Appendix 2 and 3 -- News Articles and Nunez Plan

Unannotated Secondary Research
October 31, 1981 - November 15, 1981

Appendix 2 and 3 -- News Articles and Nunez Plan preview

39 pages

Cite this item

  • Case Files, Major v. Treen Hardbacks. Appendix 2 and 3 -- News Articles and Nunez Plan, 1981. bec23b94-c703-ef11-a1fd-6045bdec8a33. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/3f268c89-213c-4642-97c5-4c185c572beb/appendix-2-and-3-news-articles-and-nunez-plan. Accessed November 05, 2025.

    Copied!

    APPENDIX 2 

News Articles 

 



  
  

-\ 

  

The Times-Picayune/ Ihe States-liem Section 1, Page 11 Saturday, October 31, 1981 

NOTE 
  

  TE EN ROP 
  OTHE 

  

‘ 
wy 

\ 
1 

  

  

PME SRM TE 

. Capita) bureau 

"BATON ROUGE — Most of the con- 
roversy over reapportionment 
pparently is going to focus on con-.. 

‘gressional redistricting, with plans 
being proposed for reapportioning the 
Legislature expected to have relatively 
lear sailing. Sm aah 
There undoubtedly will be some loud 

+ debate and moaning and groaning from 
individual lawmakers who might feel 

ggrieved by the final composition of 
the. House and Senate districts, but a 

; Majority of each chamber appears. 
- Féady to produce a final remapping of 
Its districts at the special session open- 

lng Monday. | : 
: We use the word relatively, because 
0 years ago reapportionment was 

il sdecided on by a special master 97 dppolnted by 
ture falled to reapportion itself. 

t the outset, reapportionment of 
probably was the one most 

8ht with danger, simply because of 
Rumbers — 105 House seats com- 
ed'to 39 in the Senate and eight in 
fungressional districts, | 
¥ me any current district's lines 
there was an immediate rip- 
lect on a neighboring district, 
Jneant every House member 

3 

a federal judge after the 

© would fel the effect in one degres or 
5 ort ili 

When Rep. Emile’ C' “Peppl” Brun. 
- eau, Ind-New Orleans, and the mem- 
.bers of his subcommittee on House 

ting together a cohesive, acceptable 
at least to a majority) plan, they had 

MAthresfoldtask.. . .  ... 
.... First, the subcommittee had to 
"arrive at an arithmetical resolution — 
.a numbers game matching population 
with a median figure and minimum 
deviation. . -.. 

+. Second, it was necessary to develop 
a plan that would meet any standard of 
non-diseriminatiori acceptable to the 
U.S, Justice Department under the 

- Voting Rights Act and one that can 
withstand any court challenge. . 

_ +And third, there was the political 
“Jeshlem of dealing with incumbent 
awmakers, none of whom wanted 

- ‘either to be lumped in a district with 
another incumbent or.to have their dis- 

- tricts revised in such a fashion as to 
make their re-election more difficult. 

. Dividing the state mathematically 
was never a real problem. A computer 

~ had little difficulty with that. If was - 
those other two factors, non-discrimi- - 

‘reapportionment began their job of .- 
utfin 

"2" The same three parameters may be 
- applied to senatorial and congressional 
redistricting. 
.Bruneau is convinced that for the 

.most part the House subcommittee has 

.produced a plan that will survive all 
three tests and pass the Legislature. 

:- One last hurdle In Caddo Parish, 
- Bruneau said, seems to have been 
worked out, with the Caddo delegation 
devising new districts for themselves 
that they can vote for. There still may 
be some other minor amendments on 

. precincts here and there; but for the 
“most part, the plan will stand up, 
- Bruneau predicted. 
¢ Black legislators have indicated dis- 

- pleasure with the House plan because 
* it doesn’t provide enough black major- 

ity districts to assure more black rep- 
resentatives. Blacks have asked for as 
many as 18 such districts in the state, 
but the number is now at 13. 

_ If the present proposal passes, the 
next resort for the blacks would most 
likely be the courts. Given the mood of 
the Reagan administration, anything 
other than the most blatant discrimina- 
tion is not likely to be rejected by the 
Justice Department. 

- The present legislative course of pation toward minorities, principally , 
blacks, and the politics of Incumbency - 
that posed the real challenge. 
  TR aia EL e333 2 Ib C5 3 ER TE 9 

MEPS FA n Toner sid Hand BABEL) died) 

‘ ONS ad 
> 

SE) 
{-} 

mittee, which has charge of all of the 
reapportionment proposals, will begin 
its hearings Tuesday. is ; 

Bruneau said he believes the Public- 
Service Commission reapportionment 
plan will be disposed-of first, quickly 
and easily. There has been very little 
opposition to what has beeh proposed 
for the five public service districts. 

Then, he said, he hopes the commit- 
tee will move on to the House reappor- 
tionment plan before taking up con. 
gressional redistricting — the most 
controversial of all. : 

He sald that whatever bill the House 
passes on, House reapportionment is 
unlikely to have any difficulty In the 
Senate. Conversely, whatever the Sen- 
ate adopts for Senate reapportionment 
will have little trouble in the House. 

Bruneau had tried unsuccessfully to 
" get the governor to hold a special ses- 
sion dealing only with reapportion- 
ment. But the governor included 41 
items in the call, a number of which 
call for technical changes in botched- 
up laws passed in the regular session. 

. But there Is also over $100 million in 
appropriations being planned, includ- 
ing spending from the Enhanced Min- 
eral Trust Fund. 

“Hopefully,” Bruneau said, “we 
won't get the reapportionment process 
caught in the log-rolling process.”    



  

Joint panel 
may decide” 
La. remap 
By JACK WARDLAW ” 
Capital bureas fiessii 

BATON ROUGE — Although a 
least six plans to reapportion Louisi 

ana’s congressional districts are beforé 
the Legislature, nobody yet has seen 

the plan that utlimately will bg 
adopted, the chairman of the Senate 
Reapportionment Study Committee 
said Monday. i 

The ultimate plan probably will be 

  

  

  
    

  

se
q 

H 
SM
 

ua
qu
mo
du
r 

ay
y,
 

-j
oe
dw
od
 

I 

‘P
re
s 

33
00
8 

Nn
oo
g 

un
y 

uo
ne
al
d 

Ju
im
-j
yd
ur
 
aw
os
 

4 o
u 

§]
,,
 

"2
86
1 

ut 
wy
 

pi
pu
ed
 

[e
nu
aj
od
 

e 
* 

Bu
ip
re
 

£[
qi
ss
od
 

pu
e 

Aj
re
an
ij
od
 

ua
ye
am
 

0) 
11
0j
}3
 

ue
 

se
 

‘u
on
3|
a 

[e
ro
 

1,
 
ue
di
iq
nd
ay
 

07
 

je
ld
ow
aq
g 

ur
de
sy
 

pr
eu
oy
 

“
J
a
y
e
 

L
w
u
w
p
 

3(
] 

10
) 

A[
3u
oa
js
 

q 
pa
uu
er
d 

se
 
jo
Ln
si
p 

Pa
3j
04
 
as
no
y 

ay
y 

ay
 

pi
es

 
10
2g
. 

1 
P
a
z
 

se
 

eL
pu
ex
al
y 

jo 
Su
e 

“pg
 s

in
 

do
 

an
es
do
wa
(y
 

18
61

 
‘€ 

39
qu
ia
no
p]
 
‘A
ep
sa
n 

4) 
uy 

us
a 

B-
J1
3q
ue
] 

si
n 

SI
 
9d
eq
 
wo
uy
 
pa
nu
ry
uo
y)
 

u
e
d
j
i
q
n
d
a
y
 

js
ur
ed
e 

Je
I2
0W
 

-e
uI
aq
n3
 
G6
7 

o 

A s
u
e
d
 

oj
 

os
je
 

pu
e 

og
y 

uy 

‘ 
“ 

d
o
w
 

31 
d
e
w
 

0) 
M
o
g
 

ue
 

se
 
j
o
s
 

)s
ui
ed
e 

ag
e 

cial legislative session, said Sen.Z:Y 
Thomas H. Hudson, D-Baton Rouge. © 

His House counterpart, Rep. John W. 
“Jock” Scott, D-Alexandria, agreed 
that a conference committee probably 
will have to make the final decision, 
but added that is not necessarily a bad 
thing. “Conference committees are 
part of the legislative process, and it’s 
a good process,” said Scott. ban 

Hudson and Scott, who is chairman 
of the House and Governmental Affairs 
Committee, spoke and answered ques-’ 
tions at a luncheon meeting of the § 
Baton Rouge Press Club at the 
Ramada Inn in Port Allen. ° : y 

_ © At a separate news conference later, 
. David C. Treen said he, too, thinks 

t possible that congressional redis- 
tricting may go to conference, but he 
said that is “normal legislative proce- 
dure.” . 

Treen also said that his three alter- 
native plans for redrawing the states 
eight congressional districts are to be 
filed as administration pills, He rei- 
-terated that he does not oppose the 
idea of creating a black-majority dis- 
trict, but opposes existing proposals to 
do 0 because of the effect they have 
on adjoining districts. © 

Hudson predicted that a Senate com- 
mittee Tuesday will scrap a plan 
approved last week by his study com- 

. mittee and replace it with one creating 
separate New Orleans and Jefferson 
Parish districts. a 
“That pian has gained momentum,” FIP 

Hudson said. “I think it will ultimately Zits ; 

be approved by the Senate,” but it is Elrmasiicas 
not necessarily ‘acceptable to the SSHUGH 
House. Hudson said he personally F- 

that plan because it splits the 
city of Baton Rouge between two dis- 

“You also have to remember that 
the governor is adamantly opposed to 
that plan” Hudson said. Treen has the 
right to veto any plan the Legislature yc... ~ 
p : pproves. ht 

Hudson and Scott agreed that the 
plans for redoing the state House and p- 
Senate districts are far less controver- | 
sial and probably will pass with little 
difficulty. . 

Scott said he feels that House and 
Senate versions of a plan to redraw the 
five state Public Service Commission 
districts are so different that that mat- 
ter, too, is likely to go to a confer- 

:7. But Scott said he thinks the House 
‘and Senate congressional plans con- 

. tain no “irreconcilable differences” 
and getting agreement may not be ‘as 
difficuit as many suppose. 
"Scott defended the: House proposal 

for redrawing the 8th Congressional 

Tura to next page 

ii
d 

3p
 
Ae
wl
 
fo
ur
s 

Gl
 
98
ed
 

‘| 
u
o
n
o
a
g
 

ay
) 

uj
-a
py
- 

uo
d 

ay
y,
 19p

 
q 
pa
yo
eq
 

D 

“K
ep
sa
up
ay
 

0)
 
si
ej
jy
 

10
 

pa
[n
pa
yo
s 

sy
 
s
a
w
 

[e
ju
sw
uI
LA
0n
) 

-1
eq
 
Bu
po
ps
ip
a 

‘M
ou
 
de
 
£3
y)
 

1. 
de
qi
uy
s 

sa
up
 
Jo
us
ip
 

ay)
 

— 
UO
Sp
ny
 
pu
e 

— 
uo
yj
eS
a 

Bu
oy
 

0) 
sy
 

d
e
w
s
i
 

op
 

un
as
u 

Je
y)
 

je
 

} 
pu
g 

‘A
ep
sa
ng
, 

JI
V 

[e
ju
aw
ut
as
cy
) 

pu
e 

J9
q 
W
d
 

0} 
pa
[n
pa
ya
s 

sy 

ay
 

A 

an
ss
 
du
na
in
si
pa
l 

[e
uo
js
sa
ad
uo
d 

ay
y,
 

1 
[
B
U
O
J
S
S
3
I
T
!
 

