Reply of LDF to Resolution of NAACP Convention Re: Use of "NAACP" by LDF in Name
Press Release
June 25, 1979
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Alexander v. Holmes Hardbacks. Response to Motion for Summary Reversal and Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Population Response Thereto, 1969. 60304a67-cf67-f011-bec2-6045bdffa665. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/ae42dff7-25ee-4b17-a6fb-1a5496c55783/response-to-motion-for-summary-reversal-and-brief-in-support-of-motion-to-dismiss-and-population-response-thereto. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS /
N
A
~
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
NO, 1209 (W)
(DISTRICT COURT NUMBER)
ROY LEE HARRIS, ET ALS,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
VS,
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
W. C. MARTIN, Superintendent, E, E,
MARTIN, Successor to E, H, SELBY,
A, S., NICHOLS, Successor to H, Y, SWAYZE,
R., D. HINES, HUGH W, ADAMS and JOE S, STONER,
Successor to R, J, HATCHETT, Members of the
Yazoo County Board of Education; THE HOLLY
BLUFF LINE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
J. P, HILL, Superintendent, BURDETTE BOYD,
Ww. T. HEGMAN, JR,, Successor to F, W,
SHARBROUGH, C, E, SAVERY, CHARLES H, HUFF,
and M, A, HATCHETIT, JR,, Members of the
Board of Trustees,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
* % * *
MOTION TO DISMISS
% x * %
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL
AND
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS
AND RESPONSE THERETO
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
NO, 1209 (W)
ROY LEE HARRIS, ET ALS,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
VS,
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
W. C. MARTIN, Superintendent, E, E,
MARTIN, Successor to E, H, SELBY,
A, S, NICHOLS, Successor to H, Y, SWAYZE,
R. D, HINES, HUGH W, ADAMS and JOE S, STONER,
Successor to R, J, HATCHETT, Members of the
Yazoo County Board of Education; THE HOLLY
BLUFF LINE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
J. P. HILL, Superintendent, BURDETTE BOYD,
Ww. T, HEGMAN, JR,, Successor to F, W,
SHARBROUGH, C, E, SAVERY, CHARLES H, HUFF,
and M, A, HATCHETT, JR,, Members of the
Board of Trustees,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
MOTION TO DISMISS
Now come the above named appellees, for the reasons
hereinafter stated, and respectfully move the Court to dismiss
the Motion for Summary Reversal in the above said action:
: 1°
This Court will not act upon a Motion for Summary Reversal
which motion would rule upon the rights of litigants not now
before the Court but who have filed notice of appeals and will
be brought later before the Court in these consolidated cases
through the orderly process of appeal,
11,
The exhibits "A' through '"L'" to Motion for Summary Reversal
were not provided to counsel for appellees as a part of the
said Motion served on counsel, in violation of Rule 25 of the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,
I1L.
This Court will not act upon an appeal and Motion for Sum-
mary Reversal of the decision of the District Court without
having before it the record as designated by the parties to
the suit, No such record is before the Court on this Motion,
Vv.
There has been filed in the suit of United States of
America v. Hinds County School Board, et als, Civil Action No,
4075 Jackson Division, an appeal by the plaintiffs, Notice of
appeal was duly served upon the attorneys of record in said pro-
ceeding on Friday, June 13, By stipulation the evidence in said
proceeding was made a part of the record in the above styled
cause, The Court will not act upon a Motion for Summary Re-
versal of the above styled cause without having before it the
record in said Cause No, 4075, United States District Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson Division, which,
by stipulation, was made a part of the record herein,
Vv.
Those grounds for dismissal set out in Paragraph III,C.
of Response to Motion for Summary Reversal attached hereto and
made a part hereof,
Respectfully submitted,
|
Walter R, Bridgfo¥th
Bridgforth & Love
108 East Jefferson Street
Yazoo City, Mississippi
Yd
, Williams & Buford
Post Office Box 466
Yazoo City, Mississippi
ohn C, Satterfie
Satterfield, Shel
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
NO, 1209 (W)
ROY LEE HARRIS, ET ALS,
PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS
VS.
THE YAZOO COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION,
W. C. MARTIN, Superintendent, E, E,
MARTIN, Successor to E, H, SELBY,
A, S, NICHOLS, Successor to H, Y, SWAYZE,
R, D, HINES, HUGH W, ADAMS, and JOE S, STONER,
Successor to R, J, HATCHETT, Members of the
Yazoo County Board of Education; THE HOLLY
BLUFF LINE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT,
J. P, HILL, Superintendent, BURDETTE BOYD,
Ww. T, HEGMAN, JR,, Successor to F, W,
SHARBROUGH, C, E, SAVERY, CHARLES H, HUFF,
and M, A, HATCHETT, JR,, Members of the
Board of Trustees,
DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL
BRIEF IN SUPPORT SD AoTion TO DISMISS
AND RESPONSE THERETO
1.
STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES ON THIS APPEAL
A, Where the opinion appealed from includes and rules
the case of eighteen defendant school districts, in addition
to the seven school districts brought before the court by
Motion for Summary Reversal, will the Court hear such Motion
where such eighteen additional defendants are not before the
court but will be later brought before the court in the orderly
course of appeals, notices of appeal in such cases having been
filed?
B, On Motion for Summary Reversal, will the court proceed
where no copies of Exhibits '"A'" through "L'' have been furnished
counsel for appellees as required by Rule 25 of the Rules
of Appellate Procedure?
C., Where three District Judges sat en banc and heard
twenty-five school cases, involving thirty-three school systems,
in hearings extending over several weeks, including testimony
of numerous expert witnesses, will the court entertain a Motion
for Summary Reversal where the following questions, not hereto-
fore appearing in Adams, Greenwood, Clarksdale, Marshall County,
Indianola or Hall, are raised on appeal from the District Court's
opinion and cannot be fairly weighed without careful consideration
of the record? Said questions being:
1. Where Freedom of Choice, as prescribed by Jefferson,
is working save for failure to infuse white students
into formerly Negro schools or Negroes into white
schools in desired numbers, will a modification of
the freedom of choice plan be given a further chance
(where school officials have been prevented by the
terms of the plan itself from encouraging students
to enroll in any particular school) and the plan be
modified, through ex mero motu action of this court,
to allow school officials to encourage white students
to attend formerly Negro schools and Negroes to attend
formerly white schools if needful to the success of
the plan?
2. When a school district is, in good faith, applying a
freedom of choice plan which is making progress toward
affectuating a transition to a unitary system, to
what extent may the district court consider the
testimony of qualified disinterested experts who
found that: (a) greater desegregation will be achieved
and (b) much better public education secured through
freedom of choice as compared to some plan of
forced desegregation (such as zoning or pairing)?
3. If the proof by qualified and disinterested experts
in the educational field demonstrates that greater
desegregation will be brought about by continuation
and reasonable modification of the freedom of choice
plan, as compared to geographical zoning, pairing
or other procedures, because of the withdrawal of
white children from the public schools based upon
motivations other than racial discrimination, will
this be considered by the Court in determining which
plan ''promises meaningful and immediate progress
toward disestablishing state-imposed segregation''?
(All emphasis is supplied by writer unless otherwise
indicated.)
D. But if the Court does entertain the Motion, then:
1. Is it proper the court gore out and cut away from
the options available to the local districts
any application of Jefferson freedom of choice or
Jefferson freedom of choice modified (as to solici-
tation of transfer by school officials) through ex
mero motu action of the court?
2. Did the District Court, with sufficiently explicit
direction, require faculty integration?
E. Are Movants entitled to attorney's fees as a result of
their precipitous action in filing this motion (in their capacity
as ''private attorneys general'') before those having official
responsibility have appealed?
1X,
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
The motion before the court grows out of a lawsuit filed
August 29, 1967, by the NAACP Legal Defense Fund against the three
school districts serving Yazoo County, Mississippi, which are:
3S
(1) The Yazoo City Separate Municipal School District,
which is limited to the corporate limites of the town.
(2) The Yazoo County School District, hereafter called
County District, which includes all the county out-
side Yazoo City, save the extreme western portion of
the county that is a part of the following district.
(3) The Holly Bluff Line Consolidated School District
of Yazoo County and Sharkey County, Mississippi,
hereafter called Holly Bluff District.
This brief is that of the County and Holly Bluff Districts.
Both districts are entirely rural and have a far greater Negro
school population than white school population (see Exhibits
"A" and "B" which detail this population). The County achieved
substantial integration during 1968-69 in its two permanent
formerly white schools. (See Exhibits '"C'" and "D" hereto).
Holly Bluff is the smallest, most isolated district in the
state, is purely agricultural, and is an island between the
swamps of the Yazoo and Sunflower Rivers, The two districts
should be considered together in measuring progress toward
desegregation; for the County must lead the way, Holly Bluff
follow. A summary of the history of integration in the two
districts is attached as Exhibit "E".
After the extensive hearings held by the District Judges,
it was found that these districts have not attempted to evade
their task, which, since Green in May, 1968, has at last been
made clear by the courts. We paraphrase the language in
Montgomery, June 2, 1969, 37 LW 4461, 4464:
"Each district recognized their affirmative responsibility
to provide a desegregated, unitary and non-racial school
system. They recognized their responsibility to assign
teachers without regard to race so that schools throughout
the system are not racially identifiable by their faculties,"
lm
The history of the evolution of attitude on the part of the
County and of the Holly Bluff District is meticulously set
out by resolutions of the respective districts introduced into
evidence and made Exhibits "F" and "G" hereto. All evidence
presented to the trial court, indeed the only evidence the
court would hear, was directed to whether the plans were working
and to what acceptable alternative plans (educationally,
reasonably sound) were available.
These are not easy questions. They involve matters of
great public moment. The motion of the Legal Defense Fund
attacks the good faith of the district judges. This aspect of
the motion is particularly unwarranted and deserves castigation,
When these cases receive the consideration they deserve, an
examination of the record will show the penetrating questions
and the stern exortations to duty of the district judges, who
sought to secure from provincial lawyers constructive thought,
aidful in reaching constructive conclusions,
Many of the districts are entirely rural and of limited
financial means. The court consolidated the causes for hearing
and allowed the testimony offered in the Hinds County case to be
considered in all. The court rendered one Opinion dated May 13,
1969, amended by Order Making Additional Findings May 29, 1969.1
This Opinion governed and determined the rights of litigants in
twenty-five school cases involving thirty-three school systems.
Orders pursuant to the Opinion were entered as to each separate
defendant on May 16, 1969. In making the additional findings
under the opinion, the court stated the findings required no
change or amendment to the Order dated May 16, 1969.
lye have no way of knowing, since copies of exhibits to
Motion for Summary Reversal were not furnished, whether a copy of the Order of May 29, 1969, making additional findings, was
furnished to the court,
“5
iI,
ARGUMENT
A. Where the opinion appealed from includes and
rules the case of eighteen defendant school
districts, in addition to the seven school
districts brought before the court by Motion
for Summary Reversal, will the Court hear such
Motion where such eighteen additional defendants
are not before the Court but will be later brought
before the Court in the orderly course of appeals,
notices of appeal in such cases having been filed?
As stated above, the opinion governs twenty-five cases
governing thirty-three school systems. Only seven cases and
nine school systems are brought before the court on this Motion
for Summary Reversal. These are the cases in which the Legal
Defense Fund represents some plaintiffs. In certain of these
seven cases, the United States also represents some of the
plaintiffs. The United States alone represents the plaintiffs
in the remaining nineteen cases involving twenty-four school
districts not now before the court. In footnote 2 on page 2
of their Motion, the Legal Defense Fund admits:
"This Motion for Summary Reversal is filed by private
Plaintiffs only. The decision appealed from, however,
disposed of all motions for new plans of desegregation
pending in_the district court, including eighteen
[nineteen?/ such motions filed in suits wherein the
United States is the plaintiff."
The United States has filed notice of appeal. As hereafter set
out, important questions, properly and constructively relevant
to school desegregation, arise on the record and are common to
each and every one of these cases. See Order for Consolidation
made Exhibit "H" hereto. When, in the performance of his public
duty, the appeal by the Attorney General is before the court on
the record, are the rights of the litigants to be governed by
the finding of the court on this motion? If not, will these
seven cases be denied the hearing allowed those subject to
appeal by the Attorney General?
