Letter from Lani Guinier to Janet Wong RE: voter registration
Correspondence
March 20, 1984

2 pages
Cite this item
-
Case Files, Thornburg v. Gingles Working Files - Williams. Affidavit of Alex K. Brock, 1981. b31ad32c-da92-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/2b7bbc96-0194-4369-902b-d538dd6d304c/affidavit-of-alex-k-brock. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
I \\ ( IN THE UNITED\ STATES DISTRTCT COURT F'OR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTTI CAROLINA:. RALTGH1 DlvrsroN , ,tr. ! CTVIL ACTION NO. 81-80,3:CIV-5 RALPH GINGLES, et aI. ) )plaintiffs, ) v. RUFUS EDMISTEN, et a1. Defendants. AIex K. Brock, being duly s\{orn, hereby deposes and says: 1. I, Alex K. Brockr drTl Secretary-Director of the State Board of Elections of North Carolina, the offices of whLch are located at Suite 801, Raleigh Buildinq, 5 hTest Hargett Street, Raleigh, North Carolina 27601i 2. I have served in that capacity continuously since August 5, 1965, and was, therefore, servinq in that capacity in 1967 when the General Assernbly of North Carolina ratified Chapter 640, Session Laws of Lg67, which contained proposals for two amendments to the constitution of North carolina; 3. Those two proposals were approved by vote of the people in November of 1968 and became Article II, &4 (3) (presently Article II, S3(3)) and Article fI, 56(3) (presently Article II 55(3) ) of the Constitution of l.Iorth Carolina; 4. Article fI, 53(3) provides, inter a1ia, that the General Assembly of North CaroLina is prohibited from dividing counties in forming the state senate electoral clistricts; Articre rr, s5(3) provides, inte_r alla, that the General Assembry is prohibited from dividing counties l-n forming State Representative electoral dlstricts; 5. As best f reca1I, I did not deem these amendments to the State Constitution to be subject to the submission requirements of 55 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, ert the time of their adoptlon, and, therefore, r did not submit the amendments to the Attorney General of the United States for approval or seek their approval by the United States District Court for the District of Col-umbia; !'i tti t \, AFFIDAVIT -2- 5. I have, however, now advl-sed the Attorney General of the 1968 Constitutional amendments, by way of correspondence on the dates of September 22, 23, 24 and 28, 1981; 7. A copy of all of my correspondrence to the Attorney General, regarding in part the 1968 amendments Ls attached hereto, along with pertinent attachments to the correspondence, excludj-ng coples of session 1aws, the correspondence and attach- ments being incorporated herein by reference: 8. I have subnLtted all information to the .Attorney General which I deern to be of any irnportance or siqnificance to a deternnina- tion by him as to whether the amendments satisfy the requirements of 55 of the \zoting Rights Act of 1965 and have requested that the determination be made as expedltiously as possible; 9. I have also submitted to the Attorney General, for his approval, copies of Chapter 8OO, Chapter 82L, and Chapter 87, Session Laws of 1981, these constituting, respectively, North Carolina's apportj-onment plans for the state House and Senate, and state Congresslonal electoral districts: 10. I have subrnitted all other information deemed by rne to be pertinent to the apportionment plans, includinq all supplemental information requested by the Attorney General. CI-*H &r,"*L AIex K. Brock Secretary-Director North Carolina State Board of Elections AFFTANT Sworn to and subscribed before me this &e 6 ilt day of october, 1981. 4rr***-Xfu l,t My CommissLon Expires