J3
f 

pu
g 

sue
ags

g 
J
u
n
y
d
 

ay
) 

ay
my
ns
qn
s 

0 
3 

[H
O 

Su
ny
ds
 

pu
g 

as
no
y 

Sa
ou
ey
d 

us
o 

si
y 

di
ay
 

oj 
Su
r 

7
 

a)
 

20
) 

ea
py
 
Aw
 

ju
se
m 

81
31
00
8 

Je
y)
 
aB
re
yo
 

s 

«U
ON
MN
SU
0)
 

ayy
 

uy 
pa
sm
ba
s 

SI
OI
NS
Ip
 

[e
uo
ys
sa
du
od
 

ay
 

op
al
 

‘p
re
s 

ay
 

[B
U0
}s
sa
1d
uo
d 

Ju
aq
um
du
y 

J 

I,
 

i 
-A
n 

‘3
uo
 

10
j 

u
o
s
i
a
 

i 
ue
d 

d
u
a
n
e
 

ue
 

aq
 
[1
4 

aa
y 

K
e
m
 
a
y
y
 o 

. 
9
d
M
N
I
u
w
o
)
 

si
e 

?j
eU
ag
S 

ay
) 

31
0 

sd
aa
y 

ye
y)
 

0}
 
aa
nj
ej
si
d 

2 ' ¢ L
S
!
 

  
  

  

    

  

  

    
  
      WaLli-SdLVvLlS dHL / ANNAV

O
I
d
-
S
a
W
I
L
 

d
H
 

L 

 



La. Sena%e pas 
“for congre ! 

{ 
i 

i 

Other reapportionment stories, Pages 
29,21 
By JACK WARDLAW 
and BILL LYNCH 

“4 Capital bureau 
BATON ROUGE — The Senate 

Wednesday ‘approved a congressional “4 redistricting plan that creates separate 

- 
r
e
r
 

ss
 
Y
a
s
 
A
T
T
 

—
—
—
 

= 
nF
 
in
s 

gi
n 

black-majority and Jefferson Parish- 
majority districts, but Gov. David C. 
Treen’s administration began to show its muscle in the remap controversy. 

In effect, the advocates of the Jef- ferson-Black Caucus plan split a doub- 
leheader with the Treen forces. A 
House committee adopted a Treen- 
backed plan that likely will be voted on 
by the full House Thursday, while the 
Senate rejected another Treen plan by 
only three votes, 

In other redistricting matters, the 
Senate also approved a plan to reap- 
portion its own election districts, the 
House passed a House redistricting 
plan of its own, and a House committee 
and the full Senate approved conflict- 
ing proposals to reapportion the state’s 
Public Service Commission districts. 
Meanwhile, Wednesday’s Senate action on congressional reapportion- 

ment leaves that complicated battle in 
this posture: 

The Senate has now sent the House a 
bill whose principal backers are Sens. Joseph M. Tiemann, D-Metairie, and Samuel B. Nunez, D-Chalmette. The * measure puts nearly all of New Orleans in a district with a 54 percent black majority, and most of Jefferson i in a district shared with St. Bernard, Plaquemines and part of Algiers but which Jefferson is in a position to dom- . inate. 
Legislative sources said Treen was calling lawmakers Wednesday nd making it clear he will veto the Nuncz- 

— pg seme 

Tiemann plan if it reaches his desk, but 
the Senate approved it by a vote of 
31-6. 

That bill now goes to the House and 
Govermental Affairs Committee, 
which Wednesday voted down an iden- 
tical plan by a vote of 12-3. 
Amid heavy lobbying by Treen aides, 

the House committee, by an identical 
12-3 vote, approved a motion by Rep. 
Terry Gee, R-Algiers, that it send to 
the House floor the governor's “Pro- 
posal B,” a plan that leaves New 
Orleans area districts much as they 
are today. Ta 

Rep. Diana A. Bajoie, D-New Orleans, upposed the plan because, she said, “it continues to dilute the black vote.” The plan leaves District 2, a combined Orleans-Jefferson district, only about 44 percent black. She said she will try to change it on the House floor. ha Sr. 43: 
Rep. John A. Alario Jr., D-Westwego, and Jefferson Parish Assessor Lawrence E. Chehardy, urged the 

panel to approve the Nunez-Tiemann 
plan. Chehardy said. it “recognizes Lhe 
dramatic changes that have taken 
effect in Jefferson Parish. . «. No 
one can adequately represent (both) 
New Orleans and Jefferson because 
they are opposing views.” 

' "Reps. Emile “Peppi” Bruneau, Ind- 
New Orleans, and Lane A. Carson, R- 

between two congressional districts. : 
In the Senate, Nunez had better luck. His plan had been approved Tuesday 

by the Senate and Governmental 
Affairs Committee by a 7-0 vote, and 
he easily beat back an attempt by Sen. Allan Bares, D-Lafayette, to re} lace it with Treen's “Proposal C.” {Treen 

  

  

  

Fd 

ssionai remap 

“delegation voted against it, with the 

“burn, D-Bogalusa, and Fritz H. Wind- “horst, D-Algiers, both of whom voted § “yes, and Sen. Theodore 

by 
| 

offered three alternate proposals for 
congressional redistricting, Proposal C}' has little effect on the New Orleans’ area, but revamps Southwest Louisiana 
by placing Lake Charles and Alexan- 
dria in the same district.) 

The Bares amendment. was beaten 
28-7, with the New Orleans area deleg- 
ation voting solidly against jt. , © 

Sen. Cecil Picard, D-Maurice, then brought up Treen’s “Proposal 4A,” which makes little change in the pres- ent districts in New Orleans or else- where, : Le 
With Treen’s top aides, John Cade 

and William Nungesser, lobbying in the rear of the chamber, the proposal 
made a surprisingly good showing, los- 
ingonly 20-17. ~~" 

Nearly all the New Orleans area 

exception of Sens. B. B. “Sixty” Ray-   
New Orleans, who was absent. 

The Senate then approved the 
Nunez-Tiemann plan 30-6, with all 
New Orleans area members except the 
absent Hickey voting yes. 

Nunez strongly attacked the sugges- tion that his plan is designed to permit him to run for Congress against Republican U.S. Rep. Bob Livingston 
. of Algiers. New Orleans, objected on grounds that 

New Orleans has always been split 
“Tle said he has no plans to run for 

Congress and if he did, he would prefer 
to run from the present 1st District, 
which includes a large share of New 
Orleans. 

Nunez said the proposed new district voted G5 percent for Republican Treen 
in his race against Democrat Louis 
Lambert, while the present/1st District gave Treen only 55 percent. 

M. Hickey, D- § 

  

135 Apa 
3 AZ a 

a 

18
61
 

‘C 
19

qu
ia

ao
N 

‘
A
e
p
s
i
n
y
 |. 

¢ 
g]
98
ed
 

‘| 
uo
no
nd
g 

        

2 
3
i
-
S
8
1
Y
1
S
 

A
H
L
 

/ 
I
N
A
A
Y
O
I
E
 

S
I
N
S
 

d
H
.
 

tr
pe
 

pa
ns
. 

“
I
 E
L
 

rs 

a
z
o
 

 



-House comrgittee refuses t@vote — 
on Senate-passed redistrict plan 
By JACK WARDLAW 
Capital bureau 
BATON ROUGE — The process of 

redrawing the boundaries of Louisi- 
ana’s eight congressional districts 
stalled Thursday when a House com- 
mittee refused to take final action on a 
Senate-passed redistricting bill. 

And a district reapportionment plan 
backed by Gov. David C. Treen 
remained on the House calendar as the 
lower chamber became embroiled in a 
day-long discussion of the governor's 

. $70 million plan to aid local govern- 
_ ments. 

The House and Governmental 
Affairs Committee was to meet again 
Friday. Chairman John W. Scott, D- 

At Alexandria, promised that the Senate _ 
bill — or some amended version of it 
= will be voted on at that meeting. 

H 
i 

Only two congressional redistricting 
plans are before the Legislature, 
though others are waiting in the wings 
and there are unconfirmed reports that 
a new plan might bd on the way from 
the delegation in Washington. 

The two “live” plans, and their sta- 
tus in the legislative process, are: 

— Treen’s “Proposal B.” One of 
three plans offered.by the governor, 
this one leaves New. Orleans area dis- 

‘tricts much as they are today but 
makes extensive changes in South and 
Central Louisiana. It shifts Lafayette 
from the 7th District of Democratic 
US. Rep. John Breaux of Crowley, to 

the. 8th District of Democratic Rep. 
Gillis W. Long of Alexandria. 

That plan was approved Wednesday 
by ‘the House“and Governmental * * 
Affairs Committeé and“ had been 

expected to be debated Thursday after- 
noon by the full House. But the House 
took all day on the local government 
bill and the remap plan was held up 

- until Friday at the earliest. 
— The Senate plan, co-authored by 

Sens. M. Joseph Tiemann, D-Metairie, 
and Samuel B. Nunez, D-Chalmette. 
That plan splits Orleans and Jefferson, 
making a black-majority district out of 
most of Orleans and making Jefferson 
the base of a revised Ist District that’ 
would include most of Jefferson, part 
of Algiers and the parishes of St. Ber- 
nard and Plaquemines. 

That plan cleared the Senate 
Wednesday and was debated for more 
than two hours Thursday morning in 
House and Governmental Afturs died } 

hry to next page : 

    

Section 1, Page 22 Friday. November 6, 1981 3 

) 

  

The Times-Picayune/ The States-Item 

Panel delays remap vote FE 
Continued from Page ar. 

the panel decided to delay final action 
until Friday. .. ~~ 

The committee, which had approved 
Treen's Proposal B by a 12-3 vote 
Wednesday, came within a single vote 
Thursday of scrapping it and replacing 
it with the Senate plan. 

Nunez and Jefferson Parish Assessor 
Lawrence E. Chehardy presented the 
Senate plan to the committee, urging 

members to approve it and make Jef- 
ferson the base of a congressional dis- 
trict for the first time. 

Rep. Emile “Peppi” Bruneau, Ind- 
New Orleans, suggested that a better 
idea would be to revise the 2nd District 
of Democratic Rep. Lindy Boggs of 
New Orleans to give Jefferson a 
majority in that district. He said he is 
working on such a plan. 

State Rep. Terry Gee, R- Algiers, 
moved that the committee junk the 
Seaals plan and replace it with Treen’s 
Proposal B.  .. 

Rep. Luke LeBlanc, D-Lafayette, 
objected, saying that the Treen plan . 
“destroys the base of. Breaux’s dis- 
trigt.” + 

“I think Gov. Treda has gone off the 
deep end; trying to do this to Lafayette 
Parish ‘which gave him 30,000 votes. in 
the election,” LeBlanc. said. 

Rep. John A. Alario Jr., D-Westwego, 
said the Treen plan ‘‘does more 
damange than many others I've seen.” 

Gee's motion first lost on a 7-6 vote, 
but when LeBlanc asked the commit- 
tee to approve the Senate plan, that 
also lost 7-6. After more discussion and 
with two more committee members in 
the room, Gee tried again and the 
Treen plan was adopted as.an amend- 
ment to the Senate bill by an 8-7 vote. 

Gee then tried to get the bill 
reported to the floor, but Rep. James 
Martin, D-Welsh, who had voted with , 
Gee on the amendment, said he would 
not vote to report the bill out. He said 
he has been told that the congressional 
delegation plans to produce a new plan 
Friday, and urged the panel to wait 
and consider that before taking a final 
votes At Martin's urging, members 
voted to defer action. 

A check of congressional offices in 
Washington produced no confirmation 
that a new plan is in the works. Sources 
here said some amendmen 7 the 
EAI FIO 

ad 
Hint al Ee rsenped 

delegation-backed plan are on the way,’ 
probably creating a Jefferson-majority 
2nd district. 

Legislative sources said House mem- 
bers are in no hurry to send any bill to 
the Senate because they believe sena- 
tors will amend their plan to conform 
to the Senate version — exactly as Gee 
‘did to the Senate bill Thursday. 

If that attitude prevails, both houses 
could spend the next few days playing 
cat-and-mouse before the matter fin- [ 
ally gets before a joint House-Senate 
conference committee. 