“6
The law requires an appeal not be perfected piecemeal.
It will not be twice considered. The Cyclopedia of Federal
Procedure, Section 58.26 provides:
"An appellant is required to bring into the appeal
as appellees all adversary parties directly interested
in the result of the appeal and who will be affected
thereby, since they are entitled to notice and an
opportunity to be heard, and the appellate court should
not be required to consider the case piecemeal.”
Wilson vs. Kiesel, 164 U.S. 248, 41 L. Ed. 422, 17
S. Ct, 124; Davis vs, Mercantile Trust Co., 152 U,S.
590, 38 L. Ed. 563, 14 S. Ct, 693; Bloomington vs,
Watson, 218 F. 268; Kidder vs, Fidelity Ins., 105 F. 821,
In 4 C,J.S. (8391 Appeal & Error), page 1326, it is provided:
"Since there can be no appeal without an appellant
and an appellee, and because an appellant court will
not consider an appeal on the merits unless all of
the parties necessary to a final determination of
the controversy are before the court, it is almost
universally recognized that every party to the record
who has any interest that would be directly affected
by a determination in an appellate review must be
made a party to the review proceedings, and given
notice of the proceedings and an opportunity to be
heard in defense of his rights. Thus, it is a general
rule of appellate practice and procedure that all
persons who were parties to the action in the court
below who will be affected by, or who are interested
in, the judgment, order, or decree, that is, all
parties who are interested in sustaining or main-
taining the judgment or decree, or who will be affected
by a reversal or modification of the judgment or decree,
even though they filed no pleadings, must be made
parties to the appellate proceedings, and they must
be made parties either as appellants or plaintiffs
in error, or as appellees, respondents, or defendants
in error.
"The purpose of the general rule has been stated as being
that the successful party may be at liberty to enforce
his judgment, decree, or order without delay against
those parties who do not desire to have it reversed,
and that the appellate court may not be required to
decide the same question more than once on the same
record,
"Although under some statutes and court rules the contrary
is held, it is generally considered that the rule is
not a question resting in the discretion of the appellate
court, but is a fundamental question of jurisdiction,
which cannot be waived by the parties or disregarded
by the appellate court, and the latter has no power
to hear and determine a case unless all the parties
directly affected by the judgment or decree are brought
before it."
LJ
* ot’
B. On Motion for Summary Reversal, will the court
proceed where no copies of Exhibits'A'" through
"L" have been furnished counsel for appellees
as required by Rule 25 of the Rules of Appellate
Procedure?
Appellees assume from the language of the Motion, a copy
of the Order Making Additional Findings, dated May 29, 1969, was
not furnished to the court as a part of the Motion for Summary
Reversal. But no copy of Exhibit "A" was furnished and we do
not know. See footnote 1, page 1 of Motion. Also no copies
of Exhibits "B" through "H" were furnished, which are represented
to be copies of the Orders in each case. See page 2 of Motion.
We assume the copies of the Orders are correct; but, if so,
the quotation therefrom on page 9 of the Motion for Summary
Reversal, under Point IV, is misleading, as is more fully set
out infra,
The duty is upon the Movant to file with the clerk and
serve upon counsel opposite copies of all papers so filed.
See Affidavit of Counsel attached as Exhibit "I",
C. Where three District Judges sat en banc and heard
twenty-five school cases, involving thirty-three
school systems, in hearings extending over several
weeks, including testimony of numerous expert
witnesses, will the court entertain a Motion for
Summary Reversal where the following questions, not
heretofore appearing in Adams, Greenwood, Clarksdale
Marshall County, Indianola or Hall, are raised on
appeal from the District Court's opinion and cannot
be fairly weighed without careful consideration
of the record? Said questions being:
b
1. Where Freedom of Choice, as prescribed by
Jefferson, is working save for failure to
infuse white students into formerly Negro
schools or Negroes into white schools in
desired numbers, will a modification of
the freedom of choice plan be given a
further chance (where school officials
have been prevented by the terms of the
plan itself from encouraging students
to enroll in any particular school) and
the plan be modified, through ex mero
action of this court, to allow school
officials to encourage white students to
attend formerly Negro schools and Negroes
to attend formerly white schools if needful
to the success of the plan?
Bw
This response cannot fully develop this aspect of the
appeal. Time will not allow that effort, and the record is
not before the court. But we say the record will clearly
demonstrate:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
The County and Holly Bluff Districts (and each
other district appearing as a respondent before
the district court) have embraced their duty under
Brown and Green. The district court said:
"In these cases so much progress has been
made in the attitude and cooperation of
the parents, children and teachers that
they are entitled to much credit and com-
mendation of the Court as good citizens
who wish to comply with all of the require-
ments of the law, and to lay aside any
inbred and ingrained former adverse opinions
about the operation of a unitary school
system,"
The constructive effort of the extensive hearings was
to find how the plans of desegregation were working
and what further plan or modification of plans could
realistically work now and promise meaningful and
immediate progress,
Time and time again, the monolithic black school
appeared as the principal problem facing the districts.
As was said by the court:
"All of these schools complain of the provisions
in the model decree which denies the school author-
ities the right to persuade parents and children’
to transfer to schools of the opposite race. The
facts in this case show that all of these schools
have very faithfully obeyed that injunction of
the Court, No school board member or teacher or
representative of any school has tried to influence
any child or any parent to send any child to any
school predominantly of the opposite race. But
it is the oft repeated law in this Circuit that
the school board (and nobody else) has the non-
delegable duty to adopt a plan which will conform
to all of the requirements of the model decree
and to see that such plan works. Every school
official who testified in every one of these
cases before the Court testified convincingly
before this Court that this provision of this
=O
model decree had interfered with a fair
and just and proper operation of the freedom
of choice plan in these schools. Yet, like
Prometheus (chained to a rock) these schools
are ordered by the Court to shoulder this
very positive and important duty of desegre-
gating these schools while the Court denies
them the right to counsel with and persuade
parents to let their children enter a school
predominantly of the opposite race,"
On full hearing, the school districts expect to demonstrate
the need to modify Jefferson to allow constructive solicitation
by school officials of pupil transfer so as to overcome the
monolithic black schools,
2, When a school district is, in good faith, applying
a freedom of choice plan which is making progress
toward affectuating a transition to a unitary system,
to what extent may the district court consider the
testimony of qualified disinterested experts who
found that: (a) greater desegregation will be achieved
and (b) much better public education secured through
freedom of choice as compared to some plan of forced
desegregation (such as zoning or pairing)?
No more important question, bearing upon the welfare of
the republic, can come before this court. The lawyers and the
school board members they represent (the unpaid public servants
who bear so heavya burden) clearly demonstrate through the
record in these cases that they are attempting to exercise that
due care in the obedience of the Constitution which will take
education out of the courthouse and return it to the schoolhouse.
(See Duval County, No. 25479, August 29, 1968.) Having assumed
this new and unsolicited burden, they are entitled to a hearing
of this most important question; which is well developed in the
record, at high cost in public tax dollars and in time of
school officials. That educational excellence in the public
schools is to be considered along with Movant's demands is
pointed up by Judge Black in Montgomery, 37 LW 4461; 4465 where
he said:
"Despite the fact that the individual plaintiffs in
this case have with some reason argued that Judge
Johnson should have gone further to protect their
rights than he did, we approve his order as he
«10~
wrote it. This, we believe is the best courfe
we can take in the interest of the plaintiffs
and the public school system of Alabama.’
3. If the proof by qualified and disinterested
experts in the educational field demonstrates
that greater desegregation will bei)rought
about by continuation and reasonable modifica-
tion of the freedom of choice plan, as compared
to geographical zoning, pairing or other procedures,
because of the withdrawal of white children from
the public schools based upon motivations other
than racial discrimination, will this be considered
by the Court in determining which plan ''promises
meaningful and immediate progress toward dis-
establishing state-imposed segregation''?
The lawyers on this brief well know disagreement with the
law or withestablished constitutional principal cannot be
allowed to affect the courts -- indeed must be anathema when
argued to the court, This we do not do. What we say to the
court is:
The quality of education resulting from alternative plans
of desegregation, each plan reasonably meeting the tests of
Brown and Green, must be considered by the court in determining
which plan will realistically work now and promise meaningful
and immediate progress, As a related precept, reason teaches
us, a plan, which is efficient for desegregation but which is
educationally unsound, will not ever realistically work nor
promise meaningful and immediate progress. This is not a racial
question. Please read the thought provoking editorial from the
Saturday Review of February 19, 1966, a copy of which is made
Exhibit "J" hereto. Before Brown many thoughtful parents were
dissatisfied with the educational and moral results of attendance
at some public schools. The average citizen counts himself a
free man. If he does not violate the law, he may live where and
how his wealth or diligence and ability allows. The freedom of
the citizen to avoid a situation the citizen finds educationally
disastrous for his children must be considered if meaningful,
“1 1«
effective, realistic, feasible, or practicable disestablishment
of the dual system is ever to be achieved. This question is
fairly and properly developed on the record in these cases.
With reference to all the matters treated under this Paragraph
C, we refer the court to what Chief Justice designate Burger?
said, dissenting in Hobson, 408 F(2d) 197 (1969):
"Several commentators have expressed views which under-
grid what Judge DANAHER has said as to the need for
caution and restraint by judges when they are asked to enter
areas so far beyond judicial comptence as the subject
of how to run a public school system, We have little
difficulty taking judicial notice of the reality that
most if not all of the problems dealt with in the District
Court findings and opinion are, and have long been, much
debated among school administrators and educators. There
is little agreement on these matters, and events often
lead experts to conclude that views once held have lost
their validity."
This reasoning applies to the situation existing in these thirty-
three school systems covered by the District Court's opinion,
nine of which are now before the court on this Motion for Summary
Reversal. Respectfully, we ask judicial restraint, and the
allowance of a full hearing. To summarily deal with this appeal,
without all parties being before the court and when questions of
such moment are presented by a record laboriously compiled
through fair trial but which is not before the court is to destroy
the due processes of law and to place these school cases in a
new posture that finds no parallel -- unless it be the conduct
of Chief Justice Jeffrey's commission of 1685, known now as
the Bloody Assizes, or the excesses of even earlier religious
persecutions.
D. But if the Court does entertain the Motion, then:
1. Is it proper the court gore out and cut away
from the options available to the local dis-
tricts any application of Jefferson freedom
of choice or Jefferson freedom of choice modi-
fied (as to solicitation of transfer by school
officials) through ex mero motu action of the court?
2 The full text of Judge Burger's dissenting opinion is
attached as Exhibit "K".
-12~-
The County and Holly Bluff Districts know they have not
completed their task =-- that they have not eliminated the last
vestiges of the former de jure school systems. When they read
Green, they knew additions to their freedom of choice plan are
necessary if they are to accomplish Green's goal. Please see
Exhibits "F" and '"G'" hereto. These exhibits show defendants
without waiting for any action by Movants had already formulated
additions to their freedom of choice plan,
The districts have their problems in moving forward =-- not
the least of the problems being that the Movants will not leave
the Districts in peace long enough for them to marshall their
thoughts and money to efficiently attack the task the courts
have finally made clear in and following Green.
These two districts ask they not be denied the right to
use freedom of choice, along with other plans and projects,
to reach the goal of a unitary system.
Respectfully, the shrill cry of Movants (for the destruction,
at one fell blow, of freedom of choice in all these districts)
is the cry of wreckers not builders. It is time the citizens
who have responsibility as school board members were allowed to
work at their task,
In Hall the court said:
"We are urged by appellants to order on a plenary
basis for all these school districts that the district
court must reject freedom of choice as an acceptable
ingredient of any desegregation plan. Unquestionably
as now constituted, administered and operating in these
districts freedom of choice is not effectual. The
Supreme Court in Green recognized the general in-
effectiveness of freedom of choice. But in that case,
concerning only a single district having only two
schools, the court declined to hold 'that freedom
of choice can have no place in ... a plan' that
provides effective relief, and recognized that there
may be instances in which freedom of choice may
serve as an effective device, and remanded to the
district court with directions to require the board
to formulate a new plan."
13
2. Did the District Court, with sufficiently explicit
direction, require faculty integration?
