Rogers v Loether Brief for Petitioner
Public Court Documents
October 1, 1973

67 pages
Cite this item
-
Legal Department General, Lani Guinier Correspondence. Correspondence from Lani Guinier to Robert Pear (New York Times) Re: Major v. Treen, 1983. 72b94b1d-e592-ee11-be37-6045bdeb8873. LDF Archives, Thurgood Marshall Institute. https://ldfrecollection.org/archives/archives-search/archives-item/1bf41f97-5f65-46b6-b14c-7352b914d4fb/correspondence-from-lani-guinier-to-robert-pear-new-york-times-re-major-v-treen. Accessed August 19, 2025.
Copied!
ffiesar@renseH. Argust 1I, 1093 Mr. Robert Pear The New York Times 10OO Connecticut Avenue, N. W. Washington, D. C.20036 Dear Robert: I enclose a coBy of 'a speech I gave attackj-ng Brad Reynoldsr voting rights enforcement record. The case which I discuss at length (pp. 5-10) is Major v. Treen. This was the case in which Reynolds backdaEed a memo- randum in anticipation of our lawsuit, and to justify his rejection of the staff finding that the redistrict- ing plan j-n question was in fact purposefully discrimina- tory. I understand we can expect momentarily a decision favorable to the black plaintiffs and consistent with the findings of Justice Department staff lawyers (but NOT Reynolds). I will see that a copy of the decision is sent to you by Express MaiI as soon as it. comes down. Si.ncd;eIy, LG/r Enclosure ' Contributions are decluctible for IJ.S. income tar purposes The NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & E0UCATI0NAL FUND is not part ol the National Association for the Advancement ol Colored People although ir was lounded by it and shares its commilment to equal rights. LDF has had lor over 25 years a separate Board, program, stafl, oflii:e and bud-get. NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE AND EDUCATIONAL FUND. INC. 10 Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y. 10019o (212) 586-8397 t Y, <l.l_ L,r.+/\ Lani Guinier