- Earlier Thursday the House and 
Governmental Affairs Committee 
challenged the Senate by taking the 
Senate-passed bill revising ‘the five 
Public Service Commission Districts 
and amending it to conform to a bill 
the committee approved Wednesday. 
The House bill is on the calendar 
awaiting action. 
" The House and Senate Public Service 

. Commission redistricting plans are 
similar except in one detail: 

The Senate plan leave the parishes 
of St. Bernard and Plaquemines in the : 
2nd District of Commissioner George 
Ackel, making up a population deficit 
in the 1st District of Commissioner 
John Schwegmann by adding St. Tam- 
many Parish to it. Schwegmann has 
said he would prefer adding St. Ber- - 
nard and Plaquemines, but Ackel does 
not want to give them up. 

The House plan follows Schweg-’ 
mann’s wishes, giving him St. Bernard 
and Plaquemines, leaving: St. Tam- 
many where it is, in the 3rd District of 
Commissioner Louis Lambert. 

Nunez, who represents St. Bernard 
and Plaquemines in the Senate, urged 
the panel to leave the parishes in 
Ackel's district. Rep. Edward C. Sco- 
gin, R-Slidell, said St. Tammany resi- 
dents want to keep their district as it is 
now. 
The committee agreed with Scogin, 

voting 14-0 to amend the Senate bill to 
make it the same as the House version. 
If the House passes the bill with those 
amendments, the Senate is likely to 
reject them, throwing the issue into a 
conference committee. 

If the House passes its own bill, the 
Senate will have a chance to amend it. 
Either House action could come Fri- 
day. : 

Le 

  

18
61
9 

1o
qu
ia
no
N]
 

‘A
ep
ia
g 
a
 

- 
17

 
93
eq
 

‘| 
uo

no
ae

g 

  

EE 
Eh. oo : 

3 70S 

  

  

  

   



    

1981 ‘ ovember 6 N + ay Frid , Page 18 tion |   &ee 

8 i w 
EB 
S
)
 

2 = 

ume 
Item fr — 

~ Th 

 
 Issued Daily by The Times-Picayune Publishing Corp. Sint 

e States   
"Associate Editor, 
Associate Editor, Editorials 

"CHARLES A. FERGUSON .- 

    
News 

ASHTON PHELPS 

- MALCOLM FORSYTH 
' ASHTON PHELPS JR. 

2 ¥  
 

 
 

Presideat and Publisher 

  
  

  

EDITORIALS 

      “45-7 a1 3800 Howard Ave., New Orleans, La. 70140 .       

Ly 
I
i
)
 

" 
‘ 

A
 

A
 

E
R
 

A 
NN 

¥ 
X 

A
n
a
y
a
 

J 

r
r
 

a 
S
E
A
R
 

R
E
 

aR 
a
 

A
N
 

T
o
o
k
 

D
A
N
E
S
 

S
N
R
 
A
 

a 
A
 

A
 

A 
BE 
R
n
 

x 
A
R
E
T
E
 

A
N
 

A 
AE 

N
Y
 

N 
bis 

i 
~ 

D
A
 

S
M
A
I
 

0 
F
a
t
a
 
S
R
R
 

R
S
 
A
T
R
 

$n 
= 

Me 
AAA 

ON 
I
M
A
M
I
A
A
L
L
 LE 

15 
vn 

—
—
—
—
—
 

N
B
A
 

R
W
 

\ 
R
A
N
 

N
P
 

SAN 
RA 

N
Y
 

» 
ike 

R IN 

e
e
 

RRR 
R
N
 

S
N
E
 

: 
RE 

D 
R
M
I
T
)
 

CR 
H
R
R
 

M
E
L
O
N
 

AAR 

I
W
S
 

AWN 
- 

T
I
R
E
 

S
e
 
T
o
 

we 
L
S
 

E
E
R
L
R
O
O
I
t
 es 
A
N
N
 
a
m
 

p
e
 

\ 
W
W
 

 
 

 
 

AN 
R
R
 
—
 

A
L
R
 S 

NAA 

r
e
 

R
R
R
 

—
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

T
R
 

b
r
e
 

 
 

 
 

  

 



  

  

  
-y 

i 

By JACK WARDLAW 
Capital bureau 
BATON ROUGE — The House dealt 

Gov. David C. Treen a stunning defeat 
Friday, rejecting his proposals for 
reapportioning the state’s congres- 
sional districts and adopting instead a 
Senate-backed plan. 

The plan the House approved creates 
a 2nd Congressional District in Orleans 
Parish with a black-population major- 
ity and a 1st District in which Jeffer- 
son Parish voters would make up an 
estimated 72 percent of the district 
total. 

After the vote, Treen issued a terse 
statement that, “Any bill in that form 
is unacceptable and without question 
will be vetoed.” 

That plan was approved by the Sen- 
ate Thursday but had been rejected by 
a House committee. It proved a lot 
more popular than expected on the 
House floor. pl 

“This plan is good for everybody,” 
_ said Rep. Mary Landrieu; D-New 
Orleans, “It’s good for the blacks, it’s 
good for the liberals, it’s good for Jef- 
ferson Parish. It'll keep them on their 
side of the line and out of our hair.” 

In the course of a debate that lasted 
more than two hours, the House voted 
51-47 to reject Treen’s “Proposal A,” a| 

i" plan that would have made little! 
. change in the existing districts; voted 
59-37 to substitute the Senate plan for 
it; and finally voted 62-37 to send the! 
revised bill to the Senate, where it is 
expected to get a friendly reception. 
inasmuch as the Senate gave an identi- | 

+ cal proposal a 30-6 vote of approval. 
Under the plan approved by the 

House Friday, the 2nd Congressional 
District would be composed of all of 
Orleans, except for part of Algiers. The’ 
district now is represented by Lindy 
Boggs of New Orleans. : 

The 1st Congressional District — 
“Where the incumbent is now U.S. Rep. 

Turn to Section 1, Page 4 

  

EIUVISTE 

it hye 

"Te 

  

-BATON ROUGE (UPI) — Spo- 
kesmen for two whose 
districts would be radically changed 
by a remapping plan gaining 
momentum in the Legislature, said 
Friday they oppose the proposal. 
The House redistricting plan drasti- 
cally alters the political turf of 
Republican Reps. Bob Livingston of 

Rouge. 
However, Rep. Lindy Boggs of 

New Orleans did not object to the 
Legislature’s proposal to give her 

+ 2nd District, which now has half of 
New Orleans and half of Jefferson 
Parish, a majority of black voters. 

“I certainly have no personal 
problem with it at all,” she said   

2 Louisiana congressmen :-| 
oppose redistricting plan |. 

- we'll wait ‘until the dust settles: 

Algiers and Henson Moore of Baton 

Treadwell said..“He’s just happy 

FY) 

“This plan has not passed and] = 

before we start worrying about that}! 
thing,” Livingston spokesman Dan |: 
Treadwell said in a telephone inter- "| 
yiew.. cnt dn en ieal 

A spokesman for Moore, who | 
would pick up Republican strong-'-|- 

holds in St. Tammany Parish, said. |.. 
he opposes splitting Baton Rouge, ar}! 
union and Democratic area, even:.{: 
though it would be to his politi 
cal advantage. weg. 

Livingston's political base would: |: 
be shifted from St. Tammany andi" 
New Orleans to Jefferson Parish. -..... 
_ “I'm not going to say he abso-™ 
lutely will not accept the plamili’d.- 

La ARN   
  

from her New Orleans home. with whatbe's got” 

  

  

  

  

Yagi Rd: res: 
ye .t . 

1% 10% "i! 

    

  

      

  

RL
 

W
E
T
 

~ 

  

  

      

     



  
  

  

  

  

  
  

  
  

  

Section 1, Page 4 Saturday, November 7, 1981 3 

  

  Brn 

~A’reen’s plan dumped 
'y Aoriinued from Page 1 

, Preiviasston of Algiers — would be 
. comjosed of all of West Jefferson 

except Grand Isle, all of East Jefferson 
except Kenner, about half of Algiers 
and all of St. Bernard and Plaquemines 
parishes. 

The plan also would have the effect 
of Rutting St. Tammany Parish — 
wifich now is part of the 1st District — 
inteethe 6th District, now represented 
by Henson Moore of Baton Rouge. 

Here is how New Orleans area mem- 
bers’ Yoted on final passage of the con- 
gressional reapportionment plan: 
For the bill, as amended to encom- 

pass the Senate plan: Reps. Alexander, 
Bajoie, Charbonnet, Connor, Heaton, 
Jacgbn, Johnson, Landrieu and Water- 

. meier, all of New Orleans; Alario, 
* Cusimano, Dastugue, D’Gerolamo, 

Guidry, Lancaster, Leithman and Ullo, 
all gf Jefferson; Accardo of St. John 

Cha Parish; Fernandez of St. Ber- 
nardiand Patti of Plaquemines. 

Against: Hainkel, Bagert, Bruneau, 
Carson, Faucheux, Gee and Schmitt, all 
of New Orleans; and Scogin and Strain 
of St.Tammany. 

ABjent or not voting: Byrnes of New 
Orleans and Bopp of St. Bernard. 
JIBe fight actually started an hour 

before the House convened, as the 
House and Governmental Affairs Com- 
mittge met to take up the Senate- 
passed bill. : 

~The governor had the votes in the 
committee, which proceeded to gut the 
Senate bill and replace it with Treen’s 
Proposal A. 

When the House Sonvened ‘Rep. John 
W. “Jock” Scott, D-Alexandria, chair- 
man of House and Governmental 
Affairs, began presenting the Senate 
bilkas amended.’ 

STtat drew a quick objection from 
Rep: «John A. Alario Jr., D-Westwego, 
who'said the bill's author, Sen. Samuel 
B:Nunez, D-Chalmette, has designated 
him’ as its floor manager. The point is 
important because under House rules, 
if the bill is sent to a conference com.’ 
mittee, the speaker must name its 

* floor manager to the six-member con- 
ference. ~E 

Placing Alario, on the couteranee 
. committee would have enabled him to 
vote with the Senate conferees for the 
Senate plan, something House Spester 
Jonad, Hainkel Jr. opposes. 

the Sepia Parish; Chaisson of St. 

After a huddle, Hainkel and Alario 
agreed that the House bill would be 
taken up instead of the Senate-passed 
‘measure. The House bill, at that point, 
embodied Treen’s Proposal B; a, plan 
that little affects the New Orleans area 
but makes extensive changes else- 
where in the state. 

Scott sought to amend the lan to 
encompass Treen’s Proposal A, consid- 
ered more acceptable i in the House. 

But the amendment ran into a buzz- 
saw of opposition. Alario said the [g 
administration was using “divide and |f 
conquer” 
votes with minor revisions of Proposal 
A. 

Rep. Diana. A. ' Bajoie, D-New 
Orleans, said “I don’t understand why 
the governor is determined to ignore 
the black citizens of this state.” 

Bajoie was asked if she liked Treen’s 
Proposal A better than his Proposal B. |¥ 
“It’s like going from the skillet to the 
pan,” she said. “It’s hot both places.” 

Rep. V.J. Bella, D-Berwick, objected 
to Treen's plan to split St. Mary Par- 
ish. “Once you divide my parish, I have 

"no more stroke. I don’t want two con- 
gressmen,” he said. 

When the House tried to vote on 
Scott’s amendment, the electronic vot- 
ing machine broke down and a roll call | § 
vote was taken. To the surprise of [E:A~> 
many, Treen’s plan was rejected 51-47. 

Alario then moved in for the kill, 
" bringing the Senate plan to a quick 
vote. With the tide now running his 
way, it passed 59-37. The House then 
gave the bill final approval 62-37. 

Alario then tried to bring to a vote 
the bill already passed by the Senate. |; 
Had he amended it back into the form 
in which the Senate passed it, the mea- 
sure would have gone straight to the 
governor without any further legisla- 
tive action. j 3 

But House members were restive, 

and they rejected a move to take up 
Senate bills. Alario then had the Senate 
bill made special order of the day 
Monday. 

Legislators on both sides predicted 
the administration will turn on the lob- 
bying steam over the weekend, hoping 

.to salvage some kind of a compromise. 
Treen is adamantly opposed to the Sen- 
ate plan, reportedly because he fears it 
would cause the political demise of 
Republican Rep. Livingston. 