The Legal Defense Fund states on page 9 their motion:
"Judge Cox's order provides only:
In order to insure /complete faculty integration/
by the 1970-71 school year, defendants shall achieve
substantial faculty and staff desegregation by the
1969-70 school year."
This is misleading. The Order of the District Court provided:
"That defendants shall take positive and affirmative
steps to achieve complete desegregation of school
faculties so that by the 1970-71 school year the
pattern of teacher assignments to each school is not
identifiable as tailored for a heavy concentration
of either Negro or white pupils. In order to insure
full compliance by the commencement of the 1970-71
school year, defendant s shall achieve substantial
faculty and staff desegregation by .the 1969-70 school
year,"
The time is desparately short for the goal of 1970-71. The target
of faculty desegregation set out for 1969-70, and all future years,
is sufficiently specific.
E. Are Movants entitled to attorney's fees as a
result of their precipitous action in filing
this motion (in their capacity as "private
attorneys general'') before those having official
responsibility have appealed?
The suit was filed August 29, 1967. Two months and ten days
later, through cooperation with the Legal Defense Fund, Jefferson
orders were entered, On July 14, 1968, Motion for Supplemental
Relief was filed but never noticed. On July 31, 1968, Movants
filed Notice of Appeal from the docket setting by the district
court of a hearing on that motion. When that hearing came on, the
District Court, in due course, rendered its opinion and order,
the latter on May 16, 1969. Now the Legal Defense Fund has
again filed its Motion for Summary Reversal. These districts
have been doing their best and are going to continue to do their
best to comply with Green, There is no basis for the request for
attorney's fees, and Movants know Cato, Kelly, Rolfe and Bell,
“lb
cited pages 14 and 15 their Motion, do not apply to these
districts. Rather, the districts, who have been put to expense
as a result of a patently abortive motion which does not bring
all parties in interest before the court, are the aggrieved
parties. The abilities of the average school board, expressed
in money and manpower, are limited. Since August, 1968, much
of the strength and energy of these boards has been consumed
in litigation. If these boards, and other similarly situated,
are to ''exercise that due care in the obedience of the constitution
which will take education out of the courthouse and return it
to the schoolhouse', they must have some relief from harassment
by zealots.
I1I.,
CONCLUSION
Until all parties affected by this Motion are before the
court, the court is without jurisdiction and the Motion for
Summary Reversal should be dismissed.
Respectfully,
\
Walter R. Brid
Bridgforth & Love
Post Office Box 48
Yazoo City, Mississippi
Satterfield, Shell, Wi¥liams & Buford
’ Post Office Box 446
/ Yazoo City, Mississippi
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANTS
“15
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing Motion
to Dismiss and Response to Motion for Summary Reversal and
Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss and Response Thereto
were served on appellants on this 18th day of June, 1969, by
mailing copies of same, postage prepaid, to their counsel of
record at the last know address as follows:
Melvyn R, Leventhal
Reuben V. Anderson
Fred L. Banks, Jr.
538% North Farish Street
Jackson, Mississippi 39202
Jack Greenberg
Jonathan Shapiro
Norman Chachkin
Suite 2030
10 Columbus Circle
New York, New York
Walter R. Briffforsh
a i
J ’
v ' Ld
DANTAT AAVDAQTHITAN OAT QMOUMTANT RANDY ATMPINTD TC
aC AVE. RE COMPOS LL LON OF SLUDENYT BUDDY ALLLALNDING
i P. QOMNODOTS \ 15) MATTITNVY NAT TQITD Tam
wn ty ortend SCHOOL ~~ vd CVU ANL L UU LL RT TRIG a BUI WOR
wy Madea 3%) ~ £ EU. BID, Trae WL Rng. dels Var sAas NAT
pS + Dchl. number Ou STCUAents atiending Viis i UV count
District:
rr > - - oS . ey . y Po ITAA “11rn ” AP ert da adsad mantra Ades am JS a ae
ve oe \/ EJ. number Vi Wadde © > Gen ts (SA VEVISH #16 TN SI PFCN
UC TE, a er ~~ NT WATTLES IRS, Se agi! de oe ny 3 on
1 ” - 1 IN eg ££ ~ oS 1 Y 3 < «< a ~ ol
aL onuabhe Vd PO SUA ellUs aC Lend ir 2 oO
’
As
¥ O
a) Parecantaoge I SY TT +ha +aota
“oe a rcern SHC Cilio vO Viis cO val
y
re ANT ooo ~~ ~~ re SY ve
A
41 o Ol WALlTE students TO total Cill
- - ~~ rf aT IROL
wrade Ll, LO
: 2% 4 . Slave ava An Athen athnt a ora he 1 TY
wll ale NU ONCY CLL E00] PS tha Lill
- ’ FE vde at ie ~ ‘ ~ EEE ae aa aN 1377 Pe Te Lo Arnsr 7 TN a f ok rata la
LIL SUDSTEaANolal numbers. Lily CIiL ollees Ol etic
vr . -~ “ vf + - —
mim Toy ay (OV A7ve 17Ne 191500 aa whl ™ 70 Wo Po, i
LilGll NCEL'VU QAlC LUC LUUCU Qo white Snrolices., Ames
- ~ ™ - . i ; oh YAEL VIA dn on’ pum oF OT YS png oS 5 7
oalalice (ONS Vel cen va LR oh bude ollees he hod NEEL Ve
a
«yo
~~
said
PR
ell ny rollmen 2 4
ay hg HOT Cg
~OLiMENT OY
J
py y ~ Pa ve
Sed DS OLIIeY
~~ —— ~~
ee WW Oda WLC
Eh ele he -~
hed dD Calc
2
“-p ~m ~~ AN ETN
CNNTTANST OY ~
{rem a nA
pW Jo JR ET A |
hed Wh AN NY dnd “A a nied
IR TRIM Ne EN EL WAV LINER Y
Peps 7 ~~
daVadida &AdUL A ad tr ¥ snd \ ‘ i / \ 3 “ RY
7 {)
led NSN
1 Aral VITAE PE TRE. J a TI ve
-——Q mA uCead, LAQUILIVCL Ud ww LURUCLAIVD Valo hd de =
fancalidated School Distri
VC0WVILo ULLAL UG VOW Lidl VU LL Udo bd oo
Lr dp] ”,
a 4
~ Mada Ira A ve TE YT, fe vy He and A
Cv oe - WW UCLA AANVICL ded he V7 Nr Ww VLC ii VvD Qu Uo Cv da \L
oo FTV mole *t ny eA 2S - ~ +L NTA ore ony NS Wa pony ~~ ~ Ral ed oo = ~ arnhhae “ oo
Noe LOouval LIU CL Od NCH L UU OO ULUUUTILLE GU LVhlildils wwii wm LLldUUV LID o
=
:
: “ ' y 4 : y - - - f ae
JN SR Be SE SN ala a= I "7 Ee er
“eo o CRA C il vio (PA Vad Vuh ddd VAddidT ll VU
!
- /
~ J
.
A yo cis ~ a ol yy
° ow eet AR aw WALSALL ww ~J
RE aI
- WAN WY
I 0% 5 Sov Gn Ne — hr
Cul No Cw @ Fa. oe od
ly rr ~~ ~ Lr
\ FX " - - Gogh Qo 19 8 w-Sp INI f2
' P
rg we FL IR Te oY we o
Je
-
Je
»
i ¥ na Cpf
pT Yea iF 7.
Le Cv { eo Ad
ON mn ~~
a we ew a No
"a
a Ll Bi, :
~~. - /
WA vo Nt © bar yur 7 J
- ~ - ~o/
7.4 Cul —— @ wh
~ 90 . P
a Cr ———
SITY os ay irs vv vi zs ale Tavs Sy YY Ey BAL IN Ir 2 yy
Teta h OC Ld LaNS [OL FRA wa CC Viiildo Fra VWIJO Cuii\d ANGEL WV Cilia Vad O\L
2 te I fo iy Tm o J EO A ha lance AF na AS
ta te Vaal ewe bo? Wh Wel 20 en CCl ns dl VGA LLY [ON FEE F358 4 w- 5° 2 1 AS LA
-~
PR he ih - AT em
add AJ tuts So is -—b? ANN. Je
TYVLIT)
1 Be <2
ALLOA 4 ES
; WA NN SEY WY ~~ pg (uy — a A - p— " pe— po A A yn a A ON ETT PN
We 0 0 AY JAA ld \J . NS LN , WB hs odo VALS, i J p . JN \A hae dS - WLS JAA Ar Ll ated
Il A CT Ph en ~~ oS Pa LEI (rpg Spa poy hes aloe on un pnd oN se wn wi Tn FAT METRE. So CN pm IA AA >
ie & de WUC Lal C LL | WR w ULC LL VD Cw Uli da Vado LUCLaVVLialh WL AIlVVLL 6
ON PN PN To avle YAN NY I wy ~ Py a - [SR “my CE CN REP SN. JENS on -y - —~
i - ) % - ' ~ - ~ yr < . 1 Ld
“we -— -- adh a had WN ~ WV RANA Nr Ll VW Cv UV Vinal end LS ei ae A WANA ANS Ve
In trai at a Ve brik aon ro. ~~ AA “i ~ ~~ Nn
PEER TESS HL WN Va > ww VUNLCLILVD GWU UC Laldl Sr
- ra el a ~ \ . .~ - PA ~ ny I SR em ~ —— ro { oy WA
“ee — a WOALWCLEL,C Ud PARR ~ WLC LLU O (TL (PPE Len VU LUCA CllLl VLU LIL LV
- - ’ -
~~ myn 4 ” a -~ ~
SU OV KUCIIUVDS ve LULGL Cll OOLLUICTILL VY
al a ae
| SEES TT) A —— ———
" / "yr
ee CNL Le © | i
" pe ~ —r
- ~» - Ja -
\ ne ) Nr — \ J lm o Jj
~ wr
A — CAL -r oe —
/
i §
|W SE 0) Wh @ —— v -
re x - - oy
LOPE GF) OI \“/ & )
“7 - 4
@ i
~
(SPREE SVL NJ oe
- spill - -~
LOE We) WF A or he J J
i oe CAL —
th —— NA /
i ~ ~ - ~y
iw Cu ns lee @
p— rT ~ 1
adil dd Aud J
hd w - W/L Ved ee ov Nhe ~~ - /
—————— Ee ———————————————————————
——————_————
- M1 J i, “9
- - py - J ng, - { ~ VT
FTL N= I A, d nA AAT -
QA .
—— — SN AY de baa A Nr LSS ww Vd de Vie
LW JER Ld Wha de
2
ITA om a -~, =r. ~ > ln we IR. Say "yw om ~~ wm A ~ od ~ SANA M
“ve - LC edi © Ua WW dd de WN om WLLL CLL Vio Cw UV UO LANA eda oo? Co A ww Cad V ee
a Ph ny nw AAR EN A ey + \T - Fa 7 5, MR . yp on JU. J, SRG Te oF mm A yn a " .
nN oe — NN de oe tbo Nt a he Po WR WE WR RRA VL wv VW UNC La na a no Cv mie NA Ne REA TE
\
.
pu
~ a? * A - —~ -p -~ ~
— J J " tl
New — oe Ne Srl WS \~
Ned
-— CAA ¢
A — La br J
- {
. —r } & o \7 JJ
~ -~/ /
8 ER i —— JY
-~ J
—- — A A
- ra ;
i Ao © Rw / ha SU
,
> ~
Nov “ St “ —
Ny wr a Ne’ Ww —
/
» - \
\ -— or Je
ude (Wd —_— @ / J
1 v \~ E e J/¥
,
- - a Fa /
i — va —— — [0
i CNA Ne —— ©
hk i -_ BE | BL
~ po —— ~ . pe — OTT NAY
LEAL J Ng. WAL LIU U LL Fu dl ul Be
a ————— RO SA
~ - No ~ - . ye or pr ” QAN ~~ "ArT A ATA AT 5 ITTY
Vas -— JJ LAAN Aad CULT LLG oA ahba¥y
-
[J Sevd A .
iF O
Node —— NJ
.
