Rights of Student Groups Advanced in Far-Reaching Court Decision - LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student Organization Ousted by Arkansas College
Press Release
August 15, 1970
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Rights of Student Groups Advanced in Far-Reaching Court Decision - LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student Organization Ousted by Arkansas College, 1970. 11e0a534-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e58da3b-5e10-471f-8ba8-165bf735a429/rights-of-student-groups-advanced-in-far-reaching-court-decision-ldf-wins-reinstatement-of-bi-racial-student-organization-ousted-by-arkansas-college. Accessed November 03, 2025.
Copied!
ee)
+ \e
t aa
President
Hon. Francis E. Rivers
PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel
k Greenb
egal fefense und dick Creenbore
FOR RELEASE Director, Public Relations
| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. : Tana Dovare Ie.
10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 Saturday, August nds pode 2O7-%187
RIGHTS OF STUDENT GROUP'S ADVANCED
IN FAR-REACHING COURT DECISION
LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student
Organization Ousted by Arkansas College
ST. LOUIS, MO.---In the first decision of its kind, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Eighth Circuit here has extended First Amendment guarantees of free
expression and association to a campus student organization.
The ruling came late last week in a suit brought by the NAACP Legal
Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) on behalf of a bi-racial student
group and its faculty advisers at SouthernState College in Magnolia, Arkansas.
The LDF suit charged that college officials violated the constitutionally
protected rights of free speech and association of Students United for
Rights and Equality (SURE), the largest and "only truly integrated student
group on campus."
LDF attorneys maintained that, from SURE's inception in the fall of 1968,
there was a sustained pattern of harrassment and discrimination because of
the bi-racial character of the organization, culminating in the revocation
of its charter and the termination of its faculty advisers' connections with
the college.
SURE's stated purposes include:
(a) to provide an organized program of leadership and
participation among representatives of all races,
nationalities and religions.
(b) to provide service to the college in order to assist
in the realization of its goals.
(c) to stimulate closer relationships among members of
all races, nationalities and religions.
(a) to provide members an opportunity to develop
philosophies regarding human relations.
The first major crackdown on SURE came in February of 1969 after it
wrote a letter to a local minister requesting an explanation for his church's
refusal to admit four black students to a Sunday service.
On March 24, 1969 official recognition of SURE was suspended because
it defied an administration demand that a previously extended speaker invi-
tation be withdrawn.
The speakers were invited to show and then discuss an AFL-CIO produced
film on race relations.
(more)
i
|
In reversing a lower court ruling, the Appeals Court held that
First Amendment rights of the membership and advisers of SURE were violated:
"the administrators had no right to prohibit SURE from expressing its
views on integration....or to impose sanctions on its members or advisers
for expressing these views," and the administrators "had no right to
demand that the speaking invitation....be withdrawn or to impose sanctions
for the refusal to withdraw it."
Further, the Court's opinion declared that SURE "had conducted its
activities in a mature, responsible manner during that entire period."
The Court ordered the removal of SURE's suspension and probation
and the rescission of any orders prohibiting the holding of office
in SURE or serving as adviser to SURE.
The Arkansas State Advisory Committee to the United States Commission
on Civil Rights conducted an inquiry into the two incidents at Southern
State College. They published a report in June, 1969, which was critical of
the administrators' handling of the incidents and it suggested recommendations.
=30=
NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate and distinct
organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials
are retainedin our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and
Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to LDF.