  

    

              

eto 
The Times-Picayune /% 

  

  
tactics, trying to pick up (B: 

  

  

  

  

      
  

   



. | 

  
  

  

Wednesday, November 11, 1981 Section 1, Page 13 
  i 

ERECT IEEE E UTE SRR SE AP) 

  

  

EE SRT of 

Loe ans 
Hh 

? 
1 

  

THE TIMES-PICAYUNE /7-THE ATELIER 
  

» a.m.”   

Jown in basement, | 
, New districts nee up 

By JACK WARDLAW 
Capital burean 
BATON ROUGE. — State Senate 

leaders said late Tuesday they were 
very close” to an agreement with 
Gov. David C. Treen's administration: 
and Louisiana's congressmen on the 
explosive issue of reapportioning the 
state's eight congressional districts. 

“We've been meeting since 8:30 
said Sen. Samuel B. Nunez, D- 

Chalmette, shortly before 6 p.m. “I 
think we're about to get it worked 
out.” 

Meeting in the Senate offices in the’ 
Capitol sub-basement were senators, 
several congressmen, aides to Treen 
and representatives of others. 

Their aim was to resolve differences 
on congressional reapportionment 
between Treen and the Senate, led by 
Nunez. while satisfying the eight 
incumbent congressmen who will have 
to run in the districts in 1982. 

Since the special legislative session 
started last week, a tug-of-war has 
been fought between the administra- 

tion. which wants to leave the congres- 
sional districts much as they are, .and 
the Senate, which has insisted on a 
Nunez proposal that would provide a 
black-majority district in New Orleans 
and another district dominated by Jef- 
ferson Parish. 

The Nunez plan has passed the 
House and Senate at different times 
during the session, but Treen has 
declared he will veto it if it reaches his 
desk. 

Details of the plan that was report- 
edly near approval at Tuesday's 
closed-door session were sketchy, but 
Nunez said it likely will do the follow- 
ing: ) FE mr 

— Leave the 1st District of Republi- 
can U.S.’ Rep. Bob Livingston ‘of 

Algiers much as it is but minus much 
of its present black population. - + 

, — The 3rd District of Democrat W.J. 
“Billy” Tauzin of Thibodaux wauld 
pick up even more of Metairié than if 
contains at present. Jefferson Parish 

district. 

PN
 
E
e
 

S
R
 

IE 

- The 2nd District of Seri 
Rep. Lindy Boggs of New Orleans 
would become a Jefferson-majority 
district, but also would gain more 
black voters from Jefferson. : 

The remaining hang-ups appeared to 
be just how large the Jefferson and 
black percentages in District 2 would 

The. negotiations were continuing 
late Tuesday in an effort to get a plan. 
before the Legislature Wednesday that 
can be approved so the Legislature 
can adjourn. Senate President Michael 
H. O'Keefe, D-New Orleans, said he 
hopes to wind up the session by 

i Wednesday evening, four days ahead of 
} schedule. Most of the other busihess 

was completed Tuesday. . 
The atmosphere was" “far diffetent 

: late Tuesday from what it was on Mon- 
‘ day, when the ‘House- and Senate 
* appeared at loggerheads on the gon- 

; gressional remap issue and some were 
. predicting either a new special sedion 

now makes up about 42 percent of the 
"Tors to next pase 

mei tease ody kit 

   



  

    

    
    

  

      
  

  

  

  

yl +4 
ie 

- Compromise brewing 
[a | 1 Est 

Continued from Page 13 hes AY 

to deal with it. or holding. the matter. 
for attention when the. ‘Legislature ¢ or 
venes for its regulars session in “April, 

On Monday, the House peed, dh 
same Nunez plan. it bad apg ued the. 
previous Friday. That shouid- ave wri 
the matter to a oalptence ommit 

ay slippe 
without is being waged. or 

Neithér O'Keefe 1 not Hotise. Speaker | 
John J. Hainkel, D-New Orleans, exer- 
cised his right to name his three con- 
ferees, leaving the reapportionment 
issue in limbo. But O'Keefe and Hain , 
kel apparently were aware of the" 
negotiations going on in the Senate 
sub-basement;. and did nqt want: to 
bring the matter toa head too early)" 5 

The only definite action taken on 
congressional reappottionment Tues-,. 
day was by the Senate and Gavernmen-, 

  

  

tal A airs Committee, ‘which at’ 
0 Keefe’s_ request took the bill“ the 

" Houge passed. Friday and’ sent it to 
“he floor without debate. * : 

O'Keefé Wanted the bill on the Sen 
te’ ny So. agreement is 

ied qissenier velngs 
Saupdets, D-Mamou, who said he 
objected to being kept waiting to act on 

a strictly procedural matter. 
. Among those milling about the Capi- 

' tol as the drama was played out behind 
‘the scenes was former Gov. Edwin W. 
Edwards, who said he was staying out . | 

- of. the reapportionment controversy. 
“¥ Edwards was" asked if he planned A Bh 
submit a plan of his own. “This is not a: 
good. year. for governors to submit 

4 ‘reapportiopment plans,” he replied. Pa 

- - 
et -  m al S 7 PE 

  

  

    
  

    

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
    

  
  

   



INE 
| [72 GA SL ea A ey) fo 

Bt nde! we ONO oT ey MINER 
9 INT of | 

  
  

  

  

  

"WEATHER 

FAIR THURSDAY becoming partly cloudy at 
night and winds from the northeast at ptol0 
mph is the National Weather Service forecast. 
High Thursday, upper 60s; low, mid 60s. High 
Wednesday, 73; low, 55. Map, details, Sec. 2, 
Poged, of iotdivan = To ah ie 

  

    
  

il 

  "THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 1, J931 80 Ae A SR AI YS aes 3 
Ha   

  

  

  

  
  

RE RRA RL ares adlf ann: ER ll ye Ry oF at 

By JACK WARDLAW 75 477 “Black lawmakers appearing in oppo-. | Capital bureau . ~~ ~~", "~’-"2Y" sition to the compromise ‘were Sen.. " 1. : : Henry E. Braden IV, D-New.Orleans, 5 BATON ROUGE —' Despite strong i. Ti dh nan ff .. objections’ from black lawmakers, a: and Reps. Diana A.'Bajoie and Johnny... oy + Jackson Jr., D-New Orleans. Braden - oint House-Senate conference commit-. yo 2 i) p ro. or late Wednesday approved a com- called the Blan patently unconstity-, 4 ‘promise plan for redrawing Louisi- ORAL", “0 Tyr fied yin ana’s eight congressional districts, 
« The black spokesmen opposed the: 

  
“Tell me any place in this country a, y 

. black can get elected in a district that” 

plan because it fails to create a black-: i iS °0ly 38 percent black,” said Bajoie. + --* “The only: thing this compromise . 
». compromises’ is the’ black citizens io 
.¢:New Orleans,” said Jackson, -ij* CoE oe 
The special legislative session was: | 

expected to end Thursday once the con. * 44.7 

majority district in New Orleans, a 
longtime Black Caucus goal. % 

The plan still needs approval from 
the full House and Senate before going 
to Gov." David C. Treen. Earlier {| gressional matter is resolved. :,°, ,.,- .. Wednesday, Treen’ issued a statement Wo St ham ATs <4 pn ; » * The compromise was hammered out saying he can.sign the plan, though he- "during the Era Tuesday at a meeting “said he still preferred the plans he sub- -.. in the Senate subbasement amgeg Tepy] 

{ "The six-member conference commit: Zi resentatives of the: congressional * “"tee approved, the plan by a 4-2 vote. , delegation, the, governor 4 od Jods! : a / Ave lenders yi trend fi 5 * Voting yes were Sens. Michael H. +i Action on the plan was held up ear--, 

Hutson, D-Bato Rouge Somer: Fler Wesiay beck Toe aay 
| Nunez, D-Chalmette; ‘and Rep. Emile giving it final approval, reportedly: “Peppi” Bruneau, Ind.-New Orlea ns. +. because he objected to his home PT 

cinct in Metairie being in the district of .." .: Voting no were Reps. John W. a : a “4 Jock": Scott: D-Alexan dria, and Jobn 2nd District Rep. Lindy Boggs, a Dem- | 8 A. Alario Jr., D-Westwego ocrat: But. Treen's office later denied ~. | 
| ~~ Nunez, who pushed all session for a that was the hangup, and late Wednes- *'}." 

. Plan of his own that created a black- 
..-.day afternoon the governor issued a majority and a Jefferson-majority dis- ' ‘statement saying that while he per- 

trict, said he was accepting the com- 
* ferred other plans, the compromise." 

. promise because “Treen had vowed to ” was Within, the parameters of what he vetohisplan,” “= «= tL pnd #4 : 
Hh .. could sign. -: *-, ri lh 

“This is better than no plan at all”. Treen earlier said he’ would veto. ¥ 
+ Nunez said. ea . a plan by Sen. Samuel B. Nunez, D- 

: : w Chalmette, that created a lack-major- Scolt disagreed, saying that “it does Vity district in New a a Jef- is ao gond fo Send the governor a plan - ferson Parish-dominated Ist District, ~ he will sign if it is going to be ruled 
invalid by the courts.” + - =. vos 

Scott contended that the failure to 
provide a black district will doom the 

"plan with the U.S. Justice Department 
.,.and the courts. He proposed an alter-’ 

native providing a district 50.2 percent 
black in‘New Orleans, but it was voted 
down 5-1. Nt (RRS 

Alario said he was voting against 
the compromise out of loyalty to his 

y allies in the House in the effort to get - 
“the Nunez plan passed ET Nie a 

1a Sars 

" ..mitted to the Legislature.” ; 

Re PERL To TT Satna h] 

  

: The compromise plan contains. no 
.. black majority district but it does give 
* Jefferson Parish a majority in District 

2. Here is a rundown on its effects on 
the New Orleans area: 

   



    

  

  

, Continued from Page 1 dy 
~ front, but would Jose black precincts in the 9th and 7th Wards and would dip . through the City Park area into the University section to pick up large © numbers of white voters there. *. The new district would be 68 per- “ cent white and 62 percent of its voters would live in New Orleans. : Boggs’ District 2 would keep West * Jefferson and most of East Jefferson south of Interstate 10. In New Orleans, + it would lose the University section and + keep a wide belt of mostly black areas . along the river from around Jefferson Avenue all the way through the French ‘Quarter and into the 9th Ward. ; It would keep the Carrollton area, but within Orleans that would not con- . Dect with the rest of the 2nd District : except through Jefferson Parish, being cut off by the University Section. ; 

Rep. W.J. Tau: 
d keep its pres. 
and the part of 
of I-10, some 

ent Acadiana parishes 
East Jefferson north 
161,000 Jefferson voters who would §; make up about 31 percent of the new fg district. . Le 
Nunez told the conference commit- tee he would have preferred to have kept his plan with a black-majority and a Jefferson-majority district, but “the governor would have vetoed it and we would have wound up with no plan atall” -. 

: 

Jefferson Parish Assessor Lawrence E. Chehardy echoed his sentiments, fg saying that “it would be 2 disaster for the Legislature to leave with no con- gressional plan.” = aaa, Scott said the lack of a black dis- 

  

  

BEE hi RS iii fiers a he = 

  

The district would be 445 percent “trict is “purely political.” 

= li AD 3 ERE See aL “He . somadn whe iM g (4 Dannt¥t ss ae § 
9s 3 Lr a en 3 itt Jain 

  

          

 



  

  

  

    

‘will meet court approval 
New districts o5tlived, Paper 29 

. By JACK WARDLAW 
Capital bureas - 
BATON ROUGE — The Megidivie 

Thursday sent Gov. David C. Treen a 
congressional redistricting plan that 
the governor believes will meet the 

~ approval of the U.S. Justice Depart- 
ment and the federal courts. 

Both houses voted to ratify a confer- 
ence committee compromise reappor- 
tioning Louisiana’s eight congressional 
districts. 