AN wd a) IN da Do LN aN / we ahd, JUL TULA
wv.’ - . - fou 3 a gf PLA ~~ f=
WW ALLNS "1 y mh bd Ce AL dL w— WS AL LAL AL VELA WO
; ~ 7 . - - ~ ~~ for mm w- “+ ~~
Pe SRS RW LW Sw | V dee Wd idWLd OV \ wd. Chad de Ol de TAL
a ee a Yr Ae °
7 he PR “t oo " al ni ray wn = J NE 7 SUR pny J
0) ? 2 Y ) } & :
he wh de Ce _— . br he i 4 he de Sa Sr ln — dh Se J i LE iy
- wp - . . ~ y o de mm ~ boyy
WALL \ LAV OL OD oe up Ad hiCVILA CO She LAN NVA
~ 7 -
a F
~~ ‘
- JUL)
Clini
“ Cd 5 wei — iJ Lili GLI DOCLILCULLA °
~~ - pn fe om PP papa "NY 7
Foy Cs oe A NLL J “— CALA LLC
lo
rp . -— FT ANAT
. "on wey meng wt my ya ee i 7 NT STV TN PT
oe A A AU AA —————————
- AY MAdili.cll Y J da CAAA rW
o £
Lvl a oe oe Nene
~ A n~ PO ~~ ~vy + |] ) | } { (2 a [ QO) Nk Ae AC A \ Le sl BD § wp Bp SY a id
fel “TL oe
oa SII
~ - \
w J J 7
" N " - m °
- ~ . a - we ~ ey eT ANTS
ee - wo _~ LL lr an Xo Ae al VUL
oo
we J " B Vill ia dA De Ln
- - - - °
PR ~ . —~ “7 -~ oT . ~ (y -
“ ad NS a CA tn 4 - e — . LA dd - el
- . - -~ " ~ f= dn oy - Fo ~ ~ AY
. - Cho “J Wa “4 “J Ch ve de
a {i= 11
JRMRAT WN Nal ~ & Ne JNJ wh \ — -— ha LAC no? ade -— Sn Ca J Asal P 4 OF Swe Jw INS Sw J Se JOR BER BRS J Vv & “a 3 . 7-3 I vi
— de — ud Se NJ — — Cd 4 ANI da aN AA A ode Caan de ae
N . . . . ; x p - p~ x -
- PE a ~ Me Lm wy - ~ R -~ R7 Er ~~
i [ari SI GL WPS 8 | a 5 Sed JNA WAL Ee aa br ad Se - CL LUN She
- my dy - m—~ Ee Rate: o =e JERE 2. dm pe ~ 5 ug - de Val = ha
— nt Sr he Je A Bind Ar dn Sts Nai Diy Be A — wd Crier bw du Nd dd he hen / LS —— he 0 thal
Bato Yo = J ORR, Se 3 EPL TL a - ~~ do Ta A A a Tr han A a -
et wh a Ne CL ee Nr 2 i No de — Ly J NTT het he bd er de AN
a en 3 Poe hve Bi Hw Be an ChaaNa
- “Ny 3 Lo mT RETR a ~ oy EL a a ~~ AA eo
ad JA el Se AA ee NS -—d NS Cm NA — Ne LE NSS LE AEE Dd oS LANNY we WY
~ I " - 4 a an ¢ de ~ ~ ~ ay A fe alan vm -~ ~ I ~ a rn Ho a
v EE LT J Cll dll Lvl vu Com law di — << —_— hw J Ses i RL Wl § § 4 wp ig a (YQ JIN Cad -
SW Se 38 JE TO LO = i
JO0LICY [OP
~ -~ "
AEE End a Te ak TS 7. ~~ -
JF en Z [WR RG WD By Wl Sp #9 od ce I ode
pS Sw Be B90 IG Be S05 I Ps
~ FE TE NY ~ " mT -— or y gx 3. err i» ~ = RP TEP SE I ~~ =
Ny \SY wh de ed Lt J p dod ed -— od WY Ch LUC Qi Val Uo
y 5 of
~ La, - wen J ve a ~ om ra i ofa NYT TO emnnai ec Km aE Ele py i
“ \/ Jha Y a a Sd? od ay dd ff SA, ne Sn nn — ll VY LLL lads UNL NO _— hall Lid oA
o nfl » Pp —
a aN Se td <li ia SR RPE LEN a Nol h Ep J TRAM AD EE de © SFA A
Fo 108 1G ws At. ales “alle a2 Na AVIAN Go W Al. Ld llia oy le de ee Nt de AVAL
- ye Le Sem Fr — - Tm - ~ - N oy - - are - ~ oink c Pa ten
- . on SS Se J es Sad Nr - - dd > eT Se Vode — a See WS i fa P
, -A a — ad A Nee No —_~ — hn NN ae [rip Sp A 4 CLs WAV Alo VV de LS SP GW
J
kA \ . — Ci lili y Awe ah tL - Cole we LULA OD 5 0 Lilo CLV OO Chill
- —— od a WG rl Nt hn - tt Se . - do we WW de de WWW NL [Spa
- . . - 3- 3 Li py =m \ an \ - " -— ~ = \ ~ x7 OA mY (8 ~ fn - ~~
- of w— J & Ne — LEE Bd A NN LAN ee - nh ~~. NV nN Sr Ne ~~ x AAAS LAAN al WV a Sr hd or
- J -~a — ao ed JALIL it Al Ch AALS Whale dl Se LAL ~
oo - / 4 7
AD Sw Lio WAY JSR WYP i = -l le wT GR wl — he Wud hn wi he
pay § . 30 TE | a I SL SP ip BS ERR } du — —- So Fo NL . Cir a Vad wr ISP RL — J AliClL Adi Cl nad
: pe had — ———— ” e 4 -
- - - " - ~ gn ~~ ” —_ o - . - | age - ‘ee oy -— a - wy ol Pp ~ oP ii i . T= em am
4 Ie Sr Nn le Nl ade [WJ NPI GL WL NO ay J C ~~ tn Ly lo Ea a Nm CL ae OF ee Ne UL G Wedd La Cl A A V5 0 4 Wh SEI Sa SN
RN .
« a IAL ale te Nett Wd ie Ba ia PoASRY a Naf da —— NER NR YES Wie W AN A Lala 7 ngs BR 0 or wh
oo &
- Le pn - ~~ - - Po - - tw La Ye - - ~~~ I~ ON AN ema
ah ae ~ 4 ‘5 | SO ~~ Wea GLa “Lis et A hs a Ne Pal Wp SPE WPL WI oY oll
’ IS I~
ol Ca . a - ~~ Wd fo) 5 < = (WJ AV lisabalual e Lrg ~— nd UAL LULL “iad
| First
ogy 7 Tk i a Pav © JN la VV am a CL Ld Se Ld — a — Na Ch a BE SE a a ia — — e J bod a od
oS
oO
Ch & dL Cl} 7 de Lio ) 4 Va Casllid LG We UVilo LL Le IED 30 BR SA da La Aj Ch du? CLI VA de -_—
- - o
o
h- - -~ Ll
~- a Jl hl AN whe AAV AL (WSS he ho 4 Sr J nl an Sor Ne WI ri — ah JIN Cl Ae 4 Chiii— J ted Se
— -a ld i rw a ALILAL Ad | ali ails “— \/ Ba Ad de de ef WY | Sp JNJ A A Aa ~ fe or LL nd
w) # — (4 Ci WY Nr a Ai bt J eo JI CL ae WAAL aL HP he x a A dui A hin — A VV
Fay 8 de A -— at VV mii dl Alia or me or dL hl LW J -— an J . ald dad ww re | tS deo VW AY GL aN bd Nr
(6
J ll J
haCl dm hii at Vf hea Cie we Laan Nd wh Ce ha JoUCG dt »
y
- a _-— ~ - . p- -~ - - - ~~
- A - ”
~ © . a Cl add de ANS Ge dee Nr Aa hr CL ~a / a a SS de A de ahh te Co br Sr NL
Vey r
/
UP PLE Sw — id oT —V as f i, Al Se igh Wa \ - daa \ -y hd dd ad Ch ae a ee ode J Ja ALAS A 5. J A. [a NS Wpaps
— -_— —t Foe Nl WSL ~ ee Nt . J a it Ae nm PRP tee CL se whe J he whee of Nd wl
Ce " I VV — LS ae Ne ~ V ee od wr - a WAN a SRE We Wd | J 5 LAS 0 de adh
Ch ~ a a
Co we i Jaks he Sot [) V A ae Gh md ee < - sl lh Sri WL 2 he A te Sr od de Sor IL CL AA A4
o -
/ ~~’
, Wig MT ~ - - RZ nvr 5 1 ; PE ne Sry ™ - . AT rere O ~~ YT ED ~e EYY
“a SN - / \/ 2 we (Sp . it NS J rr J CAA dae bd Cn — Ww ids UV 2 VY L Led VN
of
- -~
4 J
~ " ~ ~ 4 - i - ~ ‘ om —~ fy ay ue - 3 ~~ wm ta
Nae: ahr . ches LW ~h Co we — te nd he -— Ne V - “we JN PN 1 — tr al Nae CL — Nh ad |S WL NP Lil
of
-— aka 5 NP WR Se I TR ahd [ oe dvd §¥
o
a A Li — iil. oo a, W Ch ¥ WN EW, eed wy Li NC be AS ALCE a MAuooUl las Vas oe NF ae
o
oo rt La V Cima — — Al ahs J me de Se vo, of i en - — Ch a ad Nr dn Sm LAN — Naa SA whe — de aa
& [a
\ - ‘AS J ’ | WLR RL J a “ \J/ Je ge 3 oo’ bt ad a hy wy wn So ha A —
“rt J ASE Mic Rep WISE 20 1 5 ho he a ile Ad SNA 12 Pon BR ed 2 oe 1 el 0) 1 OU Jae clil
a
= p
-
J ’ . de tv A LE i - Ch nd Nee W de br mals or Nord dV ALJ du a ACh Aa PY awa Ld
~— VV ~ — aa Neer ut LAAN AA Nr na ns ~ — yd - “ “- he — aan al a—— —— id Ao
-
J
- ¢
. oh ade bd JAS CA Pa JL NPL . . 2 CL id Wd — ~~ — ba Ne — Sd -— A he | SQ ~ Li
#3 . jE \/ Ae -— VV a A - hn de bn EN Wr ah re Ae « FW rw Se Le J tN
r
7
a a A - “ — Nea. — LA ALN Wide and J 8 VW de br ka ail oS de hn ee Sr Ne J dal VIALS
J on - - hy A “/ td Aas Ne ~ — he Pa a - — - SNe WON i tN St ad Ne ef de wien bf oa Ne No
- J (WINER PR Ca at J . ~ oy: re & a dn Bud — \J jp a ey be Ne (9 — Wal VY a ad? - < be
= wh - . a he 4 4 hob We AA aw 15 BF 2 J ed ~\J Ld ALCL ey ee) “il Fhe A i ACL LL
; WAL do be Ca Ll Sa — A Ae Ce LO . - po : pa be 0
~ N . v - hA Jobd L - y A WA . en AA 9 J dn G4 Of = VW ode Se Ld ET Ae S J a ad >)
\ - ~— Sr Sr J La \ — - oo’ Nu ‘ 4 be 4S od hn Nt Ah /
\ de J A J \ v - - . . de Eo © RW J wl Se i SR din Tae
ny - pith. - ~ . - . No - oN AV . v Je LAA hea dud Ad LA \.. he See 2
‘ b- Ca ee . wt he od Ch A . - i o whe — — ON ii o id “— V oo
- A be hy - hb ‘ v - - Ad A . - as J i Nee lid OLN SP Sa jt viet
J i J 3
- on 2h. ’ Adee . A — “i 8 “Lise wo dna hd
- [>
8 - “AN a - . 4 “ <a EE a "A J Sa [ - od Po LS SE “iis
- - — - - \ - ‘ v Ne 2 - a — a LA . a J/o Waid ao
Na - ’ No . - ~ Nr - . he de LAS LAN - / LE JV 4 - be Ch dhe or hd he DD Sd aun
‘ - Ns . 7 hd de V - - - LCL. a . 4 “/ A A VV da de de . Sar 4 wh
. - / — i AN A dee be Se we A . . iid . ALA — ha . ol PD LAUVUU L - — Aw
’ : — lJ LL W/L se ~— wh J 0 SN WAAL LLL A doe V hh ww NAA Lalli
. aS Powe LANA LL (LWA Wiad ae 4 V\ J de NN Ne Na wh be a
. Se — & . . Sa -\ he be A bh AN dn he ehh V ha dm = a 0 Sa
- . . - a v he wr AJ dew r Choe de Sr dd we A \/ IN » te 3 A 1 J Nh bee Rt ie —
des 7 Pan Bead
“J | So
™ AACA +t TA ~~ -
Ak | Se J ~~ |p § w -—t NS CL de Na Aa
} a - a Pon = N on ~ A T FN AO - oP or np i x alll - ~ PE a
[© LN) we 94 dod de de ll LlLaLC LL AD ALi oe A . Jel ULL LTC,
/ mm ~ rah ale lt a = Cli UL Ad
+ SN AAT a ALE CER a Jey Ba GE rs Ty Cv vm 2 Am vrs la Tne OD wep
Pol 8 heed CCL LVS bot Nao de X42, ULI LOGO vo TE I, Ado UL AL WC —\A dA with UL . AN dee AACE ANd
ce
- . -y -
die vt
PN - - am I Wn
E
{/ da GLa A Abie Lune Oo
L
- ’ 3 -4 - : - Pons 4
CO CITTYYYY TTL E NYY lo The al By I aT wl eb dad dem AYO
[ ACC A LOLhS dV LULL (SR Se A Wy I § wl Sa
~ - > -
ik
“OS. ~~ y vy ~ RE 0
\ - } f J { ne ~~ i] { J
JES Up Ny Cod LA Lidl JL ; e
fo fm oy Se ACO et V By a. A dll IT
i hh di Chioyhe ree Weld JE CUOINMIIiGiitl. LY
LJ
Fn oF
~ 1 Y ~~ »
Attar man | I~ Arn IN © - -~ 2 Ve ~~ Al alk = a ~ IN = x7 po
atiencec DY LHICLlUC Lo “- algo. Lili DLCOoCLIL UL | cCLLV Cond
: 1 WE, wa - @ % ~ x o . 3 d -
an =r f= im DN hala - Cs ~ dl on le Wa I a Te tad ~ - lea my ra ele hak Ba 7 —.~ - hi dl i Th id WL Tala)
ver gi, gl TA i ade ad WW <A de UL uns: ne | J SR Ce Ne CLA Lae de 5 J (SRP Midi dl LL oe Ch C he \J As Cole hd
3 ~ To 7 uo 2 ~ ~ ~ 4 | 3
"Nr a= alalnle hal T y* 3) ™y =) OmMmIrsansntT Lala Wa we Qo lal alaTe
hs J LeaCcners orn Lac DICQOM LL - el Lhd CS Quid OLIVA,
-
/ \ - - ~ — -
{ ~\ ~ 09 TN ~ ~ "mS —~ ~~ AS ATT ATTY NO
\- J -— AJ \4 is Be Nuke. tes show 4 de JD de Qaida Rf wn WN Ce A AAA A.
