NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment
Press Release
May 5, 1972
Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. NAACP Legal Defense Fund Holds National Conference on Capital Punishment, 1972. 589b38ba-bd92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3e87ad69-7c52-4348-a442-39fc9ea4ee3b/naacp-legal-defense-fund-holds-national-conference-on-capital-punishment. Accessed November 23, 2025.
Copied!
ress Release A
= crisis upholding
the co
death
her
June 2, 1967.
lators and
now
NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc. | 10 Columbus Circle | New York, N.Y. 10019 | (212) 586-8397
William T. Coleman, Jr. - President Jack Greenberg - Director-Counsel
the ] t ick ies < helt ; fy
same time. LDF at ieys | é a ¢ the Cot t th
cedures employed by tate allo f i ch rt
the sentencing proce
Arbitrarines Ss in the record
the country. Of the 2d in the
1930, 2,066 have been black. Of the 455 =cuted
been black. The majority of the present death row inmates are black
Virtually all of the condemned are poor.
The Court's recent decision reached only two of the issues by
which LDF attorneys had been challenging the constitutionality of the
death penalty throughout the country. Yet to be determined are:
- Challenge to death penalty as cruel and unusual punis ent.
» Challenge to racial discrimination in the imposition of the
death penalty in rape cases
h by a jury from which persons
to capital punishment had been excl
executed
generally objecting
uded -- could not be
- Challenge to the procedures by which most states fail to
provide indigent condemned men with counsel at the post-
appeal stage in capital cases
These issues were outlined in detail before the Supreme Court in
a brief just filed by LDF on behalf of 23 condemned men whose cases
are now pending in the Supreme Court of the United States. In that
brief. LDF attorneys argue that "sub antial issues ... concerning
the constitutionality of the death penalty anc the states' procedures
for imposing it shov j be heard by this Court before the United States
-- which has not conducted a legal e: cution since June, 1967 —-
resumes killing these men and women, and in unprecedentea numbe
(continued)
bo
LD. origi
representation
white ‘wome
of 2,500 rap
evid the
cutive
Niet ic yn I Lf t ¢
l ¢ > wit a detailed dis-—
constitutional ition, the
or Lbiliti action against
on 12 avai Lty of 1ency procedures to
th te
ve been several extremely vital developments
Yak indicated tl
i1 roducé bill: an
Congxr« for a two y morat m on execu
tions id facts underlying 1e states'
administration of capi nt relevant
to
a
the
Bill ng int fo}
severa bol ty.
Action -- Rec ly ¢ Win op Roc ller, prior
sd the death sentences
I 8) i Arkansas and
ut the cy
simi
Attorney General Fred of ILA,
pri *6 leaving c il an € i
order declari
w 1 punisi ordering ai
St tie ee chai i orc
prisone € i gene
populatior The death che t ov cor
a psytholo “s¢
nally became- involve in capital punish thre
of southern blac s ed tt th for the rape of
An 6€xtensive study, ducted @ v
cases over a 20 perio rodu ce
the h p
fx n the s i In th contex he < }
to all th deat rol nmat
; < ’ Lf more than half nation's
tanc ready to do whatever possible to stop cutions
of state infl
It legitimatizes a method of coping with probl
ires proceé of a just society. It must be
sty is to move away from violence. Surely the
1 be eventually eliminated in this country as it has
futil z2d countries. tow. mu in almost all ci
and indefensftble it “is than it has ever been snseles
chosen few who must die in the few poor, arb
that histor dy repudiated.
-—--00-—-
J {NOT: A copy of Mr.’ Greenberg