But in a last-ditch effort to get the * 
Legislature to scuttle the plan, nearly 
every black lawmaker took the floor to 
denounce the proposal and vaw to fight 
it in the courts. ’ 

“This is patently unconstitutional, ”i 
said Sen. Henry E. Braden IV, D-New 
Orleans, arguing that the Legislature 
should have created a- black-majority 
district in New Orleans. 

“It means that some federal judge i 
will be drawing the plan,” said Rep. 3x 
Charles Jones, D-Monroe. 

Treen said at a news conference that jas Sai 
he couldn't disagree more. 

“I feel very confident that the plan 
will meet Justice Deport ang fed- 

’ 

  

Nis Hh 

el Rie 

5 <k >. hed J 

  

  

. eral court review,” said Treen. “I don’t 
think it is attackable on racial grounds 
at all.” 

Treen said he has had “nformal 
communications” with. the Justice 
Department on the matter but refused 
to answer questions about those: con- 
tacts. 

vened for the session’s final day Thurs- . 
day morning was that the conference 
committee report, approved by a 4-2 
vote late Wednesday night, was up for 

« approval by both houses. Had either 
house rejected it, either a new confer- 
ence committee would have had to 
convene or congressional redistricting 

3 

would have: bisa dead for the-seasion. 
: The House took up:the matter frst)” 
debating. it for more. than-an. bour.., 
before: voting 65-27 to approve it. ° 
Black” lawmakers. took’ turns: ha 

“ ouncing the plan and predicted ity 
demise in the courts: The legislative . 

_ Black Caucus had been part of a coaliv- 
The situation as the Lagislaiore con- 

tion behind the “Nunez Plan,” named 
for its principal backer, Sen. Samuel B. . 

*Nurez; D-Chalmette;.it would have 
created a 2nd District: composed of 
most of New Orleans, with a 54° .per- 
cent black population. That plan”also 
would have created a ko Lo 
Ist District in which. Republican ol 

“Tarn to Section Pages: 

  

          

  

    
    

    

        

    

  

  

pep W 

    : ali ik 43: 
  

th ri a 

  
  

  
   



    

  

  
SAT ie 

TARE BT EE — 

Tteen says ¢ LANL Ts { 3 
3 Continued from Pagel ., 

mr 

* 
i > 4 

Bob Livingston of Algiers would have faced 
a 72 percent Jefferson majority. \ 

In the face of Treen's pledge to vetd 
such a plan, Nunez'and other proponents of 

-the plan agreed to accept. the compromise, 
-and Nunez helped lead the fight for its 
“approval atthe conference committee. : 

Black legislators picked up some support, 
but not enough: The Orleans delegation split 
10-7 against the compromise, but the Jet- 
ferson délegation split 7-3 for it. ; 

Rep.” Mary Landrieu, D-New Orleans, 
said she feared it'would cause New Orleans 
to lose control of at least one of its con- 
gressmen and perhaps both over the course 

20f the next decade. : . 
¢ Here is how New Orleans area House 
g members voted -on final approval of the 
picompromise: - HE, Si > 
+, . For: Hainkel, Bagert, Bruneau, .Byrnes, 
Carson, Gee and Schmitt, all of Orleans; 
Cusimano, Dastugue, D'Gerolamo, Guidry, 
Grisbaum, Lancaster and Ullo, all of Jet- 
ferson; Patti of Plaquemines, and Scogin 

  

and BW in of & Timmany, 

» . 
’ » 

  

  

Against: Alexander, Bajoie, Charbonnet, 
Connor, Faucheux, Héaton, Jackson, John- 
son, Landrieu and Watermeier, all of 
Orleans; Alario, Doucet and Leithman of 
Jefferson; Chaisson of St. Charles; Accardo 
of St. John the Baptist; Fernandez of St. 
Bernard. 

Absent or not voting: Bopp of St. Ber- 
nard. 
‘The Senate took only a few minutes to 

dispose of the matter. Nunez urged the Sen- 
ate to accept the compromise, Braden 
argued against it, and the Senate voted 25- 
10 to ratify the conference report. 

Here is how New Orleans area sena- 
tors voted: : 

For: Casey, Hickey, Windhorst and’ 
O'Keefe of Orleans; Lauricella, Nicholson 
and Tiemann of Jefferson; Rayburn and 
Dykes of St. Tammany; Landry of St. John 
the Baptist; Nunez of St. Bernard. 

Against: Braden and Jefferson of 
Orleans. : Gr, 

Absent or not voting: Kiefer of Orleans. 
Under the plan, Livingston's new 1st.Dis- 

trict is 68 percent white and 62 percent of 

i 

  

    
  

ourt will OK remap plan 
The new 2nd District of Democratic Rep. 

Lindy Boggs of New Orleans is 44.5 percent 
black and 56 percent of its residents live in 
Jefferson. The new 3rd District of Demo- 
cratic Rep. W.J. Tauzin of Thibodaux would 
have 31 percent Jefferson residents. 

". Treen said neither he nor his staff parti- |§:. cipated in the negotiations drafting the [5 
compromise. Some participants in the 
closed-door session Tuesday night implied 
to newsmen that aides to Treen and Living- 
ston were being consulted. 

Livingston and Republican Rep. Henson |: 
Moore of Baton Rouge told the Washington 

" bureau of The Times-Picayune, The States- 
Item that they and their aides played a role 
in nudging the governor on the one hand 
and the Democrats in the delegation on the xi 

, other toward a compromise. 
Treen said the first time he saw the '! 

compromise plan was late Tuesday and | 
that he decided early Wednesday to accept ! 

-it. He then issued a statement to that 
effect. : 

The governor said he still thinks hic"Pro- | 

iN 

  

    

 



  

  

  

  

    

  

EDITORIALS 
i 

  

  

  4 

ad. adn ih 
SRA EL, 

  

  

4 4 

NI 

The redistricting dance 
fy nieve 

I. 

The special session of the Legislature has 
done its special duty — redrawing the districts 
served by the state’s congressional delegation, 
its legislators and its Public Service Commis- " 
sion members — but there will clearly be more 
to it than that. According to the federal Voting 

Gov. David Treen says he thinks the plan will 
pass federal muster, but if it is taken to court it 
could be some time before final'judgment.. 

The patchwork the Legislature stitched 
together for the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Congressional 
Districts does not argue well for the Legisla-   Rights Act of 1963, the plan must be approved 

oy'the U.S. Justice Department, and black leg- 
slators are expected to mount a court chal- 
ienge. : 

The major area of change was South Louisi-’ 
ina, where the 1980 census showed a con- 
Jinuing rise in population. And to the inevitable 
sul on redistricters to preserve the political 
sharacter of individual districts (and with it, 
inevitably, the political security of their incum- 
cents). is added the push to increase the politi- 
:al power of black voters. Black legislators 

ture as reapportioner. GOP Rep. Robert 
Livingston’s 1st District was rammed into the... 
middle of Democratic Rep. Lindy Boggs’ 2nd - 
District, dividing Uptown and isolating Carroll- 
ton. Jefferson Parish, instead of getting a distr 
ict ail or almost all its own, is still divided, 
though it becomes the majority in the new 2nd — 
District. Four redrawn legislative districts: 
wound up with two incumbents, ... - « ow ov 
Without impugning the honor and responsibi- a 

lity of legislators — or councilmen when redis- """ 
-tricting —' there would seem to be a built-in.... 

caring 

urgue that black voters have been 
rift. hey a : 
New black-majority legislative districts were 

rreated — a senate district, in Baton Rouge and 
louse districts in Shreveport and the River 
’arishes. But black legislators argued that 
here should have been’ three mors * the 
specially sought-after black-majority cor eres- 

No 

¢ 
{ 

a 

ional district for New Orleans was reizoiod. be 

given short; conflict of interest in an elective’ bedy’s draw-.. 
ing the districts in which its incumbent mem" 
bers will be seeking re-election. Fifteen states 
now have some form of redistricting commis- 
sions or agencies or advisory mechanisms. 
Their recommendations must still be approved 
by their legislatures, but in most cases it is 
little more than a pro forma exercise. It might 
ce werth looking into. : 2 Ie J    



“% labeled a disappointment. 

  

Sunday. November §3, 1981 

  

Section 1, Page 39 5 
  
  

Dig 

  

  

COLUMNS 
  

  

Remap 
By JACK WARDLAW 

- Capital bureau 

BATON ROUGE — After all the 

tumult.and the shouting, the result of 

the months-long controversy over con- 

gressional reapportionment has to be 

It's a disappointment to those who 

hoped we could come out with neat, 

well-drawn districts that are fair to all 

concerned. 

it’s no disappointment to the incum- 

bent congressmen, all of whom wound 

up with districts that are unlikely to 

give them any problems when they 

seek re-election next year. But if that 

wore the goal of the reapportionment 

process, it could have been done much 

hetter by having the governor and Leg- 

islature accept the first proposal the 

delegation submitted back in May. 

It’s only a minor disappointment to 

Jefferson Parish leaders, who wound 

up with a large enough share of the 2nd 

Congressional District to have an 

excellent chance of electing semebody 

in it when the present incumbent, 

Democrat Lindy Boggs of New 
Orleans, steps down. They wanted, of 
course, a district with all or nearly all 

of the parish united in'it. . 
It’s a major disappointment to black 

leaders, who wanted a black-majority 

district in New Orleans. They didn’t get 

« it. And in an attempt to give them half 

a loaf, the remappers tortured the map 

H of New Orleans unmercifully to try 
to cram as many blacks as possible 

into District 2. They came out with 

only 44.5 percent, not enough to give 

the biacks much hope of electing a con- 

gressman, but enough to create a dis- 

trict that looks awful on the map and 

effectively dilutes black influence in 

the neighboring 1st District. 

* It’s hard to justify bringing the 1st 

: District of Republican Rep. Robert 

© Livingston of Algiers into the univer- 

“Zi sity section, once the heart of the 2nd 
District, cutting the Uptown area in 

two and leaving Carrollton isolated 

from the rest of District 2's Orleans 

portion. 

All that was truly unnecessary. 

You're either creating a black district 

or you aren't. If you aren't, the best 
- a 

LOUISIANA POLITICS 
  

thing you could do for the blacks is to 

a disappointment. _ 
give them strong influence 
tricts instead of ope. 1 I WaT 

. Outside the New Orleans area, the: 

“rest of the state's districts don’t’ look 
too bad, except that opportunities to 
make District 8 more compact were 
passed up. For no particularly good 
reason, the district now leaps across 
the Mississippi River to pick up a 
small chunk of Baton Rouge that is not 
contiguous with the rest of the district 

except across that natural geographic 
barrier. It is a strictly political cut. 

There were much simpler and more 
- sensible solutions to the redistricting 

in two dis- 

~ House was all about. 
BE a a 

Treen and the 
Republicans left 

themselves cpen to 
attack hy earlier 
trying to monkey 

with the districts of 
Democrats Gillis 
Long, Billy Tauzin 
and Sohn Breaux. 
PE a 

puzzle. One of the earlier delegation 

plans, or Gov. David C. Treen’s Pro- 

posal A, could have been chosen if you 

weren't going to create the black-- 

majority or all-Jefferson districts. - 

Left to itself, the Legislature would 

doubtless have chosen the “Nunez 

Plan” (for Sen. Samuel B. Nunez, D- 

Chalmette), which would have created 

the black-majority and nearly all-Jei- 

ferson districts. But in the face of 

Treen's veto threat, it was abandoned 

by nearly everybody, including Nunez. 

From his viewpoint, Treen’s use of 

the veto club to beat back the Nunez 

Plan was necessary to keep fellow 

Republican Livingston from being 

thrust into a district in which 80 per- 

cent of his constituents would have 

been new to him. 
» fA TE — 

  

RR 

} tou 

abi 

: Sh oe tani BS TY 

The Legislature had no particular... 
reason to want to destroy Livingston 

who has obviously been doing his job ta... 

the satisfaction of his present comsti<~- 

* tuents. But Treen and the Republicans. 

left themselves open to attack by ear: 

lier trying to monkey with the districts 
of Democrats Gillis Long, Biily Tauzin 

and John Breaux to sbvious GOP 
advantage. : 

Those efforts, embodied in Treen, 
Proposals B and C, got justifiably wal- 
loped in the legislative process, But“! 

they provoked a counterattack whose 
victim would have been Livingston. 