- a = nO OTS - “7 SI fo Lm Cm NS Oo “ Sm
Dated LiCl wo — nd ee LC VV de We hd dud ad hie bt Nae A AAD AL wd Por BAL ~\/
~~ ri ro . . 3 " . x
Ral alo al atas -" a 1 ot roniTive ~ NTT ~ pm a alo ike ke - la ~ el ak ee a a
hd de \J I de CAAA lorie } Ch ha Ll SA SR wl GPA TIS V J Se Wd A wd Ne LJ | SUS SR urs SE SS OF 5 SF WF 4 [Wy § dan? ede LLG
Is (o>
~ = i dom my Sy TN OY ~A Aas onon =~
a aeheg ad [J wo Ci he: Li Ul ~ J
al l1Aavre wv ~ = TS ~ a ~ AS Ao 5 TN 7] - da J
A ode dN J da LO or A WE! J Po Jl PRISE WR wD 8 a UG LO CuhiNd “J br ee hk
bo
ho YY Tall lO
| SU Rp |) a A
~~ . - v
COT 1MD | emaenntcin
du \J da ili A addin de Lia <
TY a a ©] OTTO = tym ma Wa le wh h Tals ae ® ou - 7 Atom ann NOT oY
J [Paya Lal “licl Ci aa welll Ca be JY Peril Wh S) Wl ID AW ie 19 WF LN Clie CL
» 5 0 " ay - ” -r vy -y po ” -
Wai alsi ia - yO ~ -~r DIT (YRT NTT ™ - DATS | OAT AaTYT AY A
WiCLil1l: 3 LLIC Dlacli. i Cul Y LULL LGC LLC CUlal tluldldiivilal
~ x
WE — — .
r ® 0 § C
PPL, Ceri 1 LOY 9 cd
“/
OTL z CLODET ied OC,
Wie ilu, gE
a oT
PRY
[S -~
»
" -
Ly
-
~
o
no
Fumy =f ~
villi Lou
bite J Ai C2212
ole
Ade D2 ded O A
N * r
\ | {Vi
-~
-
~ pn
»
~
=
Bn
o
la 5 ui J
iL
yw ~
Li
al
PE SO WA
& es tar
: -
.
- |
) J
“7 Dy
Shih
29
[SR
NETS detain J 0 L,
-
by
"
io
Add
Sy 7 TITY
SOLV sch
*
1.7)
1 ( i
he
\.
gy
ANd
-»
de ba
L
1
mm
hb ob
Li
\ “id
en 1
Oo
No
CL se
~ rm
whe
i
- Nee
wii rai llidai ©
3
mM
Ad
ec
W
Lye 4
Ua
"
PX
Is
and 43 mn
de
Court
>
1)
io > Oo
YY YT TT h
A ey
3
)
O
4
Vp]
4
pS |
=
>
J)
v4
Ho
5
:
ree
N,
0
™
r=
f
'3
CJ
}
vid
\
1)
{7
pS
|
)
]
wed)
>),
9)
N
t
J
ot
-
C4
-
J
0 1.3
n
4)
a)
)
1
U4
(0)
o
d
1)
9
[#]
3 od
:
4
5
:
)
=
:
1)
{3
I.
od
"
}
1)
O
3
AN
0
5
gE
a)
.
i ae
0)
iJ
x
1.)
Ud
J
“~~
MAS Clio
q [4
a A NT a |
1
. 2
bg IK ~~ of .
LVilo ao GU Ww LVALQ
14)]
~ TN
AY
Q
i
QUOC ULLIC |
Cl li
“
CU UC a
LO di
A
Fe
I
oh Nh
POP ae
— —
~
AS WP SS Wa SR ET
PAL OV SR,
Ce
["
{
J ~
1)
7)
wy
V Se bh A Nee Nt de
'
z ~
J
~ =~
Ne Ad
Crmabalina
-
av
Lo
Wa ad;
~~ T
M
‘
Q
Y
3
43
0
3
*
|
0
TJ
U4
O
1)
9)
4
)
u
wl
=
ord
od
ae
0]
y
Q)
&)
2
J
>
o
3
C
13
"3
Q)
es
a)
:
v-
3
J
»
ri
=!
O
or
Q
8
1)
J
:
$0)
3
4
3)
Ud
*~
Si
a
To
J
48
p)
Ug
\)
~
1)
J
«J
jos
a
J
oO
AS
|
J
O
1.)
«
of
ud
0
uy
0
13
N
A
w
¢
Q
U4
~
r~1
«J
8)
joo
or
«J
4)
QQ
O
Ud
,
1)
Q
5
5
rd
.
$
0]
Oo
O
O
)
=
]
U.}
1)
0
1)
ord
4
®)
ord
TG
a)
W
=
4
Uy
1
1)
Q)
3
I=
1
a
4,
Io
Q
1
5
@)
~
Q)
oy;
>
1)
a
1)
jo
3
~
Q)
ry
~~
Ta)
Q
(®]
{
1)
“4
Q
bf
J
S
A
a
>
J
od
0,
a
I
0
]
0
0
r—
Oo
No)
"3
Nn
)
uy
3)
Tn
9
WO
3
Q)
Q)
>
oid
1.)
Lg
-
J
=
Q
0
£)
ud
1)
oO
O
[@)
J
nN
)
or
«
or
Q
aN
or
Q
QO
3
9)
«
O
1d
.
or
>
3
i
£3
<3
4
Ea
0
—
0)
rd
J
jo
U4
re
1)
fo!
0
0
C
>
@
a
a
on
Q
J
rd
J
©
O
“
Mm
rAd
"J
i,
QV
=
>
"J
a
0
Uy
a
4
ug
~
o
:
-
a
5
d
o
Wy
0
bY
0
4
a)
0
7s
«3
iw
;
Q
Rr
Q)
{
Q)
O
1)
0)
LF
pi
od
5%
0
a
=
Ta
a)
3)
eS
oe
J
1
0)
L
a
0)
0.
4
<)
)
ved
eg
or
4)
©]
>
8
fo.
£3
ps
\O
0]
ri
1
O
5
d
Ta
J
2
O
0
3
1.)
Q
O
0)
Ir
®]
[o))
0
r—4
«
or
[rq
Gy
Y
=
1)
C3
24]
«J
)
Pry
M
or
a
wn
a)
U4
a.
:
q
Q
1
O
O
p=
i%
=
1.)
a
9)
a
"
Q
*r
A
Lh
Fy
J
Q
U4
uy
O
8
Q)
0,
V)
3
>
3
Q)
ord
“3
13
od
oe
wn
(EH
Q)
1)
a)
QO
Uy
iS)
3
QL
£3
1
0)
2
U4
Q
uy
es
9)
ie)
1)
¢)
x
CQ)
0,
9)
>
eA
O
LJ
ov}
U4
'D
oO
Sm
OO
a)
rl
W)
3
ud
53
1.)
1)
¢)
~
1
13
ri
Ql
0
0
pS
ES
U4
6]
1J
O
J
3
A)
oi
et
a)
wn
Q)
9)
4)
>
0)
3
3
[0]
@
0)
6)
[
Q
O
H
3
’
a
4
5)
dp}
S|
Q
O
fold)
Q
r
y
?
Ol
hE |
>
O
o
=
ed
\)
a
nn
0
0
Sa
3
fo
=
=
fA
od
o
or
ey,
W
0;
0)
O
>
Lr
[e)
ord
0)
o
r
d
Q)
}
J
0
Q
i
3
3
+4
i
-{
«q
CY,
i
4
3
5
{
o
p
-{
!
J)
3
)
L
a
3-3
4
3-J
=
0
sr
a
©]
U4
«
®)
a)
on
Y
Vo
0;
130
a
Ji
>
S
>
LJ)
4
Q
bi)
OO
*
of)
U4
(
J
«3
0
or
0
ry
"OJ
1)
13
0
3
Q
oO
Q
Q
Q
O
Q
i
0)
BF
an
p=
U4
:
U4
Je
0)
ee
hE |
©)
av]
S|
4
a
4
pid
1)
<)
O
)
l
W
O
O
1J
y=
a
oO
QD.
U4
3]
™S
£3
4
3.)
J
i»
UJ
8)
Sa
)
9)
Q
0
J
0
0
N
QQ
a
O
Q
J)
1)
U4
¥
MN
oO
1
QD)
1)
9)
Q)
"
1)
0)
a
Q
U4
m
8
LO
a
Say
0
od
.
3
0
iw
J
3
ol
a
fe
Q)
—
-
&h
(®)
1.)
|
1J
Cl
\O
4)
U4
U4
G
0
0
1)
oc
9)
ord
>
1)
U4
OQ
ol
Q
=3
!
ig
H
Q
op
O
Q)
Ct
(@)
i)
Ie
0
[0
rd
£2)
mM
Te
|
6]
aa!
o
S
O
Q
3
Le
0
oN
J
a
1J
£2
Y
>
rd
J
=
0).
