Response of Appellants in Support of Motion to Intervene as Appellants

Public Court Documents
October 7, 1998

Cite this item

Response of Appellants in Support of Motion to Intervene as Appellants preview

3 pages

Document text

The following text has been generated automatically during the document scanning process. It may contain errors, omissions, or incorrect formatting. Please refer to the PDF document if this text is not usable.

Download

By downloading, publishing, or reusing the Materials outside of the Website, you hereby confirm and attest that you have read and agree to the LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use linked below. We draw your attention to the following:

For those Materials owned by LDF, your use of the Material outside the Site is solely for one or more of the following (the “Permitted Purposes”):

Non-commercial research and private study;
Teaching, scholarship and instruction (including distance learning);
Non-commercial print and non-commercial online use;
Criticism, comment or news reporting; or
For people with visual disabilities (See Section 121 of the Copyright Act).
For those Materials not owned by LDF you understand that:
- It is your responsibility to determine whether the way you plan to use the materials falls within the copyright exception of Fair Use.
- For any use outside of Fair Use, it is your responsibility to seek and obtain all required permissions from any existing rights holders.

LDF hereby grants you the right to use LDF owned Materials for the Permitted Purposes without seeking further permission from LDF.

If you publish or redistribute any Materials (including excerpts and quotes), you must include a credit line and/or proper citation to the source of the Material. However, you may not use the name of LDF in any manner which creates any false association between you and LDF or that incorrectly implies any sponsorship or endorsement of you by LDF.

NOTICE: Uses that do not comply with these Terms or that do not fall under Fair Use (or another exception) may make you liable for copyright infringement.

Read the full LDF Archival Collection Terms of Use Here.

I agree to the terms and conditions for use of this content.

If you would like to use this content in other ways, contact us at

Impact area
- Political Participation
Topic
- Redistricting
LDF Attorneys
Cooperating Attorneys
Organizations
Matter
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
Case
- Cromartie v. Hunt (Daly v. Hunt)
U.S. state
- North Carolina
Collection
- Case Files
Taxonomy
Identifier
- b17fc00e-e40e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6

Cite this item

Case Files, Cromartie Hardbacks. Response of Appellants in Support of Motion to Intervene as Appellants, 1998. b17fc00e-e40e-f011-9989-7c1e5267c7b6. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/40f3187d-e9b6-4d51-a74d-90c6704688ad/response-of-appellants-in-support-of-motion-to-intervene-as-appellants. Accessed May 14, 2025.

Copied!

No. 98-85

In the

Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1998

JAMES B. HUNT, JRr., in his official capacity as

Governor of the State of North Carolina, ef al.,

Appellants, yo

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al.,

Appellees.

RESPONSE OF APPELLANTS IN SUPPORT

OF MOTION BY SMALLWOOD, ET AL., TO

INTERVENE AS APPELLANTS

Appellants, James B. Hunt, Jr., ef al., by their undersigned counsel, respond to the motion

to intervene as appellants in this action by Alfred Smallwood, et al., by supporting such intervention.

The Smallwood appellants are currently defendant-intervenors in the court below and have

important interests which the disposition of this appeal will affect. Intervention will not delay the

appeal of this matter and, for the reasons stated in their motion, the Smallwood parties should be

allowed to intervene as appellants in this appeal.

Respectfully submitted, this 7th day of October, 1998.

MICHAEL F. EASLEY

North Carolina Attorney General

Lr
Edwin M. Speas, Jr.

Chief Deputy Attorney General

Tiare B. Smiley

Special Deputy Attorney General

Melissa Saunders

Special Counsel to the Attorney General

North Carolina Department of Justice f

Post Office Box 629

Raleigh, NC 27609-0629

(919) 716-6900

COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTS

No. 98-85

In the

Supreme Court of the United States
October Term, 1998

JAMES B. HUNT, JR., in his official capacity as

Governor of the State of North Carolina, et al.,

Appellants,

MARTIN CROMARTIE, et al.,
Annelloos PE oF AA

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Edwin M. Speas, Jr., Chief Deputy Attorney General, a member of the bar of this Court

and counsel of record for State appellants in this case, hereby certify that all parties required to be

served a copy of the Response of Appellantsin Support of Motion By Smallwood, ef al., to Intervene

as Appellants have been served, and more particularly, that I have on this 7th day of October, 1998,

deposited a copy of this Response in the United States mail, first-class postage prepaid, addressed

as follows:

Robinson O. Everett Todd A. Cox

Everett & Everett NAACP Legal Defense &

Post Office Box 586 Educational Fund

Durham, NC 27702 1444 1 Street, N.W., 10th Floor

Telephone: (919) 682-5691 Washington, DC 20005

Telephone: (202) 682-1300

This the 7th day of October, 1998.

Edwin M. Speas, Jr.

Chief Deputy Attorney General

Copyright notice

This collection and the tools to navigate it (the “Collection”) are available to the public for general educational and research purposes, as well as to preserve and contextualize the history of the content and materials it contains (the “Materials”). Like other archival collections, such as those found in libraries, LDF owns the physical source Materials that have been digitized for the Collection; however, LDF does not own the underlying copyright or other rights in all items and there are limits on how you can use the Materials. By accessing and using the Material, you acknowledge your agreement to the Terms. If you do not agree, please do not use the Materials.

Additional info

To the extent that LDF includes information about the Materials’ origins or ownership or provides summaries or transcripts of original source Materials, LDF does not warrant or guarantee the accuracy of such information, transcripts or summaries, and shall not be responsible for any inaccuracies.

Response of Appellants in Support of Motion to Intervene as Appellants

Impact area

Topic

LDF Attorneys

Cooperating Attorneys

Organizations

Matter

Case

U.S. state

Collection

Taxonomy

Identifier

Cite this item

Copyright notice

Additional info

You may also be interested in