That is what the anti-Treen vote Nov. § 

in the normally pro-administration 
/ 

ATH 

By bumbling around with three plans 

instead of trying to build a majority’. 
around Proposal A, the administration 

forced the resourceful Jefferson Parish 
delegation into @ coalition with thg™ 

blacks and the incumbent Democratic . 

congressmen behind the Nunez Pla.’ 
When. those votes were added up, the 

administration had to spend the rest of. 

the session scrambling for cover, ard’ 

only the last-minute compromise saved 
its face. =: Jf HR J iT ta 

The compromise was worked out it 

the Senate sub-basement by several) 

congressmen and their aides, Jeiferson 

Parish Assessor Lawrence E. Che.” 
hardy, Senate leaders and AFL-CIO ™ 

President Victor Bussie. This writer .. 

was misinformed when he reported’, | 

that aides to the governor were pres- ., 

ent. If there was any contact with the" 

administration, it seems to have been . 

through aides to Livingston or Republi=", 

can Rep. Henson Moore of Baton A 

Rouge. . i a 

The compromise is the plan we arg 

stuck with, unless the Justice Depart: ~ 

ment or the courts throw it out — 7 

distinct possibility. ; Ga 

We are stuck with it no thanks to the” 
administration and the many interest . 

groups who hoped to come out of the. 

reapportionment process with some: 

thing to their advantage. Lm 

Reapportionment is like what some: , 

one (Mark Twain, I think) once said 

about litigation — if you go into it a.> 
pig, you come out a sausage. 

J 

ht 

big 
wlth 

      

    
  

 



APPENDIX 3 

Nunez Plan 

 



  

nls RT 
i
 

w
e
,
 

H
e
i
s
e
n
 

L
a
 

© Fed 

-— 

Lu] 
Las 

1 | 
oatantasaddd 

e
T
 

—
 

CI 
f
r
 

CL. 
1. T

T
I
 

w
t
 

it 
o
o
 

 
 

3
 Lal] 

Lut 

ILI 

Jew] 

ILI    
 

    
 
 

I
I
 

p
p
s
 

| | 

IiCn 

w
o
n
 

ond 
vor) 
flossmel] 

fled 

m
n
 , 

' 
oss 

iil 
| 

m
o
m
 

11H] 

1. I == 

11 1 Wi 

Es 

| 
== i 

 



of : ? NEN NN PERV SE VI V I TOT TATA TAY 

0 Wg 
 — pa LRA PARISI WARD BOUNDARIES 

. ny IN 

  

SCALE IN MILES       

  

  

    
    

  

  

  

INSERT 

Ji o TI 

\ Vik        



PLAN : PROPOSAL B DISTRICT ETHNIC TOTALS AND REGISTERED VOTERS DATE 1 November 4, 1981 PILE 8 STATE SENATE 
PAGE t 1 

TOTAL WHITE BLACK AM, INDXAN ASIAN/PI OTHER SPANISH QrI DISTRICT TOT VOTERS WHITE VOTERS BLACK VOTERS 

526,666 419,996 ) 1,879 
220,036 191,192 > 13.0% 

525,138 230,855 ; 283,506 54,0% 490 
229,007 129,408 99,579 43,54 

525,501 404,952 111,834 21.3% 4,920 
249,598 202,585 ; 46,954 18.8% 

525,067 352,076 6 165,978 31.6% 1,704 
219,307 170,223 48,984 22.3% 

527,656 360,705 163,860 31,1% 658 
249,768 188,260 61,108 24,5% 

525,074 399,576 119,493. 22.0% 181 
263,773 217,589 2,5] 46,184 117.5% 

523,847 415,313 104,676 20.0% 
270,601 225,240 45,343 16.8% 

524,943 327.770. 6 193,810 36.9% 
253,836 176,851 3 76,983 30,3% 

 



DISTRICT VARIANCE REPORT 
PLAN: PROPOSAL B DATE: November 4, 1981 
FILE: STATE SENATE PAGE: 
IDEAL DISTRICT POPULATION 525,497 

DIST. NUMBER TOTAL POP, % DIST. VARIANCE POP, DIFFERENCE 
Ll EE Rl vy i —— 

526,666 0.22 1,170 
525,138 -0.07 359 
525,581 0.02 85 
525,067 -0,08 430 
527,656 0.41 2,160 
525,074 -0.08 423 
523,847 -0.31 1,650 
524,943 -0.11 554 D

L
O
 

DA
 
W
K
N
 

STATE AVERAGE VARIANCE 0,16% 

STATE OVERALL POPULATION VARIANCE 0.72% 
ea lL Lk LE YY iy pppp—p——— 

IDEAL DIST. POP. 

% DIST, VARIANCE 
% AVERAGE VARTANCE 

% OVERALL POP VAR, 
(x¥ NOT 

STATE PUP, / NUMRER OF DISTRICTS 

(DIST. POP, = TOFAL DIST, POP.) / IDEAL DIST, POP, 

(SUM OF DIST. VARIANCES) / NUMBER OF DISTRICTS 

(HIGHEST PUP, = LOWEST DIST, POP,)/IDEAL DIST, POP, 

£3  */° CHARACTER MEANS *LIVIDED BY’) 

w
a
n
u
u
 

m 

 



PLAN PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT 1 November 4, 1981 
FILE:STATE SENATE PISTRICT TOTAL: 526,666 PAGE 4 

SE EN nO en ED SSD SP Se GE 0 GR GD DS GE ee Se Se ED BR UR GP G6 WS YE SS Ge ER GE HS SE SN SS SO Be ED KP OU GE SU Be We ue EB 

JEFFERSON PARISH 

WARD LLL BE BIE BL 32,111 

WARD Pe 0 eee ePR POON OIEGTOIEOOSELDS 16,599 

WARD ees es csssvevsccnnse 217.053 

WARD P90 00 SOBRE ILLOePe 73,844 

WARD @eCs0ecce0s0seevRee 23,890 

WARD CECI RCC RE AEE BN NC IAI BC IE BC) 4,480 

WARD 

PRECINCT Ss es0eeerevccvscssnese 644 

PRECINCT LBL BB BE BE BL BEB BE BE BE BN BE BN BN 447 

PRECINCT © 0 0 PPO OER IOS REBSTOIEDRPe 1,361 

PRECINCT Secs eeseevsevscesene 1,609 

PRECINCT eeessescesscasaccsss 1,006 
PRECINCT ® O80" 00s POO IPOS EPNNSD 565 

PRECINCT Seo eesesessvsensen 992 

PRECINCT ® © 08 0 POSE NPE BES POPEDN 624 

PRECINCT LL BE BL BEB BE BE BE BL BE BL BE BE BN I BE BN J 3,232 

PRECINCT LBL BE BE OE BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BL BY BE BE BN AN J 659 

PRECINCT ® 9 90 0S OP NOVO ENSSS EDS 199 

PRECINCT CO Os OOO LLCLOGIIOREOSIOIONOS 1,375 

PRECINCT @® eve nsvesssescsesaes 531 

PRECINCT Seo cscssvssscnvecnrvae 920 

PRECINCT ® 9 O09 OP OSV OOS OS SOON 1,113 

8 

PRECINCT cecsscscssnssscsssss 1,054 
PRECINCT Se emeces secs cnce 121) 

PRECINCT eo es eves ecsecsesnsre 1,246 

PRECINCT So ese vevetsesessneen 1,750 

PRECINCT esceccscscscscsvnssense 622 

PRECINCT cecsesccscvtesnronses 817 
PRECINCT LAL BL BL BE BE BE BE BE BE BE BLE BBN BLE BEN J 815% 

PRECINCT ® SOP 60908 SOP POSSI PEDN 974 

PRECINCT PO eevee sssPseLvLeee ed 1,039 

PRECINCT ® 9 0 PO OOS ss ss Sesser 999 

PRECINCT Ove vssesressav9eso 1,391 

PRECINCT y ® © 98 09S ev EB SSRIS 919 

PRECINCT csescccsensssncsncce 2,188 

PRECINCT : secs esnccsvecssspance 1,099 
PRECINCT esevsecccccsssnsssse 1,134 
PRECINCT cvesscessssseecscess 1,270 
PRECINCT cesessecevesccssscsse 633 
PRECINCT @P veers cosvrey 1,040 

PRECINCT eesessssssssesvssees 2,106 
PRECINCT Seessvessccscssanses 3,869 
PRECINCT ®s ev e008 sere vassn 1,191  



PLANIPROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGHEDL TU DISTRICT 1 November 4, 19861 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 526,666 PAGE 2 

J eked daddies 
J Ll hela dadsfiadhadiadiad ppp Lr Ce EE 

JEFFERSON PARISH CONTINDED= 

PRECINCT 31 ee essences csseee ie 1,249 

PRECINCT 32 PEE EEE EEE I Bd 5.823 

PRECINCT 3) esos cee OVIONOISOSIORITS 1,120 

PRECINCT 34 eee vescssssesseese 
1,487 

PRECINCT 34 eecesgvecvssvcasensee 
1,909 

PRECINCT 36 PEPPY AC IC I BL 1,116 

PRECINCT 37 sessessssssacsncnses 2,114 

PRECINCT 38 eee s esses BecssoRsere 1,855 

PRECINCT 39 escsssessssssasccnacs 943 

PRECINCT 40 ees sss eacscssrencnssns 
3,151 

PRECINCT 41 YY YEE EEN EEE EEA A 741 

PRECINCT 12 ecco vss esos cavesacs 986 

PRECINCT 43 esseeassssscssecsvroe 1,53) 

PRECINCT 44 eevecsseccsesvscsesvee 1,176 

PRECINCT 45°  eeseessvecccsssssaes 1,466 

PRECINCT 46 cece s senses ssssoy es 20222 

PRECINCT 41 esse vecssseeeRsNO
OaL 1,099 

PRECINCT 48 Sd cnvsnasessenesens 3,152 

PRECINCT 49 escesssssesssscscene 1,514 

PRECINCT 50 desde srs ven syne Fpl 6S 

WARD 9 
PRECINCT 1 esesssecvssoanscnes

 1,015 

PRECINCT 
1K ess seecsscessssOecR

IS 2:2%% 

PRECINCT 2 PEY EEE EEC I Bd 2,044 

PRECINCT 
2A ese vescseccesss

essel 504 

PRECINCT 
2K ees ecscssesocssc

easacs 1,846 

PRECINCT 
3 PPP CIC ICRC BLA I 2.581 

PRECINCT 3A Parararararer a I I I CICA BCI IE JR J 4 3,238 

PRECINCT 3B SN dens enensrnveee Teli] 

PRECINCT 
3C eceessecscssssves

ssace 1,955 

PRECINCT 3D SE CAR ST 656 

PRECINCT IE a ET a TUR 

PRECINCT Ky as osnsviis serene rne Y4612 

PRECINCT 3G PPT EEE EE EEE NE AA 2,548 

PRECINCT 3H ER urea a 

PRECINCT 317 ase cevieyssesssens vs 1,025 

PRECINCT 3K Se ese neta an ee sumed 657 

PRECINCT 4K ee cunbs seid onnne 3,062 

PRECINCT 5K SOFT I eg, Re TL 

PRECINCT 6K ce vanbvisseennsrnrve. i 19505 

PRECINCT TK essays sense cures: 24590 

PRECINCT BK esses ess seve seserse 
1,318 

PRECINCT 9K ee es es srs sr esvaose 2,606 

PRECINCT 10A IE PT CRINGE) TL EE 

PRECINCT 108 Fo ee NT Re RE  



PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 1 November 4, 1941 

FILE:STATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL? 526,666 PAGE 1} 
EE EE Ed 