=
oc
O
U4
Ce
0
1.)
a
1
i
J
—
+)
O
0
¢
0)
0
0
0
Q
0
Mn
0
O
[)
Oo
Mn
J
0
3
S|
<Q)
Q
0)
J)
U4
ee
=
Q
1)
Q
xo
ord
ie
or
0d
rd
6)
o
«1
ct
|
-
0
+)
Q
"
U4
2)
Oo
rd
Oo
»
4)
og
“ed
AR]
1d
<3
1)
“13
1d
0
BE
M
J
®)
©
ord
0]
or
O
o
J)
9]
-
M
i
>
1)
1.3
oO
a
a
U4
J
rd
1
rd
=
a
0
Q
1
0
J
>
Q
|
eo)
=
it
=
Q
9)
9)
3)
0]
18
ri
«
i)
«
a)
0
wr
=
oN
®)
3
O
(¥
>
<i
rl
e
n
,
=
H
Q
WU
“id
ad
4
3
$4
0
0)
0
4
og
a
Q
W
Y
=
ar
0
0
0)
3
0.
3
ol
~~
cl
Cu
<Q
Q)
Jo
£3
=
0
a)
3
Q
=
Ia
U4
a
Q
Q
0
1)
0
Q
Q
rd
Q
or
1)
as
8
q
:
a
0)
.
2
0)
2
&
Q
Q
4)
|
0)
0
81
0
pS
MN
AB
a
=
0
8]
4)
0}
Q
ri
AS)
Q
£
od
£3
a
00
§
QQ
MN
QO
Q
8)
a
spre)
Q
m
ri
4
3.)
Q
ri
a)
O
a
5
fol)
u
tol)
0
0)
2
M
3
0)
0)
or
i)
ri
>
r
io
Q
ri
O
4
0]
or
3
DY,
Q
U4
7
a
Q)
4
OQ
(©)
Q
[Gy]
Q
Q
‘
iS)
R=
CG
T
Q
rd
AQ
a
w
| ¥
Q
0
4
0
1)
=z
3
0
Q
5
jo
a
Q
Q
rd
Ke
T
)
8
Q
Q
el
ri
Q
od
1)
1)
0
0
Q
«3
a
0
3
J
ori
0)
4
4]
(0)
2
£2
iJ
O
J
=
1
ct
oe]
8
Hy
Q)
®)
A
<<
a
=<
H
ba
f4
o
nN
a
ur
<i
1»
,
~
ow!
>
Q
or
o
Q
0)
QJ
b
a
8
>
~
14
0]
®)
Q
13)
0)
ood
~
ed
4
U4
3
«
-
J
se
rd
O
!
a,
0
Oo
od
&
0
1
®]
O
x
Q)
0)
g
Q
=
iJ
4
a
>
=
®
)
ol
Q)
=
.
Q)
uy
.
1)
1)
ord
1)
0.
Ci
Q)
Q
.
jo
Q
+)
Oo
O
™
Q
>
x
<
Q
J
Ta
"od
1
Cy
vd
5
0)
4
0
H
>
3
©
0
1
0)
”
«
[=
J
Q
od
=
)
i)
3
nN
4
Q
ri
CY,
Vm
4
ied
1)
3
.
a3
Qo.
i)
=
1)
'
|
Q.
43
(0)
+
Q
=
J)
>
<3
0
Q
0
Q
Q
a
Se
.
OQ
oN
Q
TJ
en
M
Q
>
e
J
o0
a
rd
a
~~
1)
eA
0
Q)
3
ha
6
x
(©)
1)
~
S|
J
QQ
<i}
3
0)!
.
®)
13
Q
0
3
a
o
O
J
13
a)
1
0)
or
O
4
13
0
~
id
O
>N
wd
co
1)
—
.
Q
J
Q
TJ
io)
Q
1)
Q
tq
Q
oid
c
3
O
da
a.
O
1
i
oC
0
1)
eo
[>
3
®
3
ty
Oo
Q
7)
A)
Q
AG
)
2
ON
gi
O
i
13
4]
43
n
[4]
3
(6)
Q)
1)
oO
£4
3
0
[))
CD
Q
(#)!
0
oy
A
O
u-4
I] M [] [3
v v »
» J .
: r « . |
|
TTL he ° Dyay oy . -
~ Y.7 = PE . 2 arr
, <7 Sg V de Sr hd dead nh - | 4 ~~ LAA
- pe pe - . _ 7 of ER
~~ - ~YN ON Cr Pn rs Py =r GA rE -
wiv diaUWV LD LVM ao Va CG Vin dihbCl ede LY Udo AVS
i of
- . pu ge vy pe o in -
. “~ — NYY OS ~ * - Ta ey - y ~ = rt Nv 7 Ye de Ta my aria 3 . —n - o Pt
Ne he Nie Neil Pip WAL SE LW 5 — halo oo Cl he da V Se Choe de de WAN LAS So A A als WAL ae bbe Ld Cha Sr hf Ae uD ee
.
- = ~
[Sa CAA LS —
’ - wy ly v ay - : - em PS Ne 1 xy - nm do Tm ~ ~~ vy
, UN una Ws SR.” pr iil he AAS. Ld C4 de
I
PE a a n by ~ - don ln mm yy y
Ne J we Ch Fh dA den Dr CL ha Cr Me Sr AANA CL ALN Nr
7 Lo -~ ’
> - - o aX * 2. ¥ oa om Tom li al a ER = ~ =
vi he mal Lal WA LWUWULaWQ AL VL
~ =~ 0 adn 0 A ee Van To a Nt a Poo I ml
Sa ~~ VA Nem iid Ea dub dd\S a? Ae oo bsidi 2 he St oe Se
. L ee 2 : - dis ~ ; 1 5 “ . CEN ET oxy ov Ans tS em yy - ~ ~ A Oo Aw Al yen, RTE Fg Bi 0
VW wn and a eV Gide We Lede Lali Ul US oC a ad fo RSL WE apa AL Wha dole Ad
| JE A TRL EN i Diam mm pn ee oF amy mm] {GIs Phe GEE
. bod AANA VY J am NI No See hp in he & WJ ode NN al JL he Cad hh da NSA og
~
@
. iy - - 3 x : n £5 ny i - = Ae ba mp ye Be gla Ee ea a To
. whi DUO WL 3 4 lilugad Lids dy ae SUL OL :
. NEAR ~ ™ " ‘ - fm , - - Toe mm ony nS ON —~ Rl ~ dm ~~
et Ce Madd Ald be 4 A, CAME AACH wo Lal se he da Cd bby Ale al de aily VW AA 40 bob
- he ~ - ‘ ~ 4 ~ ry - ~ =n - 4 - 7 Py Te wT wm ow god TOO ~~ fe
[RW aA a NJ ~~ ~ a el on | VIF Spa, Sl Wi hla LDECLLOVILLE, Se Shane Adi dL Law? Se , 8
pv + ~ - , - : “a Te
- ~ Pon ~ f= - ~ - ~~ A ma fom Tm - a AAAS d= emo CN em,
deve SLL WA s bom oy h—ad LUJAN Ne Walid WLLL vide GQUU LGA UVULIG AL we ivo
~ > - -y ~ r~ --
~ ry ne i - sz ~ wy, i pn gy wh py gm] - , Sox fon em Land omy om <7
at Ne hg we La te Gr gall al AS de
NS - - N - - ah y ~~ whe - " iy ~y yo FS va ~ he 3 yoy
RL fr 4 ee in - ta — hl 2, Ad de dd BIW FAYE > [OO wiih UL a | RE
< «
nt ema NS dd, 3
-— - -" -
~ —~ - REN a. A Sn at up , . - IR JN oe fo
a WS oa Nan ~ J Ree Cohn ol Y WPL — ad — Camda od IR IN I de
o a“
a ae = on A HEY Yo 7 IDET RE - . ~ ~
(WR WHSees Ca va 9 [SRP LNA C - i ’ | WH wr wR PY a § wl Wt we \/ | SS Ww ad
’ \ - ~ wily ¥ ; vi — RL i a * Ay J A vy
\ J -— NJ ~ - “ whe Oa LR ES A Ahh Wad ao ia hich oO
\ “
Age RY A : oT ra ames % Ter rn oa ly Ro FL na wo 2
fF LL ES hen ie dn | a — - le be oe Ne [SPE wer oa We Ji TR BH 1 ood J - de \— 9
Pp . ry ’ ' "
AL ~~ ‘ bad Rr To Wan Be Td La Fo "
\ -— \/ de be be ar he Sr Lr Sa IRN SL Wa WY § we NA Se oO
\
CA a - rr AL AANA a CL Se ee Nl
n y a . . - 7 ¥ . - - ° - ~
7 wy - —- CVO CE ve eS ty vr AN ~ 5 rY - v t =~ SO
— FR (= Ade Lido dl Ow lilila Lill Wad ahead J ALCal dbifv LUN oO
o dal .
Pw RS OY Sa ~~ ~ ~~ ) x7 “ye ga - a myn Gm Am AN OYA OY
dmb Nr CL Ch Pa DR = GPS, NS oR OSD EDLY WL wl Gt “vy CLC Aad du \J de (SL wipe SY BE wl Iw
fyi
_o - - uf wm ’ - NE TPR. ge -, ay gy oo TL eta l= amon 5 PE Pt J - ~ - yi, ~
| Te mel SRE IN ed Ee ee” ry Pe 0 I we a 0 ou J BR BF oo CAGCS LLG Liil Ciaal PRAY FNS YEA SR US SR WP I LE aki Joa
i - To - Fahy ara i 2 Jn LS CT PS 7 EN 7 we ms SE Sa ,
br LAC Ne — he A SOR SN OL WOT SDL NE Sa Ch £7 den Sor Sw — \/ ne aniiiSe dd ~ \J oD Ne A AIT 2a bo he NaS Lem baliha Ly
- > ~C1 Ea ¢ ~ - & po) 0 BroconsT ohhal
Co bo mr hr aaNi Ne Arh Mrnin nd ber de WD <a - A A dm St 0d Nr MA as Se - i
J Is ot
. . ~ " ~~~ dm Nn ny ee ~ fa A rm en mm le ~ ~
= ol ~~ (Pp § Loa GC ii a | © aid ALU A de oy Br WY -—
A
, - . . x "
7 - - ~ Lo i Tm mr A AW TTY AT LN “ - Weel a ro relavlaTe
— — Ch Ne nd ae WD J JA, hd de Sr LAVAL ALAA CAL pF OW wr a bo Cah ad AAU AL oe
o
-
-e \ oe.
»
O
y
1)
13
-
jo
y
1)
QO
*r
{
oy
4
p3
N
ord
a
or
8)
1)
0)
1)
o:
4
1)
wn
1)
3
.
0
or
0)
sed
U4
Q
:
ord
3)
RE
0)!
«
0
Q
1)
=
ws
(7)!
1)
=
J
ri
a
Q
«a
:
=
Q
O
0)
af
O
Q
=
3
33
wi
0
©)
"0
=
Oo?
£9)
3)
QQ
JJ
Q
©
Q
@
He)
rs)
O
Q
A
-
3
<
J
Q
~
|
v1
W
od
3
U4
QQ
=
J
4)
1)
j&
0
33
-:
0)
1
0
ri
vd
9)
Q
A
3
od
0
=
Q
1)
13
1)
0
4)!
od
Q)
>
fa
Wd
i
lol}
Q)
J
0.
| 8]
i
0
Q
:
|
0
=
0)
6]
®)
U
eg
1.)
4
O
#
6
>
a
rd
Q
ci
a)
od
r=
il |
U4
3
W
0
U4
O
1)
Y
Q
Q
JJ
J
£3
[®
ug
@
6]
ord
Ud
Q
.
pe
Lon
O
0
a
Oo
od
a)
or
ie
M
=
0
CS
7p
.
a
n
g
a?
ty
or
oid
I
J
3
a
0
Ry
vi
QO
O
™
wn
Q)
:
i
1)
<Q)
1}
Cl
x
3
Q
33
-
U
4
Q
QQ
1
)
1
>
(J
Xe
fol}
U4
3
60
od
3
3
xt
0
Q
ES
0
or
<Q)
’
Q
|
Q
ord
or
13
«J
«
>
3
0)
13
od
j=
Q
Q
+)
=
U4
(x
lo
Q)
or
od
4)
Q
U4
AQ)
1)
£3
1
1)
~
a
a
Q
O
0
a
8]
Q
~3
0
0
jo
0
'--:t
o£
ood
1)
ec
KS)
J
=
0
[8]
uy
O
wn
oO
=
0
0
Td
3
od
0
«
«0
®
$4
0,
5
«
33
pS
Q
~
N
®
~
~
0
“
)
"
@)
1)
0)
Ho)
u4
Q
ri
2
2)
&=
Bi
53
a
8]
*
q
Q
1»
1J
Fr
o
a
F
Q
oO
1.3
0
"
Sy]
“wd
O
0)
1
1)
3)
ol
1)
-
we
0.
