Rights of Student Groups Advanced in Far-Reaching Court Decision - LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student Organization Ousted by Arkansas College
Press Release
August 15, 1970

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Volume 6. Rights of Student Groups Advanced in Far-Reaching Court Decision - LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student Organization Ousted by Arkansas College, 1970. 11e0a534-ba92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e58da3b-5e10-471f-8ba8-165bf735a429/rights-of-student-groups-advanced-in-far-reaching-court-decision-ldf-wins-reinstatement-of-bi-racial-student-organization-ousted-by-arkansas-college. Accessed June 01, 2025.
Copied!
ee) + \e t aa President Hon. Francis E. Rivers PRESS RELEASE Director-Counsel k Greenb egal fefense und dick Creenbore FOR RELEASE Director, Public Relations | NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND, INC. : Tana Dovare Ie. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019 * JUdson 6-8397 Saturday, August nds pode 2O7-%187 RIGHTS OF STUDENT GROUP'S ADVANCED IN FAR-REACHING COURT DECISION LDF Wins Reinstatement of Bi-Racial Student Organization Ousted by Arkansas College ST. LOUIS, MO.---In the first decision of its kind, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit here has extended First Amendment guarantees of free expression and association to a campus student organization. The ruling came late last week in a suit brought by the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. (LDF) on behalf of a bi-racial student group and its faculty advisers at SouthernState College in Magnolia, Arkansas. The LDF suit charged that college officials violated the constitutionally protected rights of free speech and association of Students United for Rights and Equality (SURE), the largest and "only truly integrated student group on campus." LDF attorneys maintained that, from SURE's inception in the fall of 1968, there was a sustained pattern of harrassment and discrimination because of the bi-racial character of the organization, culminating in the revocation of its charter and the termination of its faculty advisers' connections with the college. SURE's stated purposes include: (a) to provide an organized program of leadership and participation among representatives of all races, nationalities and religions. (b) to provide service to the college in order to assist in the realization of its goals. (c) to stimulate closer relationships among members of all races, nationalities and religions. (a) to provide members an opportunity to develop philosophies regarding human relations. The first major crackdown on SURE came in February of 1969 after it wrote a letter to a local minister requesting an explanation for his church's refusal to admit four black students to a Sunday service. On March 24, 1969 official recognition of SURE was suspended because it defied an administration demand that a previously extended speaker invi- tation be withdrawn. The speakers were invited to show and then discuss an AFL-CIO produced film on race relations. (more) i | In reversing a lower court ruling, the Appeals Court held that First Amendment rights of the membership and advisers of SURE were violated: "the administrators had no right to prohibit SURE from expressing its views on integration....or to impose sanctions on its members or advisers for expressing these views," and the administrators "had no right to demand that the speaking invitation....be withdrawn or to impose sanctions for the refusal to withdraw it." Further, the Court's opinion declared that SURE "had conducted its activities in a mature, responsible manner during that entire period." The Court ordered the removal of SURE's suspension and probation and the rescission of any orders prohibiting the holding of office in SURE or serving as adviser to SURE. The Arkansas State Advisory Committee to the United States Commission on Civil Rights conducted an inquiry into the two incidents at Southern State College. They published a report in June, 1969, which was critical of the administrators' handling of the incidents and it suggested recommendations. =30= NOTE: Please bear in mind that the LDF is a completely separate and distinct organization even though we were established by the NAACP and those initials are retainedin our name. Our correct designation is NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., frequently shortened to LDF.