JEFFERSON PARISH CONTINUED=- 

PRECINCT 10C ecessescscscssccencns 

PRECINCT 10D FETE EEE IN AI A 

PRECINCT 10E EEE EE RERENE EEE] se eee 

PRECINCT 10F cesesscssvescsesscnse 

PRECINCT 10G EE EE EEN EEE EN CECI BIE I J 

PRECINCT 10H es evepsesessssss ence 

PRECINCT 10K EEE RE EERE EIN CIC BC BBE BE I A J 

PRECINCT i1 FEE ECR BA CECE BIE BB BA 

PRECINCT 11A EYEE EEE I BA 

PRECINCT 11K EEE EE ERE EEE EN CRC I 

PRECINCT 12 EEE EEE EE ENE] CECE NCB BL 

PRECINCT 12A CCRC NE I BA J eee votes 

PRECINCT 12K PRrSPSPS CEE CR IRC IIE EI A 

PRECINCT 13 cescescssscsssscseces 

PKECINCT 13A EE EE EEE NE EEN ses eoae es 

PRECIT NCT 13K FER EEE IN CECI BEBE BB J 

PRECINCT 14K "EEE REE ERNE EN NEN CIC BBL J 

PRECINCT 15K FEE EEE EE NE CECI BC BL J 

PRECINCT 16K EERE EE ERNE EEE 

PRECINCT 24K es evsssss sass 

10 
PRECINCT 13 EEE EE EERE EEE A 

PRECINCT 14 EEE EE EEN EEE EN ee ose 

PRECINCT 15 FET EERE EEE ERE BI Ad 

PRECINCT 16 PEE EEE EE II RIA Bd 

PRECINCT 31 FREE EE EIEN EE I CC NB 

PRECINCT 
MEE EEE EE EER IEE EEE 

PRECINCT . "EERE RE EEE EE EE NJ CC BJ 

PRECINCT EEE EEE EE RE I 

PRECINCY 
"EEE EE EEN EE EEE CIC BL 

PRECINCT 
PETE EEE EEE ENR Ed 

PRECINCT 
"EEE EEE EE EE Seo eee 

PRECINCT 
FEC RE CRC I BE I CECE NE IB 

PRECINCT 
MEE EEE EE EE CEC IE BE BI J 

PRECINCT 
ME EERE EEE IIE AI BE 

PRECINCT 
YE EEERE EEE REE NAN NE ENS 

PRECINCT 
PEC J LIC BBE BEB BL A J 

PRECINCT csessssvessssscsesee 

PRECINCT esescesssssnssescons 

PRECINCT 
FEE EE NI IE eve ene 

PRECINCT cesessccsscssssccccee 

WARD 11 MEER EEE EE I IN Id 1,993 

JEFFERSON PARISH TOTAL IS 377,400  



PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT : 1} Movember 4, 1981 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 526,666 PAGE 4 

BT 
vttuvnsummensri

mwnnsspiuguanin
ungensaessunnnn

nsegmmengns an
 

ORLEANS PARISH 

WARD 15 esses eecscscsoecssnoss
se 59,120 

ORLEANS PARISH TOTAL IS 

PLAQUEMINES 
PARISH 

SOB III UIE 988500098 26,049 

ST BERNARD PARISH secs env asisssanesvee 64,097 

 



PLAN :PROPOSAL RB UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT 2 November 4, 1981 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 525,138 PAGE 1 

ne ES GS We ES A OB Ye Su Ee BG SD SP EN G0 GS Ge RS G6 We GR GN G0 U8 5 SO G4 ER Gp WBS GE Cn CU 00 EP ED ED ER 0S = 

JEFFERSUN PARISH 

WARD 7; 
PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

WARD 8 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

WARD 10 
PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCY 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT 

PRECINCT See Bosses ses ans 1,211 

PRECINCT 10 EERE EEE RIC I I I 1,252 

PRECINCT 11 ee ec saccs sesso se 1+,293 

PRECINCT 12 eesesecsccsssecssnes 168 

JEFFERSON PARISH TOTAL TIS 

PR EE RC I BBE BE BE BEBE IE BL J 592 

Pe eOvO9BOGOORPEOERNOIOEL SDL 134 

EEE EEE EIA EEN BN I a5) 

S
W
 

N 
- 

EEE EEE IE I ECE EA 394 

es oeecsvsscscessecese 1,003 

ees ess eenesseetense 513 

MEER EEE RE IRR NC 881 

EEE EEE IE NE REI I 1,074 

EEE EE EEE EI IRIAN I 1,505 

EERE II BRAN 847 

EEE EREREEEI IEE I ICE EN 944 

TEE EE EEE IE II II EE I 770 

N
S
N
 

D
W
N
 

LS
) 

TEE EEE ERIE BN NE NEN 442 

MEER EEE CR AR AE A 4 1,830 

"EEE E EEE EINE EIN NN 1,887 

se evoessccsvssssbessce 1,713 

EERE EE EEE EI IR AINA 1,352 

MEER EE EE II NRA I 1,704 

eees veces esesneccn 1,500 

MEER EEE IN IER A 1,289 

FERRE EEE RRR RCA AA RA 859 

V
O
L
U
N
 

d
w
n
 

ORLEANS PARISH 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 
WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

wssenssessesscvssenss 6,852 

es ecsenssessssssoseo 11,961 

et ecsevscesscesssens 18,564 

ev ees vs eee OBOsOOE 25,553 

PCIE I ICICI SCE BEA BE BE I 18,149 

eevee ssseseevsevnsoy 9,926 

eee eevs sos esnnessees 63,971 

ee ees css eset eeLvLLe 33,070 

sve alsin assem us vias 194,998] 

C
V
O
 

N
D
 
W
N
 

—
 

FEE RI I BRR IE BE BEE EAE 18,014  



  

  

PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 8 November 4, 1981 

FILEISTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL? 524,943 PAGE 2 

IBERVILLE PARISH 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 
WARD es 00 es geet aceEs Os 

IBERVILLE PARISH TOTAL IS 

Pees eOP POO SPIOEOSIBNOOSOSTOOS 

PCC CIC ICE ERE IE BE A I 

eevee sOePRONGOGICEOISIOOITLDS 

POI I BCR ICS BBR RRB A 

ev eec seco NOseONLONS 

PCE RCC NR NE BA I 

O
V
O
 
L
O
N
D
 

W
N
 

—-
 

POINTE COUPEE PARISH EEEEEE EE REN ENN NE EN NEN] 24,045 

RAPIDES PARISH 
WARD eseceseceseRReRsOL OS 54,972 

WARD PCR CR IC ICI RRR AAA I CI 3,970 

WARD PEE ER IIE BC BB A 4,046 

WARD ee ec ePeseeOsIOEBOIOTCRETS 5,287 

WARD EEE EEE RE RNR I NE 3,463 

WARD ee eececsecsesscevssoe 1,434 

WARD PEC BC CRE BEI BEBE BE BE I A 5,000 

WARD @e® 90 COP OOOSSOEOLOISSe TS 13,154 

WARD e980 essences eP LOO RNPOTS 16,114 

RAPIDES PARISH TOTAL IS 107,440 

ST LANDRY PARISH cevesiesisenrassecsses 98,128 

WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH cseccccevcvccccscccsnes 19,086 

W FELICIANA PARISH EEEEEE RENEE NE NEE EEE NR] 12,186



  

PLANIPROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 8 November 4, 1981 
FILEISTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL: 524,943 PAGE 1 

ALLEN PARISH 

WARD 1 Se s00secserssssrore 2,914 

WARD 5 Cv P sess srsecessvene 10,367 

ALLEN PARISH TOTAL IS 

AVOYELLES PARISH 2 Sev eves rsssELES 41,393 

EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH 

WARD 1 

PRECINCT 20 Gseseseveccsecvvvvon 

PRECINCT 21 Sev vsevssnvsnsrennere 

PRECINCT 22 oes vsecsccsvvesnuny 

PRECINCT 23 ® 9 SPs see OOO RNIL SNS 

PRECINCT 24 ® 9 000 POOP ORPOEEES Se 

PRECINCT 25 ® 6 O00 OO OLB SENPIPOIELETS 

PRECINCT 26 ceescscscscecsccnony 
PRECINCT 28 ® 9800 OPO PESO ROPOIOTTNTDS 

PRECINCT 31 Peso vevsesencevencsee 

PRECINCT 50 @P ess ecerovsrescsvancae 

PRECINCT 58 etevevececsescccsccnce 
PRECINCT 62 SSP OGIO POEIONBLIIPSIINTTPOETDY 

PRECINCT 23 ® 8 SP 09 OO 9s as eran 

PRECINCT 84 Ps ees e0tenssenveeee 

PRECINCT 8s eves eves sessseesreense 

PRECINCT 86 Sess eevee ssecssnssss 

PRECINCT 91 LAL BL BL BL BE BE BE BE BL BE BE BN BE BBE BE BBY AE) 

PRECINCT 92 Ses veecevsescsansrsense 

PRECINCT 93 ® 9 OOP SOB Os PONT OEBNPTOETIPDSN 

WARD 2 ® OOS S00 GIOGsOLs ENOL 72,099 

WARD 3 
PRECINCT 1 LL BL BB BI BE BEB BE BY BRE BB RY 

PRECINCT fA Sveecsecsssrscsescnne 

PRECINCT 9 SS sO P00 v ss eve TOIRREILDS 

PRECINCT 14 ® ® 99S see SELL Les 

EAST BATON ROUGF PARISH TOTAL IS 138,867 

E FELICIANA PARISH ¢esevsecvecccscscsces 19,015 

EVANGELINE PARISH eeescsrcccsvcscvcsces 33,343  



  
  

PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TU DISTRICT 7 November 4, 1961 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 523,847 PAGE. 2 

we SS eG NP We SW GP G0 US GE GS TS SEU EL PE GP ES URW SE SY UD Ee Ns me ee 

VERMILION PARISH e008 ces ecsose RRL eS 48,458 

 



  

  

PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 17 Hovember 4, 1981 
FILEISTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL: 523,847 PAGE | 

ACADIANA PARISH S00 s essere acs 56,427 

ALLEN PARISH 

WARD 2 $0 000s 0essevOePRILL 5,242 

WARD 3 ® 0 00st PORNOLIOIERNOOIOPONTPOTS 1,292 

WARD 4 CIC BBE BBN NCO SE NN NN I) 1,515 

ALLEN PARISH TOTAL IS 

BEAUREGARD PARISH 

WARD B® 00000000 coenreenree 

WARD @® S000 0000000Ps0s0e 

WARD 0 0eecv00evnsvronvse 

WARD 5 Pv sec avse0voeveene 

WARD CCEA BEC IE IE IY BREEN BB 

WARD 00000000 renvrssre 

WARD 9000s ecnvvreccssecre 

BEAUREGARD PARISH TOTAL IS 

CALCASIEU PARISH cescscrcrcrcracneeesl167,048 

CAMERON PARISH ecsccssecsscensssssece 9,336 

JEFFERSON DAVIS PARISH (veseecesssssssesincese 32,168 

LAFAYETTE PARISH sesececcccsevesssscesel50,017 

ST MARTIN PARISH 

WARD 1 

PRECINCT Se eos vecsvcssnvsnree 

PRECINCT eos esscnecsecsvecses 

PRECINCT Cees cwveevescosvgerve 

PRECINCT . eee evsevssrsrevncssace 

PRECINCT cecosesrcvescrscnnes 
WARD 2 e®P PPO N NGOS OOSIOeeravRe 4,561 

WARD 3 CIEE BE BE BE BE BE BENE BEI I NN 5,030 

WARD 4 CECE BE BE BE BIE I BE BEE NEE ENE CR 13,414 

WARD 5 CELE A BL BE BL BK BE BEE BUNCE IE BENE YA) 8,995 

ST MARTIN PARISH TOTAL IS  



PLANSPROPUSAL B UNITS ASSIGUED TO DISTRICT 6 

FILE:STATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 525,074 

LIVINGSTON PARISH CONTINUED= 

WARD 2 Lecceccesscccvcccene
 24,488 

WARD 3 

PRECINCT 
YY ETTII EN NEE RE RE RAR 

PRECINCT eeessecss secs vssose 

PRECINCT es esses sesecsenssevl 

WARD 4 

PRECINCT 4=- eeesesscecscesspevc
s 

PRECINCT 4- evseesesvesevesP esc 

PKECINCT A= eeesepsecssecescsevc
s 

PRECINCT 6~= 

PRECINCT 6= esses ssesesssesepeose
 

LIVINGSTON PARISH TOTAL 1S 

ST HELENA PARISH 
eescsssnsqcses

csncons 9,827 

ST TAMMANY PARISH Ye demas a ves enins suns sd 10,554 

TANGIPAHOA PARISH ci sam bess sone vibes WES 80,698 

WASHINGTON PARISH cesses sssssscvececes 44,207 

 



PLAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 6 November 4, 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL? 525,074 PAGE 2 

a 
haf di oaths sar de shot eect Snail og 

EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH CONTINUED= 

PRECINCT 57 EEE EE EE IRR II A 

PRECINCT 59 eee sens Oetessese OL 

PRECINCT 60 MEE EERE EEE EI EE 

PRECINCT 61 PEE EEE EE I RI 

PRECINCT 63 ME EEEE EEE EE I AE NEE 

PRECINCT 64 MEE EERE EERIE NE NA 

PRECINCT 65 PETE EE EEE RCI I A 

PRECINCT 66 es esse ves tenses 

PRECINCT EE EEE EERE RIN BE A 

PRECINCT 
"EE EEEEE EE RENE REN EEE 

PRECINCT 
MEE EERE EE RR NE EE 

PRECINCT es evesesssosensenv eee 

PRECINCT PEE EEE RR RR BI BE 

PRECINCT es e0eBROIIOROIRCRESIOOSDS 

PRECINCT 
MEE EEE EEC RI IE BI A 

PRECINCT 
PEE EERE EEE RII 

PRECINCT 
ME EEE EE EEN ENE NE AE 

PRECINCT 
EEE EEE EERE IE 

PRECINCT esse cessevrsepssenPee 

PRECINCT TEE EE EER IRC BIE 

PRECINCT 
"EEE EEE ENN IEE NE 

PRECINCT sess ececssssssesessD 

PRECINCT 
"EEE EEERENRE RENEE EEE 

PRECINCT PETE ERE EE RC II BL 

PRECINCT 
MET EEE EEE IR CA 

PRECINCT 
MEE EE EEE RII I A EAL 

PRECINCT 
PETE EEE ECE CR Rd 

PRECINCT 
EEE EEE IE EI 

WARD 3 

PRECINCT 
EEE ERE EEE EE II EE EE 

PRECINCT cesses esses esvscscccee 

PRECINCT 
PEPE II IE SCN RC REC RIE BL BL J 

PRECINCT 
MEE EEE EE IE I A 

PRECINCT 
PETE EE EEE RCA BL 

PRECINCT esescsecsssssesssceven 

PRECINCT 
PE EERE EEE RCE IE I 

PRECINCT esse esevs sevens 

PRECINCT 
MEER EEE RN RA 

FAST BATON ROUGE PARISH TUTAL IS 227,297 

LIVINGSTON PARISH 

WARD 1 EEE EEEE ERE EEE II 14,693  



PLAN:PROPOSAL R UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 6 November 4, 1981 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALZ 525,074 PAGE. 1 

Nw a a ves res os wt ite pe 0 0 1 + 5 50 9 0 46 A 48 AUR 5 tat 0 M8 20 St 0 SS 1 A 0 

EAST RATON ROUGE PARISH 

WARD, 1 

PRECINCT esses vecscsscsessans ence 

PRECINCT eeeevssccscsvscsccvesse 

PRECINCT eesecssesssesseeeRee 

PRECINCT ess sess escnsesssesss 

PRECINCT esses sasvcscsecvensers 

PRECINCT ees csssnscsesccvevrep 

PRECINCT evs ses ecssvesoesvese 

PRECINCT sss evsenvecssscsvevone 

PRECINCT ee esses esvecesveeee 

PRECINCT es essscsevessssreene 

PRECINCT cesses eeessessesens ee 

PRECINCT eececsseseseseeesaenee 

PRECINCT EEE EE LEE RII RR 

PRECINCT sees vecceseccoscersee 

PRECINCT eves sess sressesevee 

PRECINCT sevecsecssccsesePeesvee 

PRECINC'L 7? sees ceenesssvsecsense 

PRECINCT es ess acscssesseenens 

PRECINCT esesscecsssssssesssces 

PRECINCT sescecceessseesessc on 

PRECINCT eevee ssscscscsensesses 

PRECINCT es ecesssesecsssavsecse 

PKECINCYT cee s ose ss severe 

PRECINCT PTE EEE EEE RE II NN 

PRECINCT cesecscssssssssensoe 

PRECINCT % FETE EERE EE ER Bd 

PRECINCT ee sees eve estes EOS 

PRECINCT evevsesssecsssensecaes 

PRECINCT cesses scsecssssensves 

PRECINCT eee Pv ecssscsecsseves 

PRECINCT eee veessecsssacnonne 

PRECINCT esesccsssscsecscncsee 

PRECINCT es eecsssesvss ssn 

PRECINCT esos esses essere ss en 

PRECINCT ET EEE RN RN I) 

PRECINCT esses ccscesensevssssnes 

PRECINCT esses sessssesvencven 

PRECINCT > ececsssccsesccssnacs ss 

PRECINCT esses sssssasssssves 

PRECINCT ) Gecessscsssssscusses 

PRECINCT se evscssscsscssvsecave 

PRECINCT ) es esses sssenenssee 

PRECINCT ) ess sees vs esses evsee  



UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT 5 

PLAN: PROPOSAL R 
DISTRICT TOTALS 527,656 

FILE:STATE SENATE 

 



PLANSPROPOSAL B 

FILESSTATE SENATE 

UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT 

DISTRICT TOTALS 527, 

ordi 
IER Tat REL ME CL dot gi 

RIENVILLE PARISH 

CALDWELL PARISH 

CATAHOULA PARISH 

COMCORDIA PARISH 

E CARROLL PARISH 

FRANKLIN PARISH 

GRANT PARISH 

JACKSON PARISH 

LA SALLE PARISH 

LINCOLN PARISH 

MADISON PARISH 

MOREHOUSE PARISH 

NATCHITOCHES PARISH 

QUACHITA PARISH 

RAPIDES PARISH 

WARD 10 

WARD 11 

RAPIDES PARI 

RICHLAND PARISH 

TENSRS PARISH 

UNION PARISH 

W CARROLL PARISH 

WINN PARISH 

APPIN TW LY EE 0 Bc do 

SH TOTAL IS 

sev VaR ees U YEN ek e's 

EI EI ts dh di egg 

esos sees evs bs seein 

Sessa aseneisese
nsnys 

cevv stds reteenens 
en 

sess soso assesses 
sy 

PPT TA do ddd dle Ng 

Dsbsesies ian assess sn 

Tes sssssse
sviesenesie

s 

se vesp ees esessca
ns ee 

Gssssesss
essiessse

y 

sess tov ess secess ness 

39,863 
AP LT A Sh ie Cac hg 

eye
 ne saan e1 39024] 

20,117 
1.728 

es esses soso 

22,187 
ho 

tii 2h 

6,525 

21,167 

12,922 
ERT TUTE RE RS Ret dd 

17,253 
ERNE BL RE Dal Adal 

tHovember 4, 

1 

1981 

- ee WY. Oe = 

 



PLAN: PROPOSAL A UNITS ASSIGHED To DISTRICT 

FILE:STATE 
SENATE 

DISTRICT TOTALS 

EH 
wane 

suspsrm
ensumps

cungRER
ny 

BEAUREGARD 
PARTSH 

WARD 
3 Potre

 P ERR LO Baki
 

AEAUREGARD PARISH TOTAL IS 

pOSSIER PARISH 
casmsinnse 

CADDO PARISH 

CLAIBORNE PARISH 

DE SOTO PARISH 

RED RIVER PARISH 

SABINE PARISH 
2 sweat as eseens 

VERNON PARISH 

WEBSTER PARISH 

November 

PAGE 

 



PLAN:PKUPUSAL R UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 3 November 4, 1981 

FILESSTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 525,581 PAGE. 2 

papspspepee PY LE Ll Lod ode dehahas En oe ia awn wo ve lm or A A 0 45 1 A 

LIVINGSTON PARISH CONTINUED= 

PRECINCT 5«2 Csssssenessssas
ssney 4317 

PRECINCT 10-1 sees esssesssssessne
y 974 

LIVINGSTON PARISH TOTAL IS 
6,164 

ST CHARLES PARISH ccescevsscsssssesssse
 317,259 

ST JAMES PARISH cess nes ssVEEIRSTRSSS 21,495 

ST JOHN THE BRPT PARISH ccccccscccsccnccnccs
 31,924 

ST MARTIN PARISH 

WARD 1 
PRECINCT 

5 FET PENT of Rg nd hhh od 1,148 

ST MARTIN PARISH TOTAL IS 
1,148 

ST MARY PARISH 
PIER 

2 ei hg dbo d 64,395 

TERREBONNE 
PARISH 

PETE EET GC ES Sedbind 94,393 

 



PLAN:PROPUSAL B UNITS ASSIGHED TO DISTRICT November 

FILEISTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTAL: 
PAGE 

RE trier dnmnen
nvaerhanmun

guinvssnans
nnneny 

ASCENSION PARISH 

ASSUMPTIO
N PARISH 

cess vt ossssne
sesses Ee 

IBERIA 
PARISH 

PEPE 
RR Es ed 

JEFFERSON PARISH 

WARD 9 
PRECINCT 

WTI HER fe eds 4,146 

PRECINCT 
PER TERRE RET Sb dd th 1,785 

PRECINCT 
906008 098484806939

 2,753 

PRECINCT 
ses ss ses viene dines sey 4,453 

PRECINCT 
Css neress ase seeennsy 4,296 

PRECINCT 
OT RI BD bh dh hdl dg 1,593 

PRECINCT 
MRR TE LE LE Te Adie 2,921 

PRECINCT 
Neasesuse

sesssvsen
ey 223A 

PRECINCT 
9 eave NIIES SESS INS INN 2.994 

PRECINCT 
dev eines sens 

Yess 2,554 

PRECINCT 
csv ese ssessesn

vesves 2,910 

WARD 10 

PRECINCT 
cesses iossass

evasseesys 
2,611 

PRECINCT 
. sess ae ess ses sess ey 2,670 

PRECINCT cis emus vies veicesiees 1,388 

PRECINCT 
Ere EY TA Aa hud Ti 1,230 

PRECINCT 
seers s ess dees sss Easel 812 

PRECINCT 
Tssssesss

ssvavses sed 1,552 

PRECINCT 
eee eine eS BSNS Y ND ES 1,359 

PRECINCT 
RN Tae Eno BS he By 1,149 

PRECINCT 
Cisse svasesses

nysuel 1,860 

PRECINCT 
cs ss saves ssessnenes 

1,604 

PRECINCT 
ce esas uve 

essastes 
1,037 

JEFFERSON PARISH TOTAL IS 

LAFOURCHE PARISH reas 6 0in ViNE S888 000.08 82,483 

LIVINGSTON PARISH 

WARD 3 

PRECINCT 
cas uss ese sss sdessnny 2,139 

PRECIN
CT 

cist es sessis s
ven 

700 

WARD 4 

PRECINCT - Coss uses ase eens NSNSe 1,664 

PRECINCT 5 iss sade eseeite asse
s 250  



PILAN:PROPOSAL B UNITS ASSIGNED TO DISTRICT 2 : Movember 4, 

FILEISTATE SENATE DISTRICT TOTALS 525,138 PAGE 2 

- nw on we = 

ORLEANS 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 

WARD 
WARD 

ORLEANS PARISH TOTAL IS 

  

- on "WE ee Sw G8 ES Ee wn 0S 08 os ein we es a He SU 3 Jp Vt 6 8 em 29,57 2 

PARISH CONTINUED= 

essa sess sGCRSNSSSIVS 

cesses sesesssse
sss Rey 

esssssssccvess
cssnne 

es0s0eecsesssss
es Oe 

cscs ecscescsss
scece 

17 esssseasesasssssss
ss 498,362

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.


Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.