Julius LeVonne Chambers Elected President of LDF
Press Release
January 21, 1975

Cite this item
-
Press Releases, Loose Pages. The U.S. Supreme Court this week agreed to review the case of a Birmingham, Ala. Negro arrested and sentenced to death…, 1961. 7af915e2-bc92-ee11-be37-00224827e97b. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/b3942c8f-7792-4c5b-bee9-002ccbcb6969/the-us-supreme-court-this-week-agreed-to-review-the-case-of-a-birmingham-ala-negro-arrested-and-sentenced-to-death. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
~from: Celie Ives New England Committee naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc, Box 154 Lincoln, Massachusetts 01773 (617) 259-8667 Contact: Barbara Shapiro (617) 723-4688 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE BOSTON, MASS., April 22--Inmates and members of the Advisory Board at the Massachusetts Correctional Institution at Concord are chall- enging the overcrowded conditions at that State penal institution in a Federal law suit. The suit is scheduled for trial in Federal Dis- trict Court before Judge Andrew A, Caffrey by the naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund the week of April 255 1977 ~ The suit, by the naacp Legal Defense and Educational Fund, was filed in 1975 against the Departments of Corrections, Human Resources and Public Health. In June of 1976 a decree was entered by the Court to the Department of Public Health ordering the Department to adopt regulations to develop sanitary conditions in all State prisons. The law suit is now going against the remaining defendants, including the Department of Corrections. The plaintiffs claim that overcrowding at Concord has become increasingly severe over the past four years. Men sleep two to a 60 sq. ft, cell or in one of ten triple bunk beds in a hospital designed for 18 men, They are kept in their cells (or in the hospital) nearly 20 hours a day, for a two to three month classification period. In addition to these intolerable living conditions, the suit alleges that the overcrowding at M,C,I. Concord has resulted in the virtual collapse of all rehabilitation and medical treatment. This has occurred in an institution for our youngest adult offenders, the flajority of whom are between the ages of 17 and 25. The Advisory Board, which is composed of both inmates and members of the local community, has frequently brought these conditions to the attention of the defendants but, the Board alleges, no relief is forthcoming. Therefore, the local residents on the Board have taken the unusual step of joining with the inmates to bring this lawsuit. The original complaint charged that between January 1973 and March 1975 the population at M.C.I. Concord has consisted of approxi- mately 410 men, despite the fact that the maximum housing capacity of the institution has not exceeded 365 during that period. In 1977 the average population at Concord was 500. Since men have been assigned to sleep in the hospital, there has been no adequate medical care at Concord for over three years. M.C.I. Concord is the only State prison facility with such over- crowded conditions. The plaintiffs claim that the overcrowding in the classification area is unnecessary. The plaintiffs claim that the conditions deny the men protection of the law as compared to men at other State institutions. They also claim that forcing them to live under these conditions impedes re- habilitation and is consideréd cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the U. S. Constitution. NOTE TO REPORTERS AND EDITORS PLEASE DO NOT CONFUSE the Legal Defense Fund (LDF) with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. They are entirely separate organizations. The NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., (to use its full title) was originally established by the NAACP in 1939, but the two groups have long since separated. The LDF continues to use the initials NAACP in its title to show its origin. NAACP or the NAACP's Legal Defense Fund," because that is wrong. The LDF has a national staff and headquarters in New York City and it works on over 1,000 cases with 400 cooperating attorneys throughout the country. In the past 35 years, the LDF has led the battle for equal justice under the law in this country, winning hundreds of legal victories over discrimination in employment, public accommodation and education. The LDF has argued more cases before the U. S. Supreme Court than any other law office other than the U. S. Solicitor General's office.