©]
or
6]
+J
Q
c
x
'd)
0)
0)
=
d
4-3
L
,
«
Le
oo
7%
rd
ri
TC
4
o
r
1)
_
n
Q)
(aN
=
Q
3 .
.
LJ »
a]
A » » .
al N 4 .
Fue iy
Cia A A sodd
CAV TOT Ye es
[SAW A WD IEEE ee
* LTAYD bh Vedi [1p
LEE, bad 3l4sY
[
AENINw 2 TINE und md are RAWAL QHRULG DIVviaion
ty
1 4 3 fae {ms bi ~>7y "14
¥ A % R SAY ~ :
Vie
Civil FL th a 3 ind . &U 4
cc
? ry Qin apse or A TBRIC 7 a 3 wR Ea - Sasa 55 “hg
Tre * ny OQ
AD 5 Leh Hdd
TRIAD 9
Sal daa HEI -—d V ate
STE pT OF BAD
ow ‘hb Fat asa vd
wa
VS. Civ
WIAD OD " MTT OY Lata WE a ~ SALLIE ALIN COUNT X SCI IXNOL FS WD, doo Se ALS
© THAW IY
UdiZ &
’ QINAMPN “tT SETITRY A
0D wd OF R CA a de hd or & a § A le
LAL . i : Jacsson Division
wv po
: 7 wy ’S. Civil Action
rn TN
¢ ¢ i pi
. TEE ET FAT TITERS MART v < Er En, vf . - id 3 } } ; )) HY 3 0n v¥ PEL BAT We & de A end nd Wild A A wi «iad Clad Lan) 2D
Qi rEmAyY DY ZV RN T rn YF ATO oi. Ud AOC hd hat i ? 4d wn Abad oD
yTA RRATID TF
Cr AMER. i Ch a
Y “ro ~nd NBN Western Division
Q
ft mgd Mog dhs PR “ - Va,
Civil EA clon ANY o 1120
CIENT B HUMIC TDAY STWADRRMD ‘ ME are Adhd ibn A CL TAI DEE Fg Wall WWF
¥
DISTRICT .,
af dn 403 a Wd
rarer myn RTH ONY
) J) 3 - %n ” 2
Hattiesburg Divizcion
. 431 Suri } 4 vr “21970 V3. ivil Action bold o 2178
I 4 » Ty +3 TVD Rey SAW J sg 7% TN NT -« aT UL hid ; if Wg ba po Ty MARIOH COUNTY O0L DISTRICT, Ek it a SAAN
WPT Pom ©
UNITZD MERICA Fill. -n Np
4 do» ;
& dic Fl Dhykaten
FY ITNT B2T
‘
C 3 B STP MPI TP QINTENNTY TNE CIFOR OR py hY Q = did de Nora Ld [8 ‘
ad + Li TAN LA Td i LAR dS aed hill ld, oe LRP
TT veh NT ONY FST ¥ 4 SCIOX ye Oram € Th of - bbe FUWal?d wid NUVI a & OUI Le FO NE BF Po wd, ah dada
pe An ot rry hl
x
—
r
t
le
S
—
~
~
~
(&
“
t
t
. . ”
3
» -
a
L]
VET £9 TR n ITI YT Fathi 'ES™
do i dot Wd F fay $hliied dep FACIL RPP
Src
vee
ONT vy PNG RT ares | RNY TP FRAT LEN? PR SITY
OVW LE Tada LWJuia d COL ULL AE Si
or Po Sl in od a ak nro
[oh RL SRSA LW LA 8 15 N pg a 0 o Bam]
$I REA Y
ed add don | 98 60d did Wt ni
ers
Vee
§
hak 8 | EN Tat
EDUCAY 10 LL, WP SOY
oe Le Tat Rr
Soars REED) Va y LB Pps |
y e332
5 eTD, ¥
Bd wd
vo aloud du Sud
DR a Rin
1,48
J
g ™
td dln Bs dn @ dad
wy Ed £YY
Tl ate ad ed
var oa
\ RS Bel AN Sp Ads
hou | LO a
Foliar g
PT ab a at in
id Wo wii d 4
oe PE ht
7 %
wa
Nd Dun
TEN WY RYT OY wen RY O
died wr Nerd BS “liad yp aad Adelina
RA LY OQ
Sede = I}
4 £ Bat tes
Le Et
&D a wr we
NP PTL? R27 TOP hq “a \ Y CY TST
. 1 5
PS A § 4.4 Pi A 3% 6d dd & EAL
Fe 1 i'd nals Fl
VP RY
i 9 ds ole Wad g
-p gn gun gy -y
| *) SN » wid
wv
Lg dnd 44 teas oa hn BBN
® PE r §E TY CHT RFR TY 7 wr Bary oR
t 3 4 [SOS 8 3 yy $d gd PE §
Wf ddl Ko SABE BD FN PERSIE Ore)
> 9
Va og
:
a
LNT SET TD yw, 4a RTS
p
{ No 00 Fa
. be *
REA EE Mo Bari gl or BG WSR Ade |
- hPa ™ 2 a A aT
GACARLOUT i "
~~ 2 p:) $e & E xv Fa bal !
CAV $1 Yh {
py 2 — ww wd om
MY ARY MN LE $4 « y 5S
be Ad Cicd ad po 2 vigion
o
m
3)
ant py wma TE CP a & ve
aaCern LDAViA8iln
= Ad ¥ 1 1 {TJ
Aretion Ho. 44UB
Ci 21
.
we
A ~~ Lag | ay, Fan
hes aim of 83
2)
Vv
To on Ban pom 2d gerd od mw vy % 4 i A a Division
x Lo Fo oe J a :
cL 20 - wd NP (E
a
- NARS NO Wag urn en gy
L Fa OF RL WJ Wo by 70h" 1.53 6 lle New
~e NTY
D2 ard
Fd
L S25 nT 3 ROE { =
V od o LAS - \
SS anl eb diate la £3 gm TT ae Cena
ESA edd Asse COL Lai d & ree LAN S2 ¥
oy Ty OS AM YT OA
y & ANiLANL Wd
TR eg en vray ™4 wet 4 ~N
LiCiled ici 22 dda Vv Aw AVR
-y < - ew ’
VS
{ eps 1 HO h | 3Y2 3 WV)
¥ =» oe V - Fe . wot 7 &e ia
Av AF TITY TD US Pa Vat hat ass Crem mY ™P CO rary nT
SVS LDES aie we fe boted od Ld i hee td M0 de IE id ® ed Fides)
v ) me QEAMINIIOY ANT ABITITY ON
LYRIS YW ww hibd aw Vi Et Li ANA “s
Ire vr Tn ™NEerd = n
et CAA Sr AS AAV a 53.02 4
a TINIE CNT AY
231i} CN \ 1 D
SI FY RS [AES WL VAN |
RENE ATS CMA TOY
Wi A bed A asa Land
fart 4 En nite d vy Lele) Yvy } ~ 5 TS Dn . $ 7 2
*
dX v ne Ne vAaUad Le. I Te FA iv)
ores YOY TRIN 0”
bet Ned ASR GLEN 2 oe Ka, IJ ANS TUS ht
~~ T TARTS
re EE I hE Cre
gov, ny bin fp be. oF on Bi,
RA aluis BA Si Pe WEY FPS J Us & hl ddd de here b
o x Pyt y wn ee nd Va 4 Ary
et JO BN UF RES A SEX
» va)
ov ewe »0 2199 (1)
“oe N WLLL ln 49d o A a J ai)
COL RT Ld al REE rea a bank Tala Bw. a Yat | rey rT
dd Wiad bb SILLA EIN Whe Sol dd p het & HK aiind
Boog TYTN NT
4 WIIPTE EOF. 1
. Po or nem THR ©
VADKXBON LVAY
. 2 fl | dr 4 re hd - nn 3 y
\d : Iii ATR kD, J i
BRRIYID ATTY CNT ww
LD}
Sid hid CUAL 4 he LNAI La DI
£3 LNT RAITT OON : ) S|
/ py : ” 3 1, bg N f A
WF al ade oo Seiad’ DO ap op Nr ap aes | We or A ie? bd Awd’ ®
\ $4
23 {
oe Lay LPS
Eel et Bl aT at tah si nt AE A a ATT 1 ER TT PIT oy aT Oo
LUVALDIGaWl VUGaL 4 ne ee USNS ind DIE RRIOT bt dn add ud
-
- 4
~
WI
Lid, & AS lode Sob
J
ENT NT
dig "BX
bord Nor Gin at ind
oud & ta
oi om eR RPO
ih he oo 9 “st do és add
“ ~ . g ya % v
{ - afl Yi € 1 ’ FN FX
Ph RE J iy 8 Jiiebn bd W/W bd 4 FRA PAW
AEE ToL KAJ Roh
ob dy a nd
vd LW
Tyee
¥ «J *
FTA Nw -
| £¥, Re ISIN DD
VV dh dead asada WA
yore ry Po & Fata Fy
bis LBs A LS
dy ew dh aA vs
«<n
& Od dein A rly Sw
» 42 me was
dy wie
~ B
3 i
1 3 &
LJ
LJ
-
.
OI}
a
~ b | F al - yy fade
vo AQ \ ‘4
ryivet al sev fi} 1 ®
dw VAD LL
dcr -$ ” *1 \ 0) 0.7) . 2% 1 fn PS 7 ? - i
So de V us de ACLA0ON 58 oe L6G Vi)
ITY AR “rm oO a
a I A Fa Rit { % 3 -
Shik rd da Se A aC g éiienS
-
wpe ay
oe
EE EY
° . ' <3 a .v 3 ~ 11 Action No. 1160
a hh. LlOon . dud % J
o, ~ YL WE NN Tv “© ow IY ’
i 3 F Oo !
od Bo bd So ads Ne Lg od dn & hdd
— ED BITS
IY ww Ce VY dN S- be Cada SO Vis Wid ra 418
wil
2 ’ — "
er on dz 8 A va Qa . wo d vim yy vd vat
a Sor oh 4 a A a d,s 9 in dn du be SE . hig 34 NAS
oe rte ene ih ee ps
~ "d Fo 1 3 * | % 2 mE Tole I 4 gi : PE -. Fhe a el Pata - 5 = -~ Eon h EW ate -— Leh & ~~ Pe ™ Fre « I's y
| SR a [Wie WO RW A I | { AS worl, 9 Ca Al ed 5% La Ulid LiNAd oe LUD rd 4 NS Sd od a ws A Jad
mr aa rr ————e————————— 4 ¢
or . » - ~
- NE eh 4 ~~ EE LT TE
Cadald oa eas dr bbe hf wd Se A Se Adan So “ea
“ < oy on
Lew
-
3 Ld
> SP -
rl IE Vat x . -
Chae dC UG wd Weis | %
Pla Re ans
Sor Nid swan
~ L n a i:% Fy J (Ea. SE do br § wo dn
whe ade, Soh eh be ee Gr
wl EE CL Pea
het Bd LP eo dh Sr ded A a
a
IY Ee
Wi ek fr wed Wr a SS RG
-
Nr Wor Com one & &
~ wy - T~, ay WN gw F rE ON VY IN . 5 : }
NAS dd Sw Na hf 0 an a ae wr Ee Nd L*
g - % 8 a - = %
< mw ¥.} PAE AEE oh a al Et CAH en :
ln cr « Ld dow ow Nd de £3 Gin Wo Sn Ge at Vie dria bor 84 Se
PE TRE. (eT Oot un a <7 we Pu fom T°
Cdvd wad. Ven oe No Jo soe br Nd Nr a a La NM
a = > Poe my 2
din eo
TnL Y "> N i %")
ent Wats Fd
43 ER, BA HL TCR SE
fo ve St “eB oh NS dl (PETAv EY" i &
bd L v
? id Ned LI PW ~
N
"Py ea - -— yo
L & ork Nad S$ wha i i 3 hs
-
FFA :
@® ded
Se 4 na
ory diss Se
Wa on va 3 Em
rd ln hur Net SA whe Ser
o » “
hak Wo be 4 Hm -,
ah ee WW - an AE Rd
wy Np , . on . y nt $
ta - ear — A + ING
os, oo
a NA
de Sm my we
Sons & No a=
“ «
od abe oie 20s
v 2 "
¢, 7% 4 ~~ gn Pe BN
VV de Wot Ww bw fo & Sm
. €
-
i
v
.
v y ’ < ns 5
te 2% J nt ¥ « ' =" : “ . Ty ry 4” —oy ow ry y §» 3
oer Gd dad a 4 5h VI Ja ade wim V ad che Nn h bg me Sw & ae F Se 0 2 Gad
» »
3 . x a » .
