund-asks-us-supreme-court-to-reverse-freedom-rider-convictions. Accessed May 07, 2025.

    Copied!

    _ 10 Columbus Circle 

New York, N.Y. 10019 

JUdson 6-8397 

NAACP 

Legal Defense and Educational Fund 
PRESS RELEASE 
President 

Dr. Allan Knight Chalmers June 16, 1964 
Director-Counsel 

Tack Ceeenhere 
Associate Counsel 

Constance Baker Motley 

DEFENSE FUND ASKS U.S. SUPREME COURT 
TO REVERSE FREEDOM RIDER CONVICTIONS 

James Farmer Among Petitioners 

WASHINGTON, D.C.--The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund last 

week asked the nation's highest court to review the convictions of 

James Farmer, national director of CORE, and 28 other "Freedom 

Riders" arrested in 1961 in Jackson, Miss. 

The appeal by Defense Fund Director-Counsel Jack Greenberg to 

the Supreme Court represents the fifth step in the lengthy defense 

of the 303 persons who attempted peacefully to desegregate that 

city's bus and railroad terminal facilities. 

The State of Mississippi required separate trials for each of 

the 303 Freedom Riders, all of whom were convicted of breach of 

peace and disorderly conduct in City Court, fined from two hundred 

to five hundred dollars and given sentences ranging from 60 days, 

suspended,to four months in jail, not suspended. 

Two decided to pay their fines and serve their sentences, and 

on appeals to the County Court, 54 others chose not to contest the 

charges, accepting fines and suspended sentences. Bond money in 

excess of $370,000.00 had to be raised for those who continued to 

appeal, 

Last week's action on behalf of Mr, Farmer and the other 28 

leaves over 200 cases pending at various levels of the Mississippi 

courts. Defense Fund attorneys had repeatedly asked that the cases 

be consolidated, as the facts and charges were practically identi- 

cal, but Mississippi repeatedly denied this request. 

Mississippi's unusual requirement of separate trials, held 

two a day over many months, has brought Defense Fund legal expenses 

in this case to more than $70,000.00, Those who sought new trials 

in County Court had their convictions affirmed and their sentences 

increased to $500.00 fines and four months in jail. 

(more) 

Jesse DeVore, Jr., Director of Public Information—Night Number 212 Rlverside 9-8487 ee) 



Defense Fund Asks U,S. Supreme Court -2- June 16, 1964 
to Reverse Freedom Rider Convictions 

The cases continued at snail's pace on appeals to the Circuit 

Court and the Mississippi Supreme Court throughout 1962 and 1963. 

The state courts consistently refused to consider the constitu- 

tional arguments raised by Defense Fund lawyers, and in March of 

this year the Mississippi Supreme Court affirmed the convictions 

appealed last week, 

: Jackson Police Captain J.L. Ray, who made the arrests imme- 

diately upon the arrival of the racially mixed groups at the 

terminals of the Greyhound and Trailways bus lines and the Illinois 

Central Railroad Station, repeatedly testified that the defendants 

were at all times peaceful. 

It was their "presence," their refusal to leave the terminals, 

that was offered as evidence of guilt. Captain Ray cited the 

"ugly and angry" mood of gathered white persons as a reason for 

asking the Freedom Riders to leave, but at no time did he arrest 

any of those who threatened to create disturbances. 

Among the defendants are several whose bus was overturned 

and burned near Anniston, Ala. on the way to Jackson. Others ar- 

rived by train from Memphis in the drive to test interstate travel 

facilities throughout the South, 

In support of the appeal submitted last.week to the U.S, 

Supreme Court, Legal Defense Fund attorneys made the following 

points: 

*the convictions violate due process of law, as guaranteed 

by the Fourteenth Amendment, in that the records show no 

evidence of guilt; 

*the convictions violate due process of law, since the breach 

of the peace statute is so vague as to give no ascertainable 

standard of guilt, and fails to warn of the conduct punishable; 

*the arrests, prosecutions, and convictions fly in the face 

of due process and equal protection of the laws, since they 

were “designed to enforce racial segregation required by 

state statutes and by ordinance of the City of Jackson in 

interstate facilities;" 

(more) 



Defense Fund Asks U.S. Supreme Court -3- June 16, 1964 
to Reverse Freedom Rider Convictions 

*the convictions violate the First and Fourteenth Amend- 

ments, since the Freedom Riders were exercising their 

rights of free expression and assembly in their peaceful 

actions; 

*the prosecutions violated the "Commerce Clause" of the U.S. 

Constitution (Art. 1, Sect. 8, clause 3), since they 

placed an illegal burden on commerce. Federal law forbids 

racial discrimination in interstate travel facilities, 

The State now has a month in which to reply to the Defense 

Fund brief, after which the high court will decide whether or 

not it will review the convictions. Because of the summer recess, 

a decision is not likely until after the Court convenes in the 

fall. 

Joining Director-Counsel Greenberg in the appeal were James 

M, Nabrit III and Derrick A. Bell of the Defense Fund's New York 

headquarters, and Jack Young, Carsie A, Hall and R,. Jess Brown, 

Fund cooperating attorneys in Jackson. 

Messrs. Young, Hall and Brown are the only lawyers in the 

entire state of Mississippi who handle civil rights cases. 

Of counsel in the proceedings were Carl Rachlin, general 

counsel of CORE, and Leroy D. Clark and Michael Meltsner of the 

Legal Defense Fund. 

- 30 -

Copyright notice

© NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Return to top