~ vy. - + ~~
§ os) ~~ CP Cm gd ey me yey } NC
CA wi Swed atad Be Je Aa er LA
| ES LW pi L Su oa & A . a |
«
1 J A rom A ~ hs - - ad - » » v
¢
D
A . TP VO “po So 4 . - ra v, phen #2 - : J . -
- |
FREL JL WISE
LA ’ » % whe PA I
9 N s pe 1 A 3 " -y -
74 SOE BR 3 -, ay dhe oo 0 £ som CE ae de TaTs eo» & a
wt Vi oo med hoe 68 a vy 4% oy wd Swe vie be Seg oh + dN Wa NA a - we ANS NA a Ned a --
- - -
.
Pp 4 ve 5 wh ; be . ~~ vy — TN SY \ 2 wy we yy }
J. i -b Pe ode Waa
- ob Lo ISTE St ed dn
-~
$a
. . PE I N . “
-~ p 4 F ey Oo Pars e.r 4 . 8 on $= b. > - y
b ga pr R fat Ty | 1 1H 3 ; {
fe ad WF ee . 053 Vd ah A 8 Wo Ae de Os Rp BC ed - Aa CLV
2% - . - -
Ee Bu gm uy A es Er? ¥ HE Ahoy ne
Lod ober {a Ne Ch A wo
wh de Se ho fo
§ a ’ er ve 4 UX -
CP oF dn Lf Ae
3 h
£3 Sad
- Fa © tex,
Woe Yel a
1%
Yi 3 * de
v .
wd
TE aa
in
’ Be
> ye
- we
v9 7 4 Vig
yp ————A
{ oy Be en uw ~, 4 - wh
ws br wr ed 7 ds i . wa
RB ——— he
-
El
or
.
~f -
w we “% ~
LA
EO Voet A ws 0-8
° - v po
nes %,
< yawn SF - 3 ~ ge 2 ~ & a” mad " — nel
LY YeYS - Car + | ¢ 3 LST 7 ™ Ss. NP a
ad Ne fA ed de Sor Aes ahs Po » Em ab wg? se FEE Yrs Se - bei
” Y . +] wn ~
sem 2 BW TN TN PNY wv srt :
A 43 { Aad AVE FTE SA . ~
ER .
vs oh ~- pitad Ne J
bd - Fa -
7% US : .
~ x % . ¥en 3 ~~ ™ AY ~
LAP a WL -_ be er
ha ¥ Se a er WA L Ws SE Sd
’ PO ”~ rr 9 9% - 3 y =
yw 3 EE Tals & by nvm oy rt, Cw 3-3 1 > ele Fs BiB
“on WAR A Yeo a at | PY Sa Sp i Ca har eo” BA AP Fe
ES
.
A | ~ rye. We Wt vp B bh ¥ ¢ - Ter im
- | oN on Pe. - Pe a Sr on, s 2 yr ve a Be maT ICIS 5
dit do Grdeda Ua 2 + Ne NODAL ALU ives asi FS
&
o
>
"
: ‘ - ~ Je a Da | dine pon -— 1 i - Ae ~
a SA MEL In 9 Co avianen/id J [Sa Lo Wo. Te, °
-
: ” Ly
> \ . p; he 3 1}
Siia v4 > - § Rd ®
|
-— - - 7
; 7, VARY, "Neu
Fd , o ’ § - : . p
AI A Ht Sr FAC
ANA Nr —
¥ i i rad on fe opm od
TR bt dw wn? Nerd Se
“
sre A——
ye
“a A I]
pe
&
“
hn C. O Cll
~ ~ —
- LS
r 1 gq
0 - 1
7h W eld
fu SR wep SR OF 8
4 ~ Q
whee
Ldqucation, OIL
le
—
T Save
MOLIUL LLL
En Wm
EN
vu -
Ea
he U
JJ)
11M
SH43 du AT AN
de ALL 4
a ~
4 AL
x
P
=
Ala “A
,
Nw]
vn] 3 wr
eddie de ULL Lily
ara
Chelraco, ed
0.
QX
my
ue Ch LALU LL
(ZA vm
Dernore
( £
C SL
¥ ’
> .
-
r
: 5 an . i - gy pr ’ . rm - pr - - a — —
«
|
| LJ]
i
- — - - - ae” | andi - - — - hk y _._ —i pa A pa — te V = - al wa — we - fa | onde ii
LOAUCALION Lilli. L AU V
Or WILE LOQUCRLIUITY LLUWWLUI.
n ~ *
TE A _ICOO ) AMUSO U UU FL
ad JA A JAINA AA \ 0
AsiL XL Ad O \ LLL adh LUE yO
LDU A LRN S DUN IS | FLAN 1d AN
DRY Crone o. YTUIRCT VV
Ai nA TRS
EEE ~~ NIL " > \ ‘ y 14 OD
aA Vailaisik Lu J1 UV IU hb] 11] @ DealldlIC,
i IY > ‘
tent DY A. LJ. LTOULCHY iJ
{ LL ME BY VY niGHA1UL UNBER
i LUCIE LAY Sault Vv
\ ClIiENG, CY CULTURALLY l/Bianivivy)
/ >} / TON { 7 1 errYy DOILOIL §& id : /
EERSONAL JP AINIQON
AaNiJ/ XA ha i bo lf 09 00 .
A Adi AUJAN DOUUMD LLL Aad IJ
AI - All WEURL
4 4 )(F 24 Nd Yr 1(r} 5) 0
(WATE EA ; RH UTE J i iL DUE
SQLuaents, SUliicr LJuouu, cul vol
'
8 ili york y J
XX \
¥ Al J 11 LADEN i oy SALA
4 clhidl y O \V 111iK 111 O ) Clili lil | Way ARAL Ad Wil «ad Laid ala UIT HILAL tii)
3
- OCD. 3 -& iL V LIU cli \ J Ji UV IUK cl JUL LEWD LAR 4a LUI CLAN i ARRAN
drip
i
i
\
3 } Q Fa “sa a lo} xX YX 7 }
CLAN CLAN i [9 i ACAM LY LC i . IN) \ yAlaCli ld Cada IAS | Ly’ i VV aly L771 |B BAN
tildt ULLICLY WUiaddotil« Olil iii I lm 32 IX Udell RICHY | 1108 Gil
1111 C1101 ) LLL (Cli iit 1142. © 4 2150 \1'¢C CO1IVIIIICCOU lilal all ull JoiJid
. \ } } or Te y , ( . ar ava TID IC 1 YYYy 3 \
D\ JNJ i i yy XX OS | i Lil Ji A ALAN A L LAN CillAaiiai wii Cli TEA Lik Cli ik Li AAJLAA Li
\ ) 11 { SO ) HLS THOTLEH ‘ / HICH ¢ OH 1CU
/ I
C { ng / naa l illic SUL YL ALON 1A J1 UV IUN CitliCli rad cl LX Rola) Cal id 11111C 120 WA QA: CIITA
A FL etlJid JA Fetal iI ( [JO HoEL bedd Lcilils 111LC LICL LU Al 111K LU LiiCil Clill 11.
i { Cuil il
N \ - Yat N Y YO x \ \ Q 31 Q
;
ORNL WNS Jil iL clLK ct WWidi UdiCTliiilict,. aaa A; i CC llial taal LJuLii OL LIUWED
\ Jil . J 1c LR | ‘l vel iv
- : }: | EN yg. : a IA
] PHILS L UK { hs i J alCU WILLIK oCl1ililil t11C11 OWI1 CLhHIIIAUTCIL LO SUVA Vc dd AAD
oU HCTTLCT Ho { LOLCLT vu. . . _ 1
p \ N NE C 2% ad \ Oo ( -¥ COTTE 14 NaTarl2n | Pal | { Valo ™
" " r PO \ DQ JIIUC PC ILIIUCLIL SL1iVUULY LLicil LAAT LACK LAC LULU DCO LLC iaaliUll, SOC Lcd cllilA CLV
3 A i ¥ / ry - 5 Vall > . CIC 1117) 1 y Ly A nye
{ ) \ VY CU ¥ Or \ [UU L SLUTS EAN LW WCCIL dd 1aliliaim Lian U Aili 1331) SHLUIRAC ALD FACHIE ORK
. AK ’ - al AT ’ \ ’
A
JIN
f R J Po 1 1 [ LJ
ALANS JWG JAN \ he J tp ~ 7)
TITRA D a de i J . a ; .
DUNGLAN VLLOCUOLL WaiLil W o
fo
Ct
wi LIVU LL
~~
wD LLIVOU Lo
1 OR
Lisa LA ah
f= mn >
he de WLLL a
vi ey | ~ ATTY OT ~ ey rr ; - A, mi, OR
a C3 A. OC VLU LL CL fe 5 4C V a fo? V Will. 4d
Le WALLA an Bn lh Te
hs dn A Son Not
S
(SN I w= oA SS § Lp 1 Of = | 3
ho Wa
we vn TL TON. Ep. oF Sw Sy wp
0 0 LiCLiand Ne La o
ry“ MT bd
ENS WAIN AL V
Pa OY i
LIV VO
I C Al
0 LLadN
A NT
3 Siete ~
hab WAS
~
Nee WALLA
eo ad & B=
onli SRR NY ut i ~
oI
Nt "MOT
Nd tn SL a A
be Sr LAA Wid A.
po ~~
nm » NEAR agalel oll Ji
Ld V PY LACH AAD dp oe \J
/
-—tV
LJ
TY 5 1 ~) IIMS mi = NO
Noe A AGLLAAS- do bor hehe 4 2° A ALLA AS Se No de |S) §
C
NT TIMI TOS AT S71 Demat omy
EY tt EF | © J LB he i: gt = oA afew Be 3 WII
17+ - XTi way "My °
Vil LV EC Lw — \J Ps
4 Lol J SL
oO
= Ld =
LW LULA
lA vt me
aoc LSI SO. Sp SF §
FA FAY
CTO 19 - - Lom ~ ~ Pll
WW rbd de LA | OS | WI § wr [a 4 LS i | S99 §
fs ¢ Val re ~~
a SN CANA ANA ANS
Tamer XT
DLOWIL V ©
- ° » " ° Ll A
a Te re - A TTT BE ull yO
Nor LCL RAL BS EL Noe J ALACASN AA VV he Sel 2 “el a
- ~~ Ty -
LMC LW LULL Wood, Wid
A= J wel 5 3
-3 T°} -
ALLAN MA Wola Al
Yoh uhalataTel TI" T) TT
HNIC LLODO LL LLall » 9 (STARR 0
2 LL LA 4 Se
a a foe oop
JU A LALA LL WY
o
~ yy Png
0 UL GA ae
CA eS
0G REN Fe ~ Loe oF mm of : - La 0 4 “om
2 1
-
ht oe kA
pn be A w= LLL
pF { Ae bed hg Cond No Ne
719% 1 SO PP oy ~~ . ) ey fy -e7 ® ~ i. SEU -
AN Se i ad A wed \ oe Cs Gm Ll . \ . a — YY © i § -
7’ —————— A ———— a mh a. seri
~~
ured | ! | — —~
- an ~~ i
—-— CAS } | = W 3
CA LANA
WLLL Whe le J
Pr A a ee Te ee & EA =t = E ®
QDOCELVALLUIIO 6